[Samba] ÄãÕÒµ½ÁËÂð£¿
µ½ÕâÀï¿´¿´°Éhttp://www.coolzz.com/?id=dasenlind -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ÄãÕÒµ½ÁËÂð£¿
µ½ÕâÀï¿´¿´°Éhttp://www.coolzz.com/?id=dasenlind -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Newsletter Vol 1 Issue 12: Safety For Children On The Web & Virus Protection
SAFETY FOR CHILDREN ON THE WEB Compliments of www.milfordpc.com, PC and Network services with over 10 years of Technical Experience "Cyberprowlers" know that children today are computer savvy, and know that they generally are very trusting of people. They use this knowledge to befriend them, and can be dangerous if they learn information about who the child is, where s/he lives, or tries to arrange a meeting. If you have children, check some of the sites listed below. General Guidelines * Teach your children about safety online; children should never give out personal information such as full name, address, birth date, phone number, where they go to school or other identifying information * Monitor your childrens' online activity; know what they do online. Let children know you are not being nosy; that you are only trying to protect them * Don't place a computer that is attached to the Internet in a child's bedroom; keep wired computers in a main area in the house where online problems can be easily detected * Research children-friendly aides such as monitors (which can tell you where your child has visited), filters (which prevent your child from visiting sites based on various criteria), Internet service providers (ISPs) with child-friendly access, and suggesting children use child-friendly search engines such as www.yahooligans.com. Quick Tips What you should do if you are infected by a computer bug Turn off all active shares (file sharing)that you are running on your computer so that your computer is not accessible on the department network. Do not send any emails prior to resolving this issue. Identify the virus - most computer viruses can be identified by simply running a virus detection program like McAfee VirusScan. Download a copy from OIT's website now if you do not have one. (note: the download link will only work if you are on campus). Find a solution - please take a moment and visit http://vil.nai.com/vil/default.asp. McAfee puts up a exhuastive list of computer viruses and directions to eradicating them. Please note that though most solutions don't require you to use McAfee's VirusScan product, we recommend that you uninstall any other virus detection program and install McAfee's. Contact us immediately if you are unable to perform these tasks. Make sure you power down (shut-off) your PC and unplug the network cable from the computer and/or the wall jack. What you can do to keep your computer safe Like any rational system the prevention of a problem is much desirable to finding it's solution. We have provided the following checklist that our clients may use as a guideline to protect themselves from various computer attacks. [ ] Turn off File Sharing if you do not need it. By default file sharing is turn on automatically when you install Microsoft Windows NT/2000/XP. Most people do not need to share files but they may need to access them from other people. Turning file sharing off will not hamper your ability to access other computers on the network and collect data. [ ] Do not share the root of your main drives. The C: drive is usually the main drive in windows machines because this is where the system files are stored. Sharing the whole drive is not recommended as it makes it easier for these files to be corrupted or possibly deleted remotely. We advice that you create a folder in this drive and share only that folder on the network. Once again root shares are default in Windows NT/2000 for logical reasons that do not apply to most users. [ ] Password protect your shared folders (when possible). [ ] Make sure you have a virus detection program. You can download McAfee VirusScan from OIT (highly recommended) [ ] Firewall anyone? For extra security you could purchase or download firewall software. A firewall closes all the entry points to your computer and don't restrict access. In its simple form it will make your computer invisible to the network and internet. The side effect is that you will not be able to access your computer remotely in most cases. A good freeware firewall program is Sygate Personal Firewall. Download this from TUCOWS.com. Compliments of www.milfordpc.com, PC and Network services with over 10 years of Technical Experience -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba too slow with many little file
I use samba v.2.2.3a-12 available in debian 3.0 to share file for some win98 client. The kernel version is the 2.4.19 installed by me (not debian inst. method) I had make no change to the default smb.conf only the few to start the service by using swat A Win program can load a "cam project" much faster when files are share by Win98. The samba performance is about five time less than Win98 sharing method but only when the "cam program" need to load many litte file in the same time. I think that this problem is due many file (like 30.000) with few kbyte of data in the same folder or a netbios relvol timeout but i don't know setting to resolv this problem. To copy a single 18Mbyte file the transfert rate is very good but when i try to copy all 30.000 file (approx 18Mbyte of data) the system take about 10 minute. - The cpu is a P III 800 with 128Mbyte RAM, 20Gbyte Disk EIDE and RTL8139 NIC - All nic works with 100Mbit half duplex speed. - All ip address of client are into hosts file and no nameserver exist (the ip alias name differ from client name) - The file resolv.conf il empy - There are no other server service - all the file are forced to the same user an same group - every workstation can browse all directory without problem tanks in advance. Gio -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] If you love Italian food, I have one word for you . . .
