[Samba] Problems with lower and uppercase filenames
Hi, I just subscribed to this list to see if I can get a solution to the following problem. I've spent a couple of hours looking though the man pages, google, etc but haven't found a solution. Platform: RedHat 7.3 and Win98SE (in spanish) Samba Version 2.2.3a Ok, the problem is the following. case 1: Let's say I have a unix directory /temp shared through samba. I'm sitting at my windows machine and I can create filenames with upper/lowe/mixed cases and everything works fine case 2: There's a windows shared directory in my windows machine, let's call it MyWinShare I want to access it from unix so I do a mount -t smbfs -o username=joe //WINPUTER/MyWinShare /mnt/winputer/shareit now from the unix shell prompt I can create files in my windows machine with any kind of upper/lower case letters... so far so good... Now I create a samba share: [whatever] path=/mnt/winputer/shareit browseable = yes writable = yes create mask = 0666 directory mask = 0777 preserve case=yes; added this one just in case The problem starts now. When accessing this share from the Windows computer I can see the shared directory (although through an unnecesary loopback which is irrelevant to the problem because it still happens with a different setup without loops). * If I drag and copy a file from the windows explorer, lets say foo.txt, the new file becomes COPY OF FOO.TXT All the characters in uppercase. * If I move the file to another directory in the share, the case is kept. * If I rename a file to fOooOo.tXt, the case is kept. * If I use Notepad and save a new file in the share, it goes all to UPPERCASE!!! * If I use Wordpad, however, it respects the case... * Other programs behave in different ways... The main problem (and what started all this) is that my Java IDE has the all to uppercase problem and if I edit a file and then save it, the filename goes to UPPER which is very bad for a Java filename since it's case sensitive. So I read man smb.conf, man smbmount, etc... and saw parameters for codepages and character sets, and started trying combinations (my windows is in codepage 850 for DOS and codepage 1252 for windows, my /usr/share/samba/codepages has an entry for 1251 but not for 1252...) Nothing new happens with all the codepage changes, the problem persists. Notice that is not a problem of smb itself because other shares work fine, nor of smbmount itself because from the unix prompt I can create files in the windows machine with any case of letter. But smb+smbmount, both together, give this phenomenon!!! any ideas?? I hope this is not too confusing... it's 6:30am already and I can't even type! thanks BarZ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ACT 2000 and Windows XP problem
Hello to All! I've got a problem moving my ACT 2000 database from WinXP to Samba server on Linux. All clients are WinXP systems, Samba 2.2.5 runs on Debian Linux, 2.4.18 kernel. I have a share with ACT database which is connected to all WinXP systems as a mapped network drive. The first client starts ACT successfuly but when I try to launch ACT on the second client it says that ACT database is corrupted or locked by another user. Can I use ACT on Samba share with multiple WinXP/2000 clients? Is it a Samba or Windows error? Thanks in advance, Cyril. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Autoreply to samba digest, Vol 1 #1666 - 7 msgs
Vielen Dank für Ihre e-mail. Da ich vom 30.09.-06.10 in Urlaub bin, kann ich sie leider erst danach bearbeiten bzw. beantworten. In dringenden Fällen, können Sie sich gerne an meinen Kollegen Herrn Lamotte wenden. Er hat die email-Adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] und ist telefonisch unter 07142/596-152 zu erreichen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Michael Müller G. Umbreit GmbH Co.KG -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Mounting Share at Boot Time
I have a Windows share that I would like to mount at boot time, but am uncertain what syntax to use in /etc/fstab. The entry in /etc/mtab is the following: //DELL-4400/linux /root/mnt/DELL-4400/linux smbfs 0 0 Do I just use the same syntax in fstab? Thanks, Barry -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] ACT 2000 and Windows XP problem
Someone far smarter than me might want to elaborate, but I believe the issue is one of two things. First, you need to force users in that share to create files with 0777 mask. When a user opens a database like Act or Access, a lock file is created. If it is 0755, the other users cannot write to the lock file. To confirm this, try signing onto another machine with the same username/password as the first. Can you get in from the second machine with the same username/password? If so, then you are on the right track. Study the man pages about create mask. Secondly, make certain you understand the opportunistic locking settings. You should disable opportunistic locking or your Act database will almost certainly be badly corrupted. Be sure you treat this implementation as beta (backups, etc) until the kinks are ironed out. No sense cursing Samba over a damaged database if the correct procedures aren't followed. Study the man pages about oplocks. I guess I should add a third point, make sure the users all have rwx (0777) permission on the actual unix data directory (as opposed to merely granting Samba permissions). Good luck, Steve - Original Message - From: Cyril Y. Nickonorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 9:13 AM Subject: [Samba] ACT 2000 and Windows XP problem Hello to All! I've got a problem moving my ACT 2000 database from WinXP to Samba server on Linux. All clients are WinXP systems, Samba 2.2.5 runs on Debian Linux, 2.4.18 kernel. I have a share with ACT database which is connected to all WinXP systems as a mapped network drive. The first client starts ACT successfuly but when I try to launch ACT on the second client it says that ACT database is corrupted or locked by another user. Can I use ACT on Samba share with multiple WinXP/2000 clients? Is it a Samba or Windows error? Thanks in advance, Cyril. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba authentication
Each user that needs to access the server will need to be a linux user as well, with unix permissions to access the directory in question. It is best to use user security instead of domain with password synchronization between samba and unix enabled. Any users created in unix will be added to samba. If this becomes an issue (too many users, two systems to maintain), you may want to consider mapping bad usernames to guest, setting the guest user up as a generic user in unix, then allowing guest access to the share. This pretty much opens the share up to everyone, something you may wisn to avoid. This is usually done when deploying Samba as a print server. It avoids administrative overhead. You can also use winbind to synchronize samba permissions with a NT domain. This is beyond me, someone else could step up to help you there. Another thing to consider - the samba user needs to have permissions to access the unix directory. Samba permissions and unix permissions are two distinct issues. You could share a directory in samba that nobody can read, let alone write to from Windows. The individual users need to have access, or better yet the group to which they belong. Conversely, if you map to guest, make certain the guest user has rights to the unix directory. You may want to download Webmin (www.webmin.com). It gives you a nice web-based interface to manage everything. Good luck, Steve - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 6:03 AM Subject: [Samba] Samba authentication Hi, I'm trying to set up samba for the first time. I can already ping the linux machine from a windows machine by its NetBIOS name. But when I try to do \\linux (thats the machine name) it asks me for username and password Here goes my smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = NS netbios name = Linux server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 192.168.69. 127. interfaces = 192.168.69.110/24 log file = /var/log/log.%m max log size = 50 security = domain password server = * encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY os level = 255 wins support = no dns support = no Do I have to create users locally, or say that specific users from the domain can access the server? I haven't created any share yet, might that be a problem too? Thanks in advance... Filipe Joel de ALmeida -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problems with lower and uppercase filenames
