[Samba] samba pdc won't work with other samba file servers

2002-05-23 Thread plug bert

Hello!

   A good day to you all. the user accounts i set up
on my samba pdc can't seem to access any shares set up
on another samba file server. the pdc is has security
= user, and the file server has security = server and
password server = . i am testing the setup
using a w2k pro box. i have created the appropriate
machine accounts for the client and the file server,
btw(passwd and smbpasswd)


   The logs seem to indicate that the user i logged on
as keeps on getting logged on as guest. While i can
log on, i can't seem to access the shares. 

   My guess is that somehow the pdc isn't
authenticating the user, and that the samba file
server
is defaulting to security = user. As to why this is
happening still escapes me though. Comments?





__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Problem compiling samba 2.2.4 with SCO Open Server 3.0, Unix3.2.v4.2

2002-05-23 Thread Walter Willmertinger

This path was not tested and so we have a lot of errors for this old SCO 
system.
The first error is when doing a ./configure, we get an error message at the 
end of the configure script:
sed: command garbled ... with some cryptic sed commands.
configure: creating ./config.status
sed: command garbled: 
s,^[  ]*#[]*define[   ][  ]*\(\([^
(][^(]*\)([^)]*)\)[ ]*\(.*\)$,${ac_dA}\2${ac_dB}\1${ac_dC}\3${a 
(][^(]*\)([^)]*)\)[ 
]*\(.*\)$,${ac_dA}\2${ac_dB}\1${ac_dC}\3${ac_dD}
,gp

The resulting makefile has an error in line 664, the definition of
nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so: $(WINBIND_NSS_PICOBJS)
starts with no text before the ":"

We changed the resulting makefile manually and got the next error:
in the file include/includes.h (line 453) there is a typing error in the 
definition of int32.
In the case that no option was valid before, the macro "uint32" is defined 
by int, but not "int32"

But also this correction leads only to the next compile error with the 
typedef timeval missing.

Did anyone do already the hard work to compile samba on this old system.
Our last working version was 2.0.7. But since this release there have been 
a lot of changes to the sama source code. 


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Mangled Names of Long File Name with 2.2.4

2002-05-23 Thread Pascal Schelcher

Hello,

I have got samba-2.2.4 installed.
The Documentation of Samba says that the probability of a clash of mangled
names is 1/1300. But here is an output of a dir command on DOS :
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K6.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#033#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K4.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#002#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K8.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#003#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JN.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#004#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JR.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#005#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JV.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#006#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JZ.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#007#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~KS.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#008#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~KW.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#009#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~J$.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#010#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K2.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#011#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K6.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#012#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~KA.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#013#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JP.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#014#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JT.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#015#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JX.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#016#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~J-.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#017#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~KU.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#018#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~KY.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#019#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K0.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#020#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~J@.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#021#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K8.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#022#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K4.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#023#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JR.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#024#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JN.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#025#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JZ.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#026#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~JV.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#027#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~KW.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#028#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~KS.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#029#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K2.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#030#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~J$.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#031#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~KA.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#032#01.TXT
l:/test/text/2002/04/23/test2/LAGEF~K0.TXT - L AGEFI#230402#001#01.TXT
We can see that files named "L AGEFI#230402#033#01.TXT" and "L
AGEFI#230402#012#01.TXT" have same mangled name : "LAGEF~K6.TXT".

So what can I do to solve problem ?

Thanks.

Pascal Schelcher.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] SMB Connection failed

2002-05-23 Thread Abdij Bhat

Hi,
 I get the following error when i try to mount a windows share on my
embedded target 
>>93: session setup failed: SUCCESS - 0
>>SMB connection failed.

 I am using the command 
>>smbmount //win-mac-netbios-name/share-name /mnt/sambashare
 Samba then complains about some codepages missing, but moves on and prompts
me the password. I have set no password on the windows machine for the
"guest" account. [I have pasted the smb.conf used in both the server and
client below ( i use the same smb.conf ).]
 I leave the password empty and press enter. It then gives the above
mentioned errors.

 This was working fine a few weeks ago when we were using the full blown
Red-Hat distribution built for our embedded target (MIPS). Now we have
scaled down the linux to minimal files ( to fit to our flash ) and i beleive
something is missing; which causes the problem. 

 Can somebody please help me resolve this.

Thanks and Regards,
Abdij


** smb.conf *

; Configuration file for smbd.
;

; For the format of this file and comprehensive descriptions of all the
; configuration option, please refer to the man page for smb.conf(5).

[global]
;   set the work group name
workgroup = DOMAIN

;   set machine name
netbios name = Sambabu

;   set description field
server string = Sambabu Server


;   set a separate log file for each client
log file = /usr/local/samba/log.%m

;   set lock directory
lock directory = /var/lock/samba

;   set share mode
share modes = yes

;   allow guests
guest ok = yes

[home]
comment = Home Directory

;   set path
path = /home

;   make browsable
browseable = yes

;   allow guests
guest ok = yes

;   make writable
read only = no

;   set create mode
create mode = 0750

[public]
comment = Publicaly Shared Data

;   set the path
path = /home/abdij/downloads

;   make public
public = yes

;   make writable
writable = yes

;   make unprintable
printable = no


[tmp]
comment = Temporary file space

;   set path
path = /tmp

;   make writable
read only = no

;   make public
public = yes


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] SMB Connection failed

2002-05-23 Thread Roland Schmid

Hello,

as far as I know the command to mount an SMB Filesystem is:
mount -t smbfs -o username=YOURNAME,password=pass  //server/sharename/
/folder/pointer

YOURNAME and pass must be an Account on the Windows OS, who has Admin-Rights
On the UNIX Side you need to be root to execute the command

Hope this helps,

Best regards,
Roland


>  Can somebody please help me resolve this.

> Thanks and Regards,
> Abdij


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Re: SMB Connection failed

2002-05-23 Thread Pranay Tembhekar

Hi,

First thing u've to do is check the username & password on the windows
machine by which u usually do a login. Try to create same account in ur Samba
machine with same passwd. Login from the new username & passwd. & then  try to
give the same command if it asks for the passwd give the same passwd. If it
fails try to do it with "su".

Regards,

Pranay





Abdij Bhat wrote:

> Hi,
>  I get the following error when i try to mount a windows share on my
> embedded target
> >>93: session setup failed: SUCCESS - 0
> >>SMB connection failed.
>
>  I am using the command
> >>smbmount //win-mac-netbios-name/share-name /mnt/sambashare
>  Samba then complains about some codepages missing, but moves on and prompts
> me the password. I have set no password on the windows machine for the
> "guest" account. [I have pasted the smb.conf used in both the server and
> client below ( i use the same smb.conf ).]
>  I leave the password empty and press enter. It then gives the above
> mentioned errors.
>
>  This was working fine a few weeks ago when we were using the full blown
> Red-Hat distribution built for our embedded target (MIPS). Now we have
> scaled down the linux to minimal files ( to fit to our flash ) and i beleive
> something is missing; which causes the problem.
>
>  Can somebody please help me resolve this.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Abdij
>
> ** smb.conf *
>
> ; Configuration file for smbd.
> ;
> 
> ; For the format of this file and comprehensive descriptions of all the
> ; configuration option, please refer to the man page for smb.conf(5).
>
> [global]
> ;   set the work group name
> workgroup = DOMAIN
>
> ;   set machine name
> netbios name = Sambabu
>
> ;   set description field
> server string = Sambabu Server
>
> ;   set a separate log file for each client
> log file = /usr/local/samba/log.%m
>
> ;   set lock directory
> lock directory = /var/lock/samba
>
> ;   set share mode
> share modes = yes
>
> ;   allow guests
> guest ok = yes
>
> [home]
> comment = Home Directory
>
> ;   set path
> path = /home
>
> ;   make browsable
> browseable = yes
>
> ;   allow guests
> guest ok = yes
>
> ;   make writable
> read only = no
>
> ;   set create mode
> create mode = 0750
>
> [public]
> comment = Publicaly Shared Data
>
> ;   set the path
> path = /home/abdij/downloads
>
> ;   make public
> public = yes
>
> ;   make writable
> writable = yes
>
> ;   make unprintable
> printable = no
>
> [tmp]
> comment = Temporary file space
>
> ;   set path
> path = /tmp
>
> ;   make writable
> read only = no
>
> ;   make public
> public = yes


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] samba fileserver

2002-05-23 Thread Kristyan Osborne

you will have to recompile samba with the option --with-quota so that users can see 
their quota on a windoz box. As for configuration to smb.conf non is needed.

Cheers

-
Kristyan Osborne IT Technician
Longhill High School
01273 391672

--
Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows.
Win95:   A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an
 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a
 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition.


-Original Message-
From: Dar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 14:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] samba fileserver


Hi,
I am running samba as pdc on my network, now i want to configure it as a fileserver 
with 50Mb quota for each user. Do let me know do i have to add a new share or wot 
changes do i hav to make in my configuration file.

Thanks

Dar.



--
Go Net

The right way to go ...

http://www.go.net.pk




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] $SMBDOPTIONS in xinetd.conf

2002-05-23 Thread hans schneidhofer

hi list,

got a little trouble of understanding, how to convert from old 
/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb to the new version redhat 7.1

this is, what I should know :
the old version looks like this :

# see how we were called 
case "$1" in
start)
if [ -s /etc/smb.conf ]; then 
echo -n "starting $ident:
start-stop-daemon -S -n $Name1 -x $DAEMON1 - -D -d 2
start-stop-daemon -S -n $Name2 -x $DAEMON2 - -D -d 2 \
-G musik -n winlux
echo "."

here comes the rest .

now the new RH 7.1 version :
start() {
KIND="SMB"
echo -n $"Starting $KIND services: "
daemon smbd $SMBDOPTIONS
RETVAL=$?
echo 
KIND="NMB"
echo -n $"Starting $KIND services: "
daemon nmbd $NMBDOPTIONS
RETVAL2=$?

and so on 

now : whre is optionsfiled or whre can I declare "my options like 
"-D -d 2 \
-G musik -n winlux"

havn't found anything in the docs, so I would be very happy to get some help 
from this list.

thanks to all from you 
hans schneidhofer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Problem with logon script

2002-05-23 Thread Harry Rüter

Hi,

i'm having a little problem with the logon-script feature.

