On Jun 19, 4:31 pm, Hamptonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, the singular output is nice.I don't use such big rings,
but I very often use two blocks: variables and parameters.
On Jun 19, 7:26 am, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 14:55, Martin Albrecht wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to gather some options on the way multivariate polynomial
rings are printed in SAGE.
Sorry for replying to myself, I meant to gather opinions not options of
course. In case you wondered ...
Martin
I agree, it looks pretty good and since I create rather large rings
with CTC for example I would certainly prefer something like that.
Slightly OT: Do you plan to release the Small Scale AES with you
mutlivariate crypto system package any time soon? I have some code to
create SymbolicData.org output for the CTC examples (which still needs
to be cleaned up). I am currently at CoCoA School and next week is
MEGA, so I won't be able to play with it for at least another 10 days
- so no preassure from me :)
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
