Re: [rules-users] firing rules twice in single session on single object
good morning sir, first of all i am very thankful to your support, but it is not working properly, first of all i want to explain my requirements please pay little time for me I have 1000 records of some data like sales amount I have two rules like below rule Mr First Rule salience 100 when #conditions sales : Sales (salesAmount =200) then #actions sales.set SalesMessage(goodsales); end rule My second Rule salience 80 when #conditions sales : Sales (salesAmount200) then #actions sales.set SalesMessage(badsales); end Here i want to insert facts from the list if the salesAmount list is modified in the same session( fact object is modified) how can i fire the rules again in the same session please help me in this scenario and if possible please provide some docs also regards sai On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:30 PM, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote: If you want the same rule to fire again and again then just modify the fact such that the WHEN condition is satisfied. For example in the HELLO WORLD sample Code : rule Hello World no-loop when m : Message( status == Message.HELLO, myMessage : message ) then System.out.println( myMessage ); m.setMessage( Goodbye cruel world ); m.setStatus( Message.GOODBYE ); update( m ); end You can alter and change the m.setStatus( Message.HELLO) and you can see the rule gets refired again. But this will make the rule to refire itself again and again, making it fall inside an infinite loop, which is logically not acceptable(For this reason no-loop exists). So my opinion would be modify your rule set to make few rules, such that each of them satisfies under some condition and gets fired !! Regards, Abhinay -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-firing-rules-twice-in-single-session-on-single-object-tp4020220p4020224.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- *Regards* *SAI BABA NADH* +91 7411680125 * * ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Custom Form with DSL
This sounds as though it's a bug.
Can you please create a JIRA (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR) and
attach a repository export demonstrating the issue.
Thanks,
Mike
On 11 October 2012 06:06, bhochhi bhoc...@aol.com wrote:
I were able to launch the custom form in DSL, however the rule condition is
not mapped to corresponding DRL. I don't know if this is a bug or just
something is missing. my DSL mapping looks like this:
[when]
my dsl is {varName:CF:MyFactType.fieldName} =
System.out.println({varName})
I have working set created then configured custom form for fieldName. All
things working but rule is not validating. When I check drl source, I found
the mapping is not taking place, its still displaying DSL expression in DRL
source instead of displaying:
System.out.println(values from cf)
Any ideas? I have tried this in guvnor 5.4.0.final and 5.5.beta1
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Custom-Form-with-DSL-tp4020207.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] firing rules twice in single session on single object
Hey sai, First of all make sure whether you will be having a list of objects containing salesAmount or list of salesAmount. If you are having a list, then your list should also be present in the WHEN condition, such that when the state of your list changes then the rule gets fired !! Regards, Abhinay -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-firing-rules-twice-in-single-session-on-single-object-tp4020220p4020241.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] firing rules twice in single session on single object
let me clear this by following code
public static void main(String[] args){
KnowledgeBase knowledgeBase = createKnowledgeBase();
ArrayListSalesAmount testSalesAmounts= getSalesAmount();
StatefulKnowledgeSession session =
knowledgeBase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession();
for(SalesAmount eachSalesAmount: testSalesAmounts){
session.insert(eachSalesAmount);
session.fireAllRules();
}
}
public static ArrayListSalesAmount getTestSalesAmounts(){
ArrayListSalesAmount testSalesAmount = new ArrayListSalesAmount();
for(int i =0; i15;i++){
Random random = new Random();
SalesAmount.testSalesAmount= new SalesAmount();
testSalesAmount.setId(i);
testSalesAmount.setSalesAmount(random.nextInt(500));
testSalesAmounts.add(testSalesAmount);
}
return testSalesAmounts;
}
SalesAmounts is assigned randomly using util class
and each fact is inserted at a time in the loop control
if after the loop , the data changes how can i fire the rules
please modify my code if any mistakes you find
regards
sai
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:05 PM, abhinay_agarwal
abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
Hey sai,
First of all make sure whether you will be having a list of objects
containing salesAmount or list of salesAmount.
If you are having a list, then your list should also be present in the WHEN
condition, such that when the state of your list changes then the rule gets
fired !!
Regards,
Abhinay
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-firing-rules-twice-in-single-session-on-single-object-tp4020220p4020241.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Hi,
a nice problem... see below
On 12/10/2012, mohan mohan.narang...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi laune,
I'll explain the process briefly. I’m getting voice call events from our
billing system. We want give some offers if call made inside specific cell
(uploaded this fact to WM in advance) . But we have to give offer only once
per day. So repeated calls inside this cell won’t eligible for offer again.
