Hi, Following up on my last post on this topic (since there seemed to be at least some interest): after evaluating the setup for a few weeks, I have decided that this is not as good a solution as I had hoped.
In particular, the expected benefits of splitting data between a special vdev backed by a bucket with small object size and a normal vdev backed by a bucket with much larger object size did not materialize. More details (including histograms) are available at https://www.rath.org/zfs-on-nbd-my-verdict.html Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s3ql" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to s3ql+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/s3ql/5275f1fe-8516-4f0d-8b47-62b9fec591ae%40app.fastmail.com.
