[Samba] Implementing Samba4
Hi I am trying to install Samba 4 on a Ubuntu 10.04 Server machine. I have downloaded the sources, compiled it and installed. Now I have to do the provision step. I want to use an existing LDAP server (389 Directory Server) installed in other machine (well, really a lot of machines, yet configured for replication). Also, the servers only accept SSL connections. But all the examples I have seen in the Samba Wiki use ldapi. I have tried a lot of commands to configure the provisioning, but I don't understand what this step does: - Create any special user in the LDAP server? - Create any branches in the LDAP server? - Add any schema? What should be the command to make Samba work with my LDAP servers, with SSL? The LDAP servers also have yet user and group data (also Samba3 domain, but it is not being used). After the provisioning, I have seen that is needed to start the LDAP server using start-slapd of the Samba package. What? What is this for? And one last question, is it possible to create interdomain trust with the current version of Samba4? Regards and thanks in advance. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Implementing Samba4
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:42:45 +0200, Juan Asensio Sánchez oke...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I am trying to install Samba 4 on a Ubuntu 10.04 Server machine. I have downloaded the sources, compiled it and installed. Now I have to do the provision step. I want to use an existing LDAP server (389 Directory Server) installed in other machine (well, really a lot of machines, yet configured for replication). Also, the servers only accept SSL connections. But all the Why do not just use the samba 4 internal ldap-server?? And just net rpc vampire the users and groups from the sanba3/Ldap?? I think with samba 4 the old way samba3/ldap just makes no sense at all. What should be the advantage of the old way?? Greetings Daniel examples I have seen in the Samba Wiki use ldapi. I have tried a lot of commands to configure the provisioning, but I don't understand what this step does: - Create any special user in the LDAP server? - Create any branches in the LDAP server? - Add any schema? What should be the command to make Samba work with my LDAP servers, with SSL? The LDAP servers also have yet user and group data (also Samba3 domain, but it is not being used). After the provisioning, I have seen that is needed to start the LDAP server using start-slapd of the Samba package. What? What is this for? And one last question, is it possible to create interdomain trust with the current version of Samba4? Regards and thanks in advance. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] MSDFS feature not working in samba 3.3.12
Hi I downloaded samba 3.3.12 and installed it in Aix6l with following configuration option: ./configure --without-libaddns--without-libsmbsharemodes --with-acl-support --without-ldap --without-utmp --with-libiconv=/usr --with-winbind. Now When I am trying to set host msdfs = yes ,and want to use MSDFS feature It doesn't show me any message but also it does not work. My conf file is like [global] security = user host msdfs = yes [t2] path = /t2 msdfs root = yes public = yes [samba] path = /samba and in /t2 I made a link by following command : ln -s msdfs:machine2\\share dir. Can any one tell me where I am doing wrong and provide me solution to set msdfs feature on in samba 3.3.12. However when I tried same process with samba 3.2.0 It works fine. Thanks T -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Implementing Samba4
El 1 de septiembre de 2010 09:54, Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.deescribió: On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:42:45 +0200, Juan Asensio Sánchez oke...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I am trying to install Samba 4 on a Ubuntu 10.04 Server machine. I have downloaded the sources, compiled it and installed. Now I have to do the provision step. I want to use an existing LDAP server (389 Directory Server) installed in other machine (well, really a lot of machines, yet configured for replication). Also, the servers only accept SSL connections. But all the Why do not just use the samba 4 internal ldap-server?? And just net rpc vampire the users and groups from the sanba3/Ldap?? I think with samba 4 the old way samba3/ldap just makes no sense at all. What should be the advantage of the old way?? Greetings Daniel We have more than 60 LDAP servers already workin, with custom schemas, and lot of users and groups, so I think the migration is not trivial. Also, our LDAP servers are not used only for Samba, and I think 389 DS is more appropiate for high load environments. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Problem in setting MSDFS feature in samba 3.3.12
Hi I downloaded samba 3.3.12 and installed it in Aix6l with following configuration option: ./configure --without-libaddns--without-libsmbsharemodes --with-acl-support --without-ldap --without-utmp --with-libiconv=/usr --with-winbind. Now When I am trying to set host msdfs = yes ,and want to use MSDFS feature It doesn't show me any message but also it does not work. My conf file is like [global] security = user host msdfs = yes [t2] path = /t2 msdfs root = yes public = yes [samba] path = /samba and in /t2 I made a link by following command : ln -s msdfs:machine2\\share dir. Can any one tell me where I am doing wrong and provide me solution to set msdfs feature on in samba 3.3.12. However when I tried same process with samba 3.2.0 It works fine. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] failed to set machine spn: Operations error