To achieve this we initiate a new event(NotificationEvent) and insert into
WM and set metadata @expires(24h) against each mobile no. Ultimately over
1000K NotificationEvents are residing in WM per day and guess it will
trigger OutOfMemory exception. How to handle such a case? Do we need to use
caching mechanism?
Unclear: Is NotificationEvent in the preceding paragraph the
OfferedEvent in your rule below? And the expiry would have to be set
for OfferedEvent, not each mobile no (as written above).
Also, clarify once per day. It seems that you want not again in the
next 24 hours but it can also be interpreted as only once between
0:00 and 24:00. (The latter would be much easier to handle.)
Beware: nothing of the code below is tested.
Reducing the number of facts can be done by registering offers made in a
one fact per offerId (assuming a mobile number can be stored in a long,
which should be possible):
declare OffersMade
offerId : int
origin2time : MapLong,Long
end
You match a call event to an offer:
rule Call matches Offer
when
$vc : VoiceCallEvent( $ct : eventTime,
$cell : cellID,
$mobile : originNumber)
$offer : CymOfferInfo($valTo : validTo.time = $ct,
cellId == $cell,
$offerId : offerType.getId,
$msgContent : cepMsgTemplates.getId)
then
end
Then there's two cases: you don't have a matching OffersMade yet, or
you have but the caller isn't registered:
rule No such offer yet
extends Call matches Offer
when
not OffersMade( offerId == $offerId )
then
OffersMade offersMade = new OffersMade();
offersMade.setOfferId( $offerId );
Map o2t = new HashMap();
offersMade.setOrigin2Time( o2t );
o2t.put( $mobile, $ct.getTime() );
insert( offersMade );
MdbServiceUtil.sendSMS( $mobile, $msgContent );
retract( $vc );
end
rule No offer for this origin
extends Call matches Offer
when
$om: OffersMade( offerId == $offerId,
origin2time.keySet not contains $mobile )
then
$om.getOrigin2Time().put( $mobile, $ct.getTime() );
update( $om );
MdbServiceUtil.sendSMS( $mobile, $msgContent );
retract( $vc );
end
Finally you need to get rid of old entries. This can be done in a rule
with a timer:
rule erase old offers
timer (cron:* 0/15 * * * ?)
when
$om: OffersMade()
then
boolean change = false;
long limit = (new Date()).getTime() - 24*60*60*1000;
for( Map.Entry entry: $om.getOrigin2Time().entrySet() ){
if( (Long)entry.getValue() = limit ){
$om.getOrigin2Time().remove( entry.getKey() );
change = true;
}
}
if( change ) update( $om );
end
This still requires two Long objects per offer made (and overhead for the Map).
You might reduce this further by storing the time only once per
OffersMade, so that it is sufficient to have a Set for the
originNumbers:
declare OffersMade
offerId : int
offerTime : long
origins : SetLong
end
Of course it would be obtuse to have one OffersMade per millisecond,
which means that offerTime must be reduced to ticks of some reasonable
granularity, I'd say between 1m and 1h. The required rule set is
similar to the preceding one, even simpler, as it is, for instance,
possible to discard an OffersMade object entirely after 24 hours:
rule discard old set
timer( int: 24h )
when
$om: OffersMade
then
retract( $om );
end
-W
Thanks.
see below code snippet
rule Voice CYM offer selector
dialect java
no-loop true
when
$vc : VoiceCallEvent( $ct : eventTime, $cell : cellID, $mobile :
originNumber) from entry-point IN-VOICE-CALL-EVENT
$offer : CymOfferInfo($valTo : validTo.time = $ct, cellId ==
$cell,$offerId : offerType.getId, $msgContent : cepMsgTemplates.getId)
not( OfferedEvent(mobileNo == $mobile , offerId == $offerId ))
then
CYMOfferMessage genMsg = new CYMOfferMessage();
OfferedEvent offered = new OfferedEvent();
offered.setMobileNo($mobile);
offered.setOfferId((String)$offerId);
genMsg.setMobile($mobile);
genMsg.setMsgContent($msgContent);
/* atttach offer here */
/* drop SMS message to queue block offer trigger again*/
mdbService.dropMessage(genMsg);
insert(offered);
end
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/java-lang-OutOfMemoryError-Java-heap-space-tp4020185p4020235.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [rules-users] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Hi laune, really appreciate your valuable time dedication on this. Yes I did a mistake that there is no NotificationEvent and that should be OfferedEvent. Primary keys of the OfferedEvent are mobileNo offerId. i.e should not send particular offer notification to perticuler mobile within next 24 hour. once per day : not again in the next 24 hours” . (not calender days) I’m checking your code and will try to apply. If there are any suggestion or any amendments based on above input please post. Thanks a lot -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/java-lang-OutOfMemoryError-Java-heap-space-tp4020185p4020246.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools Planner for purchasing optimization - good fit for problem?