Joel Hammer wrote: Does this problem with java occur if you save the file to a local directory? This sounds like samba is working fine. Your applications are changing the case. Joel Hi Joel and everybody, I'll try to explain a little better. First, it's not a problem with Java (I haven't tested any java program on this issue), but something I first noticed when saving files with my Java IDE (programming environment), working from windows on [convoluted] samba share. (I'll explain the [convoluted] part later just for fun, but it's irrelevant to the problem) The setup is: WINPUTER sharing a dir called MyWinShare LINUXPUTER smbmount[ing] //WINPUTER/MyWinShare on the local linux dir /mnt/winputer/shareit LINUXPUTER sharing /mnt/winputer/shareit through samba to the rest of the LAN WINPUTER programs trying to create files on the shareit share that LINUXPUTER publishes (which is actually on WINPUTER to start with, but it doesn't matter!!) When creating a file from Wordpad which is a Microsoft Windows program (nothing to do with java) the files are created with ALLCAPS, no matter how you entered them in the file save dialog box. When creating files from Notepad (M$ program) it respects the capitalisation. When using MS Explorer to drag and copy a file called foobar.txt, the copy becomes COPY OF FOOBAR.TXT When just dragging and moving it keeps the capitalisation. When creating a new file or folder with the windows explorer (right click, New, Folder, text document, etc) or renaming a file, it respects capitalisation. new test I map the shareit share to a drive letter, say P: from a DOS prompt I do P:\ dir eEeEeEe and it keeps capitalisation /new test Now, nothing like this happens from Windows when writing to a regular share that ends up in a normal linux dir (not one that is smbmount[ed] back to a a Windows machine. In the same manner, everything is fine when, from the linux prompt I do a ls eEeEeEEeeeE inside the smbmount[ed] directory. A file with correct capitalisation appears in MyWinShare. But mix the two together and KAPUT ALL CAPS (from some programs, not others!!!) (below is my original post where I explain some of the tests I did with codepages and character sets which yielded no change to this behaviour) explanation on my convulted original setup In my home linux computer I do: ssh -2 -C -f -N -g -L 13900:officePC:139 officeLINUX So I create this SSH tunnel from local linux port 13900 to port 139 in my office PC Then, also in my home linux I do: mount -t smbfs -o username=barspi,port=13900,ip=127.0.0.1,workgroup=OFFICEDOMAIN,fmask=777,dmask=777 //OFFICEPC/MyShare /mnt/office/officepc/MyShare/ So now the home linux dir is mounted to my office PC share I share this local dir with samba and I can access my office PC from any PC inside my home network. Before anyone says it... yes, I know there are things called VPN's and all that... but I haven't had time to download/study those packages and this way let me learn loads of stuff about SSH, samba, etc. and it was fun :-) /explanation on my convulted original setup Thank you all!! BarZ On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:55:25AM -0300, Barzilai Spinak wrote: Hi, I just subscribed to this list to see if I can get a solution to the following problem. I've spent a couple of hours looking though the man pages, google, etc but haven't found a solution. Platform: RedHat 7.3 and Win98SE (in spanish) Samba Version 2.2.3a Ok, the problem is the following. case 1: Let's say I have a unix directory /temp shared through samba. I'm sitting at my windows machine and I can create filenames with upper/lowe/mixed cases and everything works fine case 2: There's a windows shared directory in my windows machine, let's call it MyWinShare I want to access it from unix so I do a mount -t smbfs -o username=joe //WINPUTER/MyWinShare /mnt/winputer/shareit now from the unix shell prompt I can create files in my windows machine with any kind of upper/lower case letters... so far so good... Now I create a samba share: [whatever] path=/mnt/winputer/shareit browseable = yes writable = yes create mask = 0666 directory mask = 0777 preserve case=yes; added this one just in case The problem starts now. When accessing this share from the Windows computer I can see the shared directory (although through an unnecesary loopback which is irrelevant to the problem because it still happens with a different setup without loops). * If I drag and copy a file from the windows explorer, lets say foo.txt, the new file becomes COPY OF FOO.TXT All the characters in uppercase. * If I move the file to another directory in the share, the case is kept. * If I rename a file to fOooOo.tXt, the case is kept. * If I use Notepad and save a new file in the share, it goes all to UPPERCASE!!! * If I use Wordpad, however, it respects the case... * Other programs behave in different ways... The main problem (and what
[Samba] Network-connection breaking
Hello all, yesterday I posted a Problem about the Network.connection. It breaks down and windows is messaging "Thespecified network name is no longer available", when I try to copy a large file or directory. Now I know that this Problem also exists, when I try to delete a large Folder from a W2K machine on the Samba share. What can I do? The message in log.smbd is: !--StartFragment--[2002/09/28 20:52:44, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(436) read_data: read failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer Please help... Cyberduck
RE: [Samba] Samba authentication
Thanks Steve for your time. I'm trying to do everything by hand and without any GUI or wizards, so that I really learn how things work, so I'm having a little more work (specially because I just started using linux this week) but I think that with time it will be better this way. My idea for now is to have a Linux server integrated into a W2K domain, and providing that domain users with files. I have the users in the domain grouped in several groups. Isn't there any way that I, on the linux machine, share folders for a certain group and every user that is created in W2K and added to that group has access to that folder. My problem is that my first production deployment of samba is in a network of 100+ users with some rotativity (lots of users gone, and new come in). I really don't want to have to create each user twice. Can anyone tell me a way to implement this kind of slution? Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: sábado, 28 de Setembro de 2002 17:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba authentication Each user that needs to access the server will need to be a linux user as well, with unix permissions to access the directory in question. It is best to use user security instead of domain with password synchronization between samba and unix enabled. Any users created in unix will be added to samba. If this becomes an issue (too many users, two systems to maintain), you may want to consider mapping bad usernames to guest, setting the guest user up as a generic user in unix, then allowing guest access to the share. This pretty much opens the share up to everyone, something you may wisn to avoid. This is usually done when deploying Samba as a print server. It avoids administrative overhead. You can also use winbind to synchronize samba permissions with a NT domain. This is beyond me, someone else could step up to help you there. Another thing to consider - the samba user needs to have permissions to access the unix directory. Samba permissions and unix permissions are two distinct issues. You could share a directory in samba that nobody can read, let alone write to from Windows. The individual users need to have access, or better yet the group to which they belong. Conversely, if you map to guest, make certain the guest user has rights to the unix directory. You may want to download Webmin (www.webmin.com). It gives you a nice web-based interface to manage everything. Good luck, Steve - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 6:03 AM Subject: [Samba] Samba authentication Hi, I'm trying to set up samba for the first time. I can already ping the linux machine from a windows machine by its NetBIOS name. But when I try to do \\linux (thats the machine name) it asks me for username and password Here goes my smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = NS netbios name = Linux server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 192.168.69. 127. interfaces = 192.168.69.110/24 log file = /var/log/log.%m max log size = 50 security = domain password server = * encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY os level = 255 wins support = no dns support = no Do I have to create users locally, or say that specific users from the domain can access the server? I haven't created any share yet, might that be a problem too? Thanks in advance... Filipe Joel de ALmeida -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Mounting Share at Boot Time
