Re: [Samba] patch to configure.in for Solaris/gcc (-KPIC vs. -fPIC)
Hello Gerald, Sometimes this may seem to you as a stupid question, but I'm helpless. I used patchadd and patch commands on Solaris to add these 2 patches you have given without any luck. I also reckon that these shouldn't be Solaris patches cos they don't have the basecode and the revision that Solaris patches should have.Pls tell me how to add them and tell me how Autoconf comes in to the picture. I'm installing this on a Solaris 2.6 on SPARC. Please give me a hint Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba does not work over masquerade
> > Its not a samba problem. NetbiosDGM needs to be proxies. If you can > > use ipfilter, look at the netbios proxy. I believe port 137 needs to > > be proxied as well. The netbiosdgm proxy in ipfilter changes part of > > the payload in the netbios dgm packet to work with NAT. > > I am not sure what you are talking about. This is well beyond > my current understanding. > > I am running a freshly-installed RedHat 7.3 distribution. > > Are there instructions on setting this up on a RedHat 7.3 machine? > There may be, but I don't run linux so I don't know if there are for redhat. If you are just talking about share level access then that work's over NAT. Logging on to a domain is where the problem is. You logon, but the windows client gets confused due to payload in the packet. Its a pretty complex issue unless you're someone who understands the netbios protocol. I started reading RFC 1001 and 1002. There may be easier ways or you may not be trying to do what I think you're doing, so hopefully someone else can help you better than I can. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Quickbooks
A little off topic here, but you guys should really learn how to quote a posted message. This quickbooks topic is certainly something that I'm interested in, but it's very difficult to follow the discussion when every follow up message contains the entire conversation from previous posts, superceded by greater than signs. -- Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383fax 541-683-8144 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] vfs audit broken ?
hi i'm trying to use the audit module with samba 2.2.4, while the recycle bin module works (with the patch from Scot Hetzel) the audit module doesn't. i even don't get the "VFS_INIT: vfs_ops loaded". isn't it possible to use more than one vfs module ? and yes i set up syslogd correctly... btw, it's not needed to use '\n' with syslog() -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Quickbooks
> From: Seth Hollen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Karl Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba + Quickbooks > Date: 10 May 2002 22:58:14 -0400 > > just as a note, I have quickbooks on a samba share and have had no file > corruption, a few mysterious file permission problems but nothing > serious.the files are not that large however.I am considering proposing > a linux/samba replacement to an accounting firm and this is something to > be aware of, thanks! > > Seth > > > > On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 20:39, Karl Schmidt wrote: > > This is set up with Win2K boxes sharing a QB file on a SAMBA share. It may > > be quite different than with 95-98x-ME(Miserable Edition). > > > > There are two or more problems - one thing I identified is that it is > > possible for two computers to connect to the QB(QuickBooks) share using the > > same quick books logon - something that will cause data corruption. > > (Something that could have been easily addressed in the QB software too -- > > can't wait till GNUcash does invoices). > > > > The smb.conf that follows seems to have fixed this problem > > > > The other problem only starts after the file size reaches the magic > > 16777216 byte file size - after that size sharing a QB file on SAMBA seems > > to cause corruption on it's own. > > > > After a talking with several folks at Intuit - - (and being told twice that > > running off a Linux server was not problem) I found a brighter tech who > > told me that they don't support linux as a server and they have notes > > showing that they know about the file corruption problems that they can't > > show us. They don't think there is a work-around, but then I think they are > > probably wrong. > > > > I have added > > > > oplocks = no > > strict locking = yes > > > > To the share definition. And will know if it works in a while. > > > > If this gets to Andrew Trigell's attention, let him know that I will supply > > him with QB software to test this out if he needs it - all he has to do is ask. > > > > The files and directories belong to accounting.accounting the permissions > > are set to 770 > > > > > > NO guarantee if this works - It will take some weeks of just using it to > > see if I have it fixed - in the mean time I'm dong lots of verifydata and > > backing up several times/ day. > > > > Any feed back here will be more than welcome > > > > smb.conf follows: > > > > > > #=== Global Base parameters === > > [global] > > netbios name = servername > > workgroup = workgroup > > server string = AMD800mHz 200mHz SFB 376MB RAM > > level2 oplocks=yes > > # Global logging == > > log level = 2 > > syslog = 0 > > max log size = 2000 > > > > #== Global security issues = > > encrypt passwords = yes > > smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd > > #unix password sync = Yes > > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > > passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n > > *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* > > #unix password sync=yes > > hosts allow = 192.168.1. > > security = user > > > > # Global tunning parameters === > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY > > #dead time = 15 > > > > #= Global printer params > > printcap name = /etc/printcap > > load printers = yes > > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > > > > #= Global Browser Control Options > > domain master = yes > > password server = * > > local master = yes > > os level = 67 > > preferred master = yes > > > > # Global Wins parameters === > > wins support = yes > > name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast > > > > # Share Definitions == > > [homes] > > writable = yes > > browsable = no > > > > [accounting] > > browseable=yes > > comment = /home/accounting Quick books share directory > > path = /home/accounting > > oplocks = no > > strict locking = yes > > writable = yes > > create mask = 770 > > directory mask=770 > > force group = accounting > > > > valid users = norma, karl, malaysia > > > > # the above users all belong to the accounting group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Karl Schmidt EMail[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Transtronics, Inc.WEB http://xtronics.com > > 3209 West 9th Street Ph(785) 841-3089 > > Lawrence, KS 66049FAX(785) 841-0434 > > > > Definition of Windows XP: > > SPAM, thinly disguised as an operating system > > -- > -- > Take care, > > Seth > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 727-919-1598 > -- Take care, Seth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 727-919-1598 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] hi!! samba team
To connect to a windows server: smbclient -L //server/share Are you using linux? The command to mount a directory in linux looks something like this in linux: smbmount //$i/"$n" /mnt/NetWork/$i/"$n" -o uid=username,gid=users,guest,rw,fmask=777 Where: i=server n=share name /mnt/Network is your mounting directory. YMMV. Joel On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 03:35:37AM +0300, poet wrote: > i have been sitting on the samba conf and cant understand how to mount windows > dir from linux box/ > i edit the config file and i can set my window to connect the linux > but dont know what to do to mount to win . > if you could help i will be very thankfull > > bye:-) > -- > Dekel Ophir > this e-mail was sent using KDE mail , running on R.H. linux7.3 (2.4.8-13) > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Quickbooks
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 07:39:02PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote: > This is set up with Win2K boxes sharing a QB file on a SAMBA share. It may > be quite different than with 95-98x-ME(Miserable Edition). > > There are two or more problems - one thing I identified is that it is > possible for two computers to connect to the QB(QuickBooks) share using the > same quick books logon - something that will cause data corruption. > (Something that could have been easily addressed in the QB software too -- > can't wait till GNUcash does invoices). > > The smb.conf that follows seems to have fixed this problem > > The other problem only starts after the file size reaches the magic > 16777216 byte file size - after that size sharing a QB file on SAMBA seems > to cause corruption on it's own. > > After a talking with several folks at Intuit - - (and being told twice that > running off a Linux server was not problem) I found a brighter tech who > told me that they don't support linux as a server and they have notes > showing that they know about the file corruption problems that they can't > show us. They don't think there is a work-around, but then I think they are > probably wrong. > > I have added > > oplocks = no > strict locking = yes > > To the share definition. And will know if it works in a while. Also can you tell me what version of Samba you are using please ? There were several fixes that went into 2.2.4 that may help your problem. Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Quickbooks
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 07:39:02PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote: > This is set up with Win2K boxes sharing a QB file on a SAMBA share. It may > be quite different than with 95-98x-ME(Miserable Edition). > > There are two or more problems - one thing I identified is that it is > possible for two computers to connect to the QB(QuickBooks) share using the > same quick books logon - something that will cause data corruption. > (Something that could have been easily addressed in the QB software too -- > can't wait till GNUcash does invoices). > > The smb.conf that follows seems to have fixed this problem > > The other problem only starts after the file size reaches the magic > 16777216 byte file size - after that size sharing a QB file on SAMBA seems > to cause corruption on it's own. > > After a talking with several folks at Intuit - - (and being told twice that > running off a Linux server was not problem) I found a brighter tech who > told me that they don't support linux as a server and they have notes > showing that they know about the file corruption problems that they can't > show us. They don't think there is a work-around, but then I think they are > probably wrong. > > I have added > > oplocks = no > strict locking = yes > > To the share definition. And will know if it works in a while. > > If this gets to Andrew Trigell's attention, let him know that I will supply > him with QB software to test this out if he needs it - all he has to do is ask. Andrew is still in Germany. Can you provide me with the software and instructions to reproduce the problem so I can ensure it is fixed in the SAMBA_2_2 and HEAD code streams please ! Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba + Quickbooks
This is set up with Win2K boxes sharing a QB file on a SAMBA share. It may be quite different than with 95-98x-ME(Miserable Edition). There are two or more problems - one thing I identified is that it is possible for two computers to connect to the QB(QuickBooks) share using the same quick books logon - something that will cause data corruption. (Something that could have been easily addressed in the QB software too -- can't wait till GNUcash does invoices). The smb.conf that follows seems to have fixed this problem The other problem only starts after the file size reaches the magic 16777216 byte file size - after that size sharing a QB file on SAMBA seems to cause corruption on it's own. After a talking with several folks at Intuit - - (and being told twice that running off a Linux server was not problem) I found a brighter tech who told me that they don't support linux as a server and they have notes showing that they know about the file corruption problems that they can't show us. They don't think there is a work-around, but then I think they are probably wrong. I have added oplocks = no strict locking = yes To the share definition. And will know if it works in a while. If this gets to Andrew Trigell's attention, let him know that I will supply him with QB software to test this out if he needs it - all he has to do is ask. The files and directories belong to accounting.accounting the permissions are set to 770 NO guarantee if this works - It will take some weeks of just using it to see if I have it fixed - in the mean time I'm dong lots of verifydata and backing up several times/ day. Any feed back here will be more than welcome smb.conf follows: #=== Global Base parameters === [global] netbios name = servername workgroup = workgroup server string = AMD800mHz 200mHz SFB 376MB RAM level2 oplocks=yes # Global logging == log level = 2 syslog = 0 max log size = 2000 #== Global security issues = encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd #unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* #unix password sync=yes hosts allow = 192.168.1. security = user # Global tunning parameters === socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY #dead time = 15 #= Global printer params printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log #= Global Browser Control Options domain master = yes password server = * local master = yes os level = 67 preferred master = yes # Global Wins parameters === wins support = yes name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast # Share Definitions == [homes] writable = yes browsable = no [accounting] browseable=yes comment = /home/accounting Quick books share directory path = /home/accounting oplocks = no strict locking = yes writable = yes create mask = 770 directory mask=770 force group = accounting valid users = norma, karl, malaysia # the above users all belong to the accounting group -- Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com 3209 West 9th Street Ph(785) 841-3089 Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX(785) 841-0434 Definition of Windows XP: SPAM, thinly disguised as an operating system --
[Samba] hi!! samba team
i have been sitting on the samba conf and cant understand how to mount windows dir from linux box/ i edit the config file and i can set my window to connect the linux but dont know what to do to mount to win . if you could help i will be very thankfull bye:-) -- Dekel Ophir this e-mail was sent using KDE mail , running on R.H. linux7.3 (2.4.8-13) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba - cannot print multiple copies
Hi Joel, Thank you for the info. Still not sure why I can't do multiple prints. I'll just accept that limitation and enjoy that my 1 copy printed through samba/freebsd looks better than how windows printed it :) Cheers. Mike Samuel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel Hammer I do not have that option for notepad, but I do for wordpad. I get two copies when I ask for it. No problem. Here is my smb.conf file for my printer. Don't be mystified by the long print command. That is just to capture the print job name for debugging stuff and to get a decent display of the job name in the windows print queue. I mean, who need to see The command is really just: /usr/bin/lpr -Pps -J"$a" %s; rm %s where a is captured from the J variable passed by windows to the samba server. Otherwise, the name is just too long to display, sometimes. If you don't use the %J variable, you get the silly smbprn.000400.CFI7Uf name. [ps] comment = Filtered for Z53 path = /tmp read only = No create mask = 0700 guest ok = Yes hosts allow = 192.168. printable = Yes printing = lprng print command = echo %J %p %s >> /tmp/junkJ;\ a="`echo '%J' | sed "s/^.*- //"`" ;\ echo This is truncated $a >> /tmp/junkJ;\ /usr/bin/lpr -Pps -J"$a" %s;\ rm %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -Pps lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -Pps %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold z53 %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release z53 %j share modes = No Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Changing ACLs using W2k client and samba server with bestbits ACL patch
I have a linux server with the bestbits ACL patch, running samba (that has successfully joined the domain). I built the samba server "--with-acl-support". I can make changes to the ACLs on the linux box, and see the changes on the W2k client. However I cannot make any changes to ACLs using the W2k client. Whenever I try to make changes to the ACLs on the W2k client and press APPLY or OK, the items in the window revert back to the original. Am I doing something wrong? Or is this the default behavior? Linux Server RH7.2 kernel: 2.4.18 with betsbits acl patch version 0.8.26 samba: 2.2.3a built "--with-acl-support" Client Windows 2000 Thanks -Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba does not work over masquerade