Op 11-10-12 21:34, Schneider, Bill schreef: Geoffrey, Thanks for the quick response. As Im learning more about my scenario, it feels more like a mixed-integer problem than a combinatorial problem. The objective function is linear in the decision variables. I would model the decision variables as the quantities of each item from each vendor. This might be the biggest hurdle in Planner. A variable that represents a quantity, for which is it's unrealistic to make a pool of all values is currently difficult (but not impossible) in Planner. Future work will improve support for this - but currently you 'll likely need to implement custom moves (see manual). The conditional offers I could model as a separate vendor/bid, with a binary decision variable for condition met? and inequalities to constrain the quantities that depend on the binary variable. Some of the global constraints can be modeled in the same way, like at most two vendors. It sounds like there are some advantages to using Drools Planner in terms of readability and maintainability of the relationships and constraints you have the full expressive power of DRL (or Java), and are not limited to inequalities. That could make it easier to program for new types of rules or constraints later. Are there any advantages to using Drools Planner from a computational-complexity standpoint as well? Would it *hurt* to use in terms of CPU/memory, or even learning curve, for a problem that is possibly not combinatorial, and might be solvable with other means? In my experience, if it scales beyond 10 000 values (= bids) and 10 000 purchases, LP and MIP's memory requirements are impossible today and metaheuristics are the only way. See Google roadef 2012 competition: http://blog.athico.com/2012/06/roadef-2012-first-results-for-dataset-b.html And that's even without scaling out the number of constraints (= score rules). Also are you aware of any case studies or examples of Drools Planner being used in the purchasing domain like this? Not in the purchasing domain - I suspect the quantity complexity is hindering adoption in that area currently. Thanks again! --Bill From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Geoffrey De Smet Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:35 AM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Planner for purchasing optimization - good fit for problem? [] - If you want to upscale, go Metaheuristics (for example with Planner). If you want to downscale, linear programming might be a better fit. (Compo's like ROADEF 2012 assert this statement). - LP will require you to write your constraints as mathematical equitations based on arrays and primitives, for example "x y * 1.21". Planner uses a declarative OO approach using drools rules (or even just plain Java), for example "Invoice ($x yWithVAT)". - If you have different conditional price types, you might want to look into using a drools decision table to easily declare that conditional logic - and use that as in Planner. Especially if those rules change often. Thanks for any help you can give. --Bill ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] firing rules twice in single session on single object
A rule like
when
sales : Sales (salesAmount =200)
then
sales.setSalesMessage(goodsales);
end
will not trigger any new evaluation because the engine can't detect the
change. You'll need to make the engine aware of the change :
when
sales : Sales (salesAmount =200)
then
modify (sales) { setSalesMessage(goodsales); }
end
Notice that modify does NOT simply cause rules to re-fire. It causes a
reevaluation of the object which has been modified. Any rule with a pattern
that matches the new version of the object will become active gain. In your
case, since you do not have any constraints on the salesMessage, any
precondition that was holding before the set will be still holding and your
rule will LOOP. You will have to add a salesMessage == null condition in
the LHS, or mark the Sales class as @propertyReactive.
I would also like to understand your requirement of firing rules TWICE..
do you need to evaluate your fact both before and after setting the message?
(the salesamount would be unchanged)
Davide
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-firing-rules-twice-in-single-session-on-single-object-tp4020220p4020249.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools Planner for purchasing optimization - good fit for problem?
