[Samba] Autoresponse
account closed permanently -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: Details
Wir haben Ihre e-mail erhalten. Vielen Dank. Ihr PixelPerfect Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Your details
GUTEN TAG! Manuel Staub arbeitet nicht mehr für DER LEADER. Ihr Mail wurde umgeleitet an: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Für private Anliegen mailen Sie bitte auf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Besten Dank! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbfs block size
I've been searching everywhere and just can't figure out how to change the smbfs read size. Right now its defaulting to 4096 and I'd like to increase it. If I use smbclient to the same server I get a read size of 65536 which speeds my transfers up quite a bit. I'm using kernel 2.4.18 and samba 2.2.3a. Thanks! Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NAV detected a virus in a document you authored.
Please contact your system administrator. The infected component in the scanned document was deleted. Virus Information: The attachment your_document.pif contained the virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was deleted. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: That movie
GUTEN TAG! Manuel Staub arbeitet nicht mehr für DER LEADER. Ihr Mail wurde umgeleitet an: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Für private Anliegen mailen Sie bitte auf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Besten Dank! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: Approved
Wir haben Ihre e-mail erhalten. Vielen Dank. Ihr PixelPerfect Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] MIMEDefang Notification
An e-mail you sent with message-id NOQUEUE was modified by our mail scanning software. The recipients were: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here are the details of the modification: Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] found in mail -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Roaming Profiles
I'm hoping someone can help explain this... I am running Samba3.0RC1 on Redhat 9.0 as a PDC. A quick run down of the symptoms: When connecting to the PDC from a Win2k machine with an account that does not currently have a profile on the PDC, Win2k creates the profile directory of the PDC. When logging off the Win2k machine, all contents are pushed into the profile stored on the PDC. Works great!! This gets real screwy. If I then log back on to the Win2k machine with the same account, everything is normal. If I create a Folder and a Text file on the Desktop and then log out, again they are pushed to the PDC profile. Still working great!!! Now, if I log in again, the folder and text file are on the desktop (as expected). If I delete both the folder and text file and then log out, the text file is deleted from the profile on the PDC, but the Folder is not! When I log back on to the Win2k machine, the text file is gone, but the Folder remains!! Here is how I have my profiles share set up: [profiles] path = /somepath/profiles browseable = Yes read only = No writeable = Yes create mode = 0700 directory mode = 0700 When I first log into the Win2k machine, the profile directory shows the permissions: drwx-- 13 stevem domusers 4096 Aug 22 10:46 stevem Here are the permissions on the /somepath/profiles/stevem/Desktop path: drwx--2 stevem root6 Aug 22 10:20 New Folder drwx--2 stevem root6 Aug 22 10:20 New Folder (2) drwx--2 stevem root6 Aug 22 13:09 xyz These are never deleted from the profile after they are deleted from the Desktop. I have even set rwx permissions across the board and they will not delete. Anyone have any suggestions? The log files don't show any issues on the samb end. It's like a permission problem, but the user can create the profile, add items, but not remove directories. Thanks!!! Mike Samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: Details
Wir haben Ihre e-mail erhalten. Vielen Dank. Ihr PixelPerfect Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Out of Office AutoReply: Approved
I will be out of the office on Friday, Aug. 22 and will not be checking email. For deployment or logistics issues, contact Frank Dillon (336-760-8120 ext. 1230 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]). For repair or facilities issues, contact Mike Bartlett (336-760-8120 ext. 1209 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]). -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Thanks for the e-mail. Help is on the way!
Dear babystyle shopper: Thank you for your message. Your email has been received and will be reviewed as soon as a Customer Care Agent is available. Our Customer Care Department is staffed Monday through Friday (excluding holidays) and we strive to resolve all inquiries in a timely manner. In the meantime, we recommend you checkout our online Help section (http://www.babystyle.com/default.asp?load=help), which has answers to frequently asked questions such as our shipping rates and return policies. Thanks again, The babystyle Team eStyle Order Department Phone: 1.877.eStyles (1.877.378.9537) Fax: 1.213.228.6896 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Address: http://www.babystyle.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] LDAP: add machine script required?
Nick Urbanik wrote: > Dear Folks, > > Thanks again Jerry. > > "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Nick Urbanik wrote: > > > > > If I use sambaSamAccount with samba 3.0.0 RC1, do I need to define an > > > add machine script? I want to be able to add machines to the domain > > > as simply as possible (i.e., "automatically"). So is an add machine > > > script needed, or does samba contain code to create the accounts > > > itself? > > > > Yes. 3.0 no longer defaults to using the 'add user script' to create > > machine accounts. See the WHATSNEW.txt > > Thanks, yes, I read that many times in the past, and before mailing to > this list have tried to understand when ldapsam_add_sam_account() in > samba-3.0.0rc1/source/passdb/pdb_ldap.c gets called and what it will do if > a machine account does not exist, or whether an add machine script is > required. > > So what _should_ the add machine script do with an ldapsam backend based > on sambaSamAccount? > >* Create the entire entry complete with sambaSamAccount, account > objectClasses? Or >* Create the entire entry complete with sambaSamAccount, account and > posixAccount objectClasses? Or >* just create a posixAccount for the machine? Or >* just create an account placeholder entry to be filled in by > ldapsam_add_sam_account() in samba-3.0.0rc1/source/passdb/pdb_ldap.c? > > As I mentioned earlier, the man page is not so clear (to me): > > add machine script (G) > This is the full pathname to a script that will be run by > smbd(8) when a machine is added to it's domain using the admin- > istrator username and password method. > > > This option is only required when using sam back-ends tied to > > the Unix uid method of RID calculation such as smbpasswd. This > option is only available in Samba 3.0. > > My question is simply what should the add machine script do (now that you > have clarified that I need one)? Just a rough, approximate pointer to an answer would be great. I know this list is full of questioners and not many answerers, and now is flooded by silly virus notifications. -- Nick Urbanik RHCE nicku(at)vtc.edu.hk Dept. of Information & Communications Technology Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Tsing Yi) Tel: (852) 2436 8576, (852) 2436 8713 Fax: (852) 2436 8526 PGP: 53 B6 6D 73 52 EE 1F EE EC F8 21 98 45 1C 23 7B ID: 7529555D GPG: 7FFA CDC7 5A77 0558 DC7A 790A 16DF EC5B BB9D 2C24 ID: BB9D2C24 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Thank you!