Title: If you love Italian food, I have one word for you . . . Dear Friend, Mangia! And what better way to enjoy Italian food than with a set of lovely, hand painted bowls imported for you straight from Italy? These sturdy, colorful ceramic bowls are like Italian food itself -- genuine, spicy, colorful and handcrafted! The design features Italian folk dancers to make your spirits bright -- as if you need help in that department when youre enjoying a pasta feast! These lovely bowls can brighten your next meal, just as The Magazine of La Cucina Italiana does. Discover a new insight into the world of Italian cuisine, travel and culture, and get a completely RISK-FREE trial to The Magazine of La Cucina Italiana, plus you may also receive these hand painted Italian bowls if you act quickly at: http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=37919890&siteid=40109846&bfpage=bowls Discover cuisine and a lifestyle straight from the old country. In every issue of The Magazine of La Cucina Italiana, you get: Kitchen-tested recipes youve never tasted before Color photos and step-by-step instruction The best wine selections Suggested menus from appetizer to dessert One-hour meals Ideas for living with Italian style Recipe index for all your issues Techniques and secrets from the great chefs Its like having an Italian chef living in your home! And of course you may also receive these wonderful bowls, fit for an Italian king and perfect for your cacciatore, linguini, marinara, trenette, farfalle, rigatoni The set of six heirloom bowls is a $99.99 value, but it could be yours FREE, if you act quickly at: http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=37919890&siteid=40109846&bfpage=bowls Once youve tasted what The Magazine of La Cucina Italiana can do for your meals and your lifestyle, youll never want to give it up! If you choose to subscribe, youll be eligible for our guaranteed low price of just $24 for 6 issues. Thats a 33% savings off the cover price! Try http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=37919890&siteid=40109846&bfpage=bowls right now and bring Italian warmth and zest into your life! You have nothing to lose but the boredom of ordinary food. Sincerely, William O. Riley Editor-in-Chief Best of Blue Dolphin P.S. This is a completely RISK-FREE offer. If you should decide not to continue your RISK-FREE trial subscription for any reason, you may keep any issues or gifts you may have received with our compliments. Your satisfaction is always guaranteed. Get your RISK-FREE trial right now: http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=37919890&siteid=40109846&bfpage=bowls This message was sent to address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remove yourself from this recurring list by: sending a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]OR Sending a postal mail to CustomerService, 364 Patteson Drive # 312, Morgantown, WV 26505
[Samba] Problem with character mappings, underscore, and smbfs
Hello, I have a problem accessing certain files on a Win2000 server either through smbfs or smbclient on Linux. In a certain directory, smbfs mounted filesystem shows via ls: Dicom 3.0 Conformance Statement - ViewPoint-Voyager 6.0 2.doc Dicom 3.0 Conformance Statement - ViewPoint-Voyager 6.0.doc But if I try to access any of these files it fails: cp Dicom\ 3.0\ Conformance\ Statement\ -\ ViewPoint-Voyager\ 6.0.doc /tmp/ cp: cannot stat `Dicom 3.0 Conformance Statement - ViewPoint-Voyager 6.0.doc': No such file or directory Via smbclient it looks different, but still not accessible: Dicom 3.0 Conformance Statement _ ViewPoint-Voyager 6.0 2.doc 74240 Mon Sep 25 16:09:04 2000 Dicom 3.0 Conformance Statement _ ViewPoint-Voyager 6.0.doc 80896 Mon Sep 25 15:24:32 2000 34726 blocks of size 1048576. 4535 blocks available get "Dicom 3.0 Conformance Statement _ ViewPoint-Voyager 6.0.doc" NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND opening remote file ... (full path) The '-' are now underscores in smbclient. I tried using the unicode patches here: http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/ And when using smbfs with unicode ls shows: Dicom 3.0 Conformance Statement :2013 ViewPoint-Voyager 6.0 2.doc Dicom 3.0 Conformance Statement :2013 ViewPoint-Voyager 6.0.doc '-' to '_' to ':2013'. I have no idea what the problem is, and have tried diffferent codepages without luck. Any ideas? Viraj. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 2.0.6 and win 2000 pro
Hi, I´m running a red hat linux 6.2 as samba server and win 2000 pro. When i try to connect to samba server appears a error that says "start session from this Workstaison is not authorized for this acount" (no error number, sorry) I can connect from redhat 8.0 (using samba) so, i think the problem is in the Win 2000 side(how not!!) can anybody help me!! thank´s in advance Nacho -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] OS X slow with Samba server
