Re: [rt-users] help with scrip (search correspond body)

2011-08-19 Thread Robert Vicchiullo
heh, ok understood, just not sure where to begin.


From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com 
[rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] on behalf of Ruslan Zakirov 
[r...@bestpractical.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:41 PM
To: Kenneth Crocker
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] help with scrip (search correspond body)

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Kenneth Crocker kfcroc...@lbl.gov wrote:
 Robert,

 As I mentioned earlier, YOU can control what goes out on an email via the
 template. Why don't you just modify the resolve template to NOT put the
 info on that you do not want?

Kenneth, you forget that On Resolve condition triggers on status change action
that has no Content. It's described in FAQ.

Robert here has different problem. Staff members close tickets using
CommandByEmail
and replies without additional text that would be helpful to
requestors. People receive
mails without valuable info, just bunch of meaning less commands.

Robert, at the end you need two things to solve this properly:

1) On Correspond With Content condition
2) Templates that strip commands from content

In both task you get content and delete commands from it. If after
deleting content is not empty then condition should succeed.

Code that strips commands you can borrow from the extension.

 Kenn
 LBNL

 On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Robert Vicchiullo r...@hautelook.com
 wrote:

 I don’t want to stop the resolved email from going out. I want to stop the
 commands that CommandByMail uses being sent to the requestor.



 So for example you can reply to  ticket with Status: resolved and the
 requestor with get that email with the content being just Status: resolved
 and then they will ALSO get the official resolved email as well. I don’t
 want them to get the command email.





 From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
 [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth
 Crocker
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 9:01 AM
 To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com

 Subject: Re: [rt-users] help with scrip (search correspond body)



 Robert,

 Have you tried creating two different resolve notification scrips? 1 for
 the requestor (that uses a template with no content) and 1 for others that
 uses a template with all the content? I'm not sure if that is what you
 wanted, but it's a thought.

 Kenn
 LBNL

 On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Robert Vicchiullo r...@hautelook.com
 wrote:

 i am using the CommandByEmail.
 the problem is when the helpdesk replies to emails it sends out the
 commands to the requester.
 i am trying to write some custom things to block those corresponds from
 going to the requester. so if they someone closes a ticket via email the
 requester will get the email with the Status: resolved in it as well as the
 default templated email saying it was closed.

 and i know we could send the requests to the comment email, but we are
 coming from another ticketing system where there was only 1 email and i
 would rather not have to have everyone always remember to do that. writing
 this seemed like it would be pretty easy. just need to work out the kinks.


 
 From: ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com [ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com] on behalf of
 Ruslan Zakirov [r...@bestpractical.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 3:49 PM
 To: Robert Vicchiullo
 Cc: RT-Users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] help with scrip (search correspond body)

 Hi,

 What exactly are you trying to do? Why do you need custom condition
 when RT has On Correspond out of the box?

 On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Robert Vicchiullo r...@hautelook.com
 wrote:
  Ok that’s worked and I have the following
  my $Content = $self-TransactionObj-Content;
  if( $Content =~ m/Status: resolved/){
   return 0;
  }
  return 1;
 
  problem is when the Content does match and it does return 0;
  it sends out an email and says  This transaction appears to have no
  content
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com [mailto:ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com] On
  Behalf Of Ruslan Zakirov
  Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 1:59 PM
  To: Robert Vicchiullo
  Cc: RT-Users@lists.bestpractical.com
  Subject: Re: [rt-users] help with scrip (search correspond body)
 
  On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Robert Vicchiullo r...@hautelook.com
  wrote:
  Need a little help and would appreciate any advice.
 
  I am trying to write a scrip for
 
  “On Correspond Notify Requestors and Ccs”
 
  I have Condition set to User defined and stage set to transactionbatch.
 
 
 
  In Custom condition I have:
 
 
 
  my $Content =  $self-TransactionObj-Attachments-First-Content;
 
  Try the following:
 
  $self-TransactionObj-Content;
 
  It will find text part in the message and return it content.
 
  [snip]
 
  --
  Best regards, Ruslan.
  
  RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
  *  Chicago, IL, USA  

Re: [rt-users] Linking Remedy and RT3

2011-08-19 Thread Florian Weimer
* Holger Baust:

 Parts of our company use Remedy and our branch uses RT3 as issue-trackers.
 Now I have to check if a linking between Remedy and one or mor
 RT3-Queues ist possible.

