Re: [rules-users] Help please!!!
Hi Toni, It's very interesting to know it. It is possible that it is a bug. I did the test several times but the results are the same. Best regard -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Help-please-tp4018136p4018245.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Help please!!!
Must be a bug, perhaps verifier thinks these two rules are in different packages. I can take a look at this next week. Toni On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:59 PM, paco wrote: > I want to detect the conflict between the rules with Drools Verifier. For > example the first condition of the second rule is present in the first rule > and the actions to perform are the same in both rules as they demonstrate in > the following case. It works very well when these rules belong to the same > drl file. > - fichier a.drl--- > rule "a" >no-loop true >ruleflow-group "group1" >dialect "mvel" >when >A==0 >then >Action1 > end > rule "b" >no-loop true >ruleflow-group "group1" >dialect "mvel" >when >A==0 && B==1 >then >Action1 > end > > The problem arises when I separated its rules and that I have to put each in > its own file > a.drl > rule "a" >no-loop true >ruleflow-group "group1" >dialect "mvel" >when >A==0 >then >Action1 > end > > --b.drl > rule "b" >no-loop true >ruleflow-group "group1" >dialect "mvel" >when >A==0 && B==1 >then >Action1 > end > I can no longer detect this problem with Drools Verifier. > Does anyone ever encountered this problem? > How can I do to write a small program to audit if this case? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Help-please-tp4018136.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ___ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Help please!!!
I want to detect the conflict between the rules with Drools Verifier. For example the first condition of the second rule is present in the first rule and the actions to perform are the same in both rules as they demonstrate in the following case. It works very well when these rules belong to the same drl file. - fichier a.drl--- rule "a" no-loop true ruleflow-group "group1" dialect "mvel" when A==0 then Action1 end rule "b" no-loop true ruleflow-group "group1" dialect "mvel" when A==0 && B==1 then Action1 end The problem arises when I separated its rules and that I have to put each in its own file a.drl rule "a" no-loop true ruleflow-group "group1" dialect "mvel" when A==0 then Action1 end --b.drl rule "b" no-loop true ruleflow-group "group1" dialect "mvel" when A==0 && B==1 then Action1 end I can no longer detect this problem with Drools Verifier. Does anyone ever encountered this problem? How can I do to write a small program to audit if this case? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Help-please-tp4018136.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users