(I thought I posted this last night, but don't see it now. Apologies if it is a duplicate.)
Thanks everyone for the discussion, and to Mike for the Set(list()) incantation. It looks like that will preserve the ordering on the output and I will not need to edit a long string of subsequent doctests. On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:36:30 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: > > Why is a set partition not a set of sets ? > My sentiment exactly. A newbie must first get over being returned an iterator (which is a good feature of the combinatorics routines). But then I'd hope that a request for objects that are sets would fully behave as sets, without further conversions. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
