[RollTideFan] Cottrell: Culpepper attorneys paid for by NCAA

2005-06-07 Thread Jeff Todd
TUSCALOOSA | Attorneys for former University of Alabama 
assistant football coaches Ronnie Cottrell and Ivy 
Williams have asked for an order to force defendant Tom 
Culpepper to produce a document they believe will show 
that his legal fees are being paid by the National 
Collegiate Athletic Association.

In the motion seeking the order, lawyers for Cottrell 
and Williams claim that such an agreement between the 
NCAA and Culpepper would clearly result in bias[ed] 
testimony.

According to court documents, the plaintiffs believe 
such an agreement was reached on or around Nov. 15, 
2004.

Cottrell and Williams are suing the NCAA and others, 
including Culpepper, for defamation after they were 
fired in the wake of a recruiting scandal.

The motion claims: The defendants (Culpepper, the NCAA 
et al) base their decision not to produce the 
confidentiality agreement on erroneous conclusions of 
law and attempts to apply the Alabama Rules of Evidence 
to discovery.

The plaintiffs are seeking $15 million in compensatory 
damages and $45 million in punitive damages after being 
identified in an NCAA investigation, but later cleared.

According to records released in the Logan Young 
criminal case in Memphis, Culpepper was a key secret 
witness for the NCAA in building its case against 
Alabama along with Tennessee coach Phillip Fulmer.

Culpepper's three-year contract to provide Alabama with 
video content of potential high school recruits 
concluded this past season.

In early May, both Culpepper and the NCAA filed motions 
before Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court Judge Steve 
Wilson for summary judgment because plaintiffs, as 
public figures cannot establish through clear and 
convincing evidence that any of the NCAA defendant's 
statements were made with 'actual malice' needed to 
sustain those claims.

A hearing on the matter has been scheduled for June 23.

Another hearing regarding the motions to compel will be 
held the following day, June 24.

The case is scheduled for a jury trial beginning July 
11.

The initial motion to compel against Culpepper was filed 
on May 23.

In its response, attorneys for the NCAA argued that the 
request seeks information that is immaterial, irrelevant 
and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery 
of the admissible evidence. This defendant also objects 
to this request for production to the extent that it 
seeks information that is personal, confidential and/or 
protected from disclosure pursuant to the Alabama Rules 
of Civil Procedure.

The defense also contended that discovery of the 
agreement would have a chilling effect on the 
settlement negotiations - which plaintiffs denied.

An additional motion against other defendants, including 
the NCAA, was filed Tuesday. In it, part of Rule 8 of 
the Alabama Rules of Evidence was highlighted: This 
rule also does not require exclusion when the evidence 
is offered for another purpose, such as proving bias or 
prejudice of a witness ..

Culpepper is represented by Birmingham's John Scott, who 
could not be reached for comment. His firm, Starnes and 
Atchison, also represented the university in the initial 
stages of the lawsuit.

In February, Young was convicted on four counts of 
conspiracy, crossing state lines to commit racketeering 
and arranging bank withdrawals to cover up a crime for 
paying a high school football coach to influence Tyrone 
Means' recruitment to Alabama.

The former Crimson Tide booster is due to be sentenced 
Thursday by Judge Daniel Breen of the District Court for 
Western Tennessee. The 64-year-old businessman could 
receive anything from probation to jail time, with a 
maximum penalty of 15 years in prison and $750,000 in 
fines, though federal guidelines call for a lesser 
sentence.

Breen will also rule on motions for a new trial and 
judgment of acquittal. Following sentencing, Young's 
attorneys are expected to immediately appeal.

Reach Christopher Walsh at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or at (205) 
722-0196. 



___
RTF mailing list
RTF@rolltidefan.net
http://rolltidefan.net/mailman/listinfo/rtf_rolltidefan.net


Re: [RollTideFan] Cottrell: Culpepper attorneys paid for by NCAA

2005-06-07 Thread Pat Smoot

Now that is some good shit right there.

