Re: [Samba] problem adding windows machines to domain - user root not found

2004-06-19 Thread TMI-Concept
Matt Singerman a écrit :
Hello all,
 

hi there,
I am trying to add a Windows XP machine to a domain controlled by a Samba 3 
server.  The problem is, when I try to add it, I get the follownig error:

 

First, are you using winXP pro ? as  XP familycan't join a domain.
Your computer could not be joined to the domain because the follownig error 
occured:

The user name could not be found.
I am using the username root and the root samba password.  I even changed 
root's samba password to make sure I was using the correct one:

 

Check your samba version according to this announcement:
quote from (samba.org)
(8th May, 2004) /Samba 3.0.4 and 2.2.9 Available for Download/
The latest patch release of the 3.0 code base, Samba 3.0.4, is 
available for download in gzipped format 
http://sambafr.idealx.org/samba/ftp/samba-3.0.4.tar.gz. The GPG 
signature http://sambafr.idealx.org/samba/ftp/samba-3.0.4.tar.asc is 
for the uncompressed tarball. This is the latest stable release of 
Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be 
running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixed 
since the 3.0.3 release, the most visible of which is the problem with 
user password changes after applying the Microsoft security hotfix 
described in KB828741 to Windows NT 4.0/200x/XP clients. Please refer to 
the Release Notes 
http://sambafr.idealx.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.4.html for 
descriptions of the exact changes and new features.

Hope it helps.
G.G / TMI-Concept.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] please help: smbd 100% cpu usage

2004-06-19 Thread lists
so here we go, atatched (gziped - i tougt that it would be no good idea to 
paste 180KB here) there is the level 10 log. the machine names are:

samba server: linux
windows ME:   norbert
perhaps some can suggest a solution ...
TIA
matthias
--On Freitag, Juni 18, 2004 08:01:45 -0400 Jason C. Waters 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

| Set your log level to 10 and then send us the log for smbd and the
| machine name.  Maybe that will tell us something.
|
| Jason
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|  hi,
| 
|  i've a problem with samba 3.0.2. there is one windows ME client which
|  used to work with out any problems. now, as soon as the user connects
|  (sharelevel: user, or share - i've tried both) on smbd is forked which
|  causes 90 to 100% cpu load. when i stop samba (smbd/nmbd) this proces
|  does not die i can only get rid of it whit a kill -9. with this no
|  data can be transfered from or to the win ME client.
| 
|  this is what a level 2 log stats:
| 
|  [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(105)
|   netbios connect: name1=LINUX   name2=NORBERT
|  [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(112)
|   netbios connect: local=linux remote=norbert, name type = 0
|  [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(591)
|   setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close
|  all old resources.
|  [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305)
|   check_ntlm_password:  authentication for user [NORBERT] - [NORBERT]
|  - [norbert] succeeded
|  [2004/06/16 16:28:44, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705)
|   norbert (192.168.0.4) connect to service windows initially as user
|  norbert (uid=1000, gid=1000) (pid 10759)
| 
|  and top shows:
| 
|   PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
|  10759 norbert   25   0 10856 3652 8924 R 99.2  0.7   0:18.22 smbd
| 
| 
|  any suggestions ?
| 
|  TIA

--
Matthias Henze[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use PGP!! http://www.mhcsoftware.de/MatthiasHenze.asc
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MHC SoftWare GmbH  voice: +49-(0)9533-92006-0
Fichtera 17  fax: +49-(0)9533-92006-6
96274 Itzgrund/Germanye-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Log in one server, have shares in another ?

2004-06-19 Thread Mario Bittencourt
Hi,  

I have samba server (2.2.X, migrating to 3.0.4) that authenticates the
users and let them mount their home dir.

I'd like to change that in order to have one server doing the
authentication but the shares actually being accessed in a different
one.


user  samba server1/login
    samba server2/mount

How can I do that ?  My ideai is to concentrate the passwords in samba
server (since it already have the users created) but let them mount
(without having to specifiy anything) the home located in a different
server without having to create again the same user/password in samba
server2
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba 3.0.2a and MS Access 2002

2004-06-19 Thread Tim Russell
I think I've seen a few others with similiar issues, but so far no answers that have 
applied to me.
 