I work with a Winxx-network with Win2k and Win98-Clients.
The fileserver is samba 2.2.4 on LINUX,Kernel 2.4.18.

For debuging-purposes i wrote a pause command into the
logon-script.

A realized that there is an error message (in german, i try
to translate) :

---
The local device is already used

System error 85 .
Help is available with the command NET HELPMSG 2250 .
---

Here is the part from my script :


@SET SERVER=MYSERVER

:Win2k
rem echo In Win2k
@NET TIME \\%Server% /SET /YES   > nul
@net use u: \\%Server%\homepages > nul
@net use v: \\%Server%\homes > nul
@net use w: \\%Server%\fax   > nul
@net use x: \\%Server%\data  > nul
@if  not "%USEROFCURRENTSERVICE%" == "Administrator" goto
win2kend
@net use y: \\%Server%\rootdir$   > nul
:win2kend
rem @net use /PERSISTENT:NO > nul
@net use z: /delete > nul
@goto end
-

The client-OS on which the error occurs is Win2k.

Windows seems to mount the drives itself befor the
logon script is started.

How can i solute this problem ?


thanks Harry


By the way , the logon-script is generated with a
shell-script using the
root preexec statement.

So i can parse each statevar like USEROFCURRENTSERVICE ( =
%u) to the logon-script.
This works and has nothing to do with the problem,
just an information for you ..

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Re: Sun finally ships Samba as standard on Solaris 9

2002-05-23 Thread Neil Hoggarth

On Wed, 22 May 2002, Jeremy Allison wrote:

> Well you won't find them shouting about it, but if you dig down
> in their web pages on Solaris 9 you'll find this :
>
> "Common Linux applications, such as Samba, Apache, Linux (GNU) commands,
> etc., are included in the Solaris 9 Operating Environment.

Does anyone know yet which Samba version Sun are using for this?

Regards,
-- 
Neil Hoggarth Departmental Computer Officer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   Laboratory of Physiology
http://www.physiol.ox.ac.uk/~njh/  University of Oxford, UK



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re:[Samba] Problem with logon script

2002-05-23 Thread Oliver Six

Harry Rüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23.05.2002 13:02:10:

>
>Hi,
>
>i'm having a little problem with the logon-script feature.
>
>I work with a Winxx-network with Win2k and Win98-Clients.
>The fileserver is samba 2.2.4 on LINUX,Kernel 2.4.18.
>
>For debuging-purposes i wrote a pause command into the
>logon-script.
>
>A realized that there is an error message (in german, i try
>to translate) :
>
>---
>The local device is already used
>
>System error 85 .
>Help is available with the command NET HELPMSG 2250 .
>---
>
>Here is the part from my script :
>
>
>@SET SERVER=MYSERVER
>
>:Win2k
>rem echo In Win2k
>@NET TIME \\%Server% /SET /YES   > nul
>@net use u: \\%Server%\homepages > nul
>@net use v: \\%Server%\homes > nul
>@net use w: \\%Server%\fax   > nul
>@net use x: \\%Server%\data  > nul
>@if  not "%USEROFCURRENTSERVICE%" == "Administrator" goto
>win2kend
>@net use y: \\%Server%\rootdir$   > nul
>:win2kend
>rem @net use /PERSISTENT:NO > nul
>@net use z: /delete > nul
>@goto end
>-
>
>The client-OS on which the error occurs is Win2k.
>
>Windows seems to mount the drives itself befor the
>logon script is started.
>
>How can i solute this problem ?
>
>
>thanks Harry
>
>
>By the way , the logon-script is generated with a
>shell-script using the
>root preexec statement.
>
>So i can parse each statevar like USEROFCURRENTSERVICE ( =
>%u) to the logon-script.
>This works and has nothing to do with the problem,
>just an information for you ..
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Hi Harry,

AFAIK: windows maps drive y: or z: to the logon service to execute the logon 
script. 

Ciao Oliver
--
Good programming is 40% experience, 30% skill, 20% RTFM, 10% caffeine, and 5% 
attention to detail. 

Oliver Six, CEO
CAHOS GmbH, Cimbernstr. 51, Germany 81377 Muenchen
Phone +49 89 71 01 93 41,  Fax +49 89 71 01 93 42


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] $SMBDOPTIONS in xinetd.conf

2002-05-23 Thread Jelmer Vernooij

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

> now the new RH 7.1 version :
> start()   {
>   KIND="SMB"
>   echo -n $"Starting $KIND services: "
>   daemon smbd $SMBDOPTIONS
>   RETVAL=$?
>   echo 
>   KIND="NMB"
>   echo -n $"Starting $KIND services: "
>   daemon nmbd $NMBDOPTIONS
>   RETVAL2=$?

> and so on 

> now : whre is optionsfiled or whre can I declare "my options like 
> "-D -d 2 \
> -G musik -n winlux"

> havn't found anything in the docs, so I would be very happy to get some help 
> from this list.
This is actually more a distribution-specific problem and belongs on
the redhat and not on the samba lists. But I'll give it a try anyway:

You could set SMBDOPTIONS and NMBDOPTIONS on top of the init script, like:
SMBDOPTIONS="-D -d 2 -G musik -n winlux"
NMBDOPTIONS="-D -d 2 -G musik -n winlux"

You might also want to check the names of files the init script tries
to include. There might be some SMBDOPTIONS variable defined there
already.

Jelmer

- -- 
Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://nl.linux.org/~jelmer/
Development And Underdevelopment: http://library.thinkquest.org/C0110231/
 13:51:20 up 5 days, 13:05, 12 users,  load average: 4.66, 4.29, 3.99
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE87NiZPa9Uoh7vUnYRAn23AKCOYhBjaEwBtCrm6CMM3q/FkiehZwCgjbTM
KzOsSXyHAP49lkiSK61R5Ng=
=nZ2b
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] alternate data streams problem

2002-05-23 Thread Shai
Title: alternate data streams problem






hi all,

I'm running into a strange problem:

I'm running a samba 2.2.3a server on a linux machine.

one win2k client is saving a directory full of pictures to this server but all pictures files (jpg, tif...) are saved as three files, two of the as the alternate data streams files of the original. it looks like this:

Pb060009.jpg        (the original file)

Pb060009.jpg:{4c8cc155-6c1e-11d1-8e41-00c04fb9386d}:$DATA

Pb060009.jpg:Q30lsldxJoudresxAaaqpcawXc:$DATA

this happened only to two clients and only with pictures.

other machine save pics normally without the alternate data streams being seen.

does anyone have a clue?





Re: [Samba] Re: Sun finally ships Samba as standard on Solaris 9

2002-05-23 Thread Steve Kennedy

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:18:36PM +0100, Neil Hoggarth wrote:

> On Wed, 22 May 2002, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > Well you won't find them shouting about it, but if you dig down
> > in their web pages on Solaris 9 you'll find this :
> > "Common Linux applications, such as Samba, Apache, Linux (GNU) commands,
> > etc., are included in the Solaris 9 Operating Environment.
> Does anyone know yet which Samba version Sun are using for this?

It's all on their website (under Sun Freeware companion CD or similar),
Samba is under "supported" software, and it's 2.2.2

http://wwws.sun.com/software/solaris/freeware/index.html

Steve

-- 
home [EMAIL PROTECTED]Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Pk, London NW3 4LU
work [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +44-(0)207 483 1169FAX +44-(0)207 483 2455
www  http://www.gbnet.net/  Personal DFAX +44 (0)870 1600 842   (fax to email)
bits [EMAIL PROTECTED]   mob +44(0)7775755503 Epage steve-pager at gbnet.net

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Fwd: [Samba] samba pdc won't work with other samba file servers

2002-05-23 Thread plug bert

Hello!

   i just took a closer look at log.smbd; it seems
there is no problem with the file server passing on
the authentication to the pdc, but the pdc logs say
that the user's nt password or NTLM password doesn't
match -- quite strange, considering i was able to log
on and access a share on the pdc.

   Comments?




===
Hello!

   A good day to you all. the user accounts i set up
on my samba pdc can't seem to access any shares set up
on another samba file server. the pdc is has security
= user, and the file server has security = server and
password server = . i am testing the setup
using a w2k pro box. i have created the appropriate
machine accounts for the client and the file server,
btw(passwd and smbpasswd)


   The logs seem to indicate that the user i logged on
as keeps on getting logged on as guest. While i can
log on, i can't seem to access the shares. 

   My guess is that somehow the pdc isn't
authenticating the user, and that the samba file
server
is defaulting to security = user. As to why this is
happening still escapes me though. Comments?




Note: forwarded message attached.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
--- Begin Message ---

Hello!

   A good day to you all. the user accounts i set up
on my samba pdc can't seem to access any shares set up
on another samba file server. the pdc is has security
= user, and the file server has security = server and
password server = . i am testing the setup
using a w2k pro box. i have created the appropriate
machine accounts for the client and the file server,
btw(passwd and smbpasswd)


   The logs seem to indicate that the user i logged on
as keeps on getting logged on as guest. While i can
log on, i can't seem to access the shares. 

   My guess is that somehow the pdc isn't
authenticating the user, and that the samba file
server
is defaulting to security = user. As to why this is
happening still escapes me though. Comments?





__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--- End Message ---


Fwd: [Samba] samba pdc won't work with other samba file servers

2002-05-23 Thread plug bert

Hello!

   i just took a closer look at log.smbd; it seems
there is no problem with the file server passing on
the authentication to the pdc, but the pdc logs say
that the user's nt password or NTLM password doesn't
match -- quite strange, considering i was able to log
on and access a share on the pdc.

   Comments?




===
Hello!

   A good day to you all. the user accounts i set up
on my samba pdc can't seem to access any shares set up
on another samba file server. the pdc is has security
= user, and the file server has security = server and
password server = . i am testing the setup
using a w2k pro box. i have created the appropriate
machine accounts for the client and the file server,
btw(passwd and smbpasswd)


   The logs seem to indicate that the user i logged on
as keeps on getting logged on as guest. While i can
log on, i can't seem to access the shares. 

   My guess is that somehow the pdc isn't
authenticating the user, and that the samba file
server
is defaulting to security = user. As to why this is
happening still escapes me though. Comments?




