[Samba] oplocks issue when trying to copy file

[Philip Ong]

I'm not sure if this a Kernel/samba or NFS issue. We run this on Centos 5.6 
using a kernel.org kernel.

Please find below the problem description

When trying to copy a file to a samba share which has NFS backend on 2.6.36.3 
or newer Linux kernel following message is displayed on windows client 

"An unexpected error is keeping you from copying the file. If you continue to 
receive this error, you can use the error code to search for help with this 
problem.
Error 0x80070021: The process cannot access the file because another process 
has locked a portion of the file"

I am able to delete a file within the same directory structure. I am also able 
to create a file or folder by right-clicking within Windows Explorer on XP. 
Below are the logs generated by samba in debug mode. The main line of interest 
was:

  linux_set_kernel_oplock: Refused oplock on file home/foo/open/test.cfg, fd = 
33, file_id = 17:aa41ab:0. (Invalid argument)


Please note "test.cfg" was the file which we were trying to copy from windows

  check_reduced_name [home/foo/open/test.cfg] [/]
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128330, 10] smbd/vfs.c:968(check_reduced_name)
  check_reduced_name realpath [home/foo/open/test.cfg] -> 
[/home/foo/open/test.cfg]
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128339,  3] smbd/vfs.c:1038(check_reduced_name)
  check_reduced_name: home/foo/open/test.cfg reduced to /home/foo/open/test.cfg
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128348, 10] smbd/open.c:3414(create_file_default)
  create_file: access_mask = 0x6019f file_attributes = 0x20, share_access = 
0x0, create_disposition = 0x2 create_options = 0x44 oplock_request
= 0x3 root_dir_fid = 0x0, ea_list = 0x(nil), sd = 0x(nil), fname = 
home/foo/open/test.cfg
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128359,  3] smbd/vfs.c:881(check_reduced_name)
  check_reduced_name [home/foo/open/test.cfg] [/]
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128377, 10] smbd/vfs.c:968(check_reduced_name)
  check_reduced_name realpath [home/foo/open/test.cfg] -> 
[/home/foo/open/test.cfg]
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128386,  3] smbd/vfs.c:1038(check_reduced_name)
  check_reduced_name: home/foo/open/test.cfg reduced to /home/foo/open/test.cfg
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128394, 10] smbd/open.c:2941(create_file_unixpath)
  create_file_unixpath: access_mask = 0x6019f file_attributes = 0x20, 
share_access = 0x0, create_disposition = 0x2 create_options = 0x44 oplock
_request = 0x3 ea_list = 0x(nil), sd = 0x(nil), fname = home/foo/open/test.cfg
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128406,  5] smbd/files.c:119(file_new)
  allocated file structure 14342, fnum = 18438 (4 used)
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128416,  3] smbd/dosmode.c:166(unix_mode)
  unix_mode(home/foo/open/test.cfg) returning 0744
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128424, 10] smbd/open.c:1556(open_file_ntcreate)
  open_file_ntcreate: fname=home/foo/open/test.cfg, dos_attrs=0x20 
access_mask=0x6019f share_access=0x0 create_disposition = 0x2 create_options
=0x44 unix mode=0744 oplock_request=3
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128434,  3] smbd/vfs.c:881(check_reduced_name)
  check_reduced_name [home/foo/open/test.cfg] [/]
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128462, 10] smbd/vfs.c:968(check_reduced_name)
  check_reduced_name realpath [home/foo/open/test.cfg] -> 
[/home/foo/open/test.cfg]
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128471,  3] smbd/vfs.c:1038(check_reduced_name)
  check_reduced_name: home/foo/open/test.cfg reduced to /home/foo/open/test.cfg
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128480, 10] smbd/open.c:1738(open_file_ntcreate)
  open_file_ntcreate: fname=home/foo/open/test.cfg, after mapping 
access_mask=0x6019f
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.128489,  4] smbd/open.c:2000(open_file_ntcreate)
  calling open_file with flags=0x2 flags2=0xC0 mode=0744, access_mask = 
0x6019f, open_access_mask = 0x6019f
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.132844, 10] smbd/open.c:180(fd_open)
  fd_open: name home/foo/open/test.cfg, flags = 0302 mode = 0744, fd = 33.
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.132887, 10] smbd/notify_internal.c:890(notify_trigger)
  notify_trigger called action=0x1, filter=0x1, path=//home/foo/open/test.cfg
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.132897,  2] smbd/open.c:657(open_file)
  jneil opened file home/foo/open/test.cfg read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=4)
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.132909, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:100(db_tdb_fetch_locked)
  Locking key 1700AB41
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.132919, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:129(db_tdb_fetch_locked)
  Allocated locked data 0x0x782393a0
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.132938, 10] smbd/open.c:1057(delay_for_oplocks)
  delay_for_oplocks: oplock type 0x3 on file home/foo/open/test.cfg
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.132947, 10] smbd/open.c:1057(delay_for_oplocks)
  delay_for_oplocks: oplock type 0x3 on file home/foo/open/test.cfg
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.267573,  3] 
smbd/oplock_linux.c:120(linux_set_kernel_oplock)
  linux_set_kernel_oplock: Refused oplock on file home/foo/open/test.cfg, fd = 
33, file_id = 17:aa41ab:0. (Invalid argument)
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.267612, 10] smbd/dosmode.c:701(file_set_dosmode)
  file_set_dosmode: setting dos mode 0x20 on file home/foo/open/test.cfg
[2011/09/27 17:41:41.267631,  8] smbd/dosmode.c:613(dos_mode)
  dos_mode: home/foo/op

