Re: [Samba] XP - "The Procedure Number is Out of Range"
Jerry; I've alway's used the "Unofficial Samba HOWTO" by David Lechnyr, off the samba.org website. It's a brilliant document. but as it happens, Section 5.3.3 describes the changes to the XP Registry and it seems to be missing the entries that have caused my problem. In the response from Jose Eloy da Costa Junior came the clue. He included "sealsecurechannel"=dword:0001 -- Faça as seguintes alterações no registro do windows: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] "DisablePasswordChange"=dword: "maximumpasswordage"=dword:001e "requiresignorseal"=dword: "requirestrongkey"=dword: "sealsecurechannel"=dword:0001 "signsecurechannel"=dword:0001 "Update"="no" Att. José Eloy Jr. It seems this has solved the problem. Thanks to Jose, and to you too Jerry, for your response. Cheers; E! - Eric Wilson "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." -Johann von Goethe, German Playwright 1749-1832 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Eric Wilson wrote: > >> Hi All; >> >> I too have this problem. I've seen may requests for assistance on this >> problem, but I never see any response or solution. >> >> In my case it's a very simple environment Samba v 3.0 RC1 & RHv9.0, PCs >> are all XP PRO. >> >> If this a documented problem can someone point us to the documentation >> that solves this problem? If I can provide more detail please let me >> know, I'd be happy to provide logs or some testing. > > I've tried to reproduce this and cannot. See > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309 > > Can you send me level 10 debug logs off list and I'll > work on it some more. I've reopened the bug report. > > > > > cheers, jerry > -- > Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com > SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org > GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc > "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." > --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ > > iD8DBQE/T3vxIR7qMdg1EfYRAgWAAKCW+/QWTe0GvpJ8LXByyr3EKRABgQCeIOhP > 3TwbmRlJgw59w6qgj4YZ+dc= > =I4iQ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Undelivered mail
The following error(s) occurred while attempting to send this message. A list of the affected recipients is included below. --> Error description: Error-For: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error-Code: 3 Error-Text: This userid is not a valid user on our system Error-End: Error reported --- Rejected Message --- HELO MCGILL1 MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DATA Received: from trickle.cc.mcgill.ca [132.206.27.51] by MUSICA.MCGILL.CA (IBM VM X-Comment: MUSICA.MCGILL.CA: Mail was sent by trickle.cc.mcgill.ca Received: from prion.mcgill.ca (prion.McGill.CA [132.206.27.58]) by trickle.cc.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7UMGDSF002998 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:16:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MWESA (adsl-68-20-17-206.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.20.17.206]) by prion.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7UMFoW0022363 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:15:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Details Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:21:04 --0500 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_NextPart_000_0638BE5B" This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_0638BE5B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -- Virus Warning Message (on prion) Found virus WORM_SOBIG.F in file your_details.pif The uncleanable file is deleted. No action is required on your part. McGill NCS has removed the virus from your e - --_NextPart_000_0638BE5B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_0638BE5B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -- Virus Warning Message (on prion) your_details.pif is removed from here because it contains a virus. - --_NextPart_000_0638BE5B-- . QUIT -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Message Blocked: Re: Thank you!
A message with the subject line: Re: Thank you! from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> included one or more attachments that may be harmful to the recipient's computer. The message was blocked and not delivered. Attachments to this message included: your_document.pif Mi8 Corporation Your enterprise email provider -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba PDC + WinXP = problems fetching remote profiles
Hi. The situation turned out even more mysterious i seemed before. I got two new XP boxes, obviously those are XP/pro without SP1 (did not check that, but it required much more updates than other XP boxes, and ver tells it's the same XP/2002/2600). So i tried out carefully step-by-step installation of those machines. I stopped when they were in domain mode, before any RequireSignOrSeal/WebClient/ EAP patches and they worked fine, a few seconds per log in, no trouble with downloading/uploading, just perfect!!! So i reinstalled XP on one of other 20 machines. And nothing changed -- files still wont download even before entering domain mode. More fun: there are several samba servers in other networks, and all (now 22) machines can access them without any problems. I did try to port their smb.conf to my server, but they have samba 2.2 and i did not decide yet to make that big retract. Now i decided to run diff on XP distribs and find out what the difference is in to see if i can fix it. Will report after i complete. Anyway, it's at least very strange behaviour!! Dendik. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba PDC + WinXP = problems fetching remote profiles
> More than one week of fighting -- and still no
> result. I'm stuck at the very same point. Right
> now i had to make the system work just any way
> -- at least like file server for window$ clients.
> But the problem with file downloading still
> persists. And i really have no idea of what i do
> wrong.