Note: forwarded message attached.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
--- Begin Message ---

Hello!

   A good day to you all. the user accounts i set up
on my samba pdc can't seem to access any shares set up
on another samba file server. the pdc is has security
= user, and the file server has security = server and
password server = . i am testing the setup
using a w2k pro box. i have created the appropriate
machine accounts for the client and the file server,
btw(passwd and smbpasswd)


   The logs seem to indicate that the user i logged on
as keeps on getting logged on as guest. While i can
log on, i can't seem to access the shares. 

   My guess is that somehow the pdc isn't
authenticating the user, and that the samba file
server
is defaulting to security = user. As to why this is
happening still escapes me though. Comments?





__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--- End Message ---


RE: [Samba] alternate data streams problem

2002-05-23 Thread MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)

Hi Shai,
Check out MS article Q319300.  Since samba advertises it's fs by default as
ntfs, this could be a problem with the machines you are seeing this on
having indexing on:
 
"Windows 2000 Content Indexing Server may add additional kmsearchhit0data
kmsearchhit1streams to image
files (.jpg, .gif, .bmp) that are stored on NTFS volumes.





CAUSE



By default, a filter driver is installed that creates thumbnails of images.
These thumbnails are stored in an kmsearchhit2alternate kmsearchhit3data
kmsearchhit4stream that is called
?Q30lsldxJoudresxAaaqpcawXc."
 
See the q article for info on a workaround...
 
Hope this helps,
Don



-Original Message-
From: Shai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] alternate data streams problem



hi all,

I'm running into a strange problem:

I'm running a samba 2.2.3a server on a linux machine.

one win2k client is saving a directory full of pictures to this server but
all pictures files (jpg, tif...) are saved as three files, two of the as the
alternate data streams files of the original. it looks like this:

Pb060009.jpg(the original file)

Pb060009.jpg:{4c8cc155-6c1e-11d1-8e41-00c04fb9386d}:$DATA

Pb060009.jpg:Q30lsldxJoudresxAaaqpcawXc:$DATA

this happened only to two clients and only with pictures.

other machine save pics normally without the alternate data streams being
seen.

does anyone have a clue?


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Problem with logon script

2002-05-23 Thread Harry Rüter

Hi,

Oliver Six wrote:
> 
> Harry Rüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23.05.2002 13:02:10:
> 
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >i'm having a little problem with the logon-script feature.
> >
> >I work with a Winxx-network with Win2k and Win98-Clients.
> >The fileserver is samba 2.2.4 on LINUX,Kernel 2.4.18.
> >
> >For debuging-purposes i wrote a pause command into the
> >logon-script.
> >
> >A realized that there is an error message (in german, i try
> >to translate) :
> >
> >---
> >The local device is already used
> >
> >System error 85 .
> >Help is available with the command NET HELPMSG 2250 .
> >---
> >
> >Here is the part from my script :
> >
> >
> >@SET SERVER=MYSERVER
> >
> >:Win2k
> >rem echo In Win2k
> >@NET TIME \\%Server% /SET /YES   > nul
> >@net use u: \\%Server%\homepages > nul
> >@net use v: \\%Server%\homes > nul
> >@net use w: \\%Server%\fax   > nul
> >@net use x: \\%Server%\data  > nul
> >@if  not "%USEROFCURRENTSERVICE%" == "Administrator" goto
> >win2kend
> >@net use y: \\%Server%\rootdir$   > nul
> >:win2kend
> >rem @net use /PERSISTENT:NO > nul
> >@net use z: /delete > nul
> >@goto end
> >-
> >
> >The client-OS on which the error occurs is Win2k.
> >
> >Windows seems to mount the drives itself befor the
> >logon script is started.
> >
> >How can i solute this problem ?
> >
> >
> >thanks Harry
> >
> >
> >By the way , the logon-script is generated with a
> >shell-script using the
> >root preexec statement.
> >
> >So i can parse each statevar like USEROFCURRENTSERVICE ( =
> >%u) to the logon-script.
> >This works and has nothing to do with the problem,
> >just an information for you ..
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> >instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> 
> Hi Harry,
> 
> AFAIK: windows maps drive y: or z: to the logon service to execute the logon
> script.
> 
> Ciao Oliver
> --

I dont think so.

Here's an output which shows, that Windows doesn't have
to map it, as it could and (afaik) does it with the 
following syntax ( \\SERVER\share ) :

-snipp-

D:\>dir \\486dx66\netlogon
 Datenträger in Laufwerk \\486dx66\netlogon: ist netlogon
 Datenträgernummer: 0F7C-24C4

 Verzeichnis von \\486dx66\netlogon

23.05.2002  14:31 .
05.04.2002  13:10 ..
11.05.2002  16:17  194 logon.bat
23.05.2002  14:312.345 logonsmb.bat
14.05.2002  14:57  140 delme.bat
11.05.2002  16:17  194 logon.cmd
16.05.2002  10:513.470 netlogon.sh
09.05.2002  22:37  617 welcome.sh
23.05.2002  14:31  112 arc
11.05.2002  10:033.021 test.bat
07.04.2002  14:516.341 netlogon.sh.old
11.05.2002  11:58  661 bye.sh
22.05.2002  16:371.598 os_logon.bat
16.05.2002  10:572.366 logonsmb.cmd
  12 Datei(en) 21.059 Bytes
   2 Verzeichnis(se),  86.474.752 Bytes frei

D:\>
-snipp-

You see, no drive necessary.
Your answer wouldn't match the drives u,v,w too.

Hoping for an answer and thanks

Harry

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] alternate data streams problem

2002-05-23 Thread Shai
Title: RE: [Samba] alternate data streams problem






Don,

thank you, I now understand who creates these files. 

what I still can't figure out is why this one machine creates them while others do not even though I have other win2k machine that has the registry key installed and do not create them.


-Original Message-

From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:34 PM

To: Shai; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: RE: [Samba] alternate data streams problem



Hi Shai,

Check out MS article Q319300.  Since samba advertises it's fs by default as

ntfs, this could be a problem with the machines you are seeing this on

having indexing on:

 

"Windows 2000 Content Indexing Server may add additional kmsearchhit0data

kmsearchhit1streams to image

files (.jpg, .gif, .bmp) that are stored on NTFS volumes.






CAUSE




By default, a filter driver is installed that creates thumbnails of images.

These thumbnails are stored in an kmsearchhit2alternate kmsearchhit3data

kmsearchhit4stream that is called

?Q30lsldxJoudresxAaaqpcawXc."

 

See the q article for info on a workaround...

 

Hope this helps,

Don




-Original Message-

From: Shai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:08

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: [Samba] alternate data streams problem




hi all,


I'm running into a strange problem:


I'm running a samba 2.2.3a server on a linux machine.


one win2k client is saving a directory full of pictures to this server but

all pictures files (jpg, tif...) are saved as three files, two of the as the

alternate data streams files of the original. it looks like this:


Pb060009.jpg    (the original file)


Pb060009.jpg:{4c8cc155-6c1e-11d1-8e41-00c04fb9386d}:$DATA


Pb060009.jpg:Q30lsldxJoudresxAaaqpcawXc:$DATA


this happened only to two clients and only with pictures.


other machine save pics normally without the alternate data streams being

seen.


does anyone have a clue?






[Samba] Netlogon from win9x using Kixtart to Samba server

2002-05-23 Thread Denis Mirassou

Hi,

I would want Samba shares to be automatically mounted as logicals drives
on win9x machines.

For this i try to use KIXTART (http://www.kixtart.org), a logon script
processor for Windows.
The advantage is that a unique login script may be used for all the
users.
The shares need to be mounted accordingly to the unix groups the user
belongs to.

Fo example, if a user belongs to the IT and TOTO groups then the
\\sambaserver\it and \\sambaserver\toto shares will automatically be
mounted.

The pb is that the KIXTART 's PRIMARYGROUP variable and ENUMGROUP()
function do not
return any values unless this works well under a Windows NT 4 server
(other variables passed from Sama server to client during logon
procedure return correct values : fullname, lserver, domain..)

A piece of the KIXTART.KIX file :

$index = 0
do
  $group = enumGroup($index)
  ? $group
  $index = $index+1
until len($group) = 0
...

A piece of the smb.conf file :

[global]
   workgroup = LAROCHELLE2.DOM
   server string = Orion2
   printcap name = /etc/printcap
   load printers = yes
   log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
   max log size = 50
   security = domain
   password server = ORION2
  encrypt passwords = yes
  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
  unix password sync = Yes
  passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
  passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
   socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
   domain master = yes 
   preferred master = yes
   domain logons = yes
   logon script = logon.bat
   dns proxy = no 
 [netlogon]
   comment = Network Logon Service
   path = /home/netlogon
   public = yes
   printable = no
   writable = yes
   write list = @informatique,root
...

Thanks,

Denis Mirassou

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] Re: Will/Can Exchange Server run with a samba pdc?

2002-05-23 Thread Uwe Melcher

I have running samba 2.2.2 with Exchange 5.5.
The samba is PDC (configured like suggested in Samba-PDC-Howto).
All works fine.



