[sage-devel] Re: Totally real number fields: Talk at MIT

2007-10-27 Thread John Voight

Wow, cool!  Thanks!  JV


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[sage-devel] Re: Totally real number fields: Talk at MIT

2007-10-26 Thread John Cremona

I use foiltex too.  If you add

\usepackage[nomarkers]{pause}

at the top then they go away!

John

On 26/10/2007, John Voight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 Will suggested that I forward along the notes from my talk in the MIT
 number theory seminar yesterday.  It gives my experience trying to
 enumerate totally real number fields, and compares Magma, Pari, and
 SAGE for my specific problem.
http://www.cems.uvm.edu/~voight/totallyreal_mit.pdf
 (Sorry about the orange squares, they're a vestige of foiltex...)

 Yours,

 John Voight
 Assistant Professor of Mathematics
 University of Vermont
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.cems.uvm.edu/~voight/


 



-- 
John Cremona

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---