Re: [rt-users] Queue issue when using Requestor perms

2012-01-10 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
Hi,

Looks like it's annoying bug. Grant user who can be requestor right to
SeeQueue. This will avoid such misbehavior. Granting SeeQueue doesn't
give right to see all tickets or create a new ticket.

I'm filing a bug report.

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:21, Brent Wiese bwi...@elementps.com wrote:
 A priv’d user creates a ticket in queue A.



 An Admin moves it to queue B.



 Queue B has create/reply perms for Everyone (temporarily) and Comment/View
 CF/View Queue/View Ticket Summaries for Requestor.



 The requestor can continue to see the ticket (logged out and back in to
 confirm this isn’t a caching thing) and comment/reply. However, if they
 click on “The Basics”, the queue field resets back to the original queue “A”
 and the current queue “B” is not in the list. If they save anything, it
 moves it back to the original queue “A”.



 Shouldn’t the current queue “B” be there since “view queue” is set for
 Requestor? In fact, if you add all the perms together for this requestor, it
 matches or exceeds the original queue.



 Rt 4.0.4.



 Thanks!

 Brent


 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston — March 5  6, 2012



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] setting up approvals on RT 4.0.1

2012-01-10 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 01/10/2012 01:21 AM, Asanka Gunasekera wrote:
 Hi Can any one tell me what I am doing wrong??

Kevin told you what you're doing wrong 5 days ago.  Please read his
response.

Thomas

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


[rt-users] Server generated tickets...

2012-01-10 Thread Damien Hull
I have a couple of servers that send roots mail to RT. Is there a way
to prevent or get rid of the response email from RT?

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


[rt-users] RT::Extension::TicketLocking update?

2012-01-10 Thread Roedel, Mark
Has anyone taken a stab at modifying RT::Extension::TicketLocking to work with 
RT4?

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] rt-mailgate

2012-01-10 Thread Robert Nesius
Thanks for the suggestions guys.

I finally just turned off my re-write rule that was re-directing http to
https and side-stepped the rt-mailgate ssl failure all together.  Not
ideal, but in practice very few of my users log into RT directly so it's a
configuration I can live with short term while I figure out the real issue.


I've configured postfix to hand messages to the aliases for my queues
directly to rt-mailgate.  It is rt-mailgate that cannot verify the ssl
certificate that my web server is presenting it.  None of my web browsers
have trouble with it, so it feels like an rt-mailgate configuration issue.
I can repro the issue on the command line

root@linux:~# /opt/rt4/bin/rt-mailgate --debug --queue 'general' --action
correspond --url https://request.domain.com/  ~/test.msg
/opt/rt4/bin/rt-mailgate: temp file is '/tmp/XOCrOYAr8p/vkVDTmoszI'
/opt/rt4/bin/rt-mailgate: connecting to
https://request.domain.com//REST/1.0/NoAuth/mail-gateway
An Error Occurred
=

500 Can't connect to
request.domain.com:443 (certificate
verify failed)

/opt/rt4/bin/rt-mailgate: undefined server error

-Rob


On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Izz Abdullah izz.abdul...@hibbett.comwrote:

 And if that doesn't work, since I have a certificate with a domain name
 (although signed by our internal CA which all of our PCs trust), I had to
 put in below where Mauricio put in https://localhost, I actually needed
 to use my dns name in which the certificate is assigned (e.g. https://MyRT
 )

 My $0.02 worth as well. :)

 -Original Message-
 From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:
 rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares
 Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 4:02 PM
 To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] rt-mailgate

 On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Robert Nesius nes...@gmail.com wrote:
  I made a recently change to how my apache2 server was configured to
  redirect all requests through https.  Now emails are not flowing
  through to RT - I tracked the issue down to rt-mailgate complaining
  about not being able to verify the certificate.  I'm a little
  perplexed on how to proceed or how to verify what certs/CAs
  rt-mailgate is using, or if there is an issue with the Crypt::SSLeay
 module (which I had to force install due to a failing test).
  I only have one openssl install on the system, and I thought
  Crypt::SSLeay would reach through to those configs for things like CA
 certs, etc...
 
  Perhaps an easy workaround, since the mail server and apache2 server
  are on the same machine, would be to configure a localhost:80
  virtual host within
  apache2 and bypass SSL when accessing RT via that url.
 
  Any helpful hints/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.   I've
  been google-ing away but haven't had any luck yet.
 
  AFAIK, rt-mailgate connects to RT using RT's web interface; it should
 use whatever cert you have defined in the virtual host entry for RT. Here
 is how my fetchmailrc calls rt-mailgate:

 mda /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/rt-mailgate --url https://localhost/rt \
 --queue support --action correspond

  -Rob
 
  
  RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
  * Boston - March 5  6, 2012
 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston  March 5  6, 2012
 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston  March 5  6, 2012


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] Server generated tickets...

2012-01-10 Thread Damien Hull
Looks like I was over thinking this one. Thanks for the simple solution...

On Jan 10, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Kevin Falcone falc...@bestpractical.com wrote:

 On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 06:25:03AM -0900, Damien Hull wrote:
 I have a couple of servers that send roots mail to RT. Is there a way
 to prevent or get rid of the response email from RT?

 The easiest way is to edit those user accounts and leave the Name as
 the email address but blank out the email address field.

 Or log in as the user and change their preferences to never receive
 email

 -kevin
 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston � March 5  6, 2012

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012