David: > Its not a samba problem. NetbiosDGM needs to be proxies. If you can > use ipfilter, look at the netbios proxy. I believe port 137 needs to > be proxied as well. The netbiosdgm proxy in ipfilter changes part of > the payload in the netbios dgm packet to work with NAT. I am not sure what you are talking about. This is well beyond my current understanding. I am running a freshly-installed RedHat 7.3 distribution. Are there instructions on setting this up on a RedHat 7.3 machine? Thanks, Neil. -- Neil Aggarwal JAMM Consulting, Inc.(972) 612-6056, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com Custom Internet DevelopmentWebsites, Ecommerce, Java, databases -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba - cannot print multiple copies
I do not have that option for notepad, but I do for wordpad. I get two copies when I ask for it. No problem. Here is my smb.conf file for my printer. Don't be mystified by the long print command. That is just to capture the print job name for debugging stuff and to get a decent display of the job name in the windows print queue. I mean, who need to see The command is really just: /usr/bin/lpr -Pps -J"$a" %s; rm %s where a is captured from the J variable passed by windows to the samba server. Otherwise, the name is just too long to display, sometimes. If you don't use the %J variable, you get the silly smbprn.000400.CFI7Uf name. [ps] comment = Filtered for Z53 path = /tmp read only = No create mask = 0700 guest ok = Yes hosts allow = 192.168. printable = Yes printing = lprng print command = echo %J %p %s >> /tmp/junkJ;\ a="`echo '%J' | sed "s/^.*- //"`" ;\ echo This is truncated $a >> /tmp/junkJ;\ /usr/bin/lpr -Pps -J"$a" %s;\ rm %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -Pps lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -Pps %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold z53 %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release z53 %j share modes = No Joel On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 03:25:37PM -0700, Maithri Samuel wrote: > Hi Joel, > > I'm running windows 2000 and in notepad, I select > FILE menu, select PRINT. In the dialogue box that > pops up, there's an option NUMBER OF COPIES. > > I also tried multiple copies in WORD. No luck, > still only 1 copy. Frankly, I'm kinda stumped. > Anyone who can print multiple copies care to > paste their printcap/smb.conf? > > Cheers. > > Mike Samuel > > -Original Message- > From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: May 10, 2002 3:19 PM > > How do you sed 20 copies from notepad? I don't see any option to print a > certain number of copies. > Joel > > > Hi, > > > > I successfully setup printing on my FreeBSD box > > using Samba with apsfilter and lprng. However, I > > have encountered two issues: > > > > 1) Cannot print multiple copies of documents from > > my windows box (e.g. notepad). Only the first > > copy is printed and the rest don't get printed. > > 2) My spool directory is getting filled up and > > I would like the job removed after the print > > job is finished > > > > I've tried: > > - selecting collated and not collated in the > > windows printing, that didn't fix the problem. > > Still one copy printed. > > - adding lpd_bounce in both and also one at a time in > > the /etc/printcap and in the /usr/local/etc/lpd.conf. > > /etc/printcap -> added :lpd_bounce:\ before my :mx line > > /usr/local/etc/lpd.conf -> changed to > > # default lpd_bounce (FLAG on) > > Still one copy printed. Changed them back to not have > > lpd_bounce but still only one copy ;) > > - even when I do lpr -r DOC_NAME in FreeBSD, > > it still leaves stuff in the spool directory. > > I use lprm - to flush it > > > > Things I've setup: > > - using the default lpd.conf and lpd.perms files. > > - not running passwords or custom freebsd users on samba. > > Strictly guest access by user nobody. > > - set up mode 1777 on the samba print dir > > - Ran checkpc -f -V. No problems. Had an old > > problem of not being able to access /dev/lpt0 but > > I fixed the access privilages (still wierd that > > we have to do that, the freebsd installed lpr > > didn't require that, why does lprng require > > changing the port's access rights?) > > - I can print multiple copies from the FreeBSD > > box if I run lpr -#N, up to the 20 limit I > > specified below. > > > > I will greatly appreciate help in fixing > > these two problems. I've included my setup files > > below. If there is any else that is required, > > please reply and I will include the details of > > that as well. > > > > Cheers. > > > > ** > > ** > > > > Current setup is: > > Windows 2000 client > > FreeBSD 4.5 server > > running > > Samba-2.2.2_3 > > Apsfilter-7.2.2 > > LPRng-3.8.10 > > > > /ETC/Printcap > > # APS1_BEGIN:printer1 > > # - don't delete start label for apsfilter printer1 > > # - no other printer defines between BEGIN and END LABEL > > HP-Deskjet-560C|stp/pcl-560;r=300x300;q=high;c=full;p=letter;m=auto:\ > > :lp=/dev/lpt0:\ > > :if=/usr/local/etc/apsfilter/basedir/bin/apsfilter:\ > > :sd=/var/spool/lpd/HP-Deskjet-560C:\ > > :lf=/var/spool/lpd/HP-Deskjet-560C/log:\ > > :af=/var/spool/lpd/HP-Deskjet-560C/acct:\ > > :mx#0:\ > > :mc#20:\ > > :sh: > > # APS1_END - don't delete this > > > > /USR/LOCAL/ETC/SMB.CONF > > [global] > > ... > > load printers = yes > > use client driver = yes > > printing = lprng > > guest account = nobody > > max log size = 50 > > security = share > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY > > dns proxy = no > > domain master = yes > > preferred master = yes >
Re: [Samba] After reIP, Samba hosts not browsable.
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Herb Lewis wrote: > If you are set up to use WINS this is definitely your problem. > If possible upgrade your samba systems to 2.2.4. Previous > versions had a bug where the would not register with the > WINS server if there was an old registration there - even > if that was no longer being defended. > > "Van Sickler, Jim" wrote: > > > > Did you update the hosts/lmhosts files on > > all of the servers & clients? If not, > > they still contain the IP info from your > > old scheme... Hello Herb and Jim, I checked, and the hosts and lmhosts files did not contain any old IP information. I did go ahead and upgrade one of my machines to 2.2.4, with no change - the host still did not appear in Network Neighborhood. I checked with the Windows guys, and there was no previous machine account on the domain for that machine. Before the reIP, it was browsable. This seems to point 100% at WINS, but I hope that I'm not ruffling too many feathers by continuing this thread here - I think that this is probably the best group to help, even though it doesn't seem to be a problem exclusively with Samba. I very much appreciate the suggestions so far, and thanks in advance for any further help you folks can give. :) Benny ~~ Always carry a short length of fibre-optic cable. If you get lost, then you can drop it on the ground, wait ten minutes, and ask the backhoe operator how to get back to civilization. -Alan Frame -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Unix Group Question with repect to Samba
Well, I now feel like I have egg on my face! After getting two responses that mentioned this should work I rebooted my PC where I have been testing this. That seemed to fix the problem. I can now use a user list for groups (which is totally awesome). Sorry to bother the list with such a trivial problem but I really didn't see any mention of this in the manual or in a quick scan through the archives. Reagrds, Brett Bartick VP Corporate Technology Nomura Securities International, Inc. 2 World Financial Center New York, NY 10281 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 5:59 PM To: Bartick, Brett Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Samba] Unix Group Question with repect to Samba On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:31:55PM -0400, Bartick, Brett wrote: > I have a question with regards to using Unix groups with samba. This might > be easier to explain with an example. > > Lets say I have two users > > UserID: GID > UserA:Group1 > UserB:Group2 > > etc. > > I now have an entry in /etc/group that looks like > > groupdev::UserA, UserB > > If I have a directory with group ownership set to "groupdev" and group mode > "rws" > UserA & UserB cannot create a file in the share on their Windows machine. > But if they connect to the Unix host, no problem. > Does Samba understand user lists for group permissioning? Yes, Samba should load the primary and supplementary groups into the user security context. There must be something else wrong in the setup on that share. Can you post your smb.conf ? Thanks, Jeremy. - This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and all copies from your system, destroy any hard copies and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Nomura Holding America Inc., Nomura Securities International, Inc, and their respective subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state the views of such entity. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information in this message is indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba does not work over masquerade
Hello: I am using iptables to masquerade my machines behind my DSL connection. I am trying to access a samba share on a remote machine. When I try to connect to the samba share with my computer plugged into my hub (and therefore masqueraded by my linux router), I cant connect to the share. But, if I plug my computer directly into the DSL modem, I have no problems with samba. So, it looks like samba does not work from a masqueraded machine. Has anyone been able to set this up? Thanks, Neil. -- Neil Aggarwal JAMM Consulting, Inc.(972) 612-6056, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com Custom Internet DevelopmentWebsites, Ecommerce, Java, databases -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unix Group Question with repect to Samba
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:31:55PM -0400, Bartick, Brett wrote: > I have a question with regards to using Unix groups with samba. This might > be easier to explain with an example. > > Lets say I have two users > > UserID: GID > UserA:Group1 > UserB:Group2 > > etc. > > I now have an entry in /etc/group that looks like > > groupdev::UserA, UserB > > If I have a directory with group ownership set to "groupdev" and group mode > "rws" > UserA & UserB cannot create a file in the share on their Windows machine. > But if they connect to the Unix host, no problem. > Does Samba understand user lists for group permissioning? Yes, Samba should load the primary and supplementary groups into the user security context. There must be something else wrong in the setup on that share. Can you post your smb.conf ? Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unix Group Question with repect to Samba
I've set things up almost exactly like that before, with no problems. Did you set the share to be writable in smb.conf? If the share is configured to be read-only it would show the behavior you describe. On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:31:55PM -0400, Bartick, Brett wrote: > I have a question with regards to using Unix groups with samba. This might > be easier to explain with an example. > > Lets say I have two users > > UserID: GID > UserA:Group1 > UserB:Group2 > > etc. > > I now have an entry in /etc/group that looks like > > groupdev::UserA, UserB > > If I have a directory with group ownership set to "groupdev" and group mode > "rws" > UserA & UserB cannot create a file in the share on their Windows machine. > But if they connect to the Unix host, no problem. > Does Samba understand user lists for group permissioning? -- That feeling just came over me. -- Albert DeSalvo, the "Boston Strangler" -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Unix Group Question with repect to Samba
I have a question with regards to using Unix groups with samba. This might be easier to explain with an example. Lets say I have two users UserID: GID UserA:Group1 UserB:Group2 etc. I now have an entry in /etc/group that looks like groupdev::UserA, UserB If I have a directory with group ownership set to "groupdev" and group mode "rws" UserA & UserB cannot create a file in the share on their Windows machine. But if they connect to the Unix host, no problem. Does Samba understand user lists for group permissioning? Thanks, Brett Bartick VP Corporate Technology Nomura Securities International, Inc. 2 World Financial Center New York, NY 10281 - This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and all copies from your system, destroy any hard copies and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Nomura Holding America Inc., Nomura Securities International, Inc, and their respective subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state the views of such entity. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information in this message is indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: RE: [Samba] Win2k Printing Problems
What port is listed on the Properties box on the Win2k PC? see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q255507 I'd think it should list the network share, e.g. \\samba2\hp4plus like that. What does your /etc/printcap have listed for the printer ports? mine are: :rm=192.168.2.2 :rp=raw JIm > -Original Message- > From: JUSTIN GERRY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RE: [Samba] Win2k Printing Problems > > > I made all the changes you suggested. I restarted smb,nmb and lpd just > to be sure. > > My Win2k box is still giving me the same error under "status" "failed > to open, retrying" and eventually "access denied; unable to > connect" on > the queue. > > Other permissions to check?? > > Thanks, > Justin > > > >>> "Van Sickler, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/10 4:33 PM >>> > Try commenting out the "printer admin=" entry > -use it only when installing drivers? > > I believe you also have to create a dir for > samba to spool to, chmod 01777, chown root.daemon > > e.g. /var/spool/samba > > and change the "path=" entry to it. > > Jim > > > -Original Message- > > From: JUSTIN GERRY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:05 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Samba] Win2k Printing Problems > > > > > > I just joined this list, If this has been answered before I > apologize: > > > > I have a Redhat 7.2 box running Samba 2.2.4 > > > > I have a few printers running on JetDirect boxes that I am > attempting > > to print to. > > > > I used printconf in Redhat to set them up within the linux box. > > Everything works fine from the linux box. > > > > I set them up within samba (see [printers] below), but when I print > I > > get "Failed to open, retrying" on the queue. > > > > If I do remove "use client driver=yes", I can then print but Win2k > > tells me that under "status" that "access denied; unable to > > connect" on > > the queue. > > > > I've tried testing with "use client driver=yes" and "disable spoolss > = > > yes" and it does not seem to make much difference other than > > getting rid > > of the "access denied; unable to connect error" > > > > Here is what I think the important section in the smb.conf > > > > [printers] > > comment = All Printers > > path = /var/spool/lpd > > printer admin = jgerry > > guest ok = Yes > > printable = Yes > > use client driver = Yes > > browseable = No > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Cannot find Primary Domain - Please help, rather urge nt
> -Original Message- > From: John Biggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Samba] Cannot find Primary Domain - Please help, > rather urgent > > > Hello, > > I'm getting a persistent error at login (effectively locking > me out) on > two Win2k machines that were once assigned to a domain on my windows > network (win2k server was once the PDC, just changed to Samba) > > Cannot log you into the primary because the system's > computer account > is missing or the password was incorrect. > Add the samba server info to: c:\winnt\system32\drivers\etc\hosts c:\winnt\system32\drivers\etc\lmhosts on the Win2k PCs and remove the old server info > The old domain was: > yrbmag.yellowrat.com > > and I'd like every just to be in workgroup YRBMAG > > My configure file follows. What am I doing wrong? Is there a > way to fake > the domain so I can login and switch to the workgroup? Luckily enough, > the previous admin here at the shop forgot the admin > passwords for both > machines, rendering my job even harder. Super! > One way to fix that (keeping existing account info, but creating new admin password) is to "upgrade" your Win2k systems to Win2k again. You'll have to re-install all of your IE5.x, DirectX, SP2 (unless you build a "streamlined" version of Win2k, which would then have SP2 incorporated), etc. If you don't care about the user accounts, just run SysPrep 1.1 and reboot; you'll be prompted for the admin & networking info, and everything else will be as was. SysPrep is used to create a machine that would act as the source PC for imaging, e.g. Ghost, etc. The first time it boots it prompts for info... Jim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: RE: [Samba] Win2k Printing Problems