-- 
best regards


Uwe Melcher
o3sis IT AG
Systemmanagement
Olper Str. 33
D - 51491 Overath
Fon: +49 2204 747 254
Fax: +49 2204 747 222


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re:Re: [Samba] Problem with logon script

2002-05-23 Thread Oliver Six

Harry Rüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23.05.2002 14:36:27:

>
>Hi,
>
>Oliver Six wrote:
>> 
>> Harry Rüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23.05.2002 13:02:10:
>> 
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >i'm having a little problem with the logon-script feature.
>> >
>> >I work with a Winxx-network with Win2k and Win98-Clients.
>> >The fileserver is samba 2.2.4 on LINUX,Kernel 2.4.18.
>> >
>> >For debuging-purposes i wrote a pause command into the
>> >logon-script.
>> >
>> >A realized that there is an error message (in german, i try
>> >to translate) :
>> >
>> >---
>> >The local device is already used
>> >
>> >System error 85 .
>> >Help is available with the command NET HELPMSG 2250 .
>> >---
>> >
>> >Here is the part from my script :
>> >
>> >
>> >@SET SERVER=MYSERVER
>> >
>> >:Win2k
>> >rem echo In Win2k
>> >@NET TIME \\%Server% /SET /YES   > nul
>> >@net use u: \\%Server%\homepages > nul
>> >@net use v: \\%Server%\homes > nul
>> >@net use w: \\%Server%\fax   > nul
>> >@net use x: \\%Server%\data  > nul
>> >@if  not "%USEROFCURRENTSERVICE%" == "Administrator" goto
>> >win2kend
>> >@net use y: \\%Server%\rootdir$   > nul
>> >:win2kend
>> >rem @net use /PERSISTENT:NO > nul
>> >@net use z: /delete > nul
>> >@goto end
>> >-
>> >
>> >The client-OS on which the error occurs is Win2k.
>> >
>> >Windows seems to mount the drives itself befor the
>> >logon script is started.
>> >
>> >How can i solute this problem ?
>> >
>> >
>> >thanks Harry
>> >
>> >
>> >By the way , the logon-script is generated with a
>> >shell-script using the
>> >root preexec statement.
>> >
>> >So i can parse each statevar like USEROFCURRENTSERVICE ( =
>> >%u) to the logon-script.
>> >This works and has nothing to do with the problem,
>> >just an information for you ..
>> >
>> >--
>> >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> >instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>> 
>> Hi Harry,
>> 
>> AFAIK: windows maps drive y: or z: to the logon service to execute the logon
>> script.
>> 
>> Ciao Oliver
>> --
>
>I dont think so.
>
>Here's an output which shows, that Windows doesn't have
>to map it, as it could and (afaik) does it with the 
>following syntax ( \\SERVER\share ) :
>
>-snipp-
>
>D:\>dir \\486dx66\netlogon
> Datenträger in Laufwerk \\486dx66\netlogon: ist netlogon
> Datenträgernummer: 0F7C-24C4
>
> Verzeichnis von \\486dx66\netlogon
>
>23.05.2002  14:31 .
>05.04.2002  13:10 ..
>11.05.2002  16:17  194 logon.bat
>23.05.2002  14:312.345 logonsmb.bat
>14.05.2002  14:57  140 delme.bat
>11.05.2002  16:17  194 logon.cmd
>16.05.2002  10:513.470 netlogon.sh
>09.05.2002  22:37  617 welcome.sh
>23.05.2002  14:31  112 arc
>11.05.2002  10:033.021 test.bat
>07.04.2002  14:516.341 netlogon.sh.old
>11.05.2002  11:58  661 bye.sh
>22.05.2002  16:371.598 os_logon.bat
>16.05.2002  10:572.366 logonsmb.cmd
>  12 Datei(en) 21.059 Bytes
>   2 Verzeichnis(se),  86.474.752 Bytes frei
>
>D:\>
>-snipp-
>
>You see, no drive necessary.
>Your answer wouldn't match the drives u,v,w too.
>
>Hoping for an answer and thanks
>
>Harry
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Hi Harry,

you're right; but *AFAIK* windows will map the drive. Try to put a "net use 
>c:\bla.txt" in your logon script to see which drives are mapped during 
>execution of logon script. In a thread last year I saw a problem when 
>disconnecting y: or z: in the logon script. 

Ciao Oliver
--
Good programming is 40% experience, 30% skill, 20% RTFM, 10% caffeine, and 5% 
attention to detail. 

Oliver Six, CEO
CAHOS GmbH, Cimbernstr. 51, Germany 81377 Muenchen
Phone +49 89 71 01 93 41,  Fax +49 89 71 01 93 42


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Saving file and file locking problems

2002-05-23 Thread Jean-Rene Cormier

I was just with my boss cause he had trouble with some Excel and Word
document on the Samba server. I noticed that when he saves an Excel
document sometimes it takes a lot of time to save and sometimes Excel
stop responding, when that happens the file stays locked on the server
and when he tries to open it back, he can only open it read only. Is
there a reason why it takes so much time to save? And is there someway I
can prevent the file from staying locked?

Jean-Rene Cormier




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] Saving file and file locking problems

2002-05-23 Thread David Brodbeck

Shortly after we deployed Samba we had a problem with an AutoCAD user who
had trouble saving files, and with files ending up locked for no apparent
reason.  We found he'd been accidentally placed on a network hub that was
badly overloaded, and the packet loss was apparently causing the locking
problems.  After correcting that everything worked smoothly.  (And some
mysterious problems we'd been having with our Access database before the
Samba deployment went away, too.)

I guess this is a long way of telling you to make sure your boss's
connection to the network is good. :)

-Original Message-
From: Jean-Rene Cormier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Samba List
Subject: [Samba] Saving file and file locking problems


I was just with my boss cause he had trouble with some Excel and Word
document on the Samba server. I noticed that when he saves an Excel
document sometimes it takes a lot of time to save and sometimes Excel
stop responding, when that happens the file stays locked on the server
and when he tries to open it back, he can only open it read only. Is
there a reason why it takes so much time to save? And is there someway I
can prevent the file from staying locked?

Jean-Rene Cormier




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Netlogon from win9x using Kixtart to Samba server

2002-05-23 Thread Adam Manock

At 03:09 PM 5/23/2002 +0200, Denis Mirassou wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I would want Samba shares to be automatically mounted as logicals drives
>on win9x machines.

Hmm.. Sounds familiar...

http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-April/071712.html

Adam


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] PANIC: share_modes_identical

2002-05-23 Thread Rich Forman


When 2.2.4 was released, I updated my cvs and did ./configure and make (no
special options).  Since I came in somewhat early today and nobody was
around I did the make install.  Everything ran fine until I tried to load a
particular file and I'm receiving the following error and unable to open the
file on a network share.  If I place the file on a local drive it loads
fine.  Permissions and what not are identical to when I was running 2.2.3a.
Any thoughts?  TIA.


smbd/service.c:make_connection(651)  forman (192.168.100.14) connect to
service cad as user rich (uid=506, gid=100) (pid 17884)
smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(631)  open_mode_check: exlusive oplock left by
process 17884 after break ! For fileDRV/periscope/PScope15.arx, dev = 801,
inode = 1193703. Deleting it to continue...
smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(635)  open_mode_check: Existent process 17884
left active oplock.
locking/locking.c:share_modes_identical(560)  PANIC: share_modes_identical:
share_mode missmatch (e1 = 32, e2 = 32800). Logic error.
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1092)  PANIC: PANIC: share_modes_identical logic error.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Using an IBM 8227 Lan Entry Access Point

2002-05-23 Thread Alfredo Cole

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi:

I'm using Red Hat 7.0 and stock samba. 

I just bought an 8227 IBM Access point from eBay, and it says it
needs a Lan Manager server supporting LLC to download the boot image.
Can Linux and Samba be used to support this access point? If so,
could someone point the way where I can find docs to configure this
setup?

Thank you.

- -- 
Alfredo J. Cole
http://www.acyc.com (Accounting Systems)
http://www.clshonduras.com (Linux Hardware)
PGP Key available from certserver.pgp.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE87QScu5DxuPWE298RAnlwAJ9Dp8l3EEGzbNdOJwMCMslCCaakLQCdEzG/
1njrsBZ6qBRrO7TpN9hHtHI=
=dUvk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Strange Problem with Word 97 saving to samba share

2002-05-23 Thread Jamie Heckford

Hi,

When I save a document to a network share (this only happens in word 97) it
works fine.
However, when I reopen that document, modify it and click save I get the
error message:

"Word cannot complete the save due to a file permission error"

I check and the original document has been deleted and all that is left is a
~WRL.tmp file.

Does anyone know what the cause of this may be?

The individual shares are set up as:

[jamie$]
 comment = Jamie Heckford
 path = /data1-home/jamie
 valid users = jamie, @admin
 force user = root
 writeable = yes
 force create mode = 0777

And the directory permissions for /data1-home/jamie are:

drwxrwxrwx   9 root  micro 1024 May 23 15:20 jamie/


The reason this is being forced as root is /data1-home is an NFS mounted
share, which will only
allow the root user to read/write to it.

Any help people can give will be greatly appreciated.

thanks,

--
Jamie Heckford
Network Manager
Trident Microsystems Ltd
Tel:  01737 780790  Fax:  01737 771908
http://www.tridentmicrosystems.co.uk

***

This e-mail message contains confidential information for
the above addressee only. Any opinion or views contained
in this e-mail message are those of the sender and do not
necessarily represent those of the Company. Unless otherwise
stated this e-mail message is not intended to be contractually
binding.  E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free and the sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message.

Trident Microsystems Ltd Group of Companies
Perrywood Business Park, Honeycrock Lane, Salfords, Redhill,
Surrey, RH1 5JQ

Tel:  (44) (0) 1737 780790   Fax:  (44) (0) 1737 771908

Registered office:  Abacus House, Bone Lane, Newbury,
Berkshire, RG14 5SF


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] $SMBDOPTIONS in xinetd.conf

2002-05-23 Thread Nate Perry-Thistle

> You might also want to check the names of files the init script tries
> to include. There might be some SMBDOPTIONS variable defined there
> already.

You'll find this type of included options in /etc/sysconfig.  In RedHat
you'll have a file named 'samba' that by default looks like:

# Options to smbd
SMBDOPTIONS="-D"
# Options to nmbd
NMBDOPTIONS="-D"

n.

Nate Perry-Thistle
Network Administrator
tristream

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] alternate data streams problem

2002-05-23 Thread Jeremy Allison

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:34:11AM -0400, MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) wrote:
> Hi Shai,
> Check out MS article Q319300.  Since samba advertises it's fs by default as
> ntfs, this could be a problem with the machines you are seeing this on
> having indexing on:
>  
> "Windows 2000 Content Indexing Server may add additional kmsearchhit0data
> kmsearchhit1streams to image
> files (.jpg, .gif, .bmp) that are stored on NTFS volumes.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> CAUSE
> 
> 
> 
> By default, a filter driver is installed that creates thumbnails of images.
> These thumbnails are stored in an kmsearchhit2alternate kmsearchhit3data
> kmsearchhit4stream that is called
> ?Q30lsldxJoudresxAaaqpcawXc."
>  
> See the q article for info on a workaround...
>  
> Hope this helps,
> Don
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Shai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:08
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Samba] alternate data streams problem
> 
> 
> 
> hi all,
> 
> I'm running into a strange problem:
> 
> I'm running a samba 2.2.3a server on a linux machine.
> 
> one win2k client is saving a directory full of pictures to this server but
> all pictures files (jpg, tif...) are saved as three files, two of the as the
> alternate data streams files of the original. it looks like this:
> 
> Pb060009.jpg(the original file)
> 
> Pb060009.jpg:{4c8cc155-6c1e-11d1-8e41-00c04fb9386d}:$DATA

This was a bug we fixed for 2.2.4.

