[Samba] list filtering

[Martin Pool]

Because of the enormous amount of traffic being generated by Windows
viruses[0] I have turned on Mailman attachment filtering on the
high-traffic samba.org lists.

Lists will now pass only text/plain MIME parts through to the list.
multipart/alternative messages with both text and html forms will have
the HTML form removed, and messages in only HTML will be squashed to
text.  Messages which cannot be handled in any of these ways will be
rejected.

To send patches or log files to the list, you need to either insert
them inline into your message, or make sure they're marked as
text/plain.  On most systems, just making the name be *.txt should be
sufficient.

I hope everybody's enjoying their SQL Server experience :-)



-- 
Martin 
samba.org postmaster

[0] ... automated notifications about viruses, users complaining about
viruses, users complaining about automated notification, users
complaining about users complaining, scanners complaining about
perfectly ordinary attachments, etc
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba 2.2.7a - Unix groups bug?

[Paul Taylor]

Further to comments made in another thread, Samba 2.2.7a appears to
limit the maximum number of Unix groups a user can have to 13
(NGROUPS_MAX - 3.)

The cause appears to be Samba adding to the groups list returned
by the getgroups() system call, such that a subsequent setgroups()
call has the number of groups set to (# of groups + 3).

For instance, my account has 12 groups; running truss against the smbd
thread for my account showed it calling "setgroups(15, 0x.);"
For another user who has 14 groups, the call is "setgroups(17, 0x);"
- this fails with "Err#22 EINVAL", since 17 is greater than NGROUPS_MAX
(= 16 under Solaris.)

The difference of 3 groups may be environment/implementation specific.

This behaviour didn't occur under Samba 2.2.0, so I suspect that
one of the fixes to group handling mentioned in the Changelogs is
responsible.

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance.

-- 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   Paul Taylor
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Remove the infected user

[Ray Simard]

On Monday 27 January 2003 16:30, Michael Heironimus wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:46:10PM -0800, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> > The better solution is to block attachments to the list.  That eliminates
> > almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
> > attachments.
>
> Except that then people couldn't attach copies of log files when they
> ask for help, or patch files if they have a bug fix. These things would
> have to be pasted as in-line text, which means they could not be
> compressed and would be subject to line-wrapping.

Perhaps restrict attachements to text/plain?

Ray

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] can't create user entries in smbpasswd

[Hans Graudenz]

Hi all,

after installing samba 2.2.5 (on Solaris8 running NIS+) it is not
possible to create user entries in smbpasswd.

I generated the smbpasswd file by
# cat /dev/null | /samba/samba-2.2.5/source/script/mksmbpasswd.sh >
/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd

-
without starting samba daemons I then tried to create user entry "dummy"
in smbpasswd by
(user "dummy" exists under NIS+)

# smbpasswd -a dummy
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
NIS+ lookup failure: Database for table does not exist
Failed to add entry for user dummy.
Failed to modify password entry for user dummy

-

the /etc/nsswitch.conf looks like following

#
# /etc/nsswitch.nisplus:
#
# An example file that could be copied over to /etc/nsswitch.conf; it
# uses NIS+ (NIS Version 3) in conjunction with files.
#
# "hosts:" and "services:" in this file are used only if the
# /etc/netconfig file has a "-" for nametoaddr_libs of "inet"
transports.

# the following two lines obviate the "+" entry in /etc/passwd and
/etc/group.
passwd: files nisplus
group:  files nisplus

# consult /etc "files" only if nisplus is down.
#hosts:  nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
ipnodes:files
# Uncomment the following line and comment out the above to resolve
# both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses from the ipnodes databases. Note that
# IPv4 addresses are searched in all of the ipnodes databases before
# searching the hosts databases. Before turning this option on, consult
# the Network Administration Guide for more details on using IPv6.
#ipnodes:nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
hosts:  files nisplus dns

#Uncomment the following line, and comment out the above, to use both
DNS
#and NIS+.  You must also set up the /etc/resolv.conf file for DNS name
#server lookup.  See resolv.conf(4).
#hosts: nisplus dns [NOTFOUND=return] files

services:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
networks:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
protocols:  nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
rpc:nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
ethers: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
netmasks:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
bootparams: files nisplus

publickey:  nisplus

netgroup:   nisplus

automount:  files nisplus
aliases:files nisplus
sendmailvars:   files nisplus

printers:   user nisplus files xfn

auth_attr:  files nisplus
prof_attr:  files nisplus
project:files

-

smb.conf looks like following

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = ABC
netbios name = SAMSER
server string = Samba 2.2.5 on SAMSER
interfaces = < samba server IP address >/255.255.255.0
security = USER
encrypt passwords = Yes
log level = 1
log file = /var/opt/samba/log.%m
load printers = No
wins server = < Wins sever IP address >
create mask = 0774
directory mask = 0775

[home]
comment = %u home dir
path = /export/home/%u
read only = No
create mask = 0750
directory mask = 0750
hosts allow = localhost, < subnet IP address>/255.255.255.0

[users]
comment = users
path = /export/home
read only = No
create mask = 0754
directory mask = 0755
hosts allow = localhost, < subnet IP address >/255.255.255.0

-

"configure" I did like following

/archive/samba/samba-2.2.5/source # ./configure
--prefix=/usr/local/samba --exec-prefix=/usr/local/samba
--with-acl-support --with-nisplussam --with-nisplus-home
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O  ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for a BSD compatible install... ./install-sh -c
checking for gawk... (cached) gawk
checking if the linker (ld) is GNU ld... (cached) no
checking for passwd... (cached) /usr/bin/passwd
checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... (cached)
yes
checking that the C compiler understands volatile... (cached) yes
checking host system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.8
checking target system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.8
checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.8
checking config.cache system type... same
enabling large file support
checking for inline... (cached) inline
checking how to run the C preprocessor... (cached) gcc -E
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... (cached) yes
checking for opendir in -ldir... (cached) no
checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... (cached)
yes
checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... (cached) yes
checking for arpa/inet.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/fcntl.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/select.h... (cached) yes
checking for fcntl.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/time.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for ut

RE: [Samba] win98 & samba file server

[payam]

thanks alot for your help
but the problem still exists.
when I add the line:
 wins server = 81.31.169.51
in my smb.conf the 'nmb' does not restart
somebody told me that this line makes your server a samba client and
'nmb' does not permit being samba server and client...
anywhere... as I said my samba works for XP but not for "win98"

It has really made me cofused!
It's a week that I'm working on it morning to night
why doesn't it work for 'win98' while it answers to XP??
I'm sorry, I don't want to bother you but if you think that you can give
me useful notes "PLEASE HELP", please lead me.

I forgot to say:
 - all of my computers have valid IP's
 - my LINUX server has a domain name (werc.sharif.edu)
thats all
sorry

thanks
payam


[global]
#wins server = 81.31.169.51
workgroup = 81.31.169.51
netbios name = 81.31.169.51
server string = 81.31.169.51 Samba server
#interfaces = lo 127.0.0.1 eth0 81.31.169.0/255.255.255.0
encrypt passwords = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
null passwords = Yes
log level = 1
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
security = domain
nt acl support = Yes
time server = Yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
#printcap name = /etc/printcap
#domain groups = ce
domain logons = Yes
os level = 165
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
#inaa ro man yes kardam
wins proxy = Yes
wins support = Yes

comment = 81.31.169.51 Samba Server
create mask = 0744
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 1 -s /bin/false -M %u
remote announce = 81.31.169.255/werc.sharif.edu
#logon drive = z:
logon home ="m" 
logon path = "m"
#logon home = \\%L\home\%G\%U
#logon path = \\%L\home\%G\%U\profile
logon script = "smblogin.bat %G %U"
#logon script = "users\%u.bat %G %U"
homedir map = amd.map
hosts allow =  81.31.169.47 81.31.169.42 81.31.169.0/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1 
unix password sync = yes
##
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u 
passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *tokens*
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
##
deadtime = 15
getwd cache = yes
lpq cache time =45
bind interfaces only = true
create mask = 0644
#oplocks = true
#level2 oplocks = true
read raw = yes
##
domain admin group = root administrator payam admin


#lock directory = /etc/samba/lock


[netlogon]
path = /home/netlogon
comment = not for you 
browseable = No
writeable = no
guest ok = no


[cdrom]
comment = The shared cdrom
path = /mnt/cdrom
admin users = root
guest ok = Yes
#[printers]
#   path = /var/spool/samba
#   browseable = no
#   printable = yes
[home]
guest ok = no
path = /home
comment = Your home directory
read only = no
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
#oplocks = false
#locking = no

#[Khorjin]
#   comment = File Archive!
#   path = /mnt/cabinet/hdb1/khorjin
#   read only = yes

# security_level.txt for details.
#   guest ok = Yes
127.0.0.1 localhost
81.31.169.47 werc421
81.31.169.42 werc422
81.31.169.51 wercs

81.31.169.5181.31.169.51#1b
81.31.169.5181.31.169.51#1d
81.31.169.5181.31.169.51#20
81.31.169.5181.31.169.51#1c

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] [nsswitch/pam_winbind.po] Error 1 With Compiling 3.0

[Micah Powell]

Greetings,
***Warning: New to compiling and use RPMs whenever I can :-)***
 
When trying to compile I get the above error.  It is preceded by:
 
===
.
.
.
Compiling nsswitch/pam_winbind.c with -fPIC
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:60: parse error before `*'
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: In function `converse':
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:67: `pamh' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:67: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
once
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:67: for each function it appears in.)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:67: `PAM_CONV' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:68: `PAM_SUCCESS' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:69: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:69: `nargs' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:69: `message' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:70: `response' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:70: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: At top level:
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:77: parse error before `*'
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: In function `_make_remark':
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:79: `PAM_SUCCESS' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:81: storage size of `msg' isn't known
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:85: `text' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:86: `type' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:89: `pamh' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:92: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:92: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:92: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:92: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:92: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:92: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: In function `pam_winbind_request':
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:108: `PAM_SERVICE_ERR' undeclared (first use in
this function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:123: `PAM_SUCCESS' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: In function `pam_winbind_request_log':
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:148: `PAM_AUTH_ERR' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:152: `PAM_ACCT_EXPIRED' undeclared (first use in
this function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:156: `PAM_AUTHTOK_EXPIRED' undeclared (first use
in this function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:160: `PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD' undeclared (first use
in this function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:164: `PAM_USER_UNKNOWN' undeclared (first use in
this function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:170: `PAM_IGNORE' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:173: `PAM_SUCCESS' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:150: warning: unreachable code at beginning of
switch statement
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: At top level:
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:267: parse error before `*'
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: In function `_winbind_read_password':
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:283: `pass' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:289: `ctrl' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:289: `PAM_OLDAUTHTOK' undeclared (first use in
this function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:289: `PAM_AUTHTOK' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:296: `pamh' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:297: `PAM_SUCCESS' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:308: `PAM_AUTHTOK_RECOVER_ERR' undeclared (first
use in this function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:320: storage size of `msg' isn't known
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:326: `comment' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:328: `PAM_TEXT_INFO' undeclared (first use in
this function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:336: `PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF' undeclared (first use
in this function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:337: `prompt1' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:340: `prompt2' undeclared (first use in this
function)
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:356:

[Samba] help

[Chris Mossner]

Hi, another swat problem
get always conncetion refused message
my httpd demon is working fine over the win 2000 network
when i do the status thing and netparm everything is fine
even created the swat file and checked for the tcp 901 thing in the servie
file
any clue



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] netlogon sometimes works (corrected with smb.confattached)

[jason . walton]

John,
thanks for your help thus far.
I switched switches that the PDC is plugged into and it almost had me 
believing that it worked, I managed to log in three times in quick 
succession and each time it executed the netlogon script.
Alas, inconsistency reared its ugly head once more and now I either get a 
successful logon (netlogon script runs) or a plain logon (validates my 
password, creates my profile share (z drive), but fails to run the 
netlogon share).
Which brings me to ask the question, is the netlogon share affected by 
network acvtivity? The PDC server is running fileservices, domino, and 
other items. Password validation isn't a problem, but getting samba to 
process the netlogon, is a pain.
Everything that did run on the NT server has been migrated to the solaris 
machine and works better and faster than before. The PDC is the last item 
left, I'm wondering if Samba needs a more dedicated host to invoke 
netlogon? Domino can be quite intensive on network activity when 
replicating between sites, so would this network deluge put samba off from 
the 'less critical' execution of the netlogon share?

