[rules-users] org.hibernate.StaleObjectStateException on aborting process

2011-01-26 Thread Massudi
Running JBoss 6.0. Somewhere inside running JTA transaction:

@Override
public void stopProcess(PropertyObject object)
{
 StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession = 
ProcessHelper.loadSession(Registry.get().getMainProcessName(),  
object.getKnowledgeSessionId());
 ksession.abortProcessInstance(object.getProcessInstanceId());
}

aborting process leads to org.hibernate.StaleObjectStateException:

WARN  [com.arjuna.ats.arjuna] ARJUNA-12125 
TwoPhaseCoordinator.beforeCompletion - failed for SynchronizationImple 
0:c0a801e8:126a:4d3fd283:3d, 
org.hibernate.transaction.synchronization.HibernateSynchronizationImpl@1fa8761 
 : javax.persistence.OptimisticLockException: 
org.hibernate.StaleObjectStateException: Row was updated or deleted by 
another transaction (or unsaved-value mapping was incorrect): 
[org.drools.persistence.session.SessionInfo#13]
 at 
org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.wrapStaleStateException(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:1243)
 
[:3.6.0.Final]
 at 
org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.convert(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:1166)
 
[:3.6.0.Final]
 at 
org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.convert(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:1147)
 
[:3.6.0.Final]
 at 
org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.convert(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:1153)
 
[:3.6.0.Final]
 at 
org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl$3.mapManagedFlushFailure(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:1067)
 
[:3.6.0.Final]
 at 
org.hibernate.transaction.synchronization.CallbackCoordinator.beforeCompletion(CallbackCoordinator.java:122)
 
[:3.6.0.Final]
 at 
org.hibernate.transaction.synchronization.HibernateSynchronizationImpl.beforeCompletion(HibernateSynchronizationImpl.java:51)
 
[:3.6.0.Final]
 at 
com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.resources.arjunacore.SynchronizationImple.beforeCompletion(SynchronizationImple.java:97)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
com.arjuna.ats.arjuna.coordinator.TwoPhaseCoordinator.beforeCompletion(TwoPhaseCoordinator.java:274)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
com.arjuna.ats.arjuna.coordinator.TwoPhaseCoordinator.end(TwoPhaseCoordinator.java:94)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at com.arjuna.ats.arjuna.AtomicAction.commit(AtomicAction.java:159) 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.TransactionImple.commitAndDisassociate(TransactionImple.java:1156)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.BaseTransaction.commit(BaseTransaction.java:119)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
com.arjuna.ats.jbossatx.BaseTransactionManagerDelegate.commit(BaseTransactionManagerDelegate.java:75)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.jboss.tm.usertx.client.ServerVMClientUserTransaction.commit(ServerVMClientUserTransaction.java:162)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
com.infotech.web.util.HibernateSessionRequestFilter.doFilter(HibernateSessionRequestFilter.java:53)
 
[:]
 at 
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:274)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:242)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:275)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityAssociationValve.invoke(SecurityAssociationValve.java:181)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.jboss.modcluster.catalina.CatalinaContext$RequestListenerValve.event(CatalinaContext.java:285)
 
[:1.1.0.Final]
 at 
org.jboss.modcluster.catalina.CatalinaContext$RequestListenerValve.invoke(CatalinaContext.java:261)
 
[:1.1.0.Final]
 at 
org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.JaccContextValve.invoke(JaccContextValve.java:88) 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityContextEstablishmentValve.invoke(SecurityContextEstablishmentValve.java:100)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.jca.CachedConnectionValve.invoke(CachedConnectionValve.java:158)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.request.ActiveRequestResponseCacheValve.invoke(ActiveRequestResponseCacheValve.java:53)
 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:362) 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:877) 
[:6.0.0.20101110-CR1]
 at 
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:653)
 

[rules-users] Large amount of rules deployment

2011-01-26 Thread Benson Fung
Hi,

I have 9000 rules in a DRL file and would like to import to BRMS.  Please
suggest a way to import it efficiently.