Jeremy.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] - Win2k local groups and domain groups on linux PDC

2002-05-23 Thread Matt Lung



I am currently running Samba 2.2.4 on a RH 7.1 
box acting as a PDC with two Win2k test clients attaching to it.  
Users authenticate to the PDC via an LDAP server running on the PDC and that 
works ok.  I can also join the domain with no problems.  What I am 
trying to accomplish is to have a domain user or better yet a group of domain 
users, be able to log into the win2k box and have the linux domain group they 
belong to be able to be part of one of the Win2k local groups so they can have 
administrative privileges right off the bat without having to add several domain 
users to a win2k local group.  
 
What I've encountered is that when I edit the 
Administrators local group or any other group on the win2k box and want to add a 
domain group such as @admin, none of the domain groups even show up in the 
list.  It only lists domain users.  So my question is is there 
anyway to get the groups to populate in this list also  Sure would be 
nice.
 
If anyone can help me out with fixing this or 
somewhat pointing me in the right direction I would really appreciate 
it.
 
thanks.
 
Matt Lung


[Samba] Newbe

2002-05-23 Thread Gert Jensen

My name is Gert Jensen and I am a newbe to Samba.
I have tried installing it a few time and have run into the same problem no 
matter how I try to get the management module to load.
Can someone on the list give me instructions or send me to a site where 
there are explicit instructions on how to set up SWAP with the latest 
version of Sambe and Red Hat 7.3.
When I try to access http://localhost:901, it fails to connect.  HELP, 
please :O).
Gert

Gert Jensen Phone: 607-275-3497
Danica Computing, Inc.  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
309 North Tioga Street  Web: 
http://www.danicacomputing.com
Ithaca, NY 14850Web: http://www.danica.com  



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] SMB sharing under Mac OS X Server

2002-05-23 Thread trlblzr

Hello all:

I've scoured the web for a solution to this problem to no avail, and thought someone 
on this list might be able to point me in the proper direction...  I realize this 
isn't the best place for Macintosh help, but it is Samba related, so please bear with 
me :-)

Some quick background: I have a Power Mac G4 Dual GHz machine running Mac OS X Server 
10.1.4, and have a Micronet SCSI RAID system with one shared folder, Data.  This 
server is configured to register with the WINS server on the LAN, and is a member of 
the corporate workgroup.  Windows clients (mainly W2k) can see the server in Network 
Neighborhood, can log into the server and can see the share Data listed.  However, 
they cannot connect to the share.  I get the message:

//Server/Data is not accessible.  The network name cannot be found.

I have checked my smb.conf file settings, and it appears to be configured properly.  
I'm almost positive the problem lies with the Samba running on OS X, as our Mac 
clients have no problem connecting through Apple File Sharing via TCP/IP.  The server 
is clearly visible on the Windows network, but the share cannot be accessed.  I'm out 
of ideas!

Can anyone provide any insight?  If this isn't the forum to ask this, tell me to 
bugger off and I won't take offense :-)

Many thanks in advance for any assistance,

Jason Westlake

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] want to stop logging on 2.0.3

2002-05-23 Thread george doogle

I'm new to samba so excuse this simple question.

I am running 2.0.3. My smb.conf file contains only the
following settings related to logging:
log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m
max log size = 50
How do I stop the logging process. I've read the docs
and have tried a few things without success. I tried
adding syslog=1 and loglevel=0 but I started getting
errors on my unix console about not being able to cd
to certain directories (which I understand why you
could not connect to them). 

How do I stop the logging process?

Thanks for any help.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] SMB sharing under Mac OS X Server

2002-05-23 Thread Roland Schmid

> Hello all:

> I've scoured the web for a solution to this problem to no avail, and thought someone 
>on this list might be able to point me in the proper direction...  I realize this 
>isn't the best place for
> Macintosh help, but it is Samba related, so please bear with me :-)

> Some quick background: I have a Power Mac G4 Dual GHz machine running Mac OS X 
>Server 10.1.4, and have a Micronet SCSI RAID system with one shared folder, Data.  
>This server is configured to
> register with the WINS server on the LAN, and is a member of the corporate 
>workgroup.  Windows clients (mainly W2k) can see the server in Network Neighborhood, 
>can log into the server and can see
> the share Data listed.  However, they cannot connect to the share.  I get the 
>message:

> //Server/Data is not accessible.  The network name cannot be found.

> I have checked my smb.conf file settings, and it appears to be configured properly.  
>I'm almost positive the problem lies with the Samba running on OS X, as our Mac 
>clients have no problem
> connecting through Apple File Sharing via TCP/IP.  The server is clearly visible on 
>the Windows network, but the share cannot be accessed.  I'm out of ideas!

> Can anyone provide any insight?  If this isn't the forum to ask this, tell me to 
>bugger off and I won't take offense :-)

> Many thanks in advance for any assistance,

> Jason Westlake



Hello,
I've no expierence with the MAC OS, but did you enter the w2k user who
wants to access the share on the SMB-Server?
Check if you need password encryption or not (on the SMB-Server)
Hope this helps.

Best regards,
Roland
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Regenerate MACHINE.SID

2002-05-23 Thread Byars, Jason M

I goofed adding some machines to my domain so now I have to do it all over.
I removed the secrets.tdb and MACHINE.SID files, but when I join the domain
again, the MACHINE.SID is not regenerated.  How do I force them to be
correctly regenerated on 2.2.4?  Here's what I'm doing:

1. kill smb and winbind
2. delete secrets.tdb and MACHINE.SID
3. remove from NT4 PDC
4. add machine to NT4 PDC
5. smbpasswd -j .
6. restart smb and winbind

I get the secrets.tdb file back everytime, but nothing seems to bring back
the MACHINE.SID.  I've tried rebooting incase I forgot to kill something.
Ideas?  Thanks

Jason

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] share modes explanation

2002-05-23 Thread Enrique Sanchez Vela


Hi everybody,

 recently I've been having problems running products
of the network and the Application_Serving.txt
document has a good explanation of  what might be
going on, I haven't tested yet.

I have a question here...

  it says to enable share modes while copying the
files, then remove the share modes operation to be
able to run/install applications from it. 

   Is it required to switch it on/off on everytime
this is install setup going to ocurr?

thnaks,
esv

__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Regenerate MACHINE.SID

2002-05-23 Thread Jeremy Allison

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:11:58AM -0500, Byars, Jason M wrote:
> I goofed adding some machines to my domain so now I have to do it all over.
> I removed the secrets.tdb and MACHINE.SID files, but when I join the domain
> again, the MACHINE.SID is not regenerated.  How do I force them to be
> correctly regenerated on 2.2.4?  Here's what I'm doing:
> 
> 1. kill smb and winbind
> 2. delete secrets.tdb and MACHINE.SID
> 3. remove from NT4 PDC
> 4. add machine to NT4 PDC
> 5. smbpasswd -j .
> 6. restart smb and winbind
> 
> I get the secrets.tdb file back everytime, but nothing seems to bring back
> the MACHINE.SID.  I've tried rebooting incase I forgot to kill something.
> Ideas?  Thanks

The contents of the MACHINE.SID were moved into secrets.tdb for 2.2.4.
If a MACHINE.SID file exists it will be used, but if not the machine
SID is generated and stored in the secrets.tdb file.

Jeremy.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] SMB sharing under Mac OS X Server

2002-05-23 Thread trlblzr



On Thu, 23 May 2002 18:07:11 +0200 Roland Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello all:

> I've scoured the web for a solution to this problem to no avail, and thought someone 
>on this list might be able to point me in the proper direction...  I realize this 
>isn't the best place for
> Macintosh help, but it is Samba related, so please bear with me :-)

> Some quick background: I have a Power Mac G4 Dual GHz machine running Mac OS X 
>Server 10.1.4, and have a Micronet SCSI RAID system with one shared folder, Data.  
>This server is configured to
> register with the WINS server on the LAN, and is a member of the corporate 
>workgroup.  Windows clients (mainly W2k) can see the server in Network Neighborhood, 
>can log into the server and can see
> the share Data listed.  However, they cannot connect to the share.  I get the 
>message:

> //Server/Data is not accessible.  The network name cannot be found.

> I have checked my smb.conf file settings, and it appears to be configured properly.  
>I'm almost positive the problem lies with the Samba running on OS X, as our Mac 
>clients have no problem
> connecting through Apple File Sharing via TCP/IP.  The server is clearly visible on 
>the Windows network, but the share cannot be accessed.  I'm out of ideas!

> Can anyone provide any insight?  If this isn't the forum to ask this, tell me to 
>bugger off and I won't take offense :-)

> Many thanks in advance for any assistance,

> Jason Westlake



Hello,
I've no expierence with the MAC OS, but did you enter the w2k user who
wants to access the share on the SMB-Server?
Check if you need password encryption or not (on the SMB-Server)
Hope this helps.

Best regards,
Roland
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*

Yes, the users have all been added and the server's Win Authentication is on (we do 
need it here).

Thanks!

j-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Samba VFS module

2002-05-23 Thread Ariel Mella

i downloaded the latest samba 2_2 CVS and looks like the recycle vfs module
now is working ok, instead the samba 2.2.4-2.i386.rpm from the ftp site that
vfs module recycle it's not working.
later i tried this patch
http://www.elbonia.de/samba/recycle.patch
thats put some interesting options into the recycle module, but reject to
apply it.
could be possible to add it to the cvs?
thanx


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] SMB sharing under Mac OS X Server

2002-05-23 Thread Tony Nichols

Try a very simple config file that has no security (just to test).

[global]

# workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name
   workgroup = your workgroup name

# server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field
   server string = Samba Server

   security = share

   local master = no

   os level = 5

   name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast

   wins server = 192.168.1.2 (your wins server)

# Share Definitions
==

[tmp]
   comment = Temporary file space
   path = /tmp
   read only = no
   public = yes
   guest ok = yes

Good Luck!




