Re: [Samba] Samba and NT 4.0
Hi The best way is to add a unix user and group named pcguest and then set guest account = pcguest in the global options and read list = pcguest in your share, this will make any pc on your lan able to read from the share, if you want write access, then just put writ list = pcguest and read only = No guest ok = Yes Male sure all your computers are in the same workgroup as the samba server and that you don't have any ip restictions in your smb.conf blocking your NT boxes. Also if your running any kind of firewalls on your NT's, this might couse the 'no service' problem. regards Rasmus Nielsen At 15:40 28-04-2002 -0700, Keith wrote: Good Afternoon all! Hey I have been having one heck of a time getting my NT boxes to access my Samba Server. At this point I get a message saying there is no service responding at the remote network. I have tried everything at this point and am at my wit's end. Does anyone have a smb.conf file that is working for them at this point in the same environment? Is there something else that could be the issue? I want to set up a network environment where no passwords are needed to go from the NT boxes to the Samba Server. Are passwords a must? What else should I be looking at? My main goal is to get the FTP server that is running on the NT environment to map to the web directories on my Linux box. Any and all help is appreciated. Keith Kasin www.selectdatasystems.com - web hosting and database services. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows 98 HDD shared from Samba
The permissions on the mounted directory changes during mount, you have to specify the permissions next to your defaults parameter in /etc/fstab I suggest you put all your users that should have access to this drive into a group, and then put: gid=that group's gid number,umask=002 next to the default parameter See man mount Eirik Thorsnes Gagneet Singh wrote: Hi! I have two hard drives on my machine which I am using as a file server. The first HDD contains the RH Linux 7.2 distribution and the second contains Windows 98, the previous OS that I was using on the machine. I have created a mount in the '/etc/fstab' file and the drives on the second disk are visible over the intranet, when I try to access it on the network. The main problem comes when I have to save anything on that drive. It gives an 'Access Denied' message and I am unable to write anything to this drive. The '/etc/fstab' and '/etc/samba/smb.conf' files are given below: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from LinuxServer (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2002/04/23 20:04:13 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = LACME netbios name = LINUXSERVER server string = Samba Server encrypt passwords = Yes password level = 8 username level = 8 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 domain logons = Yes dns proxy = No wins support = Yes admin users = gagneet create mask = 0765 hosts allow = 192.168.1. printing = lprng [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [gagneet] comment = Gagneet's Account path = /home/gagneet username = gagneet valid users = gagneet read only = No guest ok = Yes hosts allow = 192.168.1.53 hide unreadable = Yes fstype = vfat [wp] comment = Windows Partion Account path = /mnt/wp username = gagneet valid users = gagneet read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes hosts allow = 192.168.1.53 fstype = vfat dos filemode = Yes *** *** LABEL=/ / ext3defaults1 1 LABEL=/boot /boot ext3defaults1 2 none/dev/ptsdevpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 none/proc procdefaults0 0 none/dev/shmtmpfs defaults0 0 /dev/hdb3 swapswapdefaults0 0 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro 0 0 /dev/fd0/mnt/floppy autonoauto,owner,kudzu 0 0 /dev/hdc1 /mnt/wp/drivec vfatdefaults0 0 /dev/hdc5 /mnt/wp/drived vfatdefaults0 0 /dev/hdc6 /mnt/wp/drivee vfatdefaults0 0 Please advice on how to access my Windows drive with writeable permissions. I have given the /mnt/wp folder full permissions with 'chmod 777 /mnt/wp'. Gagneet Singh Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba2.2.1a nmbd couldn't be started at suse(7.0) linux(2.2.16) running on s390 platform
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Li, Lily wrote: I'm trying to install samba on suse linux at s390 platform, I tried three options, none of them works 1) Option1, install samba2.2.1a general release I encountered a problem while running /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd -D, here is the log file for you /usr/local/samba/var/log.nmbd --- [2002/04/26 09:04:17, 0] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:create_subnets(242) create_subnets: No local interfaces ! [2002/04/26 09:04:17, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(835) ERROR: Failed when creating subnet lists. Exiting. --- The system is suse 7.0 linux 2.2.16 on IBM s390 platform, the samba i am using is 2.2.1a general release, there is network interface named iucv0, the output of ifconfig -a is the follwing --- iucv0 Link encap:Serial Line IP inet addr:10.4.30.204 P-t-P:10.0.30.254 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1492 Metric:1 Outfill:1492 Keepalive:1492 RX packets:93067 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:63776 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1 RX packets:219 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:219 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 --- 2) I tried also samba1.9.18p1 for mvs, but get an error at make stage collect2: ld returned 1 exit status 3) Use the build-in smb, which is old 2.0.7 version, the smb.conf is different from 2.2.1, I could start smbd, nmbd, but couldn't see it from my desktop network place. my desktop ip is 10.0.20.201, netmask 255.0.0.0, the linux host ip is 10.4.30.204, netmask is 255.0.0.0, linux is ping'able from desktop. Hello Lily, I've had simular problems setting up a Samba server. I'm also using SuSE Linux 7.0 on a Linux/390 system. Only my link to the rest of the network was thru escon channels. The problem with me was the configuration of the escon link ip parameters. Because it is a point-to-point link the netmask defaulted to 255.255.255.255, which is a broadcast address. Once I changed that it worked. But since your ifconfig seems to contains a correct netmaks I'm a bit stomped. Try asking on the linux-390 maillinglist. You will find more info about this mialinglist here : http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?linux-390 There is also another problem with point-to-point links and Samba. The smb protocols use network broadcasts a lot. And as you will see as you compare the ifconfig of a normal ethernet link and a point-to-point link, you will see that the p-t-p links don't support broadcasts. So if you intend to run Samba on a mainframe and have a network that doesn't contains other SMB services like a WINS and PDC, you will need to run Samba of a image/LPAR that has direct access to a broadcast capable device (ethernet, tokenring). Regards, Tim -- === Tim Verhoeven Linux Open Source Specialist GSM : 0496 / 693 453 + e-business solutions Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] + consulting URL : www.sin.khk.be/~dj/ + Server consolidation === -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem linking with SSL on RedHat 7.2
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Neil Aggarwal wrote: Hello: I am trying to compile sambe with SSL on my RedHat 7.2 machine. Are you sure you want SSL? As I understand, it is useless with windows clients as they don't support it. No idea why it doesn't build, perhaps you should use the openssl packages that came with RH7.2. /Urban -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: Problems with SSL
Please help, I have a problem with samba. When I type smbclient -L localhost i get the message : SSL: Error error setting CA cert location: error: ::lib(0) : func(0) : reaction (0) I use redhat 7.0 and samba 2.0.7. my linux box is connected to 2 Windows 2000 machines. I can access samba shares from Windows client. Please help. I do not have SSL configured anywhere in my smb.conf and I do not intend using it for now. How do I get rid of this? I would like to access window shares from my linux box apparently this SSL problem blocks it. Please help Mike
[Samba] Samba 2.2.3a nmbd failures
We have Samba 2.2.3a running on Solaris 8 serving some 200 users. It's configured as a logon server, and serves logons for Win9x clients. Since upgrading to 2.2.3a, however, we've experienced problems with nmbd. It'll work fine for a couple of days, and will then stop responding to logins; clients just get an error message saying that no server is available to authenticate the logon. Killing the nmbd process and restarting it usually recovers the situation. The nmbd log file (log level 2) doesn't appear to offer much clue; it lists the processing of a logon normally, without mentioning any problems. This is a bit of a show-stopper for us! We also have a test machine running Linux and 2.2.3a, which is set up almost identically except that it uses encrypted passwords and serves logons for a few Win2000 and XP clients; that, however, suffers in the same way - it'll run for a couple of days, and then needs to have nmbd restarted. On both machines the source was built using the following arguments to configure: ./configure --libdir=/etc/samba --mandir=/usr/local/man --localstatedir=/var/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/samba/private --with-lockdir=/var/samba/locks It sounds like there may be some problem with the login code in 2.2.3a. I've seen one other mention of this problem on the list archive, but no others, so I guess it's not that common. Does anyone know if using the CVS version is likely to improve the problem? Thanks, Brian. -- Brian Ruth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Department of Anatomy, University College London. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba-smbpasswd 2 samba-ldap migration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi ignacio, i have only a short question: we have to migrate a samba 2.2.2 with /etc/private/smbpasswd backend to samba 2.2.3a (maybe 2.2.4 if it is released until then :) now the import2_smbpasswd.pl creates no samba_account, but smbPasswordEntrys. so my idea is: migrate the /etc/passwd with the padl migration tools and do than a smbpasswd -a username (for each user). after that, i write a short script (bash, cause i am not so familiar with perl.) and replace all ntPassword and lmPassword entries in the ldapserver. so the only unknow thing to me is: how does the rid-calculation works? after moving the MACHINE.SID from the old server to the new one, everything should work fine again? if the rid's stay the same? are i am correct? greetings thomas - -- # Thomas Stegbauer # Tronicplanet Datendienst GmbH # http://www.keyserver.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xFF837A1A -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE8zQ+yzrK/xv+DehoRArv7AKCpbLAuocm94L5iM6UAt4zW3V3w3wCfZ7WN PINApZRxz70+/6cuWBu9/o4= =OcmV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] DHCP graphical mode?
** Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo são confidenciais e para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organização para o qual foi enviado. Se recebeu este email por engano por favor notifique [EMAIL PROTECTED] Esta nota confirma que esta mensagem foi verificada pelo MIMEsweeper não tendo sido encontrados virus. www.mimesweeper.com *** Hi! Is there some graphical mode to reserve the ip's in dhcp? Thanks! Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] DHCP graphical mode?
** Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo são confidenciais e para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organização para o qual foi enviado. Se recebeu este email por engano por favor notifique [EMAIL PROTECTED] Esta nota confirma que esta mensagem foi verificada pelo MIMEsweeper não tendo sido encontrados virus. www.mimesweeper.com *** Hi! Is there some graphical mode to reserve the ip's in dhcp? (like dhcp manager in windows, for example) Thanks! Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] authorise_login: rejected invalid user nobody
Hi, I'm using samba-2.2.3a and winbind to authenticate against out NT PDC, but for some reason I cannot login ( I used to be able to), but now all I get in the system logs for my machine is: [2002/04/29 10:47:35, 0] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(872) \ authorise_login: rejected invalid user nobody As I mentioned this used to work fine and the other people I setup can log in fine. I came into work this morning and tried to login using samba and ssh, but both bring up this error in the /etc/samba/trinity.log (trinity being my machine's hostname) I don't have a uiser called nobody, as from what I see, if it cannot find me, then it will try to login in with the user nobody's id. running getent passwd and gentent group revels that I'm listed in the groups. Restarting smb and winbind doesn't help either and also a reboot of my workstation doesn't help in this instance. Doing a web search didn't revel much (but that could of been the words I was searching for) - -- Mark Cooke Internet Operations Technician MM Group Ltd Tel: 8141 (Internal) Tel: (0117) 9168141 (External) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mmgroup.co.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Silence is golden
Hello, We now have our samba server up running. But it's on an old machine with an awfully loud harddrive. Pre-samba most of the time the box was idle the harddrive managed to go into standby - thus sparing us from the din. When samba is running (even if no users are accessing shares) there are accesses every 5 mins or so - keeping the drive spinning continuously. I've redirected the log files to /dev/null set log level = 0 syslog only = 0. But it is still happening. Apart from killing syslogd - has anyone any ideas? Cheers, Robin. p.s. i'm not really bothered about logging from samba. i trust it! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Glitch in source/utils/status.c (2.2.3a 2.2.4-pre)
FYI, Non-initialized variable fname in file source/utils/status.c line 649 printf(Opened status file %s\n, fname); I changed the line to: printf(Opened status file %s\n, lock_path(connections.tdb)); But I don't think that's right cuz it outputs: Opened status file /connections.tdb I am not even sure if the status file = connections.tdb, I guess it does... does it? ;) Pierre B. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Silence is golden
Marlow, Robin wrote: Hello, We now have our samba server up running. But it's on an old machine with an awfully loud harddrive. Pre-samba most of the time the box was idle the harddrive managed to go into standby - thus sparing us from the din. When samba is running (even if no users are accessing shares) there are accesses every 5 mins or so - keeping the drive spinning continuously. Your machine is old, what about the harddrive? If it's old too you should keep it running otherwise it might break quite earlier. I've redirected the log files to /dev/null set log level = 0 syslog only = 0. But it is still happening. Apart from killing syslogd - has anyone any ideas? When you stop samba, the drive does go off? I guess you're running Linux... 1- Have you tried to do a strace on your Samba processes to see what they are doing? 2- You can perhaps do a few ls -lu in a few directories, like the locks directory, the logs, etc. The -u shows the last access time on each of your files. You can even cd in the samba directory and do : ls -lRu | grep Apr 29 12 which would show file changed on Apr 29 between 12:00pm and 12:59pm... Depending on your Linux distribution, etc. Files might be hanging around in /var/..., /etc, /everywhere ... By the way, if this is a server ... spend 200$ and get another hard drive, you'll get 80GB at that price ;) Pierre B. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] script to check samba
On Apr. 1st, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another question is: Is there a way to test for a logon using smbclient or similar tool? I'd like to be able to get a job in cron to test whether it's working and alert me before the windows users start to complain. Some time ago I wrote such a tiny script to check our Samba servers: #!/bin/sh # # script to check Samba availiability # Daniel Moeller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), 29. Apr. 2002 # # change these parameters HOST=yourServer USER=user PASSWD=passwd WDOMAIN=Windows-domain MAILADR=[EMAIL PROTECTED] # /usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient -L \\$HOST -U $USER%$PASSWD -W $WDOMAIN /dev/null rc=$? if [ $rc != 0 ]; then /usr/bin/mailx -s Samba on $HOST has problems $MAILADR EOF Attention! Samba-Server on $HOST is not operating properly. User $WDOMAIN\$USER got an error! Mail has been generated by script /usr/local/samba/bin/smbtest on $HOST EOF fi # end If you wish to reply, please eMail me directly, as I'm currently not subscribed to the mailing list. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards / Saludos cordiales Daniel Möller Robert Bosch GmbH SC Operation, QI/EES3 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] DHCP graphical mode?
