Re: [Samba] samba machine accounts problem

2009-04-16 Thread Ray Klassen
>
> only ou=users, need i a second one for hosts? can i do this belated?
>


yes to (1) and I think yes to (2)...
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] Question about BUILTIN\Administrators and BUILTIN\Users nested groups in 3.3.3

2009-04-16 Thread Dorrian, William M
Sorry about the dumb question:

Are the "BUILTIN\Administrators" and "BUILTIN\Users" local (nested) groups
supposed to be populated with DOMAINNAME\Domain Administrators and
DOMAINNAME\Domain Users (respectively) by default? If I download the Redhat
Samba package, they are populated. Not so with a compiled version.

I've had a helluva time populating BUILTIN\Administrators and BUILTIN\Users,
even using "net sam addmem". I'm guessing that it is something I'm doing
wrong.

My compile options are:

--with-acl-support --with-configdir=/etc --with-winbind --with-ads --with-pam
--with-ldap=/usr/local/openldap


Thanks,
Bill D.



"Give a man a fish and you've freed him up for the day to write a poem,
compose a song, or howl at the Gods. Teach a man to fish and you've doomed
him to a lifetime as a fisherman."

-Rodney Anonymous
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Problem with Samba and Windows Terminal Server 2008

2009-04-16 Thread Eric Roseme



Ron Daniel wrote:

Hello all,

We have a Windows 2008 Terminal Server which people connect into to run their programs. 
We are getting upwards of 60 people connecting in at any time. We are seeing error 
messages from the application complaining that it can't access one of the files on one of 
the shares.  I have read that this problem is likely to be due to the fact that we run 
one machine as a terminal server and there is only one netbios host being used by 
mutliple people. The paper I have read from HP refers to registry key called 
"MultiUserEnabled" on earlier versions of windows terminal server needs to be 
set to 1 in order for the father smbd process to recognise different sessions connecting 
from the one host.

The paper is at http://www.docs.hp.com/en/12131/Samba-TerminalServer_106.pdf

Oops - that's my paper.  Sorry, I have not looked at 2008 for the 
parameter yet.  FYI - for both 2000 and 2003 Microsoft delayed rolling 
it forward for a few years.  Many customers were left hanging both 
times.  So it is possible that the parm is not on 2008 - I did a quick 
google and did not get any hits, but they have changed the name for each 
release, so that is not definitive.


I'll look around this afternoon and see if there are any clues that 2008 
has a newly-named mulit-user parm.


Eric Roseme

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] samba machine accounts problem

2009-04-16 Thread Adam Williams

is nss_ldap configured to search for posix accounts in ou=hosts?

Sven Buchstaller wrote:

Hi list

samba3-3.0.31-36
openldap2-2.3.43-1.1

my problem is i have stop my working openldap and restart it again, in
the Log i see now = pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account
for ... a lot of machine accounts.
Whats wrong? i must now all accounts rejoin to domain? 


example from a host

# bart$, hosts, server.intern
dn: uid=bart$,ou=hosts,dc=server,dc=intern
objectClass: sambaSamAccount
objectClass: posixAccount<---unix account ?
objectClass: account
sambaDomainName: srv01
displayName: bart
sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-3991578539-3149662252-1894531253-515
sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3991578539-3149662252-1894531253-101524
gidNumber: 515
loginShell: /bin/false
homeDirectory: /dev/null
uid: bart$
cn: bart
uidNumber: 50262
sambaPwdCanChange: 1196710001
sambaPwdMustChange: 1204486001
sambaAcctFlags: [WX ]
sambaPwdLastSet: 1238649797

# search result
search: 2
result: 0 Success




mfg sven

  


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] [Release Planning 3.4] 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed

2009-04-16 Thread Adam Williams



Peter Rindfuss wrote:


I can confirm this. For testing purposes, I installed a "fresh" WinXP
SP2 on a PC. I had no problems to join this machine to 3.2.10, but after
the next login, the problems showed up as described.

Peter

  


I can also confirms it happens on Vista Business 32-bit.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] unable to manage users with uermgr

2009-04-16 Thread Ivo Karabojkov

Hi all!

I have problem adding new user with User manager for domains. When I
click "Add" I got the following message:
This security ID may not be assigned as the primary group of an object
Managing users (setting passwords, profile location, etc.) works fine,
as works adding new machines to the domain.
My OS is FreeBSD 7.1, Samba 3.2, passdb backend is tdbsam and the
configuration is very similar to "secure office network" chapter from
"Samba by Example".

Thanks in advance for your kind cooperation.


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: [Release Planning 3.4] 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed

2009-04-16 Thread Guenther Deschner
Remy Zandwijk wrote:
> Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:41:20PM +0200, Karolin Seeger wrote:
>>> Hey folks,
>>>
>>> the release of Samba 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed until April 30, 2009
>>> due to
>>> the samr access check bugs and bug #6263 (Domain login problems in
>>> Windows
>>> XP without SP3).
>>>
>>> @Developers: There is still some space left to place your changes in the
>>> release notes.
>>
>> Karolin, Guenther has fixed #6263 and I am waiting on confirmation
>> on my checked in fixes for the samr access check bugs.
>>
>> Just FYI. Thanks for pointing out the problems for us. Please
>> let us know if there are any other show-stoppers you need us
>> to work on asap.
> 
> Great news. Any change a patch will be made available to apply to 3.2.10?

You can just pick the fix for Bug 6263 from the Bugzilla entry:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4070&action=view

Guenther

-- 
Günther DeschnerGPG-ID: 8EE11688
Red Hat gdesch...@redhat.com
Samba Team  g...@samba.org
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Failed to join win2008 domain when "server ldap signing is required".

2009-04-16 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:07:45AM -0700, Ephi Dror wrote:
> PS: unfortunately, we can't switch to samba 3.2.x or 3.3.x
> at the moment to avoid doing tls in the first place.

I'm afraid you will have to upgrade.

Volker


pgp1npuWyE5dP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Re: [Release Planning 3.4] 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed

2009-04-16 Thread Remy Zandwijk

Jeremy Allison wrote:

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:41:20PM +0200, Karolin Seeger wrote:

Hey folks,

the release of Samba 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed until April 30, 2009 due to
the samr access check bugs and bug #6263 (Domain login problems in Windows
XP without SP3).

@Developers: There is still some space left to place your changes in the
release notes.


Karolin, Guenther has fixed #6263 and I am waiting on confirmation
on my checked in fixes for the samr access check bugs.

Just FYI. Thanks for pointing out the problems for us. Please
let us know if there are any other show-stoppers you need us
to work on asap.


Great news. Any change a patch will be made available to apply to 3.2.10?

Thanks
Remy

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba