[sage-devel] Re: trouble installing sage
On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:26:42 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > You can't build Sage with clang. Build Sage from scratch, this should have > installed GCC as part of the installation process. Make sure you have the > Xcode command line tools. > Well, Xcode and the command line tools are installed and now the following error occurs: make[5]: Nothing to be done for `install'. cats=""; for cat in $cats; do \ lang=`basename $cat | sed 's/\.gmo$//'`; \ if [ -f $cat ]; then :; \ elif [ -f ../../src/libcpp/$cat ]; then cat=../../src/libcpp/$cat; \ else continue; \ fi; \ dir=/Applications/sage/local/share/locale/$lang/LC_MESSAGES; \ echo /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 $cat $dir/cpplib.mo; \ /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 $cat $dir/cpplib.mo; \ done make[6]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[6]: Nothing to be done for `install'. /bin/sh ../../src/libiberty/../mkinstalldirs /Applications/sage/local/lib/`/usr/bin/clang -g -O2 -print-multi-os-directory` /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./libiberty.a /Applications/sage/local/lib/`/usr/bin/clang -g -O2 -print-multi-os-directory`/./libiberty.an install: /Applications/sage/local/lib/x86_64/./libiberty.an: Permission denied make[5]: *** [install_to_libdir] Error 71 make[4]: *** [install-libiberty] Error 2 make[3]: *** [install] Error 2 real17m29.186s user47m51.011s sys4m36.591s Error installing package gcc-4.7.3.p1 Please email sage-devel (http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel) explaining the problem and including the relevant part of the log file /Applications/sage/logs/pkgs/gcc-4.7.3.p1.log Describe your computer, operating system, etc. If you want to try to fix the problem yourself, *don't* just cd to /Applications/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/gcc-4.7.3.p1 and type 'make' or whatever is appropriate. Instead, the following commands setup all environment variables correctly and load a subshell for you to debug the error: (cd '/Applications/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/gcc-4.7.3.p1' && '/Applications/sage/sage' --sh) When you are done debugging, you can type "exit" to leave the subshell. make[2]: *** [/Applications/sage/local/var/lib/sage/installed/gcc-4.7.3.p1] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 real19m25.389s user49m43.368s sys5m40.166s *** Error building Sage. The following package(s) may have failed to build: package: gcc-4.7.3.p1 log file: /Applications/sage/logs/pkgs/gcc-4.7.3.p1.log build directory: /Applications/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/gcc-4.7.3.p1 The build directory may contain configuration files and other potentially helpful information. WARNING: if you now run 'make' again, the build directory will, by default, be deleted. Set the environment variable SAGE_KEEP_BUILT_SPKGS to 'yes' to prevent this. make: *** [build] Error 1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] where are the bots ?
The buildbot was having some issues and was reporting everything as a failure. I disabled it until I get a moment to fix it. On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > Hello, > > it seems that the bots have disappeared. Both the buildbot (was top left) > and the patchbot (top right). > > The patchbot links are broken (used to be colored little round things). > > And http://patchbot.sagemath.org points to William's homepage. > > Can we we hope that the bots will be back soon ? > > Frédéric > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Andrew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[sage-devel] where are the bots ?
