[Samba] size of the samba server
Hi, I plan to install a samba the 3 when it'll be out with ldap I need a bit of advice for the size of my server for 200 hundred people I plan to have two server One for ldap +oracle ( oracle won't but used intensively) one for samba the ldap server processor Intel Xeon 2 Ghz / 512 Ko cache 2Go ram scsi disk raid 1 (36 G0) the samba pdc server Bi-processor Intel Xeon 2 Ghz / 512 Ko cache 2Go ram scsi dik k raid 1 (36 G0) thank for your answer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] rc3 net groupmap add fails
Relevant part of "net3 groupmap list" is System Operators (S-1-5-21-1617713866-2789119093-1479812082-1007) -> sys In howto there is the following example net groupmap modify ntgroup="System Operators" unixgroup=sys net groupmap modify ntgroup="Power Users" unixgroup=sys You can add System Operators but trying to add Power Users fails. If you do it in reverse adding Poer Users works. net groupmap add ntgroup="Power Users" unixgroup=sys No rid or sid specified, choosing algorithmic mapping [2003/09/09 18:22:39, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_add_group_mapping_entry(1911) Group 3 already exists in LDAP adding entry for group Power Users failed! Is the example wrong? Can multiple ntgroups map to a single unix group? Also net groupmap add ntgroup="Users" unixgroup=users fails other unixgroups work is users special users is a group in ldap ldapsearch -LL -H ldap://localhost -b"dc=hattaways,dc=com" -x "(cn=users)" version: 1 dn: cn=users,ou=Group,dc=hattaways,dc=com objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: users gidNumber: 10501 memberUid: godfrey Otherwise rc3 appears to work Many Thanks Godfrey -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba share winXP
When sharing a fat32 partition on a Knoppix setup, I have the problem, that my whole system gets unstable, when copying or reading from the samba share. Has anyone got an idea what this could mean? I have Samaba 3.0 installed. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] logon problems, with ldap & samba 3.0
Deja.com with samba groups looks like they don't take me serious...very confusing, then i post my message here hope that someone here can help me. I know that my mail is very long and also my log file but sometime it's necessary voor a good problem solving. I am playing for a few weeks now with linux as a complete newbie (redhat 9.0) with Ldap and Samba 3.0rc1. Problem, i have joined the windows workstation (BNC5) at the domain "xenon-systems.lan" with samba, that goes Oke. But when i want to logon with a user "pietjepuk" in my ldap database at the domain, windows 2000 Pro said; "The system could nog log you in". I have logged, samba at level 10, so sorry for the huge log file i send with this message, still hope you want to take a look at this file. For sure i send my smb.conf, and two entry's of my ldap database, the one for user "Pietjepuk" and the machine account "BNC5". Maybe i have made some stupid configuration mistakes here, but i am stucked for a moment with this problem, i don't know where to look now. If you need more configuration info to analyze this problem (like the samba tools configuration, i have used) mail me. My smb.conf file; SMB.CONF [global] workgroup = xenon-systems netbios name = janotto12 server string = LDAP-Samba Server guest account = nobody log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user log level = 10101010101010101010 hosts allow = 192.168.1.15 admin users = root Administrator encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = yes os level = 64 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes name resolve order = host lmhosts wins bcast ldap server = localhost ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=xenon-systems,dc=lan ldap ssl = off passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://JanOtto:389 ldap delete dn = no ldap suffix = dc=xenon-systems,dc=lan ldap group suffix = ou=Group ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap machine suffix = ou=machine ldap passwd sync = no ldap trust ids = no dns proxy = no [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon guest ok = yes read only = yes write list = ntadmin [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 My ldap database enty's # pietjepuk, People, xenon-systems, lan dn: uid=pietjepuk,ou=People,dc=xenon-systems,dc=lan cn: pietjepuk sn: pietjepuk uid: pietjepuk uidNumber: 1002 gidNumber: 100 homeDirectory: /home//pietjepuk loginShell: /bin/bash description: System User objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: sambaSAMAccount objectClass: organizationalPerson objectClass: top objectClass: shadowAccount sambaPwdLastSet: 1061988901 sambaLogonTime: 0 sambaLogoffTime: 2147483647 sambaKickoffTime: 2147483647 sambaPwdCanChange: 1061988901 sambaPwdMustChange: 1063803301 displayName: System User sambaAcctFlags: [U ] sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3925117408-4120281639-4000504131-3004 sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-3925117408-4120281639-4000504131-1201 sambaHomeDrive: D: sambaHomePath: \\PDC-SRV\homes sambaProfilePath: \\PDC-SRV\profiles\pietjepuk sambaLogonScript: pietjepuk.cmd sambaLMPassword: A0BEBA4E6AF90B6B4D0E222EE9C73E37 sambaNTPassword: E44C940239C9060A669CE8741D69CF72 gecos: pietjepuk userPassword:: e2NyeXB0fVVwUnpRc0RpQkkzbmM= shadowLastChange: 12303 # BNC5$, machine, xenon-systems, lan dn: uid=BNC5$,ou=machine,dc=xenon-systems,dc=lan objectClass: top objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: sambaSamAccount cn: BNC5$ uid: BNC5$ uidNumber: 1005 gidNumber: 553 homeDirectory: /dev/null loginShell: /bin/false description: Computer sambaSID: S-1-5-21-2952444217-1520760294-1954335297-3010 sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-2952444217-1520760294-1954335297-2107 displayName: BNC5$ sambaAcctFlags: [W ] sambaPwdCanChange: 1062411688 sambaPwdMustChange: 1064226088 sambaLMPassword: 17407D39E46F4EAA8E8E51AC5A81EE4A sambaNTPassword: 174FD546AC808130341FACD614F04BE7 sambaPwdLastSet: 1062411688 And the huge logfilesorry 2003/09/08 10:03:37, 5] passdb/secrets.c:secrets_fetch_trusted_domain_password(299) secrets_fetch failed! [2003/09/08 10:03:37, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386) pop_sec_ctx (99, 99) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/09/08 10:03:37, 10] lib/gencache.c:gencache_get(285) Cache entry with key = TDOM/XENON-SYSTEMS couldn't be found [2003/09/08 10:03:37, 5] libsmb/trustdom_cache.c:trustdom_cache_fetch(172) no entry for trusted domain XENON-SYSTEMS found. [2003/09/08 10:03:37, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(132) attempting to make a user_info for pietjepuk (pietjepuk) [2003/09/08 10:03:37, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(142) making strings for pietjepuk's user_info struct [2003/09/08 10:03:37, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(184) making blobs for pietjepuk's user_
[Samba] Member of DOM1, but user authentication on DOM2?
Using version 2.2.8a. My server must be a member of MY_RESOURCES, but user authentication must be done on MY_USERS_DOM. How can I accomplish this? smbpasswd -j MY_USERS_DOM? [global] workgroup = MY_RESOURCES? netbios name = MY_SERVER? security = DOMAIN? password server = PDC_MY_USERS_DOM, BDC_MY_USERS_DOM? Thanks, Simon. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Antigen found VIRUS= Sobig.F@m (Norman) worm
Antigen for Exchange found application.pif infected with VIRUS= [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Norman) worm. The message is currently Purged. The message, "Re: Wicked screensaver", was sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at Network Engines/NEI/NEIMAIL5. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Undeliverable message returned to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Delivery failed for the following recipients(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message you sent contained an attachment which the recipient has chosen to block. Usually these sort of attachments are blocked to prevent malicious software from being sent to the recipient in question. The name(s) of the blocked file(s) follow: details.pif To send this file, please place it in a compressed archive using WinZip (http://www.winzip.com) or the archive software of your choice. - Original Message Header - Received: by mail7-red (MessageSwitch) id 1063078838110084_391; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 03:40:38 + (UCT) Received: from FDPROD (unknown [194.247.70.198]) by mail7-red.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E487525E0BA for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 03:39:58 + (UCT) From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Your details Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 4:39:07 +0100 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_NextPart_000_02849C2D" Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Logon script pausing logon?
Hi, On our (now replaced) Win2k PDC, the logon script run form netlogon would have to finish before the user would continue to log on. This doesn't seem to be the case for my samba PDC (2.2.8a, RH7.3, Win2k Clients). To questions... 1:Is this normal to not wait for the script to finish, or have I messed up? 2:If I did want the previous behaviour, is there a way of forcing it? Cheers Max. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] valid users field ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If you're using 2.2.* there is a bug in the parsing of the smb.conf: Try this instead (it looks bad but works): valid users = " "@MIXEDDOMAIN+Domain Admins" " - -Tom John H Terpstra wrote: | On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Craig Herring wrote: | | |>How do you specify "Domain Admins" in the field 'valid users'? There |>seems to be a problem with the between Domain and Admins. Is |>there a way to specify this as a group? | | | valid users = @"Domain Admins" | | What version of Samba? | | Is this a local group or a domain group? | ie: Is it in /etc/group? | | - John T. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/XQ0MRliD/69byygRAir/AJ48EhpijxPqFQSoAJCWHjzIM6DVWwCffXmx UuzMBMsDBk5HsX0sEVtPtRY= =j5D4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Winbind and groups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does the command getent group work? You should see the group as a unix group with members. - -Tom Mark Carrara wrote: | I am using Samba ver 2.2.8 as a domain member server. I am using | Winbind for user authorization. I have my home shares working as they | should but I am having trouble with a Share that should be read only for | most users and read write for members of the techs group | (a NT group). | | in my smb.conf file I tired both: | Write List = @GILMAN+techs (GILMAN is the domain, + is the winbind | sererator) | and | Write List = @techs | | neither worked. What am I doing incorrectly? | | Note, when I do a smbstatus the group is reported as GILMAN+techs | | Mark | | Mark Carrara | Technology Coordinator | School District of Gilman | Gilman, WI -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/XQy5RliD/69byygRAqP2AJ97w1noPXw1Ydra78qeZN7WxJvcRACeODBy DegyFJTcHpCgT9vnZ5GwFaM= =EzMZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbclient 3.0.0rc2 fails to connect to win2000 host
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Network has a samba domain controller with various win2000 hosts. > > I just install samba 3.0.0rc2 on one of the linux boxes and can no > longer connect to the win2000 hosts: Please try RC3. I believe this could be fixed by the latest changes in behavior wrt to NTLMv2. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/XTUJIR7qMdg1EfYRAlYFAKCnsvWB1soA4Tu9m8/1TgfCtntrpgCfUV9G pHvQD4WDOdCCYeKgm3e4+Iw= =JAvZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba-3.0.0 RC3 available for download
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Preface - --- Here are the informal plans for the actual 3.0.0 release: We, the Samba Team, hope that this will be the final RC before the real 3.0.0 release. Unless there is a severe bug in the Samba source that would affect a large number of the community, the source/ directory in RC3 will stay the same for 3.0.0. The docs/ directory has not changed between RC2 and RC3. However, there are a lot of documentation updates to be merged before 3.0.0. This will be handled later this week. If all goes as planned, 3.0.0 will be released the first of next week. We're intentionally being vague to leave the possibility of the release as next Monday or Tuesday. Announcement - The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the third release candidate of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. A release candidate implies that the code is very close to a final release, but remember that this is still a non-production snapshot intended for testing purposes. Use it at your own risk. The major issues addressed in this release candidate are 1) Compatibility and compile fixes with Heimdal Kerberos. 2) Disconnection issues in winbindd after prolonged idle periods. 3) More fixes for transitive trusts when acting as a member of an ADS domain. 4) Performance optimizations when using ASCII character sets. The source code can be downloaded from : http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/rc/ The uncompressed tarball and patch file have been signed using GnuPG. The Samba public key is available at http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/samba-pubkey.asc Binary packages are available at http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ A simplified version of the CVS log of updates since 3.0.0rc2 can be found in the the download directory under the name ChangeLog-3.0.0rc2-3.0.0rc3. The release notes are available on-line at http://www.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.0rc3.html Please file any bugs you find in this release at https://bugzilla.samba.org/ As always, all bugs are our responsibility. --Enjoy The Samba Team -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/XTMkIR7qMdg1EfYRAoDNAJ46DPYu+G6uOfLzKsEtdmYsmJMRFwCePqXN czFSO5QPOE9z+T6/A/gdXWY= =93yf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] OT: Samba Market Share?
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 15:49, Anthony L. Awtrey wrote: > I was hoping for other, more specific numbers. Thanks! John and the Samba list, Extra special thanks to John Terpstra who went out of his way to help me find out some meaningful statistics about Samba usage. We chatted on the phone for a long time about all manner of topics tangentally related to my questions. As he said, "Do you think you'd get this kind of response from Microsoft?" My answer: Nope! Thanks again! -- Anthony L. Awtrey Vice President __ I.D.E.A.L. Technology Corporation - Orlando Office http://www.idealcorp.com - 407.999.9870 x13 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Save read only using MS world
If you don't find an easy solution, you might try running a daemon on the samba server which scans the files in this directory and changes the files to read only. The find command sounds like just the thing for this job. Now, don't tell me you have tens of thousands of documents on this server and this will be too much overhead! Perhpas the create mode parameter might be of use here. Joel On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:35:10PM +0100, Simon Oexl wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > I like to ask you for some help. I am fairly new to samba so I do not know > if my intention will work. > > I like to set up a directory where I can save new documents only. Old > documents should be read only. This will prevent from accidental deletion > and overwriting. > > I configured "set mask" to 0555 as this will generate the read only > attribute on Windows. This works fine when I create a text file with an > editor. But when I try to save a word document it will not. Word creates > some temporary file ~xxx.txt and when I try to save with the proper file > name I get an error message. "Disk Full". > > Could you please give me a clue what I could do to get this working with > Word? > > Many thanks and kind regards, > > Simon Oexl > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] The email you authored contained a violation (either a virus or inappropriate content)
Your message was not received by the recipient. The infected component in the scanned document was deleted. Violation Information: The attachment your_document.pif contained the virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and could NOT be repaired. The filename extension of attachment your_document.pif violated the content filtering rule PreprocessIncomingMail Agent. No attempt was made to repair. The name of attachment your_document.pif violated the content filtering rule Virus Attacks. No attempt was made to repair. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[Samba] RE: Re: Approved Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] was quarantined because it contained banned content. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: Re: Approved
An e-mail you sent to the following recipients was infected with a virus and was not delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MessageID: T648f6fbda00a0802745e8 Subject: Re: Approved Attachment: SMTP Messages: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. SMTP Messages: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. SMTP Messages: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. Recognise Executables: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Threat: 'W32/Sobig-F' detected by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Restricted File Types by extension: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'details.pif'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Executables by byte pattern: 'ItemLength.GE.0'. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. Please determine and clean the source of the virus before resending an attachment. (smpnote3) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] passwd not running as root
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:11:30PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > I posted a message about this problem a couple of weeks ago without a > response so I'm trying again. My problem is that samba does not seem to > be running passwd as root when it tries to sync the passwords. For > example, when I run smbpasswd as a user logged onto the samba box I get > the following error: > > machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password change: Error was : RAP86: The > specified password is invalid. > Failed to change password for it I fixed this in CVS a few days ago, it'll be in RC3. Sorry for the problem. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba]max file transfer limitation
Hey guys, I two servers a 2.25 pdc dell hardware and a 2.27 pdc dell hardware, i rsync twice a day so incase the primary server dies i have a hot standby. I am doing a linux backup off of the 2.27 backup server and then i copy files over to a win2k box to dump on to a dvd-r for backups. The problem that i am having from the samba server when i copy a 4gb file over about 3/4 of it it says network name not found. I have tried this with other large files the smallest being 3.8 gigs and it still loses its network name. If i click on the mapped server from my win2k box it shows up. If i ftp the files over i have no problems at all whether it be 3.8gigs or 11 gigs. Any ideas ? Thanks, Raj --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbpasswd -a issues
I'll just go ahead and reply to my own message with some info I've found... see if that inspires anyone to help. After some greping through the smbpasswd source code (pretty clean stuff, if I may say so), I figured the line of death resides in passdb/passdb.c, function pdb_init_sam_new, lines 304 - 307: - pwd = Get_Pwnam(username); if (!pwd) return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER; - Looks like its trying to find a uid for a user that does not exist. Now, this is supposed to be the defined behavior for actual users, but I was under the impression that with ldap as the backend, machines did not need a posix account... and that the RID was generated by some other algorithm. Am I off my rocker here? -Sean On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 13:24, Sean Kellogg wrote: > This totally worked a few days ago... when running 'smbpasswd -a user > -D 5' I get the following: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/niles/ldap/debian# smbpasswd -a user -D 5 > Netbios name list:- > my_netbios_names[0]="LOGOS" > New SMB password: > Retype new SMB password: > Trying to load: ldapsam:ldap://logos.biostat.washington.edu > Attempting to register passdb backend ldapsam > Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam' > Attempting to register passdb backend ldapsam_compat > Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam_compat' > Attempting to register passdb backend smbpasswd > Successfully added passdb backend 'smbpasswd' > Attempting to register passdb backend tdbsam > Successfully added passdb backend 'tdbsam' > Attempting to register passdb backend guest > Successfully added passdb backend 'guest' > Attempting to find an passdb backend to match > ldapsam:ldap://logos.biostat.washington.edu (ldapsam) > Found pdb backend ldapsam > Searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=LOGOS))] > smbldap_search_suffix: searching > for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=LOGOS))] > smbldap_open_connection: connection opened > ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server > The LDAP server is succesful connected > pdb backend ldapsam:ldap://logos.biostat.washington.edu has a valid init > Attempting to find an passdb backend to match guest (guest) > Found pdb backend guest > pdb backend guest has a valid init > smbldap_search_suffix: searching > for:[(&(uid=user)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))] > Unable to locate user [user] count=0 > Finding user user > Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is user > Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as uppercase is USER > Checking combinations of 0 uppercase letters in user > Get_Pwnam_internals didn't find user [user]! > Failed initialise SAM_ACCOUNT for user user. > Failed to modify password entry for user user > > As you can see, I'm using ldap, and running at a higher debug value > shows that I am successfully connecting to the ldap server. This works > fine if the user already has a posix account established... but it used > to create the account automagically. While its not the end of the world > in terms of users, it is very troublesome when trying to add a machine > to the domain (where it evokes smbpasswd -am MACHINE NAME). Again, > broken. But this totally worked a few days ago. While I'm not surp > > The only thing I can think of is that I upgraded to 3.0.0rc2-Debian from > 3.0.0rc1-Debian. But that seems like an odd thing to change. Has > anyone else experienced this problem? > > smb.conf > > [global] > netbios name = logos > workgroup = logos > > encrypt passwords = true > unix password sync = no > ldap passwd sync = yes > pam password change = yes > obey pam restrictions = yes > > domain master = yes > local master = yes > preferred master = yes > os level = 65 > > passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://logos.biostat.washington.edu > ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=biostat,dc=washington,dc=edu > ldap suffix = dc=biostat,dc=washington,dc=edu > ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers > ldap user suffix = ou=People > ldap group suffix = ou=Group > ldap ssl = off > > security = user > domain logons = yes > wins server = 128.95.29.52 > > logon path = \\%L\profiles\%u > logon script = logon.bat > > logon drive = H: > > time server = yes > > idmap uid = 1-65000 > idmap gid = 1-65000 > add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false %u > > printing = BSD > load printers = yes > printer admin = @domadmin > printcap name = /etc/printcap > > > > Help would be appreciated... hell, "it works for me" would even be > good, as then I know its something I'm doing at not the developers. > > -Sean -- Sean Kellogg University of Washington Biostatistics Department - Linux Guy e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]p: 5-9176 "Linux is to the internet what duct tape is to everything else" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and re
[Samba] smbclient 3.0.0rc2 fails to connect to win2000 host
Network has a samba domain controller with various win2000 hosts. I just install samba 3.0.0rc2 on one of the linux boxes and can no longer connect to the win2000 hosts: # smbclient -d 4 -L grossman [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_load(3916) lp_load: refreshing parameters [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 3] param/loadparm.c:init_globals(1300) Initialising global parameters [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 3] param/params.c:pm_process(566) params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf" [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 3] param/loadparm.c:do_section(3419) Processing section "[global]" doing parameter workgroup = CO-RA doing parameter server string = CoRA Disk Server doing parameter printcap name = /etc/printcap doing parameter load printers = no doing parameter log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m doing parameter max log size = 50 doing parameter security = server doing parameter password server = earth doing parameter encrypt passwords = yes doing parameter socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 doing parameter dns proxy = no [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 4] param/loadparm.c:lp_load(3948) pm_process() returned Yes [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=65.171.192.12 bcast=65.171.192.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 3] client/client.c:main(2954) Client started (version 3.0.0rc2). [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(690) Connecting to 65.171.192.18 at port 445 [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 4] client/client.c:do_connect(2563) session request ok [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 4] lib/time.c:get_serverzone(122) Serverzone is 21600 Password: [2003/09/08 16:38:29, 2] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_session_setup_spnego(646) Doing spnego session setup (blob length=16) [2003/09/08 16:38:29, 3] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_session_setup_spnego(650) server didn't supply a full spnego negprot [2003/09/08 16:38:29, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:ntlmssp_client_challenge(486) Got challenge flags: [2003/09/08 16:38:29, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:debug_ntlmssp_flags(39) Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x20890205 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 NTLMSSP_CHAL_TARGET_INFO NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_128 [2003/09/08 16:38:29, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:ntlmssp_client_challenge(529) NTLMSSP: Set final flags: [2003/09/08 16:38:29, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:debug_ntlmssp_flags(39) Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x20080205 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_128 session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Any ideas? This was working fine with samba 2.2.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Mandatory profiles
Hi, I plan to use mandatory profile but I didn´t find a way to NOT allow the user any ability to change the desktop environment. I read in Samba-HOWTO-Colletion that it must be done with policy settings but I can´t find who. I´m running samba-3.0.0rc2 and my clients are all win2k and winXP. Please help me. Bruno Pereti. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem with Win95 + DFS clients (fwd)
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:14:26PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I've found a problem with samba when printing from a client running win95 > + DFS. The print fails with a segmentation fault. The problem is that > Win95 does not return the proper file_fsp( smb_vwv0) when doing an IOCTL > request.This causes the file_fsp call in reply_ioctl (smbd/reply.c) to > fail cause a segmentation fault. > > I do not understand how samba work, but here is my working patch for this. I > just copied the fid from the last open_And_X call and write it into inbuf > if the file_fsp is different. Thanks a lot for this. I've committed a patch that rejects the call rather than core dumping. I'm considering your patch to save the old fnum and re-use it - I'm not sure that's correct in this case. Thanks for the fix though ! Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbpasswd -a issues
This totally worked a few days ago... when running 'smbpasswd -a user -D 5' I get the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/niles/ldap/debian# smbpasswd -a user -D 5 Netbios name list:- my_netbios_names[0]="LOGOS" New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Trying to load: ldapsam:ldap://logos.biostat.washington.edu Attempting to register passdb backend ldapsam Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam' Attempting to register passdb backend ldapsam_compat Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam_compat' Attempting to register passdb backend smbpasswd Successfully added passdb backend 'smbpasswd' Attempting to register passdb backend tdbsam Successfully added passdb backend 'tdbsam' Attempting to register passdb backend guest Successfully added passdb backend 'guest' Attempting to find an passdb backend to match ldapsam:ldap://logos.biostat.washington.edu (ldapsam) Found pdb backend ldapsam Searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=LOGOS))] smbldap_search_suffix: searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=LOGOS))] smbldap_open_connection: connection opened ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server The LDAP server is succesful connected pdb backend ldapsam:ldap://logos.biostat.washington.edu has a valid init Attempting to find an passdb backend to match guest (guest) Found pdb backend guest pdb backend guest has a valid init smbldap_search_suffix: searching for:[(&(uid=user)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))] Unable to locate user [user] count=0 Finding user user Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is user Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as uppercase is USER Checking combinations of 0 uppercase letters in user Get_Pwnam_internals didn't find user [user]! Failed initialise SAM_ACCOUNT for user user. Failed to modify password entry for user user As you can see, I'm using ldap, and running at a higher debug value shows that I am successfully connecting to the ldap server. This works fine if the user already has a posix account established... but it used to create the account automagically. While its not the end of the world in terms of users, it is very troublesome when trying to add a machine to the domain (where it evokes smbpasswd -am MACHINE NAME). Again, broken. But this totally worked a few days ago. While I'm not surp The only thing I can think of is that I upgraded to 3.0.0rc2-Debian from 3.0.0rc1-Debian. But that seems like an odd thing to change. Has anyone else experienced this problem? smb.conf [global] netbios name = logos workgroup = logos encrypt passwords = true unix password sync = no ldap passwd sync = yes pam password change = yes obey pam restrictions = yes domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 65 passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://logos.biostat.washington.edu ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=biostat,dc=washington,dc=edu ldap suffix = dc=biostat,dc=washington,dc=edu ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap group suffix = ou=Group ldap ssl = off security = user domain logons = yes wins server = 128.95.29.52 logon path = \\%L\profiles\%u logon script = logon.bat logon drive = H: time server = yes idmap uid = 1-65000 idmap gid = 1-65000 add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false %u printing = BSD load printers = yes printer admin = @domadmin printcap name = /etc/printcap Help would be appreciated... hell, "it works for me" would even be good, as then I know its something I'm doing at not the developers. -Sean -- Sean Kellogg University of Washington Biostatistics Department - Linux Guy e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]p: 5-9176 "Linux is to the internet what duct tape is to everything else" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] OT: Samba Market Share?