Wir haben Ihre e-mail erhalten. Vielen Dank. Ihr PixelPerfect Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Online Support Form Pilot Project
We are piloting a new support request process. To ensure your issue is queued and responded to as quickly as possible, this service has been replaced with a new and improved way of submitting support requests directly to the IT Support Centre. All support requests must now be entered directly by clicking on the link below: http://www.its.queensu.ca/itsc/helpform.html After submitting your request, you will receive a confirmation email containing an issue number, which should be used for all further contact regarding this issue. Thank you for participating in this pilot project. Please send any comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Support Centre -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Your details
Thank you for e-mailing President Bush. Your ideas and comments are very important to him. Because of the large volume of e-mail received, the President cannot personally respond to each message. However, the White House staff considers and reports citizen ideas and concerns. In addition to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have developed White House Web Mail, an automated e-mail response system. Please access http://www.whitehouse.gov/webmail to submit comments on a specific issue. Additionally, we welcome you to visit our website for the most up-to-date information on current events and topics of interest to you. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Mac "DAVE" server + Linux samba 2.2.8a client = missingfirst char
I'm running stock RH9, which has the samba-2.2.7a-8.9.0 RPM installed on it. My friend has a Mac running OSX and the "DAVE" file sharing software. I can mount his shared folder using the following command: smbmount //tritanium/graphics /mnt/tritanium ...and I can see all the files in that folder when I do "ls /mnt/tritanium." But... The first character of every filename is missing! For example: the file named ".DS_Store" shows up as: -rwxr-xr-x1 root21508 Aug 22 15:21 DS_Store* The folder named "Cats" shows up as: drwxr-xr-x1 root 4096 Jun 22 12:28 ats/ I STFW for some answers but found none. I also RTFS (read the fine source) but could not determine why this was happening. Any suggestions on how I can fix it? Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thanks, Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: Your application
GUTEN TAG! Manuel Staub arbeitet nicht mehr für DER LEADER. Ihr Mail wurde umgeleitet an: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Für private Anliegen mailen Sie bitte auf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Besten Dank! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] In my absence...
Greetings, I've left my position as Senior Web Developer for O'Reilly & Associates, effective October 15, 2002. Please direct any work-related email to Nancy Abila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), if you need to contact me for other reasons, please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Thank you!
--[This is an automatically generated email notification.]-- M A I L W A T C H V I R U S A L E R T ! You recently sent a message containing a known virus - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ED). The message was sent on 8/20/2003 11:57:27 PM. The subject of the message was: Re: Thank you! The message was sent to the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] One or more of the recipients listed is a MailWatch customer. As a result, their copy of the message has been quarantined in a special confinement area at MailWatch and can only be released by their system administrator. This message is only meant to serve as a notification that your message was not delivered to all of the designated recipients. No action is required on your part. Please note, however, that the detection of a virus in a message you sent may be an indication that your computer system has already been compromised by a virus. Violated Policy:Virus - Inbound Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ED) found in attachment thank_you.pif. Remedial action (clean virus) requested. Message delivered. It is STRONGLY recommended that you check your entire system to determine the extent of this viral infection. For more information detailing how MailWatch can be used to protect your Internet email from unwanted solicitations, large or specific types of attachments, viral infections, and inappropriate content please visit our website or contact MailWatch at the number listed below. NOTE: This is an automated email notification. Please do NOT reply directly to this message! Message ID: 3233142473-2-218250001 ** MailWatch has scanned your e-mail message and determined it can not be delivered as originally sent. MailWatch can help you avoid these problems in the future by scanning your e-mail for viruses, Spam and objectionable content. Visit http://www.MailWatch.com to read about the benefits of MailWatch. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Thank you!
--[This is an automatically generated email notification.]-- M A I L W A T C H V I R U S A L E R T ! You recently sent a message containing a known virus - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message was sent on 8/20/2003 11:57:27 PM. The subject of the message was: Thank you! The message was sent to the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] One or more of the recipients listed is a MailWatch customer. As a result, their copy of the message has been quarantined in a special confinement area at MailWatch and can only be released by their system administrator. This message is only meant to serve as a notification that your message was not delivered to all of the designated recipients. No action is required on your part. Please note, however, that the detection of a virus in a message you sent may be an indication that your computer system has already been compromised by a virus. Violated Policy:Virus - Inbound Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] found in attachment your_details.pif. Remedial action (clean virus) requested. Message delivered. It is STRONGLY recommended that you check your entire system to determine the extent of this viral infection. For more information detailing how MailWatch can be used to protect your Internet email from unwanted solicitations, large or specific types of attachments, viral infections, and inappropriate content please visit our website or contact MailWatch at the number listed below. NOTE: This is an automated email notification. Please do NOT reply directly to this message! Message ID: 3233142473-2-203250001 ** MailWatch has scanned your e-mail message and determined it can not be delivered as originally sent. MailWatch can help you avoid these problems in the future by scanning your e-mail for viruses, Spam and objectionable content. Visit http://www.MailWatch.com to read about the benefits of MailWatch. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] A virus was detected in your message.
Virus Detection Alert Your message sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject: "Re: Re: My details", sent on: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:26:36 --0500 has been found to contain a virus and has not been delivered. Please clean the infected attachment and resend the message. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] joining ADS domain with samba
When I used the command "./net ads join -U ADMINISTRATOR" it asked me for the password, after I entered the password it came back with a responce of: [2003/08/22 08:53:16, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(267) krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found) [2003/08/22 08:53:16, 0] Libads/ldap.c:ads_join_realm(1292) Host account for already exists - deleting old account Joined to realm Also when I run "./wbinfo -t" it returns with a error of : checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was (0x0) Could not check secret -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] a solution to the semaphore timeout.
