Re: [Samba] any plans on getting psexec / cmdat equivalent to Samba?
The idea is to be able to execute commands on a win box with the standard ADMIN$ IPC$ shares available. SSH is not an option here unfortunately. I know that the samba team had plans on releasing something like this last winter but I guess other parts of the project took longer time than expected. Hopefully something will be available soon as it would be a very very helpful tool in bridging between linux servers and Win clients. Cheers, Henrik 28 maj 2006 kl. 17:34 skrev David Shapiro: How about ssh? ssh host ls David Shapiro Distributed Systems Unix Team Lead office: 919-765-2011 cellphone: 730-0538 "roland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/26/2006 6:39:45 PM >>> Hello ! If anybody want`s to implement the psexec unix port or samba equivalent, maybe taking a look at xCmd from Zoltan Csizmadia at http://www.codeguru.com/Cpp/I-N/network/remoteinvocation/ article.php/c5433/ may help a LOT and is a very good example. (This one seems to work similar like psexec - but it is available with sourcecode!) I don`t know if the author is still reachable via this mail adress or if there is any chance to get some help with "creating the xCMD/psexec equivalent for linux", but I CC'ed him with this mail to say "thank you for making it and for providing the source". regards roland k. systems engineer List: samba Subject:[Samba] any plans on getting psexec / cmdat equivalent to Samba? From: Tomasz Chmielewski Date: 2006-03-22 11:00:23 Message-ID: 44212E47.4040300 () wpkg ! org [Download message RAW] Windows admins can make their work easier with a tool like psexec. It allows to execute commands remotely, without the need to install anything on the target machine. All that is needed is username/password of course. Unfortunately, psexec command only runs on Windows. The usage is as follows (we start notepad interactively with -i to show that something happens): psexec \\192.168.1.2 -i -u username -p password notepad It waits for the command to complete, and returns its exit code, so can be used within scripts. A similar tool we can use with Samba is cmdat, which comes together with samba-tng (one just needs to compile samba-tng, and then can use the tool with a "regular" Samba). To start a command on a remote system, we can use (we start notepad interactively with /interactive to show that something happens): cmdat -I 192.168.1.2 -U 'username%password' -c 'at now /interactive notepdad' Unfortunately, it uses at to start commands (1 minute from the current time when we use "now"), so we know nothing about the status of the running command, nor get any exit code. In other words, it's close to impossible to use it in scripts to do anything useful (other than starting single commands). Is any work done in Samba to get a tool similar to psexec? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba PDC and windows XP client
Hello, I am running a samba PDC controller on debian testing. I can use it effectively from both Windows / Linux. There is only one annoying point. When I browse the network from windows XP (Sp2), I see, in "My netwkork Places / Entire Network / Microsoft Windows Network" two networks. One is the one I am expecting (with the Xp client and the server inside), the other network (which I cannot browse), has the name of my samba server. When I lauch the NT user manager console, at first Windows try to connect to this domain (which indeed does not exist) and says "could not find DC for this domain". I have to manually input the correct name to see my domain users/groups. Honestly I cannot understand from where XP is taking this domain name. On linux, if I type "net rap domain" I got back one entry, the one I am expecting. Thank you in advance and best regards, Marco -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.3/350 - Release Date: 5/28/2006 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: RE [Samba] Failover LDAP?
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 19:05 +1000, adrian sender wrote: > Samba 3 By Example Chapter 6. > > Figure 6.3. Samba Configuration to Use a Dual (Fail-over) LDAP Server > > passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://master.abmas.biz \ > ldapsam:ldap://slave.abmas.biz This is the incorrect way to handle this problem. The correct syntax is given as an example in the smb.conf manpage: passdb backend = ldapsam:"ldap://ldap-1.example.com \ ldap://ldap-2.example.com"; Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.23rc1 - Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY handler
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:54:43AM +1000, James Peach wrote: > > Unfortunately, I think that this means that we need a new configure > > macro to test whether linking with librt implicitly links libpthread. If > > it does, we can disable clock_gettime without disabling > > --with-profiling-data. > > This was way more horrible than I expected, but the attached patch > implements the checks I describe above. Wow - that *is* ugly :-). But it does what we need (which is to make sure we don't link with pthreads). If you're happy with it commit it and we'll monitor the build farm to see what breaks. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.23rc1 - Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY handler
On 5/29/06, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:34:57PM +0200, Thomas Bork wrote: > Please accept this patch for configure.in, removing the function > introduced in 15508 (Use clock_gettime for profiling timestamps if it is > available. Use the fastest clock available on uniprocessors.): Hmmm. Fully removing it might not be really the right thing. It might however be good to only link in -lrt (and thus the depending pthreads) if --with-profiling-data=yes. James, what do you think? Yeh, that seems like the right thing to do. -- James Peach | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Windows clients cannot print in color
Hmmm... Be careful with the 1.2 series of CUPS. I've noticed problems with color printer ppds in this version. I've been using 1.1.23 with foomatic/postscript drivers (downloaded from linuxprinting.org) with no real problems. What kind of color laser printers do you have? At my job, we use HP 4550Ns. Also, make sure you're using the CUPS windows driver with your Windows clients. That may help a bit. Theodore Charles III Network Administrator Los Angeles Senior High From: Dale Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Windows clients cannot print in color Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:59:05 -0500 I have a Samba 3.0.22 server running as "security = ADS" on a Debian Sarge 3.1 system and operating as expected. I recently added print server functions via CUPS 1.2.1. The drivers appear to install properly on the clients. Test pages print flawlessly from the CUPS server, but will only print grayscale from the Windows 2000/XP clients. It is a universal phenomenon, applying to all 3 color laser printers. PDF's are also a problem - either mangled or nothing at all. Three days on Google hasn't been able to help me, maybe one of you can. Thanks, -- Dale Schroeder -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.23rc1 - Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY handler
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 09:38:27PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:34:57PM +0200, Thomas Bork wrote: > > Please accept this patch for configure.in, removing the function > > introduced in 15508 (Use clock_gettime for profiling timestamps if it is > > available. Use the fastest clock available on uniprocessors.): > > Hmmm. Fully removing it might not be really the right thing. > It might however be good to only link in -lrt (and thus the > depending pthreads) if --with-profiling-data=yes. Hmmm. Yes, although it's definately a bug in the underlying system that linking with pthreads does this. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.23rc1 - Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY handler
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:34:57PM +0200, Thomas Bork wrote: > Please accept this patch for configure.in, removing the function > introduced in 15508 (Use clock_gettime for profiling timestamps if it is > available. Use the fastest clock available on uniprocessors.): Hmmm. Fully removing it might not be really the right thing. It might however be good to only link in -lrt (and thus the depending pthreads) if --with-profiling-data=yes. James, what do you think? Volker pgpbzCf0G3bV8.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.23rc1 - Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY handler
Volker Lendecke wrote: [2006/05/25 15:25:42, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(247) Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE handler [2006/05/25 15:25:42, 0] smbd/notify_kernel.c:kernel_notify_init(224) Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY handler Is this a change from pre1? I'm not aware of any changes. Can we get a debug level 10 log and an strace of such a message? Volker debugged this on my machine with following results (hope I understand it correct): 3.0.23rc1 uses 'AC_LIBTESTFUNC(rt, clock_gettime)' in configure.in, which leads to an smbd linked against pthreads which leads to an confused smbd which cannot SIGRTMIN. Without this function smbd isn't linked to pthreads anymore and linux oplocks are available with glibc 2.2.5 and kernel 2.4.26-1. Please accept this patch for configure.in, removing the function introduced in 15508 (Use clock_gettime for profiling timestamps if it is available. Use the fastest clock available on uniprocessors.): --- configure.in.orgSun May 28 19:22:51 2006 +++ configure.inSun May 28 19:22:57 2006 @@ -2024,8 +2024,6 @@ AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY_TZ,1,[Whether gettimeofday() is available]) fi -AC_LIBTESTFUNC(rt, clock_gettime) - AC_CACHE_CHECK([for va_copy],samba_cv_HAVE_VA_COPY,[ AC_TRY_LINK([#include va_list ap1,ap2;], [va_copy(ap1,ap2);], der tom -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] any plans on getting psexec / cmdat equivalent to Samba?
How about ssh? ssh host ls David Shapiro Distributed Systems Unix Team Lead office: 919-765-2011 cellphone: 730-0538 >>> "roland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/26/2006 6:39:45 PM >>> Hello ! If anybody want`s to implement the psexec unix port or samba equivalent, maybe taking a look at xCmd from Zoltan Csizmadia at http://www.codeguru.com/Cpp/I-N/network/remoteinvocation/article.php/c5433/ may help a LOT and is a very good example. (This one seems to work similar like psexec - but it is available with sourcecode!) I don`t know if the author is still reachable via this mail adress or if there is any chance to get some help with "creating the xCMD/psexec equivalent for linux", but I CC'ed him with this mail to say "thank you for making it and for providing the source". regards roland k. systems engineer List: samba Subject:[Samba] any plans on getting psexec / cmdat equivalent to Samba? From: Tomasz Chmielewski Date: 2006-03-22 11:00:23 Message-ID: 44212E47.4040300 () wpkg ! org [Download message RAW] Windows admins can make their work easier with a tool like psexec. It allows to execute commands remotely, without the need to install anything on the target machine. All that is needed is username/password of course. Unfortunately, psexec command only runs on Windows. The usage is as follows (we start notepad interactively with -i to show that something happens): psexec \\192.168.1.2 -i -u username -p password notepad It waits for the command to complete, and returns its exit code, so can be used within scripts. A similar tool we can use with Samba is cmdat, which comes together with samba-tng (one just needs to compile samba-tng, and then can use the tool with a "regular" Samba). To start a command on a remote system, we can use (we start notepad interactively with /interactive to show that something happens): cmdat -I 192.168.1.2 -U 'username%password' -c 'at now /interactive notepdad' Unfortunately, it uses at to start commands (1 minute from the current time when we use "now"), so we know nothing about the status of the running command, nor get any exit code. In other words, it's close to impossible to use it in scripts to do anything useful (other than starting single commands). Is any work done in Samba to get a tool similar to psexec? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] RE: Samba 3.0.20, pam_winbind broken?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > However, you seem to imply that this is a known > bug, with no workaround other than a (potential) > backport of code from 3.0.23rc1? A backport would be really intrusive. It's a fair amount of code. Simo's right though. I'm pretty sure this is fixed in 3.0.23rc1. If you could at least test 3.0.23rc1 and make sure it meets your needs it would be appreciated. cheers, jerry = Samba--- http://www.samba.org Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEeZY4IR7qMdg1EfYRAqPrAJ4nShK1hVlk1uG5CXoKIFxLWjUwlQCgj5EU R6mZhaB4cUQZxWeMwUSKXOI= =4e3H -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] User Manager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:44:12AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: >> I've used User Manager with no issues from the prereleases of 3.0 >> through 3.0.6. I have a need to upgrade samba so I installed 3.0.22. >> Now, User Manager complains that the "stub received bad data". Not much >> in the logs indicate an issue. >> >> Any ideas as to what's wrong or how to debug it? I use LDAP as the backend. > > Please open a bug report at https://bugzilla.samba.org and > upload debug level 10 smbd logs and a network trace of > usrmgr.exe operation up to the failure. But please retest against 3.0.23rc1 first. cheers, jerry = Samba--- http://www.samba.org Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEeZVwIR7qMdg1EfYRAsKGAJ9KSEaQyCa9lufZYqVcl8p/oeD8hwCgzxSO 71Evz3ZF7nH/Z01QMs04fkE= =eU8j -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] sigbus fault ?
Hi Folks, I'm trying to run samba on Solaris 9. It works OK when I don't compile in kerberos and ldap, but when with those two compiled in, smbd seems to freeze (nmbd and winbindd are OK). After a bit of investigation I notice something strange in truss: ... /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: -> libldap-2.3:ldap_free_urldesc(0x30dfe8, 0x32e048, 0x32dfb8, 0x3 /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: -> liblber-2.3:ber_memfree_x(0x32dfd7, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: -> libc:free(0x32dfd7, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: -> libc:_free_unlocked(0x32dfd7, 0x0, 0x0, 0xfee3c000) /1: Incurred fault #5, FLTACCESS %pc = 0xFEDC7D80 /1: siginfo: SIGBUS BUS_ADRALN addr=0x0032DFCF ^^^ /1: Received signal #10, SIGBUS [caught] /1: siginfo: SIGBUS BUS_ADRALN addr=0x0032DFCF /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: -> libc:sigaddset(0xffbfd594, 0xa, 0x0, 0x0) /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: -> libc:sigvalid(0xa, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: <- libc:sigvalid() = 1 /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: <- libc:sigaddset() = 0 /1: sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0xFFBFD594, 0x) = 0 /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: -> libc:___errno(0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: <- libc:___errno() = 0xfee43664 /[EMAIL PROTECTED]: -> libc:time(0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) ... And the same sort of thing in gdb: (gdb) run Starting program: /opt/Samba/samba-3.0.22-with-ADS/sbin/smbd Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xfedc7d80 in _free_unlocked () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) bt #0 0xfedc7d80 in _free_unlocked () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #1 0xfedc7d38 in free () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #2 0xff32d848 in ldap_free_urldesc (ludp=0x30dfc0) at url.c:1481 #3 0xfebe6ed0 in __s_api_addRefInfo () from /usr/lib/libsldap.so.1 #4 0xfebea200 in proc_search_references () from /usr/lib/libsldap.so.1 #5 0xfebeac94 in search_state_machine () from /usr/lib/libsldap.so.1 #6 0xfebeb4bc in __ns_ldap_list () from /usr/lib/libsldap.so.1 #7 0xfec2ad10 in _nss_ldap_nocb_lookup () from /usr/lib/nss_ldap.so.1 #8 0xfec24868 in getbymember () from /usr/lib/nss_ldap.so.1 #9 0xfedce8f0 in nss_search () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #10 0xfee18d30 in _getgroupsbymember () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #11 0xfedc3264 in initgroups () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #12 0x001ab280 in getgrouplist_internals () #13 0x001ab528 in sys_getgrouplist () #14 0x001ab580 in getgroups_user () #15 0x001ab6cc in pdb_default_enum_group_memberships () #16 0x0018f22c in context_enum_group_memberships () #17 0x0019136c in pdb_enum_group_memberships () #18 0x00202d90 in get_user_groups () #19 0x0020317c in add_user_groups () #20 0x002034b8 in make_server_info_sam () #21 0x0020387c in make_new_server_info_guest () #22 0x00203a30 in init_guest_info () #23 0x0024e0b0 in main () Here is my smb.conf: [global] server string = IT151978 Solaris guest account = eirvine log level = 3 preferred master = No local master = No domain master = No [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No browseable = No Here is what smbd is linked against: ldd sbin/smbd libthread.so.1 =>/usr/lib/libthread.so.1 libldap-2.3.so.0 => /opt/OpenLDAP/openldap/lib/libldap-2.3.so.0 liblber-2.3.so.0 => /opt/OpenLDAP/openldap/lib/liblber-2.3.so.0 libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /opt/Kerberos/krb5-1.4.3/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so. 2 libkrb5.so.3 => /opt/Kerberos/krb5-1.4.3/lib/libkrb5.so.3 libk5crypto.so.3 => /opt/Kerberos/krb5-1.4.3/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 libkrb5support.so.0 => /opt/Kerberos/krb5-1.4.3/lib/libkrb5support.so. 0 libcom_err.so.3 => /opt/Kerberos/krb5-1.4.3/lib/libcom_err.so.3 libresolv.so.2 =>/usr/lib/libresolv.so.2 libsocket.so.1 =>/usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 libpam.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpam.so.1 libsendfile.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsendfile.so.1 libdl.so.1 =>/usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libiconv.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2 libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libgen.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgen.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1 => /opt/sfw/gcc-3/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 libmp.so.2 =>/usr/lib/libmp.so.2 libcmd.so.1 => /usr/lib/libcmd.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-100/lib/libc_psr.so.1 Any ideas of what to do next would be very much appreciated! Thanks Eddie -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] any plans on getting psexec / cmdat equivalent to Samba?
Hello ! If anybody want`s to implement the psexec unix port or samba equivalent, maybe taking a look at xCmd from Zoltan Csizmadia at http://www.codeguru.com/Cpp/I-N/network/remoteinvocation/article.php/c5433/ may help a LOT and is a very good example. (This one seems to work similar like psexec - but it is available with sourcecode!) I don`t know if the author is still reachable via this mail adress or if there is any chance to get some help with "creating the xCMD/psexec equivalent for linux", but I CC'ed him with this mail to say "thank you for making it and for providing the source". regards roland k. systems engineer List: samba Subject:[Samba] any plans on getting psexec / cmdat equivalent to Samba? From: Tomasz Chmielewski Date: 2006-03-22 11:00:23 Message-ID: 44212E47.4040300 () wpkg ! org [Download message RAW] Windows admins can make their work easier with a tool like psexec. It allows to execute commands remotely, without the need to install anything on the target machine. All that is needed is username/password of course. Unfortunately, psexec command only runs on Windows. The usage is as follows (we start notepad interactively with -i to show that something happens): psexec \\192.168.1.2 -i -u username -p password notepad It waits for the command to complete, and returns its exit code, so can be used within scripts. A similar tool we can use with Samba is cmdat, which comes together with samba-tng (one just needs to compile samba-tng, and then can use the tool with a "regular" Samba). To start a command on a remote system, we can use (we start notepad interactively with /interactive to show that something happens): cmdat -I 192.168.1.2 -U 'username%password' -c 'at now /interactive notepdad' Unfortunately, it uses at to start commands (1 minute from the current time when we use "now"), so we know nothing about the status of the running command, nor get any exit code. In other words, it's close to impossible to use it in scripts to do anything useful (other than starting single commands). Is any work done in Samba to get a tool similar to psexec? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Integrating W2k3 Terminal Services w/Samba
I've got a Samba (3.0.14a) controlled domain that contains 1 Windows 2003 Server as a member server. I've been thinking about using Terminal Services from that machine to allow roaming users (ie, those outside of the office) to connect to our network and get work done. My only concern at this point how to deal with the lack of an Active Directory and still allow Terminal Services to function. I've done some searching and even ran across a post that said at least one person had it working. I'm not concerned about roaming profiles, I just want the connectivity. No, I haven't tried to make any og this happen, I'm just asking if someone out there already has it working. And if so, how much of a headache it was to get working. Thanks in advance. -- Kevin L. Collins, MCSE Systems Manager Nesbitt Engineering, Inc. Please note my new email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: Re: Excel file
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.fogdog.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.fogdog.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.fogdog.com Original Message Follows: Please read the attached file. [ Attachment 1.2Type: application/octet-stream] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] usrmgr.exe "group name could not be found" error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom wrote: > It seems the 3.0.23rc1 version has fixed this issue > on my PDC. Excellent! Thanks for the testing and feedback. cheers, jerry = Samba--- http://www.samba.org Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEeYqoIR7qMdg1EfYRApgrAJ9njKJtowjoLFLPUdDtP6unmxLuLgCg1xsf w2cwd9BNha84cAXIWjzm4MI= =Azhe -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE [Samba] Failover LDAP?
Samba 3 By Example Chapter 6. Figure 6.3. Samba Configuration to Use a Dual (Fail-over) LDAP Server passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://master.abmas.biz \ ldapsam:ldap://slave.abmas.biz Cheers, Adrian Sender. From: Golden Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Samba Mailing List Subject: [Samba] Failover LDAP? Sent: Friday, 26 May 2006 1:41:19 PM Okay, I've searched around on this, but can't find any examples or docs. Is there a way to specify a second ldap server in the smb.conf, in case the primary ldap server fails or become unreachable? - Delamatrix -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