Thanks
Benson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] looping over list

2011-01-26 Thread Bruno Freudensprung

Hi,

Maybe can you try the collect keyword? According to what I see in the 
documentation (4.8.3.9. Conditional Element collect) it seems to fit 
your needs.
I'll probably give this a try:

rule Select Officer
ruleflow-group select_officer
no-loop true
salience 20
when
   $processInstance: WorkflowProcessInstance()
   $requestData: RequestData($genre : genre, $cost : cost)
   $sublist : ArrayList()
  from collect( Officer( minimumCost =  $cost, $cost = 
maximumCost ) from $genre)
then
   System.out.println(Hey!);
   List shrunkOfficersWithGenre = $sublist;  
end

Best regards,

Bruno (newbie).


odelyaholiday a écrit :
 I have a list of officers:
 public static final MapString, ListOfficer officersPerGenre = new
 HashMapString, ListOfficer();

 Where the Officer with:

 String name;
 Integer mininumCost;
 Integer maximumCost;

 in officersPerGenre I fill for each genre list of officers.

 In my drools:

 rule Select Officer
 ruleflow-group select_officer
 no-loop true
 salience 20
 when
$processInstance: WorkflowProcessInstance()
$requestData: RequestData();
 then
System.out.println(Hey!);
List officersWithGenre = (List)officers.get($requestData.getGenre());  
  
 end

 Now I need to shrink the officersWithGenre only to officers that
 $requestData.cost is between their mininumCost and maximum cost.

 How do I write it in drools? In java i will simply iterate over the
 collection.


   

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


[rules-users] Clearing an AgendaGroup

2011-01-26 Thread Evert Penninckx

Hi

I have a rule set with two agenda groups. I have a rule with autofocus on
group1. If the rules in group1 are exhausted it activates group2 using
setFocus(). 

rule Active second group
agenda-group group1
auto-focus true
salience -1
when
  eval(true)
then
  drools.setFocus(group2)
end

Now I noticed that while executing rules from group2, rules from group1 were
still being triggerd and executed. 

So I added this to the then clause.

drools.getWorkingMemory().getAgenda().clearAndCancelAgendaGroup(group1)

Alas, it made no difference. Some debugging made clear that after the then
clause the stack contained only MAIN and group2. 

Am I missing some basic notion on agenda groups?




Greetz

Evert

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Clearing-an-AgendaGroup-tp2353014p2353014.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Is Drools appropriate for this app scenario?

2011-01-26 Thread Sebastien Chevalier

@plugtreelabs: First of all, thank you very much for your response and hints. 

@all: As I'm still not quire sure how to realize my scenario:
Please, could someone provide me with some diagrams or architectural
sketches of a typical rules-based e-commerce web application? -- Or at least
point me to online resources on that topic, especially showing the
integration of the RBMS in a web app?

This would really help me out a lot at the moment.

_Recap: 
The main goal is that endusers shall, on the one hand, define almost the
whole set of entities and rules in an initial shop
specification/configuration process, and on the other hand, this set shall
be modifiable later on (primarily through enhancements, not restrictions).
The entity set basically is: customer types, product categories, products,
product packages, customer(type)-to-product(type) price assignments (i.e.
pricing rules), and inter-product/package selection rules, ...all of these
dynamically definable via a WebUI and in a manner appropriate for
non-technical end-users (considering declarative programming a good approach
for this(?)). 

The most dynamic parts will be the multi-dimensional pricing tables in terms
of (a) their schema -- when new pricing parameters (=dimensions) like
delivery distance are added -- and (b) their value contents -- when concrete
prices change. 
Another quite dynamic part will be the inter-product selection rule
specifications from which a smart e-catalog will be generated for the
client-side. Such rules will state sth. like: 
Prod A must always be ordered with Prod B, Prod B can never be ordered
when Package C is selected, and similar.
--

Currently, some high-level architectural layouts of a simple, rules-based
e-commerce web app (Which components are necessary in which place? And which
components are already delivered by Drools?) would be very helpful for me.
 
Thank you very much for your help in advance.

Best regards
  Sebastien

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-Drools-appropriate-for-this-app-scenario-tp2303204p2353169.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Is Drools appropriate for this app scenario?

2011-01-26 Thread Leonardo Gomes
It's pretty old, but you've got some architectural diagrams here:
http://www.infoq.com/articles/Rule-Engines

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Sebastien Chevalier 
sebastien.cheval...@web.de wrote:


 @plugtreelabs: First of all, thank you very much for your response and
 hints.

 @all: As I'm still not quire sure how to realize my scenario:
 Please, could someone provide me with some diagrams or architectural
 sketches of a typical rules-based e-commerce web application? -- Or at
 least
 point me to online resources on that topic, especially showing the
 integration of the RBMS in a web app?

 This would really help me out a lot at the moment.