Hello all, Sorry for the slightly off topic post, but does anyone know if a research company somewhere has done any market reports that included Samba as a distinct product from a typical Linux distribution? I know many Linux reports by default include Samba as a 'feature' of Linux, but I was hoping for other, more specific numbers. Thanks! Tony -- Anthony L. Awtrey Vice President __ I.D.E.A.L. Technology Corporation - Orlando Office http://www.idealcorp.com - 407.999.9870 x13 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Trouble with SAMBA Deamons
Hello guys: Im having trouble with my SAMBA server ver. 2.2.8a, the issue that i have is: this server is presenting shutdowns of the samba deamons (smbd and nmbd), in the earlier version i putted this lines in the inetd.conf file netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd –D netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd –D swatstream tcp nowait.400 root /usr/local/samba/bin/swat –D and when a samba deamon turns its process to NOT RUNING, with this lines automaticaly turns that process to a RUNNING state, but in this version it does'nt work. So my questions is: How can i make this possible, like te earlier version? Saludos/Regards... _ Ing. Marco Antonio Salazar Meda DB2 DBA & SAMBA Administrator NCS, IBM Global Services Guadalajara Phone: 3669-7000 Ext. 5207 T/L 877 5207 Fax 36697191 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Save read only using MS world
Dear Sirs, I like to ask you for some help. I am fairly new to samba so I do not know if my intention will work. I like to set up a directory where I can save new documents only. Old documents should be read only. This will prevent from accidental deletion and overwriting. I configured "set mask" to 0555 as this will generate the read only attribute on Windows. This works fine when I create a text file with an editor. But when I try to save a word document it will not. Word creates some temporary file ~xxx.txt and when I try to save with the proper file name I get an error message. "Disk Full". Could you please give me a clue what I could do to get this working with Word? Many thanks and kind regards, Simon Oexl -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 3.0.0rc2 log error message - domain_user_groups related
Hi all: I've looked in the archives and seen several refernces to this error message but no solution put forth. I'm running samba 3.0.0 rc2 on RedHat 9. The following shows up for each of my users in the syslog: Sep 8 15:17:14 main2 smbd[31974]: get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [nsb] is not a Domain group ! Sep 8 15:17:14 main2 smbd[31974]: get_domain_user_groups: You should fix it, NT doesn't like that My smb.conf is the same one from 2.2.3 that I upgraded from. Any idea what is causing this and how to fix it? TIA James -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Virus Found in message " Your details"
Symantec AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you ([EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) sent to Sue Ficker. To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this attachment. Attachment: document_9446.pif Virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action taken: Clean failed : Quarantine succeeded : File status: Infected -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba as a password and file server
Hi all. I ve been trying to do the following: i want my Samba 2.8 to act as a PDC but without using roaming profiles. all of the clients are win2000 pro. is it possible? what do i have to do?? thanks in advance sebastian E-mail y acceso a Internet UltraVeloz totalmente GRATIS en Buenos Aires, Rosario, Cordoba, Mendoza, La Plata y Pilar http://www.Argentina.com Nro. de acceso 5078-5000 Usuario: Argentina Password: Argentina -- Obtenga gratis su cuenta @Argentina.com con AntiVirus, 20mb de espacio y acceso libre UltraVeloz en 24 ciudades www.Argentina.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RES: [Samba] Windows Progamams and Samba PDC
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi Samba users ! >> >> we set up a samba PDC with a Domain in our school net. >> Everything works fine and the W2k Clients are joining the domain. >> But some Programs are not running from the w2k box. >> On the lokal Machine we need an administrational account in order to >> install the windows programs. >> After I log on into the domain I can´t run the programs - it is said, >> that I have not the rights to access. >You should add the "Domain Users" group for your domain in the >Administrators group on your w2k client. Dear John T. I am with the same problem, as I make to add one user of the domain in the Adminitrators group of my w2k client. I have Samba 2.2.3a-12.3. Thanks Rogério. Rogério Oliveira Naressi - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IPEF - Instit. de Pesq. e Est. Florestais - http://www.ipef.br Depto de Ciênc. Florestais-ESALQ/USP - http://lcf.esalq.usp.br -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Undeliverable message returned to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Delivery failed for the following recipients(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message you sent contained an attachment which the recipient has chosen to block. Usually these sort of attachments are blocked to prevent malicious software from being sent to the recipient in question. The name(s) of the blocked file(s) follow: details.pif To send this file, please place it in a compressed archive using WinZip (http://www.winzip.com) or the archive software of your choice. - Original Message Header - Received: by mail6-kan (MessageSwitch) id 1063047706933921_14107; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:01:46 + (UCT) Received: from FDPROD (unknown [194.247.70.198]) by mail6-kan.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C681C28A3 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:00:58 + (UCT) From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Your details Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 20:00:06 +0100 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_NextPart_000_00A96EDE" Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Undeliverable message returned to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Delivery failed for the following recipients(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message you sent contained an attachment which the recipient has chosen to block. Usually these sort of attachments are blocked to prevent malicious software from being sent to the recipient in question. The name(s) of the blocked file(s) follow: your_document.pif To send this file, please place it in a compressed archive using WinZip (http://www.winzip.com) or the archive software of your choice. - Original Message Header - Received: by mail1-red (MessageSwitch) id 1063047509489952_16852; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:58:29 + (UCT) Received: from FDPROD (unknown [194.247.70.198]) by mail1-haw.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F80E1B71 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:58:04 + (UCT) From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Thank you! Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:57:11 +0100 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_NextPart_000_00A6C286" Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] cross-subnet domain join issue
Okay, I'm clearly not as smart as I'd hoped, as I failed to have my Samba PDC connect to our WINS server. Adding the server IP has changed things, but I'm still experiencing difficulties. Here's my nmdb log from startup there's some strange stuff in here. - [2003/09/08 11:29:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130) register_name_response: server at IP 128.95.113.168 rejected our name registration of LOGOS<00> IP 128.95.113.9 with error code 6. [2003/09/08 11:29:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_mynames.c:my_name_register_failed(36) my_name_register_failed: Failed to register my name LOGOS<00> on subnet 128.95.113.9. [2003/09/08 11:29:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283) standard_fail_register: Failed to register/refresh name LOGOS<00> on subnet 128.95.113.9 [2003/09/08 11:29:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:add_logon_names(163) add_domain_logon_names: Attempting to become logon server for workgroup LOGOS on subnet 128.95.113.9 [2003/09/08 11:29:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:add_logon_names(163) add_domain_logon_names: Attempting to become logon server for workgroup LOGOS on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET [2003/09/08 11:29:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(327) become_domain_master_browser_wins: Attempting to become domain master browser on workgroup LOGOS, subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. [2003/09/08 11:29:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(341) become_domain_master_browser_wins: querying WINS server from IP 0.0.0.0 for domain master browser name LOGOS<1b> on workgroup LOGOS [2003/09/08 11:29:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(124) become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup LOGOS on subnet 128.95.113.9 [2003/09/08 11:29:41, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(124) become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup LOGOS on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET [2003/09/08 11:29:41, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_query_fail(252) become_domain_master_query_fail: Error 0 returned when querying WINS server for name LOGOS<1b>. [2003/09/08 11:29:43, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(396) * Samba name server LOGOS is now a local master browser for workgroup LOGOS on subnet 128.95.113.9 * [2003/09/08 11:30:03, 0] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_fail(350) find_domain_master_name_query_fail: Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name LOGOS<1b> for the workgroup LOGOS. Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup. [2003/09/08 11:34:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(327) become_domain_master_browser_wins: Attempting to become domain master browser on workgroup LOGOS, subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. [2003/09/08 11:34:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(341) become_domain_master_browser_wins: querying WINS server from IP 0.0.0.0 for domain master browser name LOGOS<1b> on workgroup LOGOS [2003/09/08 11:34:40, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_query_fail(252) become_domain_master_query_fail: Error 0 returned when querying WINS server for name LOGOS<1b>. [2003/09/08 11:39:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(327) become_domain_master_browser_wins: Attempting to become domain master browser on workgroup LOGOS, subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. [2003/09/08 11:39:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(341) become_domain_master_browser_wins: querying WINS server from IP 0.0.0.0 for domain master browser name LOGOS<1b> on workgroup LOGOS [2003/09/08 11:39:25, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(95) process_logon_packet: Logon from 128.95.113.168: code = 0x12 [2003/09/08 11:39:25, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(95) process_logon_packet: Logon from 128.95.113.168: code = 0x12 [2003/09/08 11:39:46, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_query_fail(252) become_domain_master_query_fail: Error 0 returned when querying WINS server for name LOGOS<1b>. Some googling tells me that its okay that it might be okay for the IP to be listed as 0.0.0.0... but I'm not so sure. Can anyone confirm? In addition, any theories as to what exactly Error 0 might be... what about Error 6? Thanks, Sean On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 04:34, Richard Coates wrote: > Hi Sean, all you need for cross-subnet browsing/domain functionality is > correct routing...no port blocking/firewall problems across routers etc. > ONE only wins server with ALL severs/clients using it. > netbios over tcp (I havent tried setup without this) > correctly setup pdc and Xp/Nt/2k/linux as local subnet master browsers. > All is explained nicely in the old "browsing.txt" doc, and probably > included in the new samba3 docs. > Richard Coates. > > On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 08:04, Sean Kellogg wrote: > > So, I already sent this message once before (yester
Re: [Samba] winbindd instability, inconsistent handling of Domain name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Alexander List wrote: > After a while, wbinfo [-u|-g] returns > > server:/var/log/samba# wbinfo -g > Error looking up domain groups Should be fixed in RC3 due out later today/tonight. > My second problem: > > I created a directory /mnt/admin with this ACL: > > # file: . > # owner: root > # group: root > user::rwx > user:DOMAIN+username:rwx > group::r-x > mask::rwx > other::r-x > > When I create the ACL with setfacl -m u:INTERNAL.DOMAIN.COM:username:rwx, > only DOMAIN+username (the short NETBIOS name of the domain) is listed in > the ACL. This is because the INTERNAL.DOMAIN.COM:username and DOMAIN+username map to the same SID (assuming that INTERNAL.DOMAIN.COM is the realm and DOMAIN is the short domain name). Therefore winbind always uses the short form of the domain name for specifying users. So the uid -> SID -> name lookup ends up with DOMAIN+username. > I created the following Samba share: > > [admin] > browsable = no > path = /mnt/admin > public = no > write list = DOMAIN+username > > This won't work. Windows domain user "username" gets "Access denied" when > trying to create a file on the share. ... > However, this works: > > write list = INTERNAL.DOMAIN.COM+username Can you send me a level 10 debug log? Thanks. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/XMsIIR7qMdg1EfYRAq+xAJ4/HzYxi/IIMQYMjF5SWDl2gECf+QCfYiCk 06igPvXN/Wb3uh9v50AkcbU= =R09F -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] System Policy Windows 98
I am currently using my Samba Server as a PDC with Windows 98 clients. I am using the Windows system policy editor to generate config.pol files for these clients. I edit the policy ant then copy it to the [netlogon] share on the Samba server. My problem is this... Policies I set under default computer appear to load and function just fine on client machines, but policies I set under default user seem to have no affect. Any ideas? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Winbind and groups
I am using Samba ver 2.2.8 as a domain member server. I am using Winbind for user authorization. I have my home shares working as they should but I am having trouble with a Share that should be read only for most users and read write for members of the techs group (a NT group). in my smb.conf file I tired both: Write List = @GILMAN+techs (GILMAN is the domain, + is the winbind sererator) and Write List = @techs neither worked. What am I doing incorrectly? Note, when I do a smbstatus the group is reported as GILMAN+techs Mark Mark Carrara Technology Coordinator School District of Gilman Gilman, WI -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] valid users field ?