We link some of our RT tickets with trouble ticket systems at other
organizations by using a ticket-specific email addresses and adopting
the subject of any auto-response (for which you need ticket-specific
addresses because some ticketing systems completely replace the incoming
subject line).  We also changed RT's mail behavior to more closely match
that of a regular mail client (no more Reply-To:, no automatic resending
of all incoming replies).  In general, this is sufficient to create
foreign tickets which are linked to RT tickets on our side.

Anything more elaborate (such as automatic mirroring of queue contents)
will be quite difficult, I fear.

-- 
Florian Weimerfwei...@bfk.de
BFK edv-consulting GmbH   http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100  tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA  September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA  October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA  October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia  November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain  November 28  29, 2011


[rt-users] Interesting new rt-shredder error

2011-08-19 Thread Howard Jones
I've just moved my RT system from 3.8.7 on a 32-bit CentOS 4 system to
3.8.10 on a 64-bit CentOS 6 system, and I've found a strange error:

# ./rt-shredder --sqldump unshred.sql --plugin
'Tickets=query,Status=deleted'

Couldn't find plugin 'Tickets'
Plugins list:
Objects
Users
Attachments
Summary
! Tickets
SQLDump

I did my migration by doing a fresh install of 3.8.10, and then pointing
at a restore of the old database, in case that makes a difference...

Any suggestions? I haven't been able to run rt-shredder on the old
system for a long time due to memory constraints. Now I've got 8GB, I
still can't run it thanks to this! :-)

I've looked at the code in rt-shredder parse_args() , and as far as I
can see it ought to work...

Howie

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA  September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA  October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA  October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia  November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain  November 28  29, 2011


[rt-users] Add custom field to default search query

2011-08-19 Thread Lars Braeuer
Hello,

the default search form on every page only allows to search through standard 
fields, but not through
custom fields.

Is there any way, like hacking an (sql) query, to include just one custom field 
with the standard
search?

I.e. we are tracking the customer ID in one of these fields. We would like to 
include it in the
standard search, without having to use the advanced search feature, which takes 
time. It's also not
applicable to setup saved searches, as we want to remain totally dynamic.

Any hints?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

Lars Braeuer

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA  September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA  October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA  October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia  November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain  November 28  29, 2011


Re: [rt-users] Interesting new rt-shredder error

2011-08-19 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:36:05AM +0100, Howard Jones wrote:
 I've just moved my RT system from 3.8.7 on a 32-bit CentOS 4 system to
 3.8.10 on a 64-bit CentOS 6 system, and I've found a strange error:
 
 # ./rt-shredder --sqldump unshred.sql --plugin
 'Tickets=query,Status=deleted'
 
 Couldn't find plugin 'Tickets'
 Plugins list:
 Objects
 Users
 Attachments
 Summary
 ! Tickets
 SQLDump
 
 I did my migration by doing a fresh install of 3.8.10, and then pointing
 at a restore of the old database, in case that makes a difference...
 
 Any suggestions? I haven't been able to run rt-shredder on the old
 system for a long time due to memory constraints. Now I've got 8GB, I
 still can't run it thanks to this! :-)
 
 I've looked at the code in rt-shredder parse_args() , and as far as I
 can see it ought to work...

You want 5add26c8d76d8a25626ba02ebafe0734fb34619f which will be in
3.8.11 and was released in 4.0.2

-kevin


pgpsjNgCCy0zX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

Re: [rt-users] Add custom field to default search query

2011-08-19 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:13:23PM +0200, Lars Braeuer wrote:
 the default search form on every page only allows to search through standard 
 fields, but not through
 custom fields.
 
 Is there any way, like hacking an (sql) query, to include just one custom 
 field with the standard
 search?
 
 I.e. we are tracking the customer ID in one of these fields. We would like to 
 include it in the
 standard search, without having to use the advanced search feature, which 
 takes time. It's also not
 applicable to setup saved searches, as we want to remain totally dynamic.

I'm assuming that you're on RT4 since you didn't specify, this code
changed dramatically between 3.8 and 4.

