Re: [Samba] problem adding windows machines to domain - user root not found
Matt Singerman a écrit : Hello all, hi there, I am trying to add a Windows XP machine to a domain controlled by a Samba 3 server. The problem is, when I try to add it, I get the follownig error: First, are you using winXP pro ? as XP familycan't join a domain. Your computer could not be joined to the domain because the follownig error occured: The user name could not be found. I am using the username root and the root samba password. I even changed root's samba password to make sure I was using the correct one: Check your samba version according to this announcement: quote from (samba.org) (8th May, 2004) /Samba 3.0.4 and 2.2.9 Available for Download/ The latest patch release of the 3.0 code base, Samba 3.0.4, is available for download in gzipped format http://sambafr.idealx.org/samba/ftp/samba-3.0.4.tar.gz. The GPG signature http://sambafr.idealx.org/samba/ftp/samba-3.0.4.tar.asc is for the uncompressed tarball. This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixed since the 3.0.3 release, the most visible of which is the problem with user password changes after applying the Microsoft security hotfix described in KB828741 to Windows NT 4.0/200x/XP clients. Please refer to the Release Notes http://sambafr.idealx.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.4.html for descriptions of the exact changes and new features. Hope it helps. G.G / TMI-Concept. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] please help: smbd 100% cpu usage
so here we go, atatched (gziped - i tougt that it would be no good idea to paste 180KB here) there is the level 10 log. the machine names are: samba server: linux windows ME: norbert perhaps some can suggest a solution ... TIA matthias --On Freitag, Juni 18, 2004 08:01:45 -0400 Jason C. Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Set your log level to 10 and then send us the log for smbd and the | machine name. Maybe that will tell us something. | | Jason | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | hi, | | i've a problem with samba 3.0.2. there is one windows ME client which | used to work with out any problems. now, as soon as the user connects | (sharelevel: user, or share - i've tried both) on smbd is forked which | causes 90 to 100% cpu load. when i stop samba (smbd/nmbd) this proces | does not die i can only get rid of it whit a kill -9. with this no | data can be transfered from or to the win ME client. | | this is what a level 2 log stats: | | [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(105) | netbios connect: name1=LINUX name2=NORBERT | [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(112) | netbios connect: local=linux remote=norbert, name type = 0 | [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(591) | setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close | all old resources. | [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305) | check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [NORBERT] - [NORBERT] | - [norbert] succeeded | [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705) | norbert (192.168.0.4) connect to service windows initially as user | norbert (uid=1000, gid=1000) (pid 10759) | | and top shows: | | PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND | 10759 norbert 25 0 10856 3652 8924 R 99.2 0.7 0:18.22 smbd | | | any suggestions ? | | TIA -- Matthias Henze[EMAIL PROTECTED] Use PGP!! http://www.mhcsoftware.de/MatthiasHenze.asc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MHC SoftWare GmbH voice: +49-(0)9533-92006-0 Fichtera 17 fax: +49-(0)9533-92006-6 96274 Itzgrund/Germanye-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Log in one server, have shares in another ?
Hi,
I have samba server (2.2.X, migrating to 3.0.4) that authenticates the
users and let them mount their home dir.
I'd like to change that in order to have one server doing the
authentication but the shares actually being accessed in a different
one.
user samba server1/login
samba server2/mount
How can I do that ? My ideai is to concentrate the passwords in samba
server (since it already have the users created) but let them mount
(without having to specifiy anything) the home located in a different
server without having to create again the same user/password in samba
server2
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.2a and MS Access 2002
I think I've seen a few others with similiar issues, but so far no answers that have applied to me. Basically, I have a solaris 8 box with Samba 3.0.2a that serves up all my windows printers. All printers for windows are configured in cups 1.1.20 as raw queues and I have point and print setup to push drivers to all the users. I'm not having issues with any other office apps, but Access 2002 is having trouble. When users open a database and try to print, Access 2002 fails to detect the default printer. They have to select a printer from the file menu and then this printer becomes the default printer for all users (which is a problem as users are on different floors and have to constantly change the printer). I know this seems like a small issue, but it's one of the last unexpected hurdles we have and we'd like to make our users happy. How can we make access 2002 detect a users default printer like ALL the other apps do. -Tim How many people here have telekenetic powers? Raise my hand. -Emo Philips - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Huge delays on login/first access from WinXP clients on samba 3.0.4 PDC
Dear Samba citizens, what kind of further information I can provide to get this tracked down? This behavior really renders the samba domain controller service useless here, but WinXP workgrouping is not an option. As another data point, w2k also doesn't suffer from this problem. Sorry for all this whining.. Regards, Pete Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: Hi *, after upgrade from 2.2.8a to 3.0.4, I'm suffering from ~10 min. delays on login/first access of a share from a WinXPpro client to a samba 3.0.4 PDC (SuSE 9.0). This is printed in the logs: [2004/06/16 11:58:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 11:59:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:00:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:01:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:02:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:03:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:04:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:05:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:06:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:07:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:08:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) This effect doesn't happen with Win98SE as a domain client, or with a WinXPpro client in workgroup mode. The samba packages are from the ftp.suse.com/project/samba. I've tried to rejoin this XPpro client under a new name, with no effect. After dismount these delays, it works as expected :-(. From reading the migration section in the HOWTO-Collection, I added a add machine script with the same value as add user script to smb.conf. Any hints are highly appreciated. TIA, Pete -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Log in one server, have shares in another ?
