Re: [rules-users] Get authorized users rules only into application
Hi Thanks for your reply.There can be any number of users through AD connection. Can I get all the drools user names and authorization rights into my application? Also can I get the user who created the rule as displayed in guvnor into my application. Is there any restlet that can be used? -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-authorized-users-rules-only-into-application-tp959652p962828.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Implementing Timers With Drools Persistence Enabled
Hi Nick, You are absolutely right that the timer is not triggered in CommandBasedStatefulKnowledgeSession (which is used for JPA persistence). I have spent some time to troubleshoot it. There is some finding regarding to this problem. Maybe other experts are willing to solve it. In org.drools.persistence.processinstance.JPASignalManager, when the signal is triggered in method signalEvent(long processInstanceId, String type, Object event), the thread is blocked in commandService.execute(command); I used debugger to trace it, and found that SingleSessionCommandService.execute(GenericCommandT) is synchronized. I think the cause of untriggered timer is due to blocked commandService.execute(command) in JPASignalManager. (I am using drools-5.1.0.M2) On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:09 AM, nanic23 nani...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi cafebabe, Thanks for your comment. I agree with you that work item ids are database primary keys but in this simple (very simple) case I just decided to harcoded as I know for a fact that the work item id is 1 because that is the only work item and each time I run the test the tables are dropped and recreated. So, there is never more than one row in the workItemInfo table and the only row always has 1 as its id. I could have stored the work item id or a work item object as a variable (like you mentioned) but in this case wouldn't make a difference for the timers. Are timers working for you when you use persistence? I do complete work items by workItem.getId() in all my code (other than this simple example :)). My problem is NOT completing the work item, my problem is triggering timers when persistence is enabled. The timers don't even trigger, thing that should happen before even trying to complete the work item. Thanks, Nick. -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Implementing-Timers-With-Drools-Persistence-Enabled-tp923142p961658.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Avoiding loops
Hi Droolers, I'm trying to avoid loops and looking at different possibilities (no-loop, activation-group, lock-on-active, etc.). Scenario I want to avoid: For example, the initial facts trigger *rule 1*, which inserts new facts that will trigger *rule 2*, which will then insert facts that would re-trigger *rule 1*. Possibilities I tried: no-loop - just prevents the re-activation of the same rule lock-on-active - I can't know which rules should have lock-on-active set to true, since I don't know what will be the initial facts. What I'm trying to achieve: All rules in my rule set should execute only once. So, a rule inserts new facts only rules that haven't executed so far, should be activated. Is there a way to do that, let's say 'out-of-the-box', with DRL? Thank you, Leo. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Drools Guvnor Issues : Default Constructors Declaring Dialects
I have successfully converted a previous rules engine project to Drools and was attempting to make the next step by trying out Guvnor for the QA/Testing module. 1)Even though my program executed and ran perfectly in Eclipse, i noticed the testing QA section of Guvnor would crash with my fact models because i did not have a default constructor with no arguments. I made the change, but is this something that is required for Guvnor QA to work properly (all fact models / POJOs MUST have a default no-arg constructor) OR did i just configure Guvnor wrong? I basically solved my problem, just trying to learn why there was a problem to begin with. 2) Also, I noticed that even though the default dialect is java (and not specifying it does not cause any issues in Eclipse), the Guvnor QA section would not understand the rules unless they explicitly have dialect java in their signature. Of course adding it fixes the problem, but again I am trying to learn why. I assumed since it is the default dialect that it would not need to be stated. Is this again just the way Guvnor works (doesn't work) or do i need to configure it a certain way? -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Guvnor-Issues-Default-Constructors-Declaring-Dialects-tp965078p965078.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools Guvnor Issues : Default Constructors Declaring Dialects
Hi, I think that the non-args constructor is required because the classes are instantiated using reflection: Class.forName(...).newInstance(); Best, Esteban Aliverti - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:01 PM, soc.frangis soc.fran...@gmail.com wrote: I have successfully converted a previous rules engine project to Drools and was attempting to make the next step by trying out Guvnor for the QA/Testing module. 1)Even though my program executed and ran perfectly in Eclipse, i noticed the testing QA section of Guvnor would crash with my fact models because i did not have a default constructor with no arguments. I made the change, but is this something that is required for Guvnor QA to work properly (all fact models / POJOs MUST have a default no-arg constructor) OR did i just configure Guvnor wrong? I basically solved my problem, just trying to learn why there was a problem to begin with. 2) Also, I noticed that even though the default dialect is java (and not specifying it does not cause any issues in Eclipse), the Guvnor QA section would not understand the rules unless they explicitly have dialect java in their signature. Of course adding it fixes the problem, but again I am trying to learn why. I assumed since it is the default dialect that it would not need to be stated. Is this again just the way Guvnor works (doesn't work) or do i need to configure it a certain way? -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Guvnor-Issues-Default-Constructors-Declaring-Dialects-tp965078p965078.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Get authorized users rules only into application
Hi Thanks for your reply. I guess I have to use separate guvnor with a single package for each user only. The webdav shows only the packages and snapshots not the authorization details. -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-authorized-users-rules-only-into-application-tp959652p965533.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
