Re: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)

2001-10-27 Thread Johnny Coste

ANOTHER advantage to Netscape is that it doesn't broadcast your secret information to
those web owners that want to retrieve it!

Rick McMahan wrote:
 
 AGREED 100%! I decided to give Netscape mail a try for one day (version
 6.1). Outlook 2K may not be the greatest internet email app, but it sure as
 heck runs cycles around Netscape. The ONLY time I'd ever use Netscape is
 when sending a link longer than 80 characters so the reader doesn't have to
 copy and paste the link. JMHO - FWIW...Rick
 
  -Original Message-
  Then Mike Laborde replied
 
  Can you say, HELL NO!?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rick McMahan
 
  I guess we all need to switch to Netscape, huh :)
 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a BLANK subject line and the single word UNSUBSCRIBE (without the quotes) in 
the body or visit http://www.RollTideFan.net
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
a BLANK subject line and the single word UNSUBSCRIBE (without the quotes) in the 
body or visit http://www.RollTideFan.net



RE: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)

2001-10-27 Thread Rick McMahan


Clue me in Johnny, what do you mean, broadcast secret information?


 -Original Message-
 From: Johnny Coste
 
 
 ANOTHER advantage to Netscape is that it doesn't broadcast your 
 secret information to
 those web owners that want to retrieve it!
 

To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
a BLANK subject line and the single word UNSUBSCRIBE (without the quotes) in the 
body or visit http://www.RollTideFan.net



Re: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)

2001-10-27 Thread Phillip L. Harbison

Johnny Coste wrote:
 ANOTHER advantage to Netscape is that it doesn't broadcast your
 secret information to those web owners that want to retrieve it!

Netscape also supports almost every flavor of UNIX including
Linux.  Not that I would run IE, OE, or any other microsnot
product even if they were available.  My home and office are
both Microsoft-Free Zones (tm).

-- 
Phil Harbison
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
a BLANK subject line and the single word UNSUBSCRIBE (without the quotes) in the 
body or visit http://www.RollTideFan.net



Re: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)

2001-10-27 Thread Thats my final Answer

You must have a 200 gig harddrive to hold all that
Data ! 
--- Jeff Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Don't worry, Hugh. All of your data is in the RTF
 archives.
 
 Slef
 
   -Original Message-
   From: William H Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Date: Saturday, October 27, 2001 6:02 PM
   Subject: Re: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K
 (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)
 
 
 
   Hugh - you are a brave man to be running Win XP
 before it has been
   thoroughly investigated by the tech community. 
 Back up your data.
 
 
 


=


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
a BLANK subject line and the single word UNSUBSCRIBE (without the quotes) in the 
body or visit http://www.RollTideFan.net



RE: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)

2001-10-27 Thread Thats my final Answer

I've been running XP for 6 months !  Can someone tell
me where the Wolfcrack filter is  located ?
--- Hugh Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Windows XP was released to the public two days ago,
 you bumbling fool.
 It's BEEN *thoroughly* investigated by the tech
 community!
  
  
 -Original Message-
 Don't worry, Hugh. All of your data is in the RTF
 archives.
  Hugh - you are a brave man to be running Win XP
 before it has been
 thoroughly investigated by the tech community.  Back
 up your data.
 


=


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
a BLANK subject line and the single word UNSUBSCRIBE (without the quotes) in the 
body or visit http://www.RollTideFan.net



Re: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)

2001-10-27 Thread Jeff Todd



Wolfie,

Be nice, or be gone!

Jeff

  -Original Message-From: 
  Hugh Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 
  Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:23 PMSubject: RE: [RollTideFan] 
  Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)
  
  Windows XP was 
  released to the public two days ago, you bumbling fool. ItÂ’s BEEN *thoroughly* investigated by the tech 
  community!
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-Don't 
  worry, Hugh. All of your data is in the RTF 
  archives.
  
  Hugh - you are a brave man to be 
  running Win XP before it has beenthoroughly 
  investigated by the tech community. Back up your 
  data.


Re: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)

2001-10-27 Thread William H Evans



LOL - Whatever. They (Microsoft) only finalized the 'gold' code about 
8-10 weeks ago and I have already seen many holes already exposed by writers and 
none fixed by Microsoft.

