Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
Stewart, Thanks, that works, approved. Cheers, Jeff From: Stewart Bryant Date: Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 12:50 To: Jeff Tantsura , RTGWG Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs' , Subject: Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync Submitted as draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-timer-param-sync as requested by Les in WG adoption poll. I have made no other changes. I will check through to see if there were any other comments that need addressing, but it is always good to baseline with the same text that went into the WG adoption poll. Hopefully the chairs are OK with the new name and the approach. - Stewart On 25/10/2017 22:25, Jeff Tantsura wrote: Dear RTGWG, The draft has been adopted as the working group draft. Authors – please re-publish. Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura Date: Friday, August 4, 2017 at 12:46 To: RTGWG Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs' , Subject: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync as the working group document. WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have addressed all the comments received. Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
Submitted as draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-timer-param-sync as requested by Les in WG adoption poll. I have made no other changes. I will check through to see if there were any other comments that need addressing, but it is always good to baseline with the same text that went into the WG adoption poll. Hopefully the chairs are OK with the new name and the approach. - Stewart On 25/10/2017 22:25, Jeff Tantsura wrote: Dear RTGWG, The draft has been adopted as the working group draft. Authors – please re-publish. Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura Date: Friday, August 4, 2017 at 12:46 To: RTGWG Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs' , Subject: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync as the working group document. WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have addressed all the comments received. Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
Dear RTGWG, The draft has been adopted as the working group draft. Authors – please re-publish. Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura Date: Friday, August 4, 2017 at 12:46 To: RTGWG Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs' , Subject: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync as the working group document. WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have addressed all the comments received. Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
RE: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
Dear RTGWG, I am a co-author, and I support the draft. I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Chris -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 2:46 PM To: RTGWG Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs' ; draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-s...@ietf.org Subject: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync as the working group document. WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have addressed all the comments received. Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
I’m Ok with this approach. When/if the draft gets adopted the new version would be published with the new name. Cheers, Jeff P.S. Stewart – Unless you have changed your name to “Gmail”, you might want to change it to reflect your real name ;-) -Original Message- From: Gmail Date: Friday, August 4, 2017 at 14:48 To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Cc: Jeff Tantsura , RTGWG , "draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-s...@ietf.org" , rtgwg-chairs Subject: Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync NP, we should also change the draft name, but suggest that is done when the adoption poll completes. Stewart Sent from my iPad > On 4 Aug 2017, at 22:44, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > > I appreciate that the authors have modified the draft in response to some comments I made - and I believe the changes satisfy my concerns. > > I support WG adoption with one significant caveat - the title of the document needs to be modified to accurately reflect the scope of the revised draft. This is now confined to defining how to advertise "routing timer parameters" - it is no longer a generalized "any flavor of routing parameter" - which is one of the points I made in my objections. > > Please modify the name to accurately reflect the redefined scope. > > Les > > >> -Original Message- >> From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura >> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 12:46 PM >> To: RTGWG >> Cc: draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-s...@ietf.org; 'rtgwg-chairs' >> Subject: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync >> >> Dear RTGWG, >> >> The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for draft-bryant-rtgwg- >> param-sync as the working group document. >> >> WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have >> addressed all the comments received. >> Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017. >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this >> email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The >> response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not >> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each >> author and each individual that has contributed to the document. >> >> Cheers, >> Jeff >> >> >> >> ___ >> rtgwg mailing list >> rtgwg@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
NP, we should also change the draft name, but suggest that is done when the adoption poll completes. Stewart Sent from my iPad > On 4 Aug 2017, at 22:44, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > > I appreciate that the authors have modified the draft in response to some > comments I made - and I believe the changes satisfy my concerns. > > I support WG adoption with one significant caveat - the title of the document > needs to be modified to accurately reflect the scope of the revised draft. > This is now confined to defining how to advertise "routing timer parameters" > - it is no longer a generalized "any flavor of routing parameter" - which is > one of the points I made in my objections. > > Please modify the name to accurately reflect the redefined scope. > > Les > > >> -Original Message- >> From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura >> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 12:46 PM >> To: RTGWG >> Cc: draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-s...@ietf.org; 'rtgwg-chairs' >> Subject: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync >> >> Dear RTGWG, >> >> The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for draft-bryant-rtgwg- >> param-sync as the working group document. >> >> WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have >> addressed all the comments received. >> Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017. >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this >> email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The >> response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not >> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each >> author and each individual that has contributed to the document. >> >> Cheers, >> Jeff >> >> >> >> ___ >> rtgwg mailing list >> rtgwg@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
RE: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
I appreciate that the authors have modified the draft in response to some comments I made - and I believe the changes satisfy my concerns. I support WG adoption with one significant caveat - the title of the document needs to be modified to accurately reflect the scope of the revised draft. This is now confined to defining how to advertise "routing timer parameters" - it is no longer a generalized "any flavor of routing parameter" - which is one of the points I made in my objections. Please modify the name to accurately reflect the redefined scope. Les > -Original Message- > From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 12:46 PM > To: RTGWG > Cc: draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-s...@ietf.org; 'rtgwg-chairs' > Subject: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync > > Dear RTGWG, > > The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for draft-bryant-rtgwg- > param-sync as the working group document. > > WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have > addressed all the comments received. > Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this > email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The > response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not > advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each > author and each individual that has contributed to the document. > > Cheers, > Jeff > > > > ___ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
I’ve read the draft, and it’s useful functionality. I support its adoption. Cheers, Andy On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > Dear RTGWG, > > The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for > draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync as the working group document. > > WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have > addressed all the comments received. > Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The > response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not > advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each > author and each individual that has contributed to the document. > > Cheers, > Jeff > > > > ___ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
