[rt-users] AdminCC for queues not to get notified after ticket has owner

2010-10-21 Thread Steve O'Brien
I can seem to find the right way to accomplish this:
I have my groups as adminCCs for their respective queues so that they get 
notified when tickets get created which is working great, however once a tech 
picks up a ticket I do not want everyone getting notified on ticket 
correspondence, I see that I can delete that global Scrip but that seems a bit 
drastic.  Is there a better way?

TIA,
Steve



Re: [rt-users] AdminCC for queues not to get notified after ticket has owner

2010-10-21 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Steve,

Modify the scrip as to who gets the notification.

Kenn
LBNL

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Steve O'Brien wrote:

>  I can seem to find the right way to accomplish this:
>
> I have my groups as adminCCs for their respective queues so that they get
> notified when tickets get created which is working great, however once a
> tech picks up a ticket I do not want everyone getting notified on ticket
> correspondence, I see that I can delete that global Scrip but that seems a
> bit drastic.  Is there a better way?
>
>
>
> TIA,
>
> Steve
>
>
>


Re: [rt-users] AdminCC for queues not to get notified after ticket has owner

2010-10-22 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
Hi Steve,

You have several solutions:
1) notify adminccs only on create and not on correspond
2) notify adminccs only if owner is nobody

Both you can do by managing conditions on your scrips. Second case
requires custom condition, but it's very easy condition to write.
Check out http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/CustomConditionSnippets

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Steve O'Brien  wrote:
> I can seem to find the right way to accomplish this:
>
> I have my groups as adminCCs for their respective queues so that they get
> notified when tickets get created which is working great, however once a
> tech picks up a ticket I do not want everyone getting notified on ticket
> correspondence, I see that I can delete that global Scrip but that seems a
> bit drastic.  Is there a better way?
>
>
>
> TIA,
>
> Steve
>
>



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.