In addition, you know exactly what I mean: Never, ever trust a XX.0 
release. Always wait for a service pack, unless you don't value your 
work. 

And don't tell me that MS SQL Server 2000 requires Win XP. I know 
better. It prefers Win 2000 and can even be made to run on NT 4.

As for your 'bumbling fool' comment, I am not going toclaim 
'PERSONAL ATTACK! PERSONAL ATTACK!', unlike yourself. I can take 
it.



bill evansHartselle, AL[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 17:24:52 -0500 "Hugh Wolfgang" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Windows XP was 
  released to the public two days ago, you bumbling fool. Its BEEN *thoroughly* investigated by the tech 
  community!
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-Don't 
  worry, Hugh. All of your data is in the RTF 
  archives.
  
  Hugh - you are a brave man to be 
  running Win XP before it has beenthoroughly 
  investigated by the tech community. Back up your 
  data.
  


RE: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)

2001-10-27 Thread Hugh Wolfgang











First off: My
apology to the RTF membership for arguing with Hugh. I *know*
better.



Please accept my apologies for referring to
you as a bumbling fool, Bill. I
interpreted your comments concerning running XP to be thinking that I was
running a beta (which I was, at one time).
The released product is MUCH more stable than the betas were. 















Service Patches on Win 2k (Not to be confused with
'Patches' by Jerry Reed):Since I am not running XP to run a 'Windows
Update' on, I would have had to have read about it to have even known they
existed. I need to be more up to date than that. There have been
three complete computing revolutions since Thursday.



There have? Please explain what the three are.







The
sheer volume of patches available should be a big clue that it isn't stable
yet, Hugh.



Actually, youre right about that
but the
number of patches is actually LESS than was available for Windows 2000 upon its
release to the public (not to be confused with Release to Manufacturing). XP is MORE stable that 2000 was upon
release. Is it 100% stable? Heck no. Neither is 2000 though. And just FYI
XP has better drivers for my hardware than 2000 ever had (which is what I get
for not upgrading my sound card when Creative ran the chip manufacturer out of
business). Windows 2000 was never
really all that stable for me, for some reason. I dont know why. 







Win
XP = Version 5.1?: This is bammer math, isn't it
Phil? If NT 4/Win 95 are loosely considered version 4, and Win ME/Win
2000 are loosely considered version 5, wouldn't you consider the union of ME/2K
version 6?



Youd THINK so, but Im
referring to the version number returned by the ver
command from a cmd.exe prompt. I
dont know why they didnt call it 6.0 perhaps because its
a minor upgrade when compared with the 95 to 98 upgrade, or the
NT4-2000 upgrade.







SQL
Server: Reread what I said. You agreed with me and called it a 'new one'.



What I meant by thats a new
one was the concept of XP being required for SQL Server 2000. Ive never claimed that SQL 2000
required XP, and dont know anyone who has. Thats all I meant.

















Personal
Attack: Yes, whatever floats my boat. I would rather be thick skinned
than go crying to Mama every time someone disagrees with me. That *is* my
choice, just as only you can choose what you will do.



Sometimes choices are made for us,
Bill. But in that respect, youre
right. As I said above, though, I
did not intend the bumbling fool comment to be an attack as such
just that if you didnt know XP had been released, well, where have you
been for the last two days? 











Since
you called me a 'bumbling fool', let me ask you this: Did you read *any* of the
replies to your e-mail last week? Just wondering.



To be
perfectly honest, I dont know which e-mail youre referring to,
but its a good bet I only read a small percentage of them. I dont have the luxury of being
able to read and respond to each and every message I get these days (stop
saying Thank God lol) I
selectively read them, in fact, most of the time.
















RE: [RollTideFan] Netscape vs Outlook 2K (non-Bama)(ANOTHER advantage)

2001-10-27 Thread Hugh Wolfgang









Youre showing my youth (or my age,
one), since I dont remember that song J





-Original Message-
Maybe it's his coat of many colors ala Dolly Parton.
(remember the song?)