 _Recap:
 The main goal is that endusers shall, on the one hand, define almost the
 whole set of entities and rules in an initial shop
 specification/configuration process, and on the other hand, this set shall
 be modifiable later on (primarily through enhancements, not restrictions).
 The entity set basically is: customer types, product categories, products,
 product packages, customer(type)-to-product(type) price assignments (i.e.
 pricing rules), and inter-product/package selection rules, ...all of these
 dynamically definable via a WebUI and in a manner appropriate for
 non-technical end-users (considering declarative programming a good
 approach
 for this(?)).

 The most dynamic parts will be the multi-dimensional pricing tables in
 terms
 of (a) their schema -- when new pricing parameters (=dimensions) like
 delivery distance are added -- and (b) their value contents -- when
 concrete
 prices change.
 Another quite dynamic part will be the inter-product selection rule
 specifications from which a smart e-catalog will be generated for the
 client-side. Such rules will state sth. like:
 Prod A must always be ordered with Prod B, Prod B can never be ordered
 when Package C is selected, and similar.
 --

 Currently, some high-level architectural layouts of a simple, rules-based
 e-commerce web app (Which components are necessary in which place? And
 which
 components are already delivered by Drools?) would be very helpful for me.

 Thank you very much for your help in advance.

 Best regards
  Sebastien

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-Drools-appropriate-for-this-app-scenario-tp2303204p2353169.html
 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Is Drools appropriate for this app scenario?

2011-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Schneller
Sebastien,

I have built an e-commerce site [www.stoneside.com] with some if not all
of the things you are talking about. If you go there and design a
product you can see the rules working.

Drools is being used for:
Pricing rules and discounts within a product.
Rules regarding what components of a product can exist with
other components.  [the end-user is custom designing something to
purchase]
Rules determine how to display the product as the end-user
designs their product.
Rules generate the BOM once the user ultimately orders the
product that they designed.

All the rules are managed using excel spreadsheet templates.  We [the
developers] defined the templates and the business enters the rules into
the spreadsheet.  This has worked pretty well.  The biggest hurdle being
defining the templates correctly and populating the initial sets of
rules.  Some of the more complex products have at least 5K rules [across
all 4 areas of rules] that needed to be defined.

So, I think it is appropriate for your app scenario.  You will need to
think about what you need as rules and what those rule 'templates' need
to look like.  

Jeff



-Original Message-
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Sebastien
Chevalier
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:28 AM
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Is Drools appropriate for this app scenario?


@plugtreelabs: First of all, thank you very much for your response and
hints. 

@all: As I'm still not quire sure how to realize my scenario:
Please, could someone provide me with some diagrams or architectural
sketches of a typical rules-based e-commerce web application? -- Or at
least
point me to online resources on that topic, especially showing the
integration of the RBMS in a web app?

This would really help me out a lot at the moment.

_Recap: 
The main goal is that endusers shall, on the one hand, define almost the
whole set of entities and rules in an initial shop
specification/configuration process, and on the other hand, this set
shall
be modifiable later on (primarily through enhancements, not
restrictions).
The entity set basically is: customer types, product categories,
products,
product packages, customer(type)-to-product(type) price assignments
(i.e.
pricing rules), and inter-product/package selection rules, ...all of
these
dynamically definable via a WebUI and in a manner appropriate for
non-technical end-users (considering declarative programming a good
approach
for this(?)). 

The most dynamic parts will be the multi-dimensional pricing tables in
terms
of (a) their schema -- when new pricing parameters (=dimensions) like
delivery distance are added -- and (b) their value contents -- when
concrete
prices change. 
Another quite dynamic part will be the inter-product selection rule
specifications from which a smart e-catalog will be generated for the
client-side. Such rules will state sth. like: 
Prod A must always be ordered with Prod B, Prod B can never be
ordered
when Package C is selected, and similar.
--

Currently, some high-level architectural layouts of a simple,
rules-based
e-commerce web app (Which components are necessary in which place? And
which
components are already delivered by Drools?) would be very helpful for
me.
 
Thank you very much for your help in advance.