I made all the changes you suggested. I restarted smb,nmb and lpd just to be sure. My Win2k box is still giving me the same error under "status" "failed to open, retrying" and eventually "access denied; unable to connect" on the queue. Other permissions to check?? Thanks, Justin >>> "Van Sickler, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/10 4:33 PM >>> Try commenting out the "printer admin=" entry -use it only when installing drivers? I believe you also have to create a dir for samba to spool to, chmod 01777, chown root.daemon e.g. /var/spool/samba and change the "path=" entry to it. Jim > -Original Message- > From: JUSTIN GERRY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Samba] Win2k Printing Problems > > > I just joined this list, If this has been answered before I apologize: > > I have a Redhat 7.2 box running Samba 2.2.4 > > I have a few printers running on JetDirect boxes that I am attempting > to print to. > > I used printconf in Redhat to set them up within the linux box. > Everything works fine from the linux box. > > I set them up within samba (see [printers] below), but when I print I > get "Failed to open, retrying" on the queue. > > If I do remove "use client driver=yes", I can then print but Win2k > tells me that under "status" that "access denied; unable to > connect" on > the queue. > > I've tried testing with "use client driver=yes" and "disable spoolss = > yes" and it does not seem to make much difference other than > getting rid > of the "access denied; unable to connect error" > > Here is what I think the important section in the smb.conf > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/lpd > printer admin = jgerry > guest ok = Yes > printable = Yes > use client driver = Yes > browseable = No > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > Justin > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Upgrade From 2.2.3a to 2.2.4 Broke Solaris 8 PDC
Trying to upgrade from 2.2.3a to 2.2.4 broke our Solaris 8 PDC. We see the following issues: - Compile flag -KPIC is not valid for gcc, does not seem to bread build - Now looks like directory /usr/spool/samba is needed, but not created by install - smbclient -L hemlock fails with login problem: [2001/10/16 10:43:28, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1295) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to connect to SMB server on machine SEQUOIA. Error was : code 0. [2001/10/16 10:43:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1591) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/10/16 10:43:42, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1295) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to connect to SMB server on machine SEQUOIA. Error was : code 0. [2001/10/16 10:43:42, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1591) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/10/16 15:41:18, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1296) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to connect to SMB server on machine SEQUOIA. Error was : code 0. [2001/10/16 15:41:18, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1591) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/10/22 11:21:06, 0] smbd/chgpasswd.c:check_oem_password(811) check_oem_password: incorrect password length (-628830915). What I find interesting about this is, hemlock is the PDC and it appears that it is asking sequoia to do the authentication. Nothing has been changed in the smb.conf file and a diff of the testparm output between the two version of samba gives us no clue as to the cause of failure. -- Regards, David Highley Phone: (206) 669-0081 Highley Recommended, Inc. FAX: (253) 838-8509 2927 SW 339th Street Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Federal Way, WA 98023-7732 WEB: http://www.highley-recommended.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Win2k Printing Problems
Try commenting out the "printer admin=" entry -use it only when installing drivers? I believe you also have to create a dir for samba to spool to, chmod 01777, chown root.daemon e.g. /var/spool/samba and change the "path=" entry to it. Jim > -Original Message- > From: JUSTIN GERRY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Samba] Win2k Printing Problems > > > I just joined this list, If this has been answered before I apologize: > > I have a Redhat 7.2 box running Samba 2.2.4 > > I have a few printers running on JetDirect boxes that I am attempting > to print to. > > I used printconf in Redhat to set them up within the linux box. > Everything works fine from the linux box. > > I set them up within samba (see [printers] below), but when I print I > get "Failed to open, retrying" on the queue. > > If I do remove "use client driver=yes", I can then print but Win2k > tells me that under "status" that "access denied; unable to > connect" on > the queue. > > I've tried testing with "use client driver=yes" and "disable spoolss = > yes" and it does not seem to make much difference other than > getting rid > of the "access denied; unable to connect error" > > Here is what I think the important section in the smb.conf > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/lpd > printer admin = jgerry > guest ok = Yes > printable = Yes > use client driver = Yes > browseable = No > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > Justin > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cannot find Primary Domain - Please help, rather urgent
Hello, I'm getting a persistent error at login (effectively locking me out) on two Win2k machines that were once assigned to a domain on my windows network (win2k server was once the PDC, just changed to Samba) Cannot log you into the primary because the system's computer account is missing or the password was incorrect. The old domain was: yrbmag.yellowrat.com and I'd like every just to be in workgroup YRBMAG My configure file follows. What am I doing wrong? Is there a way to fake the domain so I can login and switch to the workgroup? Luckily enough, the previous admin here at the shop forgot the admin passwords for both machines, rendering my job even harder. Super! smb.conf: # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!) most of which are not shown in this example # # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you # may wish to enable # # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command "testparm" # to check that you have not made any basic syntactic errors. # #=== Global Settings = [global] smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd path = /home domain master = yes printing = cups dns proxy = no null passwords = yes encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 printcap name = lpstat wins support = true max log size = 50 debug level = 3 security = user domain logons = yes workgroup = YRBMAG server string = IBM900 Deux comment = Home Dirs log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m netbios name = IBM900 load printers = yes netbios aliases = yrbmag.yellowrat.com YRBMAG default = netlogon [netlogon] comment = Network Login Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no share modes = no [homes] path = /home writable = yes browseable = no comment = Home Directories [Druk] path = /var/spool/samba printer = Druk comment = GCC Elite BW printable = yes [Shared Files] path = /home/share comment = YRB Shared Files -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Win2k Printing Problems
I just joined this list, If this has been answered before I apologize: I have a Redhat 7.2 box running Samba 2.2.4 I have a few printers running on JetDirect boxes that I am attempting to print to. I used printconf in Redhat to set them up within the linux box. Everything works fine from the linux box. I set them up within samba (see [printers] below), but when I print I get "Failed to open, retrying" on the queue. If I do remove "use client driver=yes", I can then print but Win2k tells me that under "status" that "access denied; unable to connect" on the queue. I've tried testing with "use client driver=yes" and "disable spoolss = yes" and it does not seem to make much difference other than getting rid of the "access denied; unable to connect error" Here is what I think the important section in the smb.conf [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/lpd printer admin = jgerry guest ok = Yes printable = Yes use client driver = Yes browseable = No Any suggestions? Thanks, Justin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba - cannot print multiple copies
> Hi, > > I successfully setup printing on my FreeBSD box > using Samba with apsfilter and lprng. However, I > have encountered two issues: > > 1) Cannot print multiple copies of documents from > my windows box (e.g. notepad). Only the first > copy is printed and the rest don't get printed. http://www.linuxprinting.org/ for possible solution(s)? > 2) My spool directory is getting filled up and > I would like the job removed after the print > job is finished > modify > print command = /usr/local/bin/lpr -P%p %s to read > print command = /usr/local/bin/lpr -r -P%p %s or maybe > print command = /usr/local/bin/lpr -r -s -P%p %s Jim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Help
yes, you can. Rasmus At 12:41 10-05-2002 -0700, Mauricio Vasquez wrote: Can I use samba 2.2.4 as a domain controller thanks Mauricio Vasquez
RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC
Log in from the W98 client and run smbstatus on the server, to see what shows up You can set the log level to 3 or higher, and look in the log.w98pc (or whatever the hostname is) during the failed/successful attempts to see why it fails the first time and works the second. The same (domain?) user account is being used on both the Win2k/W98 login attempts? Jim > -Original Message- > From: Alex Moen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:16 PM > To: Van Sickler, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > Tried this... didn't help. > > An update: I got the Win2K machine to finally join the domain > using "root" > and it's password. I hate that, but I am using a different > password for the > samba side than the Unix side. > > Also, I can log in using my regular domain account on the Win2K server > perfectly. So, obviously samba is configured properly, and there's > something specific to Win98 that I am missing... > > It is ultimately consistent in logging in every other time... > even after a > logout, it takes two login attempts to get back in on the > Win98 client. > > Wierd. > > Alex > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Van Sickler, Jim > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:28 PM > > To: 'Alex Moen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > > > > Make sure the clients/server have the server > > info in their hosts/lmhosts files. > > > > Jim > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Alex Moen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:02 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > > > > > > > Good information, and I will definitely investigate this. > However, my > > > domain right now is in a test situation (working on replacing > > > an NT 4.0 > > > domain with this) and is not on our main network which does > > > consist of Cisco > > > switches. I have it set up on a small cheapo switch, > > > isolated from the main > > > network, where the only thing that is on the switch is the > > > Samba box, the > > > W2K box, and the W98 client. Also, DHCP shows no signs of > > > any problems: the > > > workstation gets an address with no delay. > > > > > > Any other ideas that I can try? > > > > > > Thanks!! > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > > Behalf Of Mac > > > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:58 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Dirk Allaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >To: Alex Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Subject: Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > > >Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:46:32 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Alex Moen wrote: > > > > >> Wierd thing #1: Windows 98 client will NOT connect on > > > first attempt: > > > > >> type in username and password, hit enter, wait 2 > minutes, failure > > > > >> message. Click OK on the failure popup, hit enter again > > > on the login > > > > >> dialogue, wait another 2 minutes and client logs in almost > > > > perfectly (by > > > > >> almost: trouble with home directory %u thingie). Any ideas? > > > > >> > > > > >I am not sure this is a samba issue. I have also seen > this once a > > > > >Windows NT 4 PDC and a somebody reported me this on a > > > Windows 2000 ADC > > > > >(always with windows 98). Seemed to have to do with > > > networking stuff. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I the Windows 2000 case, the guy that told me had > > > contacted CISCO (they > > > > >were using a CISCO layer 3 switch) and CISCO changed some > > > stuff on the > > > > >switch (don't know what). Same scenario for NT 4 case: > > > Baystack switch, > > > > >PC's with Accton network card. Changed speed on switches > > > (half duplex). > > > > >Problem did not completely disappear but sure improved. > > > > > > > > > > > > This sounds highly likely. The Cisco 'stuff' they changed > > > was probably > > > > 'portfast'. > > > > > > > > See:- > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html > > > > > > > > for an explnation of why it can tkae upto a minute for a > > > switch to start > > > > passing packets after the PC has come up. Also some (Cisco > > > specific) > > > > steps you can take (with detailed instructions) to reduce > > > the problem. > > > > [One of the steps is to twiddle duplex settings, but it's > > > the very last > > > > thing to try]. > > > > > > > > > > > >Mac > > > > Assistant Systems Adminstrator @nibsc.ac.uk > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Work: +44 1707 654753 x285 Everything else: +44 7956 > > > > 237670 (anytime) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL > and read the > > > >
[Samba] Samba - cannot print multiple copies
Hi, I successfully setup printing on my FreeBSD box using Samba with apsfilter and lprng. However, I have encountered two issues: 1) Cannot print multiple copies of documents from my windows box (e.g. notepad). Only the first copy is printed and the rest don't get printed. 2) My spool directory is getting filled up and I would like the job removed after the print job is finished I've tried: - selecting collated and not collated in the windows printing, that didn't fix the problem. Still one copy printed. - adding lpd_bounce in both and also one at a time in the /etc/printcap and in the /usr/local/etc/lpd.conf. /etc/printcap -> added :lpd_bounce:\ before my :mx line /usr/local/etc/lpd.conf -> changed to # default lpd_bounce (FLAG on) Still one copy printed. Changed them back to not have lpd_bounce but still only one copy ;) - even when I do lpr -r DOC_NAME in FreeBSD, it still leaves stuff in the spool directory. I use lprm - to flush it Things I've setup: - using the default lpd.conf and lpd.perms files. - not running passwords or custom freebsd users on samba. Strictly guest access by user nobody. - set up mode 1777 on the samba print dir - Ran checkpc -f -V. No problems. Had an old problem of not being able to access /dev/lpt0 but I fixed the access privilages (still wierd that we have to do that, the freebsd installed lpr didn't require that, why does lprng require changing the port's access rights?) - I can print multiple copies from the FreeBSD box if I run lpr -#N, up to the 20 limit I specified below. I will greatly appreciate help in fixing these two problems. I've included my setup files below. If there is any else that is required, please reply and I will include the details of that as well. Cheers. ** ** Current setup is: Windows 2000 client FreeBSD 4.5 server running Samba-2.2.2_3 Apsfilter-7.2.2 LPRng-3.8.10 /ETC/Printcap # APS1_BEGIN:printer1 # - don't delete start label for apsfilter printer1 # - no other printer defines between BEGIN and END LABEL HP-Deskjet-560C|stp/pcl-560;r=300x300;q=high;c=full;p=letter;m=auto:\ :lp=/dev/lpt0:\ :if=/usr/local/etc/apsfilter/basedir/bin/apsfilter:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/HP-Deskjet-560C:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/HP-Deskjet-560C/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/HP-Deskjet-560C/acct:\ :mx#0:\ :mc#20:\ :sh: # APS1_END - don't delete this /USR/LOCAL/ETC/SMB.CONF [global] ... load printers = yes use client driver = yes printing = lprng guest account = nobody max log size = 50 security = share socket options = TCP_NODELAY dns proxy = no domain master = yes preferred master = yes #print command = /usr/local/bin/lpr -U%U%M -P%p -r %s; print command = /usr/local/bin/lpr -P%p %s;\ rm %s lpq command = /usr/local/bin/lpq -P%p %s lprm command = /usr/local/bin/lprm -P%p %j lppause command = /usr/local/sbin/lpc hold %p %j lpresume command = /usr/local/sbin/lpc release %p %j queuepause command = /usr/local/sbin/lpc -P%p stop queueresume command = /usr/local/sbin/lpc -P%p start # Share Definitions == [Storage] comment = Temporary Server file area path = /tmp read only = no public = yes writeable = yes guest ok = yes [printers] comment = All printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no printer = raw printer name = HP-Deskjet-560C public = yes guest ok = yes writeable = no printable = yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] "." at the end of files/folders name causing problem!