- Original Message - 
From: Jeff Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RollTideFan-The University of Alabama Athletics Discussion List 
RTF@rolltidefan.net

Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:53 PM
Subject: [RollTideFan] Cottrell: Culpepper attorneys paid for by NCAA


TUSCALOOSA | Attorneys for former University of Alabama assistant football 
coaches Ronnie Cottrell and Ivy Williams have asked for an order to force 
defendant Tom Culpepper to produce a document they believe will show that 
his legal fees are being paid by the National Collegiate Athletic 
Association.


In the motion seeking the order, lawyers for Cottrell and Williams claim 
that such an agreement between the NCAA and Culpepper would clearly result 
in bias[ed] testimony.


According to court documents, the plaintiffs believe such an agreement was 
reached on or around Nov. 15, 2004.


Cottrell and Williams are suing the NCAA and others, including Culpepper, 
for defamation after they were fired in the wake of a recruiting scandal.


The motion claims: The defendants (Culpepper, the NCAA et al) base their 
decision not to produce the confidentiality agreement on erroneous 
conclusions of law and attempts to apply the Alabama Rules of Evidence to 
discovery.


The plaintiffs are seeking $15 million in compensatory damages and $45 
million in punitive damages after being identified in an NCAA 
investigation, but later cleared.


According to records released in the Logan Young criminal case in Memphis, 
Culpepper was a key secret witness for the NCAA in building its case 
against Alabama along with Tennessee coach Phillip Fulmer.


Culpepper's three-year contract to provide Alabama with video content of 
potential high school recruits concluded this past season.


In early May, both Culpepper and the NCAA filed motions before Tuscaloosa 
County Circuit Court Judge Steve Wilson for summary judgment because 
plaintiffs, as public figures cannot establish through clear and 
convincing evidence that any of the NCAA defendant's statements were made 
with 'actual malice' needed to sustain those claims.


A hearing on the matter has been scheduled for June 23.

Another hearing regarding the motions to compel will be held the following 
day, June 24.


The case is scheduled for a jury trial beginning July 11.

The initial motion to compel against Culpepper was filed on May 23.

In its response, attorneys for the NCAA argued that the request seeks 
information that is immaterial, irrelevant and not reasonably calculated 
to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence. This defendant also 
objects to this request for production to the extent that it seeks 
information that is personal, confidential and/or protected from 
disclosure pursuant to the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure.


The defense also contended that discovery of the agreement would have a 
chilling effect on the settlement negotiations - which plaintiffs denied.


An additional motion against other defendants, including the NCAA, was 
filed Tuesday. In it, part of Rule 8 of the Alabama Rules of Evidence was 
highlighted: This rule also does not require exclusion when the evidence 
is offered for another purpose, such as proving bias or prejudice of a 
witness ..


Culpepper is represented by Birmingham's John Scott, who could not be 
reached for comment. His firm, Starnes and Atchison, also represented the 
university in the initial stages of the lawsuit.


In February, Young was convicted on four counts of conspiracy, crossing 
state lines to commit racketeering and arranging bank withdrawals to cover 
up a crime for paying a high school football coach to influence Tyrone 
Means' recruitment to Alabama.


The former Crimson Tide booster is due to be sentenced Thursday by Judge 
Daniel Breen of the District Court for Western Tennessee. The 64-year-old 
businessman could receive anything from probation to jail time, with a 
maximum penalty of 15 years in prison and $750,000 in fines, though 
federal guidelines call for a lesser sentence.


Breen will also rule on motions for a new trial and judgment of acquittal. 
Following sentencing, Young's attorneys are expected to immediately 
appeal.


Reach Christopher Walsh at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or at 
(205) 722-0196.



___
RTF mailing list
RTF@rolltidefan.net
http://rolltidefan.net/mailman/listinfo/rtf_rolltidefan.net





___
RTF mailing list
RTF@rolltidefan.net
http://rolltidefan.net/mailman/listinfo/rtf_rolltidefan.net