use: www.webmin.net = a very good linux admin progam. TH Alexandre Miguel Fernandes Mendonça wrote: ** Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo são confidenciais e para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organização para o qual foi enviado. Se recebeu este email por engano por favor notifique [EMAIL PROTECTED] Esta nota confirma que esta mensagem foi verificada pelo MIMEsweeper não tendo sido encontrados virus. www.mimesweeper.com *** Hi! Is there some graphical mode to reserve the ip's in dhcp? (like dhcp manager in windows, for example) Thanks! Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2.2.4-pre - smbclient get NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
I just downloaded the latest SAMBA_2_2 CVS release (at about 3am PST Monday, April 29). I have set it up with domain security and joined the Windows domain. From other windows machines, and even other samba servers (using 2.2.3a) I'm able to connect and authenticate just fine. However, if I execute the following command locally: smbclient -L MYSERVER -U dan_thibadeau -W nt_domain I get the error NT_STATUS_LOGIN_FAILURE. If I run a backup copy of smbclient from version 2.2.3a on the local machine as above it works fine. I don't know if it is related, but in the log file (debug 3) I also notice: [2002/04/29 04:52:30, 2] lib/util_sock.c:(871) error connecting to 15.1.2.3:445 (Invalid argument) [2002/04/29 04:52:30, 3] lib/util_sock.c:(843) Connecting to 15.1.2.3 at port 139 [2002/04/29 04:52:30, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:(406) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD I have full log if needed. I ran it several times. I know I didn't type my password wrong. Dan Thibadeau -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 2.2.4-pre - smbclient get NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, THIBADEAU,DAN (HP-Roseville,ex1) wrote: I just downloaded the latest SAMBA_2_2 CVS release (at about 3am PST Monday, April 29). I have set it up with domain security and joined the Windows domain. From other windows machines, and even other samba servers (using 2.2.3a) I'm able to connect and authenticate just fine. However, if I execute the following command locally: smbclient -L MYSERVER -U dan_thibadeau -W nt_domain I get the error NT_STATUS_LOGIN_FAILURE. If I run a backup copy of smbclient from version 2.2.3a on the local machine as above it works fine. Works fine here. What happens in the smbd log? cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Solaris8(IA)+Samba 2.2.3a+Winbind
Hi, I compiled and installed Samba-2.2.3a on Solaris 8(IA).Now I am trying to configure Winbind to enable logon to our Win2k Domain from the Samba box.I copied the libnss_winbind.so to the /lib folder created .so.1 .so.2 links.I also made changes in the smb.conf file as given below.I am able to connect to the shares on the Samba Server using the Domain authentication.Now I changed the /etc/nsswitch.conf to contain the entries of winbind for passwd group.I could also get all the list of user group names with wbinfo -u -g.But getent passwd doesnt return anything except the local passwd database users.I could complie the pam_winbind.so file with some Incompatible pointer type warnings and placed the pam_winbind.so file in the /usr/lib/security along with an entry in the /etc/pam.conf file .But I couldnt logon to my Solaris box with a domain user name.I examined the log.winbindd file found that the username which is getnag on the domain is being truncated to etnag.Please find my configuration files below..I hope someone will definitely help me. # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!) most of which are not shown in this example # # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you # may wish to enable # # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command testparm # to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors. # #=== Global Settings = [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: REDHAT4 workgroup = SCLINDIA # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field server string = PLUTO # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict # connections to machines which are on your local network. The # following example restricts access to two C class networks and # the loopback interface. For more examples of the syntax see # the smb.conf man page ; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. # If you want to automatically load your printer list rather # than setting them up individually then you'll need this load printers = yes # you may wish to override the location of the printcap file ; printcap name = /etc/printcap # on SystemV system setting printcap name to lpstat should allow # you to automatically obtain a printer list from the SystemV spool # system ; printcap name = lpstat # It should not be necessary to specify the print system type unless # it is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: # bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx ; printing = bsd # Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd # otherwise the user nobody is used ; guest account = pcguest # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). max log size = 50 # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See # security_level.txt for details. security = domain # Use password server option only with security = server # The argument list may include: # password server = My_PDC_Name [My_BDC_Name] [My_Next_BDC_Name] # or to auto-locate the domain controller/s # password server = * password server = SCLPDC # Note: Do NOT use the now deprecated option of domain controller # This option is no longer implemented. # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents encrypt passwords = yes # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name # of the machine that is connecting ; include = /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf.%m # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details # You may want to add the following on a Linux system: # SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 socket options = TCP_NODELAY # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them # here. See the man page for details. ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 # Browser Control Options: # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply ; local master = no # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser # elections. The default value should be reasonable ; os level = 33 # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master
RE: [Samba] Oplock breaks.
Can do.. I'll turn off and report in a week if it helps. Thanks, Eric -Original Message- From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:15 PM To: Pablo Alcaraz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Oplock breaks. I get the impression from this message board that oplocks are a bad idea, overall. They are only really good, they say, for serving static files to clients. I would turn them off unless you have a good reason to use them. Joel On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 11:13:15AM -0300, Pablo Alcaraz wrote: I get this errors too in Samba on Linux kernel 2.4.16 with/without acl of bestbits. The problem is whith clients accessing from wondows 2000 workstation using a Visual Basic 16 bits application to Foxpro 2.5 files. Any Idea? Pablo Ladner, Eric (Eric.Ladner) wrote: Got anohter one [2002/04/26 10:49:36, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(758) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Error 0) oplock_break failed for file budget/2003Budget/RefinerySchedule.pdf (dev = 4005, inode = 60589, file_id = 2168). [2002/04/26 10:49:36, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(843) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. They seem to always come in pairs and result in an error on the client side. The file is not saved. Should I turn off oplocks altogether? -Original Message- *From:* Ladner, Eric (Eric.Ladner) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2002 11:39 AM *To:* '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' *Subject:* [Samba] Oplock breaks. (HP-UX 11.0 - smbd version 2.2.3a) Any idea what causes this: [2002/04/25 07:55:21, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(758) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Error 0) oplock_break failed for file nalco/TMPfpd8cv4jv7.shtml (dev = 4005, inode = 60549, file_id = 2501). [2002/04/25 07:55:21, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(843) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. At the same time, the user got one of those The local device name is already in use messages. We've started seeing a lot of these in the last few weeks or so. Thanks, Eric Ladner Chevron Products Co. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 2.2.4-pre Makefile install issue.
Cool, but the install-sh still does not support multiple paths on the
command line with the -d option. The rest of my last email addressed
that. :)
Bill
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Gerald Carter wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, William Jojo wrote:
Just checked out CVS 2.2.4-pre this morning and noticed that some new
directories under $prefix are being used:
var/run and var/run/samba ?
just fixed about an hour ago. Try again. Sorry.
pid files should stay in ${prefix}/var/locks by default.
You can override this locationwith the pid directory
parameter.
cheers, jerry
-
Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com
SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org
--http://www.plainjoe.org
Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2
--I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Silence is golden