FYI our NT server is an old Pentium, 64Mb RAM, 10M network card.
our solaris PDC server is a dual PIII, 1Gb RAM, 100M network card.


Jason Walton
Nomad Software Ltd
186 Regent Street
London W1B 5TN
Tel. +44 (20) 7292 2459
Fax. +44 (20) 7292 2401
www.nomadsoft.com




John H Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
21/01/2003 03:46

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Samba] netlogon sometimes works (corrected with smb.conf 
attached)


Jason,

We have gone over a few things already. You are using WINS, that means
your MS Windows clients should not have any trouble finding your samba
server and the services that run on it.

The only time I have seen similar behaviour, given that everything is
correctly configured from a Samba and MS Windows networking perspective,
has been where there has been a jabbering network card or a defective HUB.

Have you tried replacing the NICs in a client and the server? Have you
tried a cross-over cable between the two to validate that you the network
login process correctly completes EVERY time. If with known working NICs
and a cross-over cable you can reproduce the failure to execute the
network logon process correctly, then it might be time to turn back to
blaming the Samba or MS Windows configuration.

- John T.

On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Could anybody please help? I have tried all sorts and nothing will fix 
the
> problem permamently.
> I have a samba PDC which on occasion happily logs a user on and 
processes
> the NETLOGON share. However, it doesn't always run this service.
> I have placed preexec commands in both the profiles and netlogon shares,
> only the profiles preexec is executed.
> Reboots don't make any difference, only determed logout / logins will
> eventually get the netlogon share executed.
> I have included the full smb.conf file, samba is now running 2.2.7a, 
each
> upgrade results in the same problem.
>
> We have two domains, one controlled by an old NT PDC (this is to be
> retired) and one by a new samba PDC (to be the main PDC for all 
machines,
> once they are migrated). I have noticed that trying to join the samba
> domain over a VPN is impossible, whereas joining the NT domain, works
> first time. I don't know if this last bit is relevant to the problem or
> not.
>
>
> # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the
> # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed
> # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too
> # many!) most of which are not shown in this example
> #
> # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash)
> # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a #
> # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you
> # may wish to enable
> #
> # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command
> "testparm"
> # to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors.
> #
> #=== Global Settings
> =
> [global]
>
> ##
> ## Basic Server Settings
> ##
> netbios name = PDC
> netbios aliases = FILESERVER
> #   netbios name = PDCM
>
> # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: REDHAT4
> workgroup = NOMAD
> #   workgroup = PDC1
>
> # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field
> server string = Nomad PDC (Samba %v)
> #JOWserver string = Samba Server 2.2.6
>
> # This option is important for security. It allows you to 
restrict
> # connections to machines which are on your local network. The
> # following example restricts access to two C class networks and
> # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see
> # the smb.conf man page
> hosts allow = 192.168.2. 192.1

[Samba] can't create user entries in smbpasswd

[Hans Graudenz]

Hi all,

after installing samba 2.2.5 (on Solaris8 running NIS+) it is not
possible to create user entries in smbpasswd.

I generated the smbpasswd file by
# cat /dev/null | /samba/samba-2.2.5/source/script/mksmbpasswd.sh >
/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd

-
then tried to create user entry "dummy" in smbpasswd by
(user "dummy" exists under NIS+)

# smbpasswd -a dummy
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
NIS+ lookup failure: Database for table does not exist
Failed to add entry for user dummy.
Failed to modify password entry for user dummy

-

the /etc/nsswitch.conf looks like following

#
# /etc/nsswitch.nisplus:
#
# An example file that could be copied over to /etc/nsswitch.conf; it
# uses NIS+ (NIS Version 3) in conjunction with files.
#
# "hosts:" and "services:" in this file are used only if the
# /etc/netconfig file has a "-" for nametoaddr_libs of "inet"
transports.

# the following two lines obviate the "+" entry in /etc/passwd and
/etc/group.
passwd: files nisplus
group:  files nisplus

# consult /etc "files" only if nisplus is down.
#hosts:  nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
ipnodes:files
# Uncomment the following line and comment out the above to resolve
# both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses from the ipnodes databases. Note that
# IPv4 addresses are searched in all of the ipnodes databases before
# searching the hosts databases. Before turning this option on, consult
# the Network Administration Guide for more details on using IPv6.
#ipnodes:nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
hosts:  files nisplus dns

#Uncomment the following line, and comment out the above, to use both
DNS
#and NIS+.  You must also set up the /etc/resolv.conf file for DNS name
#server lookup.  See resolv.conf(4).
#hosts: nisplus dns [NOTFOUND=return] files

services:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
networks:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
protocols:  nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
rpc:nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
ethers: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
netmasks:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
bootparams: files nisplus

publickey:  nisplus

netgroup:   nisplus

automount:  files nisplus
aliases:files nisplus
sendmailvars:   files nisplus

printers:   user nisplus files xfn

auth_attr:  files nisplus
prof_attr:  files nisplus
project:files

-

"configure" I did like following

/archive/samba/samba-2.2.5/source # ./configure
--prefix=/usr/local/samba --exec-prefix=/usr/local/samba
--with-acl-support --with-nisplussam --with-nisplus-home
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O  ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for a BSD compatible install... ./install-sh -c
checking for gawk... (cached) gawk
checking if the linker (ld) is GNU ld... (cached) no
checking for passwd... (cached) /usr/bin/passwd
checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... (cached)
yes
checking that the C compiler understands volatile... (cached) yes
checking host system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.8
checking target system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.8
checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.8
checking config.cache system type... same
enabling large file support
checking for inline... (cached) inline
checking how to run the C preprocessor... (cached) gcc -E
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... (cached) yes
checking for opendir in -ldir... (cached) no
checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... (cached)
yes
checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... (cached) yes
checking for arpa/inet.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/fcntl.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/select.h... (cached) yes
checking for fcntl.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/time.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for utime.h... (cached) yes
checking for grp.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/id.h... (cached) no
checking for limits.h... (cached) yes
checking for memory.h... (cached) yes
checking for net/if.h... (cached) yes
checking for compat.h... (cached) no
checking for rpc/rpc.h... (cached) yes
checking for rpcsvc/nis.h... (cached) yes
checking for rpcsvc/yp_prot.h... (cached) yes
checking for rpcsvc/ypclnt.h... (cached) yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for string.h... (cached) yes
checking for strings.h... (cached) yes
checking for syslog.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/file.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/param.h... (cached) yes
checking for ctype.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/wait.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/resource.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/ioctl.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/ipc.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/mode.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/mman.h... (cached) yes
checking f

[Samba] WinXP - duplicate name exists

[Ben Scarbeau]

Ok got the access problems solved, thanks to 
everyone who replied.  Now though a new problem has arisen and I have 
not been able to find a solution or even what the problem could be besides a 
duplicate host.  I am trying to get access to the shares from a WinXP Pro 
client.  Everytime I try to join the workgroup I get the message: 'You were 
not connected because a duplicate name exists on the network.  Go to System 
in Control Panel to change the computer name and try again.'  Now I've 
tried changing the computer name, no good.  I've tried from a win2k client 
with a completely different computer name of course, same result.  Anyone 
know what this could be beside there actually being a duplicate host name on the 
network, which I am one hundred percent sure there isn't.  Thanks in 
advance.
 
Ben
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] more info - NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote file

[Paul Taylor]

On Jan 27, 10:33, Ben Scarbeau wrote:
> Subject: [Samba] more info - NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote file
>
> Thanks to those who had suggestions on my last post, but none of those
> seems to have worked.  I have narrowed down the problem a bit though,
> seems users can't write to a share that is not their primary group.
> For example:  Bob's primary group is Bob and secondary group is Sally.
> Bob can write to the Bob group share but not the Sally group share.
> Anymore thoughts/suggestions.  Thanks again in advance.

After upgrading to Samba 2.2.7a, a couple of users complained about not
being able to access directories via group access - it worked fine in 2.2.0
Both of the affected users had 14 or more secondary groups - removing them
from some unnecessary groups got around the problem.

The number of groups _doesn't_ seem to be the whole problem, though - when
I tried to reproduce the problem with a test user and groups, it worked
fine.  The length of the group(s) name may be significant - I didn't
investigate this.  (I tried using smbclient with a higher debug level,
but it just spewing a bunch of meaningless numbers etc.)

-- 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   Paul Taylor
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 help

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Is there a place that has all the options that you can add to the
> smb.conf file in verion 3.  How to set up as a domain controller and how
> the acl's work.  The documentation for verion 2.x on the samba web site
> is excellent , but I was not able to find any for 3.x.  Any help is
> greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Documentation for Samba 3.0 is included in the SAMBA_3_0 cvs 
cvs branch.  It's not all done though.  In particular, there is no
list of parameters that have been added/changed/deleted when moving 
from 2.2. to 3.0.




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NdsLIR7qMdg1EfYRAm8xAJ977CFfN86LXVr6QCtK7PwQnqUftQCgxJGx
hVCvECn9XXu2e2emJC6jze4=
=uHTF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Remove the infected user

[Daniel Fenwick]

> > The better solution is to block attachments to the list.  That
eliminates
> > almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
> > attachments.
>
> why not just run a virus scanner on the mail server which runs this
list...

The problem with trusting a virus scanner is that the virus software is
always a step behind the viruses.  Viruses get passed around before the
definition files are created and distributed.

Dan

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Remove the infected user

[Daniel Fenwick]

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:46:10PM -0800, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> > The better solution is to block attachments to the list.  That
eliminates
> > almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
> > attachments.
>
> Except that then people couldn't attach copies of log files when they
> ask for help, or patch files if they have a bug fix. These things would
> have to be pasted as in-line text, which means they could not be
> compressed and would be subject to line-wrapping.

Pasted or linked for download.  Putting them up and sending a link is a
better solution than allowing attachments to the list.  Allowing attachments
in a world where most viruses are transmitted as attachments is
irresponsible at best.

Dan

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Remove the infected user

[Mathias Homann]

Am Dienstag, 28. Januar 2003 00:46 schrieb Daniel Fenwick:
> > > Would someone please do the list a favor and remove the infected user
>
> from
>
> > > the mailing list?
> >
> > We're working on it.
>
> The better solution is to block attachments to the list.  That eliminates
> almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
> attachments.

why not just run a virus scanner on the mail server which runs this list... 


bye,
[L]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Remove the infected user

[Michael Heironimus]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:46:10PM -0800, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> The better solution is to block attachments to the list.  That eliminates
> almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
> attachments.

Except that then people couldn't attach copies of log files when they
ask for help, or patch files if they have a bug fix. These things would
have to be pasted as in-line text, which means they could not be
compressed and would be subject to line-wrapping.

-- 
Michael Heironimus
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] FreeBSD & Machine accounts

[Adam Smith]

Due to FreeBSD not allowing '$' in usernames, and because I have to add
a machine account for each computer I add to my Samba domain, what can I
do to try and accomplish the following?

1.  Automate FreeBSD to allow me to add machines to a domain the same
way Windows lets you do it from the workstation.

2.  Add user accounts which incorporate '$' without having to create a
different account first, and then edit a $ suffix manually afterwards.