Hi, Is this very well known, is there a workaround? Log to your Unix Samba server. Create in one of your share the following folders: mkdir -p test mkdir -p test./A Get on your Windows and access the share... Access the "test." directory... welcome in the "test" directory, not the "test." with the "." at the end. If the "test" directory didn't exists, Windows pops up a window with an error (something like, "can't find ..."). Try to delete the directory "test.". Guess what, Windows just erased the "test" directory... tested on Windows NT SP6a. Is there a "workaround"? Do we need a new configuration option... "hide windows dot files" but I guess I should use "hide files = /*./" , if I want to hide those type of files/folders... right? Thank you, Pierre B. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
FW: [Samba] Windows 2000 and Samba
No one had any other offerings here? I can't find anything that clears this up. And this machine can get to a Linux based Samba server just fine. Paul -Original Message- From: Paul Harlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:29 PM To: Samba List (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] Windows 2000 and Samba Sam: It wasn't pointing at the WINS server at first (the machine that I've primarily been working with) but is now and I've put an entry into the LMHosts file. I also changed the LMHosts file as you directed but it didn't help any. The DNS server works fine to resolve those names from both itself and the Win2k machine in question. Szilard: There was never a mapping on this machine though there was a 'shortcut' in "My Network Places". I got rid of that but the service to that server still doesn't work. Also, there was a reghack that I found for Win2k that added a longer timeout value to connect to this resource. That didn't help either. Any other ideas or thoughts are greatly appreciated! Paul -Original Message- From: Sam Barasch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:41 PM To: Samba List (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] Windows 2000 and Samba It sounds like you're having a windows networking error - do you have both faulty w2k machines and the samba server pointing at the WINS server? Or better yet, is your samba server configured as a WINS server? If it's a windows networking error, try renaming %system root%\system32\drivers\etc\lmhosts.sam to %system root%\system32\drivers\etc\lmhosts (i.e. remove the .sam file suffix) read the comments in the lmhosts file and edit the lmhosts file as appropriate for your network Finally, check your DNS setup on the two faulty w2k machines, w2k relies on DNS a lot more for netbios name resolution. From the w2k command prompt, do a nslookup server name and see how long that takes - if that's not working you may need to tweak your DNS settings on those two w2k machines. I'm curious as to what's going on, so keep us posted. --- Sam Barasch Computer Systems Support Department of Biostatistics University of Wisconsin Madison At 12:18 PM 5/9/2002 -0600, Paul Harlow wrote: >"Windows cannot find '\\server1'. Check Spelling..." >and >"The semaphore timeout has expired..." >The semaphore error comes up about a tenth of the time that the other one >does. > >This server can be resolved without problems using both WINS and DNS. We're >not reaching across a subnet here, all machines affected are on the same >subnet. All machines, Win2k and WinNT4 can see this server in Network >Neighborhood/Places fine as well. It's just that when you click on them or >type their names in the address field they're not accessible with the given >messages returned as errors. >If already tried removing and reinstalling Windows Networking from these >machines to no avail. > >Paul > >-Original Message- >From: Sam Barasch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:45 AM >To: Paul Harlow; Samba List (E-mail) >Subject: Re: [Samba] Windows 2000 and Samba > > >Can the w2k pro machines see the AIX box in my network places? > >are you trying to do this across subnets? > >Is there an error message you can share? > >At 11:04 AM 5/9/2002 -0600, Paul Harlow wrote: > >I have a Samba server running on an AIX 4.4.3 RS6000 that has been serving > >up files without problem. Recently, a pair of machines, both Windows 2000 > >Pro, haven't been able to gain access to any of the Samba resources on the > >AIX server though they were both able to previously. Other WinNT and Win2k > >machines can get to these shared resources fine, just not these two. > >I haven't found anything yet to give a reason why or support a fix for >this. > >Does anyone have any suggestions or paths to lead me down? > > > >Paul Harlow CCNA, MCP > >System and Network Administrator > >SKLD Information Services LLC > >720 S. Colorado Blvd. Suite 1000N > >Denver, CO 80246 > >(303) 820-0861 > >(720) 313-6125 cell > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > >instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba authentication through NIS
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 02:35:05PM -0400, Anna Arbit wrote: > I got rid of the Domain conroller (well.. it crashed).. and there is no need > to have one. So right now i'm trying to make users authenticate vis NIS. Is > that at all possible? Samba can authenticate with NIS passwords if your client machines use cleartext passwords. As I recall, all versions of Windows after Windows 95 (or actually everything starting from NT4+SP3) want to use encrypted passwords only. I know that there are registry patches included with Samba to allow cleartext passwords, but you will have to apply them to every client PC. Look at the ENCRYPTION.txt file in the Samba documentation for more information on this, and look at the description of the "encrypt passwords" option in smb.conf. Personally, I would suggest setting up UNIX password sync instead. If you have more than a few client PCs it would be easier to get that working than to go around and apply registry changes to every PC, and you wouldn't have to remember to do it when you add or reinstall a machine. There are some complications with getting passwd sync and NIS to work together, check the list archives for the discussions. -- That feeling just came over me. -- Albert DeSalvo, the "Boston Strangler" -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC
Tried this... didn't help. An update: I got the Win2K machine to finally join the domain using "root" and it's password. I hate that, but I am using a different password for the samba side than the Unix side. Also, I can log in using my regular domain account on the Win2K server perfectly. So, obviously samba is configured properly, and there's something specific to Win98 that I am missing... It is ultimately consistent in logging in every other time... even after a logout, it takes two login attempts to get back in on the Win98 client. Wierd. Alex > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Van Sickler, Jim > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:28 PM > To: 'Alex Moen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > Make sure the clients/server have the server > info in their hosts/lmhosts files. > > Jim > > > -Original Message- > > From: Alex Moen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:02 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > > > > Good information, and I will definitely investigate this. However, my > > domain right now is in a test situation (working on replacing > > an NT 4.0 > > domain with this) and is not on our main network which does > > consist of Cisco > > switches. I have it set up on a small cheapo switch, > > isolated from the main > > network, where the only thing that is on the switch is the > > Samba box, the > > W2K box, and the W98 client. Also, DHCP shows no signs of > > any problems: the > > workstation gets an address with no delay. > > > > Any other ideas that I can try? > > > > Thanks!! > > > > Alex > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > Behalf Of Mac > > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:58 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > > > > > > > >From: Dirk Allaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: Alex Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > >Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:46:32 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Alex Moen wrote: > > > >> Wierd thing #1: Windows 98 client will NOT connect on > > first attempt: > > > >> type in username and password, hit enter, wait 2 minutes, failure > > > >> message. Click OK on the failure popup, hit enter again > > on the login > > > >> dialogue, wait another 2 minutes and client logs in almost > > > perfectly (by > > > >> almost: trouble with home directory %u thingie). Any ideas? > > > >> > > > >I am not sure this is a samba issue. I have also seen this once a > > > >Windows NT 4 PDC and a somebody reported me this on a > > Windows 2000 ADC > > > >(always with windows 98). Seemed to have to do with > > networking stuff. > > > > > > > > > > > >I the Windows 2000 case, the guy that told me had > > contacted CISCO (they > > > >were using a CISCO layer 3 switch) and CISCO changed some > > stuff on the > > > >switch (don't know what). Same scenario for NT 4 case: > > Baystack switch, > > > >PC's with Accton network card. Changed speed on switches > > (half duplex). > > > >Problem did not completely disappear but sure improved. > > > > > > > > > This sounds highly likely. The Cisco 'stuff' they changed > > was probably > > > 'portfast'. > > > > > > See:- > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html > > > > > > for an explnation of why it can tkae upto a minute for a > > switch to start > > > passing packets after the PC has come up. Also some (Cisco > > specific) > > > steps you can take (with detailed instructions) to reduce > > the problem. > > > [One of the steps is to twiddle duplex settings, but it's > > the very last > > > thing to try]. > > > > > > > > >Mac > > > Assistant Systems Adminstrator @nibsc.ac.uk > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Work: +44 1707 654753 x285 Everything else: +44 7956 > > > 237670 (anytime) > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Advice needed about remote colaboration
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 14:48, tristpost wrote: > I am about to start a small business together with two colleagues. We are all >located in different parts of the country and is in need of good remote collaboration >(we will do major software development). > > We will use VPN tunnels (over internet) between our computers. > okay you probably don't need this > Ideally I would like to set up one PDC at one site and backup DC at the two others. >All three machines could act as file servers where everyone maintain a CVS repository >for the parts of the software he is responsible for. > why would you want to do this - you don't need a domain for 3 people. > Unfortunately Samba is not able to act as backup domain controller at the moment (at >least not the stable release that we probably want to use). > > What other ways can one use Samba in this scenario? samba is great - but not the right tool for this situation... you want to use CVS so use it put up a CVS server and check out files to everybody's local machine everybody sees everything - just remember to commit often to avoid conflicts. maybe samba could be helpful for serving up a common share to pass around business documents (that you don't keep in cvs) - probably webdav would be better. > > The reason we want to have one server in each site is of course to be able to do >work even if the VPN tunnels are down. We want to be able to use the same user >account on all the three servers to avoid having to log in more than once... I think you are putting in too much overhead for 3 people. Everybody can manange their own account on the local machine and manually keep their passwords in sync on the server. If your really want one pwdb source you could use replicated ldap (replicated so that you can log in even if the network is offline). -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
I am not reading my mail at the moment due to problems with my hands. For enquiries related to the computer science department contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Neil Faulks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tel +44 20 7848 2007 Fax +44 870 120 9785 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Logging in to the domain
»Alexander Skwar« sagte am 2002-05-09 um 23:00:42 + : > So, the answer is yes, I assume that it is setup correctly. Hm, I'm now trying to debug what I might have done wrong. So I've set "log level = 5" in smb.conf and tried to login to the domain. From the logs, I see that the LDAP setup seems to be working, as samba successfully accessed the LDAP. However, I see this in the logs: [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(93) sess_key : BF40CE6A37019FCF [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(94) stor_cred: CA218FCF71C19C2D [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) timestamp: 0 [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(96) timecred : CA218FCF71C19C2D [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(97) calc_cred: 8C0FFDED509642ED [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(122) cred_assert [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(124) challenge : 4E5DEC5A5302C957 [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(125) calculated: 8C0FFDED509642ED [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(134) credentials check wrong [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(60) 00 net_io_r_auth_2 [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8s(645) data: 40 f2 1e 40 00 00 00 00 [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(558) 0008 neg_flags: 01ff [2002/05/10 18:31:28, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_ntstatus(587) 000c status: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Well, seems like NT is sending 4E5DEC5A5302C957 whereas samba is expecting 8C0FFDED509642ED. What's going on here? To me, this seems like something is setup wrong, either on the Samba side or on the Windows 2000 side. If somebody could please help me... Thanks, Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 3 hours 57 minutes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Keeping your code current via wget through an ftp proxy
I've recently figured out something that others may find useful...we have an ftp proxy, and I couldn't get cvs to work through it. I finally got wget working, and can now mirror my source to the current samba_2_2 version by downloading only the newer files. Then I can run ./configure, etc to update my system. - The command line is in a text file named wget1. I run it from my /eodc/shared/samba_2_2/source dir, by cd'ing to /eodc/shared/samba_2_2/source, then running ./wget1 Note that it's run from 4 dir's down; this is why I have "--cut-dirs=4"; so that the files end up in the same dir that I'm in. (If you set yours up with /22x_source, you'd make it "--cut-dirs=1") The "-nH" strips off the host info (pserver.samba.org). The "-S" displays server responses The "-m" is to mirror the source/destination dir's. According to WS-FTP Pro, our ftp proxy is a "User, no login" type. Yours may be different, so you may have to play with the command line to get wget to work. Believe me, I played for a while before I got it right! For us, we log in to the local ftp proxy with: the REMOTE ftp user and ftp site hostname/IP. The password is our e-mail address. The proxy passes that info on to the remote ftp site, and we're off and running. The destination directory is appended to the proxy IP:port, and passed on to the remote ftp server. Here's what works, with a bogus IP...substitute your proxy info and e-mail address: wget -nH --cut-dirs=4 -S -m ftp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.254.1:21/pu b/unpacked/samba_2_2/source Hope this helps someone... Jim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] mount -F ?
