[sage-support] More Extreme Newbie Development Questions

2008-02-17 Thread dean moore
Took me awhile to respond.  Distractions.

Last generated a few responses, replying to all under a new subject line
(last thread was getting clogged), in no particular order,

 David Joyner:

 Thanks for the cool gif!
 It would be great f you could post it to
 http://wiki.sagemath.org/pics
 (or it you tell me what to post, I will for you).

Futzed around, logged in, but couldn't figure it how to post it.  Attached.
It's easy to
modify the original source code at  https://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1687/ 
 juggle
constant to make various relations.  Thanks if you can post this, or tell me
how!

 mabshoff:

 We want to channel traffic into two mailing lists: sage-support for
 everything that isn't an developer issue and sage-devel for developers
 issue. Many issues on sage-newbie didn't get the attention they needed
 because too few people were reading it. Your chances to get replies
 are much better on sage-support.

I thought sage newbie no longer existed.  Do correct me  all else if I
am confused.

 Jason Grout:

 This is great stuff!  I think it's a perfect place to post it.

 We really ought to set up a library of wonderfully documented examples
 of how to use Sage, something like the Maple application center or the
 Mathematica Demonstrations project.  The current list of notebooks

Thanks.  Glancing at the published notebooks, many are quickie solutions
(and not documented at all -- no top documentation saying This program
differentiates polynomials; we use this logic ... shuts off my brain) to
narrowly-focussed problems not of much interest to, say a high school /
college
student wanting to know, What's this SAGE thing about?  What's in it for
*me*?

Might be good to have separate sets of examples for varied grade levels.
Most
college kids are concerned about learning differentiation  integration,
solving
DE's, systems, engineering/science problems, -- not learning what a parabola
is
(though I've taught a few ...).

Just an idea.

 Dean, you mentioned the frustration of trying to learn a new system.
 Was there anything that we could have done to make it easier (sorry
 about the unanswered posts to sage-newbie; we all kind of dropped the
 ball with keeping up with so many different mailing lists).

There's always that learning curve, shaking a fist at the computer, then the
Aha!
moments.  Wish I had a good answer.  Lots of good WELL-DOCUMENTED examples?
Then I can browse published worksheets, Oh, this person did this thing at
least
related to what I'm looking at?

And maybe a place to post those *** well-documented examples *** for review,
Here's a nifty workbook I did that illustrates the manifold uses of
spendiferous
functions, or maybe more importantly, This worksheet illustrates how to
use
SAGE to do this not-easy-to-code thing? (whatever), and someone reviews it,
Yes, darn it, that is solid; let's post it for all under a name that makes
sense (another problem with the published worksheets).

Elsewhere observed,

 ... it is not organized or searchable (I don't think) ...

This needs work.  Having played with SAGE a bit, I see it trying to go from
being a garage band to Led Zeppelin (well, that's overstating a bit), and
sometimes the old ideas need revamped.

 Dean, I guess I should add that just last year, I was a newbie sage user
 as well.  I felt how much people welcomed newcomers and cared about
 helping people get up to speed ...

You guys / gals / whoever were pretty cool.  When questions went unanswered
I
kind of figured, Oh, we all live busy lives.  I had the impression that
others wanted quickie answers -- those happen, but don't count on them
often.  Can't one set a welcome message to all new users of a group to
make policies clear?

Would love to do some development of whatever, examples, documentation,
wherever, a
worthwhile  contribution, and doubtless I'm not alone.  Some things could
perhaps be
more clear, We need more good functionality in this small subset of
calculus, The
spendiferous functions code is poorly documented, full of magic numbers 
obscure
logic  needs cleaned up (whatever).

Dean

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[sage-support] upgrade vs version

2008-02-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

I have installed sage 2.9.  I ran  sage -upgrade on tuesday,
february the 12. Do I now have the current version, 2.10.1 (dated from
february the 02)?

Thx,

JPD

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[sage-support] Re: upgrade vs version

2008-02-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Also, you can write at the prompt:

version()

regards.

On 18 feb, 04:10, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,

  I have installed sage 2.9.  I ran  sage -upgrade on tuesday,
  february the 12. Do I now have the current version, 2.10.1 (dated from
  february the 02)?

 Unless the upgrade failed somehow the banner now should say

 --
 | SAGE Version 2.10.1, Release Date: 2008-02-02                      |
 | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
 --

 If it doesn't something went wrong.

  Thx,

  JPD

 Cheers,

 Michael

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---