[Rails] displaying attribute from related table with a collection_select
I have two tables: Area, AreaType
Area belongs_to :area_type
AreaType has_many :areas
In my view, I'd like to select from a list of Areas, however, instead
of using the :area_type_id attribute, I would like to use the
associated area_type names. Here's what it looks like now:
%= f.collection_select(:area_id, Area.where(:subject_id =
@search.subject_id), :id, :area_type_id, {:include_blank = true} ) %
What I want is:
%= f.collection_select(:area_id, Area.where(:subject_id =
@search.subject_id), :id, area.area_type.name, {:include_blank =
true} ) %
Anyone know how I would go about creating the area.area_type.name
symbol to user here?
Thanks in advance!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: displaying attribute from related table with a collection_select
Well that was easy! After a little trial and error, I created a new
method in the area.rb and used the name of that method in the
collection select :-) Cheers
On Jul 2, 11:48 pm, @demetriusolsen demetri...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have two tables: Area, AreaType
Area belongs_to :area_type
AreaType has_many :areas
In my view, I'd like to select from a list of Areas, however, instead
of using the :area_type_id attribute, I would like to use the
associated area_type names. Here's what it looks like now:
%= f.collection_select(:area_id, Area.where(:subject_id =
@search.subject_id), :id, :area_type_id, {:include_blank = true} ) %
What I want is:
%= f.collection_select(:area_id, Area.where(:subject_id =
@search.subject_id), :id, area.area_type.name, {:include_blank =
true} ) %
Anyone know how I would go about creating the area.area_type.name
symbol to user here?
Thanks in advance!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: ROR Programmers?
Where is it that you need arora people. I'm one and I'm in Melbourne, victoria, AUSTRALIA On Jul 1, 10:31 pm, Brandon bhilliar...@gmail.com wrote: Where is the best place to find programmers? I need a few ROR programmers for a quictoria -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Can't upload files when WEBrick running in daemon mode.
Hi, When running my app in development with WEBrick in daemon mode I get the following error when trying to upload a file: Errno::ENOENT in UploadController#create No such file or directory - public/data/upload/google |Rails.root: /home/resource_portal/website| Application Trace http://localhost:3000/upload# | Framework Trace http://localhost:3000/upload# | Full Trace http://localhost:3000/upload# |app/models/upload.rb:29:in `initialize' app/models/upload.rb:29:in `open' app/models/upload.rb:29:in `filesave' app/controllers/upload_controller.rb:16:in `create' rake-0.8.7/ruby/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.0.3/lib/action_controller/metal/implicit_render.rb:4:in `send_action' rake-0.8.7/ruby/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.0.3/lib/abstract_controller/base.rb:151:in `process_action'| ... I do not get this error when not running in daemon mode. I've googled a bit but can't find a reason. Does anyone have any ideas? Also the reason I want to run in Daemon mode is because I have to host my app on a uni virtual machine, and start the server after logging in with ssh. When I close the ssh connection the server (if not running in background) also seems to get killed. Any ideas as to how I may be able to work around this? Thanks, Jen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Web services - json-rcp
Hello. I am starting to write a web services in RoR, and considering different technologies to use. I am wondering if someone had experience working with json-rcp and what are its (dis)advandages over SOAP and REST. Thank you, Derek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Can't upload files when WEBrick running in daemon mode.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Jen jen.bot...@gmail.com wrote: When running my app in development with WEBrick in daemon mode I get the following error when trying to upload a file: Errno::ENOENT in UploadController#create No such file or directory - public/data/upload/google I do not get this error when not running in daemon mode. I've googled a bit but can't find a reason. Does anyone have any ideas? My guess would be that 'current working directory' doesn't mean the same thing to a daemonized process; how are you specifying the target directory? Regardless... Also the reason I want to run in Daemon mode is ... Why Webrick? It's only intended for desktop development work; you would be better off using e.g. unicorn (my preference) or passenger in a production environment. Alternatively, if those aren't an option, see if you have `screen` on the system you're using (http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/). HTH, -- Hassan Schroeder hassan.schroe...@gmail.com http://about.me/hassanschroeder twitter: @hassan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Does the asset pipeline (RoR 3.1) waste cycles?
With the Ruby on Rails asset pipeline in RoR 3.1, it's unclear if the .coffee and the //= require files get processed only once or with each asset request. For example, I have a file that looks like this: //= require source/main.js.coffee //= require source/second.js.coffee //= require source/third.js.coffee Ideally, the server would compile these to js ONCE, then bundle them, then create a static file. Otherwise it's going to be wasting cycles repeating effort. Can someone clarify what happens? Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Pickhardt (650) 530-0036 pickha...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] when to add validations to database
Normally all my validation is done in my models. Michael Hart in his rails tutorial explains why the uniqueness validation should also be done at the database layer ( http://ruby.railstutorial.org/chapters/modeling-and-viewing-users-one#sec:the_caveat). I am curious if people have experienced other validations that should also be done at the database layer? thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Does the asset pipeline (RoR 3.1) waste cycles?
In a development environment it recompiles the assets on every request. When in production it does it once and adds a hash to the filename for caching. Dieter Lunn http://ubiety.ca On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Jeff Pickhardt pickha...@gmail.com wrote: With the Ruby on Rails asset pipeline in RoR 3.1, it's unclear if the .coffee and the //= require files get processed only once or with each asset request. For example, I have a file that looks like this: //= require source/main.js.coffee //= require source/second.js.coffee //= require source/third.js.coffee Ideally, the server would compile these to js ONCE, then bundle them, then create a static file. Otherwise it's going to be wasting cycles repeating effort. Can someone clarify what happens? Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Pickhardt (650) 530-0036 pickha...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Why does rendered.should have_field pass when it shouldn't?
This is my new.html.erb_spec.rb:
let(:meal) do
mock_model(Meal).as_new_record.as_null_object
end
before(:each) do
assign(:meal, meal)
end
it shows the name text field do
render
rendered.should have_field(:name) # checks for both the label and the
text field... right?
end
it shows the description text area do
pending This passes when it shouldn't
render
rendered.should have_field(:description) # have_field is for text
fields and text areas (w/labels)... right?
end
it shows the ingredients text area do
pending This passes when it shouldn't
render
rendered.should have_field(:ingredients)
end
==
This is my new.html.erb:
!--admin/meals#new--
div id=meal_new
h3New Meal/h3
%= render :partial = form, :locals = { :meal = @meal, :button_name =
Create } %
/div
It renders this partial...
==
The partial - _form.html.erb
%= form_for [:admin, meal] do |f| %
%= f.label :name %
%= f.text_field :name %
!---Nothing about f.text_area :description or ingredients here! --
%= f.submit button_name %
% end %
=
The problem: rendered.should have_field(:description) and the one for
ingredients are passing although I never specify the description /
ingredient text fields or textareas in the form. Why is this? It seems
that the presence of the label and text field for :name is enough to make
any have_field pass...
(have_field DOES test for text fields or text areas, right?)
(why does the documentation basically tell you /nothing/? no example or
anything
http://rubydoc.info/github/jnicklas/capybara/master/Capybara/RSpecMatchers#have_field-instance_method)
Help would be greatly appreciated.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/BqpTVkUheasJ.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Social Networking
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:52 PM, exelstu...@gmail.com exelstu...@gmail.comwrote: Try some of these: https://github.com/insoshi/insoshi#readme http://communityengine.org/ http://lovdbyless.com/ http://www.enginey.com/ Lovd by Less looks pretty good, haven’t had a chance to try it yet tho. hey anybody is using any one from above links ? Thanks amritpalpathakgne.wordpress.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