You probably want to override HandleSubject to search Subject and the
CF, or add your own item to @GUESS in lib/RT/Search/Googleish.pm

-kevin


pgpvFNo8SKWuw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

Re: [rt-users] Create Database without Root

2011-08-19 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:43:39AM -0400, Christopher Lasater wrote:
Hi,
 
   I am trying to use a database created for me by the DBAs at 
 my company.  I do
not have root privileges, just a regular username and password.  I have 
 created the tables
using schema.mysql but I can not populate the data.  Are there instruction 
 for creating the RT
database when the Database has already been created and you do not have 
 root rights?

/opt/rt4/sbin/rt-setup-database --help
search for --skip-create

-kevin


pgpMx8mDYT5B5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

[rt-users] Select multiple bug?

2011-08-19 Thread Jeff Blaine

RT 3.8.10

In edit mode (Modify.html), there is some serious funkiness
going on with fields that are Select multiple.

Is this a known problem?

I'm not sure where to begin explaining it.  If you screw
around with it a bit, ctrl-click adding a few values,
then saving the ticket, deselecting some + save, etc
you will see what I mean.

The state of things is being lost here and there.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA  September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA  October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA  October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia  November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain  November 28  29, 2011


Re: [rt-users] Select multiple bug?

2011-08-19 Thread Jeff Blaine

This is also a problem in 3.8.7 where it was originally
reported by staff using our production instance.

On 8/19/2011 11:34 AM, Jeff Blaine wrote:

RT 3.8.10

In edit mode (Modify.html), there is some serious funkiness
going on with fields that are Select multiple.

Is this a known problem?

I'm not sure where to begin explaining it. If you screw
around with it a bit, ctrl-click adding a few values,
then saving the ticket, deselecting some + save, etc
you will see what I mean.

The state of things is being lost here and there.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Chicago, IL, USA September 26  27, 2011
* San Francisco, CA, USA October 18  19, 2011
* Washington DC, USA October 31  November 1, 2011
* Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28  29, 2011
* Barcelona, Spain November 28  29, 2011



RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA  September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA  October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA  October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia  November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain  November 28  29, 2011


Re: [rt-users] Convert Other Ticketing System DB to RT?

2011-08-19 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Michael,

Sorry for the delay. Went on vacation and when I got back I had a list of a
zillion things to do and they were all emergencies. Like which rush job do
you want me to rush ahead of which rush job? kind of thing.

Anyway, attached is the perl program that we had written (I sure couldn't do
it. I'm a perl dummy. Just ask Kevin or Ruslan) to convert a flat file (from
a legacy DB ticket system) into the RT system. Obviously, you will have
different fields, etc. but the logic should be helpful. Weused the RT API to
get the records into RT.

Hope this helps.

Kenn
LBNL

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Jason Ledford jledf...@biltmore.com wrote:

 What database access do you have to those older tickets and what type of
 database is it?  Mine was a homebrew asp app with access db.  I created a
 page in asp that queried the db and wrote the page to look like the offline
 tool.  So I turned off all email notification and then ran through about
 15000 tickets in the offline tool.  I broke it up in 5000 chunks.  I would
 be happy to share what I created if it is helpful.

 ** **

 *From:* rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:
 rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] *On Behalf Of *Michael Steen
 *Sent:* Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:12 PM

 *To:* rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 *Subject:* [rt-users] Convert Other Ticketing System DB to RT?

 ** **

 All,

 I am wondering if anyone has successfully converted a database from another
 ticketing system to RT.  I found a thread from 2008 about OTRS (
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/users/81165) in which Jesse said
 that most people abandon their former ticketing systems to start fresh with
 RT.

 In my case, I have about 1200 tickets that I would like to save currently
 living in a Support Center ticketing system by Quality Unit.  If anyone has
 had success in converting a DB, and/or if there is any existing
 documentation I haven't found, please let me know.  Also, if anyone has met
 with failure attempting to do something like this, I would appreciate your
 feedback, as well.  I'd like to avoid wasted effort if it's not worth it in
 the long run.