Can anyone give me any pointers as to whether these can/can't be done?

My FreeBSD installation is version 5.0.


--
Adam Smith
Information Technology Officer
SAGE Automation Ltd.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sageautomation.com


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Remove the infected user

[Daniel Fenwick]

> > Would someone please do the list a favor and remove the infected user
from
> > the mailing list?
>
> We're working on it.

The better solution is to block attachments to the list.  That eliminates
almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
attachments.

Dan

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Moving Existing W2K Local Profile to W2K Roaming profile

[A Cline]

Hello all:

I am running Samba 2.2.3a on RedHat 7.3.  I have a user with an extensive 
Local Profile.  I want to join his computer to the domain and make his 
current local profile a roaming one.  I have tried the following steps:

Attached the computer to the domain.

Logged into the computer as a Domain Administrator.

Gone to my computer -> user profiles.

Selected the users local profile and clicked on Copy To.

In the path to copy to I put \\crhpdc\profiles\username.

I then telnet to crhpdc and
chown -R username.useranem ./profiles/username

It succeeds in copying all of the files to the correct place.  When I try to 
login as the user, however, the registry portion of the profile refuses to 
load but all of the Files and Icons etc. are there.

I have read the extensive post found here 
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=104260390311570&w=2 but I'm still 
pretty lost.  I gather that there is something called the User SID and found 
the registry entry that tells where that person's profile is located but I 
don't really know what to do from here.  I was able to download getsid.exe 
and use it seemingly successful enough.

I also realize that there is a utility in the latest CVS that will help me 
edit the ntuser.dat file on the samba server.  I think this is the way I 
want to go but I'm not 100% sure.  Can someone shed some light on how I need 
to use the new Samba utility to make this current .dat file work like I need 
it to?

Smaller and not as important of a question:  I read that you should have 
username.domain directories for your profile directories.  I have 
username.000, username.001, and sometimes username~000.  Does anyone know 
off-had what this means?  Did I screw up somewhere?

Thanks,

A Cline






_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups wanted

[smbmail]

I found something on the internet.
In older versions each printer was a separate share and in smb.conf this is
in fact still the case.
Each printer has its own section [lp1], etc
If you just put 'valid users = ' in the printer's section, this should still
be working.
Users can still print to a printer they are not allowed to print to, but
nothing will happen. They don't even get a message.
Why they left the valid users option out of  SWAT I don't know.

Gerben


- Original Message -
From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "smbmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups
wanted


> I believe a printer is a share. I don't think this would work for the
> special [printers] section. The smb.conf would need a separate share
> definition for each printer.
> Joel
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:40:16PM +0100, smbmail wrote:
> > Yes but this goes for shares, not for printers
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "smbmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups
> > wanted
> >
> >
> > > This is valid users, not hosts allow.
> > > Joel
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:55PM +0100, smbmail wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As far as I know you can only deny specific IP-ranges with hosts
deny
> > (or
> > > > allow with hosts allow)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Thomas Eisenzopf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:18 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific
users/groups
> > > > wanted
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > man smb.conf
> > > > > /  valid users
> > > > >
> > > > > You may have to set up individual shares for each printer, not
sure.
> > > > >
> > > > > Joel
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Thomas Eisenzopf wrote:
> > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I installed a samba server (2.2.7) with a NT domain and printing
> > support
> > > > > > without problems, everything is working fine. Client OS is
Windows
> > 2000.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now I want to give specific permissions to the printers, for
example
> > > > group
> > > > > > "users1" has permission to print to "lp1", group "users2" to
"lp2".
> > > > Everyone
> > > > > > is allowed to print to "lp3", but not to "lp1" and "lp2".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I tried to figure out, how to manage this. As far as I know I
have
> > to
> > > > use
> > > > > > Windows 2000 ACLs from the Windows 2000 user interface, and no
samba
> > > > > > specific settings. But always everyone can print to every
printer. I
> > > > also
> > > > > > searched usenet with google, but didn´t succeed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any help is appreciated!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Thomas.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
the
> > > > > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups wanted

[Joel Hammer]

I believe a printer is a share. I don't think this would work for the
special [printers] section. The smb.conf would need a separate share
definition for each printer.
Joel

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:40:16PM +0100, smbmail wrote:
> Yes but this goes for shares, not for printers
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "smbmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups
> wanted
> 
> 
> > This is valid users, not hosts allow.
> > Joel
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:55PM +0100, smbmail wrote:
> > >
> > > As far as I know you can only deny specific IP-ranges with hosts deny
> (or
> > > allow with hosts allow)
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Thomas Eisenzopf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:18 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups
> > > wanted
> > >
> > >
> > > > man smb.conf
> > > > /  valid users
> > > >
> > > > You may have to set up individual shares for each printer, not sure.
> > > >
> > > > Joel
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Thomas Eisenzopf wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > I installed a samba server (2.2.7) with a NT domain and printing
> support
> > > > > without problems, everything is working fine. Client OS is Windows
> 2000.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now I want to give specific permissions to the printers, for example
> > > group
> > > > > "users1" has permission to print to "lp1", group "users2" to "lp2".
> > > Everyone
> > > > > is allowed to print to "lp3", but not to "lp1" and "lp2".
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried to figure out, how to manage this. As far as I know I have
> to
> > > use
> > > > > Windows 2000 ACLs from the Windows 2000 user interface, and no samba
> > > > > specific settings. But always everyone can print to every printer. I
> > > also
> > > > > searched usenet with google, but didn´t succeed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any help is appreciated!
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Thomas.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups wanted

[smbmail]

Yes but this goes for shares, not for printers

- Original Message -
From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "smbmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups
wanted


> This is valid users, not hosts allow.
> Joel
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:55PM +0100, smbmail wrote:
> >
> > As far as I know you can only deny specific IP-ranges with hosts deny
(or
> > allow with hosts allow)
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Thomas Eisenzopf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups
> > wanted
> >
> >
> > > man smb.conf
> > > /  valid users
> > >
> > > You may have to set up individual shares for each printer, not sure.
> > >
> > > Joel
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Thomas Eisenzopf wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > I installed a samba server (2.2.7) with a NT domain and printing
support
> > > > without problems, everything is working fine. Client OS is Windows
2000.
> > > >
> > > > Now I want to give specific permissions to the printers, for example
> > group
> > > > "users1" has permission to print to "lp1", group "users2" to "lp2".
> > Everyone
> > > > is allowed to print to "lp3", but not to "lp1" and "lp2".
> > > >
> > > > I tried to figure out, how to manage this. As far as I know I have
to
> > use
> > > > Windows 2000 ACLs from the Windows 2000 user interface, and no samba
> > > > specific settings. But always everyone can print to every printer. I
> > also
> > > > searched usenet with google, but didn´t succeed.
> > > >
> > > > Any help is appreciated!
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Thomas.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups wanted

[Joel Hammer]

This is valid users, not hosts allow.
Joel
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:55PM +0100, smbmail wrote:
> 
> As far as I know you can only deny specific IP-ranges with hosts deny (or
> allow with hosts allow)
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Thomas Eisenzopf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups
> wanted
> 
> 
> > man smb.conf
> > /  valid users
> >
> > You may have to set up individual shares for each printer, not sure.
> >
> > Joel
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Thomas Eisenzopf wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I installed a samba server (2.2.7) with a NT domain and printing support
> > > without problems, everything is working fine. Client OS is Windows 2000.
> > >
> > > Now I want to give specific permissions to the printers, for example
> group
> > > "users1" has permission to print to "lp1", group "users2" to "lp2".
> Everyone
> > > is allowed to print to "lp3", but not to "lp1" and "lp2".
> > >
> > > I tried to figure out, how to manage this. As far as I know I have to
> use
> > > Windows 2000 ACLs from the Windows 2000 user interface, and no samba
> > > specific settings. But always everyone can print to every printer. I
> also
> > > searched usenet with google, but didn´t succeed.
> > >
> > > Any help is appreciated!
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Thomas.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
> >
> 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)

[Joel Hammer]

Why not just ignore it?
Hitting the D key is easy. Takes about 10 secs per day.
You are using just text email, aren't you?
You aren't reading email as root, are you?
If you are really security conscious, you'll create a unique user with
virtually no privileges to read your email.
After that, why worry about attachments?
If you are using Outlook for your email, you have no one to blame but
yourself.

Joel
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:33:06PM -0500, Ken Schneider wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 14:30, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> > > If someone that maintains the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER could find out who is
> > > sending the messages with the virus they could unsubscribe that one
> > > person and notify them. That way the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER would NOT be
> > > passing on more virii.
> > 
> > It is most likely more than one person.  The best solution is to block all
> > attachments sent to the list, then nothing can get sent out.  Blocking
> > attachments is the most responsible course of action for the list manager to
> > take.
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> The best course of action is to close the list to only those that have
> subscribed to the list, which would eliminate this kind of traffic.
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups wanted

[smbmail]

As far as I know you can only deny specific IP-ranges with hosts deny (or
allow with hosts allow)


- Original Message -
From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thomas Eisenzopf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups
wanted


> man smb.conf
> /  valid users
>
> You may have to set up individual shares for each printer, not sure.
>
> Joel
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Thomas Eisenzopf wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I installed a samba server (2.2.7) with a NT domain and printing support
> > without problems, everything is working fine. Client OS is Windows 2000.
> >
> > Now I want to give specific permissions to the printers, for example
group
> > "users1" has permission to print to "lp1", group "users2" to "lp2".
Everyone
> > is allowed to print to "lp3", but not to "lp1" and "lp2".
> >
> > I tried to figure out, how to manage this. As far as I know I have to
use
> > Windows 2000 ACLs from the Windows 2000 user interface, and no samba
> > specific settings. But always everyone can print to every printer. I
also
> > searched usenet with google, but didn´t succeed.
> >
> > Any help is appreciated!
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Thomas.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)

[Joel Hammer]

Adios.
Joel
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:41:03PM -0500, Ken Schneider wrote:d0i
> I guess it's time to unsubscribe from this list since they don't know
> how to setup and use anti-virus software on the list server.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] How forcly disconnect unwanted user?

[Kyle Loree]

This is straight out of the smb.conf man page from your local mirror of
samba.org.
it might help you.

deadtime (G) 

The value of the parameter (a decimal integer) represents the number of
minutes of inactivity before a connection is considered dead, and it is
disconnected. The deadtime only takes effect if the number of open files
is zero. 

This is useful to stop a server's resources being exhausted by a large
number of inactive connections. 

Most clients have an auto-reconnect feature when a connection is broken so
in most cases this parameter should be transparent to users. 

Using this parameter with a timeout of a few minutes is recommended for
most systems. 

A deadtime of zero indicates that no auto-disconnection should be
performed. 

Default: deadtime = 0 
Example: deadtime = 15 


[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I haven't tried this, but you can use smbstatus to get the pid of the smbd
>supplying the services to those users, then kill -15 pid.
>Since the output includes when the connection was made, you could write a
>bash script or whatever and kill connections older than a certain date or
>belonging to certain users.
>
>Joel
>
> Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:41:09PM +0300, óÁÌÔÁÅ? äÅÍÅÎÔÉ  ðÅÔÒÏ?É?
>wrote:tOn Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:41:09PM +0300, óÁÌÔÁÅ? äÅÍÅÎÔÉ 
>ðÅÔÒÏ?É? wrote:
>> Hello Samba Team!
>> 
>> I have a Samba fileserver installed on my network. Sometime I have a
>problem. There are some irresponsible users, who holds their network
>connections for no purpose. I want to disconnect forcedly such users .
>But I do not know how do it. Help me, please!
>> 
>> Dementiy P. Saltaev,
>> "Svyaztransneft", Volgograd, Russia,
>> 01.27.2003; 13:41.



Kyle Loree
Rendek Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups wanted

[Joel Hammer]

man smb.conf
/  valid users

You may have to set up individual shares for each printer, not sure.

Joel
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Thomas Eisenzopf wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I installed a samba server (2.2.7) with a NT domain and printing support
> without problems, everything is working fine. Client OS is Windows 2000.
> 
> Now I want to give specific permissions to the printers, for example group
> "users1" has permission to print to "lp1", group "users2" to "lp2". Everyone
> is allowed to print to "lp3", but not to "lp1" and "lp2".
> 
> I tried to figure out, how to manage this. As far as I know I have to use
> Windows 2000 ACLs from the Windows 2000 user interface, and no samba
> specific settings. But always everyone can print to every printer. I also
> searched usenet with google, but didn´t succeed.
> 
> Any help is appreciated!
> 
> Best regards,
> Thomas.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] How forcly disconnect unwanted user?

[Joel Hammer]

I haven't tried this, but you can use smbstatus to get the pid of the smbd
supplying the services to those users, then kill -15 pid.
Since the output includes when the connection was made, you could write a
bash script or whatever and kill connections older than a certain date or
belonging to certain users.

Joel

 Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:41:09PM +0300, óÁÌÔÁÅ× äÅÍÅÎÔÉÊ ðÅÔÒÏ×ÉÞ wrote:tOn Mon, Jan 
27, 2003 at 01:41:09PM +0300, óÁÌÔÁÅ× äÅÍÅÎÔÉÊ ðÅÔÒÏ×ÉÞ wrote:
> Hello Samba Team!
> 
> I have a Samba fileserver installed on my network. Sometime I have a problem. There 
>are some irresponsible users, who holds their network connections for no purpose. I 
>want to disconnect forcedly such users . But I do not know how do it. Help me, please!
> 
> Dementiy P. Saltaev,
> "Svyaztransneft", Volgograd, Russia,
> 01.27.2003; 13:41.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] TDB to text

[Diego Rivera]

I seem to recall the existence of a utility to convert (dump?) TDB files
into text format so one could peruse the contents.  I also seem to
recall that one could do the reverse - build a TDB from a text file.

Is this true?  Does this utility exist?  Would I have to hack my own out
of the TDB code in Samba?

Best

Diego


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: RE: [Samba] NT PDC to Samba PDC migratio

[Kyle Loree]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>   I thought that it was quite impossible to do that due to the Domain SID 
> 
>as well as the SAM list that currently Samba is unable to retrieve. (Not 
> 
>that it would have helped me any, since our old NT 4.0 PDC took a major   
>Hardware failure.)
>
>   How would one duplicate the SID, is that possible with 'smbpasswd -S'   
>from the new Samba DC?

the Sys id is in the MACHINE.SID file that is usually in the same dir as
your smbpasswd file.


Kyle Loree
Rendek Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] NT PDC to Samba PDC migratio

[Ronan Waide]

On January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>   I thought that it was quite impossible to do that due to the Domain SID   
> as well as the SAM list that currently Samba is unable to retrieve. (Not   
> that it would have helped me any, since our old NT 4.0 PDC took a major   
> Hardware failure.)
> 
>   How would one duplicate the SID, is that possible with 'smbpasswd -S'   
> from the new Samba DC?

'net rpc vampire' from samba CVS seems to do the trick rather nicely.

Cheers,
Waider.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.

"I remind tha audience that the Official Advice from Sasquatch, Lord of the
 Crepe-Paper Sausages, is to not run VM in this environment."  - Kyle Jones
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] NT PDC to Samba PDC migratio

[Robert Adkins]

I thought that it was quite impossible to do that due to the Domain SID   
as well as the SAM list that currently Samba is unable to retrieve. (Not   
that it would have helped me any, since our old NT 4.0 PDC took a major   
Hardware failure.)

How would one duplicate the SID, is that possible with 'smbpasswd -S'   
from the new Samba DC?

Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
Ph. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804


 -Original Message-
From: Ronan Waide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Diego Rivera; Robert Adkins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] NT PDC to Samba PDC migration

   

On January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Has anyone succeeded in doing a transparent (or an
> as-close-to-as-possible) migration of an NT4 PDC to a Samba PDC?

Yes, search the archives for the procedure I posted on Nov 25 or
thereabouts.

The only "problem" as such is that if you need to keep the PDC around,
you have to disable the netlogon service on it to stop it trying to
become the PDC again. That or rebuild it from scratch as a regular
server (non-DC).

Cheers,
Waider.
 --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"It's ridiculous, you go and suddenly there's no email, or at least
 considerably less... I suppose we just have to face the fact that life   
does
 revolve around you..." - Clarkey
 --
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] NT PDC to Samba PDC migration

[Ronan Waide]

On January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Has anyone succeeded in doing a transparent (or an
> as-close-to-as-possible) migration of an NT4 PDC to a Samba PDC?

Yes, search the archives for the procedure I posted on Nov 25 or
thereabouts.

The only "problem" as such is that if you need to keep the PDC around,
you have to disable the netlogon service on it to stop it trying to
become the PDC again. That or rebuild it from scratch as a regular
server (non-DC).

Cheers,
Waider.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"It's ridiculous, you go and suddenly there's no email, or at least
 considerably less... I suppose we just have to face the fact that life does
 revolve around you..." - Clarkey
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] unable to join 2000 to samba domain

[Mike Rambo]

I have a situation where some 2000 machines are unable to join the samba
domain. We have about 50 machines of which two thirds are 2000 boxes.
All of the 9x boxes log to the samba domain with no trouble. Of the 2000
machines we have two groups - some IBM's and some Dell's with the Dell's
being a couple of months older. All of the IBM's joined the domain
without problems. None of the Dell's would. They both are 2000SP1. After
wiping and reinstalling 2000SP2 on the Dell's most of them now also join
the domain. However, I have a handful (4 or 5) machine that after wiping
still refuse to join the domain. Here is the error I get...

An error occurred attempting to join the domain "CLCCA".
The account used is a computer account. Use your global user account or
local user account to access this server.

I am logged onto the local machine as the local administrator and am
using the server root user account to join the domain. I believe I have
performed that same steps on all of these machines yet I have this
problem with some of them. Can anyone shed some light on what this error
means and what I can do to rectify it?

On a related subject, is there a way to create a second user account
that local building people can use to join machines to the domain
without giving out the server root password?

Thanks.


-- 
Mike Rambo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] samba pdc smbpasswd error

[Kyle Loree]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Kyle Loree wrote:
>
>> I have gotten samba to allow an xp client to logon to the domain server
>> before, my problem now is doing exactly that on a different machine.
>> I can browse files, but I get an access is denied error upon join.
>> 
>> [2003/01/27 10:46:21, 0]
>>
>/SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(670)
>>   api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
>
>The XP client tries an info level that we don't get right.  It then backs
>down to a different infor levelf for the set_userinfo call.  You can 
>mostly ignore this error.

I need to be able to bind to the domain and I have done it before with the
same xp machine.  You are closer than you think!
with sp1 I didn't have to install the signorseal patch either.  just
change the local security policies.
>
>
>> [2003/01/27 10:46:21, 2]
>>
>/SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:startsmbfilepwent(170)
>>   startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file
>/var/db/samba/smbpasswd.
>> Error was Permission denied
>
>Are you connected as root?

I am connected as admin, on mac 0s x server root cannot connect bad pass
or user
>
>> [2003/01/27 10:46:21, 0]
>>
>/SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwrid(1416)
>>   unable to open passdb database.

The server is running at root level,  and changes the chmod on smbpasswd
every connect attempt.
I either find a way to force samba to believe that admin is root or i need
to wipe the system and reinstall.  not a favorable option.

Kyle Loree
Rendek Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] NT PDC to Samba PDC migration

[Diego Rivera]

Hi all,

I read a few posts a while back from people who were trying to get this
done.

Has anyone succeeded in doing a transparent (or an
as-close-to-as-possible) migration of an NT4 PDC to a Samba PDC?

I know it entails stuff like snatching the passwords with pwdump or the
like, and importing them into smbpasswd/LDAP, and toying around with
RID's/SID's for the new PDC to make it look just like the old PDC.

I also remember there were issues with existing roaming profiles.

Can anyone offer refreshers?

Best

Diego



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Winbind: login "cannot find name for group ID XXXXX" ONLY RedHat 8

[Chris de Vidal]

My RedHat 8.0 workstation doesn't want to play nice
with Winbind.  The rest of our Samba servers (on
RedHat 7.3) are working fine, and I am familiar with
setting up Winbind.

Samba: 2.2.7a (RPM from Samba.org.  RedHat's RPMs do
same thing.)
Kernel 2.4.20
NT 4 domain

I'd copied the pam and smb.conf from a working box in
testing.  Getent passwd and group works, BUT getent
group 'Domain Users' does not (perhaps this is
related??).  However, getent group | grep 'Domain
Users' works.  getent group  works.

[supcd@us05201637 supcd]$ testparm | grep winbind
'winbind separator = +' might cause problems with
group membership.

winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
winbind separator = +
winbind cache time = 15
winbind enum users = Yes
# No did the same thing)
winbind enum groups = Yes
# No did the same thing)
winbind use default domain = Yes
[root@us05201637 root]# su - supcd
id: cannot find name for group ID 10003
[supcd@us05201637 supcd]$ groups supcd
id: cannot find name for group ID 10003
id: cannot find name for group ID 10001
id: cannot find name for group ID 10006
id: cannot find name for group ID 10019
id: cannot find name for group ID 10018
[supcd@us05201637 supcd]$ getent group 'Domain Users'
[supcd@us05201637 supcd]$ getent group 10003
[supcd@us05201637 supcd]$ getent group | grep 10003
Domain Users:x:10003:Administrator,supml,supcd...(87
usernames snipped)
[supcd@us05201637 supcd]$ getent group 'Domain Admins'
Domain Admins:x:10001:Administrator,supcd... (10
usernames snipped)
[supcd@us05201637 supcd]$ getent group 10001
Domain Admins:x:10001:Administrator,supcd... (10
usernames snipped)

(Logging into RedHat 7.3 box in same domain; no error
on login)
[supcd@hjx-graphics-01 supcd]$ groups supcd
supcd : Domain Users Domain Admins

Ideas?  I can provide more info (e.g. pam files) on
request.
/dev/idal

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 help

[Kyle Loree]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Is there a place that has all the options that you can add to the smb.conf
>file in verion 3.  How to set up as a domain controller and how the acl's
>work.  The documentation for verion 2.x on the samba web site is excellent
>, but I was not able to find any for 3.x.  Any help is greatly
>appreciated.
>Thanks in advance.

I think the fastest way to list the bulk of them is to run "testparm |
more"
it will test your config then list other options

Always make sure you know what you are doing when you change an option.


Kyle Loree
Rendek Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] samba pdc smbpasswd error

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Kyle Loree wrote:

> I have gotten samba to allow an xp client to logon to the domain server
> before, my problem now is doing exactly that on a different machine.
> I can browse files, but I get an access is denied error upon join.
> 
> [2003/01/27 10:46:21, 0]
> /SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(670)
>   api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.

The XP client tries an info level that we don't get right.  It then backs
down to a different infor levelf for the set_userinfo call.  You can 
mostly ignore this error.

> [2003/01/27 10:46:21, 2]
> /SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:startsmbfilepwent(170)
>   startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /var/db/samba/smbpasswd.
> Error was Permission denied

Are you connected as root?

> [2003/01/27 10:46:21, 0]
> /SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwrid(1416)
>   unable to open passdb database.




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NZ11IR7qMdg1EfYRAh4iAKCioQvm19NF+SkYY1u8/WSXnUD2NACgvhzs
tJealzWRBCwGwvmVGUHtn9Q=
=FFpJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: RE : [Samba] Winbind on HPUX11, Totally Stuck, Please Help

[Miles Roper]

Title: RE : [Samba] Winbind on HPUX11, Totally Stuck, Please Help



Hi 
Drew,
 
No 
luck.
 