Geoffrey, Thanks, this was very helpful. --Bill From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Geoffrey De Smet Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 11:11 AM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Planner for purchasing optimization - good fit for problem? Op 11-10-12 21:34, Schneider, Bill schreef: Geoffrey, Thanks for the quick response. As I'm learning more about my scenario, it feels more like a mixed-integer problem than a combinatorial problem. The objective function is linear in the decision variables. I would model the decision variables as the quantities of each item from each vendor. This might be the biggest hurdle in Planner. A variable that represents a quantity, for which is it's unrealistic to make a pool of all values is currently difficult (but not impossible) in Planner. Future work will improve support for this - but currently you 'll likely need to implement custom moves (see manual). The conditional offers I could model as a separate vendor/bid, with a binary decision variable for condition met? and inequalities to constrain the quantities that depend on the binary variable. Some of the global constraints can be modeled in the same way, like at most two vendors. It sounds like there are some advantages to using Drools Planner in terms of readability and maintainability of the relationships and constraints - you have the full expressive power of DRL (or Java), and are not limited to inequalities. That could make it easier to program for new types of rules or constraints later. Are there any advantages to using Drools Planner from a computational-complexity standpoint as well? Would it *hurt* to use in terms of CPU/memory, or even learning curve, for a problem that is possibly not combinatorial, and might be solvable with other means? In my experience, if it scales beyond 10 000 values (= bids) and 10 000 purchases, LP and MIP's memory requirements are impossible today and metaheuristics are the only way. See Google roadef 2012 competition: http://blog.athico.com/2012/06/roadef-2012-first-results-for-dataset-b.html And that's even without scaling out the number of constraints (= score rules). Also - are you aware of any case studies or examples of Drools Planner being used in the purchasing domain like this? Not in the purchasing domain - I suspect the quantity complexity is hindering adoption in that area currently. Thanks again! --Bill ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Custom Form with DSL
Thanks Mike! I created the JIRA. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1956. Regards Rupesh -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Custom-Form-with-DSL-tp4020207p4020250.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Custom Form with DSL
Is there a way to pass the editing context to the custom form? For
example, in the rule below:
[when] type of mineral is {mineralName:CF:Mineral.name}and country of
mining is {countryName:CF:Country.name}
If the mineral Quartz is selected, then the custom form displaying the
country list should only display Quartz-producting countries. For this,
the fact that mineral type Quartz was selected would need to be passed to
the custom form. Is that possible?
Thanks
Ghanshyam
From: Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org,
Date: 10/12/2012 12:57 AM
Subject:Re: [rules-users] Custom Form with DSL
Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
This sounds as though it's a bug.
Can you please create a JIRA (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR) and
attach a repository export demonstrating the issue.
Thanks,
Mike
On 11 October 2012 06:06, bhochhi bhoc...@aol.com wrote:
I were able to launch the custom form in DSL, however the rule condition
is
not mapped to corresponding DRL. I don't know if this is a bug or just
something is missing. my DSL mapping looks like this:
[when]
my dsl is {varName:CF:MyFactType.fieldName} =
System.out.println({varName})
I have working set created then configured custom form for fieldName. All
things working but rule is not validating. When I check drl source, I
found
the mapping is not taking place, its still displaying DSL expression in
DRL
source instead of displaying:
System.out.println(values from cf)
Any ideas? I have tried this in guvnor 5.4.0.final and 5.5.beta1
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Custom-Form-with-DSL-tp4020207.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
-
The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the
personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying,
or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original
message. Thank you ___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Iterating facts
FactType (and FactField etc..) are an internal representation of a declared type's CLASS, hence you can get names, types, etc.. but obviously NOT any instance's values from there. You'll need something like this: FactType factType = ksession.getKnowledgeBase().getFactType(pckg, Project) ListFactField fFields = factType.getFields(); // get all Project INSTANCES currently in the WM Collection objs = kSession.getObjects( new ClassObjectFilter( factType.getFactClass() ); for ( Object o : objs ) for ( FactField field : fFields ) Object fieldValue = factType.get( o, field.getName() ); FactType exposes generic get and set methods which use a reflection-like mechanism to operate on instances extracted from the WM. Notice that since declared types are transformed into classes at RUNTIME, there is no way to do it at compile time without this meta approach. Best Davide -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Iterating-facts-tp4020214p4020254.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] [Drools Fusion] Accessing Events' time (read-only) with Drools in STREAM mode, REALTIME clock
