[sage-support] Re: 5.9 build issue (source build)

[chexmix]

Thanks!

I of course got the same thing back from the manipulations of the 
'gen_cf_gmp.cc' file that arojas did. 

Just replaced the file with singular-3-1-5.p8.spkg and kicked off 
compilation.

/Glenn

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[sage-support] new OpenOpt Suite release 0.50

[dmitrey]

 

Hi all,

I'm glad to inform you about new OpenOpt Suite release 0.50 (2013-June-15):

* interalg  (solver with specifiable 
accuracy) now works many times (sometimes orders) faster on (possibly 
multidimensional) integration problems (IP ) and on 
some optimization problems
* Add modeling dense (MI)(QC)QP  in FuncDesigner 
(alpha-version, rendering may work slowly yet)
* Bugfix for cplex  wrapper
* Some improvements for FuncDesigner interval analysis (and thus 
interalg)
* Add FuncDesigner interval analysis for *tan* in range(-pi/2,pi/2)
* Some other bugfixes and improvements
* (Proprietary) FuncDesigner stochastic 
addonnow is available as standalone 
*pyc*-file, became available for Python3 as well 

Regards, Dmitrey.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: [sage-support] Re: Can I display |implicit_plot| as a square no matter of the ranges?

[Georgi Guninski]

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 04:19:04AM -0700, P Purkayastha wrote:
> Depending on your plot you might have to use aspect_ratio=1/1000. You may 
> also try aspect_ratio='automatic'.
>

This works, thank you.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[sage-support] Re: Can I display |implicit_plot| as a square no matter of the ranges?

[P Purkayastha]

Depending on your plot you might have to use aspect_ratio=1/1000. You may 
also try aspect_ratio='automatic'.

On Saturday, June 15, 2013 7:16:48 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
> Does aspect ratio work? Something like
>
> implicit_plot(F, (0,1), (0,1000), aspect_ratio=1000)
>
> On Saturday, June 15, 2013 6:13:35 PM UTC+8, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>>
>> Basically I am doing: 
>>
>> P=implicit_plot(F,(0,1),(0,1000)) 
>>
>> The result is a very thin rectangle extremely hard to interpret 
>> and I want it displayed as a square or close to square. 
>> P.show(figsize=[10,5]) doesn't seem to work? 
>>
>> Can I display the above example as a square plot? 
>>
>> Know that can use  x=(0,1000) and compute F(x/1000,y), 
>> but this screws the labelling of x. 
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[sage-support] Re: Can I display |implicit_plot| as a square no matter of the ranges?

[P Purkayastha]

Does aspect ratio work? Something like

implicit_plot(F, (0,1), (0,1000), aspect_ratio=1000)

On Saturday, June 15, 2013 6:13:35 PM UTC+8, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>
> Basically I am doing: 
>
> P=implicit_plot(F,(0,1),(0,1000)) 
>
> The result is a very thin rectangle extremely hard to interpret 
> and I want it displayed as a square or close to square. 
> P.show(figsize=[10,5]) doesn't seem to work? 
>
> Can I display the above example as a square plot? 
>
> Know that can use  x=(0,1000) and compute F(x/1000,y), 
> but this screws the labelling of x. 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[sage-support] Can I display |implicit_plot| as a square no matter of the ranges?

[Georgi Guninski]

Basically I am doing:

P=implicit_plot(F,(0,1),(0,1000))

The result is a very thin rectangle extremely hard to interpret
and I want it displayed as a square or close to square.
P.show(figsize=[10,5]) doesn't seem to work?

Can I display the above example as a square plot?

Know that can use  x=(0,1000) and compute F(x/1000,y), 
but this screws the labelling of x.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.