Once you go to samba 3 there is a parameter that allows you to specify the home dir location. Use the pdbedit command to change the homedir parameter. To use the same password data as the logon server, you can join your second workstation to the domain and use security=domain. Make sure that your unix IDs are synced as well, either manually or by using a network directory like LDAP or NIS. Mario Bittencourt wrote: Hi, I have samba server (2.2.X, migrating to 3.0.4) that authenticates the users and let them mount their home dir. I'd like to change that in order to have one server doing the authentication but the shares actually being accessed in a different one. user samba server1/login samba server2/mount How can I do that ? My ideai is to concentrate the passwords in samba server (since it already have the users created) but let them mount (without having to specifiy anything) the home located in a different server without having to create again the same user/password in samba server2 -- Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Cell: 701-306-6254 Information Systems Consultant Fax: 701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Huge delays on login/first access from WinXP clients on samba 3.0.4 PDC
Have you checked the firewall on the XP boxes? Make sure it's off. Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: Dear Samba citizens, what kind of further information I can provide to get this tracked down? This behavior really renders the samba domain controller service useless here, but WinXP workgrouping is not an option. As another data point, w2k also doesn't suffer from this problem. Sorry for all this whining.. Regards, Pete Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: Hi *, after upgrade from 2.2.8a to 3.0.4, I'm suffering from ~10 min. delays on login/first access of a share from a WinXPpro client to a samba 3.0.4 PDC (SuSE 9.0). This is printed in the logs: [2004/06/16 11:58:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 11:59:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:00:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:01:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:02:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:03:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:04:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:05:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:06:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:07:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:08:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) This effect doesn't happen with Win98SE as a domain client, or with a WinXPpro client in workgroup mode. The samba packages are from the ftp.suse.com/project/samba. I've tried to rejoin this XPpro client under a new name, with no effect. After dismount these delays, it works as expected :-(. From reading the migration section in the HOWTO-Collection, I added a add machine script with the same value as add user script to smb.conf. Any hints are highly appreciated. TIA, Pete -- Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Cell: 701-306-6254 Information Systems Consultant Fax: 701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Is this possible? (syncing users between a system with samba 3 on and a win2k3 server)
Okay, first a bit of background... It looks as though I'm going to be getting a consulting job soon to replace a guy at a company, turns out he has done something of a poor job (for example the router login is accessible from the outside, any ip etc). Now, the main server at this company is running Windows 2003 Server (SBS possibly) it also acts as the email server etc I plan to separate things a bit at the company and dedicate such tasks to separate servers, one for email, one for webserver etc. (they had a hard disk failure recently, the current guy didn't do the tape backups correctly and so they lost email, webserver and pdc). At the moment I plan to setup a linux system (either debian or gentoo.. Love those compile times) for the email server (postfix or qmail.. Probably postfix I have more experience with that) and have the users use imap to access their email internally and setup squirrelmail so they can access their work email at home. (some users often do work at home) Here is what I want to do: Whenever a new user (or any other currently existing users) are created on the win 2k3 server they are replicated on the email server (same username password) automatically. Is it possible to do this with Samba? It's mostly because they'll be a good number of currently existing users on the win 2k3 server and so when I setup the email server I don't want to be creating a very large number of users, I'd much rather it was totally automated. Sorry about this being a bit long, I tried to shorten it. Thanks Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Is this possible? (syncing users between a system with samba 3 on and a win2k3 server)
Mark Casey wrote: Okay, first a bit of background... It looks as though I'm going to be getting a consulting job soon to replace a guy at a company, turns out he has done something of a poor job (for example the router login is accessible from the outside, any ip etc). Now, the main server at this company is running Windows 2003 Server (SBS possibly) it also acts as the email server etc If this is SBS, you may want to rethink your strategy. SBS is designed to be AD controller and exchange for a company. I don't believe it will either join an existing domain or allow any other DCs in a AD tree either, so beware. At the moment I plan to setup a linux system (either debian or gentoo.. Love those compile times) A word about being a hired gun (that is, a consultant), if you're not going to be hand holding these systems, maybe you should do the company a favor and not use a custom built distro... Gentoo is fine if it's your personal box, but in a situation where somebody else may have to install a program, etc, try to go more mainstream. If there's somebody with any knowlege at the place and they want to update the systems, it's a lot better if you can hand them a book on insert favorite off the shelf distro and say go to town rather than say 'read the entire gentoo installation howto and jump right in. You may even get asked to come back for the serious upgrade/maintenance rather than getting cursed off the property (or sued for shoddy work) if they have to ask you to come back for every little thing. Try to leave the place in better shape, and more maintainable than you came in or you're doing all of us consultants a disservice. But I digress... Here is what I want to do: Whenever a new user (or any other currently existing users) are created on the win 2k3 server they are replicated on the email server (same username password) automatically. Is it possible to do this with Samba? Maybe what you really want to do is have your samba server be the DC and the w2k3 server simply be a member of its domain. Then you have your unix uids for email and logins. You'll have to run winbind if you're leaving windows as the DC, and that 'can' be a PITA in some cases. You can use various methods to transfer login information to the samba passdb, but there will be some manual labor involved. It's mostly because they'll be a good number of currently existing users on the win 2k3 server and so when I setup the email server I don't want to be creating a very large number of users, I'd much rather it was totally automated. Sorry about this being a bit long, I tried to shorten it. Thanks Mark -- Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Cell: 701-306-6254 Information Systems Consultant Fax: 701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Is this possible? (syncing users between a system withsamba 3 on and a win2k3 server)
Well, the gentoo mention was a joke. (the loving compile times remark) Are there any good books on the subject dealing with what I mentioned, as I haven't used Samba for a few years. (probably pre 2.0) Anyway, if I do setup any *bsd or linux servers they will be dedicated to the task and will not have any additional programs installed. I would most likely leave the win2k3 server as the PDC, I have heard of some issues in the past dealing with Samba and it being a PDC. The situation is that I want to apply the practice of least change, I don't want to (or feel the network needs to) have a new domain controller.. Having all machines join the new domain etc. So, SBS won't allow a BDC? (suppose I'll have to go and buy it then do some tests in vmware) What're saying is that it isn't possible currently with Samba 3 to replicate users from win 2k3? (without some manual work, is it possible at all to script any of it?) Thanks Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Huge delays on login/first access from WinXP clients on samba 3.0.4 PDC
I have a winxp slowdown problem which seems to go away when I turn iptables off. My situation is different, but it's a worth a shot just to see. I get a 20 sec directory listing delay with WinXP only, Win2k is fine, and it only happens intermittantly. /R Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: Dear Samba citizens, what kind of further information I can provide to get this tracked down? This behavior really renders the samba domain controller service useless here, but WinXP workgrouping is not an option. As another data point, w2k also doesn't suffer from this problem. Sorry for all this whining.. Regards, Pete Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: Hi *, after upgrade from 2.2.8a to 3.0.4, I'm suffering from ~10 min. delays on login/first access of a share from a WinXPpro client to a samba 3.0.4 PDC (SuSE 9.0). This is printed in the logs: [2004/06/16 11:58:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 11:59:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:00:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:01:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:02:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:03:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:04:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:05:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:06:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:07:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:08:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) This effect doesn't happen with Win98SE as a domain client, or with a WinXPpro client in workgroup mode. The samba packages are from the ftp.suse.com/project/samba. I've tried to rejoin this XPpro client under a new name, with no effect. After dismount these delays, it works as expected :-(. From reading the migration section in the HOWTO-Collection, I added a add machine script with the same value as add user script to smb.conf. Any hints are highly appreciated. TIA, Pete -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] lmhosts
when using lmhosts to connect to a netword accross the internet is there away to view the folders graphicaly instead of using smbclient //server/share? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Repost: group membership limitations and Linux kernel
Might be a weird question but here goes, I work for IBM and we are trying to find out what the acronym RBNA stands for. A google search comes up with very few hits but your email is attached to one of them. Are you in the AIX / UNIX industry and if so RBNA ? can you give me a little explanation. If I have made an error in sending this to you, sorry to take your time. Thank you, Jason M. Hutchinson pSeries Advanced Support International Business Machines, Inc. 1177 Beltline Road 77-1177-2009C Coppell, TX 75019 Phone: 469-549-8182, Fax: 469-549-8140, Tie: 4828183 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Huge delays on login/first access from WinXP clients on samba 3.0.4 PDC
