Re: error 404

2002-07-11 Thread Nev Young
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:20:35 +0100 , Winkless, Geoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nev Young wrote:
  they're about 3000 x 2000 pixels and the jpegs are 440K - 825K.  
  I can try and redo them at lower resolution but I'm scanning from the
  tech manual and it's a poor photo copy to start with.
 
 JPEG for line drawings? Yeuck.
I know !

 
 Scan them in, run them through some line routines in (eg) paint shop pro and
 then save as .gif
 
I must be doing something wrong as I can't get a better image and the
.gif is 2 1/2 times larger than the jpg.   

any suggestions ?

Nev



Re: error 404

2002-07-11 Thread Nev Young
On Sun, 07 Jul 2002 11:30:36 +0200, Frans van Egmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think a lower resolution would be a bad idea...
 Keep them the way they are now...
 Will you be doing the whole tech manual at some point, perhaps as a Pdf ?
 Thanks.
 
Well If I can find the time I can scan it in (OMG what have I just
done) but I don't have the means to make a pdf.   I'm sure some one
can help.  I'll look through all my tech manuals to see which is the
best copy and use that.



Re: error 404

2002-07-07 Thread Nev Young
On Sat, 06 Jul 2002 19:29:11 +0200, Frans van Egmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Absolutely, what size did you scan them in?
 
they're about 3000 x 2000 pixels and the jpegs are 440K - 825K.  
I can try and redo them at lower resolution but I'm scanning from the
tech manual and it's a poor photo copy to start with.

Nev



Re: error 404

2002-07-07 Thread Frans van Egmond




I think a lower resolution would be a bad idea...
Keep them the way they are now...
Will you be doing the whole tech manual at some point, perhaps as a Pdf ?
Thanks.

Frans


Nev Young wrote:

  On Sat, 06 Jul 2002 19:29:11 +0200, Frans van Egmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
Absolutely, what size did you scan them in?


  
  they're about 3000 x 2000 pixels and the jpegs are 440K - 825K.  
I can try and redo them at lower resolution but I'm scanning from the
tech manual and it's a poor photo copy to start with.

Nev



  






Re: error 404

2002-07-06 Thread Tim P
 found that http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/sskardon is no longer valid.

Guessing that means Stewart Skardon, I've currently linked to:

http://www.sskardon.fsnet.co.uk/

(which is probably the real location of www.sam-coupe.co.uk, not to be
confused with www.samcoupe.co.uk or www.samcoupe.com).

HTH,
Tim



RE: error 404

2002-07-06 Thread Stewart Skardon
Guess this is a prompt for me to make a rare appearance on the list!

That's right, my site is now based at www.sskardon.fsnet.co.uk, but
www.sam-coupe.co.uk is the url I always quote as I think it's slightly
easier to remember!

Actually, I am planning a site update this weekend, so any changes or
additional information to add would be welcomed.

Hope everyone is keeping well!

Regards,

Stewart

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Tim P
Sent: 06 July 2002 09:15
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: error 404


 found that http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/sskardon is no longer valid.

Guessing that means Stewart Skardon, I've currently linked to:

http://www.sskardon.fsnet.co.uk/

(which is probably the real location of www.sam-coupe.co.uk, not to be
confused with www.samcoupe.co.uk or www.samcoupe.com).

HTH,
Tim




Re: error 404

2002-07-06 Thread Nev Young
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 11:08:17 +0100, Stewart Skardon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Guess this is a prompt for me to make a rare appearance on the list!
 
 That's right, my site is now based at www.sskardon.fsnet.co.uk, but
 www.sam-coupe.co.uk is the url I always quote as I think it's slightly
 easier to remember!
Thanks I've updated my links.

 
 Actually, I am planning a site update this weekend, so any changes or
 additional information to add would be welcomed.
I recently scanned the circuit diagrams of the sam.  Would they be any
use on a web page ?


Nev



Re: error 404

2002-07-06 Thread Frans van Egmond




Absolutely, what size did you scan them in?

Frans

Nev Young wrote:

  On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 11:08:17 +0100, "Stewart Skardon"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
Guess this is a prompt for me to make a rare appearance on the list!

That's right, my site is now based at www.sskardon.fsnet.co.uk, but
www.sam-coupe.co.uk is the url I always quote as I think it's slightly
easier to remember!

  
  Thanks I've updated my links.

  
  
Actually, I am planning a site update this weekend, so any changes or
additional information to add would be welcomed.

  
  I recently scanned the circuit diagrams of the sam.  Would they be any
use on a web page ?


Nev