Re: [Samba] Can't remember name of command to temporarily disable a share

[Christ Schlacta]

On 9/27/2011 21:11, John H Terpstra wrote:

On 09/27/2011 10:13 PM, Christ Schlacta wrote:

I need to temporarily disable a share for a few days, I remember there
was an entry I could add to the share definition to temporarily disable
the share (I think it was disabled=true or enabled=false) but I can't
remember what it was for sure, nor can I find it in the manual. what is
it ?


That parameter would be:

"available = no"
"browseable = no"

- John T.

Thank you very much!  ^,.,^
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Can't remember name of command to temporarily disable a share

[John H Terpstra]

On 09/27/2011 10:13 PM, Christ Schlacta wrote:

I need to temporarily disable a share for a few days, I remember there
was an entry I could add to the share definition to temporarily disable
the share (I think it was disabled=true or enabled=false) but I can't
remember what it was for sure, nor can I find it in the manual. what is
it ?


That parameter would be:

"available = no"
"browseable = no"

- John T.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Can't remember name of command to temporarily disable a share

[Christ Schlacta]

I need to temporarily disable a share for a few days, I remember there 
was an entry I could add to the share definition to temporarily disable 
the share (I think it was disabled=true or enabled=false) but I can't 
remember what it was for sure, nor can I find it in the manual.  what is 
it ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba4 and sysvol share

[felix]

> On 27/09/2011 13:07, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu wrote:
>> Hello.
>> I noticed that any domain user can delete the content of the shared
>> folder
>> sysvol in the domain controller from a windows client.
>>
>> How can I avoid that?
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Felix
>>
> What's the default windows behavior with this ?
>
> Matthieu.
>
Windows users  Windows permissions
-
Domain Admins---> Full Access
Authenticated User--> Read & Execute, List folder contents, Read
CREATOR OWNER---> Special permissions (Maybe we don't need this)
Server Operators> Read & Execute, List folder contents, Read
SYSTEM--> Full Access

Thanks for your attention.
Felix.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba4 and sysvol share

[Matthieu Patou]

On 27/09/2011 13:07, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu wrote:

Hello.
I noticed that any domain user can delete the content of the shared folder
sysvol in the domain controller from a windows client.

How can I avoid that?

Greetings,
Felix


What's the default windows behavior with this ?

Matthieu.

--
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team
http://samba.org

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Samba4 and sysvol share

[felix]

Hello.
I noticed that any domain user can delete the content of the shared folder
sysvol in the domain controller from a windows client.

How can I avoid that?

Greetings,
Felix

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Samba access control issue

[Matthew Hacker]

FYI for others who might have this trouble.

I recently had an issue with windows clients not finding a driver for a printer
on my cups/samba print server.  During debugging I eventually tried to use
cupsaddsmb to rebuild the printer driver share files.  This resulted is various
errors like

protocol negotiation failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_NETWORK_RESPONSE and
result was WERR_ACCESS_DENIED

further investigation led me to realize that "smbclient -L locahost" also failed
with access denied errors.  A couple of helpful posts on the internet suggested
ipv6 might be part of the issue and I eventually realized that

smbclient -L localhost  fails
smbclient -L 127.0.0.1  works
smbclient -L ::1fails

After much more head scratching I realized at some point I had restricted my
hosts access like so:

hosts allow = k.k.k.k/xx, 127.0.0.0

and since my linux system (debian) like others routes both "localhost" and "::1"
to the loopback over the ipv6 interface the access control was denying access.

I changed it to:

hosts allow = k.k.k.k/xx, 127.0.0.0/8, ::1

which fixed the problem.  The "::1" addition is what fixed my particular
problem, I changed the 127.x to the subnet /8 since I believe that's technically
correct.  Theoretically all of the 127.x.x.x number could be used although in
practice I haven't seen that.

FYI in case anyone else sees the same error messages.

-Matthew


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Log: param/loadparm.c:widelinks_warning(4722)

[Jeremy Allison]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 02:51:52PM -0300, Walmiro Muzzi wrote:
> Good afternoon.
> 
> Today, after a printer is, all machines on the network accused "spooler is
> not running."
> 
> With the printer removed, all other work once again.
> 
> Now, some users are complaining that some files are not opening.
> 
> I have checked the log of samba, and is continuing with this message:
> 
> "9/27/2011 14:43:12, 0] param / loadparm.c: widelinks_warning (4722)
>Share 'IPC $' has wide links and unix extensions enabled. These
> parameters are incompatible. Wide links will be disabled for this share. "
> 
> What do I do to solve this problem?
> 
> Nothing has changed on the server since 2007.

This was a security change to prevent users from
following symlinks outside the share area. Add
"wide links = no" to the [global] section of
your smb.conf file.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Log: param/loadparm.c:widelinks_warning(4722)

[Walmiro Muzzi]

Good afternoon.

Today, after a printer is, all machines on the network accused "spooler is
not running."

With the printer removed, all other work once again.

Now, some users are complaining that some files are not opening.

I have checked the log of samba, and is continuing with this message:

"9/27/2011 14:43:12, 0] param / loadparm.c: widelinks_warning (4722)
   Share 'IPC $' has wide links and unix extensions enabled. These
parameters are incompatible. Wide links will be disabled for this share. "

What do I do to solve this problem?

Nothing has changed on the server since 2007.

Thanks.

WMuzzi
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Is NFSv4 dead ? Samba report from the SNIA SDC conference.

[Jeremy Allison]

Chris Hertel just wrote up a new Samba Team blog
entry about the SNIA SDC conference here:

http://samba.org/samba/news/developers/2011-snia-sdc-report.html

It's a great read for people who weren't able to
make it !

Ping him at c...@samba.org if you have any questions
about it.

Cheers,

Jeremy.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] WINS Server TIme out registering IP

[steffo76]

Has anyone ever figured this out ? I have the same problem- as soon as I put 
the log level to 2 or higher, I get the following:

wins_registration_timeout: WINS server 127.0.0.1 timed out registering IP 
192.168.0.12

I looked into it and see packets being sent from 192.168.0.12 to 127.0.0.1:137 
but I dont't see a reply which is probably why the log message appears (in  
nmbd_nameregister.c it says:
* If we are registering unicast, then NOT getting a response is an
 * error - we do not have the name. If we are registering broadcast,
 * then we don't expect to get a response.)

I checked reachability of ports 137 and 138 udp using nc and they are both 
reachable.

In my smb.conf I have 
wins support = yes 

and _no_ wins server = line.

No firewall, no selinux. 

Samba version is 3.5.9

Regards
Stephan
-- 
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Slow Directory Access after upgrade to 3.5.6

[Mike]

I tried the settings but still no luck with
"find_domain_master_name_query_fail" message.

~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
#=== Global Settings
=
[global]

   netbios name = a1
   workgroup = mw
   server string = A1 Server
   security = user
   hosts allow = 192.168.1. 127.
   hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0
   log file = /var/log/samba.%m
   max log size = 500
   passdb backend = tdbsam
   encrypt passwords = Yes
   domain master = no
   local master = yes
   os level = 15
##   time server = yes
##   preferred master = yes
   wins support = yes
   name resolve order = wins host bcast lmhosts
   wide links = no
   log level = 3
=

~#cat /var/log/samba.nmbd:
[2011/09/27 07:06:13.170424,  0]
nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:350(find_domain_master_name_query_fail)
  find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
  Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name MW<1b> for the workgroup MW.
  Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
[2011/09/27 07:21:18.364603,  0]
nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:350(find_domain_master_name_query_fail)
  find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
  Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name MW<1b> for the workgroup MW.
  Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
[2011/09/27 07:36:25.026395,  0]
nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:350(find_domain_master_name_query_fail)
  find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
  Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name MW<1b> for the workgroup MW.
  Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
[2011/09/27 07:51:32.479213,  0]
nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:350(find_domain_master_name_query_fail)
  find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
  Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name MW<1b> for the workgroup MW.
  Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Slow Directory Access after upgrade to 3.5.6

[Mike]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:30 AM, saddam abu ghaida <
saddam.abugha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> set local master to yes and domain master to no
>
>
Excellent, will give it a try.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] nss_winbind problem

[Sandu Mihai]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Erm,

Voodo stuff. getent passwd does not work. BUT, id 'user' works. Same for
group.

id X\\gicu.scularie -- works wonders

getent passwd nope :)

I do have wins enum users and wins enum groups set to yes, so getent
should work.