Basically, I have a solaris 8 box with Samba 3.0.2a that serves up all my windows 
printers. All printers for windows are configured in cups 1.1.20 as raw queues and I 
have point and print setup to push drivers to all the users.
 
I'm not having issues with any other office apps, but Access 2002 is having trouble. 
When users open a database and try to print, Access 2002 fails to detect the default 
printer. They have to select a printer from the file menu and then this printer 
becomes the default printer for all users (which is a problem as users are on 
different floors and have to constantly change the printer).
 
I know this seems like a small issue, but it's one of the last unexpected hurdles we 
have and we'd like to make our users happy. How can we make access 2002 detect a users 
default printer like ALL the other apps do.
 
-Tim


How many people here have telekenetic powers? Raise my hand.
-Emo Philips

-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: Huge delays on login/first access from WinXP clients on samba 3.0.4 PDC

2004-06-19 Thread Hans-Peter Jansen
Dear Samba citizens,

what kind of further information I can provide to get this tracked down?
This behavior really renders the samba domain controller service useless
here, but WinXP workgrouping is not an option. As another data point, w2k
also doesn't suffer from this problem.

Sorry for all this whining..

Regards,
Pete

Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:

 Hi *,
 
 after upgrade from 2.2.8a to 3.0.4, I'm suffering from ~10 min. delays
 on login/first access of a share from a WinXPpro client to a samba 3.0.4
 PDC (SuSE 9.0). This is printed in the logs:
 
 [2004/06/16 11:58:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 11:59:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 12:00:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 12:01:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 12:02:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 12:03:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 12:04:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 12:05:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 12:06:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 12:07:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/06/16 12:08:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 
 This effect doesn't happen with Win98SE as a domain client, or with a
 WinXPpro client in workgroup mode.
 
 The samba packages are from the ftp.suse.com/project/samba.
 
 I've tried to rejoin this XPpro client under a new name, with no effect.
 After dismount these delays, it works as expected :-(.
 
From reading the migration section in the HOWTO-Collection, I added a
 add machine script with the same value as add user script
 to smb.conf.
 
 Any hints are highly appreciated.
 
 TIA,
 Pete


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Log in one server, have shares in another ?

2004-06-19 Thread Paul Gienger
Once you go to samba 3 there is a parameter that allows you to specify 
the home dir location.  Use the pdbedit command to change the homedir 
parameter.

To use the same password data as the logon server, you can join your 
second workstation to the domain and use security=domain.  Make sure 
that your unix IDs are synced as well, either manually or by using a 
network directory like LDAP or NIS.

Mario Bittencourt wrote:
Hi,  

I have samba server (2.2.X, migrating to 3.0.4) that authenticates the
users and let them mount their home dir.
I'd like to change that in order to have one server doing the
authentication but the shares actually being accessed in a different
one.
user  samba server1/login
   samba server2/mount
How can I do that ?  My ideai is to concentrate the passwords in samba
server (since it already have the users created) but let them mount
(without having to specifiy anything) the home located in a different
server without having to create again the same user/password in samba
server2
 

--
Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884
Applied Engineering Inc. Cell:  701-306-6254
Information Systems Consultant   Fax:   701-281-1322
URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: Huge delays on login/first access from WinXP clients on samba 3.0.4 PDC

2004-06-19 Thread Paul Gienger
Have you checked the firewall on the XP boxes?  Make sure it's off.
Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Dear Samba citizens,
what kind of further information I can provide to get this tracked down?
This behavior really renders the samba domain controller service useless
here, but WinXP workgrouping is not an option. As another data point, w2k
also doesn't suffer from this problem.
Sorry for all this whining..
Regards,
Pete
Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
 

Hi *,
after upgrade from 2.2.8a to 3.0.4, I'm suffering from ~10 min. delays
on login/first access of a share from a WinXPpro client to a samba 3.0.4
PDC (SuSE 9.0). This is printed in the logs:
[2004/06/16 11:58:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 11:59:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:00:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:01:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:02:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:03:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:04:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:05:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:06:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:07:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:08:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
This effect doesn't happen with Win98SE as a domain client, or with a
WinXPpro client in workgroup mode.
The samba packages are from the ftp.suse.com/project/samba.
I've tried to rejoin this XPpro client under a new name, with no effect.
After dismount these delays, it works as expected :-(.
From reading the migration section in the HOWTO-Collection, I added a
add machine script with the same value as add user script
to smb.conf.
Any hints are highly appreciated.
TIA,
Pete
   