Pretty 
much done all that, still get all the same problems.
 
That 
site was pretty good though :o)
 
Does 
anyone have an idea about the shell logging in?  Why do I keep on getting 
logged out?  Does the home directory need to be created, does it need a 
.profile?  What about the permissions?  I've tried creating one 
world writeable but no luck.
 
Cheers
 
Miles

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:35 
  a.m.To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE : [Samba] Winbind on 
  HPUX11, Totally Stuck, Please Help
  Miles, Jennifer 
  I am not currently using Winbind, but I did try 
  testing with it on HPUX 1100 about a year ago.  To get it to work I 
  followed the instructions I found at the following web site :
  www.miratek.com/samba 
  It might have some answers to your problems. 
  
  Hope this helps. 
  Cheers. 

[Samba] Samba 3.0 help

[David . Grudek]

Is there a place that has all the options that you can add to the smb.conf
file in verion 3.  How to set up as a domain controller and how the acl's
work.  The documentation for verion 2.x on the samba web site is excellent
, but I was not able to find any for 3.x.  Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Removing Print Driver?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 23 Jan 2003, Jeff Marcille wrote:

> 
> Is it possible to remove a printer driver with Samba? I can update one
> and install them through the add/remove wizard but can not remove one.

Goto the drivers tab of the Server properties window (printers folder on 
server; File -> Server Properties).  Only shows up on Win2k/XP clients.




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NZv3IR7qMdg1EfYRAj0EAKDZFIktTBRcDPWMClQnyzJkTs9hZACeOoIa
LEiaRf8W9Ul6iStEY4zeJtc=
=nEud
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] running a script when a user logs on (NOT netlogon!)

[Leonardo Fogel]

> i want the server (which is running samba and is
> configured as PDC) to execute a simple shell
> script when a specific (or any?) user logs on
> with his nt machine. is this possible?
> 
> to clear the things, i do NOT mean a batch file
> that is executed on the client, it has to be
> executed on the server!
> 
> thanks, woerns

Have you tried 'preexec' or 'root preexec' commands?
Look at the manual page for smb.conf for details.
Regards.

___
Busca Yahoo!
O serviço de busca mais completo da Internet. O que você pensar o Yahoo! encontra.
http://br.busca.yahoo.com/
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Q'n for HOWTO - setting ldap ssl = off

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Jim wrote:

> Just to be sure, will setting 'ldap ssl = off' affect anything other 
> than the communications between the samba and ldap servers?

No.



cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NZlXIR7qMdg1EfYRAiEYAJ4p/26CHEHQCYMbCIttGWzVls4Y0QCeLTH0
yC3Wym3xVyvwzoLdDA0P8d4=
=0Ymd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Remove the infected user

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, John P Santos wrote:

> Would someone please do the list a favor and remove the infected user from
> the mailing list?

We're working on it.

> 
> At 14:11 27/1/2003, you wrote:
> >Symantec Email Proxy deleted the following email message:
> >
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: samba digest, Vol 1 #2117 - 14 msgs
> >




cheers, jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NZkUIR7qMdg1EfYRAlpYAKCEynNUBCb3rOGlYF50BnwhMvW6cQCeOnq2
w83fnpiCxMki9z3eppbKFgo=
=VJcS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] security = 'domain' and 'server'

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, akshaysalkar wrote:

> i would like to know 
> whats the difference between
> security = server

i.e. Win9x pass through authentication

> security = domain

i.e. Windows NT 4.0 domain member server (uses RPC for authentication).




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NZd9IR7qMdg1EfYRAtPnAKC5iMiNS1OC9nx5ZFOB34M3v3Q2pACg5OLW
1wN1y6ASjeTnvDLFgdPuPNc=
=tJab
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] re: website samba.org is missing most of the documentation?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Except for some reason, in his/her infinite wisdom, your webmaster has
> apparently decided not to put most of your documentation on your website
> - where is it? Why is it not online? I cannot belive I am the first
> person in the world trying to read documenation online?

We don't have a webmaster.  The web site is stored in cvs (so you could 
submit pacthes if you wished).  

> E.g. Go to http://samba.mirror.ac.uk/samba/docs/ and all you will find
> are links to man-pages for the samba tools. What on earth has happened
> to (picking a chunk out of the list that the samba-doc-2.2.7arpm claims
> to install):

Most of the textdocs are being deprecated in favour of the SGML versions 
which are linked under the "Other Documention" column beside the man page 
links.  Look for the Samba-HOWTO-Collection.




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NZcSIR7qMdg1EfYRAnSMAJ9q0ybdklLNW5R1qGwWinVefDqRUACeOOVf
f1hMnCUHGT4DrNkyqW0xw04=
=khsc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Virus waarschuwing / warning

[Bronswerk Heat Transfer BV]

Dear Mr/Mrs,

You have send our company an e-mail with the subject:
"samba digest, Vol 1 #2117 - 14 msgs"
wich contains a virus according to our virusscanner.

It is also possible that a virus misuses your e-mail
address, in that case sorry for the accusation. In that case
please see this mail as a warning, the virus knows your mail
adres and it is very likely that you recieve a virus soon.


You have send it to:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



You have send the following attachments and virusses to us:

  Attachment: Neu
  Virus : W32/Yaha.g@MM

Please install a good virusscanner on your computer
and keep it up-to-date.

This is an automaticly computer generated e-mail.
Reply to this mail is useless.




Geachte heer/mevrouw,

U heeft aan ons bedrijf een e-mail gestuurd met als onderwerp:
"samba digest, Vol 1 #2117 - 14 msgs"
waarin volgens onze virusscanner een virus verborgen zit.

Het is ook mogelijk dat een virus uw e-mail adres misbruikt,
in dat geval sorry voor de onterechte beschuldiging.
Laat deze mail dan een waarschuwing voor u zijn omdat het
virus dus uw e-mail adres kent en de kans groot is dat u ook
een virus toegestuurd krijgt.


De geadresseerde was:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



De volgende bijlage(s) en virus(sen) heeft u gestuurd:

  Bijlage: Neu
  Virus  : W32/Yaha.g@MM

Installeer a.u.b. een goede virusscanner op uw PC
en houd deze up-to-date.

Dit is een automatische door de computer gegenereerde
e-mail. Een antwoord hierop heeft geen zin.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)

[hans]

It's not the list, it's the recipient's who have autoresponders set up.  
- Original Message - 
From: "Ken Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)


> I guess it's time to unsubscribe from this list since they don't know
> how to setup and use anti-virus software on the list server.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 14:29, archiv24 wrote:
> *** WARNING **
> This message has been scanned by MDaemon AntiVirus and was found to 
> contain infected attachment(s). Please review the list below.
> 
> Attachment Virus name Action taken
> --
> Neu Textdokument (2).jpg .batI-Worm.Lentin.g Removed 
> 
> **
> Zeit 23:48:06 26.01.2003 Typ Bericht Betreff Eine Flotte nach 1:113:9
> erreichte ihr Ziel Nachricht Angreifer (1:110:1) Flugzeuge Gesamt
> Verluste Raven 20 12 Verteidiger (1:113:9) Flugzeuge Gesamt Verluste
> Keine Flugzeuge vorhanden Defensivanlagen Gesamt V
> .
> .
> More details attached
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

___
All emails incoming and outgoing from SBS Forestry Inc.
are scanned by Kaspersky Antivirus.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Win2k DC no longer authenticates for Samba shares

[Gaffey, Mike]

I have a win2k domain ... 2 of the client machines are Red Hat (7.3 and
8.0).  I set everything up to use the DC to authenticate ID/PW.  Everything
worked perfectly until a week or so ago ... Samba would automatically create
a home folder and the whole nine yards.  Now I can see the shares on the
Samba machines, but I can't access them ... just prompts for the ID/PW over
and over.  I can mount windows shares from the Linux boxes with no problems.
I get "access denied" in the DC event logs when I try to access the Samba
shares.  If I run "wbinfo" on the linux boxes, it shows me the domain users.
The only thing I can remember doing to the windows machines is running
windowsupdate and applying all the "critical" patches ... same thing w/ the
linux boxes ... just the auto updates from Red Hat.

Any ideas?
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] FW: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-070: Flaw in SMBSigning Could Enable Group Policy to be Modified (309376)

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Barry, Christopher wrote:

> All,
>   Could this patch in any way cause problems with samba?

Anything is possible.  However, we don't do smb signing in 2.2 so 
theorietically, this would not affect Samba (unless it did something like 
make signing mandatory).



cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NYj3IR7qMdg1EfYRAmY0AJ4iLViz7YYazowV4WqSQuR6CLzwpQCgvMdC
a0hxs/YA/mbP2ixbf91vD2c=
=VM9c
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Connection refused - port 445

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dezider Gora wrote:

> Connecting to host=PRINTSERVER share=IPC$
> Connecting to 10.223.11.1 at port 445
> error connecting to 10.223.11.1:445 (Connection refused)

Samba 2.2 does not service port 445 by default (Samba 3.0 will).
Just ignore the error.  rpcclient falls back and reconnects on port 
139.




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NZKdIR7qMdg1EfYRApOuAKDSWH886dtsVjU1spkV9vrSHZ6W9gCg0ow1
LpyD+oYx8uM18rJgyobq0FY=
=o/B/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] OT: Virus Traffic jams

[Markus Schabel]

Rashkae wrote:

I have to wonder which, at this point causes more congestion and stress to
e-mail systems.  E-mail viruses, or aggresive Anti-Virus programs that
are configured to allert everyone.  Is this a configurable option in AV
software... Should people start pressuring AV companies to change this
behaviour?


AV-response-mails usually go to the sender (from:), not to the
recipients (to:). I think nobody is interested in getting "you would
have received a virus without antivir protection" except
AV-vendor-PR-departments.

regards
Markus Schabel
++
| TGM - Die Schule der Technik,   IT-Service |
|A-1200 Wien, Wexstrasse 19-23   |
| Tel.: +43(1)33126/316 Fax: +43(1)33126/154 |
| eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
| FSF Associate Member #597  |
| Linux User #259595 (http://counter.li.org) |
++

Computers are like airconditioners:
  They stop working properly if you open windows.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] FW: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-070: Flaw in SMBSigning Could Enable Group Policy to be Modified (309376)

[Barry, Christopher]

Thanks Jerry. My fear was the latter...

--
Christopher Barry
Manager of Information Systems
InfiniCon Systems
http://www.infiniconsys.com
office: 610.233.4747
direct: 610.233.4870
cell:   267.879.8321


-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Barry, Christopher
Cc: Samba (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Samba] FW: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-070: Flaw in
SMBSigning Could Enable Group Policy to be Modified (309376)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Barry, Christopher wrote:

> All,
>   Could this patch in any way cause problems with samba?

Anything is possible.  However, we don't do smb signing in 2.2 so 
theorietically, this would not affect Samba (unless it did something like 
make signing mandatory).



cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NYj3IR7qMdg1EfYRAmY0AJ4iLViz7YYazowV4WqSQuR6CLzwpQCgvMdC
a0hxs/YA/mbP2ixbf91vD2c=
=VM9c
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] samba pdc smbpasswd error

[Kyle Loree]

I have gotten samba to allow an xp client to logon to the domain server
before, my problem now is doing exactly that on a different machine.
I can browse files, but I get an access is denied error upon join.

[2003/01/27 10:46:21, 0]
/SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(670)
  api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
[2003/01/27 10:46:21, 2]
/SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:startsmbfilepwent(170)
  startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /var/db/samba/smbpasswd.
Error was Permission denied
[2003/01/27 10:46:21, 0]
/SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwrid(1416)
  unable to open passdb database.