As I recall, samba is supposed to reread the smb.conf every so often, too. Joel On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:24:24AM +0100, Marlow, Robin wrote: Hello, We now have our samba server up running. But it's on an old machine with an awfully loud harddrive. Pre-samba most of the time the box was idle the harddrive managed to go into standby - thus sparing us from the din. When samba is running (even if no users are accessing shares) there are accesses every 5 mins or so - keeping the drive spinning continuously. I've redirected the log files to /dev/null set log level = 0 syslog only = 0. But it is still happening. Apart from killing syslogd - has anyone any ideas? Cheers, Robin. p.s. i'm not really bothered about logging from samba. i trust it! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Error Joining NT Domain w/win2k system
I am running samba 3.0alpha17 as an NT PDC on solaris 2.8. When I attempt to join the domain with a win2k system, I receive the following error msg: The following error occurred attempting to join the domain ENG-2K: There is no user session key for the specified logon session. I am using a valid user ID, with correct password that has permissions to join domain, and have reset the machine account password. Thanks greg -- Greg Flowers Phone: (334)844-2280 === Information Technology Specialist IIMCP 2126883 Network Services, College of Engineering, Auburn University -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and Groups
All, I've just installed and configured a Samba server for the first time. I am trying to make some sense of the way Unix groups are trans- lated to their Windows counterparts. I created two Samba users on the server: root and marc. I set up a Win2000 server and joined it to the Samba domain (WINTEST). I created a share on the Win2000 server and opened the dialog to set permissions. In this dialog, I see the root and marc accounts; I see some built-in groups like Everyone, Authenticated Users, etc.; and, I see several Unix groups: dip, src, shadow, utmp... However, not all Unix groups are shown, and I don't see any rhyme or reason to those that are. I have given no group directives of any kind in the Samba config file. It seems that there should be some sort of group file that satisfies the analogy: group file is to /etc/groups as smbpasswd is to /etc/passwd. In searching on the web, I found some info about a domain group map configuration directive that should be valid for post-2.0.x installations. I've installed version 2.2.3a, and there is no mention in the documentation of this directive. Has it ceased to exist? Thanks in advance for your help. Any advice you can give me is very much appreciated. Marc -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Printing troubles
Do you also have LPRng installed on this box? Did you have to reinstall it? If so, look to see if the links between lpr, lpd, lpc, lprm, etc. in the LPRng install dir (/usr/local/bin, /usr/local/sbin on my OBSD box) and /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. If they weren't, I think you get similar problems. Jim -Original Message- From: Damian Gerow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Printing troubles Our print server (linux 2.2.19, Debian unstable, with the 2.2.3a-6 package) had a bit of trouble yesterday, and after getting everything back up and working, printing is now broken. I can print from the commandline, but not through samba. From a 2000 client, I can see the printer shares, but can't ever actually print to them (Could not start print job.) If I open the server in Network Neighbourhood, and browse the 'Printers' share, I get errors on the samba server (signal 11 in smbd), and can no longer access the server without restarting samba -- Remote Procedure call failed. I can post the logs if need be, as well as the printer config, just wondering if anyone has any ideas beforehand. I did a quick check through the archives, but couldn't find anything. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP connection problem (start-up only)
I can't read your mesage -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] can't set time on nt client for synchro
hello i can't set time on my nt client with my logon.bat script cause they don't have exec privilège that's ok but how i do that ? urgent!! thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Problem linking with SSL on RedHat 7.2
Urban: Are you sure you want SSL? As I understand, it is useless with windows clients as they don't support it. I am sure that we want to use SSL. We want to be able to access our repositories remotely, but do not want to have the data compromised. Regarding the windows clients, they can support it using an stunnel wrapper, which is what we are going to do. No idea why it doesn't build, perhaps you should use the openssl packages that came with RH7.2. Here is what I did: make clean ./configure --with-ssl --with-sslinc=/usr/include/openssl make I still get these messages: Linking bin/smbd smbd/ssl.o: In function `sslutil_init': smbd/ssl.o(.text+0x23f): undefined reference to `SSL_library_init' smbd/ssl.o(.text+0x256): undefined reference to `RAND_egd' smbd/ssl.o(.text+0x3ce): undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file' smbd/ssl.o(.text+0x577): undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_set_tmp_rsa_callback' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1 Any ideas? Thanks, Neil. -- Neil Aggarwal JAMM Consulting, Inc.(972) 612-6056, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com Custom Internet DevelopmentWebsites, Ecommerce, Java, databases -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Delays with windows 2000
Installation: Linux RedHat 6.2, Samba 2.2.3a in windows 2000 domain environment. Authentification is done through winbind. Every time I initially connect to samba share from windows 2000 client, I must wait about three seconds, windows 98 doesn't have this problem. Why does windows 2000 workstation feel this delay? I put windows 2000 workstation in /etc/hosts, but it didn't help. Samba's logs don't show anything weird also. Thanks for any ideas. My smb.conf: [global] workgroup = L.B.S server string = Samba server hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = domain password server = ERGO encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast wins server = 10.0.0.27 winbind separator = + winbind uid = 1-2 winbind gid = 1-2 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes [test] path = /tmp writable = yes public = yes samba was compiled with: --with-fhs \ --with-quotas \ --with-smbmount \ --with-pam \ --with-pam-smbpass \ --with-ufs \ --with-acl-support \ --with-winbind \ --with-utmp \ Egidijus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] can't set time on nt client for synchro
What is the command line you're using to set the time? net time \\samba1 /set /yes works for me... Jim -Original Message- From: root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] can't set time on nt client for synchro hello i can't set time on my nt client with my logon.bat script cause they don't have exec privilège that's ok but how i do that ? urgent!! thanks r [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Printing troubles
Source upgrade - I don't think there's a 2.2.3a package for OpenBSD 3.1 yet; I don't think I've got the expertise to build it for them...;-( Jim -Original Message- From: Damian Gerow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:17 AM To: Van Sickler, Jim Subject: RE: [Samba] Printing troubles At 12:14 PM 4/29/2002, Van Sickler, Jim wrote: I'm going to look into CVS'ing my current 2.2.3a box. I have several oddities that hopefully will be fixed with the updated code. Fingers crossed Are you doing a source upgrade, or building a package? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Engineering Forums
Hi Samba, A quick note to see if you are still interested in joining our free Civil Engineering technical forums. WaterTalk (water supply) StormTalk (stormwater management) Sewertalk (sanitary sewer modeling) Visit: http://www.haestad.com/forums/05 Best Regards, John Haestad President CEO Haestad Methods -- This email intended for [EMAIL PROTECTED] only. Haestad Methods, Inc. provides the highest quality software, textbooks, and continuing education to Civil Engineers and Water Resources Professionals. Our software maps, manages, and models your city water, city sewer, and your roadway and urban drainage systems. When it pours, we reign If you were sent this mail in error, you may remove yourself by responding to this mail with the word remove in the subject line. Haestad Methods +1-203-755-1666 voice +1-203-597-1488 fax 11546-1013683 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with printer sharing using Samba PDC + Printer Server NT
Hello We have one Samba 2.2.3a running as PDC of our domain. There are also a winNT 4 machine used as a Printer Server (we prefer to use another machine to print services). After one printer instalation, on printer server, I try to configure permissions in the Security tab, Permissions button. I click in Add button and the first option appears as a blank line, but I include it anyway. Then, in the field correspondent to the added users, appears my domain name(?!?!). I confirm the inclusion them with Print permission, but in the list of users, instead of the domain name appears Unix_group.35214085 and the users of the domain can´t access the printer shared! I was read anything about the Unix_group. occurs when the smbpasswd file doesn´t match with /etc/passwd file. Is it correct in this case? Are anything to do? Thanks in advance and best regards == Administraçao da Rede FACIN / PUCRS Ramal 4184 Prédio 30 - Sala 145 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Delays with windows 2000