You may want to check your webclient service status. A lot of people suggest going and disabling the service on the clients, but if you've got a big shop then that's a huge PITA. I suggest popping up a simple, no-frills webserver on your PDC. What that solves is that when a machine comes asking for something on port 80 from the fileserver, your server responds 'I don't have it' and the client goes merrily along with what it 'should' be doing. This way you don't have to reconfigure every new install and things still go fast. Randy S wrote: I have a winxp slowdown problem which seems to go away when I turn iptables off. My situation is different, but it's a worth a shot just to see. I get a 20 sec directory listing delay with WinXP only, Win2k is fine, and it only happens intermittantly. /R Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: Dear Samba citizens, what kind of further information I can provide to get this tracked down? This behavior really renders the samba domain controller service useless here, but WinXP workgrouping is not an option. As another data point, w2k also doesn't suffer from this problem. Sorry for all this whining.. Regards, Pete Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: Hi *, after upgrade from 2.2.8a to 3.0.4, I'm suffering from ~10 min. delays on login/first access of a share from a WinXPpro client to a samba 3.0.4 PDC (SuSE 9.0). This is printed in the logs: [2004/06/16 11:58:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 11:59:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:00:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:01:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:02:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:03:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:04:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:05:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:06:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:07:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/16 12:08:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) This effect doesn't happen with Win98SE as a domain client, or with a WinXPpro client in workgroup mode. The samba packages are from the ftp.suse.com/project/samba. I've tried to rejoin this XPpro client under a new name, with no effect. After dismount these delays, it works as expected :-(. From reading the migration section in the HOWTO-Collection, I added a add machine script with the same value as add user script to smb.conf. Any hints are highly appreciated. TIA, Pete -- Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Cell: 701-306-6254 Information Systems Consultant Fax: 701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: XP Pro Autheticate to Samba 3.0 PDC fails: Access is
Erich Enke, You Deserve Many Thanks. THANK YOU - THANK YOU - THANK YOU .. I have read everything I could find - including log level 4 messages, and source code.. I now have XP on my Linux Samba 3 domain. wb -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
svn commit: samba r1198 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: include lib libads libcli libcli/auth libcli/raw libcli/util passdb smbd utils
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-06-19 08:15:41 + (Sat, 19 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1198 Added: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/clikrb5.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/kerberos.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/kerberos.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/kerberos_verify.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.h Removed: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libads/kerberos.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libads/kerberos_verify.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw/clikrb5.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw/clispnego.c Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/include/ads.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/include/includes.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/basic.mk branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/util_str.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libads/config.m4 branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/config.m4 branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/util/asn1.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/passdb/secrets.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smbd/config.mk branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/config.m4 branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/config.mk branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/ntlm_auth.c Log: Merge the Samba 3.0 ntlm_auth, including the kerberos and SPENGO parts. I have moved the SPNEGO and Kerberos code into libcli/auth, and intend to refactor them into the same format as NTLMSSP. Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=1198nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1199 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-06-20 00:54:17 + (Sun, 20 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1199 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/talloc.c Log: Make talloc_asprintf_append() work on a NULL source string as if it were just a alloc_asprintf(). (makes it easier to use in a loop) Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1199nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1200 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: include libcli libcli/auth libcli/util librpc/rpc utils
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-06-20 00:58:09 + (Sun, 20 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1200 Added: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec_ntlmssp.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego_parse.c Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/include/includes.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/ntlmssp.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/config.m4 branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/util/asn1.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_auth.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_ntlm.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_schannel.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/ntlm_auth.c Log: Add 'gensec', our generic security layer. This layer is used for DCERPC security, as well as ntlm_auth at this time. It expect things like SASL and the CIFS layer to use it as well. The particular purpose of this layer is to introduce SPENGO, which needs generic access to the actual implementation mechanisms. Schannel, due to it's 'interesting' setup properties is in GENSEC, but is only in the RPC code. Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=1200nolog=1