 

--
Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884
Applied Engineering Inc. Cell:  701-306-6254
Information Systems Consultant   Fax:   701-281-1322
URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Is this possible? (syncing users between a system with samba 3 on and a win2k3 server)

2004-06-19 Thread Mark Casey
Okay, first a bit of background...

It looks as though I'm going to be getting a consulting job soon to replace
a guy at a company, turns out he has done something of a poor job (for
example the router login is accessible from the outside, any ip etc).

Now, the main server at this company is running Windows 2003 Server (SBS
possibly) it also acts as the email server etc
I plan to separate things a bit at the company and dedicate such tasks to
separate servers, one for email, one for webserver etc. (they had a hard
disk failure recently, the current guy didn't do the tape backups correctly
and so they lost email, webserver and pdc).
At the moment I plan to setup a linux system (either debian or gentoo.. Love
those compile times) for the email server (postfix or qmail.. Probably
postfix I have more experience with that) and have the users use imap to
access their email internally and setup squirrelmail so they can access
their work email at home. (some users often do work at home)


Here is what I want to do:

Whenever a new user (or any other currently existing users) are created on
the win 2k3 server they are replicated on the email server (same username 
password) automatically.

Is it possible to do this with Samba?

It's mostly because they'll be a good number of currently existing users on
the win 2k3 server and so when I setup the email server I don't want to be
creating a very large number of users, I'd much rather it was totally
automated.

Sorry about this being a bit long, I tried to shorten it.


Thanks

Mark

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Is this possible? (syncing users between a system with samba 3 on and a win2k3 server)

2004-06-19 Thread Paul Gienger

Mark Casey wrote:
Okay, first a bit of background...
It looks as though I'm going to be getting a consulting job soon to replace
a guy at a company, turns out he has done something of a poor job (for
example the router login is accessible from the outside, any ip etc).
Now, the main server at this company is running Windows 2003 Server (SBS
possibly) it also acts as the email server etc
 

If this is SBS, you may want to rethink your strategy.  SBS is designed 
to be AD controller and exchange for a company.  I don't believe it will 
either join an existing domain or allow any other DCs in a AD tree 
either, so beware.

At the moment I plan to setup a linux system (either debian or gentoo.. Love
those compile times) 
 

A word about being a hired gun (that is, a consultant), if you're not 
going to be hand holding these systems, maybe you should do the company 
a favor and not use a custom built distro... Gentoo is fine if it's your 
personal box, but in a situation where somebody else may have to install 
a program, etc,  try to go more mainstream.  If there's somebody with 
any knowlege at the place and they want to update the systems, it's a 
lot better if you can hand them a book on insert favorite off the shelf 
distro and say go to town rather than say 'read the entire gentoo 
installation howto and jump right in.  You may even get asked to come 
back for the serious upgrade/maintenance rather than getting cursed off 
the property (or sued for shoddy work) if they have to ask you to come 
back for every little thing.  Try to leave the place in better shape, 
and more maintainable than you came in or you're doing all of us 
consultants a disservice.  But I digress...

Here is what I want to do:
Whenever a new user (or any other currently existing users) are created on
the win 2k3 server they are replicated on the email server (same username 
password) automatically.
Is it possible to do this with Samba?
 

Maybe what you really want to do is have your samba server be the DC and 
the w2k3 server simply be a member of its domain.  Then you have your 
unix uids for email and logins.  You'll have to run winbind if you're 
leaving windows as the DC, and that 'can' be a PITA in some cases.  You 
can use various methods to transfer login information to the samba 
passdb, but there will be some manual labor involved.