I would like to say a big "thank you" to Gerald "Jerry" Carter, as he posted a long time ago the solution to the semaphore problem when using win2k to connect Samba. As I searched this mailing list for a solution to this problem, I noticed that many people had this same problem, but no solution appeared. So I post this solution again, because I'm sure more people will encouter this error and the post of Jerry can be missed easily in the mass of posts here. If, when using win2k when trying to connect a samba share, you encounter a message error saying "semaphore timed out", then check your DNS. If "route" answers much slower than "route -n", then you probably have a bad route somewhere that makes the semaphore time out. "Pifou" -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: Wicked screensaver
Wir haben Ihre e-mail erhalten. Vielen Dank. Ihr PixelPerfect Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Thank you!
--[This is an automatically generated email notification.]-- M A I L W A T C H V I R U S A L E R T ! You recently sent a message containing a known virus - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message was sent on 8/20/2003 10:31:33 PM. The subject of the message was: Re: Thank you! The message was sent to the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] One or more of the recipients listed is a MailWatch customer. As a result, their copy of the message has been quarantined in a special confinement area at MailWatch and can only be released by their system administrator. This message is only meant to serve as a notification that your message was not delivered to all of the designated recipients. No action is required on your part. Please note, however, that the detection of a virus in a message you sent may be an indication that your computer system has already been compromised by a virus. Violated Policy:Virus - Inbound Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] found in attachment details.pif. Remedial action (clean virus) requested. Message delivered. It is STRONGLY recommended that you check your entire system to determine the extent of this viral infection. For more information detailing how MailWatch can be used to protect your Internet email from unwanted solicitations, large or specific types of attachments, viral infections, and inappropriate content please visit our website or contact MailWatch at the number listed below. NOTE: This is an automated email notification. Please do NOT reply directly to this message! Message ID: 3233090933-2-202250001 ** MailWatch has scanned your e-mail message and determined it can not be delivered as originally sent. MailWatch can help you avoid these problems in the future by scanning your e-mail for viruses, Spam and objectionable content. Visit http://www.MailWatch.com to read about the benefits of MailWatch. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] more problems with rc1 + ADS: smbd sigsegv
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:57:40AM -0700, david williams wrote: > here's the tail end of the -d 10 log.host. It seems to not like the > encryption type. Which should I be using, and where should I change it? Can you please recompile with -g so we can get the symbols from the stack backtrace. That will tell us exactly where it's dying. Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] This is an alert from eSafe Relay 1
*** Anti-virus protection at Quintiles(2.2) has detected possible hostile content and has blocked delivery of this email message. The intended Quintiles recipient has been notified that your message could not be delivered intact. *** Time: 21:47:10 8/22/2003 Scan result: Mail modified to remove malicious content Protocol: SMTP in File Name / Mail Subject: /opt/eSafe/eSafeCR/SPOOL/1061498891 Source: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Details: document_9446.pif Msg #705 - The file type pif,APPLICATION/OCTET-STREAM is on the Restricted List. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: SID Calculation
I guess my question stems from the following situation. I have in LDAP a uidNumber of 1001. The only way i am able to get samba imformation populated into ldap is to change passdb backend from ldapsam to smbpasswd then create a samba user, then change passdb backend back to ldapsam, then finally use pdbedit to import from my smbpasswd file database. This seems sad I know but I cant seem to do it anyother way. I guess i could turn off schema checking in ldap but that would defeat the purpose of schema checking... This is why I need to know how to do a sid calculation as far as I can tell it takes the uidNumber multiplies it by 2 and adds 1000. The problem with that is my uidNumbers for users are 1000, 1001, 1002 etc and the machine account sids are conflicting with the 1002, 1003 users because of the order I added them in. Therefore can I just change the way sids are calculated for the machines so that it is different than the way it is done for users? Thanks, Spencer -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Jarabe wrote: >> If I am adding accounts manually to my ldap directory, and was curious if there is any magic in the sambaSID attibutes? Can i assign then incrementally? What abou the sambaPrimaryGroupSID what does that need to be?? 3 things: * if you do this, set 'enable rid algorithm = no' in smb.conf However, things may break at this point. * also see the code in sam/idmap_ldap.c that handles RID allocation. * make sure all the users you care about are stored in your passdb backend (ldapsam) and that all group mappings are setup correctly. cheers, jerry -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Rejected no-local
-- .. "nmr" unknown here in this Domain.. .. letter returned to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" .. -- Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: by iis.fhg.de with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:03:21 +0200 (MET DST) from mailgwb1.fraunhofer.de Received: from mailgwb1.fraunhofer.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgwb1.fraunhofer.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7MK2JBq018677 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:02:19 +0200 (MEST) Received: from SERVER ([218.14.78.94]) by mailgwb1.fraunhofer.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7MK1w3t018586 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:02:17 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Re: My details Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 4:02:25 +0800 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_NextPart_000_0448BF36" This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_0448BF36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_0448BF36-- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Use this patch immediately !
Dear friend , use this Internet Explorer patch now! There are dangerous virus in the Internet now! More than 500.000 already infected! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: Your application
Wir haben Ihre e-mail erhalten. Vielen Dank. Ihr PixelPerfect Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: samba-3.0.0rc1: nmbd PANIC: failed to create UCS2buffer
Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:36:52PM +0200, Angel Chiou wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > I am running into the same behaviour of nmbd with samba-3.0.0rc1 >> > compared to samba-3.0.0beta3: >> > >> > A few minutes after starting samba nmbd dies with the following >> > messages: >> > >> > [2003/08/19 09:28:23, 0] lib/charcnv.c:(194) >> > convert_string: Required 17, available 16 >> > [2003/08/19 09:28:23, 0] lib/charcnv.c:(194) >> > convert_string: Required 17, available 16 >> > [2003/08/19 09:29:19, 0] lib/charcnv.c:(194) >> > convert_string: Required 17, available 16 >> > [2003/08/19 09:29:19, 0] lib/charcnv.c:(194) >> > convert_string: Required 17, available 16 >> > [2003/08/19 09:29:53, 0] lib/charcnv.c:(272) >> > Conversion error: Illegal multibyte sequence(?) >> > [2003/08/19 09:29:53, 0] lib/util.c:(1462) >> > PANIC: failed to create UCS2 buffer >> > >> > >> > Any tips ? >> > >> > Thomas >> >> I'm also running into a strange nmbd behaviour with samba-3rc1. nmbd >> crashes aufter a couple of minutes: > > I think I've fixed this in the current SAMBA_3_0 CVS and the fix will > be in RC2. If you have CVS access could you try checking out the code > and letting me know if I've fixed it I'd appreciate it. > > Thanks, > > Jeremy. I downloaded SAMBA_3_0 from the CVS following the directions of the samba homepage. Unfortunately I'm not able to compile it. It may just only be a newbie Mistake. I might try again later or I'll just wait until RC2 comes out. Thanks anyway, Angel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] more problems with rc1 + ADS: smbd sigsegv
I don't think so. The admin passwords been changed. I turned Client and server signing off, it didn't make a difference. Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, david williams wrote: nope, it's mit 1.2.7 from the redhat rpm. Does this apply to you? (from the WHATSNEW) 2) Inclusion of new 'security = ads' option for integration with an Active Directory domain using the native Windows Kerberos 5 and LDAP protocols. MIT kerberos 1.3.1 supports the ARCFOUR-HMAC-MD5 encryption type which is neccessary for servers on which the administrator password has not been changed, or kerberos-enabled SMB connections to servers that require Kerberos SMB signing. Besides this one difference, either MIT or Heimdal Kerberos distributions are usable by Samba 3.0. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/RlqaIR7qMdg1EfYRAh3UAKDJGl+vLs8nWmVe8bqUhzQU8r+ujQCg1UOk 2xoNtcS6HLIxHe8pJQjzeAE= =kwO/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: Details
GUTEN TAG! Manuel Staub arbeitet nicht mehr für DER LEADER. Ihr Mail wurde umgeleitet an: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Für private Anliegen mailen Sie bitte auf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Besten Dank! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] more problems with rc1 + ADS: smbd sigsegv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, david williams wrote: > here's the tail end of the -d 10 log.host. It seems to not like the > encryption type. Which should I be using, and where should I change it? Are you using Hemdal? There were some reports of problems with Heimdal. > [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_verify_ticket(182) >ads_verify_ticket: krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type) > [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) >=== > [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) >INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 6310 (3.0.0rc1) >Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection > [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) >=== > [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1462) >PANIC: internal error > [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1469) >BACKTRACE: 15 stack frames: > #0 ../sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0xfc) [0x817f320] > #1 ../sbin/smbd [0x8170c4f] > #2 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 [0x420276f8] > #3 ../sbin/smbd(ads_verify_ticket+0x23e) [0x81c910a] This should happen obviously. Mind opening a bugzilla ticket for us? (https://bugzilla.samba.org/). Thanks. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/RlKsIR7qMdg1EfYRAoj1AKDHBxEWdkCI0WSFA1VX/ncKgDwC0wCZASwX 0+vYkjy+Cm2pxJe7jNBINWQ= =GU1r -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SID Calculation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Jarabe wrote: > If I am adding accounts manually to my ldap directory, and was curious > if there is any magic in the sambaSID attibutes? Can i assign then > incrementally? What abou the sambaPrimaryGroupSID what does that need > to be?? 3 things: * if you do this, set 'enable rid algorithm = no' in smb.conf However, things may break at this point. * also see the code in sam/idmap_ldap.c that handles RID allocation. * make sure all the users you care about are stored in your passdb backend (ldapsam) and that all group mappings are setup correctly. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/RlI1IR7qMdg1EfYRAsePAJ9KS+wSV9HK8xKala0NGe/r42vdcwCdHaA0 OozrNDCY2wCh1WYemtUbN64= =4oVX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] new e-mail address
Hello, I'm no longer working at Yale East Asian Studies. For EAS related information, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a few weeks I'll be beginning law school, so for the next several months will probably be lost in a black hole of stress and anxiety. If you're trying to send a note to me, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have a great day. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] more problems with rc1 + ADS: smbd sigsegv
here's the tail end of the -d 10 log.host. It seems to not like the encryption type. Which should I be using, and where should I change it? -dave [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 6310) [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(486) NT user token: (NULL) [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(505) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(218) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(577) wct=12 flg2=0xc801 [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(474) Doing spnego session setup [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(498) NativeOS=[Unix] NativeLanMan=[Samba] [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(383) Got OID 1 2 840 48018 1 2 2 [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(383) Got OID 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10 [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(386) Got secblob of size 1155 [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 10] passdb/secrets.c:secrets_named_mutex(697) secrets_named_mutex: got mutex for replay cache mutex [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_verify_ticket(175) ads_verify_ticket: enc type [16] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_verify_ticket(175) ads_verify_ticket: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt integrity check failed [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_verify_ticket(175) ads_verify_ticket: enc type [1] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 10] passdb/secrets.c:secrets_named_mutex_release(709) secrets_named_mutex: released