You still have the problem! So sorry.
I installed an XP yesterday. All I had to do was set
network properties and register the SignOrSeal
patch (WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg). I left the default
IEEE 802.1X EAP setting ("Smartcard or other...") and
didn't disable the Web client service either, just
to see what kind of problems other people have.
Well, I had no problem whatsoever. I can login in
and out in a couple of seconds. I can transfer the
Win2K-SP4 (137 MB) in both directions under 15 sec.
I don't know what your problem is but in your shoes
I would try from scratch, with a very uncomplicated
setup - just the server and a freshly installed client
connected via a crossed cable and build from there.
Chances are that something completely different is
your problem, but you need to find it out slowly
and systematically.
>>> Sounds like symptoms of activated Web Client
>>> service.
>> Maybe the point is about EAP -- i did not quite
> Still no help. I even tried to select each prorocol,
> deselect each of their checkboxes and then deselect
> IEEE 802.1x, as someone reported this may help -- no
> result.
I wonder what other problem in client network
configuration can be masked by switching EAP and
Web client off. I've seen the problem only on an
XP client, a laptop. It wasn't severe. Opening a
share or a shared subdirectory would stall for several
seconds although it takes no time on other clients.
When I disabled Web client and EAP those symptoms
were gone.
With my new XP box I also tried and disabled both
EAP and Web client. No difference. Same login and
transfer speed.
EAP and Web client obviously do not need to be a
problem on an otherwise correctly set up server
and clients communicating through decent wires and
switches.
I'm afraid no one can help you but you yourself.
Go slowly from simple to more complex. Be sure what
works and you'll find out what the problem was.
Perhaps you should first test how fast ftp client
works.
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Automated reply from howardemail@www.howardsmee.co.uk
Please phone regarding this enquiry on 01245 401178 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Execute windows programs stored on a share - Windows XP
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 05:52:34PM +0200, Michael Rocholl wrote: > Whenever I try to start an EXE stored on a SAMBA share on a Windows XP I > encounter: > > 'Windows cannot access the specified path, directory or file - You may > not have the appropriate permissions to access the item' > > Running pure DOS programs from the share works fine.For all other > actions (copy, delete etc.) I have full control on this share.Also the > securite option of the respective EXE-file show all permissions > enabled.SAMBA logging (even with high log level) gave me no hint (but I > have to admit that I am an SMB newbie). > > My environment: > . SUSE Linux 8.2 Professional Edition > . SAMBA 2.2.7a-58-i586 > . Windows XP Professional SP1 > . SMB.CONF : see attached Can you please try the rpms from samba.org, not the SuSE ones. I believe the SuSE Samba rpms had a bug w.r.t. this problem. Hopefully someone from SuSE will comment. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] W2k, SP4 and Domain logon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. Yesterday I had the funny idea of upgrading all my Windows 2000 Professional worksations (20 W2k boxes more or less) to SP4. I run Samba 2.2.8a on a glorious RedHat 6.2, and after the endless download-and-reboot I found with no W2K client able to logging in. I skimmed the mail archives, tried a bunch of suggestion from really a lot of postings (a big thank to all who contributed, I should have penciled down a list...) and here I am with half a solution. SERVER SIDE: check your smb.conf, in particular the [profiles] section. Mine says: [profiles] path = /home/profile read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 force directory mode = 0700 inherit permissions = yes nt acl support = yes map system = yes map hidden = yes browseable = no comment = User profile directory on %L (Samba %v PDC) profile acls = yes Note that my server is acting as a PDC: [global] add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g workstations -s /bin/false -M %u create mask = 0664 dead time = 0 debug level = 3 default case = lower dfree command = /sbin/diskfree directory mask = 0770 dns proxy = no domain logons = yes domain master = yes dos filetimes = yes encrypt passwords = yes hide dot files = yes hosts allow = 192.168.1. 127. interfaces = 192.168.1.250/255.255.255.0 load printers = no local master = yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 2 logon drive = G: logon home = \\%L\%u logon path = \\%L\profiles\%u logon script = logon.bat max log size = 50 name resolve order = host wins bcast netbios name = MALAUSSENE os level = 64 passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updat ed*successfully* passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u password level = 8 preferred master = yes printcap name = /etc/printcap security = user server string = UAGB Primary Domain Controller (Samba %v PDC) socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd time server = yes unix password sync = yes username level = 8 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers wins support = yes workgroup = UAGB null passwords = no CLIENT SIDE: Here comes the workload... one day ot the other I will switch to LTSP terminals... It seems that with SP4 and the so-called "fix" for the blaster worm the way in which a W2K client works changed abruptly. Anyway, roll up your sleeves and login as Administrator Go to System/Network Identification and place the machine into a WORKGROUP, leaving the domain. Don't waste your