Hello, it seems that the bots have disappeared. Both the buildbot (was top left) and the patchbot (top right). The patchbot links are broken (used to be colored little round things). And http://patchbot.sagemath.org points to William's homepage. Can we we hope that the bots will be back soon ? Frédéric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[sage-devel] Participation to consultation workshop
Hi everyone There will be a workshop at the EU on Nov 6, that I will be attending: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/consultation-workshop-mathematics-digital-science If anyone has a message to relay there, and I have the chance, I would be happy to do so. Even better, if there are drafts of EU proposals to show around to get feedback... Paul Paul-Olivier Dehaye SNF Assistant Professor of Mathematics University of Zurich http://user.math.uzh.ch/dehaye/contact_info.txt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[sage-devel] Re: trouble installing sage
You can't build Sage with clang. Build Sage from scratch, this should have installed GCC as part of the installation process. Make sure you have the Xcode command line tools. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[sage-devel] trouble installing sage
Hi! I am trying to install sage on someone's machine from source running MacOSX 10.9.4 and get the following error. Does anyone know what is going on? Anne --- Found local metadata for pkgconf-0.9.4 Found local sources at /Applications/sage/upstream/pkgconf-0.9.4.tar.bz2 Checksum: 2d353227f5dfbcaa2c0f48f045f828dac2abcff0 vs 2d353227f5dfbcaa2c0f48f045f828dac2abcff0 pkgconf-0.9.4 Setting up build directory for pkgconf-0.9.4 Finished set up Host system: Darwin computer.local 13.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.3.0: Tue Jun 3 21:27:35 PDT 2014; root:xnu-2422.110.17~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 C compiler: gcc C compiler version: Using built-in specs. Target: i686-apple-darwin11 Configured with: /private/var/tmp/llvmgcc42/llvmgcc42-2336.11~182/src/configure --disable-checking --enable-werror --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2 --mandir=/share/man --enable-languages=c,objc,c++,obj-c++ --program-prefix=llvm- --program-transform-name=/^[cg][^.-]*$/s/$/-4.2/ --with-slibdir=/usr/lib --build=i686-apple-darwin11 --enable-llvm=/private/var/tmp/llvmgcc42/llvmgcc42-2336.11~182/dst-llvmCore/Developer/usr/local --program-prefix=i686-apple-darwin11- --host=x86_64-apple-darwin11 --target=i686-apple-darwin11 --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.11.00) patching file Makefile.in checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/Applications/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pkgconf-0.9.4/src': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details Error configuring pkgconf. real0m0.252s user0m0.109s sys 0m0.114s Error installing package pkgconf-0.9.4 Please email sage-devel (http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel) explaining the problem and including the relevant part of the log file /Applications/sage/logs/pkgs/pkgconf-0.9.4.log Describe your computer, operating system, etc. If you want to try to fix the problem yourself, *don't* just cd to /Applications/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pkgconf-0.9.4 and type 'make' or whatever is appropriate. Instead, the following commands setup all environment variables correctly and load a subshell for you to debug the error: (cd '/Applications/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pkgconf-0.9.4' && '/Applications/sage/sage' --sh) When you are done debugging, you can type "exit" to leave the subshell. Found local metadata for pkgconf-0.9.4 Found local sources at /Applications/sage/upstream/pkgconf-0.9.4.tar.bz2 Checksum: 2d353227f5dfbcaa2c0f48f045f828dac2abcff0 vs 2d353227f5dfbcaa2c0f48f045f828dac2abcff0 pkgconf-0.9.4 Setting up build directory for pkgconf-0.9.4 Finished set up Host system: Darwin computer.local 13.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.3.0: Tue Jun 3 21:27:35 PDT 2014; root:xnu-2422.110.17~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 C compiler: gcc C compiler version: Using built-in specs. Target: i686-apple-darwin11 Configured with: /private/var/tmp/llvmgcc42/llvmgcc42-2336.11~182/src/configure --disable-checking --enable-werror --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2 --mandir=/share/man --enable-languages=c,objc,c++,obj-c++ --program-prefix=llvm- --program-transform-name=/^[cg][^.-]*$/s/$/-4.2/ --with-slibdir=/usr/lib --build=i686-apple-darwin11 --enable-llvm=/private/var/tmp/llvmgcc42/llvmgcc42-2336.11~182/dst-llvmCore/Developer/usr/local --program-prefix=i686-apple-darwin11- --host=x86_64-apple-darwin11 --target=i686-apple-darwin11 --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.11.00) patching file Makefile.in checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/Applications/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pkgconf-0.9.4/src': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details Error configuring pkgconf. real0m0.212s user0m0.108s sys 0m0.108s Error installing package pkgconf-0.9.4 Please email sage-devel (http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel) explaining the problem and i