Best regards
  Sebastien

-- 
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-Drools-appropriat
e-for-this-app-scenario-tp2303204p2353169.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


[rules-users] Possible bug using from and or

2011-01-26 Thread Evert Penninckx

Hi

This little rule won't compile:

rule Test from and or
dialect mvel
when
$person : Person()
Address( ) from $person.addresses
(Address() or Address())
then
# do stuff
end

BuildError: Unable to build expression for 'from' : [Error: Failed to
compile: 1 compilation error(s): 
 - (1,7) unqualified type in strict mode for: $person]
[Near : {... Unknown }]
 ^
[Line: 1, Column: 0] '$person.addresses(Address() or Address())'

BuildError: Unable to determine the used declarations.
java.lang.Class cannot be cast to org.mvel2.util.MethodStub


This does work

rule Test from and or
dialect mvel
when
$person : Person()
Address( ) from $person.addresses
Address() or Address()
then
# do stuff
end

And this also:

rule Test from and or
dialect mvel
when
$person : Person()
Address( ) from $person.getAddresses()
(Address() or Address())
then
# do stuff
end



Can anybody confirm this as a bug?



Tnx


Evert
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-bug-using-from-and-or-tp235p235.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] How to write a rule that fires when it matches against specific facts in working memory.

2011-01-26 Thread groovenarula

Thanks for outlining the approach, Edson.

Unfortunately, I'm a newbie using drools, so I just need some clarification
on what you mean by 'matchAll is your own accumulate function with the
semantics you described.' ? Do you mean that I have to create a 'custom'
accumulate function ? 

Edson, if that's the case, then I'll try to search for example of creating a
custom function. When I last searched, I did find an example on the
Internet, however, I don't think I found details of how to make the function
available to the rules engine (is it as simple as including the jar in the
classpath or do I need to take addtional steps to use Matchall in drl ?) 

Can you please elaborate for the benefit of a noobie ?

Thanks
Gurvinder

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2354793.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Possible bug using from and or

2011-01-26 Thread Edson Tirelli
   This is an ambiguity inherent to the DRL language. This happens because
the parser has no way of knowing if the (...) following the expression
belong to the expression (i.e., is a method call, where you forgot the ,
between parameters) or if it is not part of the expression. So, we
arbitrarily decided that the parser will always consider the () in this case
as part of the expression, and if it is not a valid syntax, it will raise an
error. You found one way of breaking the ambiguity by adding () on
getAddresses, but you could also do:

   ( Address( ) from $person.addresses )

   or add a ; at the end of the expression:

   Address( ) from $person.addresses;

   It is not a bug, as it is an ambiguity inherent to the language, not the
implementation, but I guess we could have better documentation on that. Just
for the curious, it is the same kind of ambiguity present on java/c++
parsers when you have nested if/else without blocks {}. Ex:

if (...)
   if( ... )
  ...;
else
   ...;

Does the else above belong to the first or second if? The parser has
no way to know that, so they arbitrarily decided that in java/c++ that says
the else belongs to the closest if and my identation above is
misleading...

   Edson

2011/1/26 Evert Penninckx evert.pennin...@gmail.com


 Hi

 This little rule won't compile:

 rule Test from and or
 dialect mvel
 when
$person : Person()
Address( ) from $person.addresses
(Address() or Address())
 then
 # do stuff
 end

 BuildError: Unable to build expression for 'from' : [Error: Failed to
 compile: 1 compilation error(s):
  - (1,7) unqualified type in strict mode for: $person]
 [Near : {... Unknown }]
 ^
 [Line: 1, Column: 0] '$person.addresses(Address() or Address())'

 BuildError: Unable to determine the used declarations.
 java.lang.Class cannot be cast to org.mvel2.util.MethodStub


 This does work

 rule Test from and or
 dialect mvel
 when
$person : Person()
Address( ) from $person.addresses
Address() or Address()
 then
 # do stuff
 end

 And this also:

 rule Test from and or
 dialect mvel
 when
$person : Person()
Address( ) from $person.getAddresses()
(Address() or Address())
 then
 # do stuff
 end



 Can anybody confirm this as a bug?



 Tnx


 Evert
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-bug-using-from-and-or-tp235p235.html
 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




-- 
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Doubt in converting .brl to .drl format in java

2011-01-26 Thread Bruno Freudensprung


Hi,

Don't know if it may help but I've just had a similar error 
(java.lang.RuntimeException: 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CannotResolveClassException: definitions 
: definitions) when adding a bpmn2 rule flow file (an XML file) as a BRL 
resource in a KnowledgeBuilder (no comment... :-)).


My2cts,

Bruno.