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the Samba docs, but wouldn't you need host to be in the name resolve order for Samba to use hosts, or DNS for name resolution? Since Win2k/XP are DNS/hosts centric OS's that only use WINS/lmhosts for backward compatibility one should be able to have a WINS free network if all the MS OS's are 2k/XP and if Samba can resolve via DNS/hosts (maybe I'm assuming too much on Samba's part). On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 11:53, Egidijus Antanaitis wrote: Installation: Linux RedHat 6.2, Samba 2.2.3a in windows 2000 domain environment. Authentification is done through winbind. Every time I initially connect to samba share from windows 2000 client, I must wait about three seconds, windows 98 doesn't have this problem. Why does windows 2000 workstation feel this delay? I put windows 2000 workstation in /etc/hosts, but it didn't help. Samba's logs don't show anything weird also. Thanks for any ideas. My smb.conf: [global] workgroup = L.B.S server string = Samba server hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = domain password server = ERGO encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast wins server = 10.0.0.27 winbind separator = + winbind uid = 1-2 winbind gid = 1-2 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes [test] path = /tmp writable = yes public = yes samba was compiled with: --with-fhs \ --with-quotas \ --with-smbmount \ --with-pam \ --with-pam-smbpass \ --with-ufs \ --with-acl-support \ --with-winbind \ --with-utmp \ Egidijus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Printing troubles
So much for easy cvs...I'm behind a firewall/proxy. The cvs login goes okay, then aborts with no route to host. Any idea how to make this work? Jim -Original Message- From: Damian Gerow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:17 AM To: Van Sickler, Jim Subject: RE: [Samba] Printing troubles At 12:14 PM 4/29/2002, Van Sickler, Jim wrote: I'm going to look into CVS'ing my current 2.2.3a box. I have several oddities that hopefully will be fixed with the updated code. Fingers crossed Are you doing a source upgrade, or building a package? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Authenticating to a Windows 2000 Server
Hi everyone I am having a problem with Samba 2.2.2 on Solaris 8/SPARC. I have configured Samba and have successfully joined my 2K domain (according to smbpasswd), but I can't authenticate usernames. From the log file, I think the problem is that Samba did not join the domain properly. I haven't had any problems with my RedHat 7.2 setups running the same smb.conf structure and same version of Samba. When I look at the event log on my 2K DC, there is a failed netlogon for the machine that I am trying to run Samba on. I have deleted the computer account from the DC and rejoined the domain, it hasn't helped. Anyone have any ideas? I have included the log output from when I try to conenct to the share from a Windows client. thanks Jeff [2002/04/29 13:18:23, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2002/04/29 13:18:23, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(72) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2002/04/29 13:18:23, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1371) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine OTTDC1. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. [2002/04/29 13:18:23, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1591) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2002/04/29 13:18:23, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:startsmbfilepwent(171) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd. Error was No such file or directory [2002/04/29 13:18:23, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwnam(1368) unable to open passdb database. [2002/04/29 13:18:23, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:startsmbfilepwent(171) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd. Error was No such file or directory [2002/04/29 13:18:23, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwnam(1368) unable to open passdb database. [2002/04/29 13:18:24, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2002/04/29 13:18:24, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(72) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2002/04/29 13:18:24, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1371) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine OTTDC1. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. [2002/04/29 13:18:24, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1591) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Resultados de scaneo de RAV AntiVirus
RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 version: 8.3.2 (snapshot-20020108) Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved. 57 more days to evaluate. Running on host: serviteca.antumalal-automotriz.com - Esta es una copia del encabezado del correo: - El archivo infectado fue guardado en cuarentena con el nombre: 1020099759-dfg3TH2d408740. El Archivo (part0001:general.pif) adjunto al mail (con asunto:Anterior) enviado por [EMAIL PROTECTED] para [EMAIL PROTECTED], esta infectado con el virus: Win32/Klez.H@mm. No puede limpiar este archivo. El archivo a sido eliminado con exito por RAV AntiVirus. -- Resultados de RAV AntiVirus -- Scan engine 8.5 (Standard) for i386. Last update: Mon Apr 29 09:35:15 2002 Scanning for 66313 malwares (viruses, trojans and worms). To get a free 60-days evaluation version of RAV AntiVirus v8 (yet fully functional) please visit: http://www.ravantivirus.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem with printer sharing using Samba PDC + PrinterServer NT
Hi, --On Monday, April 29, 2002 13:47:34 -0300 Luiz Alfredo Baggiotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have one Samba 2.2.3a running as PDC of our domain. There are also a users, instead of the domain name appears Unix_group.35214085 and the I think, that matches the problem I had some time ago. There were some fixes applied to CVS, so try it with the latest snapshot again. cheers, Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Question on samba as PDC and fileserver
For a project I am working on I have to configure a Redhat 7.2 server as the file server and PDC for a small company network of 12 workstations and a couple of network printers. The client was happy to have a Linux server as it will provide IMAP, DNS, and tape backup of the email and home directories. My question is, how well is Samba working as a PDC, how should I configure the network so that Samba authenticates the users and provides name resolution for the Windows machines. Anything else to be aware of, any gotchas? Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] Box 340, The Valley, Anguilla, British West Indies Tel: 264 497 5670 Fax: 264 497 8463 Take a virtual tour of the island http://www.anguillaguide.com/ The Anguilla Guide Find your perfect rental villa www.mycaribbean.com Talk to me in real time: MSN Instant Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 118159388 Yahoo:netconcepts_anguilla US Fax and Voicemail: (605)253-1759 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] About samba printing...
Hello ... I hope this is not the wrong list to place this question. Excuse me for that. We have a server running Linux RH 7.2. Now, is there any kind of advice about how to print to windows shared printers? A few months ago, we configured this issue using the print manager, but due to a problem with disks, we have had to reinstall the OS. As soon as it finished the install proccess, we defined the printers as in the first time (even the windows shared ones) but here we have problems. Trying with the text page test does nothing. Postcript, nothing. It does not print. No errors, no messages, it works as normal but the printers do not receive the job. May be a bug? Thanks in advance for your comments ... -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS/E d+(++) s: a C+++ UCL*+++$ P L+++$ E--- W+++$ N++ o K++ w$ O- M- V- PS+ PE Y PGP t 5 X+ R* tv+ b++ DI--- D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- smime.p7s Description: application/pkcs7-signature
Re: [Samba] Prints ok, but says Access denied, unable to connect. win2k and samba 2.2.1a
Randy, You will need to add use client driver = yes to the smb.conf file, or install the printer drivers so the W2K workstations can download the driver from the sever. Hope this helps. Jay I have a small Samba 2.2.1a plus Win2k workgroup. Samba is running on Redhat 7.2. There is a networked laserjet 5000 using a static IP which I can print to successfuly from the linux box, and from the win2k workstations via the queue on the linux box. The weird thing is that, on the win2k worksations, if I double click on the printer icon the status of the printer is reported as Access denied, unable to connect. Yet it works??? Any ideas. Here's part of the smb.conf: [public] path = /usr/local/share/public public = yes only guest = yes writable = yes printable = no [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes valid users = %S create mode = 0664 directory mode = 0775 # If you want users samba doesn't recognize to be mapped to a guest user map to guest = bad user # A restricted directory for accounting files. [accounting] comment = Accounting Share path = /usr/local/share/accounting valid users = kferrone,rliu,ldelvecchio public = no writable = yes printable = no # A administrative logon for backups [private] comment = SFB Private Directories path = /home valid users = jbailey public = no writable = no printable =no browseable=no # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = yes valid users = %S # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = yes writable = no printable = yes public = yes snip Thanks for any suggestions you may have. /R __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Prints ok, but says Access denied, unable to connect. win2k and samba 2.2.1a
