[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:59 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 7, 8:53 am, Timothy Clemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of patches? The idea is to add doctests. One would add doctests to one file or directory of files and then open a ticket with a patch attached. We don't need loads of open tickets about missing doctests since someone has written them. -coverage let's you find out instantly where the problem areas are. Also, like all new patches in Sage, the new docstrings will be refereed, and will have to satisfy the referee. Fortunately, refereeing helps a lot in this regards. So you add doctests to a file or files, make a patch, post it to trac, and put [with patch; needs review] at the beginning of the ticket title. -- William --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
On Mar 6, 2008, at 1:01 PM, William Stein wrote: Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. This is one of the more difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a Sage Doc Days this Sunday. Whose interested in helping? Sure. david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
Sorry, I am tied up on Sunday (though possibly will no longer be by the time the sun rises over Seattle. Assuming that it does.) However I have benn trying to contribute to doctests where competent and will continue to do so when possible! John On 06/03/2008, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 6, 2008, at 1:01 PM, William Stein wrote: Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. This is one of the more difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a Sage Doc Days this Sunday. Whose interested in helping? Sure. david -- John Cremona --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
I would love to help! On Mar 6, 10:17 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I am tied up on Sunday (though possibly will no longer be by the time the sun rises over Seattle. Assuming that it does.) However I have benn trying to contribute to doctests where competent and will continue to do so when possible! John On 06/03/2008, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 6, 2008, at 1:01 PM, William Stein wrote: Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. This is one of the more difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a Sage Doc Days this Sunday. Whose interested in helping? Sure. david -- John Cremona --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
I will try to help, although my weekends get consumed by family obligations sometimes. I'm not sure what areas are low in coverage that I am competent to help with. Almost all of my use of sage involves optional packages - phcpack, biopython, and polymake. The easiest thing for me would be to add tests to those, but presumably they don't count for your purposes. -Marshall On Mar 6, 12:01 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. This is one of the more difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a Sage Doc Days this Sunday. Whose interested in helping? -- William -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
Will you be publishing a list of which modules are lacking acceptable doctest coverage? On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:01 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. This is one of the more difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a Sage Doc Days this Sunday. Whose interested in helping? -- William -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
I'm in. I'll likely work on either modular/hecke (24.7%) or modular/modsym (14.2%). -cc On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:01 AM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. This is one of the more difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a Sage Doc Days this Sunday. Whose interested in helping? -- William -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
I'll be there. So far I've been doctest-ing various files in sage/ rings (ring.pyx, ideal.pyx, integer_ring.pyx). I'd like to see where people want to see more detailed docstrings and doctests. -- Chris Swierczewski --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Chris Swierczewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be there. So far I've been doctest-ing various files in sage/ ^^ Hey, you're local. Want to meet at a coffee shop, e.g., one in Capitol Hill? Will you be publishing a list of which modules are lacking acceptable doctest coverage? Very good question! So in sage-2.10.3.rc2, the coverage score is 44.0% (and there are 18584 functions total). I got this by doing $ cd SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/ $ sage -coverage . algebras/algebra.py: 0% (0 of 1) algebras/algebra_element.py: 0% (0 of 1) ... Overall weighted coverage score: 44.0% Total number of functions: 18584 - Here's a breakdown by modules: ALGEBRAS: Overall weighted coverage score: 15.7% Total number of functions: 215 CALCULUS: Overall weighted coverage score: 50.7% Total number of functions: 495 CATEGORIES: Overall weighted coverage score: 15.1% Total number of functions: 278 CODING: Overall weighted coverage score: 80.0% Total number of functions: 117 COMBINAT: Overall weighted coverage score: 75.5% Total number of functions: 1919 CRYPTO: Overall