[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Permanent delivery failure -- Your message has encountered permanent delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Failed all retries, giving up -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:30:12 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hello Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:26:25 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="document.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="document.zip" UEsDBAoAAAwn8DJXod8lU7YAAFO2AAAMZG9jdW1lbnQuc2NyTVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwA AExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA 4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCgAQAAAEAAABACAAAE AAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQAAAQEAAA K8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA4AAA4C5yc3Jj ADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxEIABwAQQgAA/wEA AAABAQEABBBAAKXDQgDxw0IA9MNCAALEQgDdw0IAfAcAAMQLAAD8D0AAScNC AEvDQgDswUIAyANCAH8DAAAnxEIAbfxBAD3DQgBBvNu3fuurBYMcLS6BIbXf RqGHR595tGShs37iNMaLwFIL3+L1i5RANjQMotVr2xGMwWkGuEhTzcMinFGJR5jMbYdZDhVJZlDB 5qbBzaGzP8SsUkYA/PFwYnpA8zFkXYvzt8sdr+egF0kFeXkdt1EZnj759yDtJ2KOg7iO7IMCpjAY xmh4ZRkgmudn7+evcBjQ6nxzd7PBfOG1rOlFnMYuwzVe9VV5SMllBh3dKLX5RdZQoHKfR3eJsw3a /MLxPWhRft20GP8YB+saiEgQXA4XhOIjboiCvX+vvadPST01tnuEk6+sBo94Tbedrs1BJLJn9iNq XoS8pYgFuPZ0ODFsGsBS7pFrj/zibsvzXyuYt8pmDhXc3lnW0Mg7l6AzLlMQpmpdpSV6/d06+E/2 Gqei+1jmuNk+JKEdKWoUL7DI8hSI1+nVgQZKAnD1OMYO5XFyp9Pk7YA0GFhDWMdNvwrSnyrwyHRN EwMhkLaKjfDK27IwLh+5I/JR1kuYpA3nWAhPUdFV6MjUjLt+OR/PdvLkgdfGx8jRi7I7nU4jI73F kvU+OcSOeYmM9sAkMI/AtrG7tZ8zn3/J4OoHxjtcsLiZXAHQVFmdW+ZA/TjGPn5Be7K8ETM9icsu 1JTxTOiLhd3qnXetTwHybJdsb21O5wsG+8cztw5m6cge77MS9bZ+iPlmEDPZtyhQzJ1N0sY/srCb chwucCouIDZ+njW4w6HvbMKi5OwJ2YY3yvUnpm0jOx+lZd20WlWz0I9OK0ZMzvmfGOsYRjMcQcyj -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Temporary delivery failure -- Your message has encountered temporary delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote server rejected the message content -- A transcript of the session follows -- * Domain MX record lookup succeeded * Attempting connection to mailin-04.mx.aol.com[64.12.138.152] - succeeded <= 220-rly-xn03.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xn3.8; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:17:53 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-xn03.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-01.mx.aol.com[64.12.138.57] - succeeded <= 220-rly-xk01.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xk1.7; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:18:55 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-xk01.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-02.mx.aol.com[64.12.138.89] - succeeded <= 220-rly-xl01.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xl1.5; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:19:56 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-xl01.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-03.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.152] - succeeded <= 220-rly-xi05.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xi5.5; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:20:56 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-xi05.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP => MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => DATA <= 354 START MAIL INPUT, END WITH "." ON A LINE BY ITSELF <= 421-: (DNS:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html <= 421 SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:30:12 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hello Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:26:25 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="document.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="document.zip" UEsDBAoAAAwn8DJXod8lU7YAAFO2AAAMZG9jdW1lbnQuc2NyTVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwA AExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA 4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCgAQAAAEAAABACAAAE AAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQAAAQEAAA K8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA4AAA4C5yc3Jj ADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxEIABwAAA
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Temporary delivery failure -- Your message has encountered temporary delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote server rejected the message content -- A transcript of the session follows -- * Domain MX record lookup succeeded * Attempting connection to mailin-04.mx.aol.com[205.188.157.25] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yj04.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yj4.3; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:13:45 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yj04.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-01.mx.aol.com[205.188.159.57] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yg03.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yg3.8; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:14:50 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yg03.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-02.mx.aol.com[64.12.138.89] - succeeded <= 220-rly-xl06.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xl6.4; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:15:53 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-xl06.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-03.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.152] - succeeded <= 220-rly-xi03.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xi3.9; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:16:46 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-xi03.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP => MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => DATA <= 354 START MAIL INPUT, END WITH "." ON A LINE BY ITSELF <= 421-: (DNS:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html <= 421 SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:30:12 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hello Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:26:25 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="document.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="document.zip" UEsDBAoAAAwn8DJXod8lU7YAAFO2AAAMZG9jdW1lbnQuc2NyTVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwA AExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA 4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCgAQAAAEAAABACAAAE AAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQAAAQEAAA K8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA4AAA4C5yc3Jj ADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxEIABw
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Temporary delivery failure -- Your message has encountered temporary delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote server rejected the message content -- A transcript of the session follows -- * Domain MX record lookup succeeded * Attempting connection to mailin-04.mx.aol.com[64.12.138.185] - succeeded <= 220-rly-xb04.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xb4.1; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:09:46 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-xb04.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-01.mx.aol.com[205.188.159.57] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yg02.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yg2.4; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:10:38 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yg02.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-02.mx.aol.com[205.188.159.217] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yh02.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yh2.4; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:11:36 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yh02.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-03.mx.aol.com[205.188.158.121] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yi01.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yi1.8; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:12:36 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yi01.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP => MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => DATA <= 354 START MAIL INPUT, END WITH "." ON A LINE BY ITSELF <= 421-: (DNS:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html <= 421 SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:30:12 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hello Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:26:25 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="document.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="document.zip" UEsDBAoAAAwn8DJXod8lU7YAAFO2AAAMZG9jdW1lbnQuc2NyTVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwA AExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA 4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCgAQAAAEAAABACAAAE AAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQAAAQEAAA K8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA4AAA4C5yc3Jj ADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxE
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Temporary delivery failure -- Your message has encountered temporary delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote server rejected the message content -- A transcript of the session follows -- * Domain MX record lookup succeeded * Attempting connection to mailin-03.mx.aol.com[205.188.158.121] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yi02.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yi2.9; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:05:46 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yi02.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-04.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.184] - succeeded <= 220-rly-xj06.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xj6.3; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:06:45 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-xj06.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-01.mx.aol.com[205.188.159.57] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yg04.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yg4.3; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:07:34 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yg04.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-02.mx.aol.com[205.188.159.217] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yh01.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yh1.10; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:08:33 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yh01.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP => MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => DATA <= 354 START MAIL INPUT, END WITH "." ON A LINE BY ITSELF <= 421-: (DNS:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html <= 421 SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:30:12 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hello Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:26:25 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="document.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="document.zip" UEsDBAoAAAwn8DJXod8lU7YAAFO2AAAMZG9jdW1lbnQuc2NyTVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwA AExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA 4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCgAQAAAEAAABACAAAE AAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQAAAQEAAA K8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA4AAA4C5yc3Jj ADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsx
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Temporary delivery failure -- Your message has encountered temporary delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote server rejected the message content -- A transcript of the session follows -- * Domain MX record lookup succeeded * Attempting connection to mailin-03.mx.aol.com[205.188.158.121] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yi02.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yi2.8; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:02:19 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yi02.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-04.mx.aol.com[205.188.157.25] - succeeded <= 220-rly-yj03.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yj3.10; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:03:13 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-yj03.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-01.mx.aol.com[205.188.156.185] - succeeded <= 220-rly-ya05.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-ya5.2; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:04:03 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-ya05.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-02.mx.aol.com[64.12.138.89] - succeeded <= 220-rly-xl05.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xl5.5; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:04:55 -0400 <= 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not <= 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer <= 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk <= 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL <= 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which <= 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. => EHLO proxy <= 250-rly-xl05.mx.aol.com peer name unknown <= 250 HELP => MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <= 250 OK => DATA <= 354 START MAIL INPUT, END WITH "." ON A LINE BY ITSELF <= 421-: (DNS:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html <= 421 SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:30:12 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hello Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:26:25 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0002_4E4C70B2.0A2EB09A Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="document.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="document.zip" UEsDBAoAAAwn8DJXod8lU7YAAFO2AAAMZG9jdW1lbnQuc2NyTVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwA AExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA 4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCgAQAAAEAAABACAAAE AAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQAAAQEAAA K8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA4AAA4C5yc3Jj ADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxE
[Samba] Samba + LDAP slave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I just came across the following in the Samba HOWTO: It is important that all LDAP IDMAP clients use only the master LDAP server because the idmap backend facility in the smb.conf file does not correctly handle LDAP redirects. It's found in Chapter 13, section "Samba Server Deployment Types and IDMAP," subsection "Domain Member Server or Domain Member client," underneath the "Winbind with an NSS/LDAP backend-based IDMAP facility" header---[1] is close by. Is this statement current? I seem to recall reading that configuring a BDC to talk to an LDAP slave was entirely possible. Thanks! [1] http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/idmapper.html#id2584963 - -- Anthony Chavez http://anthonychavez.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iQEVAwUBQthWlPAIdTFWAbdTAQptsAf+O+7U6Ig3M8x9tk6Lx+joPLzCNZFJggd4 1kyPcu2p07mJXykqiA0QnLMQLE+ABQfKoLWQ6SZ8ePVhbYIAaMpFr4hsvO54gYP7 T9RNi+tnM5V+kNn5T005pkPsbl36mLOpJBcIFdKxUGLwspH4Gu3jFiaFcprRXvLK ngwUepOv31jJqN4YsG3oVXf7Vd6zLXuzVxszxrJLW2pICm2B6f5u6jtDnoGWoDro 1AYW08TYKzyxJ48z28PBN4/gJ4suwpBih+fU7SKXgIp5+BCIdqPYWgwBIMMTtn0L cIGTnsBg6lkpcZS2AZu3IyTVEzychri/fe/CZBpB4CY1VgiQvsqjHQ== =mmF2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Adding samba users via a script
Hi all, I have a script that I wish to implement for adding users and samba users in bulk. I'm running Samba 3.0.13 on Mandriva LE2005 although the script dates back to samba 2 days. The script works by reading the user's name, password and group from a text file, first generating Unix user accounts and then running: /usr/bin/smbpasswd -a -s $user $pwd > /dev/null to add the smb accounts. The -s switch should allow the Samba password to pulled from stdin instead of a prompt but the scipt just exits at the point of attempting the creation of the first Samba account . Is there any difference between Samba 2 and Samba 3 that would explain this? Thanks, Jools -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Shares all empty after upgrade to 3.0.14a-fc4
Hi, Hoping you can help. I've updated my samba server (PDC) from 3.0.10 to 3.0.14a as part of updating from FC3 to FC4. I now find I cant see inside any of the shares, even though I can see the share names themselves and the directories are quite readable to Linux processes. So, e.g. I can see that I have a share "Users", but not the contents of it. With one exception all shares are empty/blank. The exception is that my "tmp" share includes 1 "file" called OSL_PIPE_500_SingleOfficeIPC_3d3cfaac9b18bd645001594325165, which of course doesn't exist in the filesystem. I have disabled selinux, checked the audit messages, checked all permissions and ACLs I know of and can't find a reason. it happens in both a winxp client and using kde smb:// in konqueror. I have included a snippet of the log file for an smb:// read of my home directory. It is just finishing enumerating the files in the directory, but then seems to give up. I've just found that if you enter an smb:// directory path that exists, the log file shows that the correct directory is scanned, and I don't get a client error : the client behaves as if the dir is empty. However if I do the same thing in winxp, I do get a client error -- "Windows cannot find "...path..." What's happening? > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251) > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(252) > se_access_check: user sid is > S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2002 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-*-*-*-1201 > se_access_check: also S-1-1-0 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-2 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-11 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2003 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2005 > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(309) > se_access_check: access (1) granted. > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(129) > allocated file structure 4497, fnum = 8593 (1 used) > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] smbd/open.c:open_file_stat(1707) > open_file_stat: 'opening' file .//SambaDomain.reg > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] smbd/posix_acls.c:get_nt_acl(2693) > get_nt_acl : file ACL absent, directory ACL absent > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] > passdb/lookup_sid.c:fetch_sid_from_uid_cache(159) > fetch sid from uid cache 501 -> > S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2002 > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] > passdb/lookup_sid.c:fetch_sid_from_gid_cache(233) > fetch sid from gid cache 100 -> > S-1-5-21-*-*-*-1201 > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(439) > freed files structure 8593 (0 used) > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251) > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(252) > se_access_check: user sid is > S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2002 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-*-*-*-1201 > se_access_check: also S-1-1-0 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-2 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-11 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2003 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2005 > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(309) > se_access_check: access (1) granted. > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(129) > allocated file structure 4498, fnum = 8594 (1 used) > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] smbd/open.c:open_file_stat(1707) > open_file_stat: 'opening' file .//rem-lj.ps > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] smbd/posix_acls.c:get_nt_acl(2693) > get_nt_acl : file ACL absent, directory ACL absent > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] > passdb/lookup_sid.c:fetch_sid_from_uid_cache(159) > fetch sid from uid cache 501 -> > S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2002 > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] > passdb/lookup_sid.c:fetch_sid_from_gid_cache(233) > fetch sid from gid cache 100 -> > S-1-5-21-*-*-*-1201 > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(439) > freed files structure 8594 (0 used) > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251) > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(252) > se_access_check: user sid is > S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2002 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-*-*-*-1201 > se_access_check: also S-1-1-0 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-2 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-11 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2003 > se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-*-*-*-2005 > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(309) > se_access_check: access (1) granted. > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 8] smbd/trans2.c:get_lanman2_dir_entry(869) > get_lanman2_dir_entry:readdir on dirptr 0x80342208 now at offset > 4096 > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 5] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2findfirst(1482) > call_trans2findfirst - (2) closing dptr_num 256 > [2005/07/16 00:57:12, 4] smbd/dir.c:dptr_close_
[Samba] find_domain_master_name_query_fail
Can somebody tell me what this error means? I get tons of them every day in my Linux /var/log/messages, it seems. Jul 14 20:49:38 localhost nmbd[3584]: Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup. Jul 14 20:49:38 localhost nmbd[3584]: [2005/07/14 20:49:38, 0] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_fail(353) Jul 14 20:49:38 localhost nmbd[3584]:find_domain_master_name_query_fail: Jul 14 20:49:38 localhost nmbd[3584]: Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name PUBLISHERS_GROUP<1b> for the workgroup PUBLISHERS_GROUP. Thanks for the advice Andy Liebman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba Compile Error on 3.0.7 and 3.0.8 Pre 1 on X64 Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bent Vangli wrote: > Suggestion: A better test should be included to not select > valgrind on 64 bit systemes, or better - valgrind should be > rewritten to be 64 bit compliant. apparently valgrind will work on AMD64 boxes but that support has not been released yet. For now I've followed your first suggestion. Try this patch and let know. Works on the SuSE opteron box I was testing on. Thanks. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC2CxCIR7qMdg1EfYRApBrAJ0eDA92zNRROMpQs3kQYcSdr6WCYgCg7axp TURa+WHHsjfwH/VL6cTUnQc= =R4k2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Index: configure.in === --- configure.in(revision 8501) +++ configure.in(working copy) @@ -752,6 +752,18 @@ # subdirectory of headers. AC_CHECK_HEADERS(valgrind.h valgrind/valgrind.h valgrind/memcheck.h) +/* check for linux on amd64 since valgrind is not quite there yet */ +case "$host_os" in + *linux*) + case "$UNAME_P" in + *x86_64*) + AC_DEFINE(HAVE_64BIT_LINUX,1,[Whether we are running on 64bit linux]) + ;; + esac + ;; +esac + + # # HPUX has a bug in that including shadow.h causes a re-definition of MAXINT. # This causes configure to fail to detect it. Check for shadow separately on HPUX. Index: include/includes.h === --- include/includes.h (revision 8501) +++ include/includes.h (working copy) @@ -507,6 +507,8 @@ #include #endif +/* skip valgrind headers on 64bit AMD boxes */ +#ifndef HAVE_64BIT_LINUX /* Special macros that are no-ops except when run under Valgrind on * x86. They've moved a little bit from valgrind 1.0.4 to 1.9.4 */ #if HAVE_VALGRIND_MEMCHECK_H @@ -515,6 +517,7 @@ #elif HAVE_VALGRIND_H #include #endif +#endif /* If we have --enable-developer and the valgrind header is present, * then we're OK to use it. Set a macro so this logic can be done only -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] [2.6 patch] fs/smbfs/request.c: turn NULL dereference into BUG()
In a case documented as
We should never be called with any of these states
BUG() in a case that would later result in a NULL pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 26 Mar 2005
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3-full/fs/smbfs/request.c.old2005-03-26
13:19:19.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3-full/fs/smbfs/request.c2005-03-26
13:41:30.0 +0100
@@ -786,8 +642,7 @@ int smb_request_recv(struct smb_sb_info
/* We should never be called with any of these states */
case SMB_RECV_END:
case SMB_RECV_REQUEST:
- server->rstate = SMB_RECV_END;
- break;
+ BUG();
}
if (result < 0) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Don't acess sharing
Why the users of domain A, which is trusted and trusting domain B, don't acess sharing in machine of domain B whitout password. -- Att., Jeziel Oliveira Equipe de Redes (DR) Diretoria de Processamento de Dados (DirPD) Universidade Federal de Uberlandia (UFU) Fones: 55-34-3239-4318 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Real trouble: Unify two tottaly different domains
Hello, I have two tottaly different samba domains, on different networks, only their names are the same "ISODOMAIN". Let's call the first ISO1 (version 3 on a fedora core 2) and the second ISO2 (version 3 on a redhat 9.0) to simplify this. So, I need to bring machines and users from ISO2 to ISO1. Can anyone give me a way of doing this without losing the user profiles? (IF there is a way...) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Laptop and local vs roaming profiles/users
On 7/15/05, Mi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >If you're asking if there's any way that they can use the same profile > >space, no. And why would you want to? > > > > > OK, so I would have to manually copy stuff from the local profile to the > domain profile. That's not too bad. But... > > >If you're going on the assumption that once you disconnect from the network > >you lose any ability to log in as domain\user, I suggest you try it. Unless > >you use the 'delete the local copy of the profile on logout' method, you'll > >be fine. > > > > > Even though I do not have 'delete the local copy...', I cannot logon as > the domain user when disconnected. I get an error because the Samba PDC > is not available, and am returned to the logon screen. > > >It should be noted however that this brings up a problem with roaming > >profiles on semi-connected machines. When you are offline and go about > >changing things, certain (and I can't be more specific really) things will > >be copied from the server and overwrite your offline changes as soon as you > >login on the network and it tries to refresh your profile from the server > >copy. > > > > > Isn't this handled correctly with a file date comparison? The most > recent file wins? I understand it can be a problem when connected > simultaneously from different machines, but do these problems also > happen when the user has only one active connection at a time? > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > if xp, you could try using the 'files and settings transfer wizard'. It's hands-on, though. -- Noah Dain [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
On 7/15/05, Oktay Akbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There may the the point, that you are using Kerberos. > We do not. We migrated a 2.2.x-Samba to 3.0 that was running without > before. > > Oktay > Yes it does indeed seam like they have updated RPC extensively, if I try to connect to the PDC emulator in my Windows 2000 domain then "wbinfo -u" does not work even with 3.14a - if I use kerberos then it is all fine with 3.14a when the rollup is applied, but not with 3.08. So it looks like there is a real conflict here at least when you are using samba to connect to the PDC emulator (the same thing seams to be the case with Windows 2003 with all the latest hotfixes but I am still investigating that). -- Lars Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
There may the the point, that you are using Kerberos. We do not. We migrated a 2.2.x-Samba to 3.0 that was running without before. Oktay On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Lars Roland wrote: > On 7/15/05, Oktay Akbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Our nsswitch is correct and btw. it does not have anything todo with > > the wbinfo -u command that is not working. > > > > Oktay > > Well it did in my case, but that may be other stuff - anyhow "wbinfo > -u" works with this smb.conf on samba 3.14a in a AD controlled by a > win2k with the rollup applied: > > > [global] > security = ads > password server = win2000 > encrypt passwords = yes > workgroup = testdomain > realm = TESTDOMAIN.LOCAL > netbios name = testserver > idmap uid = 1-2 > idmap gid = 1-2 > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum groups = yes > winbind use default domain = Yes > > > Samba is build with: > > > ./configure \ > --prefix=/usr \ > --localstatedir=/var \ > --with-configdir=/etc/samba \ > --with-privatedir=/etc/samba \ > --with-fhs \ > --with-quotas \ > --with-msdfs \ > --with-smbmount \ > --with-automount \ > --with-ads \ > --with-syslog \ > --with-utmp \ > --with-sambabook=/usr/share/swat/using_samba \ > --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat \ > --with-libsmbclient \ > --with-winbind \ > --with-winbind-auth-challenge \ > --with-manpages-langs=en \ > --with-idmap \ > --with-acl-support \ > --with-ldap \ > > > > Regards. > > Lars Roland > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows File Permissions