Kamal Thiyagarajan a écrit :



Hello,

I had try to convert .brl file to .drl format using java code i got an 
error in conversion. my java code is


String fileName = c:/Sampleguide.brl;
File file = new File(fileName);
//System.out.println(hello);
String content = FileUtils.readFileToString(file);
System.out.println(content);
BRXMLPersistence read = (BRXMLPersistence) 
BRXMLPersistence.getInstance();
BRDRLPersistence write = (BRDRLPersistence) 
BRDRLPersistence.getInstance();

//BRDRLPersistence.getInstance();
String outputDRL = write.marshal(read.unmarshal(content));
System.out.println(outputDRL);

I got  error like this

 com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: metadataList 
: metadataList : metadataList : metadataList

 Debugging information 
message : metadataList : metadataList
cause-exception : 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CannotResolveClassException

cause-message   : metadataList : metadataList
class   : org.drools.brms.client.modeldriven.brl.RuleModel
required-type   : org.drools.brms.client.modeldriven.brl.RuleModel
path: /rule/metadataList
---
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.convert(TreeUnmarshaller.java:89)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceUnmarshaller.convert(AbstractReferenceUnmarshaller.java:63)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.convertAnother(TreeUnmarshaller.java:76)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.convertAnother(TreeUnmarshaller.java:60)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.start(TreeUnmarshaller.java:137)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractTreeMarshallingStrategy.unmarshal(AbstractTreeMarshallingStrategy.java:33)

at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.unmarshal(XStream.java:923)
at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.unmarshal(XStream.java:909)
at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.fromXML(XStream.java:853)
at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.fromXML(XStream.java:845)
at 
org.drools.brms.server.util.BRXMLPersistence.unmarshal(BRXMLPersistence.java:91)

at com.sample.DroolsTest.main(DroolsTest.java:30)
Caused by: 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CannotResolveClassException: 
metadataList : metadataList
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.DefaultMapper.realClass(DefaultMapper.java:68)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.DynamicProxyMapper.realClass(DynamicProxyMapper.java:71)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.PackageAliasingMapper.realClass(PackageAliasingMapper.java:88)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.ClassAliasingMapper.realClass(ClassAliasingMapper.java:86)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.ArrayMapper.realClass(ArrayMapper.java:96)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CachingMapper.realClass(CachingMapper.java:52)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.AbstractReflectionConverter.determineType(AbstractReflectionConverter.java:347)
at 
com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.AbstractReflectionConverter.doUnmarshal(AbstractReflectionConverter.java:208)
at 

[rules-users] Guvnor UI bugs?

2011-01-26 Thread jlegelis

I'm running Drools 5.1.1 on JDK 1.6, client is Chrome on XP.   I've noticed
quite a few UI bugs in Guvnor, most feel like browser caching issues,
setter/getter issues etc.  For example, when creating test scenarios,
changing the values in the 'given' clause then running the scenario results
in the 'old' values being sent.  Anybody else notice this or have any
workarounds?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-UI-bugs-tp2356106p2356106.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Clearing an AgendaGroup

2011-01-26 Thread Michael Anstis
Were the rules in Agenda Group group1 executed, or merely evaluated?

Agenda Group controls which activations on the agenda are executed, rules in
all Agenda Groups will continue to be evaluated.

Thanks,

Mike

On 26 January 2011 10:52, Evert Penninckx evert.pennin...@gmail.com wrote:


 Hi

 I have a rule set with two agenda groups. I have a rule with autofocus on
 group1. If the rules in group1 are exhausted it activates group2 using
 setFocus().

 rule Active second group
 agenda-group group1
 auto-focus true
 salience -1
 when
  eval(true)
 then
  drools.setFocus(group2)
 end

 Now I noticed that while executing rules from group2, rules from group1
 were
 still being triggerd and executed.

 So I added this to the then clause.

 drools.getWorkingMemory().getAgenda().clearAndCancelAgendaGroup(group1)

 Alas, it made no difference. Some debugging made clear that after the then
 clause the stack contained only MAIN and group2.

 Am I missing some basic notion on agenda groups?




 Greetz

 Evert

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Clearing-an-AgendaGroup-tp2353014p2353014.html
 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] How to write a rule that fires when it matches against specific facts in working memory.

2011-01-26 Thread Wolfgang Laun
Accumulate functions are very well documented in the Expert manual. Look for
a section titled Accumulate Functions.

You could also use accumulate with all the steps in inline code, which is
documented in the preceding section.

-W



On 26 January 2011 16:50, groovenarula gnaru...@la-z-boy.com wrote:


 Thanks for outlining the approach, Edson.