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Craig Herring wrote: > How do you specify "Domain Admins" in the field 'valid users'? There > seems to be a problem with the between Domain and Admins. Is > there a way to specify this as a group? valid users = @"Domain Admins" What version of Samba? Is this a local group or a domain group? ie: Is it in /etc/group? - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] valid users field ?
How do you specify "Domain Admins" in the field 'valid users'? There seems to be a problem with the between Domain and Admins. Is there a way to specify this as a group? Thanks, Craig Herring -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[Samba] Re: Re: My details Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] was quarantined because it contained banned content. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Host NTFS Shares on Samba Server?
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:33:30AM -0800, Tim Jordan, Network Services wrote: > "Tim" == Tim Jordan, Network Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tim> Running Samba 2.2.8a I have a secondary hard drive (100GB) Tim> full of desktop images that I would like to share. The drive Tim> is installed in my Samba server and currently setup in fstab Tim> as: Tim> /dev/hda2 /mnt/myntfs ntfs defaults 0 0 Tim> This allows root access read permissions. Tim> Can I setup my Samba server to allow domain admins to access Tim> the data on this secondary drive? You should be able to just create a share that points to /mnt/myntfs You might want to set 'read only = true' for the share. Did you try this and get some sort of error message? Why do you think you need to treat the drive above any differently from any other share? -- Eric M. Boehm /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML or RTF in mail X No proprietary word-processing Respect Open Standards / \ files in mail -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: My details
You have sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since I am on vacation from September 6 to September 21, I can not answer e-mail during this time. Your mail has been stored and I will read it when I am back. If you need assistence with Sharity, please mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for the inconvenience! Regards, Christian's e-mail answering machine. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Host NTFS Shares on Samba Server?
Running Samba 2.2.8a I have a secondary hard drive (100GB) full of desktop images that I would like to share. The drive is installed in my Samba server and currently setup in fstab as: /dev/hda2 /mnt/myntfs ntfs defaults 0 0 This allows root access read permissions. Can I setup my Samba server to allow domain admins to access the data on this secondary drive? Please advise, Tim Jordan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: The specified network name is no longer available
Paul Casteels wrote: I am using Samba version 2.2.8a-0.1.ql.w on Debian 3.0. When copying a file with Win2K/SP2 I get an error message. A file is created but with zero size. If I try again the file is copied properly. I have disabled acl support and oplocks without success. On my 2.2.8a on RedHat 7.2 everything works fine and I have compared the smb.conf. E:\brol>dir 14/06/2003 17:381,474 a.py E:\brol>copy a.py b.py The specified network name is no longer available. 0 file(s) copied. E:\brol>dir 14/06/2003 17:381,474 a.py 02/09/2003 11:340 b.py E:\brol>copy a.py b.py Overwrite b.py? (Yes/No/All): y 1 file(s) copied. E:\brol>dir 14/06/2003 17:381,474 a.py 14/06/2003 17:381,474 b.py These are the last loglines when the operation fails : [2003/09/08 16:57:24, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(387) unix_clean_name [brol/t1.f] [2003/09/08 16:57:24, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(973) calling open_file with flags=0x2 flags2=0x240 mode=0744 [2003/09/08 16:57:24, 10] smbd/open.c:fd_open(53) fd_open: name brol/t1.f, flags = 0102 mode = 0744, fd = 23. [2003/09/08 16:57:24, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(246) CASTEELS opened file brol/t1.f read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=1) [2003/09/08 16:57:24, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1074) open_file_shared : share_mode = 42 [2003/09/08 16:57:24, 10] locking/locking.c:set_share_mode(693) set_share_mode: creating entry for file brol/t1.f. num_share_modes = 1 [2003/09/08 16:57:24, 10] locking/locking.c:print_share_mode_table(445) print_share_mode_table: share_mode_entry[0]: pid = 16042, share_mode = 0x42, desired_access = 0x3, port = 0x0, type= 0x0, file_id = 1, dev = 0x3a00, inode = 1485681 The behaviour is the same with smbclient. The Debian machine uses a ReiserFS on a raid0 partition. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Antigen found VIRUS= Sobig.F@m (Norman, VBuster, CA(InoculateIT), Sophos) worm
Antigen for Exchange found your_details.pif infected with VIRUS= [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Norman,VBuster,CA(InoculateIT),Sophos) worm. The message is currently Purged. The message, "Re: Your application", was sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and was discovered in SMTP Messages\Inbound located at Family Office Exchange -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Using a squared in the dir name
Hello, On my old Windows platform (before I migrated to Samba), I had shared out a directory name with an odd character, and wonder if it is possible to do this in Samba, where the dir name might be something like MC² (if you cannot see that, it would be MC and a squared symbol). Is that a legal share name? Anyone tried this before? Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Can't compile Samba 3.0rc2 with ldap & ldapsam Solaris 9
Hi All, Here is my configure script: ./configure --with-ldap --with-ldapsam Configure works ok. But during make the following error message was received. Using FLAGS = -g -O2 -Iinclude -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.0rc2/source/include -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.0rc2/source/ubiqx -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.0rc2/source/smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.0rc2/source LIBS = -lsendfile -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -ldl -liconv LDSHFLAGS = -G LDFLAGS = Compiling dynconfig.c In file included from include/includes.h:896, from dynconfig.c:21: include/proto.h:492: parse error before "LDAP_CONST" make: *** [dynconfig.o] Error 1 I have installed OpenLDAP 2.1.22 as per below: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/openldap \ --without-bdb \ --disable-bdb \ --enable-null make make install My environment variable have been changed prior to building Samba as follows: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/openldap/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/sfw/lib PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/openldap/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/ucb:/usr/dt/bin:/usr/openwin/bin and changed my LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PATH variables to include the Close... but still no cigar. If anyone has any experience building Samba 3.0 on Solaris 9 with ldap support I would love to hear from you. Thanks in advance for any help received. btw. I have now successfully converted the samba.schema file provided in examples/LDAP to a suitable form for importing into iPlanet Directory Server 5.x if anyone is interested. The one currently provided only provides for sambaAccount not SambaSamAccount. Darren - This mail was sent using Scout WebMail https://webmail.vicscouts.asn.au/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Computer Appears in Wrong Workgroup
Hello, First of all thank you for your fast reply! I backed up my smb.conf and deleted several samba directories (/var/lib/samba, /var/log/samba, /var/samba/cache or something like that, and another), did a remove --purge samba and reinstalled, immediately after replacing smb.conf with the one I'd saved and restarting the samba service. I'm still on the "Workgroup" workgroup according to both my machine and a Windows one in the area- though I can't access my share because LinNeighborhood "Can't resolve address" and Windows "Cannot find the network name". Is the change supposed to take a while while it filters through the SMB network? Any other ideas? Maybe Samba starting by default when I install the package messes up, and if I replaced the default smb.conf with my own before Samba starts for the first time it would work? That sounds awfully weird to me though, that it would be dependent on anything other than this one smb.conf file and reloading/restarting smbd... Thanks again, Dan Eric DECORNOD wrote: Dan Rasmussen wrote: Hello, I'm using Samba 3.0.0rc2-Debian on Debian unstable. At the time being it does everything I want it to except one: I'm in the wrong workgroup. Despite the line workgroup = BETASIG in my smb.conf, I show up in the workgroup "WORKGROUP." There is no mention of "workgroup" or "WORKGROUP" anywhere else in my smb.conf other than this. Would be happy to share my smb.conf if that helps or provide any other relevant information. Thanks, Daniel Rasmussen You can try to backup and remove the content of /var/lib/samba/ and restart samba or try a dpkg-reconfigure on the main package. I may help, if some of the files are not re-created you can take them back from your backup or extract the content of the .deb package (dpkg-deb --extract) to find a 'clean' verion of them. A more radical stuff you might try is to back-up your smb.conf and 'purge'-reinstall the package. I hope it'll help you, i use the same version of that package and don't have such problem. _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: [SLE] Any way to do Linux User home directories via Samba
Sébastien Taylor wrote: The way we handle this at my office is by sharing over samba to the windows clients, and by nfs to the linux clients. The nfs exports the same data as smb so it's identical, but nfs is better suited for unix. Jason Joines a écrit: All of our user authentication is done via LDAP. We have an all Linux backend and tons of windows desktops. We've just started getting a few people to move to Linux on the desktop. Is there any way that I can have their home directory automatically mounted via Samba when they log in? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind I use NFS for my Linux desktop. However, our users have root access to their desktops and I'm concerned about the security of the server in that situation. I no I can squash root but if the user can create a local user with the same numeric userid as some other user, they could then use that local account to access someone else's files on the NFS server. Maybe I just don't know how to set up the export properly. I also like Samba better since I can open up just one port to the client. Jason === -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbd uses very high load on CPU
The Server machine: I have a Solaris 2.6 server(Ultra 2, 200mhz, 512megs, loads of disks(about 48 total drives hanging on this beast). It is running Samba version 2.2.8. Client machine: Win 2000 The problem: Compiling code via Visual C++, source files and all that fun stuff are on a drive on the Solaris box, being accessed via Samba. On the server, the CPU load for smbd when compiling goes up to around 60-80 percent. It noticably slows down compilation. Examples Code on Solaris server(over network): 20 minute build time Code on Windows server(over network): 8 minute build time Code locally on the PC: 7 minute build time. Should it really be that slow off a Samba share? Could it be a config issue? Are there any things that can be done to help this out some? All machines are on a single 100meg Full duplex switch( and are 100 FD) -grant -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Simple configuration and not working.