I tried to use this same syntax in fstab that I used in mtab, and the mount failed when I rebooted. Any help with the proper syntax would be appreciated. Thanks, Barry On 09.28.2002 11:31 Barry Skidmore wrote: I have a Windows share that I would like to mount at boot time, but am uncertain what syntax to use in /etc/fstab. The entry in /etc/mtab is the following: //DELL-4400/linux /root/mnt/DELL-4400/linux smbfs 0 0 Do I just use the same syntax in fstab? Thanks, Barry -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Server without Router
Is it possible to for samba to serve without a router on just a HUB, Because I can't get my windows machines to see it without the router If it is, please post the smb.conf file for me. Also, I'm on Suse 7.3 8.0 Thanks, Tony
[Samba] Samba with a Win9x network and RoadRunner
Hi everyone...I'm at a dead stop setting up Samba, so let me jump right into the problem: First, the setup: I have a RH7.3 box and a W98 laptop. The RH box also has a W2k Pro partition. We have them on a 4-port 10base-T hub along with our RoadRunner cable modem. Now on to the problem: As most of you are already aware, RR uses DHCP to assign IP addresses to client machines at boot time. This seems to be causing Samba to have problems resolving the machine names. When I get both machines up and running and try to connect to the laptop (jarjar) with smbclient -L jarjar, I get Connection to jarjar failed. My first question is this: Is there something I have to enable in W98 to allow Samba to make connections? And my second question: Can Samba decide which hostname goes to which computer on my home network without being able to resolve it to an IP address? I would assume that when the machines hold master browser elections, each is made aware of the other(s) and the IP addresses are not necessary. Any help anyone can provide is greatly appreciated. Every time I go to work I have to reboot into W2k so my wife can get at the files on my hard drives. It's annoying. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba with a Win9x network and RoadRunner
I have a similar problem just posted about win98 and samba.I think if you have applied ip address,dns,gateway and added the server ip address in lmhost, there is not anything more to do at the win box. About the second question I have ran tcpdump on my samba server to determine how it communicate with the clients. And I found that on establish the connection from win98 to samba, it uses hostnames and it look to me it also use the nic hardware address. The other way it dont use the hw address, but the hostnames. If this could be to any help. --- DJ Busch [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: Hi everyone...I'm at a dead stop setting up Samba, so let me jump right into the problem: First, the setup: I have a RH7.3 box and a W98 laptop. The RH box also has a W2k Pro partition. We have them on a 4-port 10base-T hub along with our RoadRunner cable modem. Now on to the problem: As most of you are already aware, RR uses DHCP to assign IP addresses to client machines at boot time. This seems to be causing Samba to have problems resolving the machine names. When I get both machines up and running and try to connect to the laptop (jarjar) with smbclient -L jarjar, I get Connection to jarjar failed. My first question is this: Is there something I have to enable in W98 to allow Samba to make connections? And my second question: Can Samba decide which hostname goes to which computer on my home network without being able to resolve it to an IP address? I would assume that when the machines hold master browser elections, each is made aware of the other(s) and the IP addresses are not necessary. Any help anyone can provide is greatly appreciated. Every time I go to work I have to reboot into W2k so my wife can get at the files on my hard drives. It's annoying. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba __ Se den nye Yahoo! Mail på http://no.yahoo.com/ Nytt design, enklere å bruke, alltid tilgang til Adressebok, Kalender og Notisbok -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba as a block device
James- look into 'reparse points' in the microsoft knowledgebase. those will do something similar on windows 2000 and XP. basically you can redirect filesystem calls to a directory path, say C:\foo to another path such as \\samba\share or h:\bar. another option of course is iSCSI which is coming into the daylight now. Donald On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 11:51, James S. Martin wrote: Netapp (a CIFS/NFS NAS solution) has the ability to emulate a physical device and present itself as a local drive to a Windows box over the network. It involves a Windows client side driver as well as some server side stuff to do this. To Windows, the drive appears to be local and not a mapped drive (you can format it/etc) Are there any initiatives to do something like this with Samba? http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/snapdrive.html James -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba and WinXP problem
Run sysprep on the machine and try again. That should change all the RIDS for the machine. Donald On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 10:38, Stacy J.Dunkle wrote: Greets to all, Recently, I was given the task of setting up a Samba server where I work, to accept domain logons for Win9x machines and also NT-based machines, which consist of mostly XP boxes, with a couple 2K machines as well. This domain would be replacing an older one, that was using a very out of date Samba (from RedHat 6.1) that couldn't do XP/2K at all. The new one is from RedHat 7.3, which has v.2.2.3a-6 of Samba. As I have learned in the past, XP can sometimes be a great pain to get to join a Samba domain. This time, however, using what I learned in the past, it went pretty flawlessly. I did my testing mostly on 2 machines, a 2K box, and an XP box. All went well, until it was time for the server to go live. I had to change the domain name on the server, and before doing so, I had the 2 machines un-join the domain, just in case that would cause a problem. After changing the domain name and restarting Samba, I had the machines join the new domain. The 2K box was OK with this, but the XP box, however, was not. I went ahead and prepared the rest of the XP boxes in the building for joining the domain, by changing the signorseal registry entry, adding their machine accounts to Samba, etc., and they all joined the domain just fine, and are doing the domain logon thing perfectly. The original XP box I tested with, though, still gives me problems. It always gives the following error: The following error occurred attempting to join the domain techland: Multiple connections to a server or shared resource by the same user, using more than one username, are not allowed. Disconnect all previous connections to the server or shared resource and try again. The only thing that was changed on the Samba server, was the domain/workgroup name. I'm totally stumped. I've tried changing the netbios name of the XP box, and added the new machine account to the server, and got the same error. I tried refreshing the network adaptor on the XP box, and got the same thing. I tried deleting the machine account from the server and then re-adding it, to no avail. Checking the Samba logs for this particular machine, shows nothing. I even did a tail -f on the log, while trying to have the machine join the domain, and it shows nothing. I searched Google for this problem, and only got one Samba-related hit, and it wasn't quite the same problem I'm experiencing. I'm about ready to wipe the machine and reformat/reinstall XP, but before going to that extreme, I figured I'd try this list. So, does anyone have any ideas? :-) Stace -- Stacy J. Dunkle LAN Manager, Pennswoods.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Groups in ldap and /etc/group?
