Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.rc5 released

[Matthias Köppe]

I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31786 
Meta-ticket: Support gcc 11 

This should be for Sage 9.4

On Saturday, May 1, 2021 at 1:41:40 PM UTC-7 François Bissey wrote:

>
>
> > On 2/05/2021, at 06:57, Dima Pasechnik  wrote:
> > 
> > I'd rather try gcc 11 instead.
>
> If you want. We already have an issue in compiling fplll
> https://github.com/fplll/fplll/issues/462
> and sage itself doesn’t compile because of some issue in lcalc
> as far as I can see.
> https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/634
>
> François

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/e481c3b2-cb0f-44a6-a2c2-36511c234018n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.rc5 released

[Matthias Köppe]

On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 4:13:29 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>
> c27d4d6803 (tag: 9.3.rc5, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.3.rc5
>

Thanks for preparing the new release candidate.

Following up on my previous summary of GH Actions runs for 9.3.rc2 in 
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/6WjKQt_e_B8/m/dpx1qILOCwAJ:

First time in a long time that the *cygwin-standard* build on GH Actions 
ran through. We have not done anything to fix 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31565 ("Build still non-portable despite 
SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes because of numpy 
"), so this could either be a 
result of chance, or due to changes in Cygwin or changes to how GH Actions 
allocates machines. There are a number of doctest failures 
(https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/2485275132) that result from running 
the doctests without building the documentation first. Overall looking good.

The issue with *fedora-34* system NTL 
(https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31624), first reported for 9.3.beta8, has 
become critical now that Fedora 34 has been released. I would suggest that 
we make an emergency fix to the ntl spkg-configure.m4 so that it rejects 
system NTL if we reject system gcc.


 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/3eab23af-dc10-40ea-b3e7-00e6d58892f5n%40googlegroups.com.