Stefano Bragaglia wrote Hi guys, I just realised that it is not possible to take advantage of the default time handling and access the timestamp value at the same time. Agreed, one may want to write both qualitative ( A after B ) and quantitative constraints ( A.time x ) on an event. While this is possible when the even timestamp is assigned externally, this is very hard to do with the fusion-managed timestamp. Unfortunately, what you propose won't work, since that particular configuration (setting a @timestamp field) would break the assumption of immutable events. We would need something like: //operator-like, even better with implicit unification Event( this happensAt $t ) // timestamp Event( this lasts $d ) // duration //accessor-like Event( $t := happensAt, lasts 100 ) Probably this needs to be taken to the dev channel or to the jira feature requests Best Davide -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Fusion-Accessing-Events-time-read-only-with-Drools-in-STREAM-mode-REALTIME-clock-tp4020251p4020256.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server
Hi, I'm migrating rules from a Guvnor 5.2.x site to the new beta, I did this by exporting the old repo and importing in the new one. I can see the packages and rules OK now in the new 5.5 Beta 1, creating snapshots works OK. But build does not, I get an: 500 The call failed on the server; see server log for details http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4020260/Screen_Shot_2012-10-12_at_4.06.40_PM.png This is every time I try to build, either with the Build whole package option of the built in selector option. Is this happening to someone else? Is this way of migrating rules the recommended procedure? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-5-Beta1-Guvnor-Issue-500-The-call-failed-on-the-server-tp4020260.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server
You are following the recommended migration approach. Does the server log show anything more interesting than that in the pop-up? On 12 October 2012 20:14, alopez alo...@termmed.com wrote: Hi, I'm migrating rules from a Guvnor 5.2.x site to the new beta, I did this by exporting the old repo and importing in the new one. I can see the packages and rules OK now in the new 5.5 Beta 1, creating snapshots works OK. But build does not, I get an: 500 The call failed on the server; see server log for details http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4020260/Screen_Shot_2012-10-12_at_4.06.40_PM.png This is every time I try to build, either with the Build whole package option of the built in selector option. Is this happening to someone else? Is this way of migrating rules the recommended procedure? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-5-Beta1-Guvnor-Issue-500-The-call-failed-on-the-server-tp4020260.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server
Thanks, and I forgot to explain that, the console in the server is completely silent, if I create a snapshot I can see some Info messages displaying, but when building and the error appears the console has no messages. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-5-Beta1-Guvnor-Issue-500-The-call-failed-on-the-server-tp4020260p4020262.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server
What about the log file created by your Application Server? e.g. Tomcat places them in /apache-tomcat-6.0.30/logs; JBoss AS7.1 in /jboss-as-7.1.1.Final/standalone/log You may need to refer to your Application Server's documentation. On 12 October 2012 20:39, alopez alo...@termmed.com wrote: Thanks, and I forgot to explain that, the console in the server is completely silent, if I create a snapshot I can see some Info messages displaying, but when building and the error appears the console has no messages. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-5-Beta1-Guvnor-Issue-500-The-call-failed-on-the-server-tp4020260p4020262.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server
Yes, that is the one we are monitoring (tomcat in this case), we see this: INFO 12-10 11:58:59,435 (LoggingHelper.java:info:49) USER:admin CREATING MODULE SNAPSHOT for module: [ihtsdoBaseRules] snapshot name: [ihtsdoBaseRules but it does not show anything new if we try to build... -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-5-Beta1-Guvnor-Issue-500-The-call-failed-on-the-server-tp4020260p4020264.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server
OK, strange, but I have no reason to doubt you. We will need your repository export file to investigate further, or at least a minimal 5.2 export that demonstrates the problem. Please raise a JIRA (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR) and attach the same. With kind regards, Mike On 12 October 2012 21:04, alopez alo...@termmed.com wrote: Yes, that is the one we are monitoring (tomcat in this case), we see this: INFO 12-10 11:58:59,435 (LoggingHelper.java:info:49) USER:admin CREATING MODULE SNAPSHOT for module: [ihtsdoBaseRules] snapshot name: [ihtsdoBaseRules but it does not show anything new if we try to build... -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-5-Beta1-Guvnor-Issue-500-The-call-failed-on-the-server-tp4020260p4020264.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server
Thanks, will do that. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-5-Beta1-Guvnor-Issue-500-The-call-failed-on-the-server-tp4020260p4020266.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Has this issue been fixed, or is it still necessary to remove any event listeners so that the session is freed? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/java-lang-OutOfMemoryError-Java-heap-space-tp54778p4020267.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