That is my error from log file.
I have seen this problem mentioned elsewhere, though i have never seen a
solution, does anyone have any insight?

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Virus Protection ... Which one...?

[Markus Schabel]

Stephen Kuhn wrote:

On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 00:36, Ryan Beisner wrote:


Hi all

I've found a few different packages (RAV, Kaspersky,Vexira, Clam ...)
which offer Anti-Virus features for Linux servers.  It looks like RAV
specifically supports Samba servers.


My question is:

Can anyone relay their experiences / opinions / thoughts about which one
would work best in a multiple-server environment (~100 Windows Clients)?


Thanks in advance -- all comments are welcome.

-Ryan Beisner




In the sense of "keeping it simple" - I got the free version of f-prot
and use it in a script called out every hour to scan my Samba shares
(even works on mounted shares to Windows machines) - once I got it
setup, it was great - fast and easy and helps to keep everything clean
here...I went for "free" because of budgeting...and well, can't complain
- especially after this past weekend! We're up and running!



You can run Antivir (www.hbedv.de) without problems on your linux-box, 
there's a public noncommercial licence available, and for commercial
usage the prices are ok.

running also as mailgate on our mailserver ;)

regards
Markus Schabel
++
| TGM - Die Schule der Technik,   IT-Service |
|A-1200 Wien, Wexstrasse 19-23   |
| Tel.: +43(1)33126/316 Fax: +43(1)33126/154 |
| eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
| FSF Associate Member #597  |
| Linux User #259595 (http://counter.li.org) |
++

Computers are like airconditioners:
  They stop working properly if you open windows.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba as PDC for WinXP, Win98 and Win95

[joao marka]

well.. let´s see this step by step...

have you aplied the registry changes (signorseal) ?
created Machine accounts on the server ?

(I will not give up until your XP join the domain!)


At 16:44 27/01/03, Jerome Warnier wrote:

joao marka wrote:

well, just to let ya know my case, the first macine w/ xp pro i´ve 
installed here, i´ve tried everything (including the signorseal patch) 
and it didn´t worked out... just after the service pack...
the second machine, i´ve just installed the service pack 1 and... voila! 
it joined the domain without need to run the signorseal patch..
I can now confirm the XP stations on which I failed have XP Pro and SP1 
applied.
Anyone has another (better) idea?

i don´t know if someone had the same experience w/ XP ( just one litle 
detail... brazilian portuguese version...)
but, anyway, try the patch!

At 15:48 27/01/03, Michael Paarmann wrote:

Hi!

If done the same job, but i've replaced a novell server with a samba pdc 
based on SuSE Linux. I had different problems with Win XP Pro, but none 
with the other WinOS.
Have you installed the "SignOrSeal"-Patch? Without this, you can't logon 
with a win xp machine on a samba domain.
Use Google to find this patch.

Regards,
Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Beginner feeling a little better now

[Brian]

Mark Butcher wrote:

"What I can not yet do is transfer data from the Linux box to a Windows PC
from the Linux machine - I don't know how to view the network "

Previous posts suggest you are using SuSE. If so, one way to look at the network in a friendly environment is to go to Yast2's "Install/Remove Software" and search for "LinNeighborhood". Install it. It should be in Internet Tools now. Run it and click Add for each Windows computer you want to add to the network. By typing in the name of the computer and clicking Query it should fill in the rest of the info like IP address, so you don't have to know it.

Click on one of the windows computers that shows up and you should get a list of available drives. Click on a drive and then click MOUNT. You will likely have to mount it as root, so check off that box and enter your root password. It defaults to mounting the drive in /home/[linuxusername]/mnt/[windowscomputername]/[windowsdrivename]. Now if you were in Konqueror or whatever and wanted to save a file to that windows computer, it should work no problem.

If any of this doesn't work it might be because I have NFS up and running, so if the above doesn't work (I think it will) then investigate installing an NFS server and NFS client on your linux box. (Although I think that should only affect communication between linux boxes not linux/windows, but I don't know much more than you!)

Brian


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] OT: Virus Traffic jams

[Rashkae]

I have to wonder which, at this point causes more congestion and stress to
e-mail systems.  E-mail viruses, or aggresive Anti-Virus programs that
are configured to allert everyone.  Is this a configurable option in AV
software... Should people start pressuring AV companies to change this
behaviour?





-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)

[Ken Schneider]

On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 14:30, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> > If someone that maintains the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER could find out who is
> > sending the messages with the virus they could unsubscribe that one
> > person and notify them. That way the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER would NOT be
> > passing on more virii.
> 
> It is most likely more than one person.  The best solution is to block all
> attachments sent to the list, then nothing can get sent out.  Blocking
> attachments is the most responsible course of action for the list manager to
> take.
> 
> Dan
> 
The best course of action is to close the list to only those that have
subscribed to the list, which would eliminate this kind of traffic.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] password server is not connected

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, David Bear wrote:

> I have installed samba 2.2.7a on FreeBSD from the ports collection.  I
> have used an existing samba config file which worked with samba 2.0.x.
> 
> I am using security = server

Use security = domain and your life will be easier.  Server mode security 
requires that smbd maintain an open connection to the password server
for the entire life of the client's connection.





cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NYk+IR7qMdg1EfYRAjaoAKDtKwf8JXUZxkmjJTVZ9eiTa5wMjgCePViK
AYVb0NROtVqZmCVLRV62Uvo=
=x5lS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Virus Protection ... Which one...?

[Stephen Kuhn]

On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 00:36, Ryan Beisner wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I've found a few different packages (RAV, Kaspersky,Vexira, Clam ...)
> which offer Anti-Virus features for Linux servers.  It looks like RAV
> specifically supports Samba servers.
> 
> 
> My question is:
> 
> Can anyone relay their experiences / opinions / thoughts about which one
> would work best in a multiple-server environment (~100 Windows Clients)?
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance -- all comments are welcome.
> 
> -Ryan Beisner
> 

In the sense of "keeping it simple" - I got the free version of f-prot
and use it in a script called out every hour to scan my Samba shares
(even works on mounted shares to Windows machines) - once I got it
setup, it was great - fast and easy and helps to keep everything clean
here...I went for "free" because of budgeting...and well, can't complain
- especially after this past weekend! We're up and running!

-- 
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 06:25:01 +1100
  6:25am  up 20:14,  5 users,  load average: 0.52, 0.55, 0.38
--
|____  | kuhn media australia|
|   / ,, /| |'-.   | http://kma.0catch.com   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  |=|
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  | stephen kuhn|
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  |/ ._/  |"| |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|  |'.  `\ | | |icq: 5483808 |
|  ;"""/ / | | | |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389|
|  '  `-`' " " | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU   |
--
 linux user:267497 * RH 8.0 * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting
--

Half the world is composed of people who have something to say and can't,
and the other half who have nothing to say and keep on saying it.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] winbind withoutt PAM

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> As I understood from Samba documentation winbind can run without PAM 
> installed; PAM is needed only if I need interactive login in the Unix 
> box of NT domain users. Am I correct?

Yes.  Pam is optional but the NSS library is required.



cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NYhQIR7qMdg1EfYRAnf7AKDtClBBQoaJbXjxGl+M/xbFdRF4TQCgjP0O
P0uj0qAruWrDnE68H6ooiJA=
=eq8a
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Virus Alterts - Was: Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)

[Markus Schabel]

Ken Schneider wrote:

I guess it's time to unsubscribe from this list since they don't know
how to setup and use anti-virus software on the list server.


At least today some antivir software would be really great, or at least
some mechanism to block all the antivir-software-answers to the list...

should be no problem to set up a free antivirus-mail-filtering software
(e.g. clamav with AMaViS)...

--
mfg
Markus Schabel
++
| TGM - Die Schule der Technik,   IT-Service |
|A-1200 Wien, Wexstrasse 19-23   |
| Tel.: +43(1)33126/316 Fax: +43(1)33126/154 |
| eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
| FSF Associate Member #597  |
| Linux User #259595 (http://counter.li.org) |
++

Computers are like airconditioners:
  They stop working properly if you open windows.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] NVC for Domino Virus Warning!

[Wolfgang . Czolbe]

(Embedded image moved to file: pic30161.pcx)

NVC for Domino Virus Warning



This is an automatically generated message.

A possible virus, 'Yaha.E@mm', was detected in attachment
'Neu_Textdokument__2_.jpg_.bat' in document '[Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument
(2)'.

Database: 'KAWILK01 Mailbox'.

Document was apparently created on '27.01.2003 19:33:42' by
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recipients and CCs: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

The infected attachment was quarantined.

The attachment was deleted.



More info at: www.norman.com





pic30161.pcx
Description: Paintbrush

Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)

[Jon Niehof]

The virus message came from the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER to me as well as many
others. I don't need to read many messages about how someone's email
server caught a virus that was passed through the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER by
someone posting to the list.

It's not the listserv's problem that we got spammed; it's 
the idiot autoresponders.

Heck, the samba list doesn't even munge the from line so 
there's really no excuse to send the message to the list.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba on masqueraded server

[degen]

Hello

I'm trying to setup a samba server on my router box, the problem I have is
that I need to have different configurations on the internal and
external interfaces.

Internally the server should act as a domain logon master for my windows
machines and to the outside world it should participate in a workgroup and
maybe be a local master, but not domain master.

I tried setting up two different smb.conf-files which work flawlessly on
their own and do exactly what I want them to do, but I don't know how I
can use them together at the same time, if I try to start several
instances of smbd and nmbd it complains and refuses to start the second
server.

There is also a WINS-server on the outer network which I like to use when
browsing on the computers on the inner network. But I would not like my
inner computers advertised to this server. Is there something special to
think about when setting this up?

Thanks
P Degerman, Sweden

PS. Please cc me as I'm not on the list DS.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Remove the infected user

[John P Santos]

Would someone please do the list a favor and remove the infected user from
the mailing list?

At 14:11 27/1/2003, you wrote:
>Symantec Email Proxy deleted the following email message:
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: samba digest, Vol 1 #2117 - 14 msgs
>

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] winbind LOGON_FAILURE

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Daniel Fenwick wrote:

> Can anyone tell me what the following error in my log. files
> means?  It is new since upgrading to 227a.
> 
> rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_query_aliasmem(2626)   _samr_query_aliasmem:
> Not yet implemented

The client issued an RPC call that we know about but have not implemented 
in Samba 2.2.  It is asking about group membership.




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NYR4IR7qMdg1EfYRAln8AJ9WtvFwRIY0hudQIXeqJq8nOeuTmgCgk1hc
XQmxwtj3akH3wSQ2k6P05dI=
=KZOn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba-to-samba migration

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Chris Nolan wrote:

> Additionally, does anyone have any experience in setting up an entirely
> Samba-driven solution for fail-over? This place has two servers, and I
> was hoping to be able to setup Samba on both so that if the main one
> blows up/dies/gets stolen, everyone can still logon to the domain and
> see all their files (everyone saves all their stuff to the Samba box via
> drives mapped to their home directories and other places). All advice
> gratefully received. All amusing flames cheefully printed and stuck on
> the wall at the premises of subject.

Please see the Samba PDC/BDC HOWTO for more information.  Its included in 
the the Samba distribution.





cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NYOHIR7qMdg1EfYRAkjlAKDsa0rJWYbzGmMnbOIzBYklSb098wCfXFjQ
pk25ZcIeY8AgGedo3QdTNLU=
=NcKu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Antigen found FILE FILTER= *.bat file

[Antigen]

Antigen for Exchange found Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
   
   
  .bat matching FILE FILTER= *.bat file filter.
The file is currently Removed.  The message, "[Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument ", was
sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was discovered in SMTP Messages\Inbound
located at tesco/First Administrative Group/SW2KE.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Virus incident

[[IM_T-EXCH] Panda Antivirus for Exchange Server]

Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :IM_T-EXCH

Sent by :   
Address :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject :   [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Date :  27/01/2003  20:33

Der er virus i Posten ( Internet Connect )

File :  Neu Textdokument .jpg
.bat
   Virus :  W32/Lentin.E - Deleted

http://www.pandasoftware.com

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] InterScan NT Alert

[VirusAdmin]

Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.

Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:34:41 -
Method: Mail
From:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File:   Neu Textdokument (2).jpg   
   
  .bat
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus:  WORM_YAHA.G 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)

[Ken Schneider]

The virus message came from the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER to me as well as many
others. I don't need to read many messages about how someone's email
server caught a virus that was passed through the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER by
someone posting to the list.

If someone that maintains the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER could find out who is
sending the messages with the virus they could unsubscribe that one
person and notify them. That way the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER would NOT be
passing on more virii.



On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's not the list, it's the recipient's who have autoresponders set up.  
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Ken Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
> 
> 
> > I guess it's time to unsubscribe from this list since they don't know
> > how to setup and use anti-virus software on the list server.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 14:29, archiv24 wrote:
> > *** WARNING **
> > This message has been scanned by MDaemon AntiVirus and was found to 
> > contain infected attachment(s). Please review the list below.
> > 
> > Attachment Virus name Action taken
> > --
> > Neu Textdokument (2).jpg .batI-Worm.Lentin.g Removed 
> > 
> > **
> > Zeit 23:48:06 26.01.2003 Typ Bericht Betreff Eine Flotte nach 1:113:9
> > erreichte ihr Ziel Nachricht Angreifer (1:110:1) Flugzeuge Gesamt
> > Verluste Raven 20 12 Verteidiger (1:113:9) Flugzeuge Gesamt Verluste
> > Keine Flugzeuge vorhanden Defensivanlagen Gesamt V
> > .
> > .
> > More details attached
> > 
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> 
> ___
> All emails incoming and outgoing from SBS Forestry Inc.
> are scanned by Kaspersky Antivirus.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] NT Domain to Win2K Domain

[Aldo Damian Ambriz Martinez -- Unix SysAdmin]

Hi everybody:

The Windows Team is planing to upgrade the NT 4.0 Domain, we have now,
to a Windows 2000 Domain, Does anybody know if it's represent a problem
to my Samba Box???

If yes; what will I have to do??

Thanks

-- 

  Aldo Damian Ambriz Martinez
   Depto Sistemas Operativos
El Palacio de Hierro S.A. de C.V
  52295401 ext 1118


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Beginner feeling a little better now

[Mark Butcher]

Hi Samba Mailing list

Many thanks for the help as I had problems with my first Linux session and
couldn't get the Linux box on to the Windows network.

I seem to have managed to get things working by adding "netbios name =
webserver" to the config file. Then creating and adding a password to a
user account using "smbpasswd -a NEWUSER"

The original config (delivered with SuSE) had no such entry and didn't
mention it - seems to be important though

Suddenly I could see the Linux box and can send data to it in the new
user's directory. It appears in my workgroup MJB called WEBSERVER and it is
possible to work in the home/NEWUSER/ directory.



My favorite tip was from Christoph:
>A) as a beginner you should use swat to edit smb.config
>A.1) open yast2, choose yast2 module, choose network basics, choose the
>icon with the traffic lights.
>Choose : yes start inet ...
>Choose the line with "swat" in front and make it aktive, save changes.
>
>Now swat is reachable through http://yourcomputer:901 locally and
>remotely.
>Use your root password to connect.

Works great and allows an inexperienced user like myself to make fast
progress in a user friendly environment.

Least favorite tip:
>Learn bash, vi, sed, grep, cat, less, find, cd, ls, chown, chmod, locate,
and cut.
>All of these, except vi, have good man pages (man ls or man bash). There
are
>books on bash, vi, and sed, and they are needed.

Good way to freighten anyone back to the Windows world.




What I can not yet do is transfer data from the Linux box to a Windows PC
from the Linux machine - I don't know how to view the network  (In
Conquerer there is a LAN view symbol but it says "No protocol" when I click
it Must be an easy way somewhere and will keep on poking around.

Cheers

Mark


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

[Administrator]

ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).

Sender = archiv24
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 19:33:43
Engine/Pattern = 5.600-1011/447

Action on virus found:
The attachment Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
   
 
.bat contains WORM_YAHA.G virus. ScanMail has Moved it.  The attachment was moved to 
C:\Programme\Trend\Smex\Virus\Neu Textdokument (2).jpg 
_  


Warning to recipient. ScanMail has detected a virus.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Multiple Domains/Workgroups (again sigh)

[Steve Morley]

Hi All,

After a couple of months break (and running only a single instance of SAMBA)
I once again need to try and get two simultaneous instances of SAMBA running
on the same machine, each serving up a different domain/workgroup.

Here's the scoop:

one machine, with dual NICs, the first one is on 192.168.1 (students) and the
second one is on 192.168.2 (staff).  Here's the diff on the conf files,
smb.conf.students & smb.conf.staff:

-su-2.05b# diff smb.conf.students smb.conf.staff
3c3
workgroup = STAFF
5,7c5,7
hosts allow = 192.168.2. 127.
>interfaces = 192.168.2.200/24
>pid directory = /var/run

Here's my startup script:

> -su-2.05b# more /etc/startsamba
> #!/usr/local/bin/bash
> 
> /usr/local/sbin/smbd -D -s /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.staff
> /usr/local/sbin/nmbd -D -s /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.staff
> 
> /usr/local/sbin/smbd -D -s /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.students
> /usr/local/sbin/nmbd -D -s /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.students

If I comment out the staff launch, the student domain works as expected.  When
I try to launch the staff one though, neither works, but there's no errors in
the log files...

- Should I bump up the logging level?
- Do I need to add a piddir directive at launch time as well as having it in
  the .conf file?

It's 2.2.6pre2 (built from ports on FreeBSD 4.7-Stable).  I know there's 2.2.7
but really don't want to risk breaking what's working, as this box is live and
can't afford to go down.  But...  if someone knows for certain tht this was
broken in 2.2.6 or something, that would help big time.

TIA
Steve
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Fw: [Samba] ScanMail Message: To Recipient file blocking settings matched and action taken.

[Sönke Ruempler]

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:28 PM
Subject: [Samba] ScanMail Message: To Recipient file blocking settings
matched and action taken.


> ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked an attachment.

the samba server uses m$ exchange?? confusing :-)

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba as PDC for WinXP, Win98 and Win95

[Jerome Warnier]

joao marka wrote:

well, just to let ya know my case, the first macine w/ xp pro i´ve 
installed here, i´ve tried everything (including the signorseal patch) 
and it didn´t worked out... just after the service pack...
the second machine, i´ve just installed the service pack 1 and... voila! 
it joined the domain without need to run the signorseal patch..
I can now confirm the XP stations on which I failed have XP Pro and SP1 
applied.
Anyone has another (better) idea?

i don´t know if someone had the same experience w/ XP ( just one litle 
detail... brazilian portuguese version...)

but, anyway, try the patch!


At 15:48 27/01/03, Michael Paarmann wrote:

Hi!

If done the same job, but i've replaced a novell server with a samba 
pdc based on SuSE Linux. I had different problems with Win XP Pro, but 
none with the other WinOS.
Have you installed the "SignOrSeal"-Patch? Without this, you can't 
logon with a win xp machine on a samba domain.
Use Google to find this patch.

Regards,
Michael






At 13:54 27.01.2003 -0200, you wrote:

well, first thing to know... is your Xp home or professional ?
if is home, bad news, great troubles...
if professional, try The Windows XP service pack 1, here at my 
network it has worked very well...
but if is home... all logon scripts and profiles will be stored 
locally at the client side, no way to do different.
another thing to do is to create a machine account on the samba side, 
just like an NT4 machine.

At 12:20 27/01/03, you wrote:

Hello!

Ive just got the lovely job of converting and old Windows NT 4 
fileserver to FreeBSD, ive set up samba before as a simple fileshare 
but this place requires roaming profile login from WinXP, Win98 and 
Win95 clients.
My question is whether or not any of you people have any experience 
with this and might be able to give some tips on the way? I've tried 
fidling with it but i cant get my WinXP clients to logon to the 
domain :(

I need all the help i can get :)

regards
Simon

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba








--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)

[Ken Schneider]

I guess it's time to unsubscribe from this list since they don't know
how to setup and use anti-virus software on the list server.



On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 14:29, archiv24 wrote:
*** WARNING **
This message has been scanned by MDaemon AntiVirus and was found to 
contain infected attachment(s). Please review the list below.

Attachment Virus name Action taken
--
Neu Textdokument (2).jpg .batI-Worm.Lentin.g Removed 

**
Zeit 23:48:06 26.01.2003 Typ Bericht Betreff Eine Flotte nach 1:113:9
erreichte ihr Ziel Nachricht Angreifer (1:110:1) Flugzeuge Gesamt
Verluste Raven 20 12 Verteidiger (1:113:9) Flugzeuge Gesamt Verluste
Keine Flugzeuge vorhanden Defensivanlagen Gesamt V
.
.
More details attached

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found or matched file blocking setting.

[System Attendant]

ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.

Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 13:32:20
Engine/Pattern = 6.510-1002/449

Action on message:
The attachment Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
.bat matched file blocking settings. ScanMail has taken the Moved action.
The attachment was moved to C:\Program Files\Trend\Smex\Alert\Neu
Textdokument (2).jpg
_


Warning to recipient: ScanMail has either blocked a file sent to you due to
file blocking rules or has detected a virus. If it was a virus and you've
received this message, it has most likely already been cleaned or deleted.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found or matched file blocking setting.

[System Attendant]

ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.

Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 12:31:59
Engine/Pattern = 6.510-1002/449

Action on message:
The attachment Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
.bat matched file blocking settings. ScanMail has taken the Moved action.
The attachment was moved to D:\Program Files\Trend\Smex\Alert\Neu
Textdokument (2).jpg
_


Warning to recipient. ScanMail has detected a virus.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found or matched file blocking setting.

[System Attendant]

ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.

Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 18:29:40
Engine/Pattern = 6.510-1002/449

Action on message:
The attachment Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
.bat matched file blocking settings. ScanMail has taken the Moved action.
The attachment was moved to C:\Program Files\Trend\Smex\Alert\Neu
Textdokument (2).jpg
_


Warning to recipient. ScanMail has detected a virus.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] ScanMail Message: To Recipient file blocking settings matched and action taken.

[Administrator]

ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked an attachment.

Sender = archiv24
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 13:28:41

Action on file blocking:
The attachment Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
   
 . 
.bat/O/X1/A[Samba] Fw: Neu 
Textdokument (2)/U
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] CSAV For Exchange 2000 - Virus Alert

[Administrator]

The file attachment "Neu Textdokument (2).jpg  
   
   
.bat" which was sent by ""archiv24" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" was infected with the 
"Infection: W32/Lentin.F@mm" virus. The file attachment was successfully disinfected.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)

[archiv24]

Zeit  23:48:06 26.01.2003
Typ  Bericht
Betreff  Eine Flotte nach 1:113:9 erreichte ihr Ziel
Nachricht  Angreifer (1:110:1)
Flugzeuge  Gesamt  Verluste
Raven  20 12

Verteidiger (1:113:9)
Flugzeuge  Gesamt  Verluste
Keine Flugzeuge vorhanden


Defensivanlagen  Gesamt  V..More details attached
<>

Re: [Samba] samba help

[Jon Niehof]

Alejandro Glez de Chaves Guerrero wrote:

What I try in this project is to extensive the PHP language with a library that
it conects to a SAMBA file server and makes the functions that alows us the
SMBCLIENT on the actually systems.

The samba website has a "development" section; scroll down 
near the bottom and there are a number of very helpful 
links. Then there is, of course, the source code.

