Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
Thanks for the warning, some old bugs appears clearer now !!!
Is it planned in a near future to only exclude the constraint and not
the whole fact pattern ?
To me, it seems more accurate to do this way.
Le 19/03/2012 22:57, Michael Anstis a écrit :
This is true, but be aware that if a cell value in the Template data
is empty the whole Fact Pattern is omitted.
For example:-
rule Discount @{row.rowNumber}
when
Account( $v : @{field} != null )
$c : Customer( @{field} == $v , accno == @{accno} )
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
If field is empty neither Account or Customer will be included
in the generated DRL.
If accno is empty Customer will not be included in the generated DRL.
This may have an impact on what you want to achieve.
With kind regards,
Mike
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
To be honest there are no plans.
Templates are implemented internally as MVEL templates and hence String
manipulation.
At this level concepts of Pattern and Constraint have no meaning and
hence it is next to impossible to determine what impact a missing parameter
value has.
On 22 March 2012 09:40, Vincent Legendre
vincent.legen...@eurodecision.comwrote:
Thanks for the warning, some old bugs appears clearer now !!!
Is it planned in a near future to only exclude the constraint and not the
whole fact pattern ?
To me, it seems more accurate to do this way.
Le 19/03/2012 22:57, Michael Anstis a écrit :
This is true, but be aware that if a cell value in the Template data is
empty the whole Fact Pattern is omitted.
For example:-
rule Discount @{row.rowNumber}
when
Account( $v : @{field} != null )
$c : Customer( @{field} == $v , accno == @{accno} )
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
If field is empty neither Account or Customer will be included in
the generated DRL.
If accno is empty Customer will not be included in the generated DRL.
This may have an impact on what you want to achieve.
With kind regards,
Mike
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
Hi
Instead of using a workaround, did you have a look to rule templates ?
- under guvnor :
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Beta2/drools-guvnor-docs/html_single/index.html#d0e1143
- drl :
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Beta2/drools-expert-docs/html_single/index.html#d0e7501
You should be able to do exactly what you are trying to do, but properly, like
that :
template header
field
accno
package range;
template Discount
rule Discount @{row.rowNumber}
when
Account( $v : @{field} != null )
$c : Customer( @{field} == $v , accno == @{accno} )
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
end template
- Mail original -
De: Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com
À: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 15 Mars 2012 14:20:01
Objet: Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
I inserted Account column with values that are always true.
Works fine. :)
Will try the same with 5.3 .
Thanks Regards,
Sumeet
From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Date: 03/15/2012 05:30 PM
Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision
table
Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
The documentation for 5.3.0 says
quote
To include a pattern without constraints, you can write the pattern in
front of the text for another pattern.
/quote
but it does not work with 5.2.0 and (likely) later versions.
As a workaround, re-insert the Account column and use a redundant
condition that is certainly true for all facts.
I'll have to look into this.
-W
On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang
any other way to achieve this. I have tried many times, but no success
till
now :(
Thanks,
Sumeet
From: Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Date: 03/15/2012 04:24 PM
Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column
decision
table
Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
After doing the changes, its taking the rules as:
rule Discount_10
when
$a:Account(type ==
$a.getType(), accno == 1001)
$c:Customer
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
and if I put it as $a: Account() $c: Customer(), it takes the rules as:
rule Discount_10
when
$a:Account(type ==
$a.getType(), accno == 1001)
$c:Customer()
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
Both these throw error..
neither putting the $c:Customer before $a:Account is getting executed.
Thanks Regards,
Sumeet
Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com
From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Date: 03/15/2012 04:06 PM
Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column
decision
table
Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote:
How to make changes to the decision table entries to get a drl of this
kind:
Put
$a: Account() $c: Customer
into the cell where you now have $c : Customer and delete the Account
column.
-W
rule Discount_10
when
$a : Account()
$c : Customer(type ==
$a.getType(), accno == 1001
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
This is true, but be aware that if a cell value in the Template data is
empty the whole Fact Pattern is omitted.
For example:-
rule Discount @{row.rowNumber}
when
Account( $v : @{field} != null )
$c : Customer( @{field} == $v , accno == @{accno} )
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
If field is empty neither Account or Customer will be included in the
generated DRL.
If accno is empty Customer will not be included in the generated DRL.
This may have an impact on what you want to achieve.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 19 March 2012 21:29, Vincent LEGENDRE
vincent.legen...@eurodecision.comwrote:
Hi
Instead of using a workaround, did you have a look to rule templates ?
- under guvnor :
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Beta2/drools-guvnor-docs/html_single/index.html#d0e1143
- drl :
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Beta2/drools-expert-docs/html_single/index.html#d0e7501
You should be able to do exactly what you are trying to do, but properly,
like that :
template header
field
accno
package range;
template Discount
rule Discount @{row.rowNumber}
when
Account( $v : @{field} != null )
$c : Customer( @{field} == $v , accno == @{accno} )
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
end template
- Mail original -
De: Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com
À: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 15 Mars 2012 14:20:01
Objet: Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
I inserted Account column with values that are always true.
Works fine. :)
Will try the same with 5.3 .
Thanks Regards,
Sumeet
From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Date: 03/15/2012 05:30 PM
Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision
table
Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
The documentation for 5.3.0 says
quote
To include a pattern without constraints, you can write the pattern in
front of the text for another pattern.
/quote
but it does not work with 5.2.0 and (likely) later versions.
As a workaround, re-insert the Account column and use a redundant
condition that is certainly true for all facts.
I'll have to look into this.
-W
On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang
any other way to achieve this. I have tried many times, but no success
till
now :(
Thanks,
Sumeet
From: Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Date: 03/15/2012 04:24 PM
Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column
decision
table
Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
After doing the changes, its taking the rules as:
rule Discount_10
when
$a:Account(type ==
$a.getType(), accno == 1001)
$c:Customer
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
and if I put it as $a: Account() $c: Customer(), it takes the rules as:
rule Discount_10
when
$a:Account(type ==
$a.getType(), accno == 1001)
$c:Customer()
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
Both these throw error..
neither putting the $c:Customer before $a:Account is getting executed.
Thanks Regards,
Sumeet
Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com
From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Date: 03/15/2012 04:06 PM
Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column
decision
table
Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote:
How to make changes to the decision table entries to get a drl of this
kind:
Put
$a: Account() $c: Customer
into the cell where you now have $c : Customer and delete the Account
column.
-W
rule Discount_10
when
$a : Account()
$c : Customer(type ==
$a.getType(), accno == 1001)
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
Thanks,
Sumeet
Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com
From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Date: 03/15/2012 02:47 PM
Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column
decision
table
Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
Line breaks were lost in transit, but I think that you should remove
the quotes from
type == $param
if you insert an expression $a.getType().
-W
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
Line breaks were lost in transit, but I think that you should remove the quotes from type == $param if you insert an expression $a.getType(). -W On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: Hi, Can we use a data value of another object in the condition column of a Spreadsheet. For example: I have two data types(POJOs) one com.bank.Customer and other com.bank.Account in the rules I want to check whether the value entered for a particular field in Customer class is equal to the value entered for the corresponding field in the Account class. eg Customer.accType = Account.accType() How can we achieve this using Decision table (CONDITION Column). I have tried this: |RuleTable |Discount |CONDITION |CONDITION | ---+| |$a : Account |$c : Customer | ---+| | |type == $param --+---+ | Discount |Account|Type| | Rules | || |--+---+| |1 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |2 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |3 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |4 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |5 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |6 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| But it won't work. It would be great if somebody could help me on this. Thanks Regards, Sumeet Karawal Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
when I do this I am getting the below error:
Exception in thread main java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to Analyse
Expression $a.getType():
[Error: unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
com.example.model.Customer.$a()]
[Near : {... $a.getType() }]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 1] : [Rule name='Discount_10']
Unable to Analyse Expression $a.getType():
[Error: unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
com.example.model.Customer.$a()]
[Near : {... $a.getType() }]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 1] : [Rule name='Discount_11']
Unable to Analyse Expression $a.getType():
[Error: unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
com.example.model.Customer.$a()]
[Near : {... $a.getType() }]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 1] : [Rule name='Discount_12']
|
|RuleTable
|Discount
|
|CONDITION |CONDITION |
|---+|
|$a : Account |$c : Customer |
|---+|
| |type == $param
|---+
|Account|Type|
|---+|
| |$a.getType()|
|---+|
| ||
|---+|
| ||
|---+|
| ||
|---+|
| ||
|---+|
| ||
|---+|
Howerver, when I include the following in the decision table:
|
|RuleTable
|Discount
|
|CONDITION |CONDITION |
|---+|
|$a : Account |$c : Customer |
|---+|
|type |type == $param
|---+
|Account|Type|
|---+|
|savings|$a.getType()|
|---+|
|current||
|---+|
|savings||
|---+|
|current||
|---+|
|savings||
|---+|
|current||
|---+|
I am getting correct result. But here I don't want to check for the type
entered for Account class.
The generated drl is like this:
rule Discount_10
when
$c : Customer(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001)
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
How to make changes to the decision table entries to get a drl of this
kind:
rule Discount_10
when
$a : Account()
$c : Customer(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001)
then
$c.setDiscount(1);
end
Thanks,
Sumeet
Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com
From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Date: 03/15/2012 02:47 PM
Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision
table
Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: How to make changes to the decision table entries to get a drl of this kind: Put $a: Account() $c: Customer into the cell where you now have $c : Customer and delete the Account column. -W rule Discount_10 when $a : Account() $c : Customer(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) then $c.setDiscount(1); end Thanks, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 02:47 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org Line breaks were lost in transit, but I think that you should remove the quotes from type == $param if you insert an expression $a.getType(). -W On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: Hi, Can we use a data value of another object in the condition column of a Spreadsheet. For example: I have two data types(POJOs) one com.bank.Customer and other com.bank.Account in the rules I want to check whether the value entered for a particular field in Customer class is equal to the value entered for the corresponding field in the Account class. eg Customer.accType = Account.accType() How can we achieve this using Decision table (CONDITION Column). I have tried this: |RuleTable |Discount |CONDITION |CONDITION | ---+| |$a : Account |$c : Customer | ---+| | |type == $param --+---+ | Discount |Account|Type| | Rules | || |--+---+| |1 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |2 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |3 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |4 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |5 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |6 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| But it won't work. It would be great if somebody could help me on this. Thanks Regards, Sumeet Karawal Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
After doing the changes, its taking the rules as: rule Discount_10 when $a:Account(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) $c:Customer then $c.setDiscount(1); end and if I put it as $a: Account() $c: Customer(), it takes the rules as: rule Discount_10 when $a:Account(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) $c:Customer() then $c.setDiscount(1); end Both these throw error.. neither putting the $c:Customer before $a:Account is getting executed. Thanks Regards, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 04:06 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: How to make changes to the decision table entries to get a drl of this kind: Put $a: Account() $c: Customer into the cell where you now have $c : Customer and delete the Account column. -W rule Discount_10 when $a : Account() $c : Customer(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) then $c.setDiscount(1); end Thanks, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 02:47 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org Line breaks were lost in transit, but I think that you should remove the quotes from type == $param if you insert an expression $a.getType(). -W On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: Hi, Can we use a data value of another object in the condition column of a Spreadsheet. For example: I have two data types(POJOs) one com.bank.Customer and other com.bank.Account in the rules I want to check whether the value entered for a particular field in Customer class is equal to the value entered for the corresponding field in the Account class. eg Customer.accType = Account.accType() How can we achieve this using Decision table (CONDITION Column). I have tried this: |RuleTable |Discount |CONDITION |CONDITION | ---+| |$a : Account |$c : Customer | ---+| | |type == $param --+---+ | Discount |Account|Type| | Rules | || |--+---+| |1 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |2 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |3 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |4 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |5 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |6 | |$a.getType
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
Hi Wolfgang any other way to achieve this. I have tried many times, but no success till now :( Thanks, Sumeet From: Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 04:24 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org After doing the changes, its taking the rules as: rule Discount_10 when $a:Account(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) $c:Customer then $c.setDiscount(1); end and if I put it as $a: Account() $c: Customer(), it takes the rules as: rule Discount_10 when $a:Account(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) $c:Customer() then $c.setDiscount(1); end Both these throw error.. neither putting the $c:Customer before $a:Account is getting executed. Thanks Regards, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 04:06 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: How to make changes to the decision table entries to get a drl of this kind: Put $a: Account() $c: Customer into the cell where you now have $c : Customer and delete the Account column. -W rule Discount_10 when $a : Account() $c : Customer(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) then $c.setDiscount(1); end Thanks, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 02:47 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org Line breaks were lost in transit, but I think that you should remove the quotes from type == $param if you insert an expression $a.getType(). -W On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: Hi, Can we use a data value of another object in the condition column of a Spreadsheet. For example: I have two data types(POJOs) one com.bank.Customer and other com.bank.Account in the rules I want to check whether the value entered for a particular field in Customer class is equal to the value entered for the corresponding field in the Account class. eg Customer.accType = Account.accType() How can we achieve this using Decision table (CONDITION Column). I have tried this: |RuleTable |Discount |CONDITION |CONDITION | ---+| |$a : Account |$c : Customer | ---+| | |type == $param --+---+ | Discount |Account|Type| | Rules | || |--+---+| |1
