Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released
Hi, On a fresh install from sources on Debian Sid build and documentation are ok, but tests sometimes fail : make: *** [Makefile:190: ptestlong] Error 17 -- MB. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/10a9e3e4-0c5f-6740-a891-3461994dd956%40inria.fr. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released
On 8/20/20 11:58 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:57 PM Maxime Bombar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On a fresh install from sources on Debian Sid build and documentation >> are ok, but tests sometimes fail : >> >> make: *** [Makefile:190: ptestlong] Error 17 > More details please - which tests have failed? > (normally there should be a summary report at the end of testing session) > > Thanks > Dima >> -- >> MB. >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "sage-release" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/10a9e3e4-0c5f-6740-a891-3461994dd956%40inria.fr. Oh yes sure, sorry I didn't see it. It that the following ? sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/doc/en/constructions/algebraic_geometry.rst # 1 doctest failed sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/doc/en/reference/sat/index.rst # Killed due to segmentation fault sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py # Killed due to abort sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/modules/fg_pid/fgp_module.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/modules/free_module_morphism.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/rings/complex_arb.pyx # 6 doctests failed sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx # Killed due to abort sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_sequence.py # Killed due to abort sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/rings/real_arb.pyx # 2 doctests failed sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring_constructor.py # Killed due to abort sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/sat/boolean_polynomials.py # Killed due to abort sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py # Killed due to abort sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/monsky_washnitzer.py # Killed due to abort I can be more specific by digging into the log file, for instance : File "src/doc/en/constructions/algebraic_geometry.rst", line 145, in doc.en.constructions.algebraic_geometry Failed example: print(L) Expected: [1]: _[1]=y _[2]=x ... Got: [1]: _[1]=y^2+y+1 _[2]=x+1 [2]: _[1]=y^2+y+1 _[2]=x+y+1 [3]: _[1]=y^2+y+1 _[2]=x+y [4]: _[1]=y^2+y+1 _[2]=x [5]: _[1]=y+1 _[2]=x^2+x+1 [6]: _[1]=y+1 _[2]=x+1 [7]: _[1]=y+1 _[2]=x [8]: _[1]=y _[2]=x^2+x+1 [9]: _[1]=y _[2]=x+1 [10]: _[1]=y _[2]=x Best, -- MB. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/4884af9a-7f02-a9a7-534a-338ecfe76700%40inria.fr.
Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released
On 8/20/20 4:24 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > It would be good to know which of these still fail if you run them > separately. I have exactly the same result by running them separately. I tried running those tests with sage9.1, and both `src/sage/rings/real_arb.pyx` and `src/sage/rings/complex_arb.pyx` failed with the same error as 9.2.beta9 but the other tests passed. How can I be more helpful ? Best, -- Maxime Bombar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/a03d7375-1e2b-6ed9-681d-eae0fb4dfba8%40inria.fr.
Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released
On 8/20/20 5:05 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > segfaults and aborts you get from tests are kind of worrying. Could it > be that you have "rogue" libraries in /usr/local, which get picked up > instead of system ones? > > Perhaps, post the main config.log > Hi, I upgraded to beta10, and every segfault is now gone. I bet it was an edge case of forbidding a recent version of some compiler like gcc. There is only one abortion left (src/sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/monsky_washnitzer.py ), but it seems to be documented here https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29719#comment:17, because on debian unstable libflint-dev depends on libflint-2.6.3, and libflint-dev was recommended in the installation guide for later version than debian buster. It could be a good idea to ensure flint version to be less than 2.6.3, as it was done for gcc and gfortran before beta10. How do you think ? Should I open a ticket ? I uninstalled this lib from my system, and the test now passes. I will continue to look at the other failures. Best, -- MB. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/8d47374c-967d-b16e-c203-4e8213c6e3d6%40inria.fr.
Re: [sage-release] Final 9.6 upgrade is catastrophic on Debian testing
On 5/16/22 23:56, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: After perusing the failures log and some wild guesses, problem worked around by |./configure --with-system-python=no|. Does this problem deserve reporting to Debian (/i. e./ filing a ticket against Debian|python3| package) ? I just tried on Debian unstable, with the same Python version as in Debian testing, and I didn't get any error at all (all tests passed) either with Sage's own Python (3.10.3), or with Debian' s version (3.10.4). Maybe it is something fixed between testing and unstable, or there is another issue, but in any case I don't think this problem deserves reporting to Debian. -- Maxime -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/5cfc8a87-ce7f-2db6-d5ba-973b227ad86e%40inria.fr. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
