On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 07:09:53PM -0700, Andrew wrote:
>I agree with Dima in that it would be great to have some of the basic
>ring theory available in improved. There are some basic deficiencies
>with (Laurent) polynomial rings, especially in more than one variable
>and it would great if all of the problems with quite basic rings could
>be ironed out. In addition, my life would be much easier if sage were
>able to efficiently compute in the location of a ring at a ideal --
>what I would really like is to be able to calculate in modular systems
>"with parameters", which is my way of saying that I would like to be
>able to explicit calculations in modular systems for Iwahori-Hecke
>algebras. Implementing all of these gadgets is, perhaps, not so
>exciting from the point of view of a grant application, but not having
>these basic ring constructions available limits what you can currently
>do with sage.
+1. The big question here is whether we have someone with both the
expertise and time to implement those features, and whether the grant
could help provide us such a person ...
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