Kenny, smbfs is probably what you are looking for, but it is not supported by the kernel in Solaris. The options that I know of are: 1. Use Sharity (http://www.obdev.at/products/sharity/index.html) 2. Make Win2k export the directories via NFS 3. Set up a Linux box, mount the Share, then export the directory via NFS, then you can mount it in Solaris. Jason On Friday 10 May 2002 01:23 pm, Kenny Lo wrote: > Just want to mount a disk shared from win2k at solaris8. What file system > the shared disk is? > > I tried ntfs, samfs & cifs, they all not work at solaris. -- To find out where Michigan Gubernatorial Candidate Jennifer Granholm really stands, please visit http://www.granholmgarble.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Help
Yes. On Friday 10 May 2002 03:41 pm, Mauricio Vasquez wrote: > Can I use samba 2.2.4 as a domain controller > > > thanks > Mauricio Vasquez -- To find out where Michigan Gubernatorial Candidate Jennifer Granholm really stands, please visit http://www.granholmgarble.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba authentication through NIS
hello, I have a samba 2.2.0 server running on RedHat 7.0. It used to be part of domain and authenticate users logged into that domain. those who logged in locally to their pc, would authenticate against the smbpasswd net use \\samba\username /user: I got rid of the Domain conroller (well.. it crashed).. and there is no need to have one. So right now i'm trying to make users authenticate vis NIS. Is that at all possible? i want users to log into their machine using account and then going to DOS prompt and net use \\samba\ /user: Type password for \\samba\: how do i do that? I synced the smbpasswd file with the yppasswd but it doesn't work. any help is appreciated :) thank you in advance, anna -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Help
Can I use samba 2.2.4 as a domain controller thanks Mauricio Vasquez
Re: [Samba] Problem with samba 2.2.4 and Mandrake 8.2
»Alexander Skwar« sagte am 2002-05-10 um 18:11:12 + : > The cooker package (2.2.4-1mdk) was built with LDAP support. Thus, it > cannot (?) do normal lookups and needs a LDAP. Attached is the message from the Cooker list about this problem. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 3 hours 51 minutes --- Begin Message --- Somehow the following crept into the specfile during preparation for the samba-2.2.4 release (Mandrake packaging stuff is now in samba CVS, so you can actually build RPMs from a samba tarball with "cd packaging/Mandrake; sh makerpms.sh", although this wil currently cause the same problem on cooker;-)): # Set defaults for each version %if %build_cooker %define build_acl 1 %define build_winbind 1 %define build_wins 1 %define build_ldap 1 %endif The problem is that it should have %define build_ldap 0 Samba can currently only support one sam backend, so if you don't use ldap, you will want to rebuild the srpm as follows: rpm --rebuild --without ldap samba-2.2.4-1mdk.src.rpm or wait for -2mdk. Thanks for the reminder. Buchan [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >[root@iq samba]# smbpasswd -L -a junfan >New SMB password: >Retype new SMB password: >fetch_ldap_pw: no ldap secret retrieved! >ldap_connect_system: Failed to retrieve password for from secrets.tdb >fetch_ldap_pw: no ldap secret retrieved! >ldap_connect_system: Failed to retrieve password for from secrets.tdb >Failed to add entry for user junfan. >Failed to modify password entry for user junfan >I don't ldap. >-- >^^^ >Jason Straight >President >BlazeConnect Internet Services >Cheboygan Michigan >www.blazeconnect.net >Phone: 231-597-0376 --- End Message ---
Re: [Samba] Problem with samba 2.2.4 and Mandrake 8.2
»[EMAIL PROTECTED]« sagte am 2002-05-10 um 14:15:39 -0300 : > Hello all, > > I updated my mandrake 8.2 samba from version 2.2.3a to 2.2.4, using mandrake cooker >package, but after the update my The cooker package (2.2.4-1mdk) was built with LDAP support. Thus, it cannot (?) do normal lookups and needs a LDAP. Rebuild the src.rpm with "rpmbuild --without-ldap samba.spec". PS: Your lines are very long and hard to read. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 3 hours 38 minutes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Advice needed about remote colaboration
I am about to start a small business together with two colleagues. We are all located in different parts of the country and is in need of good remote collaboration (we will do major software development). We will use VPN tunnels (over internet) between our computers. Ideally I would like to set up one PDC at one site and backup DC at the two others. All three machines could act as file servers where everyone maintain a CVS repository for the parts of the software he is responsible for. Unfortunately Samba is not able to act as backup domain controller at the moment (at least not the stable release that we probably want to use). What other ways can one use Samba in this scenario? The reason we want to have one server in each site is of course to be able to do work even if the VPN tunnels are down. We want to be able to use the same user account on all the three servers to avoid having to log in more than once... All suggestions and advice are welcome! Regards Trist
Re: [Samba] After reIP, Samba hosts not browsable.
If you are set up to use WINS this is definitely your problem. If possible upgrade your samba systems to 2.2.4. Previous versions had a bug where the would not register with the WINS server if there was an old registration there - even if that was no longer being defended. "Van Sickler, Jim" wrote: > > Did you update the hosts/lmhosts files on > all of the servers & clients? If not, > they still contain the IP info from your > old scheme... > > Jim > > > -Original Message- > > From: C. Bensend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:01 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Samba] After reIP, Samba hosts not browsable. > > > > > > > > Hey folks, > > > > We recently reIP'ed our main office LAN. Ever since > > this was done, none of our Samba hosts are browsable via > > Network Neighborhood. While they are still availible via > > Start -> Run -> \\servername, it's an annoying inconvenience. > > > > Stats: > > > > * PDC and BDC are NT domain controllers > > * Samba hosts are running several versions of Samba, > > from the later 2.0.* releases, through 2.2.1 and > > 2.2.3 > > * Samba hosts include Linux, IRIX, HP-UX, and Solaris > > > > To me, this points at a WINS problem, but deleting the > > machine account from the domain and adding a new one does no > > good. Unfortunately, since WINS is such a black art (at least > > to me), the NT admins can't figure out where the problem lies, > > either. > > > > I doubt if this is a problem with Samba itself, but I'm > > hoping that since we're all here because we're integrating *NIX > > with Windows networks, someone might have run into this problem > > before. > > > > Any help would be much appreciated! If you need further info, > > I'll be happy to provide it. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Benny > > > > > > ~~ > > Always carry a short length of fibre-optic cable. If > > you get lost, then you can drop it on the ground, wait > > ten minutes, and ask the backhoe operator how to get > > back to civilization. -Alan Frame > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- == Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics Networking Engineer 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy MS-510 Strategic Software Organization Mountain View, CA 94043-1351 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 650-933-2177 http://www.sgi.com Fax: 650-932-2177 == -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC
Make sure the clients/server have the server info in their hosts/lmhosts files. Jim > -Original Message- > From: Alex Moen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > Good information, and I will definitely investigate this. However, my > domain right now is in a test situation (working on replacing > an NT 4.0 > domain with this) and is not on our main network which does > consist of Cisco > switches. I have it set up on a small cheapo switch, > isolated from the main > network, where the only thing that is on the switch is the > Samba box, the > W2K box, and the W98 client. Also, DHCP shows no signs of > any problems: the > workstation gets an address with no delay. > > Any other ideas that I can try? > > Thanks!! > > Alex > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Mac > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:58 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > > > > >From: Dirk Allaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: Alex Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > >Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:46:32 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > >Alex Moen wrote: > > >> Wierd thing #1: Windows 98 client will NOT connect on > first attempt: > > >> type in username and password, hit enter, wait 2 minutes, failure > > >> message. Click OK on the failure popup, hit enter again > on the login > > >> dialogue, wait another 2 minutes and client logs in almost > > perfectly (by > > >> almost: trouble with home directory %u thingie). Any ideas? > > >> > > >I am not sure this is a samba issue. I have also seen this once a > > >Windows NT 4 PDC and a somebody reported me this on a > Windows 2000 ADC > > >(always with windows 98). Seemed to have to do with > networking stuff. > > > > > > > > >I the Windows 2000 case, the guy that told me had > contacted CISCO (they > > >were using a CISCO layer 3 switch) and CISCO changed some > stuff on the > > >switch (don't know what). Same scenario for NT 4 case: > Baystack switch, > > >PC's with Accton network card. Changed speed on switches > (half duplex). > > >Problem did not completely disappear but sure improved. > > > > > > This sounds highly likely. The Cisco 'stuff' they changed > was probably > > 'portfast'. > > > > See:- > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html > > > > for an explnation of why it can tkae upto a minute for a > switch to start > > passing packets after the PC has come up. Also some (Cisco > specific) > > steps you can take (with detailed instructions) to reduce > the problem. > > [One of the steps is to twiddle duplex settings, but it's > the very last > > thing to try]. > > > > > >Mac > > Assistant Systems Adminstrator @nibsc.ac.uk > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Work: +44 1707 654753 x285 Everything else: +44 7956 > > 237670 (anytime) > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] After reIP, Samba hosts not browsable.