On 31 August 2010 18:15, rajat swarup raj...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:21 PM, rajat swarup raj...@gmail.com wrote: I have samba, winbind, kerberos installed on an ubuntu server. I have a windows server 2003 based domain. when i try to execute the following command: net ads join -U user net ads join is valid for Samba 3, but not Samba 4 (which I see you have installed). In future you should mention the version of Samba and Ubuntu etc. that you are using and it's normally a good idea to include your smb.conf file too. I get the following error: Failed to join domain: failed to set machine spn: Operations error Kerberos authentication works fine and I can get the kerberos ticket just fine. This setup was working fine earlier. I was able to authenticate to the windows server This started happening when I upgraded the samba version using aptitude. Also I get the following error when I restart the samba daemon (/etc/init.d/samba4 start) ^^^ Uninstall Samba 4 and install Samba 3 instead. Samba4 is still alpha. There's an old, experimental version in Ubuntu 10.04, but I don't think it's what you want. Unknown enumerated value 'ads' for 'security' This is an option that is valid for Samba 3, but not for Samba 4. -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Implementing Samba4
Hi 2010/9/1 Juan Asensio Sánchez oke...@gmail.com: El 1 de septiembre de 2010 09:54, Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.deescribió: On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:42:45 +0200, Juan Asensio Sánchez oke...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I am trying to install Samba 4 on a Ubuntu 10.04 Server machine. I have downloaded the sources, compiled it and installed. Now I have to do the provision step. I want to use an existing LDAP server (389 Directory Server) I believe Samba4 currently does not work correctly with an external LDAP server. installed in other machine (well, really a lot of machines, yet configured for replication). Also, the servers only accept SSL connections. But all the Why do not just use the samba 4 internal ldap-server?? And just net rpc vampire the users and groups from I doubt net rpc vampire will do anything except give you an error message :) I believe the rpc vs. ads etc. options are considered to have been a mistake, so are not supported by Samba4's net command. Also, there is no support currently for vampiring from Samba3 to Samba4. Someone is working on a migration script, though. Check the samba-technical archives. the sanba3/Ldap?? I think with samba 4 the old way samba3/ldap just makes no sense at all. What should be the advantage of the old way?? Greetings Daniel We have more than 60 LDAP servers already workin, with custom schemas, and lot of users and groups, so I think the migration is not trivial. Also, our LDAP servers are not used only for Samba, and I think 389 DS is more appropiate for high load environments. I've Cc'd the samba-technical list, someone there might have useful comments. -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Examples for smbldap
Check the Samba-HOWTO that comes with the samba-doc package. It has several good examples that should get you pointed in the right direction. Chris On 08/31/2010 03:16 PM, John McMonagle wrote: What is a good reference samba pdc with smbldap? Originally used Samba-3 by Example but do not know if that is still current. My current samba domain controllers that were set up about 5 years ago are still broken after doing a lot of fixes. Looks like there have been some changes since I first set up and like to compare what I have to reference. In case it's matters running debian lenny samba 3.2.5-4 smbldap 0.9.4-1 slapd 2.4.11-1 John -- Christopher Springer IS/IT Systems Administrator BRC Rubber Plastics, Inc Office: 260-693-2171 x389 Cell: 260-750-2929 csprin...@brcrp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] permissions question
On Tue Aug 31 2010 22:54:17 GMT+0200 Han Solo gforums2...@gmail.com wrote: I have a samba share that has the following permissions: create mask = 0775 force create mode = 0664 directory create mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0764 5.) I have a basic .txt file I created on my windows desktop by right-clickingnewtext document. I copy that file over to the share in question it gets the following permission: -rwxr--r-- where is it getting that permission from as I'm expecting it to have 0775 or 0664 permisions neither is coming over. I'm experiencing a similar problem (see my post at http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-August/157775.html). Could you please try the following: - set your create mask and force create mode both to 664; this should result in 664 for all new files (the first removes all bits that are not in 664, and the latter adds all bits still missing to 664) - create a text file on your share; according to your statement the permissions should be different from 664 - in windows, open the security settings for that file and change something, e.g. give the group full access; if it's the same issue as mine, it shouldn't really matter what you change - confirm and close the security settings - now look at the permissions on your linux machine; do they fit your presets now? With best regards, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] permissions question
On Tue Aug 31 2010 23:02:26 GMT+0200 Nicolas Jungers nico...@jungers.net wrote: a mask is a removal of bit in the permission, so you get that a bit wrong :-) say you have permissions of 777 which in binary is 111-111-111 and a mask of 022 which is 000-010-010 you have to do the following to get the final permissions: 111-111-111 - 000-010-010 = 111-101-101 which is 755 N. According to the manual your example is not right. The create mask will be logically ANDed with the current/default permissions and the force create mode will be ORed. For your example that means: 111-111-111 AND 000-010-010 = 000-010-010 It is right that the create mask removes bits, but not the way you showed it. The manual says about create mask: Any bit not set here will be removed from the modes set on a file when it is created. Because the force create mode will be ORed, it adds bits. These bits are guaranteed to be set on the file. Extended example with force create mode of 110-100-100: 111-111-111 AND 000-010-010 (create mask) = 000-010-010 OR 110-100-100 (force create mode) = 110-110-110 With best regards, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] samba-3.5.4: compilation fails on RHAS5U5
hello I tried to compile samba on Redhat AS5U5 but it fails with this message: Install: cannot stat `source3/bin/umount.cifs': No such file or directory. Any solution? kind regards werner maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] user permissions
