Re: Re[rules-users] sult Lists from Decision Tables

2009-05-28 Thread wasabifan

This is what I was looking for.  Thanks, I just wasn't making the connection
between Variables in Decision Tables and Globals in the generated DRL.

Bryan


wasabifan wrote:
> 
> Possibly.  Is that set by the Variables keyword in Decision Tables?  Then
> in the Java code you just set the global variable by
> session.setGlobal(string, object)?
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Result-Lists-from-Decision-Tables-tp23749077p23762282.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: Re[rules-users] sult Lists from Decision Tables

2009-05-27 Thread wasabifan

Possibly.  Is that set by the Variables keyword in Decision Tables?  Then in
the Java code you just set the global variable by session.setGlobal(string,
object)?


Michal Bali-2 wrote:
> 
> Hi Bryan,
> 
> Can you use globals for this ?
> 
> Regards,
> Michal
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Result-Lists-from-Decision-Tables-tp23749077p23752966.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: Re[rules-users] sult Lists from Decision Tables

2009-05-27 Thread Michal Bali
Hi Bryan,

Can you use globals for this ?

Regards,
Michal


On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM, wasabifan
wrote:

>
> I have worked directly with DRLs previously, but my new company would like
> to
> store their rules in decision tables.
>
> Basically, in the past, we would insert a custom object to maintain a list
> of results from the rules, which was pretty easy to do in a DRL.  However,
> in decision tables, I have not found a good way to create a named parameter
> for that controlled list without making up a bogus condition (that really
> doesn't matter).
>
> Is there an easy way to pass an object to really only be used in the
> actions
> columns?
>
> Thanks,
> Bryan
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Result-Lists-from-Decision-Tables-tp23749077p23749077.html
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re[rules-users] sult Lists from Decision Tables

2009-05-27 Thread wasabifan

I have worked directly with DRLs previously, but my new company would like to
store their rules in decision tables.

Basically, in the past, we would insert a custom object to maintain a list
of results from the rules, which was pretty easy to do in a DRL.  However,
in decision tables, I have not found a good way to create a named parameter
for that controlled list without making up a bogus condition (that really
doesn't matter).

Is there an easy way to pass an object to really only be used in the actions
columns?

Thanks,
Bryan
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Result-Lists-from-Decision-Tables-tp23749077p23749077.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users