First, i'm sorry to be so silly that i don't even to success a basic samba configuration simply working. Compilation of the rc2 had no errors. testparm against my smb.conf said ok, and i can start nmbd and smbd. I also add a new unix user, said toto, and added it in samba. The problem is that i can't connect to any share, via Windows or via GNU/Linux. The result from Windows is a new windows requiring a valid username/password and from linux, a deny message. However, share seems to be well exported. I read as many doc as i could and know that auth is made before all attempt to connect to any share. So i think this is not any bad right on share, but an account problem. Please help since there is a couple of week i'm searching. Thank's in advance. Here are my smb.conf file and my entries Here is my smb.conf : [global] workgroup = MYGROUP netbios name = DATA preferred master = No local master = No domain master = No [homes] read only = No [myshare] path = /mnt/mypath valid users = toto read only = No on the server : data:/usr/local/samba# ./bin/smbpasswd -a toto New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Added user toto. data:/usr/local/samba# On the client ~# /usr/bin/smbclient //172.26.123.9/myshare -U toto added interface ip=139.54.25.234 bcast=139.54.27.255 nmask=255.255.252.0 Password: session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows Progamams and Samba PDC
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Samba users ! > > we set up a samba PDC with a Domain in our school net. > Everything works fine and the W2k Clients are joining the domain. > But some Programs are not running from the w2k box. > On the lokal Machine we need an administrational account in order to > install the windows programs. > After I log on into the domain I can´t run the programs - it is said, > that I have not the rights to access. You should add the "Domain Users" group for your domain in the Administrators group on your w2k client. > We put a User root with the same password on our lokal Machines - and > the lokal group of Administrators - but the Programs run only when I > log in the lokal W2k Wks :( > > Please Help! > > Thanks a lot !!! - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0.0 RC1: Unable to find a suitable server
> Does this apply to you? (from the 3.0.0rc2 WHATSNEW) > > MIT kerberos 1.3.1 supports the ARCFOUR-HMAC-MD5 encryption > type which is neccessary for servers on which the > administrator password has not been changed, or kerberos-enabled > SMB connections to servers that require Kerberos SMB signing. > Besides this one difference, either MIT or Heimdal Kerberos > distributions are usable by Samba 3.0. Uh oh. Well, I guess I didn't make my homework well enough. I'll try this out tomorrow and get back to you with the results. Cheers, Axel. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Computer Appears in Wrong Workgroup
Dan Rasmussen wrote: Hello, I'm using Samba 3.0.0rc2-Debian on Debian unstable. At the time being it does everything I want it to except one: I'm in the wrong workgroup. Despite the line workgroup = BETASIG in my smb.conf, I show up in the workgroup "WORKGROUP." There is no mention of "workgroup" or "WORKGROUP" anywhere else in my smb.conf other than this. Would be happy to share my smb.conf if that helps or provide any other relevant information. Thanks, Daniel Rasmussen You can try to backup and remove the content of /var/lib/samba/ and restart samba or try a dpkg-reconfigure on the main package. I may help, if some of the files are not re-created you can take them back from your backup or extract the content of the .deb package (dpkg-deb --extract) to find a 'clean' verion of them. A more radical stuff you might try is to back-up your smb.conf and 'purge'-reinstall the package. I hope it'll help you, i use the same version of that package and don't have such problem. -- Eric DECORNOD Service Informatique IUT Louis Pasteur Schiltigheim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Re: domain join - no sambaSamAccount created
Let's hope so... :) if you didn't work it out yet send your smb.conf and attach "add machine script" too, I can test it on this system. Maybe that will give us some answers. Please do a 'reply to all' since I am not in the list. Cheers! Bjorn -Original Message- From: samba-request [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 5 september 2003 17:27 To: samba Cc: udettmer Subject: [Samba] Re: domain join - no sambaSamAccount created Hi, thanks for your quick answer, Bjorn ! > - first make a machine-account _ONLY_ in PosixAccount. Yes, I used /usr/bin/cpu useradd machine$ -d /dev/null -f /etc/samba/scripts/machadd.cfg -F machine$ -L machine$ -g 511 -p xxx to create a valid Unix user ( User object with posixAccount auxilliary class extended ). Samba still does not add it's sambaSamAccount class if I create the machine account this way. However, "smbpasswd -amn" works and I can join the Windows box to the domain if I run both commands manually. > - then try to run the wizard from XP with a (or better to be sure, THE) > root account. Sorry, I forget to mention it - I am already using the root account for this. > You need to have "add machine script" configed for this ofcourse. My problem seems to be, that *only* the "add machine script" script is running, but Samba forgets to do it's own job ( adding the sambaSamAccount aux. class to the user object ). > I had the same problem adding clients to the domain... > but when I tried this procedure, it worked 4 me. Hopefully I will get this far soon, too ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Anybody knows?