mutex for replay cache mutex [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_verify_ticket(182) ads_verify_ticket: krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type) [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 6310 (3.0.0rc1) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1462) PANIC: internal error [2003/08/22 09:45:29, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1469) BACKTRACE: 15 stack frames: #0 ../sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0xfc) [0x817f320] #1 ../sbin/smbd [0x8170c4f] #2 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 [0x420276f8] #3 ../sbin/smbd(ads_verify_ticket+0x23e) [0x81c910a] #4 ../sbin/smbd [0x809dba5] #5 ../sbin/smbd [0x809e3c0] #6 ../sbin/smbd [0x809e6d5] #7 ../sbin/smbd(reply_sesssetup_and_X+0xa18) [0x809f1cc] #8 ../sbin/smbd [0x80b8579] #9 ../sbin/smbd [0x80b86d9] #10 ../sbin/smbd(process_smb+0x76) [0x80b889e] #11 ../sbin/smbd(smbd_process+0x198) [0x80b93ac] #12 ../sbin/smbd(main+0x416) [0x81d2a7a] #13 /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe4) [0x420156a4] #14 ../sbin/smbd(chroot+0x31) [0x8075cdd] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Wicked screensaver
--[This is an automatically generated email notification.]-- M A I L W A T C H V I R U S A L E R T ! You recently sent a message containing a known virus - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ED). The message was sent on 8/20/2003 7:15:39 PM. The subject of the message was: Re: Wicked screensaver The message was sent to the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] One or more of the recipients listed is a MailWatch customer. As a result, their copy of the message has been quarantined in a special confinement area at MailWatch and can only be released by their system administrator. This message is only meant to serve as a notification that your message was not delivered to all of the designated recipients. No action is required on your part. Please note, however, that the detection of a virus in a message you sent may be an indication that your computer system has already been compromised by a virus. Violated Policy:Virus - Inbound Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ED) found in attachment wicked_scr.scr. Remedial action (clean virus) requested. Message delivered. It is STRONGLY recommended that you check your entire system to determine the extent of this viral infection. For more information detailing how MailWatch can be used to protect your Internet email from unwanted solicitations, large or specific types of attachments, viral infections, and inappropriate content please visit our website or contact MailWatch at the number listed below. NOTE: This is an automated email notification. Please do NOT reply directly to this message! Message ID: 3232837393-2-229250001 ** MailWatch has scanned your e-mail message and determined it can not be delivered as originally sent. MailWatch can help you avoid these problems in the future by scanning your e-mail for viruses, Spam and objectionable content. Visit http://www.MailWatch.com to read about the benefits of MailWatch. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SID Calculation
If I am adding accounts manually to my ldap directory, and was curious if there is any magic in the sambaSID attibutes? Can i assign then incrementally? What abou the sambaPrimaryGroupSID what does that need to be?? Thanks, Spencer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: Thank you!
Wir haben Ihre e-mail erhalten. Vielen Dank. Ihr PixelPerfect Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] restriction on workgroup name length ?
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:49:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Windows 2000 Domain Controller serving the domain > EMEA.CORPDIR.NET > > smb.conf: > > workgroup = emea.corpdir.net > security = domain > > nmbd show the following errors: > > register_name_response: Answer name EMEA.CORPDIR.NE<00> differs from question name > EMEA.CORPDIR.NET<00>. > [2003/08/22 16:29:42, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:(73) > register_name_response: Answer name EMEA.CORPDIR.NE<1e> differs from question name > EMEA.CORPDIR.NET<1e>. > [2003/08/22 16:29:46, 2] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:(182) > > > and it's not possible to join the domain. This looks like an off by one bug in nmbd when dealing with names. I'm working on this code at the moment, I'll try and ensure this gets fixed for RC2. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] When will Samba-3 be released as stable ?
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:20:09AM +0200, Patrik Gustavsson PS Sweden Senior Technical Consultant wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a date when you could expect Samba-3 will be release as stable ? Well, the more you help us test it the sooner that will be :-). Seriously, we're down to weeks not months now... (IMHO) although Jerry has final authority on this. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba-delay (timeout??)
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 01:00:01AM +0200, Spaceman Spiff wrote: > I have an infrequent problem that sometimes when I'm accessing files on my > samba-server, it happens from time to time that the client computer appears > to hang for a limited time. Say 20-30 seconds. It doesn't matter if it is a > small file .TXT file or a large DivX movie. This has happened to me with > different versions of samba, and I first suspected that it might be > power-saving on the server. But the powersaving is turned off, and even if > it was the reason, it shouldn't take so long to power up a couple of disks. > I've also wondered if it might be some sort of DNS lookup that samba > attempts, but fails (because there is usually no connection available to a > DNS server.) That might explain why it takes so long before it continues. > Now I have removed all references to any DNS server, but this phenomena > still occurs. I guess having no DNS-server configured would make Samba/linux > to just skip any DNS lookup. Are there anybody out there who has > experienced something like this? Hints are welcome! :) It's almost certainly the client failing to respond to an oplock break message. Check your networking hardware (hubs/switches). Even quite well known equipment I've seen cause problems of this kind (netgear for example). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] listening on both 139 and 445
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > Is it possible to use the same configuration file to listen on both ports > 139 and 445? The only point of concern is the log file; if I have two > separate copies of smbd running, will they share the log file nicely or > should I tell each to write to separate logs? smbd in Samba 3 listens by default on 139 and 445. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/RjQtIR7qMdg1EfYRApFbAKDU5x1O1m3LCAs55QM7xuK6Sq+LawCg0ctP vJcW7rqaUkdD3xvf4p9hwjI= =gE+z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.0rc1 and 2 servers - PDC and homes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: > > If I logon to the domain from an XP machine and pull up the > > properties|security on one of my files, it shows the following in the > > "Group or user names" box: > >* Group icon for Everyone > >* User? icon with a SID listed > >* Group icon with the name of my group listed This should be fixed in the latest SAMBA_3_0 cvs. Please test. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/RjAZIR7qMdg1EfYRAs6pAJ9EA7TsQIhf/olTGi7PdpC7O7rmcQCg223Z nvr5ujSiqoUgKXoSJ5KHejQ= =MSsG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] restriction on workgroup name length ?
Hi, I have a Windows 2000 Domain Controller serving the domain EMEA.CORPDIR.NET smb.conf: workgroup = emea.corpdir.net security = domain nmbd show the following errors: register_name_response: Answer name EMEA.CORPDIR.NE<00> differs from question name EMEA.CORPDIR.NET<00>. [2003/08/22 16:29:42, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:(73) register_name_response: Answer name EMEA.CORPDIR.NE<1e> differs from question name EMEA.CORPDIR.NET<1e>. [2003/08/22 16:29:46, 2] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:(182) and it's not possible to join the domain. Is there any limit on the length of the workgroup name and if yes why doesn't samba take care about that ?? Cheers, Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba PDC + WinXP = problems fetching remote profiles
Hi! Thanks for answering, but unfortunately, this seems to be of no help. I already had [netlogon] service in my config (to avoid further confusion, i add my smb.conf at the end of this file), the only option i did not have was "inherit permissions = No", which does not seem to be useful for solving the problem (and did not help also). I have recently recogized that the problem of domain logons is at least closely connected to the problem of downloading "big" files (i.e. files larger than something about 4k or even 2k). The symptoms are the following: 1. There are two differently behaving groups of programs: network neighbourhood (or something like that) and windows explorer, FAR, (i suppose that Window Commander -- for those who don't know what FAR is) and so on. 2. Network Neighbourhood almost refuses to do anything on Samba shares -- it has long stall upon entering directories with names longer than 8 chars, and i don't remember it to be able to perform any file download/upload operations at all. 3. WinExplorer can browse shares freely, unless it encounters directory containing more than 25 entries (very strange limit -- but i checked, the limit is 25), where it stalls for 2 minutes. Also downloading files larger than something about 2 or 4 K always stalls for two minutes, and (under some unclear circumstances) sometimes fail completely. I seem to be really stuck with these errors, and i feel like i just "look in wrong direction", so any genious ideas will be gratefully accepted :). (Even any ideas that will help me to fix the thing :). On Thu, Aug 22, Dragan Krnic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Many problems result in this message. One is you need > a [profiles] share with a subdir named after each > user. That user needs to have full access to it, > for example 0700, belongs to user:users. You also need > a [netlogon] share even if you don't use it. > Sometimes an already existing profile is the problem. > Try removing it (save it first for reference) and > logging in afresh. # ### Here go the most important parts from my smb.conf [global] ; Network names and alike workgroup = COMPUTER_CLASS netbios name = kodomo server string = Kodomo Samba %v comment = BoiInformatic Computer Class ; Charset convertion dos charset = CP866 display charset = KOI8-R unix charset = KOI8-R ; Security security = user encrypt passwords = Yes min passwd length = 6 null passwords = Yes wide links = No passdb backend = smbpasswd log level = 1 log file = /var/log/samba/log.smbd.%m max log size = 1 ; Netlogon domain logons = Yes logon script = logon.bat logon path = \\kodomo\profiles\%U logon drive = H: logon home = \\kodomo\%u ; Browse master ; preferred master = No ; local master = Yes domain master = Yes os level = 64 [netlogon] path = /home/export/samba/netlogon write list = root read only = Yes ; browseable = No public = No veto oplock files = /NTUSER.DAT /ntuser.ini [profiles] path = /home/export/samba/profiles read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 ; browsable = No [homes] comment = Home directory for %u invalid users = root browseable = No read only = No # Dendik. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Basic setup but won't work
Hi there, On Friday 22 August 2003 15:14, bjorn_nesby wrote: > My setup is really simple. I've based the setup on the basic smb.conf that > is recommended for testing purposes (one shared folder with guest access > and read/write privileges), set the chmod to 777 for this folder and > created the respective users. > > It works fine in linux. I can access the folder as any user, create > folders, delete files etc. > > However, when I try to access the (linux) host using W2K, it says that the > network path could not be found (before I even have a chance to view the > shared files). Just follow this document step by step (worked well for me): http://samba.mirror.ac.uk/samba/ftp/docs/Samba24Hc13.pdf regards, Hansen -- Powered by SuSE 8.1pro - KDE 3.0.3 - KMail 1.4.3 At least, try asking smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html "A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head." - Anonymous -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] listening on both 139 and 445
Is it possible to use the same configuration file to listen on both ports 139 and 445? The only point of concern is the log file; if I have two separate copies of smbd running, will they share the log file nicely or should I tell each to write to separate logs? Regards, Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: samba Digest, Vol 8, Issue 31
Please check your server.. regards.. Sean Angley, P.Eng. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Host Server Support ISM Canada IBM Global Services One Research Drive Regina, CANADA S4S 7H1 PHONE: (306) 790-5199 FAX:(306) 790-5070 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21/08/2003 16:24 Please respond to samba To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:samba Digest, Vol 8, Issue 31 email-body is removed from here because it contains a virus. Security warning Exceed_Decompression_Layer in file email-body The file is deleted. IBM's antivirus detection system has identified a virus in an attachment to this e-mail. The attachment has been deleted. No further reporting or action is required on your part. THIS EMAIL IS NOW SAFE TO OPEN. Visit w3.ibm.com/virus for more information. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Basic setup but won't work
I have realised that using Samba is a complicated business and finding a simular scenario (and, hopefully, a solution) has proven to be more difficult than I would have thought. That is why I write to the samba list for help. I'm just kicking through leaves, while some of you guys *wrote* this piece of software!!! My setup is really simple. I've based the setup on the basic smb.conf that is recommended for testing purposes (one shared folder with guest access and read/write privileges), set the chmod to 777 for this folder and created the respective users. It works fine in linux. I can access the folder as any user, create folders, delete files etc. However, when I try to access the (linux) host using W2K, it says that the network path could not be found (before I even have a chance to view the shared files). This is my configuration: Samba is installed on RedHat 7.3 with official RedHat errata releases bringing my version of Samba up to "2.2.7-security-rollup-fix" (?). smb.conf is simular to the one found in "using Samba" (testing scenario) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [global] workgroup = METRAN [test] comment = For testing only, please path = /usr/local/samba/tmp read only = no guest ok = yes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On W2K, I obtain my IP and DNS automatically. Speaking of network drivers, I have the "client-for-microsoft-network" (it's a danish-language computer), "file-and-printer-sharing" as well as the TCP/IP protocol installed. There is no problem connecting to other windows machines. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba PDC + WinXP = problems fetching remote profiles