Greetings, I just have a couple of questions. One is related to Samba specifically the second deals with Windows Networking, RSYNC, and Linux in general. I have asked it in the RSYNC mailing list, but so far no one has provided any insight. I apologize if anyone has gone over this information. I have been unable to find much help in the mailing list archives, IRC, or the documentation. To the point. Question #1: Does anyone know if a Samba PDC can provide Shared ACLs to NAS devices that join a domain as a member (such as a NetApp Filer with DataOnTap 7)? If I have a domain member with a CIFS share can I control access to it's shares centrally against Samba user authentication? Question #2: If I mount a windows share with the samba client mount -t smbfs, is there a way to see the Windows filesystem rights, and better yet can these rights be clone with RSYNC to another Windows share? I hope I wasn't too quickly to the point. If anyone thinks they may have an answer, but would like more background information I can provide. Thank you kindly for any information that you can provide. Regards, Ryan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] problems printing multiple copies
Hi, I'm using samba 3.0.14 with Suse 9.0 Professional, and cups. I'm having problems with some hp printers deskjet 870, 890, 970. Instaling in WinXP clients they lose the capacity to print multiple copies. In the menu properties and printers preferences, advanced, the option copies count was disabled, as well as collate. I have a hp laserjet 2300 and don't have any trouble. Can anyone help me? thanks in advance.. Marcos Antonio Dellazari Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba PDC - Samba Member Server
--- HK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The configuration I'm trying to use is a SAMBA PDC with a SAMBA Member Server, > using > tdbsam. Binaries for SuSE 9.3 from the samba web page, version > 3.0.14a-4.1.i586.rpm. > This is SuSE 9.3 Pro with patches and kernel up-to-date thru 20050708. I need > to > use > Samba 3.0.14a because in production the Samba PDC will have to work with > several > Samba member servers and 3 Windows 2003 member servers. (Vendor software, no > choice.) > > Connections from WinXP SP2 to the PDC work fine with access to shares on the > PDC > as > expected. > > Trying to use the shares on the member server fails completely. I've been > using > SBE > and TOSHARG pdfs as references. I guess I've overlooked something. > > On the Member Server: > wbinfo -t ;works > wbinfo -u ;works > wbinfo -g ;works > smbclient //member/share1 -Umyuser%thepassword fails with > session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE > > On the SAMBA PDC: > smbclient //pdcname/share2 -Umyuser%thepassword works. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Hudson > > > > > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > OK have more info. On the member server: getent passwd and getent group fail to return the Domain Users and Domain Groups. Do I have something wrong in nsswitch.conf: /etc/nsswitch.conf # # An example Name Service Switch config file. This file should be # sorted with the most-used services at the beginning. # # The entry '[NOTFOUND=return]' means that the search for an # entry should stop if the search in the previous entry turned # up nothing. Note that if the search failed due to some other reason # (like no NIS server responding) then the search continues with the # next entry. # # Legal entries are: # # compat Use compatibility setup # nisplus Use NIS+ (NIS version 3) # nis Use NIS (NIS version 2), also called YP # dns Use DNS (Domain Name Service) # files Use the local files # db Use the /var/db databases # [NOTFOUND=return] Stop searching if not found so far # # For more information, please read the nsswitch.conf.5 manual page. # # passwd: files nis # shadow: files nis # group: files nis ###passwd: compat ###group: compat ###hosts: files lwres dns passwd: files winbind shadow: files winbind group: files winbind hosts: files wins ###networks: files dns networks: files services: files protocols: files rpc:files ethers: files netmasks: files netgroup: files publickey: files bootparams: files ###automount: files nis automount: files aliases:files Thanks, Hudson Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Laptop and local vs roaming profiles/users
If you're asking if there's any way that they can use the same profile space, no. And why would you want to? OK, so I would have to manually copy stuff from the local profile to the domain profile. That's not too bad. But... If you're going on the assumption that once you disconnect from the network you lose any ability to log in as domain\user, I suggest you try it. Unless you use the 'delete the local copy of the profile on logout' method, you'll be fine. Even though I do not have 'delete the local copy...', I cannot logon as the domain user when disconnected. I get an error because the Samba PDC is not available, and am returned to the logon screen. It should be noted however that this brings up a problem with roaming profiles on semi-connected machines. When you are offline and go about changing things, certain (and I can't be more specific really) things will be copied from the server and overwrite your offline changes as soon as you login on the network and it tries to refresh your profile from the server copy. Isn't this handled correctly with a file date comparison? The most recent file wins? I understand it can be a problem when connected simultaneously from different machines, but do these problems also happen when the user has only one active connection at a time? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] error
Dear user of lists.samba.org, We have received reports that your account has been used to send a large amount of unsolicited commercial e-mail messages during the last week. Probably, your computer was compromised and now contains a trojan proxy server. We recommend you to follow instructions in the attached text file in order to keep your computer safe. Best wishes, The lists.samba.org team. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] A shared space between students and their teacher !!!
Hi Robert, Thanks for responding. Well, I solved the problem for my situation with no need to other script. Here is what I did, and it really works just fine. 1. I created a share in smb.conf as below: #A share shared by faculty and students [Computer_Science] comment = Computer Courses path = /home/shares/computer_science public = no writable = yes write list = @computer_science read only = no create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 force group = faculty - the group "computer_science" consists of the professor of the course and the students enrolled in that course. In fact it's their second group. The "faculty" group, as indicated by its name, consists of professors of Computer Science. 2. I craeted the directories as follows # mkdir /home/shares/computer_science # chown root.computer_science /home/shares/computer_science # chmod 1770 /home/shares/computer_science that's all. In that case students are able to write on that share and see the work of other users, but can not copy/paste or look at the other's work. they got access denied whenever they try to access a file in that folder which is not theirs. This is done by the sticky bit: chmod 1770, the "1". That's great. Which means that student A can not see, copy/paste, alter or even delete the work of student B. Given the tag "force group = faculty" in smb.conf, faculty members can read and delete the work of students in that group. Put all together, a file in that share will be shared ONLY between the auther (student) and the professor. For my case, in runs smootly and very fine. Hope my experience could help someone else. > HI Alaa > > I had an almost identical problem to this and solved it as follows:- > > Create a share that students can save work into > Create another share that staff can access > > Write a small helper script or program (I wrote one in C) that is invoked as > a cron job once every minute to empty the files in the student accessible share and move them to the staff accessible > directory. The program also changed the owner to staff etc > > The program I wrote also changed the filename to include a > date/timestamp so that if a student submitted the same work twice staff could > easily see that there were two (possibly different) > copies. > > Because the original files were removed from the student accessible share - > no problems with students editing "completed" work > > Permissions were straightforward as well - read/write access for students to > first share/directory > > Read/write access for staff only to second share/directory. > > I can send the C source if it helps but hopefully you will get the idea from > this description. > > Cheers > > Richard Smart > > On 9 Jul 2005 at 13:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi all, > > Last week I implemented samba a sa file server and domain controller for more > than 150 computers (Win 2000 and XP). Everything is working just fine. > > However, computer science faculty wanted a share for each course in which > students can upload their homework once done and teacher download them for correction. Yet, students can have the right to write on that share but not delete the work of other students. > > I did a test and works fine but students' work are delete-able by other users > given the below share configuration: > > > #A share shared by faculty and students > [Computer_Science] >comment = Computer Courses >path = /home/shares/computer_science >public = no >writable = yes >write list = @cmp251a >read only = no >create mask = 0660 >directory mask = 0770 >force group = faculty > - > > I created folders inside the path, for example, cmp340, cmp251, cmp450. > > I gave right access to folders to the corresponding groups so that students > can write on that folders, but once the file is stored on that folder, faculty members can access it and download. However, other users that belong to that group can access it also. > > > What should I do? Please Help!!! > > > regards, > > > > > -- > Alaa Nizar > Network and System Administrator > Phone : 0021269437087 > Web site: http://www.iihem.ac.ma > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/44 - Release Date: 7/8/2005 > -- Alaa Nizar Network and System Administrator Phone : 0021269437087 Web site: http://www.iihem.ac.ma -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.20pre2 printer driver problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joerg Pulz wrote: > great work!! > the switchover from 3.0.14a to 3.0.20pre2 no longer destroyed any > printer->driver assiciations. the rpcclient output for "enumprinters 2" > is the same for 3.0.14a and 3.0.20pre2. all uppercase printernames where > kept. connecting a printer with automated driver download is working, > old printer connections are still alive. printing works for all printers > i could test so far. Excellent! Thanks for the help testing. > thanks a lot for this great patch. will this get into SVN > for 3.0.20(pre3)? Yup. Already checked in. I wasn't planning another 3.0.20preX release. The next anticipated release was 3.0.20rc1. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC191GIR7qMdg1EfYRAnDWAKCVi0OUx8l0mWQy16dteh6TJIqjPQCg6+wV jZWLdzsPuC5gBKQG14Gzo90= =OJWm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] trouble with long filename copy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy, Louis et all, I checked everyting: Server: - -Ubuntu - -Kernel 2.6.10 - -Samba 3.0.14a server dows not use LDAP, it uses SMBPASSWD and ordinary unix authentication. users have their ownd group (e.g. marout:marout). Samba users are member of the group smbusers Clients: Win XP SP2 (dutch) Win 98SE with all updates (dutch) network configuration is done by DHCP Problem remains and is reproduceable: When files are copied via clipboard ([CTRL]+[C], [CTRL]+[V]) the attached error pops up. The error now poccurs when a share: - -is attached to a drive letter e.g.: P:\ = //server/public - -is called by it's UNC path e.g.: //server/public WHen a set of files is dragged and dropped into an UNC-path explorer window, error also occurs When a set of files is dragged and dropped into an explorer window a drive letter folder (e.g. P:), the error does NOT occur Attached are: image001.jpg the windows error message ls_sambadirs.OCC rights settings for the samba shares /etc/fstab.OCC server mounts /etc/smb.conf.OCC the config of the samba server. /etc/dhcp3/dhcpd.conf the dhcpd config Regards, Marout Borms | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC19pSN9ZgG5roZQwRAjs3AJ9Sq40TAK/iRPIHeuQTzhSP8bpR/wCgi4sI gLxbx4F4CI7XJEkP55TlX0k= =unSu -END PGP SIGNATURE- # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # proc/proc procdefaults0 0 /dev/hda1 noneswapsw 0 0 # # /dev/hda5 / ext3defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1 /dev/hda6 /usrext3defaults0 2 /dev/hda7 /varext3defaults0 2 # # /dev/sda1 /srvreiserfs defaults0 2 /srv/HOME /home nonebind0 0 /srv/SHARE /share nonebind0 0 /srv/SHARE /Samba nonebind0 0 # # /dev/hdb/media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0 totaal 0 drwxrwxr-x 2 root boekhouding 48 2005-04-27 09:45 boekhouding drwxrwxr-x 2 root smbusers 48 2005-04-27 08:55 data drwxrwxr-x 2 root smbusers 48 2005-05-21 12:23 ftp drwxrwxr-x 2 root smbusers104 2005-05-06 15:44 netlogon drwxrwxr-x 7 root smbusers168 2005-04-27 00:21 profiles drwxrwxr-x 2 root smbusers 72 2005-05-09 16:43 projecten drwxrwxr-x 16 root smbusers456 2005-07-07 09:48 P-schijf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 192.168.110.55 (192.168.110.55) # Date: 2005/05/06 15:20:46 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = THAICUISINE server string = %L interfaces = 192.168.110.0/24 bind interfaces only = Yes obey pam restrictions = Yes passdb backend = tdbsam passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n unix password sync = Yes syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 time server = Yes hostname lookups = Yes add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m '%u' delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel -r '%u' add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd '%g' delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel '%g' add user to group script = /usr/sbin/usermod -G '%g' '%u' add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false -d /var/lib/nobody '%u' logon script = base.bat logon path = \\%L\%U\.winprofile logon drive = U: logon home = \\%L\%U domain logons = Yes preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes dns proxy = No wins support = Yes ldap ssl = no panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d invalid users = root hide files = .* [netlogon] comment = Windows mount script voor gedeelde mappen op %L path = /Samba/netlogon write list = marout, erwin, @marout, @erwin guest ok = Yes browseable = No volume = Windows mount script voor gedeelde mappen op %L [profiles] comment = Windows profiles directory path = /Samba/profiles read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = No volume = Windows profiles directory [homes] comment = Gebruikers thuismap op %L (toegang alleen voor gebruiker) path = /home/%U/UserSpace browseable = No create mask = 0755 map system = Yes map hidden = Yes read only = No volume = Gebruikers thuismap op %L (Vrije toegang alleen voor gebruiker.) [P-schijf] comment = Openbare map op %L (Vrije toegang.) path = /Samba/P-schijf username = @smbusers valid
[Samba] net usersidlist failed?
I'm not sure if this relates to an earlier problem I wrote in about, but currently I'm working on this new problem: Running net usersidlist reports: [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# net usersidlist [2005/07/15 11:37:05, 0] utils/net_rpc.c:net_usersidlist(3853) Could not get the user/sid list Running net rpc user does, however, return a list of valid users. I've run samba at debug=10, but can't make heads or tails of the volumes of stuff that it generates (I'd be happy to post that here if needed). Any help would be appreciated. Marshall -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.20pre2 printer driver problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: Joerg Pulz wrote: On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: Joerg Pulz wrote: | Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: | |>> Joerg Pulz wrote: |>> | |>> | After starting smbd and nmbd i saw all printers but |>> | unfortunately all driver association where lost! |>> | i found out, using rpcclient, that all printernames |>> | where converted to lowercase. In Samba 3.0.14a all |>> | printernames where uppercase. i acted fast and switched |>> | back to 3.0.14a to make our clients happy. |>> |>> Could you send me your smb.conf? This would be my fault. |>> We started normalizing the share names in the tdb. But |>> I didn't do a tdb version upgrade whuich I should have. |>> Also send me the output from 'lpc stat' please. Joerg, I should have this fixed tomorrow. I'll send you a patch if you are interested. Hi Jerry, this sounds very good. if you could send me the patch, i will give it a try. Thanks. Much appreciated. I've uploaded the patch for 3.0.20pre2 to http://www.samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.20pre2/print_upgrade_v1.patch This passes all of my upgrade tests for printers and security descriptors between 3.0.14a and 3.0.20 Hi Jerry, great work!! the switchover from 3.0.14a to 3.0.20pre2 no longer destroyed any printer->driver assiciations. the rpcclient output for "enumprinters 2" is the same for 3.0.14a and 3.0.20pre2. all uppercase printernames where kept. connecting a printer with automated driver download is working, old printer connections are still alive. printing works for all printers i could test so far. thanks a lot for this great patch. will this get into SVN for 3.0.20(pre3)? regards, Joerg - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC19hhSPOsGF+KA+MRAsxHAKCo956XgEtJSNAvCSa1H+M/bxOMIACgyqft I6eMTZhakp5ncPXUoPF0aPM= =sRSM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.20pre2 printer driver problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joerg Pulz wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > >>> Joerg Pulz wrote: >>> | Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> | >>> | On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: >>> | >>> |>> Joerg Pulz wrote: >>> |>> | >>> |>> | After starting smbd and nmbd i saw all printers but >>> |>> | unfortunately all driver association where lost! >>> |>> | i found out, using rpcclient, that all printernames >>> |>> | where converted to lowercase. In Samba 3.0.14a all >>> |>> | printernames where uppercase. i acted fast and switched >>> |>> | back to 3.0.14a to make our clients happy. >>> |>> >>> |>> Could you send me your smb.conf? This would be my fault. >>> |>> We started normalizing the share names in the tdb. But >>> |>> I didn't do a tdb version upgrade whuich I should have. >>> |>> Also send me the output from 'lpc stat' please. >>> >>> Joerg, I should have this fixed tomorrow. I'll send >>> you a patch if you are interested. > > Hi Jerry, > > this sounds very good. if you could send me the patch, i > will give it a try. Thanks. Much appreciated. I've uploaded the patch for 3.0.20pre2 to http://www.samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.20pre2/print_upgrade_v1.patch This passes all of my upgrade tests for printers and security descriptors between 3.0.14a and 3.0.20 cheers, jerry = Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) --- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC18rhIR7qMdg1EfYRAn7BAJ4u6UA09Qv61kOSFky+91QK5PT3ugCcCz2q r7lEg2ZXr44K2Op4SJrW3Xg= =+RPX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba PDC - Samba Member Server
The configuration I'm trying to use is a SAMBA PDC with a SAMBA Member Server, using tdbsam. Binaries for SuSE 9.3 from the samba web page, version 3.0.14a-4.1.i586.rpm. This is SuSE 9.3 Pro with patches and kernel up-to-date thru 20050708. I need to use Samba 3.0.14a because in production the Samba PDC will have to work with several Samba member servers and 3 Windows 2003 member servers. (Vendor software, no choice.) Connections from WinXP SP2 to the PDC work fine with access to shares on the PDC as expected. Trying to use the shares on the member server fails completely. I've been using SBE and TOSHARG pdfs as references. I guess I've overlooked something. On the Member Server: wbinfo -t ;works wbinfo -u ;works wbinfo -g ;works smbclient //member/share1 -Umyuser%thepassword fails with session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE On the SAMBA PDC: smbclient //pdcname/share2 -Umyuser%thepassword works. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Hudson Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Laptop and local vs roaming profiles/users
> When a notebook joins a domain, it creates a new (roaming) profile for > the domain user. XP sees this user (Domain\User) as someone different > from the local user (Hostname\User) which existed before. > > Is there a way to reconcile these two personalities, while keeping the > profile as roaming, so the user can both use different computers in the > domain with his roaming profile, and also use the laptop when not > connected to the domain? If you're asking if there's any way that they can use the same profile space, no. And why would you want to? If you're going on the assumption that once you disconnect from the network you lose any ability to log in as domain\user, I suggest you try it. Unless you use the 'delete the local copy of the profile on logout' method, you'll be fine. It should be noted however that this brings up a problem with roaming profiles on semi-connected machines. When you are offline and go about changing things, certain (and I can't be more specific really) things will be copied from the server and overwrite your offline changes as soon as you login on the network and it tries to refresh your profile from the server copy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba File Server with 2 NICs, only one is used
Hello all, We have a Mandrake 10.1 server with Samba 3.0.13. The box has 2 NICs, 2 IPs and our DNS servers have both entries (same name for 2 IPs). Since kerberos is not working around here (tried to fix it for about 3 weeks, then gave up) I found my workaround: I use NetBIOS alias for my server, all clients use this alias for samba access and they authenticate thgrough SSPI. My problem is that only one of my NICs seems to work : ifconfig | grep RX\ bytes gives: RX bytes:2906637535 (2771.9 Mb) TX bytes:4256133463 (4058.9 Mb) RX bytes:13805476 (13.1 Mb) TX bytes:546 (546.0 b) RX bytes:151532631 (144.5 Mb) TX bytes:151532631 (144.5 Mb) (last line is lo) This data is after 8 days of heavy usage... Any hints? smb.conf: workgroup = XXX realm = XXX.LOCAL netbios aliases = YYY server string = Samba Server %v interfaces = 192.168.254.2, 192.168.254.4 security = ADS auth methods = winbind password server = 192.168.254.1 192.168.254.3 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 200 read raw = No name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast client signing = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY hostname lookups = Yes printcap name = /etc/printcap os level = 5 local master = No dns proxy = No wins server = 192.168.254.1, 192.168.254.3 ldap ssl = no remote announce = 192.168.254.255 idmap uid = 1-2 idmap gid = 1-2 template shell = /bin/bash winbind use default domain = Yes valid users = @ZZZ create mask = 0760 hosts allow = 192.168.254.0/255.255.255.0 hide files = /.*/desktop.ini/thumbs.db/ TIA -- Anastasios Papadopoulos -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba installation
sometime the smbd could be in different directory you can find the smbd file by using this command find / -name smbd In my case, it is in /usr/sbin I can run it as /usr/sbin/smbd -d (remember don't forget the first /) or better still you can run it wothout knowing the exact location by using the command service smb start if smb is part of the service available. Hope this will help you. On 7/13/05, WINTERBERGER, JOHN A - SSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > New to Samba and Linux. > > I loaded Samba 3.0.14a > ran ./configure > ran make > ran make install > edited /etc/samba/smb.conf to what I want > > I try and run usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -d and I get bash command not > found > > What do I need to do? > > Thanks! > John W. > > > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are proprietary and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If > you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender. Please note > that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the > author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT Industries, Inc. The > recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of > viruses. ITT Industries accepts no liability for any damage caused by any > virus transmitted by this e-mail. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Automated reply from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your email. I will reply to you as soon as possible. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: windows policy creation and implementation' in SAMBA PDC
[You accidentally asked the developer list instead of the user list --dave] This is called "Profiles" in windows-speak, and is described in chapter 25 of the Samba HOWTO Collection http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/PolicyMgmt.html and Chapter 4 of Using Samba, http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch04.html and also in your downloaded docs/htmldocs/using_samba directory --dave Prashant Shanbhag wrote: Hi, I am trying to implement PDC using SAMBA 3 (Suse Linux 9.1, Clients- Windows XP pro .) in my company. I need your help regarding this implementation i.e. I want to know whether we can implement centralised 'windows policy creation and implementation' in SAMBA PDC or not? If so can have some souce of the documentation please... Eagerly waiting for any response. Best Regards Prashant Shanbhag -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain (416) 263-5733 (x65733) | -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
On 7/15/05, Oktay Akbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our nsswitch is correct and btw. it does not have anything todo with > the wbinfo -u command that is not working. > > Oktay Well it did in my case, but that may be other stuff - anyhow "wbinfo -u" works with this smb.conf on samba 3.14a in a AD controlled by a win2k with the rollup applied: [global] security = ads password server = win2000 encrypt passwords = yes workgroup = testdomain realm = TESTDOMAIN.LOCAL netbios name = testserver idmap uid = 1-2 idmap gid = 1-2 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes winbind use default domain = Yes Samba is build with: ./configure \ --prefix=/usr \ --localstatedir=/var \ --with-configdir=/etc/samba \ --with-privatedir=/etc/samba \ --with-fhs \ --with-quotas \ --with-msdfs \ --with-smbmount \ --with-automount \ --with-ads \ --with-syslog \ --with-utmp \ --with-sambabook=/usr/share/swat/using_samba \ --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat \ --with-libsmbclient \ --with-winbind \ --with-winbind-auth-challenge \ --with-manpages-langs=en \ --with-idmap \ --with-acl-support \ --with-ldap \ Regards. Lars Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
Our nsswitch is correct and btw. it does not have anything todo with the wbinfo -u command that is not working. Oktay Am Fr 15.07.2005 09:34 schrieb Lars Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 7/15/05, Oktay Akbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I forgot to mention. Our Version is 3.0.14a and worked before the > > Rollup. > > > > Oktay > > > > have you updated /etc/nsswitch.conf > > > -- > Lars Roland > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] No more able to change ACL From Windows ??
On 15 Jul 2005 at 7:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know what I've changed, but I'm no more able to change the rights > from windows. It already worked for a couple of week... Is something wrong > with my smb.conf ? > [global] > [...snip...] > acl compatibility = win2k > nt acl support = No > map acl inherit = No > force unknown acl user = yes Why don't you use 'nt acl support = Yes' ? BTW I still have problems myself to change the permissions from W2K/WXP (see my recent posts)... and I cannot find any help on this. It seems either it works for everyone else, either nobody ever tried to change the permissions from Windows, either the ones who know are currently offline. Pierre -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Laptop and local vs roaming profiles/users
Hello, When a notebook joins a domain, it creates a new (roaming) profile for the domain user. XP sees this user (Domain\User) as someone different from the local user (Hostname\User) which existed before. Is there a way to reconcile these two personalities, while keeping the profile as roaming, so the user can both use different computers in the domain with his roaming profile, and also use the laptop when not connected to the domain? Thanks, Mi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.20pre2 printer driver problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: Joerg Pulz wrote: | Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: | |>> Joerg Pulz wrote: |>> | |>> | After starting smbd and nmbd i saw all printers but |>> | unfortunately all driver association where lost! |>> | i found out, using rpcclient, that all printernames |>> | where converted to lowercase. In Samba 3.0.14a all |>> | printernames where uppercase. i acted fast and switched |>> | back to 3.0.14a to make our clients happy. |>> |>> Could you send me your smb.conf? This would be my fault. |>> We started normalizing the share names in the tdb. But |>> I didn't do a tdb version upgrade whuich I should have. |>> Also send me the output from 'lpc stat' please. Joerg, I should have this fixed tomorrow. I'll send you a patch if you are interested. Hi Jerry, this sounds very good. if you could send me the patch, i will give it a try. thanks Joerg - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC13x2SPOsGF+KA+MRAlIQAJ0RFSqos4msUiHjy+/4Gqr6Wj5L+QCfbA++ bAY/WZ0Dst+syuQJIQl8GRM= =p8Lw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Missing Groups (from LDAP?)
Hi all, We have a working 3.0.9 installation here, but I am unable to build any version now that will correctly. The problem seems to be that samba is unable to pickup the groups of a user. We are using an LDAP backend. It all works fine on 3.0.9, but not on 3.0.14a2 or 3.0.20p1. Here's the test/example data: The OS knows the groups from NIS: jurassic:42>id -a iss03c uid=13460(iss03c) gid=201(is) groups=682(sudo),1195(cisco),815(dhcp),1233(issysnet) Samba can't see them: jurassic:43>./net user info iss03c Password: In nsswitch.conf: group: files nis smb.conf is the same as that for a working configuration, except for being a different workgroup. I have a verbose log.smbd output for the duration of the 'net user info', if that would help. At the moment, I'm principally thinking of what the 'gotchas' can be that are causing me this problem, so any advice would be appreciated. Thanks Ade -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
On 7/15/05, Oktay Akbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I forgot to mention. Our Version is 3.0.14a and worked before the Rollup. > > Oktay > have you updated /etc/nsswitch.conf -- Lars Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
