Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On Apr 8, 2012, at 06:01 , William Stein wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Francis Clarke > wrote: >> >> >> On Friday, 6 April 2012 23:21:45 UTC+1, William wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> There is exactly one test failure in running the full "make ptestlong" >>> test suite after a clean build of Sage on OS X 10.7! It's in Polybori >> > > I just built on a "clean" 2009 Macbook Air with updated OS X 10.7.3 > and the latest XCode, and it took 291 minutes, built fine, and passed > absolutely *all* tests (including polybori). I tried sage-b13-lion, and the build blew up at the ECM package (I'll send the log to Jeroen). I don't mind making the requirement that, for 10.7, the user must upgrade to 10.7.3/Xcode 4.3[.?]; but, personally, I can't make that move until I have a better understanding of the implications for my files and "the cloud". I think that is the one potential gotcha in making the requirement, but it is necessary, given the poor state of the initial releases of the OS and Xcode. The amount of effort that Sage developers have expended on this is impressive, and a credit to the team. If this works as well as it seems, I think it's high time to move on. Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds --- I want to die, peacefully in my sleep, like my grandfather; not screaming in terror, like his passengers. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
For those who can't install MPIR, please try the new spkg from #11616: ./sage -f http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/mpir-2.4.0.p2.spkg and send me spkg/logs/mpir-2.4.0.p2.log (regardless of whether the install succeeded) -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On 2012-04-06 17:01, William Stein wrote: > For me it fails much earlier: > > checking for x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0-gcc... > /Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/spkg/build/gcc-4.6.3/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc > -B/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/spkg/build/gcc-4.6.3/gcc-build/./gcc/ > -B/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/bin/ > -B/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/lib/ > -isystem > /Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/include > -isystem > /Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/sys-include > checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in > `/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/spkg/build/gcc-4.6.3/gcc-build/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/libgcc': > configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile > See `config.log' for more details. > make[4]: *** [configure-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 1 > make[3]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 William, could you please post the output of the following commands on that system: $ which cc $ which gcc $ which clang $ cc --version $ gcc --version $ clang --version A fix for this problem should be #12820. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On 2012-04-08 15:01, William Stein wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Francis Clarke > wrote: >> >> >> On Friday, 6 April 2012 23:21:45 UTC+1, William wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> There is exactly one test failure in running the full "make ptestlong" >>> test suite after a clean build of Sage on OS X 10.7! It's in Polybori >> > > I just built on a "clean" 2009 Macbook Air with updated OS X 10.7.3 > and the latest XCode, and it took 291 minutes, built fine, and passed > absolutely *all* tests (including polybori). As far as I can tell, there are currently some problems on OS X 10.7 with older versions of XCode, but newer versions seem to work well. Except some development in the coming betas. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Francis Clarke wrote: > > > On Friday, 6 April 2012 23:21:45 UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> There is exactly one test failure in running the full "make ptestlong" >> test suite after a clean build of Sage on OS X 10.7! It's in Polybori > I just built on a "clean" 2009 Macbook Air with updated OS X 10.7.3 and the latest XCode, and it took 291 minutes, built fine, and passed absolutely *all* tests (including polybori). -- William > On my MacBook Pro [OS 10.7.3, 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4 GB] it built fine > (after 12 hours), and "make ptestlong" gave rise to no failures at all. In > particular, > > sage -t --long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx" > [7.0 s] > > -- > All tests passed! > Total time for all tests: 7.0 seconds > > Francis Clarke > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On Friday, 6 April 2012 23:21:45 UTC+1, William wrote: > > Hi, > > There is exactly one test failure in running the full "make ptestlong" > test suite after a clean build of Sage on OS X 10.7! It's in Polybori > On my MacBook Pro [OS 10.7.3, 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4 GB] it built fine (after 12 hours), and "make ptestlong" gave rise to no failures at all. In particular, sage -t --long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx" [7.0 s] -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 7.0 seconds Francis Clarke -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
I tried again with CC-clang and it fails at make[1]: *** [installed/mpir-2.1.3.p10] Error 1 Here are pointers to logs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/bic/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/tail-100-install.log http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/bic/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/head-100-install.log http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/bic/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/install.log http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/bic/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/mpir-2.1.3.p10.log Thanks. -Bruce On Apr 6, 8:49 am, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-04-06 17:01, William Stein wrote:> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:34 PM, > Bruce Cohen wrote: > >> I ran a make last night, but it did not work. I'm attaching > > > For me it fails much earlier: > > Please try > > $ export CC=clang > $ make > > and report whether that works. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
