[sage-combinat-devel] Re: bug in latex for CombinatorialFreeModule in elements in the root lattice
Is it okay if I open a ticket on that and provide a fix? Yes, please fix CombinatorialFreeModule! Is there a way to provide a latex prefix in addition to the prefix for CombinatorialFreeModule in order to get the alpha shown as an \alpha? Should I add this functionality as well? here is the patch: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10852 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
[sage-combinat-devel] Re: bug in latex for CombinatorialFreeModule in elements in the root lattice
On Friday, February 25, 2011 1:28:06 PM UTC-8, Christian Stump wrote: Is it okay if I open a ticket on that and provide a fix? Yes, please fix CombinatorialFreeModule! Is there a way to provide a latex prefix in addition to the prefix for CombinatorialFreeModule in order to get the alpha shown as an \alpha? Should I add this functionality as well? here is the patch: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10852 Could you please reconcile this with the patch at #9370? That implemented a latex prefix and various other things. (If you felt like refereeing #9370 at the same time, that would be helpful, too.) -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
[sage-combinat-devel] Re: bug in latex for CombinatorialFreeModule in elements in the root lattice
Could you please reconcile this with the patch at #9370? That implemented a latex prefix and various other things. (If you felt like refereeing #9370 at the same time, that would be helpful, too.) Thanks for letting me know. I will fold my patch into yours, if that's okay for you. Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