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy, You will need to add use client driver = yes to the smb.conf file, or install. I added 'use client driver = yes ' to the printers section of smb.conf. It didn't seem to help. Any other ideas? /R __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Prints ok, but says Access denied, unable to connect .win2k and samba 2.2.1a
see smb.conf(5), and disable spoolss=yes Jim -Original Message- From: Randy S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Prints ok, but says Access denied, unable to connect. win2k and samba 2.2.1a --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy, You will need to add use client driver = yes to the smb.conf file, or install. I added 'use client driver = yes ' to the printers section of smb.conf. It didn't seem to help. Any other ideas? /R __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba and NT 4.0
My netbios name is the samba server name, and it is the same as the dns name for this machine. Joel On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 04:32:13PM -0700, Keith wrote: Is your netbios name the samba server name or your windows client name? Keith Kasin www.selectdatasystems.com - web hosting and database services. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] WinXP slow share access
My WinXP clients are able to map a network drive on my samba server. However, it takes 30 seconds to do so, and accessing the contents of the shared drive is also quite slow. Linux (smbclient) and Windows 2000 clients are able to map the share instantly, and access files without delay. I am using Linux 2.4.5, with samba 2.2.3a compiled from source on the server. The delay is consistent at 30 seconds, and occurs just after the authentication protocol is negotiated. Authentication succeeds after a 30 second delay. I use this command line on the windows clients (both 2000 and XP use the same command): net use * \\demeter\jamesn /user:jamesn The NetBIOS name Demeter resolves correctly and instantly to 192.168.0.77 on any machine (I've added a static mapping in the WINS server). The negotiated protocol is NT LM 0.12 - I've tried restricting this to LANMAN1, but the 30 second delay still occurs at the same spot. I've included my smb.conf below, as well as part of a level 3 log showing when the timeout occurs. I would appreciate any help that you can give me on this. I have no idea what changed from Windows 2000 to Windows XP to cause this problem. Smb.conf: [global] log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd log level = 10 workgroup = ARIES interfaces = 192.168.0.0/24 lo bind interfaces only = Yes encrypt passwords = Yes socket address = 192.168.0.77 guest account = security = user wins server = 192.168.0.167 name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast [homes] read only = No hide dot files = No create mask = 0644 invalid users = root Level 3 log: [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(432) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(860) Transaction 2 of length 197 [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(667) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 31398) [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(314) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(848) Domain=[ARIES] NativeOS=[Windows 2002 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(858) sesssetupX:name=[jamesn] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] WinXP slow share access
Would you consider running tcpdump on the linux server to watch the interaction? I haven't noticed a slow access problem with XPpro, but I don't use authenticatation (security=share and guest=ftp and guest ok = yes) Joel On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 04:30:00PM -0500, James Northcott wrote: My WinXP clients are able to map a network drive on my samba server. However, it takes 30 seconds to do so, and accessing the contents of the shared drive is also quite slow. Linux (smbclient) and Windows 2000 clients are able to map the share instantly, and access files without delay. I am using Linux 2.4.5, with samba 2.2.3a compiled from source on the server. The delay is consistent at 30 seconds, and occurs just after the authentication protocol is negotiated. Authentication succeeds after a 30 second delay. I use this command line on the windows clients (both 2000 and XP use the same command): net use * \\demeter\jamesn /user:jamesn The NetBIOS name Demeter resolves correctly and instantly to 192.168.0.77 on any machine (I've added a static mapping in the WINS server). The negotiated protocol is NT LM 0.12 - I've tried restricting this to LANMAN1, but the 30 second delay still occurs at the same spot. I've included my smb.conf below, as well as part of a level 3 log showing when the timeout occurs. I would appreciate any help that you can give me on this. I have no idea what changed from Windows 2000 to Windows XP to cause this problem. Smb.conf: [global] log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd log level = 10 workgroup = ARIES interfaces = 192.168.0.0/24 lo bind interfaces only = Yes encrypt passwords = Yes socket address = 192.168.0.77 guest account = security = user wins server = 192.168.0.167 name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast [homes] read only = No hide dot files = No create mask = 0644 invalid users = root Level 3 log: [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2002/04/29 13:37:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(432) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(860) Transaction 2 of length 197 [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(667) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 31398) [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(314) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(848) Domain=[ARIES] NativeOS=[Windows 2002 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] [2002/04/29 13:38:25, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(858) sesssetupX:name=[jamesn] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Question on samba as PDC and fileserver
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 16:09, Chris Mason wrote: For a project I am working on I have to configure a Redhat 7.2 server as the file server and PDC for a small company network of 12 workstations and a couple of network printers. The client was happy to have a Linux server as it will provide IMAP, DNS, and tape backup of the email and home directories. My question is, how well is Samba working as a PDC, it works great - it's just missing the domain groups in 2.2.3a how should I configure the network so that Samba authenticates the users add the users to the unix machine and to smbpasswd (see the howto collection) and provides name resolution for the Windows machines. Just enable wins support, and feed it to the clients in your dhcp configuration. Anything else to be aware of, any gotchas? follow the howto and you should be fine - if the clients are XP or W2Ksp2 learn about the signorseal reg change. brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Resultados de scaneo de RAV AntiVirus
RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 version: 8.3.2 (snapshot-20020108) Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved. 57 more days to evaluate. Running on host: serviteca.antumalal-automotriz.com - Esta es una copia del encabezado del correo: - El archivo infectado fue guardado en cuarentena con el nombre: 1020115423-dfg3TLNg414056. El Archivo (part0001:Cable.scr) adjunto al mail (con asunto:A very good tool) enviado por [EMAIL PROTECTED] para [EMAIL PROTECTED], esta infectado con el virus: Win32/Klez.H@mm. No puede limpiar este archivo. El archivo a sido eliminado con exito por RAV AntiVirus. -- Resultados de RAV AntiVirus -- Scan engine 8.5 (Standard) for i386. Last update: Mon Apr 29 09:35:15 2002 Scanning for 66313 malwares (viruses, trojans and worms). To get a free 60-days evaluation version of RAV AntiVirus v8 (yet fully functional) please visit: http://www.ravantivirus.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Resultados de scaneo de RAV AntiVirus
RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 version: 8.3.2 (snapshot-20020108) Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved. 57 more days to evaluate. Running on host: serviteca.antumalal-automotriz.com - Esta es una copia del encabezado del correo: - El archivo infectado fue guardado en cuarentena con el nombre: 1020115425-dfg3TLNi414139. El Archivo (part0001:Redes-En-Linux-Como-9.pif) adjunto al mail (con asunto:Anterior) enviado por [EMAIL PROTECTED] para [EMAIL PROTECTED], esta infectado con el virus: Win32/Klez.H@mm. No puede limpiar este archivo. El archivo a sido eliminado con exito por RAV AntiVirus. -- Resultados de RAV AntiVirus -- Scan engine 8.5 (Standard) for i386. Last update: Mon Apr 29 09:35:15 2002 Scanning for 66313 malwares (viruses, trojans and worms). To get a free 60-days evaluation version of RAV AntiVirus v8 (yet fully functional) please visit: http://www.ravantivirus.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba problem
Hello, I'm new to Samba and just trying version 2.0.6 on Red Hat 6.2 system. After I tried to change password for a user using command smbpasswd, I got the message machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password change: Error was : The specified password is invalid. Failed to change password for username. Everything seems working alright except this particular issue. I would appreciate any suggestion, please help me out. Thank you, Greg attachment: winmail.dat
[Samba] OT Printer