I have an Apple iBook running OS X 10.2 connected to my network via an 802.11b wireless network. When I transfer files via SMB with my Windows 2000 computer, the speed seems reasonable. However, when I connect to a share on my Debian (x86) box (kernel 2.4.19) running Samba 2.2.3a-12 for Debian, the speed is only about a sixth as fast (transferring files to or from the Win2k box is about 6 times faster). I did some packet captures in the hope of figuring out something. First, here's a piece of a transfer from the Win2k box (voga.jeffienet) to the iBook (ibook.jeffienet). Sorry about the long lines. 870 10.080985 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 871 10.084876 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 872 10.086621 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 873 10.090163 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 874 10.093957 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 875 10.094042 ibook.jeffienet voga.jeffienetTCP 49209 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=1308141088 Ack=287400716 Win=65535 Len=0 876 10.098098 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 877 10.099777 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 878 10.101667 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 879 10.105350 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 880 10.109083 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 881 10.111019 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 882 10.28 ibook.jeffienet voga.jeffienetTCP 49209 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=1308141088 Ack=287409404 Win=65535 Len=0 883 10.115104 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 884 10.117015 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 885 10.120661 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 886 10.122415 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 887 10.126060 voga.jeffienetibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 888 10.126142 ibook.jeffienet voga.jeffienetTCP 49209 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=1308141088 Ack=287416644 Win=65535 Len=0 Look closely at the packet times. Voga sends a series of data packets, then ibook ACKs that group of packets. Notice that the ACK comes almost immediately after the last data packet. Now...take a look at a capture fragment for a file being sent from the Linux box (castrovalva.jeffienet) to the iBook: 152 3.216323castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 153 3.219965castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 154 3.223540castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 155 3.227242castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 156 3.230733castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 157 3.230805ibook.jeffienet castrovalva.jeffienet TCP 49208 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=3113175768 Ack=1353220046 Win=65535 Len=0 158 3.236769castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 159 3.238683castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 160 3.242363castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 161 3.246103castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 162 3.248020castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 163 3.404769ibook.jeffienet castrovalva.jeffienet TCP 49208 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=3113175768 Ack=1353227286 Win=59332 Len=0 164 3.410756castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 165 3.410908ibook.jeffienet castrovalva.jeffienet TCP 49208 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=3113175768 Ack=1353228734 Win=65535 Len=0 166 3.412829castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 167 3.416726castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 168 3.420294castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 169 3.422117castrovalva.jeffienet ibook.jeffienet NBSS NBSS Continuation Message 170 3.605023ibook.jeffienet castrovalva.jeffienet TCP 49208 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=3113175768 Ack=1353234526 Win=60284 Len=0 171 3.610969castrovalva.jeffienet
Re: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:43:40 John H Terpstra wrote: > >On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote: > >> In another thread John Terpstra rightly positions reiserfs > >> somewhere between ext2 and ext3, which means ahead of ext3. > > >And for waht it is worth, even though I found ReiserFS the poorest > >performing, I still use it on my file server. So, go figure, not > >everyone needs a Maserati! > > Have I misquoted you, John? In the thread about an ideal samba server > (Tyan, Athlons, IDE RAID - as if I wrote it) you said ext2 is by the > most efficient and ext3 the least, with reiserfs somewhere between. > Now it's the poorest performing. Have you got some new facts? Nah, I goofed. ext3 is the poorest, but ReiserFS is NOT the fastest and still I use it. I just installed a new machine as my local server. Now running SuSE 8.1 Pro with ReiserFS. MB is MSI with Athlon XP1700+, 512MB DDR RAM with WD 80GB IDE 7200rpm with 8MB Cache. I first installed Red Hat 8.0 with ext3 and it was able to write to disk faster than 100Mbit/sec ethernet could deliver the data. During copying of 34GB data over the wire, memory usage was constant at 335MB. I was using rsync (not samba) to copy my data. I then installed SuSE with ReiserFS. Disk write using rsync again was slower than 100Mbit/sec ethernet could deliver. Memory usage slowly grew until I was using 100% of my 1024MB Swap. In fact I found it was faster when I turned swap off! So maybe my erroneous comment that I just said I goofed on, was in this case not far from the truth after all. Anyhow, I am still using ReiserFS and I know it is not the fastest. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:43:40 John H Terpstra wrote: >On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote: >> In another thread John Terpstra rightly positions reiserfs >> somewhere between ext2 and ext3, which means ahead of ext3. >And for waht it is worth, even though I found ReiserFS the poorest >performing, I still use it on my file server. So, go figure, not >everyone needs a Maserati! Have I misquoted you, John? In the thread about an ideal samba server (Tyan, Athlons, IDE RAID - as if I wrote it) you said ext2 is by the most efficient and ext3 the least, with reiserfs somewhere between. Now it's the poorest performing. Have you got some new facts? _ Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year. http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus&ref=lmtplus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] domain local groups in winbindd
hi jerry, thanks for the quick reply. On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:50:06AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Guenther Deschner wrote: > > > is there any technical reason why winbind does not implement the > > represenatition of domain local groups in mixed-mode win2k-domains ? > > Already implemented in HEAD/SAMBA_3_0 yes, i know. but my question was: why are domain local groups only supported in native win2k-domains and not in mixed-mode domains? if i just comment out some native-mode checks in winbind i do see all the domain local groups properly as well in my mixed-mode domain. apparently this works. maybe there some technical reasons why the authors disabled domain local groups in mixed-mode win2k domains that i just don't see right now? thanks again, guenther -- Guenther Deschner [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux AGGnuPG: 8EE11688 Berliner Str. 27 phone: +49 (0) 30 / 430944778 D-13507 Berlin fax: +49 (0) 30 / 43732804 msg10793/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Samba] Troubles with Network Neighbourhood
There is a Recent-FAQs.txt document which discusses this error. Check your hosts allow and hosts deny parameters, and also think about erroneous reverse DNS lookups. You can increase the debugging level of smclient and get more information with smbclient -d4 -L servername Joel On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 04:09:19PM +0100, #ukasz Maria M cis3awski OP wrote: > > > Hi Joel, > > > Have you walked throught DIAGNOSIS.txt in the source docs? > > Yeah, but only after your mail :) and I've got such results: > > 1 & 2. pings and testparm > OK. > > 3. smbclient -L servername > warning about alternate permissions, but also: > added interface ... - it OK, > session request to servername failed (not listening or calling name) > session request to *SMBSERVER (same as above) > But I can't find what is wrong (smb.conf) is OK. > > 4. nmblookup -B servername __SAMBA__ -- returns IP of server as it should > 5,6,7,8,9,10 gives positive results (7th test "ex definitio" - as the machines > on subnet have access to all resources) > > So, the only trouble is with 3rd test... It suggests that there are troubles > with nmbd but I've completly no idea what to do with it (my knowledge about > administrating system is not very impressive :)). I'm not running smb from inetd > but as a daemon. And situation is strange for when machines arent logging and > have no access to server (just simple MSNetwork) they see each other very nice. > Aver starting server and allowing domain logon I have to seek machines by Find > Computer in Network Neighbourhood. > Lukasz > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] winbind help for newbie
Following up with more info... When I run: ./winbindd -i -d 1 winbindd version 2.2.7 started. Copyright The Samba Team 2000-2001 Added domain LMC (S-1-5-21-1530202311-1617714320-7473742) getting trusted domain list Added domain LMCMIG (S-1-5-21-1039822437-107361799-1990678075) So it looks like it's adding the LMC Domain (which is what I want) but then adds LMCMIG too (which if fine, but I don't really need) it almost seems to replace LMC with LMCMIG. When I then run wbinfo -m all I get is LMCMIG! I don't get it?!? Dan -Original Message- From: LaSusa, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:46 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Samba] winbind help for newbie I joined the domain (LMC) with the following command Smbpasswd -j LMC -r LMC_EXC1 (this is our PDC) -U administrator I then got prompted for the password, I entered it And got the message "Joined the LMC Domain" Then I stopped and restarted the smb service Did a wbinfo -u and then -g and still got info for the LMCMIG domain. I then went into the smb.conf file, changed Password server = * To Password server = LMC_EXC1 Restarted smb Still got the info for LMCMIG Went back into smb.conf Changed Password server = LMC_EXC1 To Password server = (IP address of server) Restarted smb Still no luck. Does SMB or Winbind have the info cached somewhere? Is there a way to flush that cache??? Thanks for your help! -Original Message- From: Errol Neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:26 PM To: LaSusa, Dan Subject: Re: [Samba] winbind help for newbie At 11:44 AM 12/13/2002 -0500, you wrote: >I've been looking thru manpages and online for help. > >I *think* I've got winbind mostly setup (somehow) but it seems to be >using the wrong Domain. > >Some info: >I am running RH7.3 >Kernel 2.4.18-3 >Samba 2.2.7 > >In my smb.conf file I have: >[global] > security = Domain > workgroup = LMC > > winbind separator = + > winbind uid = 1-2 > winbind gid = 1-2 > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum goups = yes > winbind cache time = 10 > >In my nsswitch.conf file I have: > >passwd:files winbind >shadow:files winbind >group: files winbind > >When I do a wbinfo -u or -g I get the info for our LMCMIG domain. > >Why is it using the LMCMIG domain instead of what I have in the >smb.conf file? How do I tell it to use LMC?? > >I am a newbie to all of this > >If I should be looking or asking elsewhereplease just let me >know... > >Thanks for any help! > >Dan > You might want to try the password server parameter. How did you join the domain? Did you specifiy the IP address of the password server? Errol -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] IPCo Mail Server Notification
The IPCo mail relay server has quarantined this message due to adult content. --- Begin Message --- --- End Message ---
[Samba] Samba versus NFS client??
We have been running Samba for several years, recently V2.0.7 on Solaris 7 but just upgraded to V2.2.7 on Solaris 8. The servers are linked to Cisco switches via gigabit adapter and all UNIX and Windows clients are on 100/Full. We have a mixture of AIX, Solaris, NT and 2000 clients We deal the typical Word/Excel/PowerPoint files but also have very large CAD files, 50MB to 2GB. We have never used Samba to serve these larger files because of performance reasons, instead we used Hummingbird Maestro NFS Client on NT/2000. The download speed to UNIX clients has never been a problem and typically works out to be about 5-8MB/sec I did some benchmarks this past week and using NFS the client took 38 seconds to upload a 288MB file to the server while Samba took 82 seconds! Download was, nfs - 50 seconds, Samba - 60 seconds, for the same file. My issue now is that I to get rid of Maestro. I have tried different settings of SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF, varying from 4096 to 32768, with no net change in speed. Is this just inherent in the smb protocol versus nfs, which is what I have been lead to believe from previous sysadmins? How can I make Samba as fast as NFS? [global] workgroup = EXCOENG netbios name = MARS netbios aliases = PHOBOS security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = trident, rodeo log level = 1 log file = /var/samba/logs/log.%m max log size = 500 name resolve order = host wins bcast deadtime = 15 lpq cache time = 30 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY lock dir = /var/samba/locks pid directory = /var/samba/locks write list = administrator printer admin = administrator print command = echo Printing %s at %p >> /tmp/print.log; /usr/ucb/lpr -P %p %s; rm %s [Eng_share] comment = Engineering data path = /data1/Eng_share read only = No create mask = 0664 force create mode = 0664 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0775 Graeme Walker System Administrator Exco Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Troubles with Network Neighbourhood
Have you walked throught DIAGNOSIS.txt in the source docs? Joel On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:10:31PM +0100, #ukasz Maria M cis3awski OP wrote: > Hi , > I've some torubles with smb server provided with Debian 3.0 Woody - I > can't see any machine in network neighbourhood, altought all machines > are loging and mapping resources shared by server correctly. What > exactly is needed to be installed with smb - any DNS or something like > this? Maybe the question is not too clever, but when I've had my server > on RH7.2 there was no such troubles - and I'm becoming a little > irritated - because of that I dont know, where is problem. Could you > help me? > Big thanx in advance > Lukasz > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Troubles with Network Neighbourhood
Hi , I've some torubles with smb server provided with Debian 3.0 Woody - I can't see any machine in network neighbourhood, altought all machines are loging and mapping resources shared by server correctly. What exactly is needed to be installed with smb - any DNS or something like this? Maybe the question is not too clever, but when I've had my server on RH7.2 there was no such troubles - and I'm becoming a little irritated - because of that I dont know, where is problem. Could you help me? Big thanx in advance Lukasz -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
