I think that this is something that would differ incredibly from app to app.
For instance, I would not install Ruby using apt-get myself.
While I like the idea of having it be a Getting Started doc for an app, I
don't think that Rails could come with a cohesive default that would work for
everyone.
-1 to this change.
On 02/01/2013, at 11:52, Николай Шебанов nikolay.sheba...@gmail.com wrote:
Both hands are up. I think, this change can inspire people who work with the
resulting Ruby on Rails project to reference all project's workflow in a
README and keep it up-to-date. It isn't happening currently.
We are supporting our project for more then a year, and only two months ago
we started to edit README. The one which is generated by rails is totally
useless.
воскресенье, 16 декабря 2012 г., 3:36:39 UTC+4 пользователь Oguz Bilgic
написал:
Most of the time I use readme.md file to explain how to properly install the
dependencies and run the application for first time. I use [something
like](https://gist.github.com/3058000) as a README.md scaffold.
Just an idea, What would you guys think about replacing the current readme
with something like this?
https://gist.github.com/3058000
Oguz Bilgic
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Core group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/GwEL7QamEGkJ.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.