 Unfortunately, I'm a newbie using drools, so I just need some clarification
 on what you mean by 'matchAll is your own accumulate function with the
 semantics you described.' ? Do you mean that I have to create a 'custom'
 accumulate function ?

 Edson, if that's the case, then I'll try to search for example of creating
 a
 custom function. When I last searched, I did find an example on the
 Internet, however, I don't think I found details of how to make the
 function
 available to the rules engine (is it as simple as including the jar in the
 classpath or do I need to take addtional steps to use Matchall in drl ?)

 Can you please elaborate for the benefit of a noobie ?

 Thanks
 Gurvinder

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2354793.html
 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Clearing an AgendaGroup

2011-01-26 Thread Evert Penninckx


manstis wrote:
 
 Were the rules in Agenda Group group1 executed, or merely evaluated?
 
 Agenda Group controls which activations on the agenda are executed, rules
 in
 all Agenda Groups will continue to be evaluated.
 

I figured as much. But they're still being fired. 

I haven't had the chance to test this on a simple case. My ruleset has for
now about 5 to 10 rules in group1 and about 15 in group2. Group1 evaluates
the initial state of the working memory and signals possible inconsistencies
(inserted as message facts in drool). The second group modifies facts in the
working memory. The final state is expected to be inconsistent in regard to
the consistency checks on the initial state. Yet, I see warnings being
entered in drools after group2 modified facts 

I could consider a rule flow, but the checks are only there to debug
abnormal behaviour and not related to a business process or something.  I'd
really want to keep it hidden from the java-code calling the drools rules. 



Grtz

E.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Clearing-an-AgendaGroup-tp2353014p2356753.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Possible bug using from and or

2011-01-26 Thread Evert Penninckx

Ok thanks for the info. The drools error mesages are a bit vague from time to
time ;-)


e.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-bug-using-from-and-or-tp235p2356762.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


[rules-users] proper syntax for multiple function calls within LHS

2011-01-26 Thread garySFCA844

hello,

I'm a newbie to Drools.  I'm trying to write a rule that performs some math,
without resorting to a function or eval. I searched the forum but found lots
of posts on nested function calls,etc but not what I was searching for.

For simplicity, lets assume I have the following classes

public class ONE{
double A
double B
double C
}

public class TWO{
double D
double E
}

where A, B, C, D, E are themselves calculated values (apr, price at some
date, etc)

1. What does the LHS of a rule that compares A  D look like?

2. What does the LHS of a rule that compares A+B  C look like?

3. What does the LHS of a rule that compares A+D  C look like?


I apologize in advance if this was covered already.

Thanks. 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/proper-syntax-for-multiple-function-calls-within-LHS-tp2359020p2359020.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] How to write a rule that fires when it matches against specific facts in working memory.

2011-01-26 Thread groovenarula

Thanks Wolfgang. I found it. I Work on it and let you'll know how it goes.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Wolfgang Laun-2 [via Drools - Java Rules Engine] 
ml-node+2356705-1292265879-9...@n3.nabble.com wrote:

 Accumulate functions are very well documented in the Expert manual. Look for 
 a section titled Accumulate Functions.
 
 You could also use accumulate with all the steps in inline code, which is 
 documented in the preceding section.
 
 -W
 
 
 
 On 26 January 2011 16:50, groovenarula [hidden email] wrote:
 
 Thanks for outlining the approach, Edson.
 
 Unfortunately, I'm a newbie using drools, so I just need some clarification
 on what you mean by 'matchAll is your own accumulate function with the
 semantics you described.' ? Do you mean that I have to create a 'custom'
 accumulate function ?
 
 Edson, if that's the case, then I'll try to search for example of creating a
 custom function. When I last searched, I did find an example on the
 Internet, however, I don't think I found details of how to make the function
 available to the rules engine (is it as simple as including the jar in the
 classpath or do I need to take addtional steps to use Matchall in drl ?)
 
 Can you please elaborate for the benefit of a noobie ?
 
 Thanks
 Gurvinder
 
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2354793.html
 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 [hidden email]
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
 
 
 ___ 
 rules-users mailing list 
 [hidden email] 
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
 
 
 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion 
 below:
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2356705.html
 To unsubscribe from How to write a rule that fires when it matches against 
 specific facts in working memory., click here.

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2359225.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] How to write a rule that fires when it matches against specific facts in working memory.