> But when i tried to log in with that very account > from another machine, i got Win hanging up for about > two minutes and blaming approximately the following > way: "Windows can't log you on with local profile, > using temporary profile. Changes done to this > profile will be lost after you log off" (phrase > `local profile` seemed strange to me, but Win really > does what it should do, except not down/up loading > the profiles). After the message disappears or i hit > OK, Win loggs in normally, downloads logon.bat and > seems to behave fine, but the profile is really > removed after log off. Many problems result in this message. One is you need a [profiles] share with a subdir named after each user. That user needs to have full access to it, for example 0700, belongs to user:users. You also need a [netlogon] share even if you don't use it. Try this scheme: [global] logon path = \\samba-srv\profiles\%U [netlogon] path = /some-existing-path/netlogon write list = ntadmin browseable = No [profiles] path = /some-existing-path/profiles valid users = %U read only = No browseable = No inherit permissions = No Sometimes an already existing profile is the problem. Try removing it (save it first for reference) and logging in afresh. Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Details
--[This is an automatically generated email notification.]-- M A I L W A T C H V I R U S A L E R T ! You recently sent a message containing a known virus - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message was sent on 8/20/2003 5:32:49 PM. The subject of the message was: Re: Details The message was sent to the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] One or more of the recipients listed is a MailWatch customer. As a result, their copy of the message has been quarantined in a special confinement area at MailWatch and can only be released by their system administrator. This message is only meant to serve as a notification that your message was not delivered to all of the designated recipients. No action is required on your part. Please note, however, that the detection of a virus in a message you sent may be an indication that your computer system has already been compromised by a virus. Violated Policy:Virus - Inbound Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] found in attachment wicked_scr.scr. Remedial action (clean virus) requested. Message delivered. It is STRONGLY recommended that you check your entire system to determine the extent of this viral infection. For more information detailing how MailWatch can be used to protect your Internet email from unwanted solicitations, large or specific types of attachments, viral infections, and inappropriate content please visit our website or contact MailWatch at the number listed below. NOTE: This is an automated email notification. Please do NOT reply directly to this message! Message ID: 32327756950008-2-205250001 ** MailWatch has scanned your e-mail message and determined it can not be delivered as originally sent. MailWatch can help you avoid these problems in the future by scanning your e-mail for viruses, Spam and objectionable content. Visit http://www.MailWatch.com to read about the benefits of MailWatch. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 3.0 with LDAP backend using SSL/TLS and OpenLDAP 2.1.22-1
Preamble: I was reading in the OpenLDAP faq-o-matic that as of 2.1, LDAP clients (or specifically the LDAP client libraries) need to know how to find the certificate when connecting via SSL or TLS. As of 3.0, I've been getting a Samba internal error when setting ldap ssl = start tls in the smb.conf file. testparm checks out ok (My samba server is configured as a Role_Domain_PDC server). This error occurs when using smbclient to connect to samba on the same machine or when attempting to browse the server using a WinXP Pro SP1 client. Setting ldap ssl = no eliminates the error and the ldap backend operates correctly. The error occurs on samba 3.0beta2 and samba3.0rc1. I do recall that I used to have a secure connection to the ldap backend working with samba v2.... and OpenLDAP 2.0.x however I don't want to downgrade as I like the new features of 3.0. I was basically wondering whether there is a configuration option that I am missing? (possibly to do with pointing Samba at the client SSL certificate to use when connecting via TLS.) Interestingly, I do have both libgnutls5 (0.8.8-2) and libgnutls7 (0.8.9-2) installed as various software I have depends on one or the other of these libraries. Samba appears to be linked to libgnutls5. Other pertinent version info: OS: Debian testing/unstable kernel 2.4.20-9, libldap2 2.1.22-1 Snippet of the log.smbd file follows: [2003/08/22 12:37:33, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 3241 (3.0.0rc1-0 for Debian) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2003/08/22 12:37:33, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === [2003/08/22 12:37:33, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1452) smb_panic(): calling panic action [/usr/share/samba/panic-action 3241] /usr/share/samba/panic-action: line 48: mail: command not found [2003/08/22 12:37:33, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1460) smb_panic(): action returned status 127 [2003/08/22 12:37:33, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1462) PANIC: internal error [2003/08/22 12:37:33, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1469) BACKTRACE: 21 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0xc9) [0x81816b5] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8172de2] #2 /lib/libc.so.6 [0x401d0c38] #3 /usr/lib/libldap.so.2(gnutls_SSL_get_certificate+0x39) [0x400f9c4e] #4 /usr/lib/libldap.so.2(ldap_pvt_tls_get_my_dn+0x1e) [0x400f7daf] #5 /usr/lib/libldap.so.2(ldap_int_tls_start+0x116) [0x400f8bce] #6 /usr/lib/libldap.so.2(ldap_start_tls_s+0xb2) [0x400f8f20] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81d30f1] #8 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81d34c5] #9 /usr/sbin/smbd(smbldap_retry_open+0x31) [0x81d3715] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd(smbldap_search+0x4e) [0x81d387a] #11 /usr/sbin/smbd(smbldap_search_suffix+0x57) [0x81d3ed7] #12 /usr/sbin/smbd(smbldap_search_domain_info+0x8c) [0x81d4784] #13 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x816726f] #14 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x815fa4e] #15 /usr/sbin/smbd(make_pdb_context_list+0xc8) [0x815ff2c] #16 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81601f3] #17 /usr/sbin/smbd(initialize_password_db+0xe) [0x816057a] #18 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x32f) [0x81d5c8b] #19 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xac) [0x401bed04] #20 /usr/sbin/smbd(chroot+0x31) [0x80768e1] Any help or suggestions greatly appreciated, Rob. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: winbindd problem with 3.0.0rc1
Greetings ... i've been trying to get samba 3 to join my AD domain, and have gotten stuck. So have I ... when I wbinfo -t it returns "Could not check secret" Had a similar problem ... but mine was complaining that it could not use rpc for the check ... I download RawHides src.rpm and updated, and now I am able do wbinfo -t. Are you able to run wbinfo -m and wbinfo -u? Mailed Lee -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NT-Domain in smbmount
Hallo, is there an option in smbmount, where I can tell the NT-Server, which is the authorization domain ? In the Windows-world, this is written as 'domain\username' in the connection dialog. I'm using smbmount Version 2.2.7a under LINUX ( SUSE 8.2) Thanks, so long Thomas (MOHp) -- Thomas Hohmann DWD, Met. Obs. Hohenpeissenberg email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEU *** tel.: 08805-954-203 *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: winbind tests ...