 Thanks,

 Mike


 
 2011 Training: http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html

#!/tools/bin/perl -w
#--
#   convert change request data from a Flat File from a Legacy sys to RT.
#   Turn OFF RT and then change your RT_SiteConfig.pm to turn off logging.
#   Be sure to TURN OFF all scrips either before being RT down or via DBA/SQL.
#   scrips will try to run and logging will make the program run FOREVER!!
#   flat file input can be created by via Data::Dumper;
#   Obviously, field names will be different. OUR Data Names are all CAPS_CAPS
#   We built tickets, CF's into two different queues, ES-HRIS  ES-LETS
#   We also have an extra Ticket Status value of QA testing.
#--
use strict;

use lib /$RTHome/rt/perl/lib;
use lib /$RTHome/rt/lib;

use RT;
use RT::Ticket;
use RT::Transaction;
use RT::Attachment;
use MIME::Entity;  



#--
#process all requests into tickets
#--
sub Read_Temp_File
{
my ( $fh ) = @_;

my
(
$in,
$objectId,
$evt,
$VAR1,  #Dumper default variable name
$k,
$n,
);

while ( $in = $fh )
{
chomp $in;
eval $in;  #instantiates $VAR1 as hash object of change_request and 
associated change_events

#print $VAR1-{REQUEST}, ' ', $VAR1-{DESCR_SHORT}, \n;

foreach $k ( qw/MOVED_TO_PRODUCTION_DT QA_APPROVAL_DT/ )
{
if ( $VAR1-{$k} gt ' ' )
{
if ( $VAR1-{$k}  '2038'   ||  $VAR1-{$k}  '2001' )
{
$VAR1-{$k} = '2038-01-01';   #max RT date year
}
}
}

$objectId = New_Ticket( $VAR1 );#ObjectId = Ticket.id

foreach $evt ( @{$VAR1-{EVENTS}} )
{
$evt-{ObjectId} = $objectId;
$evt-{TransactionId} = New_Transaction( $evt );  #TransactionId = 
Transaction.id
New_Attachment( $evt );
}
}
}



#--
#create Ticket for one request
#--
sub New_Ticket
{
my ( $req ) = @_;

my
(
$ticket,
$mimeObj,
$ticketid, 
$transaction_object, 
$err,
$rc,
$status,
$cc,
$ccid,
$grp,
$mem,
$memberid,
$priority, 
$rejected,
%ticket_vals,
%req_type_HRIS,
%req_type_LETS,
);
  

Re: [rt-users] Request Tracker 4.0.1 and Asset Tracker Extension

2011-08-19 Thread Dustin Berube
Todd,

I would be willing to review updates and provide feedback. I have been
holding off our upgrade to RT4 until AT was updated.

Thanks,
Dustin

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

[rt-users] Problems with RT::Mason

2011-08-19 Thread Chris Phillips
I have the following specs:

FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE running in a jailed environment
Server: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) DAV/2 mod_ssl/2.2.15 OpenSSL/0.9.8r PHP/5.2.10
mod_perl/2.0.5 Perl/v5.10.1
RT 4.0.2 installed from source

I am getting an internal server error whenever I try and load the RT UI.

[Fri Aug 19 10:35:54 2011] [error] [client 10.0.0.31] failed to resolve
handler `RT::Mason': Can't locate RT/Mason.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1/BSDPAN
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/mach
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1/mach
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1 . /www) at (eval 4) line 3.\n

There is indeed no RT::Mason module in there.

I do however have the following:

/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Apache/Mason.pm
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Bundle/HTML/Mason.pm
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/HTML/Mason.pm
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Locale/Maketext/Extract/Plugin/Mason.pm
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mason.pm

Running a 'make testdeps' returns the following:

All dependencies have been found.

My apache config looks like this:

Location /rt/
AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler RT::Mason
/Location

I have no statement for webmux.pl as it looks to be deprecated in RT4.

I have changed RT::Mason to HTML::Mason and the error goes away, but the
page is rendered blank without any errors or insight as to what else could
be wrong.

Does anyone have any idea what I might be doing wrong?

Thanks in advance!

Cheers.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

Re: [rt-users] Problems with RT::Mason

2011-08-19 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:14:43PM -0700, Chris Phillips wrote:
Location /rt/
AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler RT::Mason
/Location
 
I have no statement for [1]webmux.pl as it looks to be deprecated in RT4.