time rebooting. Go to Control Panel/Network and Dial-up Connections, pick your LAN connection (should be called "Local Area Connection") and go to Properties of the TCP/IP protocol. Set Preferred DNS: 192.168.1.250 (i.e. the samba server IP, it acts also as a caching DNS) Click on "Advanced", go to DNS tab and set Append primary and connection specific DNS suffixes Append parent suffixes of the primary DNS suffix other checkboxes/radiobuttons should be unchecked. Go to WINS tab. Set the WINS server IP to the IP of the samba server. DISABLE "Enable LMHOSTS lookup" ENABLE "Enable NEtBIOS over TCP/IP" I didn't touch the "Options" tab. No IPSEC, No filtering. Close everything, go back to System/Network Identification Make sure that, clicking on "More", the domain where your boxes are is specified. I put in "dipbsf.uninsubria.it", which is mine. UNCHECK the "Change primary DNS suffix when domain membership changes" checkbox. Now click the "Domain" radio button, and rejoin the domain. Close everything, and this time reboot. I advise, after the reboot, to log in as Administrator again, and to launch (Window/R, or Start/Run) LUSRMGR.MSC and to remove "Domain Users" from the "Users" group, and adding it instead to the "Power Users" group. This way my poor W2k boxes are still able to join the domain and next Monday users will be able to login. Still, the [netlogon] share is unaccessible, and logon script processing still doesn't work. My logon script does only a net time \\malaussene /set /yes, and mounts six or seven shares. At present I copied it in the most used share, and I will say to my users to manually mount this and launch MOUNT.BAT. Any further suggestion will be welcome! BTW: I read about an almost-up-to-date HOWTO that Scott Phelps promised to write about PDC, LDAP and so on... any news? Thanks to all! - -- "I changed my headlights the other day. I put in strobe lights instead! Now when I drive at night, it looks like everyone else is standing still ..." -- Steven Wright - --- Damiano G. Preatoni, PhD Unità di Analisi e Gestione delle Biocenosi
[Samba] test
We have just received mail claiming to be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] via a mail server calling itself O52WRITER ([212.127.12.98]). This is a one-time test to verify that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not a fictitious address. That you received this, proves all is well and no response is needed. Please ignore and delete. tracking: ako?ela+we?*a57xnpa?uhn0a+cilb9ydo?-acru?ya+vxcja5hz2m -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] MIMEDefang Notification
An e-mail you sent with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was modified by our mail scanning software. The recipients were: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here are the details of the modification: Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] found in mail -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Content violation
The email gateway at USAFA AF MIL found a content violation in this email message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Approved Matching Subject: re: approved -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] MIMEDefang Notification
An e-mail you sent with message-id NOQUEUE was modified by our mail scanning software. The recipients were: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here are the details of the modification: Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] found in mail -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Execute windows programs stored on a share - Windows XP
Whenever I try to start an EXE stored on a SAMBA share on a Windows XP I encounter: 'Windows cannot access the specified path, directory or file - You may not have the appropriate permissions to access the item' Running pure DOS programs from the share works fine.For all other actions (copy, delete etc.) I have full control on this share.Also the securite option of the respective EXE-file show all permissions enabled.SAMBA logging (even with high log level) gave me no hint (but I have to admit that I am an SMB newbie). My environment: . SUSE Linux 8.2 Professional Edition . SAMBA 2.2.7a-58-i586 . Windows XP Professional SP1 . SMB.CONF : see attached Many thanks MIchael Rocholl SMB.CONF [global] workgroup = ROCHOLL netbios name = ROCKIT1 security = user encrypt passwords = yes password level = 0 guest ok = no guest account = nobody os level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/%m log level = 2 max log size = 5000 syslog = 1 locking = yes case sensitive = no preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes [Shared] comment = Shared on DATA path = /data/Shared browseable = yes read only = no inherit permissions = yes valid users = @rocholl write list = @rocholl -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Domain Local Groups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Tom Dickson wrote: > If I have an NT Domain (MAIN) that has a one way trust to another domain > (SUB), and I define domain local groups on the domain SUB with members from > MAIN, can Samba 3.0 be made to see those groups? (Everything is NT only) > > Or does it only work with 2000 AD Native mode? domain local groups in NT4 (and mixed mode AD domains) are only available to DC's. So samba would never see these groups. However, domain local groups are available to domain members in a native mode AD domain so samba does see these. I'm not sure you example will work anyways. What you are descibing sounds more like universal groups in AD. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/UKtOIR7qMdg1EfYRAt1aAJ9uGiTEJRbYtNGCnSBMe77tT7U+7QCdGkj+ FxiAThTuMhV4MK5U0rTQzHM= =M9yu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Use this patch immediately !