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Pablo Jejcic wrote: > What is the meaning of this message in the log files: > > Smbd/nttrans.c: (1762) > Call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented It means the client requested a SMB/CIFS function call that Samba-2.2.2 does not support. You should update to Samba-2.2.8a or Samba-3.0.0 when it ships (very soon). > Samba Version: 2.2.2 > Client Windows XP Professional > > > Any ideas or anything that you can tell me will be really appreciated. Hope that helps. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] MIT Kerberos 5 won't work with latest Samba 3.0.0cvs
As I learned from former threads, "net ads join" should not only join the Samba server to ADS, but also create Kerberos 5 credentials on the Linux box running Samba 3.0. Well, thanks Jerry joining the Samba 3.0 to ADS works now, but I won't get any Kerberos 5 credentials. winbindd throws errors because of missing Kerberos credentials. Kerberos 5 support is copiled into my samba binaries. I'm using following RPMs of MIT Kerberos 5: krb5-workstation-1.2.7-14 pam_krb5-1.60-1 krb5-devel-1.2.7-14 krb5-server-1.2.7-14 krb5-libs-1.2.7-14 Kerberos 5 is working like a charm with my Windows 2003 Server: *** SNIP *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# klist klist: No credentials cache found (ticket cache FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0) Kerberos 4 ticket cache: /tmp/tkt0 klist: You have no tickets cached [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# klist Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Default principal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Valid starting ExpiresService principal 09/08/03 14:59:09 09/09/03 00:59:09 krbtgt/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kerberos 4 ticket cache: /tmp/tkt0 klist: You have no tickets cached [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# kdestroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# klist klist: No credentials cache found (ticket cache FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0) Kerberos 4 ticket cache: /tmp/tkt0 klist: You have no tickets cached [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# *** SNAP *** If I now join my Samba 30 Server to my Windows 2003 ADS, I won't get any credentials: *** SNIP *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]# net ads join -U Administrator -d3 [2003/09/08 15:15:16, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_load(3914) lp_load: refreshing parameters [2003/09/08 15:15:16, 3] param/loadparm.c:init_globals(1300) Initialising global parameters [2003/09/08 15:15:17, 3] param/params.c:pm_process(566) params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf" [2003/09/08 15:15:17, 3] param/loadparm.c:do_section(3417) Processing section "[global]" [2003/09/08 15:15:17, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=192.168.0.201 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Administrator password: [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 3] libads/ldap.c:ads_connect(218) Connected to LDAP server 192.168.0.200 [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 3] libads/ldap.c:ads_server_info(1877) got ldap server name [EMAIL PROTECTED], using bind path: dc=SAMBA30,dc=TEST [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 3] libads/sasl.c:ads_sasl_spnego_bind(184) got OID=1 2 840 48018 1 2 2 [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 3] libads/sasl.c:ads_sasl_spnego_bind(184) got OID=1 2 840 113554 1 2 2 [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 3] libads/sasl.c:ads_sasl_spnego_bind(184) got OID=1 2 840 113554 1 2 2 3 [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 3] libads/sasl.c:ads_sasl_spnego_bind(184) got OID=1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10 [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 3] libads/sasl.c:ads_sasl_spnego_bind(191) got [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(269) krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found) [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 3] libads/ldap.c:ads_workgroup_name(1969) Found alternate name 'SAMBA30' for realm 'SAMBA30.TEST' Using short domain name -- SAMBA30 Joined 'SAMBA30SRV' to realm 'SAMBA30.TEST' [2003/09/08 15:15:27, 2] utils/net.c:main(758) return code = 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# klist klist: No credentials cache found (ticket cache FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0) Kerberos 4 ticket cache: /tmp/tkt0 klist: You have no tickets cached [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# *** SNAP *** Of course, winbindd throws errors without Kerberos 5 credentials: *** SNIP *** [2003/09/08 11:43:59, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:add_trusted_domain(149) Added domain SAMBA30 SAMBA30.TEST [2003/09/08 11:43:59, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(269) krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found) *** SNAP *** Any suggestions? Cheers, Axel. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0.0 RC1: Unable to find a suitable server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Axel Suppantschitsch wrote: > Anyway, my problems with Kerberos 5 (I am using the MIT version and not > Heimdal) and SMB signing (Windows 2003 Server?) still exist. I'll open > two new threads for them, maybe we can resolve them as effectivly as the > "ads join bug". Thanks for your help! What version of MIT? Have I asked you this? (sorry...it's all running together now). Does this apply to you? (from the 3.0.0rc2 WHATSNEW) MIT kerberos 1.3.1 supports the ARCFOUR-HMAC-MD5 encryption type which is neccessary for servers on which the administrator password has not been changed, or kerberos-enabled SMB connections to servers that require Kerberos SMB signing. Besides this one difference, either MIT or Heimdal Kerberos distributions are usable by Samba 3.0. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/XIK7IR7qMdg1EfYRAu5TAJ9AJ35dbxJfqiVBZLuUMItPJO4mDwCgr/gh j1oQhDRacL5Dj8T84HJbHeo= =J5JP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Computer Appears in Wrong Workgroup
Hello, I'm using Samba 3.0.0rc2-Debian on Debian unstable. At the time being it does everything I want it to except one: I'm in the wrong workgroup. Despite the line workgroup = BETASIG in my smb.conf, I show up in the workgroup "WORKGROUP." There is no mention of "workgroup" or "WORKGROUP" anywhere else in my smb.conf other than this. Would be happy to share my smb.conf if that helps or provide any other relevant information. Thanks, Daniel Rasmussen _ Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] winbindd instability, inconsistent handling of Domain name
Hello world, I'm currently experimenting with a new Samba server that is to be integrated in an existing ADS domain. System is Debian Woody, plus samba 3.0.0beta2+3.0.0rc2-1 and necessary dependencies. Kernel is 2.4.21 + Debian patches + XFS ii libc6 2.3.2-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Linux bigberta 2.4.21-4-686-xfs #1 Mon Aug 25 15:44:37 CEST 2003 i686 smbd, nmbd and winbindd are working fine, I could joint the AD Domain in native mode, created partitions using XFS (with ACL support), and wbinfo -u bzw. wbinfo -g list the domain users and groups correctly. My first problem: After a while, wbinfo [-u|-g] returns server:/var/log/samba# wbinfo -g Error looking up domain groups After restarting winbindd, it works again for a while. What's the proper way to produce useful debugging information for the developers? My second problem: I created a directory /mnt/admin with this ACL: # file: . # owner: root # group: root user::rwx user:DOMAIN+username:rwx group::r-x mask::rwx other::r-x When I create the ACL with setfacl -m u:INTERNAL.DOMAIN.COM:username:rwx, only DOMAIN+username (the short NETBIOS name of the domain) is listed in the ACL. I created the following Samba share: [admin] browsable = no path = /mnt/admin public = no write list = DOMAIN+username This won't work. Windows domain user "username" gets "Access denied" when trying to create a file on the share. However, this works: write list = INTERNAL.DOMAIN.COM+username Is this a bug or a configuration problem on my side? Another thing I found in the winbindd log file: [2003/09/07 16:36:26, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(147) user 'MACHINE$' does not exist MACHINE$ is the Windows client I'm using to access the share. Thanks for any hints! Alex -- "UNLESS someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." --Dr. Seuss, fromThe Lorax -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0.0 RC1: Unable to find a suitable server
Thanks for your update, it seems to be working now. log.winbindd shows following: [2003/09/08 11:43:59, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:add_trusted_domain(149) Added domain SAMBA30 SAMBA30.TEST Anyway, my problems with Kerberos 5 (I am using the MIT version and not Heimdal) and SMB signing (Windows 2003 Server?) still exist. I'll open two new threads for them, maybe we can resolve them as effectivly as the "ads join bug". Thanks for your help! Cheers, Axel. Quoting "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OK. I think we can handle this (no workgroup defined in smb.conf; only a > realm) in the current SAMBA_3_0 cvs. I just checked in the fix so give > the anonymous cvs tree a little bit of time to sync up before you > update. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows Progamams and Samba PDC
Hi Samba users ! we set up a samba PDC with a Domain in our school net. Everything works fine and the W2k Clients are joining the domain. But some Programs are not running from the w2k box. On the lokal Machine we need an administrational account in order to install the windows programs. After I log on into the domain I can´t run the programs - it is said, that I have not the rights to access. We put a User root with the same password on our lokal Machines - and the lokal group of Administrators - but the Programs run only when I log in the lokal W2k Wks :( Please Help! Thanks a lot !!! axel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: samba+ldap passwd sync
Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Hi ! I'm in trouble... I'm in the way of building a FreeBSD Samba server with LDAP support. So far, everything works great except password synchronization. It is the only thing I need left to do before my server goes into production, so I'm really looking for help. What I need is to be able to synchronize the Windows passwords with the Unix passwords. All passwords are stored in LDAP (ntPassword, lmPassword, userPassword), so there're no real Unix accounts (I use pam_ldap+nss_ldap). I read a lot of docs, tried a lot of scripts (ldapsync, ldapchpasswd...) but I cannot make it work. First, I think "passwd program" is never launched, and second, I doubt those scripts work well with FreeBSD and crypted passwords. If there's anyone out there willing to help, I'd really appreciate, I'm out of ideas... Thanks. Antoine In samba 3.0.0 (if you use it) you have 'ldap password sync = yes' to sync when SMB's passwords change. For the reverse, I'm still trying without any results yet. My current tries are about pam_smbpass.so module, but it seems to be more difficult than i'd expect. In my oppinion, when using ldap password sync, the passord program isn't used any more. I hope you'll have more chance than me. -- Eric DECORNOD Service Informatique IUT Louis Pasteur Schiltigheim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem with roaming profiles