This doesn't look like the configuration we document in
docs/web_deployment.pod

-kevin


pgpvBAucBkx83.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

Re: [rt-users] Problems with RT::Mason

2011-08-19 Thread Chris Phillips
Kevin,

You're right.  It's not.  I foolishly went by the wiki instead, which is
clearly outdated.  This appear to be working now.  Thank you very much for
your help.  :)

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Kevin Falcone falc...@bestpractical.comwrote:

 On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:14:43PM -0700, Chris Phillips wrote:
 Location /rt/
 AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
 SetHandler perl-script
 PerlHandler RT::Mason
 /Location
 
 I have no statement for [1]webmux.pl as it looks to be deprecated in
 RT4.

 This doesn't look like the configuration we document in
 docs/web_deployment.pod

 -kevin


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

Re: [rt-users] Problems with RT::Mason

2011-08-19 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:34:37PM -0700, Chris Phillips wrote:
You're right. It's not. I foolishly went by the wiki instead, which is 
 clearly outdated. This
appear to be working now. Thank you very much for your help. :)

Which wiki page?  I thought we'd marked most of the old and outdated
install guides as such, but we've apparently missed some.

-kevin

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Kevin Falcone 
 [1]falc...@bestpractical.com wrote:
 
  On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:14:43PM -0700, Chris Phillips wrote:
   Location /rt/
   AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
   SetHandler perl-script
   PerlHandler RT::Mason
   /Location
  
   I have no statement for [1][2]webmux.pl as it looks to be deprecated 
 in RT4.
 
  This doesn't look like the configuration we document in
  docs/web_deployment.pod
  -kevin


pgpGvZayMgoHL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

Re: [rt-users] Problems with RT::Mason

2011-08-19 Thread Chris Phillips
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Kevin Falcone falc...@bestpractical.comwrote:


 Which wiki page?  I thought we'd marked most of the old and outdated
 install guides as such, but we've apparently missed some.


It was marked as outdated. As before, I foolishly followed it.  Are there
any plans to update the wikis?

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

Re: [rt-users] Problems with RT::Mason

2011-08-19 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 02:27:26PM -0700, Chris Phillips wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Kevin Falcone 
 [1]falc...@bestpractical.com wrote:
 
  Which wiki page? I thought we'd marked most of the old and outdated
  install guides as such, but we've apparently missed some.
 
It was marked as outdated. As before, I foolishly followed it. Are there 
 any plans to update
the wikis?

We spent a lot of effort updating the documentation included with RT
and that is always what we recommend following.  If there was
something in the README that prevented you from installing or
upgrading successfully please file a bug with a suggestion.

-kevin


pgpE2np4c8Hw0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

Re: [rt-users] As root I cannot remove a watcher from a queue -

2011-08-19 Thread Landon Stewart
On 14 August 2011 14:20, Ruslan Zakirov r...@bestpractical.com wrote:

 Hi,

 Last time I looked into such error it was a problem with revoking
 delegated rights. RT 4.0 drops support for personal groups and
 delegations. I recommend you to walk through ACL table and check all
 records where Delegated* columns are not zero or NULL.


Seems OK...
mysql select * from ACL WHERE DelegatedBy != 0 OR DelegatedFrom != 0;
Empty set (0.00 sec)


 If you don't have delegated rights then it's something else.

 Other idea is inconsistent database. Use rt-validator in recent 3.8
 releases to check consistency.


This did it!

Thanks again Ruslan.

-- 
Landon Stewart lstew...@superb.net
SuperbHosting.Net by Superb Internet Corp.
Toll Free (US/Canada): 888-354-6128 x 4199
Direct: 206-438-5879
Web hosting and more Ahead of the Rest: http://www.superbhosting.net

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011

Re: [rt-users] Problems with RT::Mason

2011-08-19 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Chris Phillips
bandwidthwholesal...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Kevin Falcone falc...@bestpractical.com
 wrote:

 Which wiki page?  I thought we'd marked most of the old and outdated
 install guides as such, but we've apparently missed some.


 It was marked as outdated. As before, I foolishly followed it.  Are there
 any plans to update the wikis?

Wiki installation guides are written by users. Wiki is a community
resource. Update guide you followed with instructions for RT 4.0.x



 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 *  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26  27, 2011
 *  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18  19, 2011
 *  Washington DC, USA — October 31  November 1, 2011
 *  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28  29, 2011
 *  Barcelona, Spain — November 28  29, 2011




-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA  September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA  October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA  October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia  November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain  November 28  29, 2011