A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
Appalachian Log Structures Inc.
www.applog.com 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
888-999-2574 x124 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Roland Schmid
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] SMB sharing under Mac OS X Server




On Thu, 23 May 2002 18:07:11 +0200 Roland Schmid
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello all:

> I've scoured the web for a solution to this problem to no avail, and 
> thought someone on this list might be able to point me in the proper 
> direction...  I realize this isn't the best place for Macintosh help, 
> but it is Samba related, so please bear with me :-)

> Some quick background: I have a Power Mac G4 Dual GHz machine running 
> Mac OS X Server 10.1.4, and have a Micronet SCSI RAID system with one 
> shared folder, Data.  This server is configured to register with the 
> WINS server on the LAN, and is a member of the corporate workgroup.  
> Windows clients (mainly W2k) can see the server in Network 
> Neighborhood, can log into the server and can see the share Data 
> listed.  However, they cannot connect to the share.  I get the 
> message:

> //Server/Data is not accessible.  The network name cannot be found.

> I have checked my smb.conf file settings, and it appears to be 
> configured properly.  I'm almost positive the problem lies with the 
> Samba running on OS X, as our Mac clients have no problem connecting 
> through Apple File Sharing via TCP/IP.  The server is clearly visible 
> on the Windows network, but the share cannot be accessed.  I'm out of 
> ideas!

> Can anyone provide any insight?  If this isn't the forum to ask this, 
> tell me to bugger off and I won't take offense :-)

> Many thanks in advance for any assistance,

> Jason Westlake



Hello,
I've no expierence with the MAC OS, but did you enter the w2k user who
wants to access the share on the SMB-Server? Check if you need password
encryption or not (on the SMB-Server) Hope this helps.

Best regards,
Roland
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*

Yes, the users have all been added and the server's Win Authentication
is on (we do need it here).

Thanks!

j-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] - Win2k local groups and domain groups on linux PDC

2002-05-23 Thread Yannick Tousignant



 
In Samba release 2.2.2, only 2 groups are dealed for Microsoft Windows 
workstations: Domain
Admins and Domain Users. All other groups are considered Local Unix 
Group. That's
mean that a Samba user will only be Domain user or Domain Admin. If you only 
use Samba
servers, there will be no problem, but if you plan to use Microsoft Windows 
NT member server
using groups, just forget about 
it... 
 
Cut/Paste of  --> The SAMBA-LDAP-PDC Howto 
Revision : 1:14
Hope this 
help...
Yannick
 
 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt 
LungSent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:53 AMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] - Win2k local groups and domain 
groups on linux PDC

  I am currently running Samba 2.2.4 on a RH 7.1 
  box acting as a PDC with two Win2k test clients attaching to it.  
  Users authenticate to the PDC via an LDAP server running on the PDC and that 
  works ok.  I can also join the domain with no problems.  What I am 
  trying to accomplish is to have a domain user or better yet a group of domain 
  users, be able to log into the win2k box and have the linux domain group they 
  belong to be able to be part of one of the Win2k local groups so they can have 
  administrative privileges right off the bat without having to add several 
  domain users to a win2k local group.  
   
  What I've encountered is that when I edit the 
  Administrators local group or any other group on the win2k box and want to add 
  a domain group such as @admin, none of the domain groups even show up in the 
  list.  It only lists domain users.  So my question is is there 
  anyway to get the groups to populate in this list also  Sure would be 
  nice.
   
  If anyone can help me out with fixing this or 
  somewhat pointing me in the right direction I would really appreciate 
  it.
   
  thanks.
   
  Matt Lung


RE: [Samba] - Win2k local groups and domain groups on linux PDC

2002-05-23 Thread Yannick Tousignant



It appear 
to me that LDAP groups are not considerate like
valid 
domain group for Windows NT/2000. This is why,
and please 
correct me if i'm wrong, it is not possible
to do such 
thing.
 
Yannick
 

  -Original Message-From: Matt Lung 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:39 
  PMTo: Yannick TousignantSubject: Re: [Samba] - Win2k 
  local groups and domain groups on linux PDC
  I am using only linux servers.  How can I 
  make the groups on the linux server appear in windows so i can add them to 
  like Power Users group or a group on windows?
   
  matt
   
   
   
  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
Yannick Tousignant 
To: Matt 
Lung 
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:54 
PM
Subject: RE: [Samba] - Win2k local 
groups and domain groups on linux PDC

  
In Samba release 2.2.2, only 2 groups are dealed for Microsoft Windows 
workstations: Domain
Admins and Domain Users. All other groups are considered Local Unix 
Group. 
That's
mean that a Samba user will only be Domain user or Domain Admin. If you 
only use Samba
servers, there will be no problem, but if you plan to use Microsoft 
Windows NT member 
server
using groups, just forget about 
it... 
 
Cut/Paste of  --> The SAMBA-LDAP-PDC Howto 
Revision : 1:14
Hope 
this help...
Yannick
 
 -Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf 
Of Matt LungSent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:53 
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] - Win2k 
local groups and domain groups on linux PDC

  I am currently running Samba 2.2.4 on a RH 
  7.1 box acting as a PDC with two Win2k test clients attaching to 
  it.  Users authenticate to the PDC via an LDAP server running on the 
  PDC and that works ok.  I can also join the domain with no 
  problems.  What I am trying to accomplish is to have a domain user or 
  better yet a group of domain users, be able to log into the win2k box and 
  have the linux domain group they belong to be able to be part of one of 
  the Win2k local groups so they can have administrative privileges right 
  off the bat without having to add several domain users to a win2k local 
  group.  
   
  What I've encountered is that when I edit the 
  Administrators local group or any other group on the win2k box and want to 
  add a domain group such as @admin, none of the domain groups even show up 
  in the list.  It only lists domain users.  So my question is 
  is there anyway to get the groups to populate in this list also  
  Sure would be nice.
   
  If anyone can help me out with fixing this or 
  somewhat pointing me in the right direction I would really appreciate 
  it.
   
  thanks.
   
  Matt 
Lung


[Samba] Active Directory and Samba

2002-05-23 Thread Gilles Vautour


Does anyone know when we can expect a SAMBA version that will function
in an Native Mode Active Directory Environment?

Gilles Vautour
Informatics Technologies Services  Division
Statistics Canada


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] slow localhost smbclient xfer

2002-05-23 Thread Ilia Lobsanov

I'm transferring a 1MB file over the "lo" interface on samba 2.2.3a-6
(debian woody) using smbclient.
The speed is 71 kb/s. Why is it so slow?

Here's the relevant part of my smb.conf:

[global]
log level = 0
syslog only = no
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
printing = cups
dns proxy = no
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
encrypt passwords = true
time server = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192
SO_RCVBUF=819
2
short preserve case = yes
bind interfaces only = yes
printcap name = lpstat
invalid users = root
max log size = 1000
obey pam restrictions = yes
passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n
*Retype\snew\sUNIX\spas
sword:* %n\n
security = share
preserve case = yes
unix password sync = false
workgroup = WORKGROUP
server string = %h server
syslog = 0;
netbios name = brain
guest account = nobody
username map = /etc/samba/user.map
interfaces = 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.0/24 127.0.0.1




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Active Directory and Samba

2002-05-23 Thread Jeremy Allison

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:25:39PM -0400, Gilles Vautour wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know when we can expect a SAMBA version that will function
> in an Native Mode Active Directory Environment?

How about now. Samba 2.2.4 functions in a native mode ad environment.

Jeremy.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Semaphore Timeout on from Win2K to Samba

2002-05-23 Thread Bill Parker

I have been using Samba w/out any problems what so ever for the longest time,
but today, I cannot connect to the linux box (shows up in network neighborhood
as 'LINUXSERVER'), but when I try to connect from a win2K machine (which
normally connects w/NO problems). Here is the output from /var/log/messages
(appears the problem is in smbd)

May 23 11:34:14 fileserver nmbd[1423]: [2002/05/23 11:34:14, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(65)
May 23 11:34:14 fileserver nmbd[1423]:   Got SIGTERM: going down...
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]: [2002/05/23 11:35:45, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]: [2002/05/23 11:35:45, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]: [2002/05/23 11:35:45, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]: [2002/05/23 11:35:45, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]: [2002/05/23 11:35:45, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]: [2002/05/23 11:35:45, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(542)
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]:   write_socket_data: write failure. 
Error = Broken pipe
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]: [2002/05/23 11:35:45, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(566)
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]:   write_socket: Error writing 4 
bytes to socket 12: ERRNO = Broken pipe
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]: [2002/05/23 11:35:45, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(730)
May 23 11:35:45 fileserver smbd[1473]:   Error writing 4 bytes to client. 
-1. (Broken pipe)
May 23 11:35:48 fileserver named[426]: Cleaned cache of 18 RRsets
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]: [2002/05/23 11:35:55, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]: [2002/05/23 11:35:55, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]: [2002/05/23 11:35:55, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]: [2002/05/23 11:35:55, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]: [2002/05/23 11:35:55, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]: [2002/05/23 11:35:55, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(542)
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]:   write_socket_data: write failure. 
Error = Broken pipe
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]: [2002/05/23 11:35:55, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(566)
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]:   write_socket: Error writing 4 
bytes to socket 12: ERRNO = Broken pipe
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]: [2002/05/23 11:35:55, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(730)
May 23 11:35:55 fileserver smbd[1475]:   Error writing 4 bytes to client. 
-1. (Broken pipe)
[root@fileserver log]# tail -80 messages
May 23 11:29:51 fileserver smbd[1429]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:29:51 fileserver smbd[1429]: [2002/05/23 11:29:51, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(542)
May 23 11:29:51 fileserver smbd[1429]:   write_socket_data: write failure. 
Error = Broken pipe
May 23 11:29:51 fileserver smbd[1429]: [2002/05/23 11:29:51, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(566)
May 23 11:29:51 fileserver smbd[1429]:   write_socket: Error writing 4 
bytes to socket 12: ERRNO = Broken pipe
May 23 11:29:51 fileserver smbd[1429]: [2002/05/23 11:29:51, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(730)
May 23 11:29:51 fileserver smbd[1429]:   Error writing 4 bytes to client. 
-1. (Broken pipe)
May 23 11:30:18 fileserver smbd[1430]: [2002/05/23 11:30:18, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:30:18 fileserver smbd[1430]:   getpeername failed. Error was 
Transport endpoint is not connected
May 23 11:30:18 fileserver smbd[1430]: [2002/05/23 11:30:18, 0] 
lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1038)
May 23 11:30:18 fileserver smbd[1430]:   getpeername failed. Err

Re: [Samba] SMB sharing under Mac OS X Server

2002-05-23 Thread trlblzr

Thanks, Tony... I'll try that.  Will post results!

j-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Only Netbeui on the client is it possible ?

