Re: [rt-users] SelfService and ticket submission via Mail

2012-02-17 Thread Howell, Van
I can do that, but another problem occurred to me.
From time to time Students and sometimes Faculty and Staff use email addresses 
not assigned by the University. 
Will RT setup another account or just ignore the message? Can I setup a 
response that will tell them to use their University account?

Van Howell
System Administrator
Lubbock Christian University

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Kevin Falcone falc...@bestpractical.com wrote:

 On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:08:27PM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
   I would recommend making them all privileged so you cab put them in groups 
 (like staff,
   students, etc.) with similar access needs.
 
 Kenn - this ignores one of the most useful features of RT for
 non-technical users - the SelfService interface where all they see are
 their tickets in a greatly simplified interface.  
 
 Van - I assume you mean your LDAP RTUsers group?
 You'll either need to remove the RTUsers group restriction on
 RT-Authen-ExternalAuth or add users to it.
 
 -kevin
 
   On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Howell, Van [1]van.how...@lcu.edu wrote:
 
 I am using LDAP authentication.
 
 I have about 2000 users in Faculty, Staff, Student and Distance Ed 
 groups.
 
 I want them to be able to submit tickets via email and check progress 
 using self service.
 
 Do they each have to be a member of my RTUsers group to do this?
 ATT1
 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston � March 5  6, 2012

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012

[rt-users] Privileged users and ticket creation

2012-02-17 Thread Anthony24x

Do privileged users have the ability to post into any queue regardless of
their specific permissions?

I'm asking because I have an employee that has the check box Let this user
be granted rights (Privileged)
Checked but does NOT have the right either thru user or group rights to
Create tickets but she can still
choose whatever queue she wants from the drop down... is there anyway to
prevent this?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Privileged-users-and-ticket-creation-tp33342865p33342865.html
Sent from the Request Tracker - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


[rt-users] SLA reporting

2012-02-17 Thread Soula, Christophe
Hi,

We are using RT4.02 for our IT service Center with SLA module defining start 
and due date (Response time and resolution time as defined in RT_Siteconfig.pm).
My concern right now is to find a way to report Performance against the SLA at 
two level:

-  Response time

-  Resolution time

The idea we have is to use rt-crontool to store into CF Request already late in 
regards of response time and also in regards of resolution time

For response time the query could be something like : Status = 'new' AND 
TimeLeft  0
For resolution time the query could be something like : TimeLeft  0 AND (  
Status = 'open' OR Status = 'stalled' )

Now the idea is to set a specific hidden CF called LateResponse and 
LateResolution with value 0 or 1 to keep a track of late response or late 
resolution
The solution to update the CF could be to use then bin/rt/ command line.

And finally query directly the MySQL DB to get our report.

Is there any other idea to create this report from your point of view

thanks


Please be advised that this email may contain confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us 
by email by replying to the sender and delete this message.  The 
sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer 
to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the 
foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or 
other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included 
in any attachment.


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] Privileged users and ticket creation

2012-02-17 Thread Anthony24x

I also wanted to add my RT version RT 4.0.1

Anthony24x wrote:
 
 Do privileged users have the ability to post into any queue regardless of
 their specific permissions?
 
 I'm asking because I have an employee that has the check box Let this
 user be granted rights (Privileged)
 Checked but does NOT have the right either thru user or group rights to
 Create tickets but she can still
 choose whatever queue she wants from the drop down... is there anyway to
 prevent this?
 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Privileged-users-and-ticket-creation-tp33342865p33342936.html
Sent from the Request Tracker - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


Re: [rt-users] Privileged users and ticket creation

2012-02-17 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:06:58AM -0800, Anthony24x wrote:
 
 Do privileged users have the ability to post into any queue regardless of
 their specific permissions?

No.

 I'm asking because I have an employee that has the check box Let this user
 be granted rights (Privileged)
 Checked but does NOT have the right either thru user or group rights to
 Create tickets but she can still
 choose whatever queue she wants from the drop down... is there anyway to
 prevent this?

Remove some of your global SeeQueue and CreateTicket rights.