2011-01-26 Thread Edson Tirelli
   I suggest you use this as a base for your implementation, as I think it
will help you:

https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm/blob/master/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/base/accumulators/CollectSetAccumulateFunction.java

https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm/blob/master/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/base/accumulators/CollectSetAccumulateFunction.java
Edson

2011/1/26 groovenarula gnaru...@la-z-boy.com

 Thanks Wolfgang. I found it. I Work on it and let you'll know how it goes.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Wolfgang Laun-2 [via Drools - Java Rules
 Engine] [hidden 
 email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2359225i=0
 wrote:

 Accumulate functions are very well documented in the Expert manual. Look
 for a section titled Accumulate Functions.

 You could also use accumulate with all the steps in inline code, which is
 documented in the preceding section.

 -W



 On 26 January 2011 16:50, groovenarula [hidden 
 email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2356705i=0by-user=t
  wrote:


 Thanks for outlining the approach, Edson.

 Unfortunately, I'm a newbie using drools, so I just need some
 clarification
 on what you mean by 'matchAll is your own accumulate function with the
 semantics you described.' ? Do you mean that I have to create a 'custom'
 accumulate function ?

 Edson, if that's the case, then I'll try to search for example of creating
 a
 custom function. When I last searched, I did find an example on the
 Internet, however, I don't think I found details of how to make the
 function
 available to the rules engine (is it as simple as including the jar in the
 classpath or do I need to take addtional steps to use Matchall in drl ?)

 Can you please elaborate for the benefit of a noobie ?

 Thanks
 Gurvinder

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2354793.html?by-user=tby-user=t
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2354793.htmlhttp://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2354793.html?by-user=t
 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 [hidden 
 email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2356705i=1by-user=t

  https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2356705i=2by-user=t
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


 --
  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
 below:
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2356705.html?by-user=t
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2356705.htmlhttp://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2356705.html?by-user=t
  To unsubscribe from How to write a rule that fires when it matches against
 specific facts in working memory., click 
 herehttp://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=2294599code=Z25hcnVsYTFAbGEtei1ib3kuY29tfDIyOTQ1OTl8MjAzMTM1NDY2Mw==by-user=t.



 --
 View this message in context: Re: How to write a rule that fires when it
 matches against specific facts in working 
 memory.http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2359225.html

 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list 
 archivehttp://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-f47000.htmlat
  Nabble.com.

 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




-- 
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] How to write a rule that fires when it matches against specific facts in working memory.

2011-01-26 Thread groovenarula

Edson,

This surely looks like a great template to base my implementation - it looks 
like an great starting point.

Gurvinder



-Original Message-
From: Edson Tirelli-4 [via Drools - Java Rules Engine] 
[mailto:ml-node+2359987-1512063982-9...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Wed 1/26/2011 11:44 PM
To: Gurvinder Narula1
Subject: Re: How to write a rule that fires when it matches against specific 
facts in working memory.
 

   I suggest you use this as a base for your implementation, as I think it 
will help you:

https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm/blob/master/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/base/accumulators/CollectSetAccumulateFunction.java

https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm/blob/master/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/base/accumulators/CollectSetAccumulateFunction.java
 Â Â  Edson


2011/1/26 groovenarula [hidden email]


Thanks Wolfgang. I found it. I Work on it and let you'll know how it 
goes.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Wolfgang Laun-2 [via Drools - Java Rules 
Engine] [hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2359225i=0 
 wrote:



Accumulate functions are very well documented in the Expert 
manual. Look for a section titled Accumulate Functions.

You could also use accumulate with all the steps in inline 
code, which is documented in the preceding section.

-W




On 26 January 2011 16:50, groovenarula [hidden email] 
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2356705i=0by-user=t  wrote:



Thanks for outlining the approach, Edson.

Unfortunately, I'm a newbie using drools, so I just 
need some clarification
on what you mean by 'matchAll is your own accumulate 
function with the
semantics you described.' ? Do you mean that I have to 
create a 'custom'
accumulate function ?

Edson, if that's the case, then I'll try to search for 
example of creating a
custom function. When I last searched, I did find an 
example on the
Internet, however, I don't think I found details of how 
to make the function
available to the rules engine (is it as simple as 
including the jar in the
classpath or do I need to take addtional steps to use 
Matchall in drl ?)

Can you please elaborate for the benefit of a noobie ?

Thanks
Gurvinder


--
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2354793.html?by-user=tby-user=tby-user=t
 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2354793.html
 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2354793.html?by-user=tby-user=t
 
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list

[hidden email] 
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2356705i=1by-user=t 

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




___ 
rules-users mailing list 
[hidden email] 
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2356705i=2by-user=t  

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users





If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the 
discussion below:

http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2356705.html?by-user=tby-user=t
 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-rule-that-fires-when-it-matches-against-specific-facts-in-working-memory-tp2294599p2356705.html
 

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor UI bugs?

2011-01-26 Thread Toni Rikkola
You can browse our Jira for workarounds.
Please make a ticket for bugs you find if one doesn't already exist.

https://jira.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR

Toni Rikkola

On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:11 PM, jlegelis wrote:

 
 I'm running Drools 5.1.1 on JDK 1.6, client is Chrome on XP.   I've noticed
 quite a few UI bugs in Guvnor, most feel like browser caching issues,
 setter/getter issues etc.  For example, when creating test scenarios,
 changing the values in the 'given' clause then running the scenario results
 in the 'old' values being sent.  Anybody else notice this or have any
 workarounds?
 -- 
 View this message in context: 
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-UI-bugs-tp2356106p2356106.html
 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Clearing an AgendaGroup

2011-01-26 Thread Wolfgang Laun
After reading this description, I don't see any reason for using auto-focus
in the rule you have presented in the original email; especially the
combination with setFocus() in the RHS looks rather kinky to me.

Do you really mean that the final state after group2 is expected to be
*in*consistent
w.r.t. the checks in group1?

Anyway, I would use a rule in MAIN to give the focus to group1 and then to
group2 and avoid auto-focus and any control logic in the rules of either
group.

-W


On 26 January 2011 20:47, Evert Penninckx evert.pennin...@gmail.com wrote:



 manstis wrote:
 
  Were the rules in Agenda Group group1 executed, or merely evaluated?
 
  Agenda Group controls which activations on the agenda are executed, rules
  in
  all Agenda Groups will continue to be evaluated.
 

 I figured as much. But they're still being fired.

 I haven't had the chance to test this on a simple case. My ruleset has for
 now about 5 to 10 rules in group1 and about 15 in group2. Group1 evaluates
 the initial state of the working memory and signals possible
 inconsistencies
 (inserted as message facts in drool). The second group modifies facts in
 the
 working memory. The final state is expected to be inconsistent in regard to
 the consistency checks on the initial state. Yet, I see warnings being
 entered in drools after group2 modified facts

 I could consider a rule flow, but the checks are only there to debug
 abnormal behaviour and not related to a business process or something.  I'd
 really want to keep it hidden from the java-code calling the drools rules.



 Grtz

 E.
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Clearing-an-AgendaGroup-tp2353014p2356753.html
 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] proper syntax for multiple function calls within LHS

2011-01-26 Thread Wolfgang Laun
These questions are answered in the Drools Expert documentation. Look for
subsection headers Bound Variable Restriction and Return Value
Restriction.

-W


On 27 January 2011 02:13, garySFCA844 gs999...@yahoo.com wrote:


 hello,

 I'm a newbie to Drools.  I'm trying to write a rule that performs some
 math,
 without resorting to a function or eval. I searched the forum but found
 lots
 of posts on nested function calls,etc but not what I was searching for.

 For simplicity, lets assume I have the following classes

 public class ONE{
 double A
 double B
 double C
 }

 public class TWO{
 double D
 double E
 }

 where A, B, C, D, E are themselves calculated values (apr, price at some
 date, etc)

 1. What does the LHS of a rule that compares A  D look like?

 2. What does the LHS of a rule that compares A+B  C look like?

 3. What does the LHS of a rule that compares A+D  C look like?


 I apologize in advance if this was covered already.

 Thanks.
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/proper-syntax-for-multiple-function-calls-within-LHS-tp2359020p2359020.html
 Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


[rules-users] Looking for smart way to import huge amount of rules into BRMS

2011-01-26 Thread Benson Fung
Hi,

I need to import a drl file with 9000 rules inside into BRMS.  However, I
found that it takes very long time to import and it also takes long time to
get downloaded into the application to build the ruleBase.  Is there any
smart way or faster way to manage this procedure?  Please advise


Thanks
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] how to import rules from a drl to another drl file

2011-01-26 Thread Ayush

Is not there any way using which we can keep rules in say different files and
just import them in a single file. This will make the rule management an
easy process. Please help me doing this? I don't want to keep all my rules
in a single/long file. 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/how-to-import-rules-from-a-drl-to-another-drl-file-tp56211p2360526.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users