It's mostly because they'll be a good number of currently existing users on
the win 2k3 server and so when I setup the email server I don't want to be
creating a very large number of users, I'd much rather it was totally
automated.
Sorry about this being a bit long, I tried to shorten it.
Thanks
Mark
 

--
Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884
Applied Engineering Inc. Cell:  701-306-6254
Information Systems Consultant   Fax:   701-281-1322
URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Is this possible? (syncing users between a system withsamba 3 on and a win2k3 server)

2004-06-19 Thread Mark Casey
Well, the gentoo mention was a joke. (the loving compile times remark)

Are there any good books on the subject dealing with what I mentioned, as I
haven't used Samba for a few years. (probably pre 2.0)

Anyway, if I do setup any *bsd or linux servers they will be dedicated to
the task and will not have any additional programs installed.

I would most likely leave the win2k3 server as the PDC, I have heard of some
issues in the past dealing with Samba and it being a PDC.
The situation is that I want to apply the practice of least change, I don't
want to (or feel the network needs to) have a new domain controller.. Having
all machines join the new domain etc.

So, SBS won't allow a BDC?  (suppose I'll have to go and buy it then do some
tests in vmware)

What're saying is that it isn't possible currently with Samba 3 to replicate
users from win 2k3? (without some manual work, is it possible at all to
script any of it?)

Thanks

Mark

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: Huge delays on login/first access from WinXP clients on samba 3.0.4 PDC

2004-06-19 Thread Randy S
I have a winxp slowdown problem which seems to go away when I turn 
iptables off. My situation is different, but it's a worth a shot just to 
see. I get a 20 sec directory listing delay with WinXP only, Win2k is 
fine, and it only happens intermittantly.

/R
Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Dear Samba citizens,
what kind of further information I can provide to get this tracked down?
This behavior really renders the samba domain controller service useless
here, but WinXP workgrouping is not an option. As another data point, w2k
also doesn't suffer from this problem.
Sorry for all this whining..
Regards,
Pete
Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:

Hi *,
after upgrade from 2.2.8a to 3.0.4, I'm suffering from ~10 min. delays
on login/first access of a share from a WinXPpro client to a samba 3.0.4
PDC (SuSE 9.0). This is printed in the logs:
[2004/06/16 11:58:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 11:59:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:00:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:01:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:02:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:03:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:04:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:05:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:06:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:07:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:08:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
This effect doesn't happen with Win98SE as a domain client, or with a
WinXPpro client in workgroup mode.
The samba packages are from the ftp.suse.com/project/samba.
I've tried to rejoin this XPpro client under a new name, with no effect.
After dismount these delays, it works as expected :-(.
From reading the migration section in the HOWTO-Collection, I added a
add machine script with the same value as add user script
to smb.conf.
Any hints are highly appreciated.
TIA,
Pete


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] lmhosts

2004-06-19 Thread Mike
when using lmhosts to connect to a netword accross the internet is there 
away to view the folders graphicaly instead of using smbclient 
//server/share?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Repost: group membership limitations and Linux kernel

2004-06-19 Thread Jason Hutchinson
Might be a weird question but here goes,  I work for IBM and we are trying 
to find out what the acronym RBNA stands for.  A google search comes up 
with very few hits  but your email is attached to one of them.  Are you in 
the AIX / UNIX industry and if so RBNA ?   can you give me a little 
explanation.

If I have made an error in sending this to you, sorry to take your time.



Thank you,
Jason M. Hutchinson

pSeries Advanced Support
International Business Machines, Inc.
1177 Beltline Road
77-1177-2009C
Coppell, TX  75019
Phone:  469-549-8182, Fax: 469-549-8140, Tie: 4828183
E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: Huge delays on login/first access from WinXP clients on samba 3.0.4 PDC

2004-06-19 Thread Paul Gienger
You may want to check your webclient service status.  A lot of people 
suggest going and disabling the service on the clients, but if you've 
got a big shop then that's a huge PITA.  I suggest popping up a simple, 
no-frills webserver on your PDC.  What that solves is that when a 
machine comes asking for something on port 80 from the fileserver, your 
server responds 'I don't have it' and the client goes merrily along with 
what it 'should' be doing.  This way you don't have to reconfigure every 
new install and things still go fast.