It's likely you gave Everyone CreateTicket Globally and you may need
to push that down into certain queues (or just give Unprivileged that
rights).  It depends on how you're running your RT queues.

-kevin


pgp54pr1hnNfB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] SelfService and ticket submission via Mail

2012-02-17 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:50:26PM +, Howell, Van wrote:
 I can do that, but another problem occurred to me.
 From time to time Students and sometimes Faculty and Staff use email 
 addresses not assigned by the University. 
 Will RT setup another account or just ignore the message? Can I setup a 
 response that will tell them to use their University account?

Yes, RT will create a new account by default. There are a few options.
You can configure RT-Authen-ExternalAuth to disallow mail from email
addresses that aren't in LDAP. Or you can use the MergeUsers extension
to go in and merge people together after the fact.

If all their addresses are in LDAP, there's a branch of
RT-Authen-ExternalAuth you could test.

-kevin

 On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Kevin Falcone falc...@bestpractical.com 
 wrote:
 
  On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:08:27PM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
I would recommend making them all privileged so you cab put them in 
  groups (like staff,
students, etc.) with similar access needs.
  
  Kenn - this ignores one of the most useful features of RT for
  non-technical users - the SelfService interface where all they see are
  their tickets in a greatly simplified interface.  
  
  Van - I assume you mean your LDAP RTUsers group?
  You'll either need to remove the RTUsers group restriction on
  RT-Authen-ExternalAuth or add users to it.
  
  -kevin
  
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Howell, Van [1]van.how...@lcu.edu 
  wrote:
  
  I am using LDAP authentication.
  
  I have about 2000 users in Faculty, Staff, Student and Distance Ed 
  groups.
  
  I want them to be able to submit tickets via email and check progress 
  using self service.
  
  Do they each have to be a member of my RTUsers group to do this?


pgpliq71MgAW1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] SLA reporting

2012-02-17 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
Hi,

There is a custom branch in the repository that makes a stab at
calculating whether people met deadlines or not. It's not complete,
but it's a good start. This code walks history of a ticket and
calculates whether configured deadlines were met or not.

Your idea with crontool is bad.

It's better to use scrips with on correspond and on resolve
conditions. With this solution you get accurate statistics, but you
get it late to react.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 18:19, Soula, Christophe cso...@hach-lange.com wrote:
 Hi,



 We are using RT4.02 for our IT service Center with SLA module defining start
 and due date (Response time and resolution time as defined in
 RT_Siteconfig.pm).

 My concern right now is to find a way to report Performance against the SLA
 at two level:

 -  Response time

 -  Resolution time



 The idea we have is to use rt-crontool to store into CF Request already late
 in regards of response time and also in regards of resolution time



 For response time the query could be something like : Status = 'new' AND
 TimeLeft  0

 For resolution time the query could be something like : TimeLeft  0 AND (
 Status = 'open' OR Status = 'stalled' )



 Now the idea is to set a specific hidden CF called LateResponse and
 LateResolution with value 0 or 1 to keep a track of late response or late
 resolution

 The solution to update the CF could be to use then bin/rt/ command line.



 And finally query directly the MySQL DB to get our report.



 Is there any other idea to create this report from your point of view



 thanks


 Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If
 you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to
 the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of
 this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any
 agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding
 effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature
 that is included in any attachment.

 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston — March 5  6, 2012



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012

[rt-users] Upgrading from 3.4.5

2012-02-17 Thread Jaime Kikpole
I'm currently using RT 3.4.5.  I'd like to upgrade it.  I was
wondering if I should just go straight to 4.0.x or go to 3.6, then
3.8, and then to 4.0.  What would you suggest?

Thanks,
Jaime

-- 
Network Administrator
Cairo-Durham Central School District
http://cns.cairodurham.org

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


Re: [rt-users] Upgrading from 3.4.5

2012-02-17 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 02/17/2012 02:01 PM, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
 I'm currently using RT 3.4.5.  I'd like to upgrade it.  I was
 wondering if I should just go straight to 4.0.x or go to 3.6, then
 3.8, and then to 4.0.  What would you suggest?