Did you update the hosts/lmhosts files on all of the servers & clients? If not, they still contain the IP info from your old scheme... Jim > -Original Message- > From: C. Bensend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Samba] After reIP, Samba hosts not browsable. > > > > Hey folks, > > We recently reIP'ed our main office LAN. Ever since > this was done, none of our Samba hosts are browsable via > Network Neighborhood. While they are still availible via > Start -> Run -> \\servername, it's an annoying inconvenience. > > Stats: > > * PDC and BDC are NT domain controllers > * Samba hosts are running several versions of Samba, > from the later 2.0.* releases, through 2.2.1 and > 2.2.3 > * Samba hosts include Linux, IRIX, HP-UX, and Solaris > > To me, this points at a WINS problem, but deleting the > machine account from the domain and adding a new one does no > good. Unfortunately, since WINS is such a black art (at least > to me), the NT admins can't figure out where the problem lies, > either. > > I doubt if this is a problem with Samba itself, but I'm > hoping that since we're all here because we're integrating *NIX > with Windows networks, someone might have run into this problem > before. > > Any help would be much appreciated! If you need further info, > I'll be happy to provide it. > > Thanks! > > Benny > > > ~~ > Always carry a short length of fibre-optic cable. If > you get lost, then you can drop it on the ground, wait > ten minutes, and ask the backhoe operator how to get > back to civilization. -Alan Frame > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] mount -F ?
Just want to mount a disk shared from win2k at solaris8. What file system the shared disk is? I tried ntfs, samfs & cifs, they all not work at solaris.
RE: [Samba] copy a large volume of data from PC to samba server
What kind of clients? If it's NT/Win2k/XP, you could use the "at" service to run a batch file...use robocopy or scopy to do the transfer... Jim -Original Message- From: Tian-xiong Lu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] copy a large volume of data from PC to samba server Hi there, Is there someone over there knows a method or script that can copy a large volume of data (in folders) from PCs to a samba server (suppose there is enough space there)? I know using smbclient or smbtar can backup data on PCs to samba server, but it is written in tar files.I wonder whether this method can handle a large folder, say, in 10GB size. Also, using smbclient with mget and recurse on, one can copy folders from PC to samba server. But in doing so, it is in interactive mode and keeps asking yes/no to continue. Is there a way to get rid of these prompts? Thanks, Tian. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with samba 2.2.4 and Mandrake 8.2
Hello all, I updated my mandrake 8.2 samba from version 2.2.3a to 2.2.4, using mandrake cooker package, but after the update my win98 clients can not logon on the server any more, the clients can't even find the pdc, because i get a big time from the time that the user type his username and pass, and the logon error message. So is this a problem with mandrake's package or the logon procedure (smbpasswd file) has changed from this versions?? Do i have to change something in smb.conf??? My other problem is that i still get errors when mounting windows directories on mandrake 8.2, someone told me this was a problem with 2.4.18 kernel, is it right?? The new kernel from cooker (2.4.18.14mdk) correct this problem?? Tanks very much in advance for the help... Cyro __ Quer ter seu próprio endereço na Internet? Garanta já o seu e ainda ganhe cinco e-mails personalizados. DomíniosBOL - http://dominios.bol.com.br -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Authorizing login per station
Hi, We're using Samba 2.2.2 as a PDC for W2k and XP clients. We have two types of users - "regular" users and "management". The problem I have is to allow only the "management" users to login from certain stations, and deny the login rights to regular users. That is, I need the ability do set per-station login permissions. Is there a way to do this using samba 2.2.x branch, or is it planned for 3.x? If there's a way to do this with 2.2.x, I'd appreciate any pointer to docs or other info on doing it. Cheers, Mario Juric STUDNet Administrator, http://student.fizika.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] issue with long domain names and winbindd_cache
I just started testing 2.2.4 (with winbind) and am looking for advice on a couple of issues. 1. This isn't really a winbind issue, just my *nix ignorance... our domain name is longer than 8 chars. Therefore, the owner & group of every file (ls -l) shows up the same. I have to ls -ln, then grep the results of getent group|passwd to look up the desired number. Not the end of the world, but definitely a pain. Any way for me to format ls or somehow check the owners of a file without going at it this round about way? 2. If the .tdb files in /var/cache/samba get corrupted, I assume that all file ownership will have to be re-applied to match the new SID-id pairs when these tables are re-created. From a backup/restore point of view, will this dir stand on it's own? Can I back it up each night & if something goes wrong, stop winbindd & drop it back in? TIA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] PATCH: Printing from ACT 2000 on Win2k
Apologies to those running ACT 2000 on Win2k. There was an incorrect patch in 2.2.4 that causes printing from the application to sometimes fail. (of course this was broken in 2.2.3a also). An incorrect was put in between 2.2.3a and 2.2.4. If those people having problems with printing from this application could try this patch out and provide feedback it would be much appreciated. The patch can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/jerry/samba-2.2.4-patches/parse_spoolss.patch Sorry for the inconvience. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org "Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] still problems with password-expiration
We have been trying to find a solution to this also. We are getting this message on our w2k samba domain machines after 14 days of being logged on. I haven't tested this long enough to be sure but this might get rid of the message: admin tools ->local security policy -> Local polices-> security options -> prompt user to change password before expiration - set it to zero. Also check the following: admin tools ->local security policy -> Account polices -> Password Policy -> Password Policy -> Maximum Passord Age - I have ours set to 0 William H. Lacy System Administratorwww.vetmed.auburn.edu/~lacywil Computer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine (334)844-3705 From: "Stephan M. Ott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Samba Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 00:16:50 +0200 Subject: [Samba] still problems with password-expiration Hi folks, I knew this was recently discussed but I still couldn't get it to work. I still have the problem that the users on the W2K-Clients get the message about the password going to expire in 5 days when joining the Samba-PDC-Domain. Even if the users change the password, this message keeps coming... I have no idea what to do to avoid this message... Funny thing is, the password DOES NOT expire in 5 days.. only the popus in windows keeps on coming after logon. It always tells about 5 days... every day the same :) Did I miss a posting which told the solution ? Thanks in advynce Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2.2.4: VFS->recycle->sig11
samba-2.2.4 on linux 2.2.x (Red Hat 6.x). No large file enabled.
recicle.c as shipped in 2.2.4 cause sig11.
If I apply this patch that I found on usenet then it's ok
==
--- ./examples/VFS/recycle.c.orig Mon Mar 25 12:56:47 2002
+++ ./examples/VFS/recycle.cFri Apr 12 18:21:54 2002
@@ -239,9 +163,10 @@
}
base = strrchr(fname, '/') + 1;
- if(base == (char*)1)
+ if(base == (char*)1) {
ext = strrchr(fname, '.');
- else
+ base = fname;
+ } else
ext = strrchr(base, '.');
pstrcpy(bin,recycle_bin);
==
However, I'd like to use the enhanced path from here
http://www.elbonia.de/samba/samba_recycle.html
(I have no large file so my SMB_OFF_T is correctly reported as 4).
But it has the very same problem, it sig11 after
pstrcpy(fpath,"/");
pstrcat(fpath,fname);
path = strrchr(fpath+1, '/') + 1 ;
*path='\0';
I tried manually applying the same patch but it does not work.
Can you help me?
Thanks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cannot connect to server upgraded from 2.0.6 to 2.2.4
I recently upgraded a samba server that had been running 2.0.6 to 2.2.4 because I could not authenticate to it from windows XP clients. Unfortunately, I'm not able to connect to to the new installation. Windows reports that '\\[server] is not accessible' and 'The semaphore timeout period has expired' The problem seems to be caused by lock contention on the secrets.tdb file. For whatever reason, any SMB server on campus ends up being probed alot. (I don't know if it's bored students or something that some windows OS's just do, but it happens.) This means that I'm not the only one trying to access my server. In any event it seems as though some of the time, after acquiring a lock on offset 656 of secrets.tdb, an smbd will go and select() on it's network sockets. This means that if the client does not respond immediately, all the other smbd's will, within short order, block on that lock. It is not the case that all the smbd's block holding the lock, but some do. Since I know people will ask, here's my smb.conf: [global] encrypt passwords=yes update encrypted=yes workgroup = CAMPUS null passwords = no load printers = no wins server=wins.andrew.cmu.edu local master = no name resolve order = lmhosts wins host bcast [wincd] path=/usr0/wincd writable=true [tmp] path=/usr0/wintmp writable=true -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Re: Samba wins eWeek and PC Magazine "Innovation in Infrastructure" (i3) award for best Enterprise Software !
It's weird to see money-grubbing on an open-source mailing list. -Original Message- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] so you'll be putting some of the money that is earned from such recognition and increased reputation of samba my way, then, yes, to fund TNG development, yes, without which such an award would not have been possible at this time, yes? great! l. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Disclaimers
Does anyone else find these disclaimers kind of amusing when they're sent to an email list? Especially the "private and confidential" part. ;) -Original Message- -- this message is private, confidential, and is intented for the specified recipients only. if you received in error, altered, deleted, modified, destroyed or interfered with the contents of this message, in whole or in part, please inform the sender (that's me), immediately. if you, the recipient, reply to this message, and do not then receive a response, please consider your reply to have been lost or deliberately destroyed: i *always* acknowledge personal email received. please therefore take appropriate action and use appropriate protocols to ensure effective communication. thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How do i set different permission for a shared directory?
the simpliest way would be to let unix permission system do the job
have only one share : /docusers
each user is connected under its own name (both windows and unix sense)
its home dir is writable for him
all the dirs are readable by the docu group
all you have to do is to set the same primary group for all the users
you would have :
user "paul", primary group "docu", home /docusers/paul
user "peter", primary group "docu", home /docusers/peter
...
drwxr-xr-x root docu /docusers
drwxr-x--- paul docu /docusers/paul
drwxr-x--- peter docu /docusers/peter
...
[Doc_Users]
path = /docusers
writable = yes
on the unix side, samba shares /docusers without any restriction, access
permissions are handled at the os level
on the windows side, users connect to only one share, Doc_Users, in which
they are all able to read all files but can't write only in their own
directory
of course this supposes you have no other constraints that would prohibit
such a configuration...
hth
A 01:18 10/05/02 -0500, vous avez écrit :
>Hello,
>
>Would really appreciate any advise on how the security setting should be
>setup.
>
>I have running Samba ver 2.0.7 on HPUX10.20. Clients run Windows 200 PCs,
>WinNT4 PDC.
>
>"docusers" is the UNIX home directory for document users. their individual
>home dir is created under their user id.
>so, Paul 's home directory structure is :
>
>/docusers/paul
>
>Below is an extract from the smb.conf file.
>[homedir]
> comment = Private Unix file area (%u)
> path = %H
> writeable = Yes
> create mask = 0750
> strict locking = Yes
>
>{Doc_Users]
> path = /docusers
> valid users = @docu
>
>With the above, users with UNIX a/c in the docu group can only read all the
>subdirectories under docusers which is mapped as a dir (eg. L:/Doc_Users) in
>their PC's Windows Explorer .
>
>Now, the requirement is for all users to be able to read all the directories
>under /Doc_Users but be able to write only to his own home directory in the
>same drive mapped (L:).
>
>I have looked at the samba config file via SWAT but is not very sure how to
>make this happens. In the advanced view, there is additional options for a
>write list and read list. The help says this field can include userid or
>group (@docu), but what is the equivilent of the %u - that is the user id?).
>
>
>Really appreciate any advise.
>
>Thank You.
>Michelle
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>
- * - * - * - * - * - * -
Bien sûr que je suis perfectionniste !
Mais ne pourrais-je pas l'être mieux ?