Am Son, 2003-09-07 um 15.23 schrieb Tilo Lutz: > Hi > > After changing from samba 2.2.7 to 3.0.rc2 I can't get roaming profiles > work. Clients Are W2K and XP. > I've also switched from smbpasswd backend to ldap. Logon path is only > set in smb.conf, not in ldap. > Storing of profiles is working but it takes very long. > I've tried logon path = \\wilma2\profile\Win2K and \\wilma2\profile. > But the clients are always storing profile in \\wilma2\profile\Win2K. > Is it possible windows is caching home path anywere? If I set attribute sambaProfilePath in ldap profiles are working Why isn't the global parameter logon path = "\\WILMA2\profile\Win2K" in smb.conf used? Setting sambaProfilePath = "\\WILMA2\profile has worked, but why? The correct setting would be \\wilma2\profile\Win2K Any idea? Tilo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba-3 Ldap Adding Administrator Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you add an "Administrator" account to ldap. I want to leave root in /etc/passwd but have "Administrator" in ldap I have checked Howto Collection and the Samba-Ldap-3 but they contain no information. The Ldap-Howto has a suggestion but then says not to use. Godfrey I don't know which version of samba you have, i use samba 3.0.0rc2 and LDAP. I didn't wanted to have root in LDAP too as I plan to use my LDAP for two servers and I don't want the same root account/password. In my smb.conf i write : passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1 tdbsam guest then restart samba, and launch : pdbedit -b tdbsam -a root You can check if it worked with pdbedit -b tdbsam -L -v It worked for me perfectly. I've added later root and a few others to the "Domain Admin" group in a LDAP entry. The drawback is that the account's still named 'root', not 'Administrator'. I hope i'll help you a bit. -- Eric DECORNOD, Service Informatique IUT Louis Pasteur Schiltigheim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] pam_smbpass.so + samba300RC2 + LDAP
We've got the 'ldap auth sync = yes' working perfectly, but we'd like to have the SMB's passwords updated via passwd an PAM aware apps. We tryed pam_smbpass.so but without any effects no matter of the different required, sufficient or optionnal keywords in the /etc.pam.d/passwd : passwd sufficient pam_ldap.so passwd optionnal pam_smbpass.so audit nullok use_authtok try_first_pass passwd required pam_unix.so try_first_pass ... Has anyone successfully achieved this ? I'm wondering if pam_smbpass has been fully rewrited for 3.0.0's branch to support ldapsam. Further, i'd like that a user with only a valid PAM passwd could init his SMB passwd with a simple passwd... In my oppinion, it should be straightway done by the use_authtok itself in pam_smbpass. NOTE: We use Debian's unstable version of the required packages (samba-*, libpam-smbpass) and the new LDAP SAM schema. Thanks in advance, -- Julien DUPRE & Eric DECORNOD Service Informatique IUT Louis Pasteur Schiltigheim Allée d'Athènes 67300 Schiltigheim Tel : 03 902 42 547 Courriel : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NT domain user and local unix group
Hi, i need to add NT domain user to a local unix user; the samba server 3.0 isn't a PDC or a BDC but only a domain machine member with on share directory. Now i use ACL on filesystem to setting permissions. What i need is to setting this permissions based on local unix group and add NT domain members on this local group. Winbind works fine, so I can see domain users and domain groups, even with wbinfo and getent commands (I setup the nsswitch.conf file). I try to add a domain user to local unix group with gpasswd but winbind ignore it so i can't access to a directory with ACL for this local unix group. Thanks in advance, Simone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Information: IRIX 6.5.21 and samba 3.0.0RC2
Regards, I have seen one posting regarding the Error loading module '/local/samba/lib/charset/ISO8859-1.so': 291311:/local/samba/sbin/smbd: rld: Fatal Error: Cannot Successfully map soname '/local/samba/lib/charset/ISO8859-1.so' under any of the filenames /local/samba/lib/charset/ISO8859-1.so message and a reply from Samba team member Gerald Carter Please note that when compiling 3.0.0RC2 for IRIX, it seems that IRIX versions up to and including 6.5.21 need GNU libiconv to avoid the errormessages above. That is, do a configure including the --with-libiconv=/path/to/GNU/libiconv switch. If someone did manage to install 3.0.0RC2 on IRIX without use of GNU libiconv and avoiding the above messages, please drop me a note at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiler used: MIPSpro 7.4 -- ** * Knut Hellebø | DAMN GOOD COFFEE !! * * Hydro IS Partner ESI (Unix) Team | (and hot too) * * Phone: +4755996870, Fax: +4755995620 | * * Cellular Phone: +47 93005151 | * * E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Dale Cooper, FBI* ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: roaming profile
> I have followed the notes from Using Samba for > an XP client. However when I goto create the > profile I get permission denide. However, as > you see below, the permissions I'm using > on /etc/samba/profiles is 777 so that is a > little confusing. > ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/samba# testparm /etc/samba/smb.conf That wasn't necessary, Aschley. It would have been better to just show us your smb.conf, not all the defaults that smbd would assume. But before a smart Alec quotes your whole posting all over again, here is what I think is wrong: > [global] > . > logon script = %U.bat > logon path = \\%L\etc\samba\profiles\%U > logon drive = > logon home = \\%N\%U > . > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > read only = No > browseable = No > > [netlogon] > comment = Network Logon Service > path = /etc/samba/netlogon > guest ok = Yes > share modes = No > > [profiles] > path = /etc/samba/profiles > read only = No > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > browseable = No > csc policy = disable The profiles paths in [global] and in [profiles] are contradictory. The [profiles] path is OK if your profiles are on your samba server under /etc/samba/profiles. But the logon path in [global] should then be "\\%L\profiles\%U" because "profiles" is the share not "/etc/samba/profiles", which is just the path to it for samba to know what to export as share "profiles". The logon home is also ambiguous, unless your samba server is itself the NIS server. It would better be "\\%L\$U". > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/samba# ls -al > total 68 > drwxr-xr-x 5 0/0 4096 Sep 5 22:57 . > drwxr-xr-x 42 0/0 4096 Sep 4 14:20 .. > drwxrwxrwx 2 0/0 4096 Aug 6 09:27 netlogon > drwx-- 2 0/0 4096 Aug 6 09:29 private > drwxrwxrwx 2 0/0 4096 Sep 5 20:53 profiles > -rw-r--r-- 1 0/0 7201 Sep 5 20:52 smb.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 0/0 9044 Mar 16 07:52 smb.conf-sample > -rw-r--r-- 1 0/0 23858 Aug 17 15:59 smb.conf.bak > -rw-r--r-- 1 0/0 4096 Sep 5 22:57 typescript You don't really want 777 perms for netlogn and profiles, 775 is OK if you don't mind everyone being able to know what users there are, 771 is much better, because it prevents everyone else from even finding out what users there are and still everyone can get his roaming profiles if you set proper perms on the individual subdirectories. Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International Recipients: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:Virus Found in message "Re: Thank you!" Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. Message from CN=charanjit dingri/O=Volac International was quarantined because it contained banned content. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Anybody knows?
What is the meaning of this message in the log files: Smbd/nttrans.c: (1762) Call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented Samba Version: 2.2.2 Client Windows XP Professional Any ideas or anything that you can tell me will be really appreciated. Cheers! *** Pablo Jejcic Smartweb Senior system Administrator School of Computing - Robert Gordon University http://www.smartweb.rgu.ac.uk *** The greatest homage we can pay truth is to use it. - Ralph Waldo Emerson *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba-LDAP Howto
Ganael, How about a lesson in French to us English speaking folks? :) Raj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ganael LAPLANCHE Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Samba-LDAP Howto Hi all, For those of you who speak French, I've writtent a small Samba 2.2.8a/Ldap Howto. It's available on my website : http://www.martymac.com (Avoid the html format still the conversion isn't really perfect !). I hope this document will help you :) Regards, Ganaël LAPLANCHE. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] mount
how tou automatic mount file server , so every boot automatic mounting . here detail : 1.file server ( 172.18.1.10 ) sharring path = home so : //172.18.1.10/home login with PDC authentic ( running in winNT PDC ) 2.linux workstation and have smb installed ( mandrake 9.1 or redhat 9.0 ) mount to /mnt/filesharing 3.i want mount with linux ws every boot with one login ( exs: datasharing pass:data ) . i try with this : [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# smbclient //172.18.1.10/home/ -U datasharing added interface ip=172.18.18.14 bcast=172.18.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 session request to 172.18.13.111 failed (Called name not present) session request to 172 failed (Called name not present) Password: Domain=[UB-NET] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[Samba] RE: Re: Re: My details Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] was quarantined because it contained banned content. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: Re: Re: My details
An e-mail you sent to the following recipients was infected with a virus and was not delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MessageID: T648bb7e8f00a0802745e8 Subject: Re: Re: My details Attachment: SMTP Messages: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. SMTP Messages: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. SMTP Messages: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. Recognise Executables: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Threat: 'W32/Sobig-F' detected by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Restricted File Types by extension: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'your_document.pif'. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Executables by byte pattern: 'ItemLength.GE.0'. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Antivirus Content Scanner: Scanned by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Recognise Text: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Incoming Profanity: The operation completed successfully. Scenarios/Incoming/Block Email containing unsafe script commands: The operation completed successfully. Please determine and clean the source of the virus before resending an attachment. (smpnote3) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba-LDAP Howto
Hi all, For those of you who speak French, I've writtent a small Samba 2.2.8a/Ldap Howto. It's available on my website : http://www.martymac.com (Avoid the html format still the conversion isn't really perfect !). I hope this document will help you :) Regards, Ganaël LAPLANCHE. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Join DOM_A with user validation on DOM_B?
Using version 2.2.8a. I want my server to be a member of domain DOM_A while user validation is done on domain DOM_B. So for example user DOM_B\someuser can connect to MYSERVER that is a member of DOM_A. Something like: smbpasswd -j DOM_B (or should it be smbpasswd -j DOM_A?) [global] workgroup = DOM_A netbios name = MYSERVER security = DOMAIN password server = PDC_B, BDC_B I cannot seem to get this working... Is this possible? Thanks, Simon. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
