Re: [rules-users] Possible shadow proxy issue with JDK Dynamic proxies in 4.0.1?
I'll be glad to test with the trunk. Do you have a snapshot build or do I have to build my own? It would be nice for your downloads area to contain a nightly snapshot build. -Chris On 9/17/07, Mark Proctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe some fixes broke this? can you test with trunk, and submit a jira with a self contained test if you still have a problem Mark Chris West wrote: Hello, After stumbling upon an issue with version 4.0.0 using memberOf, I decided to upgrade to version 4.0.1. After upgrading, my rules do not seem to fire correctly. In the past, I had discovered issues (prior to 4.0.0 release) relating to my use of JDK dynamic proxies as facts. The drools team developed a fix for my problem, and it involved searching for a base interface type to build the shadow proxy from when the class type is final (all JDK dynamic proxies are). This problem I'm seeing now seems very similar in behavior to what I saw before. Is there any change related to shadow proxies that went into 4.0.1? Thanks, -Chris West -- ___ rules-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Possible shadow proxy issue with JDK Dynamic proxies in 4.0.1?
Snapshot build: http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-rules Thanks. 2007/9/18, Chris West [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'll be glad to test with the trunk. Do you have a snapshot build or do I have to build my own? It would be nice for your downloads area to contain a nightly snapshot build. -Chris On 9/17/07, Mark Proctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe some fixes broke this? can you test with trunk, and submit a jira with a self contained test if you still have a problem Mark Chris West wrote: Hello, After stumbling upon an issue with version 4.0.0 using memberOf, I decided to upgrade to version 4.0.1. After upgrading, my rules do not seem to fire correctly. In the past, I had discovered issues (prior to 4.0.0 release) relating to my use of JDK dynamic proxies as facts. The drools team developed a fix for my problem, and it involved searching for a base interface type to build the shadow proxy from when the class type is final (all JDK dynamic proxies are). This problem I'm seeing now seems very similar in behavior to what I saw before. Is there any change related to shadow proxies that went into 4.0.1? Thanks, -Chris West -- ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office: +55 11 3529-6000 Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Possible shadow proxy issue with JDK Dynamic proxies in 4.0.1?
I tested the SNAPSHOT, and the problem exists. So my tests indicate that the example attached to the JIRA runs properly on 4.0.0, does not work on 4.0.1, and does not work on the trunk SNAPSHOT. -Chris On 9/18/07, Chris West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Edson, Thanks for the snapshot build location. I just created a JIRA against 4.0.1 illustrating the problem. I'll now test against the snapshot. http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1203 Thanks, -Chris West On 9/18/07, Edson Tirelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Snapshot build: http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-rules Thanks. 2007/9/18, Chris West [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'll be glad to test with the trunk. Do you have a snapshot build or do I have to build my own? It would be nice for your downloads area to contain a nightly snapshot build. -Chris On 9/17/07, Mark Proctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe some fixes broke this? can you test with trunk, and submit a jira with a self contained test if you still have a problem Mark Chris West wrote: Hello, After stumbling upon an issue with version 4.0.0 using memberOf, I decided to upgrade to version 4.0.1. After upgrading, my rules do not seem to fire correctly. In the past, I had discovered issues (prior to 4.0.0 release) relating to my use of JDK dynamic proxies as facts. The drools team developed a fix for my problem, and it involved searching for a base interface type to build the shadow proxy from when the class type is final (all JDK dynamic proxies are). This problem I'm seeing now seems very similar in behavior to what I saw before. Is there any change related to shadow proxies that went into 4.0.1? Thanks, -Chris West -- ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office: +55 11 3529-6000 Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Possible shadow proxy issue with JDK Dynamic proxies in 4.0.1?
Hello, After stumbling upon an issue with version 4.0.0 using memberOf, I decided to upgrade to version 4.0.1. After upgrading, my rules do not seem to fire correctly. In the past, I had discovered issues (prior to 4.0.0 release) relating to my use of JDK dynamic proxies as facts. The drools team developed a fix for my problem, and it involved searching for a base interface type to build the shadow proxy from when the class type is final (all JDK dynamic proxies are). This problem I'm seeing now seems very similar in behavior to what I saw before. Is there any change related to shadow proxies that went into 4.0.1? Thanks, -Chris West ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Possible shadow proxy issue with JDK Dynamic proxies in 4.0.1?
Maybe some fixes broke this? can you test with trunk, and submit a jira with a self contained test if you still have a problem Mark Chris West wrote: Hello, After stumbling upon an issue with version 4.0.0 using memberOf, I decided to upgrade to version 4.0.1. After upgrading, my rules do not seem to fire correctly. In the past, I had discovered issues (prior to 4.0.0 release) relating to my use of JDK dynamic proxies as facts. The drools team developed a fix for my problem, and it involved searching for a base interface type to build the shadow proxy from when the class type is final (all JDK dynamic proxies are). This problem I'm seeing now seems very similar in behavior to what I saw before. Is there any change related to shadow proxies that went into 4.0.1? Thanks, -Chris West ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