Thierry ITTY
eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] FRANCE
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] LDAP Authentication
Has anyone gotten LDAP authentication to work against the LDAP server for the Lotus Domino Directory? If so would it be possible to se a samble NTF to see how you got this working? I'm having troubles getting the entries returned correctly. # Chris Tooley voice: 512-495-9224x289 Austin Museum of Art pager: 512-613-2603 IT Coordinator 823 Congress Ave Austin, TX 78701 ### -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Oplocks, Oplock_break and request Oplock_break
Hello there. I'm having a few problems using samba 2.2.3a and sharing a paradox database. On the whole everything works fine but (there's always a but), every now and again. a machine's shares will close causing the database to crash (sometimes only that machine) - the other networked machine recover after a few error messages. I guess the easy answer would be to disable oplocks for the share but I'd rather not since it makes maintaining the database much quicker when I use it personally after hours. I've did a little digging the the log files and have came up with the following: there are 3 machines (doris, o-techs & hazel). It appears that Doris had an oplock on a particular file. For some reason (probably the clients hazel or 0-techs), on trying to free the oplock, samba killed the doris SMBD process even though it has locked files. Upon doris reconnecting, these locked files are not reconnected hence screwing up the database on the machine. I am including the relevant sections from the logs below & what machien generated them. Can someone please describe what the error messages actually mean and can anyone offer any sugestions/solutions to the problem. Thanks for any help. Paul Here are the log files: ;-- Doris: win98 [2002/05/10 08:33:23, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(653) doris (192.168.1.43) closed connection to service sophos [2002/05/10 08:33:25, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service netlogon as user doris (uid=519, gid=100) (pid 5301) [2002/05/10 08:33:27, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service sophos as user doris (uid=519, gid=100) (pid 5301) [2002/05/10 08:33:31, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(653) doris (192.168.1.43) closed connection to service netlogon [2002/05/10 08:33:32, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service netlogon as user doris (uid=519, gid=100) (pid 5301) [2002/05/10 08:33:42, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service bdeshare as user doris (uid=519, gid=100) (pid 5301) [2002/05/10 08:33:44, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service orthotic.sys as user doris (uid=519, gid=501) (pid 5301) [2002/05/10 08:33:45, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service orkney.sys as user doris (uid=519, gid=501) (pid 5301) [2002/05/10 08:33:46, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service orthotic.doc as user doris (uid=519, gid=501) (pid 5301) [2002/05/10 08:33:48, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service prosthet.doc as user doris (uid=519, gid=502) (pid 5301) [2002/05/10 08:36:09, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(653) doris (192.168.1.43) closed connection to service netlogon [2002/05/10 10:52:56, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(653) doris (192.168.1.43) closed connection to service prosthet.doc [2002/05/10 10:52:56, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(653) doris (192.168.1.43) closed connection to service orthotic.doc [2002/05/10 10:52:56, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(653) doris (192.168.1.43) closed connection to service orkney.sys [2002/05/10 10:52:56, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(653) doris (192.168.1.43) closed connection to service orthotic.sys [2002/05/10 10:52:56, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(653) doris (192.168.1.43) closed connection to service bdeshare [2002/05/10 10:52:57, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service orthotic.sys as user doris (uid=519, gid=501) (pid 6721) [2002/05/10 10:53:27, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(758) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Success) oplock_break failed for file REF_HOSP.DB (dev = 805, inode = 2540691, file_id = 7). [2002/05/10 10:53:27, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(843) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2002/05/10 10:53:27, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(653) doris (192.168.1.43) closed connection to service orthotic.sys [2002/05/10 10:53:28, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)doris (192.168.1.43) connect to service orthotic.sys as user doris (uid=519, gid=501) (pid 6723) ;-- O_techs: Win95 [2002/05/10 10:53:29, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(981) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 6721 on port 58631 for dev = 805, inode = 2540691, file_id = 7 ;-- Hazel: win95 [2002/05/10 10:53:30, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(981) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 6721 on port 58631 for dev = 805, inode = 2540691, file_id = 7 ;---
[Samba] Samba 2.2.4 on s/390
I have just compiled Samba 2.2.4 with the following configure. ./configure --with-pam --with-winbind I used the same instructions as I did go get Samba 2.2.2 working. I noticed the winbind daemon dies after about a minute. I set the debug to 10 for it and I found some confusing things. Why is it trying to connect to GIGDC1 with a null username? Is this why the connection is refused? <--snip--> [2002/05/10 08:04:13, 5] nsswitch/winbindd_cm.c:cm_open_connection(346) connecting to GIGDC1 from PRINT02P with username []\[] [2002/05/10 08:04:13, 3] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_full_connection(980) Connecting to host=GIGDC1 share=IPC$ [2002/05/10 08:04:13, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(843) Connecting to XXX.XXX.4.3 at port 445 [2002/05/10 08:04:13, 2] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(872) error connecting to XXX.XXX.4.3:445 (Connection refused) <--snip--> . <--snip--> [2002/05/10 08:04:35, 10] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgrent(550) got gid 1 for group f42 [2002/05/10 08:04:35, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(38) === [2002/05/10 08:04:35, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 26422 (2.2.4) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2002/05/10 08:04:35, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) === [2002/05/10 08:04:35, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1092) PANIC: internal error Any help is appreciated!! Josh Konkol, CNE MCSE Senior Network Analyst GuideOne Insurance Mail Stop AB-1 515-267-2427 [EMAIL PROTECTED] .~. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Most common samba uses
Hi Can somebody tell for which purposes samba is mostly used? (Domain Controller, Printserver, etc)? I would need it for a school report. greetings, Albert Dengg -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC
Good information, and I will definitely investigate this. However, my domain right now is in a test situation (working on replacing an NT 4.0 domain with this) and is not on our main network which does consist of Cisco switches. I have it set up on a small cheapo switch, isolated from the main network, where the only thing that is on the switch is the Samba box, the W2K box, and the W98 client. Also, DHCP shows no signs of any problems: the workstation gets an address with no delay. Any other ideas that I can try? Thanks!! Alex > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Mac > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > > > >From: Dirk Allaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Alex Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC > >Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:46:32 +0200 > > > > > > > >Alex Moen wrote: > >> Wierd thing #1: Windows 98 client will NOT connect on first attempt: > >> type in username and password, hit enter, wait 2 minutes, failure > >> message. Click OK on the failure popup, hit enter again on the login > >> dialogue, wait another 2 minutes and client logs in almost > perfectly (by > >> almost: trouble with home directory %u thingie). Any ideas? > >> > >I am not sure this is a samba issue. I have also seen this once a > >Windows NT 4 PDC and a somebody reported me this on a Windows 2000 ADC > >(always with windows 98). Seemed to have to do with networking stuff. > > > > > >I the Windows 2000 case, the guy that told me had contacted CISCO (they > >were using a CISCO layer 3 switch) and CISCO changed some stuff on the > >switch (don't know what). Same scenario for NT 4 case: Baystack switch, > >PC's with Accton network card. Changed speed on switches (half duplex). > >Problem did not completely disappear but sure improved. > > > This sounds highly likely. The Cisco 'stuff' they changed was probably > 'portfast'. > > See:- > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html > > for an explnation of why it can tkae upto a minute for a switch to start > passing packets after the PC has come up. Also some (Cisco specific) > steps you can take (with detailed instructions) to reduce the problem. > [One of the steps is to twiddle duplex settings, but it's the very last > thing to try]. > > >Mac > Assistant Systems Adminstrator @nibsc.ac.uk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Work: +44 1707 654753 x285 Everything else: +44 7956 > 237670 (anytime) > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] After reIP, Samba hosts not browsable.
Hey folks, We recently reIP'ed our main office LAN. Ever since this was done, none of our Samba hosts are browsable via Network Neighborhood. While they are still availible via Start -> Run -> \\servername, it's an annoying inconvenience. Stats: * PDC and BDC are NT domain controllers * Samba hosts are running several versions of Samba, from the later 2.0.* releases, through 2.2.1 and 2.2.3 * Samba hosts include Linux, IRIX, HP-UX, and Solaris To me, this points at a WINS problem, but deleting the machine account from the domain and adding a new one does no good. Unfortunately, since WINS is such a black art (at least to me), the NT admins can't figure out where the problem lies, either. I doubt if this is a problem with Samba itself, but I'm hoping that since we're all here because we're integrating *NIX with Windows networks, someone might have run into this problem before. Any help would be much appreciated! If you need further info, I'll be happy to provide it. Thanks! Benny ~~ Always carry a short length of fibre-optic cable. If you get lost, then you can drop it on the ground, wait ten minutes, and ask the backhoe operator how to get back to civilization. -Alan Frame -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems when compiling samba3.0alpha17
Hi, i have problems with the compiling of samba3.0alpha17. I use the following "configure-script" : -- #!/bin/sh make clean autoconf ./configure \ --with-readline \ --with-acl-support \ --prefix=/usr/local/samba \ --with-smbwrapper \ --with-smbmount \ --with-pam \ --with-pam_smbpass \ --with-ldapsam \ --with-ssl \ --with-tdbsam \ --with-krb5=/usr/local/kerberos \ --with-vfs \ --with-syslog \ --with-libsmbclient \ --with-winbind 2>&1 | tee configure.out - This runs without any errors. Compiling shows the following error message : - Using FLAGS = -DHAVE_CRYPT_DECL -I/usr/local/ssl/include -O -I/usr/local/kerberos/include -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/local/kerberos/include -I. FLAGS32 = -DHAVE_CRYPT_DECL -I/usr/local/ssl/include -O -I/usr/local/kerberos/include -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/local/kerberos/include -I. LIBS = -lssl -lcrypto -lldap -llber -lresolv -ldl -lcrypt -lnsl -lkrb5 -lcom_err -lk5crypto -lkrb5 -lgssapi_krb5 -llber -lldap -lpam -lpopt LDSHFLAGS = -shared -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/usr/local/kerberos/lib -DHAVE_CRYPT_DECL -I/usr/local/ssl/include -O -I/usr/local/kerberos/include LDFLAGS = -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/usr/local/kerberos/lib Compiling lib/util.c In file included from /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/objects.h:960, from /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/evp.h:138, from /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/x509.h:67, from /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/ssl.h:69, from lib/util.c:56: /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:241: parse error before `0x2' /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:242: parse error before `0xa' /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:244: parse error before `0x4' /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:256: parse error before `0x1' /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:348: parse error before `0x1' /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:348: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:348: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:351: parse error before `0x2' /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:354: parse error before `0x4' /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:369: parse error before `}' /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:369: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:370: parse error before `}' /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h:370: warning: data definition has no type or storage class and so on ... - Viewing /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/asn1.h shows (beginning at line 241) : typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_INTEGER; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_ENUMERATED; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_BIT_STRING; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_OCTET_STRING; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_PRINTABLESTRING; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_T61STRING; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_IA5STRING; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_GENERALSTRING; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_UNIVERSALSTRING; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_BMPSTRING; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_UTCTIME; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_TIME; typedef struct asn1_string_st ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME; --- Can anybody tell me what's wrong ? I'm using samba3.0alpha17, Suse Linux 7.1 , Kernel 2.4.18 , openssl 0.9.6c. Thx Harry -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Re: Samba wins eWeek and PC Magazine "Innovation in I nfrastructure" (i3) award for best Enterprise Software !
Title: RE: [Samba] Re: Samba wins eWeek and PC Magazine "Innovation in I nfrastructure" (i3) award for best Enterprise Software ! Luke, You should be able to tell from my signature that I am a UNIX sys admin and an Oracle DBA. I hate MS as much as you do, but I have realized that they control everything, and we are going to have to live with it. I don't think anyone or thing can ever fight them. Hell, Bill snubbs his nose at the US DOJ. You are preaching to the choir. I work in an environment where interns think that MS wrote C & C++. They have never been exposed to anything else. I use every opportunity to bash MS and correct ignorance. The problem I have is that I don't want to see the negative attitude impact a great effort like Samba. Cheers & have a beer. Paul -Original Message- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:35 PM To: Gregory, Paul (PS, GNF, Contractor) Cc: Jeremy Allison; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Samba wins eWeek and PC Magazine "Innovation in I nfrastructure" (i3) award for best Enterprise Software ! On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 05:32:51PM -0400, Gregory, Paul (PS, GNF, Contractor) wrote: > > Luke, hi gregory, how are you? i don't believe we've met. what do yo do for a living? me? oh, i wrote the dce/rpc code which makes up samba's NT domain infrastructure. i wrote a book about it. you can buy it on amazon. it's called "dce/rpc over smb: samba and windows nt domain internals". > What is your problem? it's a very long story. one that i can only assume, by your attitude from your message, that would be totally wasted on you. to give you the benefit of the doubt in that respect, and to answer your question partially: things got really nasty a while back, and a few people got jealous, couldn't handle that i might know a little bit more than they do, and i was under such horrible pressure and extremely nasty circumstances that i couldn't handle either. in all, things went from really good and a lot of fun to extremely nasty, in a very short space of time. i wish that things were better than they were (i do not wish that things were _as_ they were) such that the shit that happened could never ever happen to me OR to anyone else. now it's extremely frustrating because the things that need to happen still have not happened, and the users of microsoft products are lining microsoft's pockets, the US dept of Justice and the EU commission received totally the wrong advice because they simply don't know what's going on, and microsoft sure as hell isn't going to tell them. whenever i explain quite how much is involved, people are shocked, do not believe it could be that difficult, do not believe that it is true, are scared of the repercussions of microsoft - including possibly being simply killed, do not have the time or the money. when in fact, as an example: any company that has more than 500 employees could easily pay for the development of an exchange replacement by writing out the cheque for the license fees to me and/or any good open source dcerpc development team and subsequently never have to pay microsoft exchange license EVER AGAIN. > Sounds like you have a huge chip missing from your shoulder. yes. and no. yes. if you had the same kind of things happen to you as happened to me, you would a) likely also have same b) not be writing me such a blunt email. no. i refuse to give up: i just go away for a while, to recover. > Get over it! well, that is going to take a hell of a lot. are you going to help me to help you? are _you_ going to fund the dcerpc.net projects? l. -- -- this message is private, confidential, and is intented for the specified recipients only. if you received in error, altered, deleted, modified, destroyed or interfered with the contents of this message, in whole or in part, please inform the sender (that's me), immediately. if you, the recipient, reply to this message, and do not then receive a response, please consider your reply to have been lost or deliberately destroyed: i *always* acknowledge personal email received. please therefore take appropriate action and use appropriate protocols to ensure effective communication. thank you.