Going straight to 4.0.x is fine.  There are a number of important
database upgrade steps you need to do, so read all of the README and
docs/UPGRADING-3.4, docs/UPGRADING-3.6, docs/UPGRADING-3.8,
docs/UPGRADING-4.0 and docs/UPGRADING.mysql if it applies to you.

Thomas

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


Re: [rt-users] Upgrading from 3.4.5

2012-02-17 Thread Jaime Kikpole
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Sibley t...@bestpractical.com wrote:
 Going straight to 4.0.x is fine.  There are a number of important
 database upgrade steps you need to do, so read all of the README and
 docs/UPGRADING-3.4, docs/UPGRADING-3.6, docs/UPGRADING-3.8,
 docs/UPGRADING-4.0 and docs/UPGRADING.mysql if it applies to you.

Thanks!  As it happens, I did notice those files.  I went looking for
readmes before bothering the list.  :)  Reading the files made me
wonder if I should do this incrementally, though.

Thanks, Thomas, for the quick and thorough answer.  This is going to
save me a lot of time.

Jaime

-- 
Network Administrator
Cairo-Durham Central School District
http://cns.cairodurham.org

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


Re: [rt-users] Upgrading from 3.4.5

2012-02-17 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 02/17/2012 02:15 PM, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Sibley t...@bestpractical.com wrote:
 Going straight to 4.0.x is fine.  There are a number of important
 database upgrade steps you need to do, so read all of the README and
 docs/UPGRADING-3.4, docs/UPGRADING-3.6, docs/UPGRADING-3.8,
 docs/UPGRADING-4.0 and docs/UPGRADING.mysql if it applies to you.
 
 Thanks!  As it happens, I did notice those files.  I went looking for
 readmes before bothering the list.  :)  Reading the files made me
 wonder if I should do this incrementally, though.
 
 Thanks, Thomas, for the quick and thorough answer.  This is going to
 save me a lot of time.

No problem.  Glad to hear you're upgrading. :)  You may also be
interested in
http://blog.bestpractical.com/2011/07/upgrading-to-rt-4.html which also
summarizes the things you should be aware of during an upgrade.

Thomas

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


Re: [rt-users] Upgrading from 3.4.5

2012-02-17 Thread Jaime Kikpole
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Thomas Sibley t...@bestpractical.com wrote:
 No problem.  Glad to hear you're upgrading. :)  You may also be
 interested in
 http://blog.bestpractical.com/2011/07/upgrading-to-rt-4.html which also
 summarizes the things you should be aware of during an upgrade.

Thanks.  I was assuming I should mysqldump  backup.sql just to be
safe.  I don't run it in a VM (I've used RT since before VMs were
fashionable), though.

Any thoughts on the mysqldump idea?

Thanks,
Jaime

-- 
Network Administrator
Cairo-Durham Central School District
http://cns.cairodurham.org

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


Re: [rt-users] Upgrading from 3.4.5

2012-02-17 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 02/17/2012 04:58 PM, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
 Thanks.  I was assuming I should mysqldump  backup.sql just to be
 safe.  I don't run it in a VM (I've used RT since before VMs were
 fashionable), though.
 
 Any thoughts on the mysqldump idea?

Yep, all of our documentation tells you to take backups.  For backing up
a 3.4.5 database, you'll want to use the --default-character-set=binary
option.  See also UPGRADING.mysql.

T.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


[rt-users] Searching on Custom Fields

2012-02-17 Thread Jason Marshall
Hi all, I looked through the archives as best I could and didn't see 
anything specifically about this issue.


RT 3.8.8

I've got a queue with 2 custom fields associated with it (they're not 
global custom fields).


Click on Tickets, then New Search.

Select the queue, and hit Add These Terms, and one of the two custom 
fields shows up in the Add Criteria section, but not both.


Smells like a bug.  Anyone know if this works right in a later 3.x 
release?  Or is this happening only to me?


Thanks in advance!

---
Jason Marshall
IT Manager
Kelman Data Management

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012