[sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with some files in the queue
11305 patch changed. Best, Travis On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:14:19 PM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote: In the combinat queue, some files contain non-ascii characters. Several participants at Sage-Combinat Days 40 have run into problems with this: when there are non-ascii characters, if you clone the combinat queue, you get errors when building Sage and its documentation. - trac_11305-rigged_configurations-ts.patch: line 1064 (in 187–201) contains a character which looks like a hyphen, but is not, so it needs to be replaced. - trac_11929_8899-ncsf-qsym-fs.patch: line 77 has a similar problem (218–348). - separatrix_diagram-vd.patch: line 2179 looks something like this: +`vef = 1` and the action of the group generated by `v,e,f` acts transitvely but there are two characters of gibberish before `v,e,f`. They should be deleted. - trac_12518-enumerated_set_from_iterator-vd.patch: line 476 has a character (immediately after the #) which looks like a space but isn't. Maybe Franco has fixed this already, but please check. -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/wmvPLCSllEYJ. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
[sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken
Hey, I'm also getting an error when applying trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch. Is this related? Best, Travis On Thursday, July 12, 2012 7:46:15 PM UTC+1, Anne Schilling wrote: Hi! The patch queue is currently broken with sage-5.1. Nicolas claims that he fixed this before lunch, so Chris, did you make changes since that break the queue? Thanks, Anne -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/9yN-IChX0mYJ. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Root systems do not define variables correctly
Hi, I guess injecting simple roots would be my choice. If not possible, at least, it would be cleaner to remove inject_variables from the auto completion list for A. S. * Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr [2012-07-12 23:47:34]: On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:08:54PM -0400, VulK wrote: I just noticed the following odd behaviour: sage: L=RootSystem(['A',2]).root_lattice() sage: L.inject_variables() --- ValueErrorTraceback (most recent call last) ValueError: variable names have not yet been set using I am running Sage Version 5.1, Release Date: 2012-07-09 with combinat queue both compiled from sources today (I noticed the same behaviour on an old 4.8 install and I upgraded to check if had already been addressed). I assume it will suffices to add _assign_names in the definition of root_lattice but I did not have time to check it. What would you want this method to do for root lattices? Nicolas -- Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken
Hi Travis, For me everything applies fine under sage-5.1. Which version of sage are you using? You should upgrade to sage-5.1 most likely! Anne On 7/13/12 4:23 AM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: Hey, I'm also getting an error when applying trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch. Is this related? Best, Travis On Thursday, July 12, 2012 7:46:15 PM UTC+1, Anne Schilling wrote: Hi! The patch queue is currently broken with sage-5.1. Nicolas claims that he fixed this before lunch, so Chris, did you make changes since that break the queue? Thanks, Anne -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
[sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken
The queue is applying to 5.0 fine for me. -Hugh On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:46:15 PM UTC+3, Anne Schilling wrote: Hi! The patch queue is currently broken with sage-5.1. Nicolas claims that he fixed this before lunch, so Chris, did you make changes since that break the queue? Thanks, Anne -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/ZBgzO-vXl4AJ. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Root systems do not define variables correctly
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:07:48AM -0400, VulK wrote: I guess injecting simple roots would be my choice. That could make sense since they are the generators. However I am not sure what name to give them (they are indexed by 1,2,3). In this case, I guess I'd rather implement inject_shorthands that would inject respectively s, alpha, alphacheck, ... for L.simple_reflections(), L.simple_roots(), L.simple_coroots(), ... If not possible, at least, it would be cleaner to remove inject_variables from the auto completion list for A. I agree: this method should ideally be lower in the class hierarchy (it's in CategoryObject right now). If you find a lower class that covers all current proper use cases, please create a ticket. I guess Parent would be a good start even though it would not change anything for root lattices. Otherwise, there could be a comment in the documentation of CategoryObject.inject_shorthands stating that this only works for parents whose generators have names that can be mapped to Python identifiers. Feel free to proceed on that, after checking whether there has been any discussion on sage-devel/trac recently about inject_variables. Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken
Hi, We are in the last few hours of sage days and I had to disable a few patches. I didn't figure what the cause was in these cases, only that they weren't working for me now. We made changes on symmetric functions so I am sure that Martin's patch is failing to apply at least partly because of that. sf_principal_specialization-mr.patch trac_6538-partitions_max_slope-ts.patch I don't know what is failing with Travis' patch. I'll try to restore them later. -Mike On Friday, 13 July 2012 09:14:47 UTC-5, Anne Schilling wrote: Hi Travis, For me everything applies fine under sage-5.1. Which version of sage are you using? You should upgrade to sage-5.1 most likely! Anne On 7/13/12 4:23 AM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: Hey, I'm also getting an error when applying trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch. Is this related? Best, Travis On Thursday, July 12, 2012 7:46:15 PM UTC+1, Anne Schilling wrote: Hi! The patch queue is currently broken with sage-5.1. Nicolas claims that he fixed this before lunch, so Chris, did you make changes since that break the queue? Thanks, Anne -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/Qiv01TbSDOQJ. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