Re: [sage-devel] Graphs and order of vertices
Here is an example that looks less artificial: sage: list(set([-1,-2])) [-2, -1] sage: list(set([-2,-1])) [-1, -2] sage: G=Graph(); G.add_vertex(-2); G.add_vertex(-1) sage: H=Graph(); H.add_vertex(-1); H.add_vertex(-2) sage: G == H True sage: G.vertices() == H.vertices() True sage: list(G.vertex_iterator()) == list(H.vertex_iterator()) False The trick underlying the example is the same as before: sage: hash(-1) == hash(-2) True Cheers, Erik Massop -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] Graphs and order of vertices
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:11:24 + Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > G=Graph() > > for i in range(0,10): G.add_vertex(randint(1,1000)) > > for x in G.vertex_iterator(): print x > > G.vertices() > > > > gives them in about random order. > > Nope. The order is not random. It is the one you get by doing list(set(X)). That, however, can depend on the order of X. For instance given class C: def __init__(self, v): self.v = v def __repr__(self): return "C(%r)" % (self.v,) def __hash__(self): return int(0) zero = C(0) one = C(1) when I do print list(set([zero,one])) print list(set([one,zero])) I obtain [C(0), C(1)] [C(1), C(0)] .. > sage: list(set(G.vertices())) == list(G.vertex_iterator()) > True > > You can have a look at how is coded vertex_iterator in the backend > (i.e. G._backend.iterator_verts). That can vary by backend, can it not? > > > I started thinking this when doing http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17173 . > > Nathann suggested using directly (sub)graphs instead of (sub)poset. It is > > OK with .vertices() but not with .vertex_iterator(); try > > > > G=Graph() > > for i in range(2,50): G.add_vertex(i) > > for i in range(2,50): > > if not is_prime(i): > > G.delete_vertex(i) > > for x in G.vertex_iterator(): print x > > > > This seems to be quite open door for nasty bugs. .vertex_iterator might > > give vertices in order when graph is small or has not been modified many > > times. > > The code is not very clean, but nevertheless the order of > .vertex_iterator does not depend on the way you built your graph. Do > you have an example where it is not the case ? Yes: G = Graph() G.add_vertex(zero) G.add_vertex(one) H = Graph() H.add_vertex(one) H.add_vertex(zero) print G == H print list(G.vertex_iterator()) == list(H.vertex_iterator()) print G.vertices() == H.vertices() gives me True False True .. Cheers, Erik Massop -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] Graphs and order of vertices
> G=Graph() > for i in range(0,10): G.add_vertex(randint(1,1000)) > for x in G.vertex_iterator(): print x > G.vertices() > > gives them in about random order. Nope. The order is not random. It is the one you get by doing list(set(X)). sage: list(set(G.vertices())) == list(G.vertex_iterator()) True You can have a look at how is coded vertex_iterator in the backend (i.e. G._backend.iterator_verts). > I started thinking this when doing http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17173 . > Nathann suggested using directly (sub)graphs instead of (sub)poset. It is > OK with .vertices() but not with .vertex_iterator(); try > > G=Graph() > for i in range(2,50): G.add_vertex(i) > for i in range(2,50): > if not is_prime(i): > G.delete_vertex(i) > for x in G.vertex_iterator(): print x > > This seems to be quite open door for nasty bugs. .vertex_iterator might > give vertices in order when graph is small or has not been modified many > times. The code is not very clean, but nevertheless the order of .vertex_iterator does not depend on the way you built your graph. Do you have an example where it is not the case ? Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Yosemite
If you look in the header the problem this time is precisely that the offending line is not guarded by #if OS_OBJECT_USE_OBJC On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 7:50:56 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > William Stein wrote: > > > This pattern has happened with literally every single OS X release: > > So true! Searching sage lists for '_scproxy' reveals that the failure > to build the _scproxy module happened before on new releases of OS X. > See the search results for sage-release [0] and sage-devel [1], with > especially thread [2], where Volker [3] suggested a workaround: > > The following workaround should help to get > around Apple's broken headers: > > CFLAGS="-DOS_OBJECT_USE_OBJC=0" > export CFLAGS > make > > Maybe this workaround could also help in the present situation? > > In the meanwhile, I sent a problem report to Apple via the > 'Feedback assistant'. > > [0] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sage-release/_scproxy > [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sage-devel/_scproxy > [2] https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/9B1GyPe6MAM/discussion > [3] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/9B1GyPe6MAM/lQTo4ZrbjlAJ > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