weighted coverage score: 62.4% Total number of functions: 198 DATABASES: Overall weighted coverage score: 16.8% Total number of functions: 218 DSAGE: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 477 EXT: Overall weighted coverage score: 58.1% Total number of functions: 79 FUNCTIONS: Overall weighted coverage score: 56.7% Total number of functions: 402 GAMES: Overall weighted coverage score: 33.0% Total number of functions: 3 GEOMETRY: Overall weighted coverage score: 53.3% Total number of functions: 89 GRAPHS: Overall weighted coverage score: 71.9% Total number of functions: 444 GROUPS: Overall weighted coverage score: 53.4% Total number of functions: 420 GSL: Overall weighted coverage score: 29.1% Total number of functions: 82 INTERFACES: Overall weighted coverage score: 12.7% Total number of functions: 998 LFUNCTIONS: Overall weighted coverage score: 41.7% Total number of functions: 38 LIBS: Overall weighted coverage score: 55.3% Total number of functions: 1130 LOGIC: Overall weighted coverage score: 16.0% Total number of functions: 18 MATRIX: Overall weighted coverage score: 57.6% Total number of functions: 672 MEDIA: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 26 MISC: Overall weighted coverage score: 24.8% Total number of functions: 479 MODULAR: Overall weighted coverage score: 47.8% Total number of functions: 1198 MODULES: Overall weighted coverage score: 48.7% Total number of functions: 372 MONOIDS: Overall weighted coverage score: 54.8% Total number of functions: 87 NUMERICAL: Overall weighted coverage score: 60.0% Total number of functions: 5 PLOT: Overall weighted coverage score: 17.6% Total number of functions: 662 PROBABILITY: Overall weighted coverage score: 3.0% Total number of functions: 30 QUADRATIC_FORMS: Overall weighted coverage score: 22.8% Total number of functions: 48 RINGS: Overall weighted coverage score: 50.4% Total number of functions: 5021 SCHEMES: Overall weighted coverage score: 38.6% Total number of functions: 846 SERVER: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.7% Total number of functions: 854 SETS: Overall weighted coverage score: 81.1% Total number of functions: 71 STRUCTURE: Overall weighted coverage score: 26.2% Total number of functions: 452 TESTS: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 135 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 at 10:01AM -0800, William Stein wrote: Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. This is one of the more difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a Sage Doc Days this Sunday. Whose interested in helping? Since I opened a ticket complaining about documentation, I suppose I should! Dan -- --- Dan Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - KAIST Department of Mathematical Sciences --- http://math.kaist.ac.kr/~drake signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
On Mar 6, 3:06 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, you're local. Want to meet at a coffee shop, e.g., one in Capitol Hill? Sure thing! I'd like to get some Sage work done in the morning. (Algebra study session in the mid-afternoon.) Are there any other Seattle-ites out there who would like to join in on the festivities? -- Chris Swierczewski --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
I think the best one for me would be interfaces; if other people are interested in something in there please let me know so I don't duplicate effort. I am most interested in (and will start with) the phc, mathematica, and tachyon interfaces. Will this be coordinated on IRC, or a wiki, or something else? -M. Hampton On Mar 6, 5:06 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Chris Swierczewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be there. So far I've been doctest-ing various files in sage/ ^^ Hey, you're local. Want to meet at a coffee shop, e.g., one in Capitol Hill? Will you be publishing a list of which modules are lacking acceptable doctest coverage? Very good question! So in sage-2.10.3.rc2, the coverage score is 44.0% (and there are 18584 functions total). I got this by doing $ cd SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/ $ sage -coverage . algebras/algebra.py: 0% (0 of 1) algebras/algebra_element.py: 0% (0 of 1) ... Overall weighted coverage score: 44.0% Total number of functions: 18584 - Here's a breakdown by modules: ALGEBRAS: Overall weighted coverage score: 15.7% Total number of functions: 215 CALCULUS: Overall weighted coverage score: 50.7% Total number of functions: 495 CATEGORIES: Overall weighted coverage score: 15.1% Total number of functions: 278 CODING: Overall weighted coverage score: 80.0% Total number of functions: 117 COMBINAT: Overall weighted coverage score: 75.5% Total number of functions: 1919 CRYPTO: Overall weighted coverage score: 62.4% Total number of functions: 198 DATABASES: Overall weighted coverage score: 16.8% Total number of functions: 218 DSAGE: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 477 EXT: Overall weighted coverage score: 58.1% Total number of functions: 79 FUNCTIONS: Overall weighted coverage score: 56.7% Total number of functions: 402 GAMES: Overall weighted coverage score: 33.0% Total number of functions: 3 GEOMETRY: Overall weighted coverage score: 53.3% Total number of functions: 89 GRAPHS: Overall weighted coverage score: 71.9% Total number of