Dear friend , use this Internet Explorer patch now! There are dangerous virus in the Internet now! More than 500.000 already infected! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Using samba without NetBIOS
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 03:34, Peter Edstrom wrote: > > No. Samba can run only SMB over TCP/IP. Samba can run SMB with, or without > > NetBIOS. NetBIOS over TCP/IP uses port 139, without NetBIOS port 445 is > > used. > > > > Samba does NOT allow SMB over IPX. > > I see. Do I have to configure Samba to use port 445, ie. explicitly tell > it not to use NetBIOS? I can't connect to any of the Windows computers now > when NetBIOS is disabled (I could before). With Samba 2.2, set the port to 445 (it's a command line option) and don't run nmbd. You cannot disable netbios compleatly, if you are running as a domain member, as it will still use netbios in part of it's communication with the DC. With Samba 3.0, there is a smb.conf option, which also makes avoid netbios in the client and server ends. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] confirmed problem with photoshop 7.0 and samba 2.2.x
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:16:14PM +1000, ipguy wrote: > hi all > > you may remember my earlier post regarding a photoshop problem with > samba shares, well, I can now confirm that the problem is real. > > i have two version of PS installed on my workstation, 6.0 & 7.0 > > when trying to "save-as" from 6.0, no problems. > > when trying to "save-as" from 7.0, problem, i'm getting a "disk full" error. > > when i check the logs, at log level 2, i don't see anything funny (ill > increase the log level to 5 or 10 and see what I kind find) Log level 10 would be very useful - especially if you can pinpoint the response that gives the "disk full" problem. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Saludos desde Madrid
Hola amig@: Me llamo Rufino. Te escribo desde Madrid, España y formo parte de un equipo del Movimiento Humanista. Hoy son ya millones de personas las que experimentan cómo la sociedad en que vivimos se deshumaniza día a día. El ser humano ha perdido todo valor, el mundo se mueve en torno al dinero y en base al egoísmo, mientras las personas van quedando cada vez más desamparadas. De este modo, mientras cada uno está preocupado de sus propios problemas, todos vivimos cada vez peor. Sin embargo los humanistas sabemos que el absurdo de la globalización dirigida, pensada sólo en términos económicos por los grandes bancos y multinacionales, no va a triunfar. Existe otro proceso de mundialización donde el ser humano ha crecido internamente y se encamina a la formación de una Nación Humana Universal. Hay una nueva sensibilidad en el ser humano que experimenta que cualquier cosa que pase en cualquier punto del planeta termina por afectarle a uno mismo. Este es un proceso histórico irreversible y así lo sienten ya en su corazón millones de personas. Todo ser humano tiene derecho a una vida digna por el simple hecho de haber nacido. Y en el interior de todo ser humano hay algo muy grande que está buscando expresarse en el mundo. Nuestro proyecto consiste en conectar y organizar a esos millones de personas de sensibilidad humanista. Si estás interesad@ en saber más de nuestra propuesta, por favor sigue estos pasos: 1- Abre un mensaje nuevo 2- Escribe en el asunto la palabra SI 3- Envíalo a la dirección: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Esperamos tu mensaje. Un saludo afectuoso. Rufino == Este mensaje se envía una única vez, por tanto no es necesario que te des de baja de ninguna lista. Si su contenido no es de tu interés, disculpanos. No obstante, si conoces a otras personas a quienes pueda interesar nuestra propuesta, te pedimos que les reenvies este mensaje. Gracias de antemano. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba2.2.8a upgrade
Hello, I need some help...I upgraded SAMBA on my Solaris 8 Server (sparc) from version 2.2.2 to 2.2.8a ( samba-2.2.8a-sol8-sparc-local ), and now it's giving me an error when I try to open SWAT. I get the following error: ld.so.1: swat: fatal: libpopt.so.0: open failed: No such file or directory Please Help !! Zak IT Systems Engineer CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this ELECTRONIC MAIL transmission is confidential. It may also be privileged work product or proprietary information. This information is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution [other than to the addressee(s)], copying or taking of any action because of this information is strictly prohibited. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] MIMEDefang Notification
An e-mail you sent with message-id NOQUEUE was modified by our mail scanning software. The recipients were: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here are the details of the modification: Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] found in mail -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
