Jesse, I now have some time to dig into the code and/or docs. Have
you already tackled this, or would a patch be welcome?
On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> Following up on my own post:
>
> RFC 2822, 3.6:
> ...for the purposes of this standard, header fields SHOULD NOT be
> reordered
> when a message is transported or transformed. More importantly, the
> trace
> header fields and resent header fields MUST NOT be reordered, and
> SHOULD be
> kept in blocks prepended to the message.
>
> So, if we're reordering the received lines, it's a bug I'd like to
> see fixed.
> Assuming they don't otherwise compromise the system (which is
> really, always the case),
> patches would most certainly be welcome.
>
> Best,
> Jesse
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