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
The documentation for 5.3.0 says quote To include a pattern without constraints, you can write the pattern in front of the text for another pattern. /quote but it does not work with 5.2.0 and (likely) later versions. As a workaround, re-insert the Account column and use a redundant condition that is certainly true for all facts. I'll have to look into this. -W On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: Hi Wolfgang any other way to achieve this. I have tried many times, but no success till now :( Thanks, Sumeet From: Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 04:24 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org After doing the changes, its taking the rules as: rule Discount_10 when $a:Account(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) $c:Customer then $c.setDiscount(1); end and if I put it as $a: Account() $c: Customer(), it takes the rules as: rule Discount_10 when $a:Account(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) $c:Customer() then $c.setDiscount(1); end Both these throw error.. neither putting the $c:Customer before $a:Account is getting executed. Thanks Regards, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 04:06 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: How to make changes to the decision table entries to get a drl of this kind: Put $a: Account() $c: Customer into the cell where you now have $c : Customer and delete the Account column. -W rule Discount_10 when $a : Account() $c : Customer(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) then $c.setDiscount(1); end Thanks, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 02:47 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org Line breaks were lost in transit, but I think that you should remove the quotes from type == $param if you insert an expression $a.getType(). -W On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: Hi, Can we use a data value of another object in the condition column of a Spreadsheet. For example: I have two data types(POJOs) one com.bank.Customer and other com.bank.Account in the rules I want to check whether the value entered for a particular field in Customer class is equal to the value entered for the corresponding field in the Account class. eg Customer.accType = Account.accType() How can we achieve this using Decision table (CONDITION Column). I have tried this: |RuleTable |Discount |CONDITION |CONDITION | ---+| |$a : Account |$c : Customer | ---+| | |type == $param --+---+ | Discount |Account|Type| | Rules | || |--+---+| |1 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |2 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |3 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |4 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |5 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| |6 | |$a.getType()| |--+---+| But it won't work. It would be great
Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table
I inserted Account column with values that are always true. Works fine. :) Will try the same with 5.3 . Thanks Regards, Sumeet From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 05:30 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org The documentation for 5.3.0 says quote To include a pattern without constraints, you can write the pattern in front of the text for another pattern. /quote but it does not work with 5.2.0 and (likely) later versions. As a workaround, re-insert the Account column and use a redundant condition that is certainly true for all facts. I'll have to look into this. -W On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: Hi Wolfgang any other way to achieve this. I have tried many times, but no success till now :( Thanks, Sumeet From: Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 04:24 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org After doing the changes, its taking the rules as: rule Discount_10 when $a:Account(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) $c:Customer then $c.setDiscount(1); end and if I put it as $a: Account() $c: Customer(), it takes the rules as: rule Discount_10 when $a:Account(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) $c:Customer() then $c.setDiscount(1); end Both these throw error.. neither putting the $c:Customer before $a:Account is getting executed. Thanks Regards, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 04:06 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: How to make changes to the decision table entries to get a drl of this kind: Put $a: Account() $c: Customer into the cell where you now have $c : Customer and delete the Account column. -W rule Discount_10 when $a : Account() $c : Customer(type == $a.getType(), accno == 1001) then $c.setDiscount(1); end Thanks, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: 03/15/2012 02:47 PM Subject:Re: [rules-users] Data comparing in CONDITION column decision table Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org Line breaks were lost in transit, but I think that you should remove the quotes from type == $param if you insert an expression $a.getType(). -W On 15/03/2012, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.com wrote: Hi, Can we use a data value of another object in the condition column of a Spreadsheet. For example: I have two data types(POJOs) one com.bank.Customer and other