2002-05-23 Thread Viktor Posta

HI all !

I've read in a doc,  that Samba is talking only with the clients where
Netbios over TCP/IP is running !

I guess it is true, but are there any solution maybe to connect with a
client where only the NETBEUI is the only one installed protocol ?

It would be from DOS, I have a DOS boot disk which is waking up the
Netbeui, and it would be difficult to prepare it to wake up the TCP/IP !

So maybe somebody have solved this ?
Or forget it ?

Best Regards !

Viktor Posta





-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] print job logging

2002-05-23 Thread Nick Pietraniec

When a print job passes through an NT print server, the job is examined
and a page count is recorded in the log...  Just out of curiosity, is
anyone working to decipher these windows print jobs to do similar
logging on a samba box?

-Nick


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Samba 3.0 Release?

2002-05-23 Thread Gilles Vautour

Anyone know when a beta or final version of Samba 3 is expected?

Gilles Vautour
Informatics Technologies Services Division
Statistics Canada


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 Release?

2002-05-23 Thread Jeremy Allison

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:28:45PM -0400, Gilles Vautour wrote:
> Anyone know when a beta or final version of Samba 3 is expected?

When it is "ready" (for some version of ready :-). Best guess is
sometime this autumn.

Jeremy.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] changing domains

2002-05-23 Thread Hidong Kim

Hi,

We're going through a massive IT upgrade at our company.  All of the
Windows computers are begin migrated to a new domain.  I want to move
our Red Hat 7.2 Samba server to the new domain.  I changed the domain
name using SWAT.  I checked that the new domain name was entered in
/etc/samba/smb.conf.  But the Samba server isn't showing up in the new
domain in the Network Neighborhood on the Windows machines.  In
/etc/samba/smb.conf, I have this:

# Global parameters
[global]
domain = NEWDOMAIN
server string = Samba Server
security = SHARE
encrypt passwords = Yes
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
os level = 33
preferred master = True
local master = No
domain master = False
dns proxy = No
wins support = Yes
guest account = smbuser
hosts allow = 192.168.230. 127.



Thanks,



Hidong

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] SMB Connection failed

2002-05-23 Thread Urban Widmark

On Thu, 23 May 2002, Roland Schmid wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> as far as I know the command to mount an SMB Filesystem is:
> mount -t smbfs -o username=YOURNAME,password=pass  //server/sharename/
> /folder/pointer
> 
> YOURNAME and pass must be an Account on the Windows OS, who has Admin-Rights

You do not need admin-rights to connect. Just normal read and write (or
whatever it is you do ... :)

/Urban


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Migration to TNG

2002-05-23 Thread Jan Peuker

Hi list,

as a result of horrible error logs and no sleep I would be able to throw my
smb2.2.4 out of the window and take a phone call to dell for a nt box ...
but I'll try once again.
I know, this is the wrong list, but maybe here I get more Developers. My
simple question is: If my PDC (WinS -> named, system is SuSE 7.3 but newest
versions of all relevant software) won't run as smooth as I've heard of
samba should I switch to TNG?
And if, could I migrate my dirs, user lists, and smb.conf to TNG? I always
get these "no security info sent" errors, even if I turn encrypted passwords
or acl-support off. And even if I don't use it, I compiled with pam and
msfs, nothing solved these problems. Ok, they don't seem to affect anything
else seriously than the warn-log, but I think there should be no cause why a
user needs about 10 minutes to log off, should it? Thanks a lot,

jan


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Only Netbeui on the client is it possible ?

2002-05-23 Thread Balatoni Denes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi!
Maybe you could look at ww.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme
There is a kernel patch for 2.4.17 to support netbeui, and a patch to
samba 2.0.6 to support netbeui.
bye Denes

ps: this is no use to you, but there is a netbeui printclient to connect
to netbeui print servers at http://people.inf.elte.hu/isten/printserver.html
2002. május 23. 21:14 dátummal Viktor Posta errol ugatot:
$$$ HI all !
$$$
$$$ I've read in a doc,  that Samba is talking only with the clients where
$$$ Netbios over TCP/IP is running !
$$$
$$$ I guess it is true, but are there any solution maybe to connect with a
$$$ client where only the NETBEUI is the only one installed protocol ?
$$$
$$$ It would be from DOS, I have a DOS boot disk which is waking up the
$$$ Netbeui, and it would be difficult to prepare it to wake up the TCP/IP !
$$$
$$$ So maybe somebody have solved this ?
$$$ Or forget it ?
$$$
$$$ Best Regards !
$$$
$$$ Viktor Posta
$$$
$$$
$$$
$$$
$$$

- -- 
Experience the power of Linux!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE87U8maQToeq3jgogRAjxNAJkBBglrVYrqIpNvbIg/MxxbQKQDbACcDlIH
ovpUfSrqNWFiwi+AEoW7nfE=
=/fHZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Only Netbeui on the client is it possible ?

2002-05-23 Thread Balatoni Denes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi!
Sorry I forgot to add, that you do need the patch at 
people.inf.elte.hu/isten/printserver.html to the kernel, cause the acme5 
patch's llc code is a bit broken.

>Hi!
>Maybe you could look at ww.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme
>There is a kernel patch for 2.4.17 to support netbeui, and a patch to
>samba 2.0.6 to support netbeui.
>bye Denes


2002. május 23. 21:14 dátummal Viktor Posta errol ugatot:
$$$ HI all !
$$$
$$$ I've read in a doc,  that Samba is talking only with the clients where
$$$ Netbios over TCP/IP is running !
$$$
$$$ I guess it is true, but are there any solution maybe to connect with a
$$$ client where only the NETBEUI is the only one installed protocol ?
$$$
$$$ It would be from DOS, I have a DOS boot disk which is waking up the
$$$ Netbeui, and it would be difficult to prepare it to wake up the TCP/IP !
$$$
$$$ So maybe somebody have solved this ?
$$$ Or forget it ?
$$$
$$$ Best Regards !
$$$
$$$ Viktor Posta

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE87U/maQToeq3jgogRAvqZAJ96PRdNn6g/9t13YBLOFpthL0CxoQCggGaM
yajrmowbqdjy6nbuuarsL7k=
=fEQz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[samba] - Domain Users and Windows 2000... Help

2002-05-23 Thread Matt Lung



Can someone please tell me if it is possible to add 
a group on a linux PDC running Samba 2.2.4 to a windows 2000 clients local 
"Power Users Group" or any of the local windows 2k groups.  I want certain 
people to be in the Power Users Group on 2K, but I don't want to have to add 
each domain user individually to that local win2k group, I want to add a domain 
group to the win2k group.  Right now all I see are domain users when I try 
and populate a 2K local group and I'm wondering if it is possible at all to even 
add a domain group to a local win2k group if anyone can provide me with an 
answer I'd appreciate it.
 
Thanks,
Matt Lung


Re: [samba] - Domain Users and Windows 2000... Help

2002-05-23 Thread Sam Barasch

Hi Matt.

I've had some success adding the 'authenticated users' group to the 
powerusers group.  I think that the 'authenticated users' group consists of 
all users who authenticate against the domain.

If authenticated users is added to the local powerusers group, it may give 
you what you're looking for.

Again, my experiments with this are rather incomplete - I'd like to see how 
it works for you.  I'd also be interested in a XP pro setting.

---
Sam Barasch
Computer Systems Support
Department of Biostatistics
University of Wisconsin Madison
At 03:42 PM 5/23/2002 -0500, Matt Lung wrote:
>Can someone please tell me if it is possible to add a group on a linux PDC 
>running Samba 2.2.4 to a windows 2000 clients local "Power Users Group" or 
>any of the local windows 2k groups.  I want certain people to be in the 
>Power Users Group on 2K, but I don't want to have to add each domain user 
>individually to that local win2k group, I want to add a domain group to 
>the win2k group.  Right now all I see are domain users when I try and 
>populate a 2K local group and I'm wondering if it is possible at all to 
>even add a domain group to a local win2k group if anyone can provide 
>me with an answer I'd appreciate it.
>
>Thanks,
>Matt Lung


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Newbe

2002-05-23 Thread Mike Babnick

Here is what I did to make SWAT work on an RH 7.2 box.

Find the following file: /etc/xinetd.d/swat

It's a text file you will need to edit.

# default: off
# description: SWAT is the Samba Web Admin Tool. Use swat \
#  to configure your Samba server. To use SWAT, \
#  connect to port 901 with your favorite web browser.
service swat
{
port= 901
socket_type = stream
wait= no
only_from   = 127.0.0.1
user= root
server  = /usr/sbin/swat
log_on_failure  += USERID
disable = yes
}

Change

disable = yes

to

disable = no

Save and restart.

Cheers,

Mike

On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:42, Gert Jensen wrote:
> My name is Gert Jensen and I am a newbe to Samba.
> I have tried installing it a few time and have run into the same problem no 
> matter how I try to get the management module to load.
> Can someone on the list give me instructions or send me to a site where 
> there are explicit instructions on how to set up SWAP with the latest 
> version of Sambe and Red Hat 7.3.
> When I try to access http://localhost:901, it fails to connect.  HELP, 
> please :O).
> Gert
> 
> Gert Jensen Phone: 607-275-3497
> Danica Computing, Inc.  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 309 North Tioga Street  Web: 
> http://www.danicacomputing.com
> Ithaca, NY 14850Web: http://www.danica.com  
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Samba 2.2.4 frequent mangled names clashes

2002-05-23 Thread Dieter Stampfer

Hi all,

while working with Netbench I've discovered that mangled directory names
clash rather frequently with Samba 2.2.4:

If I take an NT box, open the cmd prompt and make the following
directories on a Samba share, client100 and client121, both mangle to
CLIEN~GH.

If I create directories client100 through client130 I see 11 clashes
altogether:

CLIEN~GH: client100 client121
CLIEN~MF: client101 client120
CLIEN~4L: client102 client123
CLIEN~AJ: client103 client122
CLIEN~ZP: client104 client125
CLIEN~$N: client105 client124
CLIEN~NT: client106 client127
CLIEN~TR: client107 client126
CLIEN~BX: client108 client129
CLIEN~HV: client109 client128
CLIEN~JG: client110
CLIEN~PE: client111 client130
CLIEN~7K: client112
CLIEN~DI: client113
CLIEN~!O: client114
CLIEN~1M: client115
CLIEN~QS: client116
CLIEN~WQ: client117
CLIEN~EW: client118
CLIEN~KU: client119

All mangling settings in smb.conf are at their default. Is this a known
feature? Does anyone know a workaround?

Thanks,
Dieter
-- 
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Vienna
Dieter  voice:  (+43 1) 4277-14063  University
   Stampfer fax  :  (+43 1) 4277-9140 Computer
snail:  Universitaetsstrasse 7, A-1010 Wien Center






-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Samba-Docu. suggestion

2002-05-23 Thread Martin Thomas


Suggestion for an addition to the Samba-Documentation:

Some people (10?) mailed me about a message I've sent to
the list back in the 2.2.1 days. My problems where 
not caused by Samba but it seems that profile-handling
for W2k clients with a samba server reveals network
problems (hardware or router/switch settings) which
are never noticed with *nix alone (reports came from 
Linux, HPUX and AIX users). I suggested to check
the network and at least 6 people found broken
NICs, Switches or wrong router configurations.
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2001-July/030366.html

Suggestion: "If you see error messages like
'The specified network name is no longer available' or 'error during transfer
of a memory page' check your network-hardware and settings"

I don't know the right translations, in german the messages are:
"Der Netzwerkname is nicht laenger verfuegbar" and
"Fehler beim Einlagern einer Speicherseite"


- Martin



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Printing Question (fwd)

2002-05-23 Thread Joel Hammer

Post the entire output of:
ls -al /usr/local/lprng/current/bin/lpr
Is this in the path of a regular user? Try:
which lpr
with a regular user.

Joel



On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 04:39:38PM -0400, amit deshmukh wrote:
> 
> Can u help with this ? 
> 
> thanks in adavance
> amit
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:36:32 -0400 (EDT)
> From: amit deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: amit deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Printing Question
> 
> 
> I am not using -M option. I am just passing %M with -R for some accounting
> stuff on printing side. I tried removing that also. Still it won't work.
> I am not geting the reason why it doesn't call 'print command' for notmal
> users. I tried using a dummy script. But even the script won't get called.
> I think there is some problem with smb.conf. But I don't know what. I am
> using lanpan style printing as in samba 2.0.*. I am attaching my smb.conf.
> 
> See if u have any clues with that..
> 
> rgds
> Amit
> --
> Amit Deshmukh
> Graduate Student (EECS)
> University of Toledo.
> 
> Contact Address
> ~~~
> 2952, Kendale Drive,
> Apt #202,
> Toledo OH 43606
> Ph. 419-471-9789
> --
> 
> On Thu, 16 May 2002, Joel Hammer wrote:
> 
> > Could it be the improper option -M is preventing lpr from running?
> > Joel
> > 
> > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:50:56PM -0400, amit deshmukh wrote:
> > > Can anybody help with this ? 
> > > 
> > > -- Forwarded message --
> > > Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 11:58:10 -0400 (EDT)
> > > From: amit deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [Samba] Printing Question
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > >   I am using Samba with LPRng. I have in my configuration
> > > 
> > > print command = /usr/local/lprng/current/bin/lpr -P%p %s -R%M
> > > 
> > >   The permissions for lpr are -rwsr-xr-x. 
> > > 
> > >   I am using samba as PDC. With this setup, when I login as a root
> > > in the domain, I can print properly. When I login as a normal user in the
> > > domain from an NT machine, I do not get any prints. The smbprn print spool
> > > file gets created in /servers/samba/printers folder (which is writable as
> > > required by samba printing docs). 
> > >   When I looked into the samba log for a normal user, I do not see a
> > > call made to lpr (which I usually see when it is done from a root accnt).
> > > What I can conclude with this is that if there is any problem then it is
> > > to do with 'lpr' permissions. But, as mentioned earlier these permissions
> > > are enough for printing (a normal user can print from a unix machine
> > > directly)..
> > > 
> > >   Can anybody help me with this ? 
> > > 
> > > thanks in advance
> > > 
> > > rgds
> > > Amit
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Amit Deshmukh
> > > Graduate Student (EECS)
> > > University of Toledo.
> > > 
> > > Contact Address
> > > ~~~
> > > 2952, Kendale Drive,
> > > Apt #202,
> > > Toledo OH 43606
> > > Ph. 419-471-9789
> > > --
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > 
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > 

> [global]
>   interfaces  = X.Y.Z.W
>   bind interfaces only= true
>   workgroup   = MY_PDC
>   server string   = Samba2.2 
>   hosts allow = A.B.C. E.F.G.
> 
>   deadtime= 0 # idle time out
>   getwd cache = yes
>   create mode = 0600
>  
> disable spoolss = yes
>
> printing = lprng
>   load printers   = yes
> 
>   log file= /usr/local/servers/samba/log/log.%m
>   max log size= 1000
> 
>   utmp= true
>   utmp directory  = /var/adm/
>   wtmp directory  = /var/adm/
> 
>   security= user
>   smb passwd file = /usr/local/servers/samba/private/passwd
>   encrypt passwords   = yes
>   username= 0
> 
>   # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details
>   socket options  = TCP_NODELAY 
> 
>   # Use only if you have an NT server on your network that has been
>   # configured at install time to be a primary domain controller.
>   ; domain controller = 
> 
>   # Samba to be a domain logon server for Windows95 workstations. 
>   domain logons  

RE: [Samba] Migration to TNG

2002-05-23 Thread Sean Elble

In my opinion, Samba 2.2.4 should work just as well, if not better than,
Samba-TNG. Samba-TNG is more advanced
in certain areas regarding Windows NT PDC/BDC interoperability, but
Samba-TNG is also lacking in other areas, such
as, IIRC, ACL support.

I can't comment with regard to the "no security info sent" errors, as I have
never experienced that particular
problem. However, you neglected to mention which version of Windows you are
using on the client. If you are using
Windows NT, 2000, or XP Professional with roaming profiles, it is perfectly
understandable for a logoff to take
10 minutes, if not more. I personally have seen roaming profiles balloon to
sizes over 100 megabytes (and then
quickly become local profiles :-)), and those who had profiles that large
would take *FOREVER* to logoff. You might
want to check that, if you have not already. Hope that was of some
assitance.


 Sean P. Elble
 Independent Systems/Network Engineer
 Caldera Accredited Partner
 UNIX/Linux/Windows NT/2000
 SES Computer Systems
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Jan Peuker
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Migration to TNG


Hi list,

as a result of horrible error logs and no sleep I would be able to throw my
smb2.2.4 out of the window and take a phone call to dell for a nt box ...
but I'll try once again.
I know, this is the wrong list, but maybe here I get more Developers. My
simple question is: If my PDC (WinS -> named, system is SuSE 7.3 but newest
versions of all relevant software) won't run as smooth as I've heard of
samba should I switch to TNG?
And if, could I migrate my dirs, user lists, and smb.conf to TNG? I always
get these "no security info sent" errors, even if I turn encrypted passwords
or acl-support off. And even if I don't use it, I compiled with pam and
msfs, nothing solved these problems. Ok, they don't seem to affect anything
else seriously than the warn-log, but I think there should be no cause why a
user needs about 10 minutes to log off, should it? Thanks a lot,

jan


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] AutoCAD file names UPPER CASE on samba

2002-05-23 Thread peter.a.bryant



Hi folks, we are experiencing a problem when AutoCAD 2000+ drawing files
are saved on a Samba (2.0.8) file share.
Regardless of what the file is 'saved as', the name is always converted to all
capitals.
 e.g.  Drawing1 becomes DRAWING1

Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this problem.
Seems strange that it is only AutoCAD files, but I think it is Samba related,
not AutoCAD, since the files save ok on local  drives.

We are using a mixture of NT and 2000 clients.
Samba 2.0.8 is running on Solaris 8 servers.

Any help appreciated.
thanks

-peter.







Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads,
Queensland Transport or National Transport Secretariat, or
endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure.
If you have received this electronic mail message in error,
please immediately notify the sender and delete the message
from your computer.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] p.s. AutoCAD file names UPPER CASE on samba

2002-05-23 Thread peter.a.bryant




p.s. forgot to mention parameter settings for the share we are having problems
with

preserve case = yes


default case   - not set - default = lower
mangle case- not set - default = no



-- Forwarded by Peter A Bryant/EngServ/QMR/Au on 24/05/2002
01:32 PM ---


Peter A Bryant
24/05/2002 01:31 PM

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  AutoCAD file names UPPER CASE on samba

Hi folks, we are experiencing a problem when AutoCAD 2000+ drawing files
are saved on a Samba (2.0.8) file share.
Regardless of what the file is 'saved as', the name is always converted to all
capitals.
 e.g.  Drawing1 becomes DRAWING1

Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this problem.
Seems strange that it is only AutoCAD files, but I think it is Samba related,
not AutoCAD, since the files save ok on local  drives.

We are using a mixture of NT and 2000 clients.
Samba 2.0.8 is running on Solaris 8 servers.

Any help appreciated.
thanks

-peter.









Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads,
Queensland Transport or National Transport Secretariat, or
endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure.
If you have received this electronic mail message in error,
please immediately notify the sender and delete the message
from your computer.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Login Script Error...

2002-05-23 Thread Rajesh Prakasan
Title: Message



 

Hi,
    While running the login script from windows 
clients , I am getting an illegal operation windows after opening the NWLSCON 
window. what can be the problem? Is it windows based? or Linux login script 
error? pls anyone help me.
 
Thanks,
 
Rajesh