functions: 444 GROUPS: Overall weighted coverage score: 53.4% Total number of functions: 420 GSL: Overall weighted coverage score: 29.1% Total number of functions: 82 INTERFACES: Overall weighted coverage score: 12.7% Total number of functions: 998 LFUNCTIONS: Overall weighted coverage score: 41.7% Total number of functions: 38 LIBS: Overall weighted coverage score: 55.3% Total number of functions: 1130 LOGIC: Overall weighted coverage score: 16.0% Total number of functions: 18 MATRIX: Overall weighted coverage score: 57.6% Total number of functions: 672 MEDIA: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 26 MISC: Overall weighted coverage score: 24.8% Total number of functions: 479 MODULAR: Overall weighted coverage score: 47.8% Total number of functions: 1198 MODULES: Overall weighted coverage score: 48.7% Total number of functions: 372 MONOIDS: Overall weighted coverage score: 54.8% Total number of functions: 87 NUMERICAL: Overall weighted coverage score: 60.0% Total number of functions: 5 PLOT: Overall weighted coverage score: 17.6% Total number of functions: 662 PROBABILITY: Overall weighted coverage score: 3.0% Total number of functions: 30 QUADRATIC_FORMS: Overall weighted coverage score: 22.8% Total number of functions: 48 RINGS: Overall weighted coverage score: 50.4% Total number of functions: 5021 SCHEMES: Overall weighted coverage score: 38.6% Total number of functions: 846 SERVER: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.7% Total number of functions: 854 SETS: Overall weighted coverage score: 81.1% Total number of functions: 71 STRUCTURE: Overall weighted coverage score: 26.2% Total number of functions: 452 TESTS: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 135 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:07 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the best one for me would be interfaces; if other people are interested in something in there please let me know so I don't duplicate effort. I am most interested in (and will start with) the phc, mathematica, and tachyon interfaces. Will this be coordinated on IRC, or a wiki, or something else? Yes, we'll meet on #sage-devel. Also, the wiki page for doc day 2 is here: http://wiki.sagemath.org/doc2 I hope we'll focus 100% on writing doctests. I also expect that we'll find and report lots of bugs in the course of writing doctests. The more we find the better. -M. Hampton On Mar 6, 5:06 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Chris Swierczewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be there. So far I've been doctest-ing various files in sage/ ^^ Hey, you're local. Want to meet at a coffee shop, e.g., one in Capitol Hill? Will you be publishing a list of which modules are lacking acceptable doctest coverage? Very good question! So in sage-2.10.3.rc2, the coverage score is 44.0% (and there are 18584 functions total). I got this by doing $ cd SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/ $ sage -coverage . algebras/algebra.py: 0% (0 of 1) algebras/algebra_element.py: 0% (0 of 1) ... Overall weighted coverage score: 44.0% Total number of functions: 18584 - Here's a breakdown by modules: ALGEBRAS: Overall weighted coverage score: 15.7% Total number of functions: 215 CALCULUS: Overall weighted coverage score: 50.7% Total number of functions: 495 CATEGORIES: Overall weighted coverage score: 15.1% Total number of functions: 278 CODING: Overall weighted coverage score: 80.0% Total number of functions: 117 COMBINAT: Overall weighted coverage score: 75.5% Total number of functions: 1919 CRYPTO: Overall weighted coverage score: 62.4% Total number of functions: 198 DATABASES: Overall weighted coverage score: 16.8% Total number of functions: 218 DSAGE: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 477 EXT: Overall weighted coverage score: 58.1% Total number of functions: 79 FUNCTIONS: Overall weighted coverage score: 56.7% Total number of functions: 402 GAMES: Overall weighted coverage score: 33.0% Total number of functions: 3 GEOMETRY: Overall weighted coverage score: 53.3% Total number of functions: 89 GRAPHS: Overall weighted coverage score: 71.9% Total number of functions: 444 GROUPS: Overall weighted coverage score: 53.4% Total number of functions: 420 GSL: Overall weighted coverage score: 29.1% Total number of functions: 82 INTERFACES: Overall weighted coverage score: 12.7% Total number of functions: 998 LFUNCTIONS: Overall weighted coverage score: 41.7% Total number of functions: 38 LIBS: Overall weighted coverage score: 55.3% Total number of functions: 1130 LOGIC: Overall weighted coverage score: 16.0% Total number of functions: 18 MATRIX: Overall weighted coverage score: 57.6% Total number of functions: 672 MEDIA: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 26 MISC: Overall weighted coverage score: 24.8% Total number of functions: 479 MODULAR: Overall weighted coverage score: 47.8% Total number of functions: 1198 MODULES: Overall weighted coverage score: 48.7% Total number of functions: 372 MONOIDS: Overall weighted coverage score: 54.8% Total number of functions: 87 NUMERICAL: Overall weighted coverage score: 60.0% Total number of functions: 5 PLOT: Overall weighted coverage score: 17.6% Total number of functions: 662 PROBABILITY: Overall weighted coverage score: 3.0% Total number of functions: 30 QUADRATIC_FORMS: Overall weighted coverage score: 22.8% Total number of functions: 48 RINGS: Overall weighted coverage score: 50.4% Total number of functions: 5021 SCHEMES: Overall weighted coverage score: 38.6% Total number of functions: 846 SERVER: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.7% Total number of functions: 854 SETS: Overall weighted coverage score: 81.1% Total number of functions: 71 STRUCTURE: Overall weighted coverage score: 26.2% Total number of functions: 452 TESTS: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 135 -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of patches? On Mar 6, 9:55 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:07 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the best one for me would be interfaces; if other people are interested in something in there please let me know so I don't duplicate effort. I am most interested in (and will start with) the phc, mathematica, and tachyon interfaces. Will this be coordinated on IRC, or a wiki, or something else? Yes, we'll meet on #sage-devel. Also, the wiki page for doc day 2 is here: http://wiki.sagemath.org/doc2 I hope we'll focus 100% on writing doctests. I also expect that we'll find and report lots of bugs in the course of writing doctests. The more we find the better. -M. Hampton On Mar 6, 5:06 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Chris Swierczewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be there. So far I've been doctest-ing various files in sage/ ^^ Hey, you're local. Want to meet at a coffee shop, e.g., one in Capitol Hill? Will you be publishing a list of which modules are lacking acceptable doctest coverage? Very good question! So in sage-2.10.3.rc2, the coverage score is 44.0% (and there are 18584 functions total). I got this by doing $ cd SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/ $ sage -coverage . algebras/algebra.py: 0% (0 of 1) algebras/algebra_element.py: 0% (0 of 1) ... Overall weighted coverage score: 44.0% Total number of functions: 18584 - Here's a breakdown by modules: ALGEBRAS: Overall weighted coverage score: 15.7% Total number of functions: 215 CALCULUS: Overall weighted coverage score: 50.7% Total number of functions: 495 CATEGORIES: Overall weighted coverage score: 15.1% Total number of functions: 278 CODING: Overall weighted coverage score: 80.0% Total number of functions: 117 COMBINAT: Overall weighted coverage score: 75.5% Total number of functions: 1919 CRYPTO: Overall weighted coverage score: 62.4% Total number of functions: 198 DATABASES: Overall weighted coverage score: 16.8% Total number of functions: 218 DSAGE: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 477 EXT: Overall weighted coverage score: 58.1% Total number of functions: 79 FUNCTIONS: Overall weighted coverage score: 56.7% Total number of functions: 402 GAMES: Overall weighted coverage score: 33.0% Total number of functions: 3 GEOMETRY: Overall weighted coverage score: 53.3% Total number of functions: 89 GRAPHS: Overall weighted coverage score: 71.9% Total number of functions: 444 GROUPS: Overall weighted coverage score: 53.4% Total number of functions: 420 GSL: Overall weighted coverage score: 29.1% Total number of functions: 82 INTERFACES: Overall weighted coverage score: 12.7% Total number of functions: 998 LFUNCTIONS: Overall weighted coverage score: 41.7% Total number of functions: 38 LIBS: Overall weighted coverage score: 55.3% Total number of functions: 1130 LOGIC: Overall weighted coverage score: 16.0% Total number of functions: 18 MATRIX: Overall weighted coverage score: 57.6% Total number of functions: 672 MEDIA: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 26 MISC: Overall weighted coverage score: 24.8% Total number of functions: 479 MODULAR: Overall weighted coverage score: 47.8% Total number of functions: 1198 MODULES: Overall weighted coverage score: 48.7% Total number of functions: 372 MONOIDS: Overall weighted coverage score: 54.8% Total number of functions: 87 NUMERICAL: Overall weighted coverage score: 60.0% Total number of functions: 5 PLOT: Overall weighted coverage score: 17.6% Total number of functions: 662 PROBABILITY: Overall weighted coverage score: 3.0% Total number of functions: 30 QUADRATIC_FORMS: Overall weighted coverage score: 22.8% Total number of functions: 48 RINGS: Overall weighted coverage score: 50.4% Total number of functions: 5021 SCHEMES: Overall weighted coverage score: 38.6% Total number of functions: 846 SERVER: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.7% Total number of functions: 854 SETS: Overall weighted coverage score: 81.1% Total number of functions: 71 STRUCTURE: Overall weighted coverage score: 26.2% Total number of functions: 452 TESTS: Overall weighted coverage score: 0.0% Total number of functions: 135 -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org
[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days
On Mar 7, 8:53 am, Timothy Clemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of patches? The idea is to add doctests. One would add doctests to one file or directory of files and then open a ticket with a patch attached. We don't need loads of open tickets about missing doctests since someone has written them. -coverage let's you find out instantly where the problem areas are. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