Hi, There is exactly one test failure in running the full "make ptestlong" test suite after a clean build of Sage on OS X 10.7! It's in Polybori (see below). That's it. Absolutely everything else passes. This means the goal of getting Sage ported to 10.7 enough for the Sage-5.0 release is "99.99%" there. sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx ^[[?1034h** File "/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx", line 120: sage: for f in I2.groebner_basis(): f Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "", line 1, in for f in I2.groebner_basis():###line 120: sage: for f in I2.groebner_basis(): File "pbori.pyx", line 4852, in sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomialIdeal.groebner_basis (sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.cpp:28192) sig_on() RuntimeError: Aborted ** File "/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx", line 4839: sage: I.groebner_basis() Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "", line 1, in I.groebner_basis()###line 4839: sage: I.groebner_basis() File "pbori.pyx", line 4852, in sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomialIdeal.groebner_basis (sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.cpp:28192) sig_on() RuntimeError: Aborted On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:32 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> On 2012-04-06 17:01, William Stein wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote: I ran a make last night, but it did not work. I'm attaching >>> >>> For me it fails much earlier: >> Please try >> >> $ export CC=clang >> $ make >> >> and report whether that works. > > It works! The build completed fine, and I just ran the tests in > libs/pari and they all passed. I'm waiting for the docs to build and > the rest of "make ptestlong" to run. > > William -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-04-06 17:01, William Stein wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote: >>> I ran a make last night, but it did not work. I'm attaching >> >> For me it fails much earlier: > Please try > > $ export CC=clang > $ make > > and report whether that works. It works! The build completed fine, and I just ran the tests in libs/pari and they all passed. I'm waiting for the docs to build and the rest of "make ptestlong" to run. William -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On 2012-04-06 17:01, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote: >> I ran a make last night, but it did not work. I'm attaching > > For me it fails much earlier: Please try $ export CC=clang $ make and report whether that works. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote: > I ran a make last night, but it did not work. I'm attaching For me it fails much earlier: checking for x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0-gcc... /Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/spkg/build/gcc-4.6.3/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/spkg/build/gcc-4.6.3/gcc-build/./gcc/ -B/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/bin/ -B/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/lib/ -isystem /Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/include -isystem /Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/local/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/sys-include checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in `/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/spkg/build/gcc-4.6.3/gcc-build/x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/libgcc': configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile See `config.log' for more details. make[4]: *** [configure-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 1 make[3]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 real4m10.944s user6m58.470s sys 1m27.258s Error installing package gcc-4.6.3 --- deep:sage-5.0.beta12-gcc wstein$ gcc --version i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.15.00) Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See: http://wstein.org/home/wstein/tmp/install-5.0.beta12-gcc.log > config.log and an edited version of install.log. The original > install.log is too big to mail. The error appears to be > > Error installing package mpir-2.1.3.p10 > > > If it would be helpful, I can do another run this weekend after you > make some suggestions for getting this to work. > > Thanks > > -Bruce > > SAGE_CHECK=yes > MAKE=make -j4 > > gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.1.00) > > Mac OS X Lion 10.7.3 (11D50b) > Processor 2.3 GHz Intel Core i5 > > bash-3.2$ gcc -print-prog-name=as > /Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin11/4.2.1/as > bash-3.2$ as --version > FATAL:/Developer/usr/bin/../libexec/as/x86_64/as: I don't understand '-' flag! > > > > --- > > > On Apr 3, 6:11 am, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the >> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes: >> >> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta1... > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
I ran a make last night, but it did not work. I'm attaching config.log and an edited version of install.log. The original install.log is too big to mail. The error appears to be Error installing package mpir-2.1.3.p10 If it would be helpful, I can do another run this weekend after you make some suggestions for getting this to work. Thanks -Bruce SAGE_CHECK=yes MAKE=make -j4 gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.1.00) Mac OS X Lion 10.7.3 (11D50b) Processor 2.3 GHz Intel Core i5 bash-3.2$ gcc -print-prog-name=as /Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin11/4.2.1/as bash-3.2$ as --version FATAL:/Developer/usr/bin/../libexec/as/x86_64/as: I don't understand '-' flag! --- On Apr 3, 6:11 am, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the > following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes: > > http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta1... -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org config.log Description: Binary data install.log-edited-down Description: Binary data
Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 4/3/12 8:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the >> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes: >> >> >> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar >> > > > I have a student who is trying to build on 10.7 on a 2-year old laptop. It may depend on the version of XCode he has installed. > Does he need to define SAGE_PORT=yes when trying to compile this version? If it immediately fails, then obviously yes. > I assume he needs to use this version rather than the normal beta12, right? I think he could build the normal beta12, but he would be testing something completely different, right? (The normal one would likely build, but fail a lot of tests due to compiler bugs, depending on XCode version.) Jereon's specifically interested in having this tarball tested. william > Thanks, > > Jason > > > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On 4/3/12 8:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar I have a student who is trying to build on 10.7 on a 2-year old laptop. Does he need to define SAGE_PORT=yes when trying to compile this version? I assume he needs to use this version rather than the normal beta12, right? Thanks, Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
> > 10.7.3. But I think it's on the slowest oldest ibook that will run lion:-) > > Newer 10.7 OS on older system; I'm the reverse. What does 'About This Mac' > say your processor is? I am running 10.7.3 on a newer Macbook Pro (2.2 GHz i7) and I get a build failure with 5.0beta1. Like Justin, I have a configure error building MPIR: configure: error: could not find a working compiler, see config.log for details. Dan -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 6:11:48 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the > following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes: > > > http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar > On one machine, with SAGE_CHECK unset, all tests passed. On another machine, with SAGE_CHECK=yes, self-tests failed for zn_poly, as they do sometime when the system is heavily loaded. After working around that, all tests passed. -- John -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.7 testers needed
On 2012-04-03, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the > following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes: > > http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar > needless to say, sqrt5.cs.washington.edu is down again... -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