Hello, Using smbgroupedit, should I link groups to ldap groups, those in /etc/group (if I also would define them in there) or both? Or none? (If using ldap) Eddie.
Compile warnings.
Samba 3.0, compiled on RedHat 7.0 (up to date), 28 September 2002 08:05 CET. Warnings: Compiling smbd/mangle_hash2.c smbd/mangle_hash2.c: In function `cache_insert': smbd/mangle_hash2.c:172: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast smbd/mangle_hash2.c: In function `is_mangled': smbd/mangle_hash2.c:263: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast Compiling libsmb/clispnego.c libsmb/clispnego.c: In function `spnego_gen_negTokenTarg': libsmb/clispnego.c:330: warning: passing arg 1 of `krb5_get_ticket' discards qualifiers from pointer target type Compiling passdb/secrets.c passdb/secrets.c: In function `secrets_fetch': passdb/secrets.c:61: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type passdb/secrets.c: In function `secrets_store': passdb/secrets.c:77: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type passdb/secrets.c:79: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type passdb/secrets.c: In function `secrets_delete': passdb/secrets.c:93: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type passdb/secrets.c: In function `secrets_lock_trust_account_password': passdb/secrets.c:218: warning: passing arg 2 of `tdb_lock_bystring' discards qualifiers from pointer target type passdb/secrets.c:220: warning: passing arg 2 of `tdb_unlock_bystring' discards qualifiers from pointer target type passdb/secrets.c: In function `secrets_get_trusted_domains': passdb/secrets.c:509: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast passdb/secrets.c: In function `secrets_named_mutex': passdb/secrets.c:610: warning: passing arg 1 of `tdb_set_lock_alarm' discards qualifiers from pointer target type Compiling lib/util_str.c lib/util_str.c: In function `str_list_make': lib/util_str.c:1160: warning: passing arg 3 of `next_token' discards qualifiers from pointer target type Compiling lib/util.c lib/util.c: In function `smb_xstrndup': lib/util.c:1832: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast Compiling lib/gencache.c lib/gencache.c: In function `gencache_get': lib/gencache.c:248: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast lib/gencache.c: In function `gencache_iterate': lib/gencache.c:303: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast Compiling libads/ldap.c libads/ldap.c: In function `ads_do_paged_search': libads/ldap.c:405: warning: passing arg 2 of `str_list_copy' from incompatible pointer type libads/ldap.c: In function `ads_do_search': libads/ldap.c:631: warning: passing arg 2 of `str_list_copy' from incompatible pointer type Compiling libads/ldap_printer.c libads/ldap_printer.c: In function `ads_mod_printer_entry': libads/ldap_printer.c:80: warning: passing arg 4 of `ads_mod_strlist' from incompatible pointer type libads/ldap_printer.c:96: warning: passing arg 4 of `ads_mod_strlist' from incompatible pointer type libads/ldap_printer.c:99: warning: passing arg 4 of `ads_mod_strlist' from incompatible pointer type Compiling libads/kerberos.c libads/kerberos.c: In function `kerberos_kinit_password': libads/kerberos.c:80: warning: passing arg 6 of `krb5_get_init_creds_password' discards qualifiers from pointer target type Compiling utils/net_ads.c utils/net_ads.c: In function `net_ads_printer_info': utils/net_ads.c:722: warning: passing arg 4 of `ads_find_printer_on_server' discards qualifiers from pointer target type utils/net_ads.c: In function `net_ads_printer_publish': utils/net_ads.c:774: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type utils/net_ads.c: In function `net_ads_printer_remove': utils/net_ads.c:812: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type Compiling utils/net_rpc_join.c utils/net_rpc_join.c: In function `net_rpc_join_ok': utils/net_rpc_join.c:65: warning: passing arg 1 of `secrets_fetch_trust_account_password' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
Re: Groups in ldap and /etc/group?
Eddie Lania wrote: Hello, Using smbgroupedit, should I link groups to ldap groups, those in /etc/group (if I also would define them in there) or both? Or none? (If using ldap) the groups are stored in the group_mapping.tdb... I think mapping is unix--NT, but not LDAP groups (perhaps with nsswitch...) Ignacio -- Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTI, Director fax:948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAINhttp://www.unav.es/cti/
LDAP schema updates: How to deal with?