Randy S wrote:
I have a winxp slowdown problem which seems to go away when I turn 
iptables off. My situation is different, but it's a worth a shot just 
to see. I get a 20 sec directory listing delay with WinXP only, Win2k 
is fine, and it only happens intermittantly.

/R
Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Dear Samba citizens,
what kind of further information I can provide to get this tracked down?
This behavior really renders the samba domain controller service useless
here, but WinXP workgrouping is not an option. As another data point, 
w2k
also doesn't suffer from this problem.

Sorry for all this whining..
Regards,
Pete
Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:

Hi *,
after upgrade from 2.2.8a to 3.0.4, I'm suffering from ~10 min. delays
on login/first access of a share from a WinXPpro client to a samba 
3.0.4
PDC (SuSE 9.0). This is printed in the logs:

[2004/06/16 11:58:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 11:59:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:00:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:01:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:02:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:03:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:04:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:05:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:06:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:07:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/06/16 12:08:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
This effect doesn't happen with Win98SE as a domain client, or with a
WinXPpro client in workgroup mode.
The samba packages are from the ftp.suse.com/project/samba.
I've tried to rejoin this XPpro client under a new name, with no 
effect.
After dismount these delays, it works as expected :-(.

From reading the migration section in the HOWTO-Collection, I added a
add machine script with the same value as add user script
to smb.conf.
Any hints are highly appreciated.
TIA,
Pete


--
Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884
Applied Engineering Inc. Cell:  701-306-6254
Information Systems Consultant   Fax:   701-281-1322
URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: XP Pro Autheticate to Samba 3.0 PDC fails: Access is

2004-06-19 Thread Otelco
Erich Enke,

You Deserve Many Thanks.

THANK YOU - THANK YOU - THANK YOU ..
I have read everything I could find - including log level 4 messages, and source 
code..


I now have XP on my Linux Samba 3 domain.

wb


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


svn commit: samba r1198 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: include lib libads libcli libcli/auth libcli/raw libcli/util passdb smbd utils

2004-06-19 Thread abartlet
Author: abartlet
Date: 2004-06-19 08:15:41 + (Sat, 19 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1198

Added:
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/clikrb5.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/kerberos.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/kerberos.h
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/kerberos_verify.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.h
Removed:
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libads/kerberos.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libads/kerberos_verify.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw/clikrb5.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw/clispnego.c
Modified:
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/include/ads.h
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/include/includes.h
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/basic.mk
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/util_str.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libads/config.m4
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/config.m4
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/util/asn1.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/passdb/secrets.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smbd/config.mk
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/config.m4
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/config.mk
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/ntlm_auth.c
Log:
Merge the Samba 3.0 ntlm_auth, including the kerberos and SPENGO parts.

I have moved the SPNEGO and Kerberos code into libcli/auth, and intend
to refactor them into the same format as NTLMSSP.

Andrew Bartlett



WebSVN: 
http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=1198nolog=1


svn commit: samba r1199 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib

2004-06-19 Thread abartlet
Author: abartlet
Date: 2004-06-20 00:54:17 + (Sun, 20 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1199

Modified:
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/talloc.c
Log:
Make talloc_asprintf_append() work on a NULL source string as if it were
just a alloc_asprintf().

(makes it easier to use in a loop)

Andrew Bartlett


WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1199nolog=1


svn commit: samba r1200 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: include libcli libcli/auth libcli/util librpc/rpc utils

2004-06-19 Thread abartlet
Author: abartlet
Date: 2004-06-20 00:58:09 + (Sun, 20 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1200

Added:
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec.h
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec_ntlmssp.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego_parse.c
Modified:
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/include/includes.h
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/ntlmssp.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.h
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/config.m4
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/util/asn1.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc.h
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_auth.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_ntlm.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_schannel.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/ntlm_auth.c
Log:
Add 'gensec', our generic security layer.

This layer is used for DCERPC security, as well as ntlm_auth at this
time.  It expect things like SASL and the CIFS layer to use it as
well.

The particular purpose of this layer is to introduce SPENGO, which
needs generic access to the actual implementation mechanisms.

Schannel, due to it's 'interesting' setup properties is in GENSEC, but
is only in the RPC code.

Andrew Bartlett


WebSVN: 
http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=1200nolog=1