I had installed RH Linux 7.2 on a machine as Custom, and I chose individual packages. When I added a printer, and tried to print it using lpr, it complains cannot open connection to localhost - connection timed out. I installed RH 7.2 on a second machine, which I chose install all packages. This time, I had no problem installing a printer, and printing it using lpr. Checking package dependency reveals that both systems have similar packages installed. Does anyone have any other dependencies, or recommendation about this ?? Thanks a lot -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.3a nmbd failures
Since upgrading to 2.2.3a, however, we've experienced problems with nmbd. It'll work fine for a couple of days, and will then stop responding to logins; clients just get an error message saying that no server is available to authenticate the logon. Killing the nmbd process and restarting it usually recovers the situation. The nmbd log file (log level 2) doesn't appear to offer much clue; it lists the processing of a logon normally, without mentioning any problems. This is most likely fixed in CVS (I saw a patch about WINS registration on this list) I had this same problem for quite a while, and found that the WINS entry for the samba PDC was being removed. To get around the problem without patching, I suggest you edit /etc/hosts and add an entry for the netbios name of your PDC and it's network address. I found that my system had PDC set to 127.0.0.1, which told the clients to try to authenticate to themselves, which what was failing. Regards, Josh Marshall. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] VPN+2.2.3a+LDAP
Hi, I'm after some clarification on a concept I'm toying with, the big question being is it feasible to do this, and are there any things I ought to consider. What I'm after is domain authentication across a multi-subnet VPN. I figured there are three ways of doing this, based on my limited knowledge of Samba (version 2.2.3a): 1. Have a single Samba PDC to control the entire VPN (up to 10 remote sites) using a single LDAP server to authenticate users. 2. Have a Samba server at each site as some sort of pseudo-BDC, all authenticating with a single LDAP server. 3. Have a Samba PDC at each site controlling a domain of its own, but all using the same LDAP server. One requirement I have is that I don't want WAN bandwidth saturating with home directories and user profiles needing to be transmitted across the WAN so I want them stored local to each site, and I think this is possible with Samba and LDAP (is it?). Is this 'shared password server' concept possible with Samba and LDAP? Any URLs or other resources would be great, and I appreciate any help or comments. Please dont tell me to create a trust relationship with Mr Gates. :-) Regards, Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
À̸ÞÀϸ¶ÄÉÆà ÀÌÁ¨ µ·¾ÈµéÀÌ°í È«º¸ÇÑ´Ù [±¤°í]
Title: E-mail±¤°í°¡ ÁÖ´Â È¿°ú Æø¹ßÀûÀÎ E-mail ±¤°í È¿°ú E-mail ±¤°í´Â °³Àλç¾÷À̳ª ¼Ò±Ô¸ð »çÀÌÆ®¿î¿µÀڵ鿡°Ô ºÒȲÀ»µú°í È°·Î¸¦ÅÍÁÖ´Â ¸¶ÄÏÆÃÀ¸·Î ÃÖ»óÀÇÈ¿°ú¸¦ º¸´Â°ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ½À´Ï´Ù. e-mailÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¸¶ÄÉÆÿ¡´Â ´Ü¼ø±¤°í, ȨÆäÀÌÁö ¹æ¹®À¯µµ , ¼³¹®Á¶»ç, ÆǸű¤°íµî ±¤°íÁÖÀÇ ¿ä±¸¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇüÅÂ¿Í ¸ñÀûÀÌ ÀÖÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÎÅͳݹè³Ê±¤°í ¹× ¿ìÆí¹°±¤°í¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ÃÖ¼Ò 10¹è¿¡¼ ÃÖ´ë 30¹è ÀÌ»óÀÇ ³ôÀº ±¤°íÈ¿°ú ÀÔÁõ! À̸ÞÀÏ ¸¶ÄÉÆÿ¡¼ °¡ÀåÁß¿äÇÑ °ÍÀº Á¤È®ÇÑ À̸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼Ò¿Í À̸ÞÀϹ߼۱⠱׸®°í ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎÀÚ °ü¸®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. -¸ÞÀÏ 2100¸¸°³ (Áߺ¹Á¦°ÅµÈ ¾çÁúÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏ Á¤È®ÇÑ°¹¼ö 21,087,471 °³) -´ë·®¸ÞÀÏ ¹ß¼Û±â (ÃÊ°í¼Ó) -ÆÄÀÏ ºÐÇÒ±â (¼ö¹é¸¸°³·Î ¹¿©Áø À̸ÞÀϵµ ´Ü¸îÃʸ¸¿¡ ¿øÇϴ¼ö·Î ³ª´²ÁÜ) Àå½Ã°£ ¿øÇϴ¼ö·®¸¸Å ¹ß¼Û±â·Î ÀÚ¸£´Ï¶ó°í °í»ý¸¹¾ÒÁÒ? ÀÌÁ¨ ±×·±°í»ýÀº ³¡. ÀÌ»ó¸ðµÎ 5¸¸¿ø ¿¡ µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ´Ü ¸î½Ã°£À̸é È¿°ú¸¦º¸´Â À̸ÞÀϸ¶ÄÉÆÃÀ¸·Î ±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¼º°øÀ» º¸ÀåÇÕ´Ï´Ù. [EMAIL PROTECTED] À¸·Î ¹®Àǹٶø´Ï´Ù.-¸ÞÀÏ ÁֽǶ§ ¿¬¶ôó/¼ºÇÔ/ȸ»ç-±âÀç ¿ä¸Á * ºÒ°ÇÀüÇÑ¿ëµµ (Æ÷¸£³ë»çÀÌÆ®, À½¶õ»çÀÌÆ®, ÇǶó¹Ìµå, µ·¹ú±â»çÀÌÆ®, Çà¿îÀÇÆíÁöµî..) À¸·Î »ç¿ëÇϽ÷Á´ÂºÐµé¿¡°Ô´Â µ¥ÀÌŸ¸¦ µå¸®Áö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù. Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸ÁÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü¿¡ ÀǰŠǥ½ÃÀ̸ÞÀÏÀº À̸áÈ«º¸¿¡ °ü½ÉÀִºе鲲 ´ÜÇѹø¸¸ º¸³»´Â ¸ÞÀÏ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.°ü½ÉÀÌ ¾øÀ¸¼Ì´Ù¸é Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ´ÔÀÇ À̸ÞÀÏÀº °ø°³µÈ °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼ ÃßÃâÇÑ °ÍÀ̸ç À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ÀÌ¿Ü¿¡ ´Ù¸¥ Á¤º¸´Â °®±¸ ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å °ÅºÎ¸¦ º¸³»ÁÖ½Ã¸é ¸ÞÀÏ ¸®½ºÆ®¿¡¼ »èÁ¦ÇÏ°Ú½À´Ï´Ù. [¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ] If you are foreigner, please clickhere[Remove] This site is related with E-Mail Marketing.. Your e-mail address is extracted from BBS, and have no other data..Only Have e-mail-address.We appologizing you very much if you received this mail¡¹ Very sorry to disturb you.
Re: [Samba] 2.2.4-pre Makefile install issue.
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, William Jojo wrote: Cool, but the install-sh still does not support multiple paths on the command line with the -d option. The rest of my last email addressed that. :) Ooops. Sorry. I'll take a look. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
RE: PATCH: VFS audit.c module
Title: RE: PATCH: VFS audit.c module
Wouldn't a better fix be to replace the NULLs in vfs.c with calls to a function like vfs_do_nothing, which always returns false or NULL? That way no one working on code outside of the vfs wrapper code has to remember to test the function pointers.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Lorimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 5:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PATCH: VFS audit.c module
Hello,
Not sure if anyone else has run across the same thing: after making and installing the stock audit.so module, trying to write a file to the share causes a segfault. The problem is these lines from smbd/vfs.c:
struct vfs_ops default_vfs_ops = {
...
#if defined(HAVE_NO_ACLS)
NULL,
NULL,
#else
vfswrap_chmod_acl,
vfswrap_fchmod_acl,
#endif
...
};
if HAVE_NO_ACLS is defined, the two pointers are null, and the audit.c module tries to follow the null pointers and causes the segfault. I would guess the problem is also present in skel.c as well. Though the fix is trivial, I've included a patch anyway.
- Eric Lorimer
--- audit.c Sat Apr 27 17:11:25 2002
+++ /tmp/audit.c.good Sat Apr 27 16:44:15 2002
@@ -287,7 +287,12 @@
int audit_chmod_acl(struct connection_struct *conn, const char *path, mode_t mode)
{
- int result = default_vfs_ops.chmod_acl(conn, path, mode);
+ int result;
+
+ if ( default_vfs_ops.chmod_acl == NULL )
+ return 0;
+
+ result = default_vfs_ops.chmod_acl(conn, path, mode);
syslog(SYSLOG_PRIORITY, chmod_acl %s mode 0x%x %s%s\n,
path, mode,
@@ -311,7 +316,12 @@
int audit_fchmod_acl(struct files_struct *fsp, int fd, mode_t mode)
{
- int result = default_vfs_ops.fchmod_acl(fsp, fd, mode);
+ int result;
+
+ if ( default_vfs_ops.fchmod_acl == NULL )
+ return 0;
+
+ result = default_vfs_ops.fchmod_acl(fsp, fd, mode);
syslog(SYSLOG_PRIORITY, fchmod_acl %s mode 0x%x %s%s\n,
fsp-fsp_name, mode,
2..2.4-pre Makefile inconsistencies - Fix enclosed
Repeated makes on Linux result in libnss_winbind.so being rebuilt _every_ time in spite of no changes. Problem is inconsistency between targets and commands. Patches to configure.in and Makefile.in are as follows: --- ../source/configure.in Mon Apr 29 07:16:35 2002 +++ ./configure.in Mon Apr 29 09:32:29 2002 -2674,10 +2674,10 WINBIND_STARGETS=bin/winbindd case $host_os in *irix*) - WINBIND_LTARGETS=libns_winbind.so + WINBIND_LTARGETS=nsswitch/libns_winbind.so ;; *) - WINBIND_LTARGETS=libnss_winbind.so + WINBIND_LTARGETS=nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so ;; esac --- ../source/Makefile.in Mon Apr 29 07:15:48 2002 +++ ./Makefile.in Mon Apr 29 09:37:02 2002 -663,7 +663,7 WINBIND_LTARGETS: $(WINBIND_NSS_PICOBJS) echo Linking $ - $(SHLD) LDSHFLAGS -o nsswitch/$ $(WINBIND_NSS_PICOBJS) WINBIND_NSS_EXTRA_LIBS + $(SHLD) LDSHFLAGS -o $ $(WINBIND_NSS_PICOBJS) WINBIND_NSS_EXTRA_LIBS nsswitch/pam_winbind.so: $(PAM_WINBIND_OBJ) bin/.dummy echo Linking $ Please run autoconf and check in the resulting configure file as well. Rich Bollinger, Elliott Company
PATCH: safe recursion in smbclient
This patch adds a saferecurse option to smbclient which hashes directory
contents to check for infinite recursion, similar to wget. It was
written to require minimal changes to client.c and its behavior while
still preventing infinite recursion. It doesn't change the default
behavior of smbclient, and plays well with the normal recurse option.
This fixes a problem with those who want to retrieve file lists off of
servers where circular file systems may or do exist (in either windows
or *nix). This is useful if someone either desires a circular file
system on a share or if they have little/no control over the file
structure of the server.
I have tested it with directories containing 30,000+ files and saw less
than a second of performance loss versus normal recursion, so I believe
this is a worthwhile tradeoff. Please accept this patch, it will solve
many problems. I submit that the regular unsafe recursion option should
be removed (or renamed to unsaferecurse and this to recurse) but this
patch allows both to be available and only adds saferecurse, changing no
behavior otherwise, since I realize others may disagree.