I have been running LDAP based Samba PDCs since more than half a year now with great success (Thanks Samba team!). There have been some changes in the LDAP schema for Samba (I think mostly OID changes). Are there any special actions needed when switching the old LDAP schema with a new one (dumping out the LDAP database and rereading it etc.)? BTW just keeping the old schema with a fresh SAMBA_2_2 build seems to work fine (until now ;). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NT password change through smblib
Hi, I am using smblib 0.50. I have a NT PDC. I would like to change the password form Linuxbox running a webserver. I tried using the test program. It works with admin password. But does not work with normal user password. The programe test_password returns 2466 status when tried to change the password. The status is returned by SMBapi_NetUserPasswordSet function call. Please advice if any thing else to be done. Thanks in advance, Balagurumoorthy.s __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
Re: NT password change through smblib
balagurumoorthy shanmuganathan wrote: Hi, I am using smblib 0.50. I have a NT PDC. I would like to change the password form Linuxbox running a webserver. I tried using the test program. It works with admin password. But does not work with normal user password. The programe test_password returns 2466 status when tried to change the password. The status is returned by SMBapi_NetUserPasswordSet function call. Please advice if any thing else to be done. Use pam_winbind and winbindd. I use it with the Authen::PAM perl module to great effect. (Assumes you mean a user changing their own password). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Do we need sam/api.c?
I was wondering: In the new SAM stuff do we really need the api.c? Why not make the api the context_ functions, and use the default context if the user does not specify one (ie NULL)? This would remove one layer from this whole area, which might make it easier to comprehend... In the passdb stuff, we needed the outer layer due to need need for source-level compatibility. But we are going to have to change the callers anyway, so why not reduce some complexity along the way? That would make it 'user - context - backend', which might be easier for potential developers to swallow. It would also make samtest magicly 'work' before you specify a context, rather than segfaulting... Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: NT password change through smblib
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, balagurumoorthy shanmuganathan wrote: Hi, I am using smblib 0.50. I have a NT PDC. I would like to change the password form Linuxbox running a webserver. I tried using the test program. Please don't. That code is ancient. There are plenty of better ways to do that now, including PAM, I believe. It works with admin password. But does not work with normal user password. The programe test_password returns 2466 status when tried to change the password. The status is returned by SMBapi_NetUserPasswordSet function call. Please advice if any thing else to be done. Thanks in advance, Balagurumoorthy.s __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AFS support
I am working on adding sys resolving code to Samba to support that meta-token in AFS, to handle retrieving files from AFS filespace through Samba while still being able to use the client system platform identifier rather than the one from the Samba server itself. The customer that is interested in this (and who supports submitting the patch to the Samba maintainers 100%) would like to hear some form of opinion from the Samba maintainers on whether they would be opposed to adding in such a patch or not (of course with the condition that the implementation has to be done in an way that is acceptable to the maintainers, etc...). Is anyone here willing to state whether you'd be open to possibly accepting a patch for this in Samba? If so, only for the 3.x series (CVS version) or is it also possible for 2.x? Thanks, Kris Van Hees PS: I also have the intention to later work on dealing with authentication and permission issues against an AFS file space store that Samba serves from, but that is currently way out of scope for this.
Re: AFS support
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Kris Van Hees wrote: I am working on adding @sys resolving code to Samba to support that meta-token in AFS, to handle retrieving files from AFS filespace through Samba while still being able to use the client system platform identifier rather than the one from the Samba server itself. The customer that is interested in this (and who supports submitting the patch to the Samba maintainers 100%) would like to hear some form of opinion from the Samba maintainers on whether they would be opposed to adding in such a patch or not (of course with the condition that the implementation has to be done in an way that is acceptable to the maintainers, etc...). Is anyone here willing to state whether you'd be open to possibly accepting a patch for this in Samba? If so, only for the 3.x series (CVS version) or is it also possible for 2.x? Kris, We will be open to accepting this patch, because it will mean more people can use the software. We will look over the patch and would want that it be conditionally compiled, but let's see your patch first. Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Do we need sam/api.c?
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 12:56:29AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote about 'Do we need sam/api.c?': I was wondering: In the new SAM stuff do we really need the api.c? Why not make the api the context_ functions, and use the default context if the user does not specify one (ie NULL)? This would remove one layer from this whole area, which might make it easier to comprehend... Yeah, that's a *really* good idea! Every layer less (that's not necessary) is a good thing (TM)! That would make it 'user - context - backend', which might be easier for potential developers to swallow. It would also make samtest magicly 'work' before you specify a context, rather than segfaulting... Oops.. :-) Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pending (unfinished) patches http://samba.org/~jelmer/diffs.php
Re: Groups in ldap and /etc/group?
Eddie The answer to this really depends on what it is that you are trying to do and how you want to manage your site. Which comes back to people and processes more than anything else. Strictly speaking Samba use of LDAP and Unix use of LDAP for user account data have absolutely nothing to do with one another. For instance, you could quite easily have Samba data in LDAP and Unix data in NIS. The tie between the two for users is the username and for groups is the group_mapping.tdb file. The smbldap-tools (we are talking about he Idealx tools right?) assume that a solution design decision has been made to store both Unix and Samba user account data in LDAP and do what is necessary to support this. If then you are trying to do things the Idealx way (and I currently am) and use the smbldap-tools package, then you are correct, in that existing Unix users in /etc/passwd who also need to use Samba will need to have their Unix account data moved to LDAP. I haven't needed to look at doing this myself, but here are a couple of ideas. 1) Create the user with smbldap-useradd and then use something else to change the uidNumber attribute (and what ever alse needs changing) to the current /etc/passwd values. If you are just testing a few users, use an LDAP browser to do it by hand. I use gq. If you are looking at a lot of users write a script to do it. Delete the user from passwd, shadow and group files as required when you are ready. 2) If you are talking about a lot users then use a modified smbldap-useradd script that reads the /etc/passwd file and uses the data from there to fill in the values in the posixAccount object rather than generating new stuff. Hope that this helps. Mike On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 22:41, Eddie Lania wrote: Hi Mike, Thank you for your response. It makes sense to me. And your solution is exactly as I have done it so far. However, there still is one problem to be solved. When I have defined the groups I wish to use for Samba in the ldap database, then I still need to know how to handle existing (unix) users. When my passd backend is the ldap database, I will have to add them in there too (for their password), right? But when I do this, they are assigned a new uid and gid number. I can't figure out how to solve this. The user has to be in ldap for his ntpasswd, home directory, profile directory, etc. Is the only option to add a new username for samba purposes only? Weird.. Eddie. - Original Message - From: Mike Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Eddie Lania [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:25 AM Subject: Re: Groups in ldap and /etc/group? Eddie I have been through this and think that I understand it, so here goes. Someone correct me if I am wrong. First of all, as of 3.0Alpha19 (I haven't looked at 20 yet) Samba does not store group data in LDAP as such. Samba Groups (meaning NT Domain and local Groups) are mapped to Unix groups using the smbgroupedit command. The Unix groups may be stored where ever /etc/nsswitch.conf says they are (files, LDAP, NIS, ...). The smbldap-groupadd.pl script is actually adding a Unix group, not a Samba group. So, for Samba to use the Unix groups that you have added in LDAP you first need to install and configure nss_ldap. You then need to use smbgroupedit to map the Samba group to the Unix group. I hope that that all made sense. By the way the documentaton for smbgroupedit is way out of date. Have a look at the source for the actual options. Mike On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:37, Eddie Lania wrote: Hello, Using smbgroupedit, should I link groups to ldap groups, those in /etc/group (if I also would define them in there) or both? Or none? (If using ldap) Eddie.