[Samba] samba and win95
samba 2.2.1 and win98 or me can get a list of users from smb. The problem appears only on computers using win95. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] still problems with password-expiration
Stephan, I have the same problem I don't know what to do to resolve it. I am still in the process of migrating the users to the Samba server so I haven't yet focused on resolving this minor inconvenience. Regards, Alan B. Moote Systems Administrator MARK IV Industries tel: 905.624.7908 fax: 905.625.6197 "Stephan M. Ott" gn.de> cc: Sent by: Subject: [Samba] still problems with password-expiration samba-admin@lists .samba.org 05/09/02 06:16 PM Hi folks, I knew this was recently discussed but I still couldn't get it to work. I still have the problem that the users on the W2K-Clients get the message about the password going to expire in 5 days when joining the Samba-PDC-Domain. Even if the users change the password, this message keeps coming... I have no idea what to do to avoid this message... Funny thing is, the password DOES NOT expire in 5 days.. only the popus in windows keeps on coming after logon. It always tells about 5 days... every day the same :) Did I miss a posting which told the solution ? Thanks in advynce Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Proxy
We use a Samba Proxy Server in a mixed network(Linux and windows 2000).Which commands i have to use to refresh or delete the folder that holds the links to pages we 've visited?
Re: [Samba] samba and win95
Which version of Samba are you running? I believe that userlists for Win9x
systems were not implemented until Samba 2.2.0.
HTH,
David van Geyn
- Original Message -
From: "Cristian Mijea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 7:52 AM
Subject: [Samba] samba and win95
>
> I'm running a smb server on a redhat 7.2 system. everything works just
fine except when I try to share something on a win95 machine (user level).
The win95 machine can't access the list of users provided by samba. ("You
can not view a list of users at this time.")
> Anyone know why?
>
> Tks.!
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba and win95
I'm running a smb server on a redhat 7.2 system. everything works just fine
except when I try to share something on a win95 machine (user level). The win95
machine can't access the list of users provided by samba. ("You can not view a list of
users at this time.")
Anyone know why?
Tks.!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] What's the newest samba-tng ?
Hi samba-tng has it's one mail list at [EMAIL PROTECTED], where you should direct your question to, since they probably know it better then anybody else. Rasmus At 11:54 10-05-2002 +0200, Harry Rüter wrote: >Hi everybody, > >What's the newest samba-tng and where can i >download it ? > >thanks from germany > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC
>From: Dirk Allaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Alex Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC >Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:46:32 +0200 > > > >Alex Moen wrote: >> Wierd thing #1: Windows 98 client will NOT connect on first attempt: >> type in username and password, hit enter, wait 2 minutes, failure >> message. Click OK on the failure popup, hit enter again on the login >> dialogue, wait another 2 minutes and client logs in almost perfectly (by >> almost: trouble with home directory %u thingie). Any ideas? >> >I am not sure this is a samba issue. I have also seen this once a >Windows NT 4 PDC and a somebody reported me this on a Windows 2000 ADC >(always with windows 98). Seemed to have to do with networking stuff. > > >I the Windows 2000 case, the guy that told me had contacted CISCO (they >were using a CISCO layer 3 switch) and CISCO changed some stuff on the >switch (don't know what). Same scenario for NT 4 case: Baystack switch, >PC's with Accton network card. Changed speed on switches (half duplex). >Problem did not completely disappear but sure improved. This sounds highly likely. The Cisco 'stuff' they changed was probably 'portfast'. See:- http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html for an explnation of why it can tkae upto a minute for a switch to start passing packets after the PC has come up. Also some (Cisco specific) steps you can take (with detailed instructions) to reduce the problem. [One of the steps is to twiddle duplex settings, but it's the very last thing to try]. Mac Assistant Systems Adminstrator @nibsc.ac.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: +44 1707 654753 x285 Everything else: +44 7956 237670 (anytime) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] What's the newest samba-tng ?
Hi everybody, What's the newest samba-tng and where can i download it ? thanks from germany -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba 2.2.4 and SCO Openserver 5.0.6
Title: [Samba] Samba 2.2.4 and SCO Openserver 5.0.6 Hi Dirk, I have disables lines 664 to 668 in Makefile. When it I run "make" I still get this error "Compiling smbd/server.cinclude/includes.h, line 855:error: identifier redeclared: initgroups*** Error code 1 (bu21)" I have run configure with and without winbind and get the same error above. -Original Message-From: Dirk ALLAERT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 09 May 2002 19:32To: Michael Charles; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba 2.2.4 and SCO Openserver 5.0.6 makeline 664: Syntax error. I also got this error on Openserver. I just deleted line 664 to 668 in the Makefile and it worked fine. I guess the Openserver make is just too ancient ? : $(WINBIND_NSS_PICOBJS) @echo "Linking $@" @$(SHLD) -shared -o $@ $(WINBIND_NSS_PICOBJS) \ #`basename $@` I could be wrong but AFAIK Openserver does not not support NSS so winbind will not work. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Michael Charles Verzonden: do 9/05/2002 14:29 Aan: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' CC: Onderwerp: [Samba] Samba 2.2.4 and SCO Openserver 5.0.6 I have problems installing the latest release of Samba on Caldera (SCO)Openserver 5.0.6I have downloaded the source and ran "./configure" fine. I get an error "line 664: Syntax error " when I run "make". If I run " ./configure--with-winbind", then run "make", I get the error "Compiling smbd/server.cinclude/includes.h, line 885:error: identifier redeclared: initgroups*** Error code 1 (bu21)"I have installed the same release on SCO Unixware 7.1.0 by running"./configure --with-winbind", " make" and finally "make install". Thisworks.Regards,Michael--To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read theinstructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Win2k won't join Samba-Domain
Hallo all, I have got a problem with samba (2.2.3a, 2.2.4 and CVS-Version). It's inpossible to let a Win2K (SP1) join my Samba-Domain. The error is that the cred(irials?)s are wrong. The remove all the *.tdb (in the lock-dir) and created the computer-account new, with no success. My smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from k6.privat.de (192.168.201.15) # Date: 2002/05/07 18:37:33 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = EDUC netbios name = BRAIN encrypt passwords = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*password* "%n\n" *Re-enter*new*password* "%n\n" *LDAP *password*information*changed*for* unix password sync = Yes log level = 36 announce version = 5.0 time server = Yes domain admin group = root logon path = \\brain\%U\profile logon drive = H: logon home = \\brain\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 65 lm announce = True lm interval = 10 preferred master = True domain master = True wins support = Yes ldap server = 192.168.201.10 ldap suffix = "dc=privat,dc=de" ldap admin dn = "uid=admin,ou=Sysusers,ou=NSS,dc=privat,dc=de" passdb backend = ldapsam ldap ssl = true admin users = root, administrator nt acl support = No printing = cups [homes] comment = home read only = No browseable = No [z] path = / [data] path = /data read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /tmp create mask = 0700 guest ok = Yes printable = Yes browseable = No [NETLOGON] path = /usr/lib/samba/netlogon [profiles] path = /usr/lib/samba/ntprofile read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 -- Jens Reimann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Win98 join a PDC
Alex Moen wrote: > OK... this has probably been asked in the past, but until there is a > decent archive it's impossible to tell :) > > Just set up a 2.2.4 PDC / Solaris 8 / E-250. > > Wierd thing #1: Windows 98 client will NOT connect on first attempt: > type in username and password, hit enter, wait 2 minutes, failure > message. Click OK on the failure popup, hit enter again on the login > dialogue, wait another 2 minutes and client logs in almost perfectly (by > almost: trouble with home directory %u thingie). Any ideas? > I am not sure this is a samba issue. I have also seen this once a Windows NT 4 PDC and a somebody reported me this on a Windows 2000 ADC (always with windows 98). Seemed to have to do with networking stuff. I the Windows 2000 case, the guy that told me had contacted CISCO (they were using a CISCO layer 3 switch) and CISCO changed some stuff on the switch (don't know what). Same scenario for NT 4 case: Baystack switch, PC's with Accton network card. Changed speed on switches (half duplex). Problem did not completely disappear but sure improved. > Wierd thing #2: Win2K server, no AD, no BDC. Just wanna join the > domain so that I can use terminal server. Asking for a username and > password. The only reference that I have found in any of the > documentation is how you must use a "Samba Administrator" account to > authenticate the machine, but there is no docs that explain WHAT a > "Samba Administrator" account is, or how to make one. try root ? > > Any help will be GREATLY appreciated!!! > > Thanks in advance! > > * > Alex Moen > Operations Technology Specialist > 701-662-6481 > 800-880-4213 > * > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba and win95
I'm running a smb server on a redhat 7.2 system. everything works just fine
except when I try to share something on a win95 machine (user level). The win95
machine can't access the list of users provided by samba. ("You can not view a list of
users at this time.")
Anyone know why?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] somebody please help
Dear all, I have a serious problem that I can't rectify. My smb.conf is as follows. I use Solaris 2.6 on SPARC # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SOME_DOMAIN netbios name = 220R server string = Samba For Backup On Solaris security = SERVER encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes obey pam restrictions = Yes password server = * 10.2.240.251 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 50 preferred master = False local master = No domain master = False dns proxy = No wins server = 10.2.240.251 winbind uid = 1-2 winbind gid = 1-2 template homedir = /samba/shares/%D/%U template shell = /bin/sh guest account = ftp The samba server is shown in the network neighborhood. When security is set to domain users are prompted for the password that does not happen if security is set to server. Log.winbind [2002/05/09 12:54:13, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(157) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2002/05/09 12:54:13, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(74) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2002/05/09 12:54:13, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1336) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine SOMEMASTER. Error was : NT_STATUS_OK. [2002/05/09 12:54:13, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1554) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2002/05/09 13:14:39, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(157) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2002/05/09 13:14:39, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(74) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2002/05/09 13:14:39, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_cm.c:cm_get_netlogon_cli(692) error connecting to domain password server: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2002/05/09 13:21:43, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(157) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2002/05/09 13:21:43, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(74) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2002/05/09 13:21:43, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_cm.c:cm_get_netlogon_cli(692) error connecting to domain password server: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED log.smbd 2002/05/10 12:30:39, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(74) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2002/05/10 12:30:39, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1336) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine SOMEMASTER. Error was : NT_STATUS_OK. [2002/05/10 12:30:39, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(157) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2002/05/10 12:30:39, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(74) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2002/05/10 12:30:39, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1336) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine SOMEMASTER. Error was : NT_STATUS_OK. [2002/05/10 12:30:39, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1554) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2002/05/10 12:32:29, 0] smbd/server.c:main(698) smbd version 2.2.3a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2002 [2002/05/10 12:32:29, 0] lib/pidfile.c:pidfile_create(86) ERROR: smbd is already running. File /usr/local/samba/var/locks/smbd.pid exists and process id 1204 is running. [2002/05/10 12:32:40, 0] smbd/server.c:main(698) smbd version 2.2.3a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2002 Also when I do a wbinfo ?t it says Secret is bad 0xc022 wbinfo ?a output is wbinfo -a SOME_DOMAIN\\guest%password plaintext password authentication failed Could not authenticate user SOME_DOMAIN\guest%password with plaintext password challenge/response password authentication failed Could not authenticate user SOME_DOMAIN\guest%password with challenge/response and winbind in debug mode presents [ 1370]: check machine account resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name SOMEMASTER<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name SOMEMASTER<0x20> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name SOMEMASTER<0x20> resolve_wins: WINS server == <10.2.240.251> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.2.240.251 ( 10.2.240.251 ) IPC$ connections done anonymously Connecting to 10.2.240.251 at port 445 error connecting to 10.2.240.251:445 (Connection refused) Connecting to 10.2.240.251 at port 139 cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed error connecting to domain password server: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED could not open handle to NETLOGON pipe To overcome this I did Removed the machine from the server manager(PDC is win Nt4) Stopped all samba daemons Removed all files in the private dir Created a computer account using useradd ?s /bin/fa
[Samba] The status of Active Directory support in Samba
Hi, Sorry if I missed some documentation on this. I would like to know if at present I can use samba as an active directory service and also if this is implemented on top of LDAP so enabling me to use LDAP tools to query this server in addition to win2k/xp clients? Any pointers or additional documentation would be much appreciated. Many thanks Andy Crichton __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The contents are confidential and may be privileged. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the sender and may not reflect the views or opinions of the company and the company accepts no liability in respect thereof. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