Good luck.



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba as PDC for WinXP, Win98 and Win95

[joao marka]

well, just to let ya know my case, the first macine w/ xp pro i´ve 
installed here, i´ve tried everything (including the signorseal patch) and 
it didn´t worked out... just after the service pack...
the second machine, i´ve just installed the service pack 1 and... voila! it 
joined the domain without need to run the signorseal patch..

i don´t know if someone had the same experience w/ XP ( just one litle 
detail... brazilian portuguese version...)

but, anyway, try the patch!


At 15:48 27/01/03, Michael Paarmann wrote:
Hi!

If done the same job, but i've replaced a novell server with a samba pdc 
based on SuSE Linux. I had different problems with Win XP Pro, but none 
with the other WinOS.
Have you installed the "SignOrSeal"-Patch? Without this, you can't logon 
with a win xp machine on a samba domain.
Use Google to find this patch.

Regards,
Michael






At 13:54 27.01.2003 -0200, you wrote:
well, first thing to know... is your Xp home or professional ?
if is home, bad news, great troubles...
if professional, try The Windows XP service pack 1, here at my network it 
has worked very well...
but if is home... all logon scripts and profiles will be stored locally 
at the client side, no way to do different.
another thing to do is to create a machine account on the samba side, 
just like an NT4 machine.

At 12:20 27/01/03, you wrote:
Hello!

Ive just got the lovely job of converting and old Windows NT 4 
fileserver to FreeBSD, ive set up samba before as a simple fileshare but 
this place requires roaming profile login from WinXP, Win98 and Win95 clients.
My question is whether or not any of you people have any experience with 
this and might be able to give some tips on the way? I've tried fidling 
with it but i cant get my WinXP clients to logon to the domain :(

I need all the help i can get :)

regards
Simon

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] running a script when a user logs on (NOT netlogon!)

[Woerns Urstmann]

i want the server (which is running samba and is configured as PDC) to execute 
a simple shell script when a specific (or any?) user logs on with his nt 
machine. is this possible?

to clear the things, i do NOT mean a batch file that is executed on the 
client, it has to be executed on the server!

thanks, woerns
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] yup, i'm still stuck

[Bradley W. Langhorst]

On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 12:33, Jason Kirschenmann wrote:
> hi,
> the last piece of advice i got just reminded me of how new i am at this.  
> You said to check the logs and make sure the user has permissions for those 
> folders.  The log says alot of stuff, and i have no idea what any of it 
> means, if you want to see one, just ask and i can send you alot.
the best technique when debugging is to use 
   log file = /var/log/samba/log.smbd.%m
or something similar so that logs are broken out by which machine
connects.
you should probably start at log level 1 or 2 to see obvious errors.
they really do make sense when you see the lower log levels.

>  The other 
> thing.  how do i check if the user has permissions for the shared folders.  
> their set to 777, that's all i know how to do.  
777 means that everybody can do everything - are you sure that is what
you want?

> i have my security set to 
> domain, so as everyone on our domain should be able to access shares, but 
> that might just be a windows thing.  
are you sure you understand security=domain? You only use that when you
want to authenticate against a real windows server.  I think you still
have to have all the users on the samba machine unless you're using
winbind.  Maybe to just get things going a little you should try using
security=user instead.
Have you read the howto collection?

> once again, any help is good help.
well even well intentioned bad help is not good help - but i hope i'm
giving you 'helpful' help.

brad

-- 
Bradley W. Langhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Remote machines seen as UNKNOWN

[Patrick Percot]

Hello,

All my problems are solved, but I can't understand what was the reason
of those problems (I had problems with DNS and Apache too). 

I have reinstalled the  software, and everything works.  Possibly, the
hardware errors of the CDROM drive during installation, I have cleaned
the lens, and now there is no more timeouts.

I have learned a lot about Samba, which I hadn't learned otherwise :-)

Thanks.

-- 
Groupe Morbihannais d'Utilisateurs de Logiciels Libres http://tuxbihan.apinc.org
Protégez votre vie privée (GNU Privacy Guard) http://www.gnupg.org

Patrick Percot.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba as PDC for WinXP, Win98 and Win95

[Michael Paarmann]

Hi!

If done the same job, but i've replaced a novell server with a samba pdc 
based on SuSE Linux. I had different problems with Win XP Pro, but none 
with the other WinOS.
Have you installed the "SignOrSeal"-Patch? Without this, you can't logon 
with a win xp machine on a samba domain.
Use Google to find this patch.

Regards,
Michael






At 13:54 27.01.2003 -0200, you wrote:
well, first thing to know... is your Xp home or professional ?
if is home, bad news, great troubles...
if professional, try The Windows XP service pack 1, here at my network it 
has worked very well...
but if is home... all logon scripts and profiles will be stored locally at 
the client side, no way to do different.
another thing to do is to create a machine account on the samba side, just 
like an NT4 machine.

At 12:20 27/01/03, you wrote:
Hello!

Ive just got the lovely job of converting and old Windows NT 4 fileserver 
to FreeBSD, ive set up samba before as a simple fileshare but this place 
requires roaming profile login from WinXP, Win98 and Win95 clients.
My question is whether or not any of you people have any experience with 
this and might be able to give some tips on the way? I've tried fidling 
with it but i cant get my WinXP clients to logon to the domain :(

I need all the help i can get :)

regards
Simon

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] more info - NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote file

[Ben Scarbeau]

Thanks to those who had suggestions on my last 
post, but none of those seems to have worked.  I have narrowed down the 
problem a bit though, seems users can't write to a share that is not their 
primary group.  For example:  Bob's primary group is Bob and secondary 
group is Sally.  Bob can write to the Bob group share but not the Sally 
group share.  Anymore thoughts/suggestions.  Thanks again in 
advance.
 
Ben
 
Following is the original message:
 

Am having trouble getting samba to work properly it 
seems.  Setup went smooth, the processes are running.  Can log in with 
smbclient no problem.  Can 'get' files no problem, but whenever I try to 
'put' a file I get the following error: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote 
file '/filename'.
 
Anyone else run into this error.  I have found 
help on this error relating to login problems but not to file problems.  
Any help would be appreciated.  The following is what is in my smb.conf 
file.  Thanks.
 
[global]
 
netbios name = POGO
workgroup=POGOSAMBA
security=user
 
[share-files]
path = /home/share
readonly=no
 
Ben

[Samba] yup, i'm still stuck

[Jason Kirschenmann]

hi,
the last piece of advice i got just reminded me of how new i am at this.  
You said to check the logs and make sure the user has permissions for those 
folders.  The log says alot of stuff, and i have no idea what any of it 
means, if you want to see one, just ask and i can send you alot. The other 
thing.  how do i check if the user has permissions for the shared folders.  
their set to 777, that's all i know how to do.  i have my security set to 
domain, so as everyone on our domain should be able to access shares, but 
that might just be a windows thing.  once again, any help is good help.
thanks,
jason

_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] samba help

[Alejandro Glez de Chaves Guerrero]

Hi, I´m an university student of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria ( Canary 
Islands, Spain). I apply to you because I´m begining to develop my last 
project, I´m at the end of my Computer Engeneer career. What I try in 
this project is to extensive the PHP language with a library that it 
conects to a SAMBA file server and makes the functions that alows us the 
SMBCLIENT on the actually systems. The actually developments that I 
could see ( including SAMBA2WWW) are developed making use of the 
function system that includes the majority of the languages to make 
calls to own operative system functions. My idea is to try don´t ude 
this function and use others mechanisms to obtein that those who use 
them could do it quietest it´s a security question. And also of trying 
that a language so extended as the PHP is evident that have a function 
library to the conexions with SAMBA. Well what I´d like is that if you 
can and with all the experience that I suppose that you have, you would 
indicate me if it´s possible to do my project and would send me all the 
information that you think it could de useful any way. First of all 
thank you and I hope to recieve your news as soon as possible.

--
Alejandro Glez de Chaves Guerrero
Dpto. Diseño y programación web
http:\\www.cana-web.com
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
movil: 646154545



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Configuring Samba on Dynix

[Healy, Columb]

Title: Configuring Samba on Dynix





I'm trying to run ./configure on DYNIX/ptx 4.0 V4.4.5 i386


When I do I get a message about not being able to find test files. I've tried setting _SEQUENT_CC_ to -Wc,+abi-socket which has solved network type problems in the past but it still fails.

Can anyone help?


Thanks


Columb Healy
ORS Unix Support
Siemens Business Services
Tel - 01253 793792
Mob - 07776 225 976
Fax - 01253 793924

Re: [Samba] samba + apache + XP ... weird

[joao marka]

thanks a lot!

At 13:01 27/01/03, you wrote:

You will need to turn off the webclient under services, unless you need to 
access shares through http.

Patrick

joao marka wrote:

I´m having samo strange behaviour from my XP machines.

Sometimes (most always) my XP machines logged onte the sambe (as PDC on 
the corporate network, 40 clients +-) are serching for the samba shares 
into the apache server, causing some performance issues in browsing the 
shares, sometimes even hanging the client´s explorer.

the apache log says :

10.11.16.15 - - [27/Jan/2003:06:57:45 -0200] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1" 200 - 
"-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.15 - - [27/Jan/2003:06:57:46 -0200] "PROPFIND /netlogon 
HTTP/1.1" 404 280 "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.15 - - [27/Jan/2003:06:57:51 -0200] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1" 200 - 
"-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.15 - - [27/Jan/2003:06:57:51 -0200] "PROPFIND /avupdate 
HTTP/1.1" 404 280 "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.15 - - [27/Jan/2003:06:58:43 -0200] "PROPFIND /custos_geral 
HTTP/1.1" 404 284 "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.11 - - [27/Jan/2003:07:18:01 -0200] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1" 200 - 
"-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.11 - - [27/Jan/2003:07:18:01 -0200] "PROPFIND /homes HTTP/1.1" 
404 277 "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.11 - - [27/Jan/2003:07:18:05 -0200] "PROPFIND /avupdate 
HTTP/1.1" 404 280 "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.15 - - [27/Jan/2003:07:31:59 -0200] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1" 200 - 
"-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.15 - - [27/Jan/2003:07:31:59 -0200] "PROPFIND /aplic HTTP/1.1" 
404 277 "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.11 - - [27/Jan/2003:07:34:42 -0200] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1" 200 - 
"-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.11 - - [27/Jan/2003:07:34:42 -0200] "PROPFIND /custos_geral 
HTTP/1.1" 404 284 "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"
10.11.16.11 - - [27/Jan/2003:07:34:48 -0200] "PROPFIND /homes HTTP/1.1" 
404 277 "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600"

where 10.11.16.11 / 15 are the clients IP and after "PROPFIND /" are the 
samba share´s name which the client are serarching into the apache server.

the microsoft site says absolutly nothing worthy about this (or i haven´t 
found...) but it seems to be an office 2k issue.

does anyone knows anything about this ?




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba as PDC for WinXP, Win98 and Win95

[joao marka]

well, first thing to know... is your Xp home or professional ?
if is home, bad news, great troubles...
if professional, try The Windows XP service pack 1, here at my network it 
has worked very well...
but if is home... all logon scripts and profiles will be stored locally at 
the client side, no way to do different.
another thing to do is to create a machine account on the samba side, just 
like an NT4 machine.

At 12:20 27/01/03, you wrote:
Hello!

Ive just got the lovely job of converting and old Windows NT 4 fileserver 
to FreeBSD, ive set up samba before as a simple fileshare but this place 
requires roaming profile login from WinXP, Win98 and Win95 clients.
My question is whether or not any of you people have any experience with 
this and might be able to give some tips on the way? I've tried fidling 
with it but i cant get my WinXP clients to logon to the domain :(

I need all the help i can get :)

regards
Simon

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba