[sage-devel] doc-main repository versus doc-2.6

2007-07-03 Thread Jack Schmidt

I noticed doc-main is missing quite a few files found in doc-2.6.
Some rather critical files are not version controlled, but on the
other hand a ton of garbage files are included.

I am working on version controlling the files that should be
controlled, writing some scripts to generate necessary empty files for
the clever documentation tricks, and some scripts to cleanup garbage
files.

Is this useful, or is someone else already doing this?

My goal is to make a freshly checked out doc-main functional, as in
make should just create the docs assuming one has tex and latex2html.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[sage-devel] new version of phcpack interface (phc.py)

2007-07-03 Thread Hamptonio

I have heavily altered the PHCpack interface for sage, and posted the
relevant files as sage-trac 399:

http://www.sagemath.org:9002/sage_trac/ticket/399

Comments are very welcome.

In order to get it working, I have temporarily removed some potential
functionality - the ability to pass in arbitrary command lists to
phc.  On the positive side, what is there works, and I have added some
parsing of the raw phc output to get at the final complex solutions of
the system.  Here is part of the Examples section to give an idea of
how it works:

EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.interfaces.phc import phc
sage: R.x,y = PolynomialRing(QQ,2)
sage: testsys = [x^2 + 1, x*y - 1]
sage: v = phc.blackbox(testsys, R)
sage: v.solutions()
[[1.00*I, -1.00*I], [-1.00*I,
1.00*I]]
sage: v.solution_dicts()
[{y: 1.00*I, x: -1.00*I}, {y:
-1.00*I, x: 1.00*I}]
sage: residuals = [[test_equation.subs(sol) for test_equation in
testsys] for sol in v.solution_dicts()]
sage: residuals
[[0, 0], [0, 0]]

-Marshall Hampton


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[sage-devel] Re: doc-main repository versus doc-2.6

2007-07-03 Thread Jack Schmidt

This is done.

The patch bundle is at http://www.ms.uky.edu/~jack/sage/doc-includefiles.hg

or you can probably pull from
http://www.ms.uky.edu/~jack/sage/hg/doc-includefiles


The following produces nice working documentation from source:

cd MYSAGE/devel/

hg init doc-test
cd doc-test
hg pull -u http://sagemath.org/sage/hg/doc-main
hg pull -u http://www.ms.uky.edu/~jack/sage/hg/doc-includefiles
make
hg status
ls paper-letter
ls html


On Jul 3, 11:17 am, Jack Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 I noticed doc-main is missing quite a few files found in doc-2.6.
 Some rather critical files are not version controlled, but on the
 other hand a ton of garbage files are included.

 I am working on version controlling the files that should be
 controlled, writing some scripts to generate necessary empty files for
 the clever documentation tricks, and some scripts to cleanup garbage
 files.

 Is this useful, or is someone else already doing this?

 My goal is to make a freshly checked out doc-main functional, as in
 make should just create the docs assuming one has tex and latex2html.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[sage-devel] Re: Block indentation!

2007-07-03 Thread Robert Bradshaw


On Jul 1, 2007, at 2:18 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:


 On Sunday 01 July 2007 09:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At long last, I've implemented the single most requested feature  
 of the
 notebook: block indent / unindent.

 Very cool.

 People have also made noise about block
 commenting / uncommenting.  Anybody have a preferred key combo?

 M-x  and M-x  just like emacs does it?

 Martin

I would vote for tab/shift-tab. If stuff is selected, do an indent,  
otherwise, do help like it is now.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---