Hello, I have a problem about reaching my share folder when the permission is 750 but whenever I change it to 755 I can see the content of the folder. for 750 I get this result: smbclient //serverip/sharename -U username smb: \ ls NT_STATUS_NETWORK_ACCESS_DENIED listing \* 0 blocks of size 0. 9 blocks available smb: \ but for 755 everything is fine but of course I don't get any write permission. Doesn't it mean that my samba user is seem as other? if yes what could be the reason? It comes to me, something goes terribly wrong. Thanks in advance Murat Can Tuna -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] permissions question
On 2010-09-01 15:00, alexr wrote: On Tue Aug 31 2010 23:02:26 GMT+0200 Nicolas Jungers nico...@jungers.net wrote: a mask is a removal of bit in the permission, so you get that a bit wrong :-) say you have permissions of 777 which in binary is 111-111-111 and a mask of 022 which is 000-010-010 you have to do the following to get the final permissions: 111-111-111 - 000-010-010 = 111-101-101 which is 755 N. According to the manual your example is not right. The create mask will be logically ANDed with the current/default permissions and the force create mode will be ORed. For your example that means: 111-111-111 AND 000-010-010 = 000-010-010 It is right that the create mask removes bits, but not the way you showed it. The manual says about create mask: Any bit not set here will be removed from the modes set on a file when it is created. Because the force create mode will be ORed, it adds bits. These bits are guaranteed to be set on the file. Extended example with force create mode of 110-100-100: 111-111-111 AND 000-010-010 (create mask) = 000-010-010 OR 110-100-100 (force create mode) = 110-110-110 You're right. I've confused create mask and umask. N. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] failed to set machine spn: Operations error
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: Uninstall Samba 4 and install Samba 3 instead. I uninstalled samba4 and installed samba3. The samba daemon now starts without the error I was getting before (Unknown enumerated value 'ads' for 'security'). Thanks! But I still get the following error when I try to execute net ads join. Failed to join domain: failed to set machine spn: Operations error net rpc join works perfectly (Message: Joined domain DOMAINNAME) but net ads join gives me the above error. Thanks, -- Rajat Swarup www.rajatswarup.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] failed to set machine spn: Operations error
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:18 AM, rajat swarup raj...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: Uninstall Samba 4 and install Samba 3 instead. I uninstalled samba4 and installed samba3. The samba daemon now starts without the error I was getting before (Unknown enumerated value 'ads' for 'security'). Thanks! But I still get the following error when I try to execute net ads join. Failed to join domain: failed to set machine spn: Operations error net rpc join works perfectly (Message: Joined domain DOMAINNAME) but net ads join gives me the above error. Thanks, -- Rajat Swarup www.rajatswarup.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Transparent File Caching
This is not really a samba question, but if anyone would know that answer, it would be this group. :) Are there any Open Source projects that offer network file caching for SMB/CIFS? Something like what Squid does for HTTP. If not, do you think it would be difficult to position Samba into such a role? We are going to use Cisco WAAS for branch locations, but I think the cache in the devices may not be enough for some locations. Food for thought if nothing else :) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Implementing Samba4
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:00:29 +0200, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2010/9/1 Juan Asensio Sánchez oke...@gmail.com: El 1 de septiembre de 2010 09:54, Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.deescribió: On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:42:45 +0200, Juan Asensio Sánchez oke...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I am trying to install Samba 4 on a Ubuntu 10.04 Server machine. I have downloaded the sources, compiled it and installed. Now I have to do the provision step. I want to use an existing LDAP server (389 Directory Server) I believe Samba4 currently does not work correctly with an external LDAP server. installed in other machine (well, really a lot of machines, yet configured for replication). Also, the servers only accept SSL connections. But all the Why do not just use the samba 4 internal ldap-server?? And just net rpc vampire the users and groups from I doubt net rpc vampire will do anything except give you an error message :) I believe the rpc vs. ads etc. options are considered to have been a mistake, so are not supported by Samba4's net command. Also, there is no support currently for vampiring from Samba3 to Samba4. Someone is working on a migration script, though. Check the How about: 2 Samba4-DCs with OpenLDAP 2.4.8 in Multi-Master-Replication at: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2008-April/058567.html samba-technical archives. the sanba3/Ldap?? I think with samba 4 the old way samba3/ldap just makes no sense at all. What should be the advantage of the old way?? Greetings Daniel We have more than 60 LDAP servers already workin, with custom schemas, and lot of users and groups, so I think the migration is not trivial. Also, our LDAP servers are not used only for Samba, and I think 389 DS is more appropiate for high load environments. I've Cc'd the samba-technical list, someone there might have useful comments. -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Set ACLs on Samba share from Windows
Okay, let's try this again. I have a Samba server, joined to my Windows Active Directory domain, and I'm having a problem setting ACLs on a share from Windows. On Windows, I get the error message Unable to save permission changes on folder. The parameter is incorrect. and when I look in my Samba log, I see the message ACL is invalid for set (Invalid argument). I'm using Fedora 13 with the stock Samba, version 3.5.4. Everything works (joining the domain, accessing files, etc.), except setting ACLs from Windows. getent passwd and getent group return both local and AD users and groups, respectively. Setting up user mappings doesn't solve the problem. My underlying filesystem supports extended attributes, as you can see by looking at the attached section, getfacl output. Currently, I'm trying to get more information, by compiling Samba from source and adding debug statements, but I'm having some trouble, so I won't be able to post any information from that effort, yet. (My compiled version won't join the domain, even though I'm using the same configuration file.) I've also dug into some of the Samba source and discovered the error is coming from a function named acl_valid, which is called from smb_acl_to_posix, in the file vfs_posixacl.c. I'll admit I'm no expert on POSIX ACLs, but I have to wonder if there's a bug in the Linux ACL functions, since smb_acl_to_posix uses *only* ACL functions to manipulate the ACL, and someone else in this group said that very same function works on Solaris. Does this work for anyone out there, using a Linux system? Thanks = getfacl output # owner: My domain\134user1 # group: My domain\134mis user::rwx user:My domain\134me:rwx user:My domain\134administrator:rwx user:My domain\134user2:rwx user:My domain\134user3:rwx group::rwx group:My domain\134accounting:rwx mask::rwx other::rwx default:user::rwx default:user:My domain\134user1:rwx default:user:My domain\134administrator:rwx default:user:My domain\134user2:rwx default:user:My domain\134user3:rwx default:group::--- default:mask::rwx default:other::--- = testparm -sv output Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section [homes] Processing section [printers] Processing section [paperport] Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER [global] dos charset = CP850 unix charset = UTF-8 display charset = LOCALE workgroup = My domain realm = My domain.LOCAL netbios name = PPTEST netbios aliases = netbios scope = server string = Samba Server Version %v interfaces = bind interfaces only = No security = ADS auth methods = encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = No client schannel = Auto server schannel = Auto allow trusted domains = Yes map to guest = Never null passwords = No obey pam restrictions = No password server = * smb passwd file = /var/lib/samba/private/smbpasswd private dir = /var/lib/samba/private passdb backend = tdbsam algorithmic rid base = 1000 root directory = guest account = nobody enable privileges = Yes pam password change = No passwd program = passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed* passwd chat debug = No passwd chat timeout = 2 check password script = username map = /etc/samba/smbusers password level = 0 username level = 0 unix password sync = No restrict anonymous = 0 lanman auth = No ntlm auth = Yes client NTLMv2 auth = No client lanman auth = No client plaintext auth = No preload modules = dedicated keytab file = kerberos method = default map untrusted to domain = No log level = 3 winbind:3 acls:3 idmap:10 syslog = 1 syslog only = No log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 debug timestamp = Yes debug prefix timestamp = No debug hires timestamp = Yes debug pid = No debug uid = No debug class = No enable core files = Yes smb ports = 445 139 large readwrite = Yes max protocol = NT1 min protocol = CORE min receivefile size = 0 read raw = Yes write raw = Yes disable netbios = No reset on zero vc = No acl compatibility = auto defer sharing violations = Yes nt pipe support = Yes nt status support = Yes announce version = 4.9 announce as = NT max mux = 50 max xmit = 16644 name resolve order = lmhosts wins host bcast max ttl = 259200
Re: [Samba] failed to set machine spn: Operations error
On 1 September 2010 17:18, rajat swarup raj...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: Uninstall Samba 4 and install Samba 3 instead. I uninstalled samba4 and installed samba3. The samba daemon now starts without the error I was getting before (Unknown enumerated value 'ads' for 'security'). Thanks! No problem :) But I still get the following error when I try to execute net ads join. Failed to join domain: failed to set machine spn: Operations error net rpc join works perfectly (Message: Joined domain DOMAINNAME) but net ads join gives me the above error. Sorry, I can't help you with that. I have never used net ads join. Perhaps someone else can help. A quick search on google for that error turns up lots of hits, but I have not looked at any to see if there were solutions. -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Implementing Samba4
2010/9/1 Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.de: On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:00:29 +0200, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2010/9/1 Juan Asensio Sánchez oke...@gmail.com: El 1 de septiembre de 2010 09:54, Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.deescribió: [...] Why do not just use the samba 4 internal ldap-server?? And just net rpc vampire the users and groups from I doubt net rpc vampire will do anything except give you an error message :) I believe the rpc vs. ads etc. options are considered to have been a mistake, so are not supported by Samba4's net command. Also, there is no support currently for vampiring from Samba3 to Samba4. Someone is working on a migration script, though. Check the How about: 2 Samba4-DCs with OpenLDAP 2.4.8 in Multi-Master-Replication at: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2008-April/058567.html I think perhaps Samba4 worked better with OpenLDAP in the past and it should also be fixed to work with it again in future, but at the moment it won't work: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2010-July/072445.html For various reasons, the OpenLDAP backend for Samba4 is not functional at this time. Here's the message where Lukasz Zalewski says he's working on the Samba 3 to Samba 4 migration script: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2010-August/072683.html samba-technical archives. -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Set ACLs on Samba share from Windows
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:24:47 +, Dadoo wrote: I've also dug into some of the Samba source and discovered the error is coming from a function named acl_valid, which is called from smb_acl_to_posix, in the file vfs_posixacl.c. I'll admit I'm no expert on POSIX ACLs, but I have to wonder if there's a bug in the Linux ACL functions, since smb_acl_to_posix uses *only* ACL functions to manipulate the ACL, and someone else in this group said that very same function works on Solaris. Does this work for anyone out there, using a Linux system? Okay, now I'm getting somewhere. I finally got my source-compiled version of Samba (mostly) working, and put in a DEBUG statement that calls acl_to_text, right before the call to acl_valid. This is what I got: user::rwx user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx user:2005:rwx user:2006:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- Again, I'm not an ACL expert. Can anyone verify whether or not this is a valid ACL? Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Set ACLs on Samba share from Windows
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:19:25 +, Dadoo wrote: On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:24:47 +, Dadoo wrote: I've also dug into some of the Samba source and discovered the error is coming from a function named acl_valid, which is called from smb_acl_to_posix, in the file vfs_posixacl.c. I'll admit I'm no expert on POSIX ACLs, but I have to wonder if there's a bug in the Linux ACL functions, since smb_acl_to_posix uses *only* ACL functions to manipulate the ACL, and someone else in this group said that very same function works on Solaris. Does this work for anyone out there, using a Linux system? Okay, now I'm getting somewhere. I finally got my source-compiled version of Samba (mostly) working, and put in a DEBUG statement that calls acl_to_text, right before the call to acl_valid. This is what I got: user::rwx user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx user:2005:rwx user:2006:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- Again, I'm not an ACL expert. Can anyone verify whether or not this is a valid ACL? Thanks Well, it's not a bug in the Linux POSIX ACL libraries. According to the man page, it's the occurrence of two user::rwx (ACL_USER_OBJ) strings. In my log output, taken from the for loop in smb_acl_to_posix, you can see that Samba attaches two ACL_USER_OBJ entries to the ACL, even though the POSIX rules require exactly one. Where do I go from here? = Log output Initial ACL is: Iteration 0: ACL type is USER Iteration 0: ACL uid is 2001. ACL after iteration 0 is: user:2001:rwx Iteration 1: ACL type is USER_OBJ ACL after iteration 1 is: user::rwx user:2001:rwx Iteration 2: ACL type is USER Iteration 2: ACL uid is 2003. ACL after iteration 2 is: user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx Iteration 3: ACL type is USER Iteration 3: ACL uid is 2004. ACL after iteration 3 is: user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx Iteration 4: ACL type is USER Iteration 4: ACL uid is 2005. ACL after iteration 4 is: user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx user:2005:rwx Iteration 5: ACL type is USER Iteration 5: ACL uid is 2006. ACL after iteration 5 is: user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx user:2005:rwx user:2006:rwx Iteration 6: ACL type is GROUP_OBJ ACL after iteration 6 is: user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx user:2005:rwx user:2006:rwx group::--- Iteration 7: ACL type is USER_OBJ ACL after iteration 7 is: user::rwx user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx user:2005:rwx user:2006:rwx group::--- Iteration 8: ACL type is OTHER ACL after iteration 8 is: user::rwx user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx user:2005:rwx user:2006:rwx group::--- other::--- Iteration 9: ACL type is MASK ACL after iteration 9 is: user::rwx user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx user:2005:rwx user:2006:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- Final ACL is: user::rwx user::rwx user:2001:rwx user:2003:rwx user:2004:rwx user:2005:rwx user:2006:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Build status as of Wed Sep 1 06:00:02 2010
URL: http://build.samba.org/ --- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2010-08-31 00:00:15.0 -0600 +++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2010-09-01 00:00:18.0 -0600 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -Build status as of Tue Aug 31 06:00:02 2010 +Build status as of Wed Sep 1 06:00:02 2010 Build counts: Tree Total Broken Panic build_farm 0 0 0 ccache 32 2 0 ccache-maint 30 2 0 -ldb 32 10 0 +ldb 32 30 0 libreplace 32 11 0 lorikeet 0 0 0 pidl 18 18 0 @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ samba-docs 0 0 0 samba-web0 0 0 samba_3_current 32 32 4 -samba_3_master 32 31 1 +samba_3_master 32 31 0 samba_3_next 32 32 5 samba_4_0_waf 36 33 0 talloc 32 8 0
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 7afa667 s3-auth: fix uninitialized error code in get_guest_info3().
from e5c7ec6 winreg: add winreg_RestoreKeyFlags to IDL.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 7afa6675ee4bdc7ed914635807c3aef5bec1ae3a
Author: Günther Deschner g...@samba.org
Date: Wed Sep 1 10:51:13 2010 +0200
s3-auth: fix uninitialized error code in get_guest_info3().
Guenther
---
Summary of changes:
source3/auth/auth_util.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/auth/auth_util.c b/source3/auth/auth_util.c
index 3b07bad..1b4a284 100644
--- a/source3/auth/auth_util.c
+++ b/source3/auth/auth_util.c
@@ -639,7 +639,6 @@ static NTSTATUS get_guest_info3(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
struct dom_sid domain_sid;
struct passwd *pwd;
const char *tmp;
- NTSTATUS status;
pwd = getpwnam_alloc(mem_ctx, guest_account);
if (pwd == NULL) {
@@ -677,7 +676,7 @@ static NTSTATUS get_guest_info3(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
info3-base.primary_gid = BUILTIN_RID_GUESTS;
TALLOC_FREE(pwd);
- return status;
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
}
/***
--
Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 5568ced s3-ctdb: ctdbd_init_connection() is static to this file.
from 7afa667 s3-auth: fix uninitialized error code in get_guest_info3().
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 5568ceda47905657b79f7971a3a5eca1ba0cedc1
Author: Günther Deschner g...@samba.org
Date: Wed Sep 1 10:56:17 2010 +0200
s3-ctdb: ctdbd_init_connection() is static to this file.
Guenther
---
Summary of changes:
source3/lib/ctdbd_conn.c |8
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/lib/ctdbd_conn.c b/source3/lib/ctdbd_conn.c
index afc13f2..ff28614 100644
--- a/source3/lib/ctdbd_conn.c
+++ b/source3/lib/ctdbd_conn.c
@@ -1379,12 +1379,4 @@ NTSTATUS ctdb_unwatch(struct ctdbd_connection *conn)
return status;
}
-#else
-
-NTSTATUS ctdbd_init_connection(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
- struct ctdbd_connection **pconn)
-{
- return NT_STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED;
-}
-
#endif
--
Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via d45f901 s4/ldb: fix standalone build
from 5568ced s3-ctdb: ctdbd_init_connection() is static to this file.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit d45f901b9304977f7125fefcfc889076471442b4
Author: Björn Jacke b...@sernet.de
Date: Wed Sep 1 11:22:09 2010 +0200
s4/ldb: fix standalone build
---
Summary of changes:
source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c |8 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c b/source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c
index a885b80..94dd2c6 100644
--- a/source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c
+++ b/source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c
@@ -45,12 +45,16 @@ static struct ldb_cmdline *options;
static void _start_timer(void)
{
- clock_gettime_mono(tp1);
+ if (clock_gettime(CUSTOM_CLOCK_MONOTONIC, tp1) != 0) {
+ clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, tp1);
+ }
}
static double _end_timer(void)
{
- clock_gettime_mono(tp2);
+ if (clock_gettime(CUSTOM_CLOCK_MONOTONIC, tp2) != 0) {
+ clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, tp2);
+ }
return((tp2.tv_sec - tp1.tv_sec) +
(tp2.tv_nsec - tp1.tv_nsec)*1.0e-9);
}
--
Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 5b875a8 s3: Print the IP of the server that stopped responding
from d45f901 s4/ldb: fix standalone build
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 5b875a83a9c641f9e016bd4e83051170f7bd50d0
Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org
Date: Wed Sep 1 12:55:18 2010 +0200
s3: Print the IP of the server that stopped responding
---
Summary of changes:
source3/libsmb/clientgen.c |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/libsmb/clientgen.c b/source3/libsmb/clientgen.c
index 5c6c86d..cdf51c7 100644
--- a/source3/libsmb/clientgen.c
+++ b/source3/libsmb/clientgen.c
@@ -247,7 +247,11 @@ bool cli_receive_smb(struct cli_state *cli)
/* If the server is not responding, note that now */
if (len 0) {
-DEBUG(0, (Receiving SMB: Server stopped responding\n));
+ char addr[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN];
+
+ print_sockaddr(addr, sizeof(addr), cli-dest_ss);
+DEBUG(0, (Receiving SMB: Server %s stopped responding\n,
+ addr));
close(cli-fd);
cli-fd = -1;
return false;
--
Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-6-test updated
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via b374345 s3: Print the IP of the server that stopped responding
from 958fb53 s3: messaging_ctdbd_connection() was only called with
procid_self()
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test
- Log -
commit b374345ef66393a391ca6019da78f7952a29c37e
Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org
Date: Wed Sep 1 12:55:18 2010 +0200
s3: Print the IP of the server that stopped responding
---
Summary of changes:
source3/libsmb/clientgen.c |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/libsmb/clientgen.c b/source3/libsmb/clientgen.c
index c530c14..11f4672 100644
--- a/source3/libsmb/clientgen.c
+++ b/source3/libsmb/clientgen.c
@@ -246,7 +246,11 @@ bool cli_receive_smb(struct cli_state *cli)
/* If the server is not responding, note that now */
if (len 0) {
-DEBUG(0, (Receiving SMB: Server stopped responding\n));
+ char addr[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN];
+
+ print_sockaddr(addr, sizeof(addr), cli-dest_ss);
+DEBUG(0, (Receiving SMB: Server %s stopped responding\n,
+ addr));
close(cli-fd);
cli-fd = -1;
return false;
--
Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-6-test updated
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated via 8e60fa5 docs-xml/vfs_gpfs: document 'gpfs:refuse_dacl_protected' via af01597 docs-xml/vfs_gpfs: document 'gpfs:merge_writeappend' via 6318e44 docs-xml/vfs_gpfs: document 'gpfs:winattr' via a359814 docs-xml/vfs_gpfs: document 'gpfs:getrealfilename' via 398e182 docs-xml/vfs_gpfs: document 'gpfs:leases' via af4fd6d docs-xml/vfs_gpfs: document 'gpfs:sharemodes' via 34d3d21 librpc/ndr: correctly implement ndr_charset_length() via f87296d pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client: support argument based stubs for [in,out,string] via 81759e7 pidl:NDR: [in,out,string] doesn't need to pointers via 4ecfee7 pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client: correctly copy [out,charset()] buffers via bf451c7 pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client: fix skip reason for unsized arrays via 9e91798 selftest/Subunit.pm: fix perl warnings via d8ed2f9 subunit: Make sure ] in failure reason ends up on its own line, so the next subunit parser in the line parses it correctly. (cherry picked from commit 3c7a7bbb9a6258744523f41935f3967e48056787) via d0e42d6 lib/util: remove implicit discard_const_p() from SAFE_FREE() via 0a084ea pidl:Samba3/ClientNDR: remove unused ParseOutputArgument function via 17df5f2 s3:librpc: make dcerpc_read_ncacn_packet_send/recv() available via 822b7b3 librpc/rpc: move dcerpc_read_ncacn_packet_send/recv() to dcerpc_util.c via 8528509 librpc/rpc: call do_ndr_print hook in dcerpc_binding_handle_call*() via a8267b4 s3:winbindd: remove rpc_pipe_client references from winbind_dual_ndr code via 72ab6d2 s3:winbindd: use dcerpc_wbint_* functions instead of rpccli_wbint_* via ba97d56 s3:winbindd: add binding_handle to struct winbindd_child via 2ee2f05 s3:include: remove unused dispatch* fn pointers from rpc_pipe_client via 328bf4c s3:winbindd: remove unused wb_ndr_dispatch* functions via 2d77e5b s3:rpc_server: remove unused rpc_pipe_internal_dispatch() via 049dee1 s3:rpc_client: remove unused cli_do_rpc_ndr* functions via bf7f01f s3:rpc_client: remove unused rpc_pipe_open_local() via db69fe9 pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client.pm: correctly copy fixed size out arrays via 14d052a pidl:Samba3/ClientNDR: implement rpccli_ stubs on top of dcerpc_ stubs via 1f5cd0d s3:Makefile: link in dcerpc client stubs via 46e6919 s3:winbindd: add wbint dcerpc_binding_handle backend via 48754ee s3:rpc_server: add rpc_pipe_open_internal dcerpc_binding_handle backend via e603042 s3:rpc_client: add dcerpc_binding_handle backend via 091d129 s4:librpc/rpc: make struct dcerpc_binding_handle private via 059c063 pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client: add sync dcerpc_pipe based stubs as compat for OpenChange via 81c07cb pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client: add non struct base dcerpc_binding_handle client stubs via be77caa pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client: convert code to $self-pidl() via 9f87c1c pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client: s/interface/if/ via 279a56b pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client: make use of the new dcerpc_binding_handle_call() infrastructure via cd19ff5 pidl:Samba4/NDR/Client: remove old dcerpc_pipe based sync stubs via c1aa7ae s4:librpc/rpc: add dcerpc_binding_handle dcerpc_pipe backend via cc85d8b librpc/rpc: add dcerpc_binding_handle abstration via 33edddf s4:librpc/rpc: fix dcerpc_log_packet() prototype via 0b61752 s4:librpc/rpc: autodetect the need of async call logic via 9d63234 s4:RPC-SPOOLSS-NOTIFY: skip test_RFFPCNEx() for now, as the test is broken via 6495cf0 s4:librpc/rpc: avoid using DCERPC_NDR_REF_ALLOC for epm_Map() via 823989f s4:torture/libnet: avoid dereferencing dcerpc_binding_handle internals via a0369fe s4:blackbox/newuser: use test specific user names via 81bbacb s4:selftest: skip samba4.blackbox.ktpass for now as it's not portable via de18d37 s4:blackblock/ktpass: use test specific user name via cac7f19 s4:librpc/rpc: use the correct ndr flags in dcerpc_ndr_validate_in() from b374345 s3: Print the IP of the server that stopped responding http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test - Log - commit 8e60fa5fe848b1a8a44cf88e2866134e1f503108 Author: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Date: Mon Aug 30 10:45:52 2010 +0200 docs-xml/vfs_gpfs: document 'gpfs:refuse_dacl_protected' metze (cherry picked from commit fc79f358eb6a1dd7ed2e5f5b1e31fb664a182595) commit af015976e4d56419cb1d01c89ce6985e3a539ba2 Author: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Date: Mon Aug 30 10:31:38 2010 +0200 docs-xml/vfs_gpfs: document 'gpfs:merge_writeappend' metze (cherry picked from commit 4d76c18f78742ba92b4772037ac306b567351ca1) commit 6318e44349a8895ddf20e2e7ae372cbcca84ee7e Author:
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 97246f7 s4-test-dssync: Print the reason for skipping FetchNT4Data
test
from 5b875a8 s3: Print the IP of the server that stopped responding
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 97246f7bbd4f1df1002b606051bfb2dde4977e4a
Author: Kamen Mazdrashki kame...@samba.org
Date: Wed Sep 1 01:42:56 2010 +0300
s4-test-dssync: Print the reason for skipping FetchNT4Data test
---
Summary of changes:
source4/torture/drs/rpc/dssync.c |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source4/torture/drs/rpc/dssync.c b/source4/torture/drs/rpc/dssync.c
index 2285dfc..c7b6708 100644
--- a/source4/torture/drs/rpc/dssync.c
+++ b/source4/torture/drs/rpc/dssync.c
@@ -954,17 +954,20 @@ static bool test_FetchNT4Data(struct torture_context
*tctx,
status =
dcerpc_drsuapi_DsGetNT4ChangeLog_r(ctx-new_dc.drsuapi.drs_handle, ctx, r);
if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED)) {
- torture_skip(tctx, DsGetNT4ChangeLog not supported by
target server);
+ torture_skip(tctx,
+DsGetNT4ChangeLog not supported:
NT_STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED);
} else if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
const char *errstr = nt_errstr(status);
if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status,
NT_STATUS_RPC_PROCNUM_OUT_OF_RANGE)) {
- torture_skip(tctx, DsGetNT4ChangeLog not
supported by target server);
+ torture_skip(tctx,
+DsGetNT4ChangeLog not supported:
NT_STATUS_RPC_PROCNUM_OUT_OF_RANGE);
}
torture_fail(tctx,
talloc_asprintf(tctx,
dcerpc_drsuapi_DsGetNT4ChangeLog failed - %s\n,
errstr));
} else if (W_ERROR_EQUAL(r.out.result,
WERR_INVALID_DOMAIN_ROLE)) {
- torture_skip(tctx, DsGetNT4ChangeLog not supported by
target server);
+ torture_skip(tctx,
+DsGetNT4ChangeLog not supported:
WERR_INVALID_DOMAIN_ROLE);
} else if (!W_ERROR_IS_OK(r.out.result)) {
torture_fail(tctx,
talloc_asprintf(tctx, DsGetNT4ChangeLog
failed - %s\n,
--
Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 768475d s4:dsdb Fix attribute being searched for in dereference
against Fedora DS
via 68c61df s4:dsdb Make the dereference control critical if input is
critical
via 379d073 s4:dsdb Don't reload the schema against OpenLDAP backend
via 896553a s4:provision Allow OpenLDAP backend to provision again
via 9aae504 s4:provision Improved error handling in provisionbackend
from 97246f7 s4-test-dssync: Print the reason for skipping FetchNT4Data
test
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 768475d5716faaf3e730404d44d68f7a3250d861
Author: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org
Date: Sun Jul 11 23:11:09 2010 +1000
s4:dsdb Fix attribute being searched for in dereference against Fedora DS
The problem here is that these attributes are not mapped in the
simple_ldap_map, and they were changed a while back.
Andrew Bartlett
commit 68c61dfa3fa925c63247bef83f10dfa2efa458e6
Author: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org
Date: Sun Jul 11 23:08:46 2010 +1000
s4:dsdb Make the dereference control critical if input is critical
This helps us ensure that the backend knows about and respects the
dereference control if our caller has asked that the extended DN control
be considered critical.
Andrew Bartlett
commit 379d073444f7acafb6e5761dd667073ad7371771
Author: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org
Date: Sun Jul 11 23:07:06 2010 +1000
s4:dsdb Don't reload the schema against OpenLDAP backend
The schema should be considered read-only when we are using the OL
backend, as we can't update the backend schema in real time anyway.
Andrew Bartlett
commit 896553a1a85f541f72ab6b45e71d89d00e727791
Author: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org
Date: Thu Jul 8 11:44:13 2010 +1000
s4:provision Allow OpenLDAP backend to provision again
OpenLDAP does not have any post-setup requirements at the moment.
Andrew Bartlett
commit 9aae50443df5471b91e4d829c0ca0285adeb71bb
Author: Zahari Zahariev zahari.zahar...@postpath.com
Date: Sat Jul 3 21:43:42 2010 +0300
s4:provision Improved error handling in provisionbackend
When using OpenLDAP as a backend with Samba4 we get failure during
provision and this patch will help better determining the real error.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org
---
Summary of changes:
source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_out.c |6 --
source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba_dsdb.c|4
source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/schema_load.c | 12 +---
source4/scripting/python/samba/provisionbackend.py |7 +--
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_out.c
b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_out.c
index ba4054a..07c0bff 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_out.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_out.c
@@ -549,6 +549,7 @@ static int extended_dn_out_search(struct ldb_module
*module, struct ldb_request
const char * const *const_attrs;
struct ldb_context *ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(module);
int ret;
+ bool critical;
struct extended_dn_out_private *p =
talloc_get_type(ldb_module_get_private(module), struct extended_dn_out_private);
@@ -646,6 +647,7 @@ static int extended_dn_out_search(struct ldb_module
*module, struct ldb_request
/* mark extended DN and storage format controls as done */
if (control) {
+ critical = control-critical;
control-critical = 0;
}
@@ -659,7 +661,7 @@ static int extended_dn_out_search(struct ldb_module
*module, struct ldb_request
if (control p p-dereference p-dereference_control) {
ret = ldb_request_add_control(down_req,
DSDB_OPENLDAP_DEREFERENCE_CONTROL,
- false, p-dereference_control);
+ critical, p-dereference_control);
if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
return ret;
}
@@ -824,7 +826,7 @@ static int extended_dn_out_fds_init(struct ldb_module
*module)
{
static const char *attrs[] = {
nsUniqueId,
- objectSID,
+ sambaSID,
NULL
};
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba_dsdb.c
b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba_dsdb.c
index 82f5ec3..cdfc8d7 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba_dsdb.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba_dsdb.c
@@ -260,6 +260,10 @@ static int samba_dsdb_init(struct ldb_module *module)
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated via 4ca9683 s3-param: added lp_set_cmdline() and --option= parameter via f6a631b s4-resolve: added resolve_name_ex_send() via cecc58e s4-auth: make the disabled acct messages a bit less verbose via b7060c7 s4-selftest: try DNS before bcast in selftest via efbc702 s4-resolve: add a default domain for unqualified names in file backend via 39599e9 s4-pidl: added a test for all generated rpc interfaces via 71f2ebc pidl: cope with dom_sid28 in python generator via eccb22c doc: patched bind9 is no longer needed via e2fdcf1 pynet: fixed ref count error on Py_None via 58d92ce pidl-python: cope with NULL pointers in more places via e7e3958 pytalloc: treat a NULL ptr as Py_None via 9f5dcb2 s4-net: use CommandError() in net rodc from 768475d s4:dsdb Fix attribute being searched for in dereference against Fedora DS http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit 4ca96834f3b77757d1e03fbc5290677b6724b785 Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Wed Aug 11 13:35:14 2010 +1000 s3-param: added lp_set_cmdline() and --option= parameter Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org commit f6a631bdec3ec2aba8a923136b66edf36273d9f2 Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Tue Aug 31 14:00:37 2010 +1000 s4-resolve: added resolve_name_ex_send() this allows access to the flags that control name resolution Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org commit cecc58e0582a8574f239a26e354c00a6d570c3d5 Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Tue Aug 31 12:28:55 2010 +1000 s4-auth: make the disabled acct messages a bit less verbose raise the debug level Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org commit b7060c7c5c78d7a7416707c6217fe163c1183e2d Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Tue Aug 31 12:07:40 2010 +1000 s4-selftest: try DNS before bcast in selftest this better reflects real usage commit efbc702b1eac7c35b0d64d45a8043db3642361a0 Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Tue Aug 31 12:07:07 2010 +1000 s4-resolve: add a default domain for unqualified names in file backend this better emulates what happens with real DNS commit 39599e949b9231fa5d88b1a6830b442c1faba1d9 Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Mon Aug 30 15:41:22 2010 +1000 s4-pidl: added a test for all generated rpc interfaces this tries to instantiate all types in all generated python RPC interfaces, then checks that all attributes can be read, written and compared. commit 71f2ebcae09a3581cb27966b44387a10ea89236d Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Mon Aug 30 15:37:11 2010 +1000 pidl: cope with dom_sid28 in python generator treated the same as dom_sid2 commit eccb22c9fb21f6b439dd6ced03e946f84dccd455 Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Mon Aug 30 15:29:26 2010 +1000 doc: patched bind9 is no longer needed bind9.7.2rc1 contains all the patches needed to work with Samba4 krb5 DNS updates with w2k8r2. commit e2fdcf1a7a977d6984abae71d24b9dbdac19bbce Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Sat Aug 28 22:18:00 2010 +1000 pynet: fixed ref count error on Py_None ensure we don't run out of None ... Pair-Programmed-With: Jelmer Vernooij jel...@samba.org commit 58d92cefe266e423f05dec3a2fef91ebc870c350 Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Sat Aug 28 22:00:21 2010 +1000 pidl-python: cope with NULL pointers in more places NULL is converted to Py_None commit e7e39584a9dcfd7d98dc10b88baa53019a77e652 Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Sat Aug 28 21:53:27 2010 +1000 pytalloc: treat a NULL ptr as Py_None commit 9f5dcb2235b42177bc325a48930917b5d68308e4 Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Fri Aug 27 12:08:49 2010 +1000 s4-net: use CommandError() in net rodc this integrates better with the net command Pair-Programmed-With: Jelmer Vernooij jel...@samba.org --- Summary of changes: examples/bind9-patches/README |6 + lib/talloc/pytalloc.c | 28 - lib/talloc/pytalloc.h |4 + pidl/lib/Parse/Pidl/Samba4/Python.pm | 16 +- selftest/target/Samba4.pm |2 +- source3/include/proto.h|2 + source3/include/smb.h |1 + source3/lib/popt_common.c | 10 ++ source3/param/loadparm.c | 156 +++- source4/auth/sam.c | 12 +-
