Re: [Rails-core] [ANN] Rails 3.2.7.rc1 has been released!
Besides the update_attribute deprecation, everything works just fine. On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas rr.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Em 23-07-2012 18:57, Aaron Patterson escreveu: Hi everyone! I've pushed a release candidate for Rails 3.2.7. Please try it out! If you find any bugs present in the 3.2.7 release candidate that where not present in the 3.2.6 release, please report them to the Rails Core mailing list at here: https://groups.google.com/**group/rubyonrails-core/https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/ We do not want to break your application, so please take this opportunity to give the release candidate a try and report back! Please find the list of changes in each gem's CHANGELOGE on the release branch here: https://github.com/rails/**rails/tree/3-2-relhttps://github.com/rails/rails/tree/3-2-rel A more comprehensive list of changes can be found here: https://github.com/rails/**rails/compare/v3.2.6...v3.2.7.**rc1https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v3.2.6...v3.2.7.rc1 If no show stopping bugs have been reported, I will release 3.2.7 final on Thursday the 26th (PDT). Thanks! 333 Everything is green here both in my personal site (which has no test at all :P ) and in the application I'm developing/maintaining. But I should notice I'm not using AR so I can't tell you about it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.**comrubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.comrubyonrails-core%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/rubyonrails-core?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
[Rails-core] Behavior of first_or_create
I just ran across a weird glitch (IMHO) in find_or_create. The arguments passed to it are *not* added to the conditions for the 'first' part. This is odd, given that it's intended to replace find_or_create_by_* methods, which *did* use the specified values as conditions. I'm unsure on whether this behavior is entirely undesirable, but it's definitely not what I had expected in my use case (ensuring that a join table record exists). Perhaps there should be a variant (find_or_create_exactly, perhaps?) that uses the supplied attributes as additional conditions. If nothing else, the documentation should be updated to reflect this scenario - the last case in the examples *almost* describes this scenario, but the block form used there makes it unclear what: User.where(:first_name = 'Scarlett').first_or_create(:last_name = O'Hara) would do. I also found that DataMapper implements the behavior I was expecting in their first_or_create method: https://github.com/datamapper/dm-core/blob/master/lib/dm-core/model.rb#L448 Thoughts? --Matt Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
Re: [Rails-core] Behavior of first_or_create
I would definitely expect User.where(:first_name = 'Scarlett').first_or_create(:last_name = O'Hara) to call User.create(:first_name = 'Scarlett', :last_name = O'Hara) if that's not what's happening then I think it's a bug and should be fixed. Matt, do you have a minimal app that shows the problem? I would like to write a test case for Rails that shows this strange behavior. On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Matt Jones al2o...@gmail.com wrote: I just ran across a weird glitch (IMHO) in find_or_create. The arguments passed to it are *not* added to the conditions for the 'first' part. This is odd, given that it's intended to replace find_or_create_by_* methods, which *did* use the specified values as conditions. I'm unsure on whether this behavior is entirely undesirable, but it's definitely not what I had expected in my use case (ensuring that a join table record exists). Perhaps there should be a variant (find_or_create_exactly, perhaps?) that uses the supplied attributes as additional conditions. If nothing else, the documentation should be updated to reflect this scenario - the last case in the examples *almost* describes this scenario, but the block form used there makes it unclear what: User.where(:first_name = 'Scarlett').first_or_create(:last_name = O'Hara) would do. I also found that DataMapper implements the behavior I was expecting in their first_or_create method: https://github.com/datamapper/dm-core/blob/master/lib/dm-core/model.rb#L448 Thoughts? --Matt Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
Re: [Rails-core] Behavior of first_or_create
On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Andrés Mejía wrote: I would definitely expect User.where(:first_name = 'Scarlett').first_or_create(:last_name = O'Hara) to call User.create(:first_name = 'Scarlett', :last_name = O'Hara) if that's not what's happening then I think it's a bug and should be fixed. Matt, do you have a minimal app that shows the problem? I would like to write a test case for Rails that shows this strange behavior. Nope, that's not exactly what I observed; I'll try again. That code *does* call the create correctly, if there are no users with the correct first_name. The confusing part to me was that it wasn't quite the same as this: User.where(:first_name = 'Scarlett').find_or_create_by_last_name(O'Hara) The latter includes a condition on last_name in the find, where the former does not. Given that the dynamic form is deprecated (targeted for removal in 4.1 - see active_record_deprecated_finders for details), it's worth either matching the old behavior or clearly documenting the difference to avoid confused upgraders. --Matt Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
Re: [Rails-core] Behavior of first_or_create
On 24/07/12 21:29, Matt Jones wrote: On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Andrés Mejía wrote: I would definitely expect User.where(:first_name = 'Scarlett').first_or_create(:last_name = O'Hara) to call User.create(:first_name = 'Scarlett', :last_name = O'Hara) if that's not what's happening then I think it's a bug and should be fixed. Matt, do you have a minimal app that shows the problem? I would like to write a test case for Rails that shows this strange behavior. Nope, that's not exactly what I observed; I'll try again. That code *does* call the create correctly, if there are no users with the correct first_name. The confusing part to me was that it wasn't quite the same as this: User.where(:first_name = 'Scarlett').find_or_create_by_last_name(O'Hara) The latter includes a condition on last_name in the find, where the former does not. This behaviour is intentional. The dynamic version did actually previously take an options hash of stuff that would get passed to create. So: User.where(:first_name = 'Scarlett').find_or_create_by_last_name(O'Hara, :age = 32) would do: User.where(:first_name = Scarlett, :last_name = O'Hara) and then: User.create(:first_name = Scarlett, :last_name = O'Hara, :age = 32) I believe the rationale is simply that you can put all of your conditions in a where() -- http://jonathanleighton.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
[Rails-core] Re: [ANN] Rails 3.2.7.rc1 has been released!
Great! Yet another release that does not include the bug fix test coverage in https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/6654. Hint, hint. :) On Monday, July 23, 2012 2:57:46 PM UTC-7, Aaron Patterson wrote: Hi everyone! I've pushed a release candidate for Rails 3.2.7. Please try it out! If you find any bugs present in the 3.2.7 release candidate that where not present in the 3.2.6 release, please report them to the Rails Core mailing list at here: snip -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/NjC-J00SMfkJ. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
