[rules-users] Contains an object
Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string=TST,int=1)) I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL and it would be great if I could accomplish something like this above TIA! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941334.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Contains an object
I guess I could also have a method on my main object that takes parameters and just do a not null check... gboro54 wrote Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string=TST,int=1)) I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL and it would be great if I could accomplish something like this above TIA! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941343.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Contains an object
Yes I know that from can be used with DSL. I was just trying to think of a way to do something with a sub part of the object(i.e a dsl entry with a - ) laune wrote On 26/04/2012, gboro54 lt;gboro54@gt; wrote: Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e Yes, but've got to follow Java's sytax rules (apart from using additional operators). obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string=TST,int=1)) The second operand isn't a valid Java expression. Rather than being forced to use from, consider inserting SubObjects as facts. $subobj: SubObject(string=TST,int=1) obj:Object(collection contains $subobj) I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL and it would be great if I could accomplish something like this above But using from can be accomplished with a DSL phrase as well. -W TIA! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941334.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@.jboss https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@.jboss https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941387.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Contains an object
On 26/04/2012, gboro54 gbor...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e Yes, but've got to follow Java's sytax rules (apart from using additional operators). obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string=TST,int=1)) The second operand isn't a valid Java expression. Rather than being forced to use from, consider inserting SubObjects as facts. $subobj: SubObject(string=TST,int=1) obj:Object(collection contains $subobj) I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL and it would be great if I could accomplish something like this above But using from can be accomplished with a DSL phrase as well. -W TIA! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941334.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