This is a patch against 2.2.3a but I've checked in cvs and it should
work with any revision after that as well since not much has changed.
Thank you.
Justin Yackoski
--- client/client.c Sat Feb 2 19:46:38 2002
+++ client/client.c Fri Feb 8 18:28:06 2002
-79,6 +79,10
int printmode = 1;
static BOOL recurse = False;
+static BOOL saferecurse = False;
+static hash_table saferecurse_hash_table;
+static int dirs_added = 0;
+char dummy_value[] = a;
BOOL lowercase = False;
struct in_addr dest_ip;
-346,14 +350,97
}
static BOOL do_list_recurse;
+static BOOL do_list_saferecurse;
static BOOL do_list_dirs;
static char *do_list_queue = 0;
static long do_list_queue_size = 0;
static long do_list_queue_start = 0;
static long do_list_queue_end = 0;
+static char *saferecurse_current_dir = 0;
+static long saferecurse_current_dir_size = 0;
+static long saferecurse_current_dir_end = 0;
+static long saferecurse_current_dir_start = 0;
static void (*do_list_fn)(file_info *);
/
+functions for saferecurse_current_dir
+ /
+
+/*
+ * saferecurse_current_dir is a string with the name, size, and mtime of
+ * all files and directories in the current directory, which will later
+ * be hashed if saferecurse is being used
+ */
+static void reset_saferecurse_hash_table( void )
+{
+ static BOOL initialised;
+ if (initialised) {
+ hash_clear(saferecurse_hash_table);
+ }
+
+ initialised = hash_table_init( saferecurse_hash_table, 512,
+ (compare_function)(strcmp));
+}
+
+static void reset_saferecurse_current_dir(void)
+{
+ SAFE_FREE(saferecurse_current_dir);
+ saferecurse_current_dir = 0;
+ saferecurse_current_dir_size = 0;
+ saferecurse_current_dir_start = 0;
+ saferecurse_current_dir_end = 0;
+}
+
+static void init_saferecurse_current_dir(void)
+{
+ reset_saferecurse_current_dir();
+ saferecurse_current_dir_size = 1024;
+ saferecurse_current_dir = malloc(saferecurse_current_dir_size);
+ if (saferecurse_current_dir == 0) {
+ DEBUG(0,(malloc fail for size %d\n,
+(int)saferecurse_current_dir_size));
+ reset_saferecurse_current_dir();
+ } else {
+ memset(saferecurse_current_dir, 0,
+saferecurse_current_dir_size);
+ }
+}
+
+static void add_saferecurse_current_dir(const char* entry)
+{
+ char *dlq;
+
+ long new_end = saferecurse_current_dir_end + ((long)strlen(entry)) + 1;
+ while (new_end saferecurse_current_dir_size)
+ {
+ saferecurse_current_dir_size *= 2;
+ DEBUG(4,(enlarging saferecurse_current_dir to %d\n,
+(int)saferecurse_current_dir_size));
+ dlq = Realloc(saferecurse_current_dir,
+saferecurse_current_dir_size);
+ if (!dlq) {
+ DEBUG(0,(failure enlarging saferecurse_current_dir to %d
+bytes\n,
+ (int)saferecurse_current_dir_size));
+ reset_saferecurse_current_dir();
+ } else {
+ saferecurse_current_dir = dlq;
+ memset(saferecurse_current_dir +
+saferecurse_current_dir_size / 2,
+ 0, saferecurse_current_dir_size / 2);
+ }
+ }
+ if (saferecurse_current_dir)
+ {
+ pstrcpy(saferecurse_current_dir + saferecurse_current_dir_end,
+entry);
+ saferecurse_current_dir_end = new_end;
+ DEBUG(4,(added %s to
client problems?
Howdy all, My problem is this: We are about to deploy some linux Workstations and we want to mount the users NT domain home directory. I am able to access the server from the smb client and view the home directories, but when I cd into my home directory it is empty. I can view them from a net use. Are my domain credentials not being passed? any help would be great ~Michael
overriding dyn_CONFIGFILE in pdbedit with command line parameter
I decided to modify pdbedit to handle another
command line parameter -c /pathto/smb.conf
I've got that working - but I'm not sure it's safe
Is it reasonable to expect the popt stuff to give me back
null terminated string?
if so then find a simple patch below
are attachments not accepted by the listserver - i sent this twice
before but never saw anything on the list
brad
diff -r1.43 pdbedit.c
411a412
static char *configfile = NULL;
433a435
{configfile, c,POPT_ARG_STRING,configfile,0,use the
given path to the smb.conf file,NULL},
441a444,451
pc = poptGetContext(NULL, argc, (const char **) argv,
long_options,
POPT_CONTEXT_KEEP_FIRST);
while((opt = poptGetNextOpt(pc)) != -1);
if (configfile) {
safe_strcpy(dyn_CONFIGFILE,configfile, strlen(configfile));
/*override the default config file*/
}
450,451d459
pc = poptGetContext(NULL, argc, (const char **) argv,
long_options,
POPT_CONTEXT_KEEP_FIRST);
453d460
while((opt = poptGetNextOpt(pc)) != -1);
Re: overriding dyn_CONFIGFILE in pdbedit with command line parameter
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:00:32PM -0400, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote: I decided to modify pdbedit to handle another command line parameter -c /pathto/smb.conf I've got that working - but I'm not sure it's safe Is it reasonable to expect the popt stuff to give me back null terminated string? Can you resend as a diff -u? As to null termination, I think that is safe. Andrew Bartlett
RE: 2.0.6 Problem
That is exciting news, since it is totally undocumented that SAMBA 2.0.3 on OpenVMS supports encrypted passwords. Could you please explain how we can utilize this capability in v2.0.3? Sincerely, Robert F. Thomas A. S. Thomas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:40 PM To: Robert F. Thomas Cc: Naveed Ahmed; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2.0.6 Problem On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Robert F. Thomas wrote: Has the user been entered into the SAMBA password list? In V2.0.3 all passwords are unencrypted. In V2.0.6 passwords can be encrypted and if this feature is being used (turned on by default), each user/machine accessing the share must have an entry in the SAMBA password file. This file is maintained by SMBPASSWD. Sorry, this is incorrect. 1. 2.0.3 allowed encrypted passwds, and you have to do things explicitely to allow them in 2.0.3, 2.0.6, or indeed, any version of Samba. 2. You only get that message if the user has authenticated and tries to do a TCON or a TCONX. Thus, they have clearly authenticated. Use the source, Luke :-) Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2.0.6 Problem
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote: On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Robert F. Thomas wrote: That is exciting news, since it is totally undocumented that SAMBA 2.0.3 on OpenVMS supports encrypted passwords. Oops. I may have miss-spoke with respect to Samba on 2.0.3. I don't use it. In which case, I apologise. The statement is true in general of Samba. Arrrg. That should have read ... Samba 2.0.3 on VMS ... In any event, the error that is being returned clearly indicates that the user has managed to authenticate. You get a different error if they did not authenticate. Could you please explain how we can utilize this capability in v2.0.3? Sincerely, Robert F. Thomas A. S. Thomas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:40 PM To: Robert F. Thomas Cc: Naveed Ahmed; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2.0.6 Problem On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Robert F. Thomas wrote: Has the user been entered into the SAMBA password list? In V2.0.3 all passwords are unencrypted. In V2.0.6 passwords can be encrypted and if this feature is being used (turned on by default), each user/machine accessing the share must have an entry in the SAMBA password file. This file is maintained by SMBPASSWD. Sorry, this is incorrect. 1. 2.0.3 allowed encrypted passwds, and you have to do things explicitely to allow them in 2.0.3, 2.0.6, or indeed, any version of Samba. 2. You only get that message if the user has authenticated and tries to do a TCON or a TCONX. Thus, they have clearly authenticated. Use the source, Luke :-) Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