Installed Samba 3.0.0rc1, and seem to be having problems with winbind. First question, shouldn't "wbinfo -t" return success? I have "wbinfo I grab the RawHide src and updated to 3rc1 and wbinfo -t now works, seems like a problem with mkrpm in 3rc1. I will look further once I have my system working. This also fixed wbinfo -a test2%test2 plaintext password authentication succeeded challenge/response password authentication succeeded Thrid, should winbind return uid numers for nss when configured in /etc/nsswitch.conf by adding winbind to passwd? Does anybody have any hints on any of these? I have found that I have to do a [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -n test1 S-1-5-21-2875628134-430090060-3946654109-1114 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -S test1 Could not convert sid test1 to uid [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -S S-1-5-21-2875628134-430090060-3946654109-1114 1 Before I am able to have nss use the uid numbers for the fs, but I am not able to do a chown test1 ./testdir, I still get chown: `test1': invalid user Do I need to configure pma before I am able to do this? Thanks Mailed Lee P.S. Please can any give me a hand with this. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Setting up printer driver on Windows 2000 machines via samba
Hi All, I have read all docs, Faq and whatever I could get my hands on, but have been unable to get any success on this. We have a hetrogenous netwok and are using smb2.2.3a on Red Hat linux 8. We have a "HP LaserJet 2200 Series PCL 6" printer. When we connect to the printer directly, we can use all features available with it. But whenever, we are installing the printer on th client via SAMBA server, we do not get all fetures available and this message is displayed. If someone has already found a solution to this problem, can he/she please help me solve this problem. Should I go about creating 4 differnet aliases for the printer, with each one for say windows 9x, XP, 2000 servers etc. Also I have not been able to upload the printer drivers through the NT workstation, as given in the samba docs. TIA, Alok Bhatt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NAV detected a virus in a document you authored.
Please contact your system administrator. The scanned document was QUARANTINED. Virus Information: The attachment your_document.pif contained the virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and could NOT be repaired. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Znalezniono wirusa w wyslanej przez Ciebie wiadomosci/Virusfound in message from you!
Nasz system antywirusowy odnalazł następujące wirusy: Our antivirus system found following viruses: I-Worm.Sobig.f.txt I-Worm.Sobig.f w Twoim liście elektronicznym wysłanym do: in your email sent to: -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Przesyłanie listu zostało wstrzymane! Delivery of the email was stopped! Oto nagłówki z Twojej wiadomości: Here are headers from your email: - BEGIN HEADERS - >From <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from SEKRABP (kuria.kuria.lublin.pl [212.182.109.33]) by dark.pcgames.pl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h7M96Q9W013715 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:06:34 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Thank you! Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:06:30 +0200 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_NextPart_000_05B062BD" -- END HEADERS -- Pozdrawiam/Bye JMG Virus Protection System 2001, 2003, 2003 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba-delay (timeout??)
I have an infrequent problem that sometimes when I'm accessing files on my samba-server, it happens from time to time that the client computer appears to hang for a limited time. Say 20-30 seconds. It doesn't matter if it is a small file .TXT file or a large DivX movie. This has happened to me with different versions of samba, and I first suspected that it might be power-saving on the server. But the powersaving is turned off, and even if it was the reason, it shouldn't take so long to power up a couple of disks. I've also wondered if it might be some sort of DNS lookup that samba attempts, but fails (because there is usually no connection available to a DNS server.) That might explain why it takes so long before it continues. Now I have removed all references to any DNS server, but this phenomena still occurs. I guess having no DNS-server configured would make Samba/linux to just skip any DNS lookup. Are there anybody out there who has experienced something like this? Hints are welcome! :) -Spaceman Spiff -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: Re: That movie
An e-mail you sent to the following recipients was infected with a virus and was not delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MessageID: T6434583d4c0a08027417c Subject: Re: That movie Attachment: SMTP Messages: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. SMTP Messages: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. SMTP Messages: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. Recognise Executables: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Threat: 'W32/Sobig-F' detected by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Restricted File Types by extension: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'document_9446.pif'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Executables by byte pattern: 'ItemLength.GE.0'. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. Please determine and clean the source of the virus before resending an attachment. (smpnote3) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] When will Samba-3 be released as stable ?
Hi, Is there a date when you could expect Samba-3 will be release as stable ? /Patrik -- "In a world without fences who needs Gates" Patrik Gustavsson, Senior Technical Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +46 60 671540 http://glen.swedenMobile: +46 70 3551040 SUN MICROSYSTEMS Fax: +46 60 671550 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] authenticating users against AD
I checked the docs I could find, and this list's archives, but I wasn't able to find an answer to this question. I want to join Linux workstations to my AD domain and have users logging on be authenticated against the AD domain as opposed to NIS. I don't see that Samba 3.0 will do this. Is that correct? If Samba 3.0 will enable Linux users to authenticate against AD, how does a Linux workstation get the user's UID, GID, and Unix home directory information? solutions such as the PADL software extend the AD scheme to accomodate these additions, bu I don't see that Samba 3.0 will do that. or, does AD integration in Samba 3.0 mean something else? ---Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] File blocked - ScanMail for Lotus Notes --> Re: That movieScanMail has detected a virus!
ScanMail has removed an attachment during a real-time scan of the email traffic. Date: 2003-08-21 07:20:36 PM Subject: Re: That movie ScanMail has detected a virus! Virus: Blocked; File: movie0045.pif From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CN=Lei Chun Chang/O=SiS Action: Blocked; Scanned by ScanMail for Lotus Notes 2.5 with scanengine 6.150-1001 and patternfile lpt$vpn.618 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