Re: Samba 3.0 A2 LDAP
This has been around for a while. A fix that seems to work (at least it seems
to for me) has been posted more than once to the list. I do not know why it
hasn't been applied.
It is simple to fix. In utils/testparm.c file;
Change line 54:
if (lp_wins_support() wins_srv_count()) {
to:
if (lp_wins_support() lp_wins_server_list()) {
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 03:52, Dennis Lattka wrote:
I have a developement server running version 3.0alpha21cvs and am trying
to set it up as a PDC using LDAP to authenticate.
testparm reads the following:
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Processing section [homes]
Processing section [printers]
Processing section [home]
Loaded services file OK.
ERROR: both 'wins support = true' and 'wins server = server' cannot be
set in the smb.conf file. nmbd will abort with this setting.
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = AVLSI
netbios name = DEVEL
netbios aliases = Devel
obey pam restrictions = Yes
password server = ldap.example.com
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/sbin/ldappasswd
unix password sync = Yes
lanman auth = No
log level = 3
syslog = 3
log file = /var/log/samba
name resolve order = dns wins bcast
time server = Yes
logon path = \\home\home\user\%U\WINDOWS
logon drive = U:
logon home = \\home\home\user\%U
domain logons = Yes
domain master = True
dns proxy = No
wins support = Yes
ldap suffix = dc=example,dc=com
ldap machine suffix = ou=System,dc=example,dc=com
ldap user suffix = ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com
ldap passwd sync = Yes
oplocks = No
level2 oplocks = No
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
browseable = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No
[home]
comment = Home Directories
path = /home/
guest ok = Yes
hosts allow = 10.0.0.0/255.255.0.0
There seems to be an issue with WINS as well as it does not seem to be
able to contact the ldap server.
(Making it difficult to do much of anything.) For the developement team,
I am more than happy to run whatever tests you may wish and look forward
to sending whatever feedback there may be, at your request. Thank you.
Dennis
(no subject)
Hi Andrew, I've updated my sam_ads module can you merge the changes to HEAD? metze - Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sam_ads merge
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: Hi Andrew, I've updated my sam_ads module can you merge the changes to HEAD? Done. Kai: I'll take your sam_passdb stuff in as soon as you like - it's easier to track if we keep it all in CVS. (Yes, the bar on 'must be fully functional' is lower while the SAM is being developed - but once we start hooking into the rest of Samba I'll get very strict, on both new and existing code...) Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: AFS support
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 03:00:27PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Kris Van Hees wrote: Description of sys patch omitted. That would very much depend on what you are proposing. This kind of thing is quite difficult with encrypted passwords, and I am generally opposed to adding this kind of thing to our plaintext code, unless it's done *very* cleanly. Hint: Don't add more stuff to pass_check.c. The change we need to make does not involve authentication in any way. It is entirely limited to path and file name resolving based on the client machine platform (as determined by the remote architecture variable). For the purpose of this particular patch, the assumption has been made that all files that need to be accessed will be accessible by the Samba server without requiring it to authenticate the client user against AFS. As mentioned below, that may be something that we need to do in the future, but for now I prefer to stay out of that arena :) A patch submitted to us should be for 3.0 or HEAD, becouse we are trying to rid ourselves of 2.2 maintainece. Then that is definitely what I will submit. PS: I also have the intention to later work on dealing with authentication and permission issues against an AFS file space store that Samba serves from, but that is currently way out of scope for this. I honestly don't see how you will avoid this. BTW, you should have a look at the previous efforts in this area - there have been many. Sombody posted a list of patches to the list a while back. As mentioned above, the sys substitution logic is not dependent on any user authentication information. I have done work in this area before, but it was abandoned due to other priorities. But I envision that it might be picking up again. I definitely will continue looking at the previous efforts in this area (the ones that are present in the current code base do little more than verifying the user's identity - not authentication for the purpose of being able to access AFS space *as* that user). But as I said, that is definitely something for the future, and it is not related to the sys work. Kris
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Sat Sep 28 12:09:21 2002 Author: abartlet Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5714/passdb Modified Files: secrets.c Log Message: Add const. Revisions: secrets.c 1.46 = 1.47 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/secrets.c?r1=1.46r2=1.47
CVS update: samba/source
Date: Sat Sep 28 12:27:04 2002 Author: abartlet Update of /data/cvs/samba/source In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6117 Modified Files: Makefile.in Log Message: Add the beginings of sam_ads to the tree. This module, primarilly the work of Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED], uses the Active Directory schema to store the user/group/other information. I've been testing it against a real AD server, and it is intended to work with OpenLDAP as well. I've moved a few functions around in our other libads code, which has made it easier to tap into that existing code. Also, I've made some changes to the SAM interface, I hope there are not too many objections... To ensure we don't get silly bugs in the skel module, it is now in the default compile. This way you should not forget to update it :-) Andrew Bartlett Revisions: Makefile.in 1.544 = 1.545 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/Makefile.in?r1=1.544r2=1.545
CVS update: samba/source/torture
Date: Sat Sep 28 12:27:04 2002 Author: abartlet Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/torture In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6117/torture Modified Files: cmd_sam.c Log Message: Add the beginings of sam_ads to the tree. This module, primarilly the work of Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED], uses the Active Directory schema to store the user/group/other information. I've been testing it against a real AD server, and it is intended to work with OpenLDAP as well. I've moved a few functions around in our other libads code, which has made it easier to tap into that existing code. Also, I've made some changes to the SAM interface, I hope there are not too many objections... To ensure we don't get silly bugs in the skel module, it is now in the default compile. This way you should not forget to update it :-) Andrew Bartlett Revisions: cmd_sam.c 1.7 = 1.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/torture/cmd_sam.c?r1=1.7r2=1.8
CVS update: samba/source/libads
Date: Sat Sep 28 12:27:04 2002 Author: abartlet Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libads In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6117/libads Modified Files: ads_ldap.c ads_struct.c ldap.c ldap_utils.c Log Message: Add the beginings of sam_ads to the tree. This module, primarilly the work of Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED], uses the Active Directory schema to store the user/group/other information. I've been testing it against a real AD server, and it is intended to work with OpenLDAP as well. I've moved a few functions around in our other libads code, which has made it easier to tap into that existing code. Also, I've made some changes to the SAM interface, I hope there are not too many objections... To ensure we don't get silly bugs in the skel module, it is now in the default compile. This way you should not forget to update it :-) Andrew Bartlett Revisions: ads_ldap.c 1.1 = 1.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libads/ads_ldap.c?r1=1.1r2=1.2 ads_struct.c1.18 = 1.19 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libads/ads_struct.c?r1=1.18r2=1.19 ldap.c 1.79 = 1.80 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libads/ldap.c?r1=1.79r2=1.80 ldap_utils.c1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libads/ldap_utils.c?r1=1.2r2=1.3
Re: CVS update: samba/source/auth
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 07:56:20PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back our volker's patch as was breaking the build.
Sorry for breaking it. On my machine it compiled well
Not as actually commited - you had an undeclared variable in there.
, I even tested against
smbclient, NT4 and W2k. At least on Linux with shadow passwords you do not get
the password salt from /etc/passwd but from /etc/shadow. On my machine an 'x'
ended up in the salt, which was definitely not what crypt wanted to see.
What kind of fix do you propose? Changing to a default of encrypted passwords
should IMHO not mean we do not support plaintext at all anymore.
I don't mind fixing it - I was mainly worried about the compile
failure. Things that don't compile don't ususally look tested ;-)
I also just want to look over it carefully, as much for my own benifit
in understanding this crazy stuff.
How is this for a better patch?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
? auth/auth_ntlmssp.c
Index: auth/pass_check.c
===
RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/auth/pass_check.c,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -r1.34 pass_check.c
--- auth/pass_check.c 27 Sep 2002 23:56:20 - 1.34
+++ auth/pass_check.c 28 Sep 2002 12:48:37 -
@@ -634,6 +634,7 @@
/* Also the place to keep the 'password' no matter what
crazy struct it started in... */
fstrcpy(this_crypted, pass-pw_passwd);
+ fstrcpy(this_salt, pass-pw_passwd);
#ifdef HAVE_GETSPNAM
{
@@ -645,8 +646,10 @@
perhaps for IPC password changing requests */
spass = getspnam(pass-pw_name);
- if (spass spass-sp_pwdp)
+ if (spass spass-sp_pwdp) {
fstrcpy(this_crypted, spass-sp_pwdp);
+ fstrcpy(this_salt, spass-sp_pwdp);
+ }
}
#elif defined(IA_UINFO)
{
@@ -703,9 +706,6 @@
}
}
#endif
-
- /* extract relevant info */
- fstrcpy(this_salt, pass-pw_passwd);
#if defined(HAVE_TRUNCATED_SALT)
/* crypt on some platforms (HPUX in particular)
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Sat Sep 28 20:06:42 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5688/libsmb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 libsmbclient.c Log Message: Include ../include/libsmbclient.h instead of just libsmbclient.h - we don't want to include the globally installed libsmbclient.h - found by jht Revisions: libsmbclient.c 1.50.2.2 = 1.50.2.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/libsmbclient.c?r1=1.50.2.2r2=1.50.2.3
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Sat Sep 28 20:09:30 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5912/libsmb Modified Files: libsmbclient.c Log Message: Include ../include/libsmbclient.h instead of just libsmbclient.h - we don't want to include the globally installed libsmbclient.h - found by jht Revisions: libsmbclient.c 1.59 = 1.60 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/libsmbclient.c?r1=1.59r2=1.60
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Sat Sep 28 20:44:23 2002 Author: jht Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8614 Modified Files: libsmb_cache.c libsmb_compat.c Log Message: Fixing path to libsmbclient.h so it never gets crossed with a system installed one. Revisions: libsmb_cache.c 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/libsmb_cache.c?r1=1.3r2=1.4 libsmb_compat.c 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/libsmb_compat.c?r1=1.2r2=1.3
CVS update: samba/source/torture
Date: Sat Sep 28 21:17:34 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/torture In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10412/torture Modified Files: cmd_sam.c Log Message: Patch from metze to fix enum_accounts Revisions: cmd_sam.c 1.8 = 1.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/torture/cmd_sam.c?r1=1.8r2=1.9
CVS update: samba/source/sam
Date: Sat Sep 28 22:54:16 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/sam In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20186/sam Modified Files: interface.c Log Message: Fix typos + report FIXME Revisions: interface.c 1.17 = 1.18 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/sam/interface.c?r1=1.17r2=1.18
CVS update: samba/source/torture
Date: Sat Sep 28 22:58:44 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/torture In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20430/torture Modified Files: cmd_sam.c Log Message: Fix 'plugin' command Revisions: cmd_sam.c 1.9 = 1.10 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/torture/cmd_sam.c?r1=1.9r2=1.10
Re: CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Sat Sep 28 21:42:51 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11934/libsmb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 libsmb_cache.c libsmb_compat.c Log Message: Change libsmbclient.h - ../include/libsmbclient.h in 3.0 as well This is probably the wrong fix. The right fix is to have -Iinclude at the right place on CFLAGS or CPPFLAGS or whereever. Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVS update: samba/source/sam
Jelmer Vernooij wrote: On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 10:26:19AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'CVS update: samba/source/sam': I need to work out with Jelmer an appropriate way to ensure we still have an example external build, and if this should move back out again. What 'example external build' do you mean ? Well, when sam_skel was in examples, we had somthing people could start with to build a plugin, without much modification. If I build sam_skel as part of the normal build, we don't have this example any more... Perhaps we should just put the makefile in source/sam/ ? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: CVS update: samba/source/sam
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 10:01:33AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote about 'Re: CVS update: samba/source/sam': Jelmer Vernooij wrote: On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 10:26:19AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'CVS update: samba/source/sam': I need to work out with Jelmer an appropriate way to ensure we still have an example external build, and if this should move back out again. What 'example external build' do you mean ? Well, when sam_skel was in examples, we had somthing people could start with to build a plugin, without much modification. If I build sam_skel as part of the normal build, we don't have this example any more... Perhaps we should just put the makefile in source/sam/ ? I think we should probably have make rules in the Makefile in source/ to build plugins. These modules shouldn't be built by default(make all) - so one has to type make plugins/sam_ads.so or make sam/sam_ads.so to compile it.. Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pending (unfinished) patches http://samba.org/~jelmer/diffs.php
Re: CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Jelmer Vernooij wrote: On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 10:07:40AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote about 'Re: CVS update: samba/source/libsmb': On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Sat Sep 28 21:42:51 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11934/libsmb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 libsmb_cache.c libsmb_compat.c Log Message: Change libsmbclient.h - ../include/libsmbclient.h in 3.0 as well This is probably the wrong fix. The right fix is to have -Iinclude at the right place on CFLAGS or CPPFLAGS or whereever. No. Some distributions (for example, debian), put a libsmbclient.h file in /usr/include. stdio.h/unistd.h/etc come from this directory as well, so we can't exclude it.. What Richard means is put *our* -Iinclude before the system -I/usr/include in the CFLAGS. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
CVS update: samba/source/sam
Date: Sun Sep 29 01:01:44 2002 Author: abartlet Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/sam In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28354/sam Modified Files: sam_ads.c Log Message: Updates for sam_ads by metze - add the start of domain policy searching, and a small fix for the previous merge. Andrew Bartlett Revisions: sam_ads.c 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/sam/sam_ads.c?r1=1.2r2=1.3
Re: CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 10:07:40AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote about 'Re: CVS update: samba/source/libsmb': On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Sat Sep 28 21:42:51 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11934/libsmb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 libsmb_cache.c libsmb_compat.c Log Message: Change libsmbclient.h - ../include/libsmbclient.h in 3.0 as well This is probably the wrong fix. The right fix is to have -Iinclude at the right place on CFLAGS or CPPFLAGS or whereever. No. Some distributions (for example, debian), put a libsmbclient.h file in /usr/include. stdio.h/unistd.h/etc come from this directory as well, so we can't exclude it.. Oops, I meant -I./include ... :-) Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVS update: samba/source/sam
Date: Sun Sep 29 06:07:58 2002 Author: abartlet Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/sam In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14761/sam Modified Files: interface.c Removed Files: api.c Log Message: Remove sam/api.c. In order to reduce complexity, this patch removes the upper layer of the SAM API. Also, we remove the function pointers on the sam context - there really is no point making these replaceable - that's for the modules. Move a number of functions in include/interface.c around to allow for use of 'static' and to keep the external API in one chunk, at the bottem. All these functions were renamed to remove the context_sam - sam Consequential changes in the samtest module, and back out metze's change for ACB filtering, becouse I think it belongs in the SAM backeds. (But I will take debate on this one). Changes to the lib/util_sid.c code to create a 'system' token, and make it a SAM_ASSERT() enforced requirement to have a token on those calls that specify it. samtest now uses this. We should have a samtest call to set your own token. We also need to extend our se_access code to cover the things that Win2k is returning in it's access tokens. Currently our system token doesn't pass, due to unexpected flags. (When running sam_ads against Win2k) Andrew Bartlett Revisions: interface.c 1.18 = 1.19 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/sam/interface.c?r1=1.18r2=1.19 api.c 1.5 = NONE http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/sam/api.c?rev=1.5
CVS update: samba/source/torture
Date: Sun Sep 29 06:07:58 2002 Author: abartlet Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/torture In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14761/torture Modified Files: cmd_sam.c samtest.c Log Message: Remove sam/api.c. In order to reduce complexity, this patch removes the upper layer of the SAM API. Also, we remove the function pointers on the sam context - there really is no point making these replaceable - that's for the modules. Move a number of functions in include/interface.c around to allow for use of 'static' and to keep the external API in one chunk, at the bottem. All these functions were renamed to remove the context_sam - sam Consequential changes in the samtest module, and back out metze's change for ACB filtering, becouse I think it belongs in the SAM backeds. (But I will take debate on this one). Changes to the lib/util_sid.c code to create a 'system' token, and make it a SAM_ASSERT() enforced requirement to have a token on those calls that specify it. samtest now uses this. We should have a samtest call to set your own token. We also need to extend our se_access code to cover the things that Win2k is returning in it's access tokens. Currently our system token doesn't pass, due to unexpected flags. (When running sam_ads against Win2k) Andrew Bartlett Revisions: cmd_sam.c 1.10 = 1.11 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/torture/cmd_sam.c?r1=1.10r2=1.11 samtest.c 1.11 = 1.12 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/torture/samtest.c?r1=1.11r2=1.12
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Sun Sep 29 06:07:58 2002 Author: abartlet Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14761/lib Modified Files: util_sid.c Log Message: Remove sam/api.c. In order to reduce complexity, this patch removes the upper layer of the SAM API. Also, we remove the function pointers on the sam context - there really is no point making these replaceable - that's for the modules. Move a number of functions in include/interface.c around to allow for use of 'static' and to keep the external API in one chunk, at the bottem. All these functions were renamed to remove the context_sam - sam Consequential changes in the samtest module, and back out metze's change for ACB filtering, becouse I think it belongs in the SAM backeds. (But I will take debate on this one). Changes to the lib/util_sid.c code to create a 'system' token, and make it a SAM_ASSERT() enforced requirement to have a token on those calls that specify it. samtest now uses this. We should have a samtest call to set your own token. We also need to extend our se_access code to cover the things that Win2k is returning in it's access tokens. Currently our system token doesn't pass, due to unexpected flags. (When running sam_ads against Win2k) Andrew Bartlett Revisions: util_sid.c 1.60 = 1.61 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/util_sid.c?r1=1.60r2=1.61