Well then, crisis is somehow over, since I only need nss_winbind to work
for some local rights on files.

Best regards,

Sandu Mihai


On 09/27/2011 12:25 PM, Sandu Mihai wrote:
> Can anyone that delt with this kind of problems shed some light on steps
> to do to debug?
> 
> wbinfo -u - got list of users
> wbinfo -g - got list of groups
> 
> getent passwd - only local users + local domain users, no user list from
> trusted domain
> getent group - same
> 
> strace shows that  I am connecting to the winbindd named pipe when going
> 'getent ...' so, the nss_winbind module works (or so).
> 
> One one machine (PDC) I have 3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2, on BDC (I am using it
> for backup of data from PDC, and upgrade experiments) 3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.
> 
> 3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 works wonders (wbinfo -u, -g, getent, etc)
> 3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2 does not work
> 
> I am using the same config on both machines, the only diffrence is in
> PDC/BDC config options.
> 
> ldconfig issued after upgrade on BDC, so I don't suspect any lib
> problems for nss_winbind.
> 
> Distro is CentOS 5
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Sandu Mihai
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOgZitAAoJELXw04oLkAtVKj4H/jvZzSOGl24QVIoCLSYHI7U9
wicILrE+ETyTGTwfeBkG2iYR/+1v0ZSkj3QjR24XUT2fkjQ6Q+oKWbYvL0/hz9QQ
d2N/hvIxXMqOgowYthwmaeD5p3EhfPcaBiDNuEgGuynw3e9DuINouEmG2o4aSrM5
hYH+JHNnWclgoax0BArkP2LnsaBcstdjcrOMyRnpEuwqLqP0byGjrnCsr/cujTj5
Vrbx1NfagddQpB9dnyBKm60lF0Fx6Sl3Ym17xmk+BOEFkQHkQvVVl7N6S6cIi2GF
apWapy0mmnZoq3txjJxo3mrcgKAnuyZj/sFN7L57sweXYxjqV1txH5q58hC8DP0=
=Jqqv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Slow Directory Access after upgrade to 3.5.6

[saddam abu ghaida]

set local master to yes and domain master to no


On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Mike <1100...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:35 AM, sghaida wrote:
>
>> hello again,
>>
>> can you make the os level 15 or 20 in order to force SAMBA not to become
>> preferred master by election. and check if you will still have the same
>> issue
>>
>>
> Would the following configuration be acceptable to test your suggestion:
>
>
> domain master = yes
> local master = yes
> os level = 15
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] nss_winbind problem

[Sandu Mihai]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Can anyone that delt with this kind of problems shed some light on steps
to do to debug?

wbinfo -u - got list of users
wbinfo -g - got list of groups

getent passwd - only local users + local domain users, no user list from
trusted domain
getent group - same

strace shows that  I am connecting to the winbindd named pipe when going
'getent ...' so, the nss_winbind module works (or so).

One one machine (PDC) I have 3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2, on BDC (I am using it
for backup of data from PDC, and upgrade experiments) 3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.

3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 works wonders (wbinfo -u, -g, getent, etc)
3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2 does not work

I am using the same config on both machines, the only diffrence is in
PDC/BDC config options.

ldconfig issued after upgrade on BDC, so I don't suspect any lib
problems for nss_winbind.

Distro is CentOS 5

Best regards,

Sandu Mihai

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOgZZvAAoJELXw04oLkAtV6ssH+wWqbYx0/epmidPrJxFtyBN3
o9UXyzldwfcjOIaVjd/R0gNUsW5quMlP41+ECF4UX4VD6+IpYIMf1PqUuip4s4gO
T9bxRNnT00Mo36UFycC9LT0CzYVwF1E4M9bwPfeXNt0TqymvjeAeAmhxPQ+NA4bM
XQkmOriZQ69zocaRjOlvHtHlg2xZXNcYh7Gx+ZoRofNsQ3/vfxDxf61Aw3x73Mdd
06eBEJeaEnjkfzo93P00ucoZlJ9LHqgSDWluwhizvXhALeKHUJQfI5236dgdiS/r
IH/dZyWWZ0Dk8YHVjBtKk5c3VosGPsMgWiHfJTuaVFzySHA6AJjBETzCL92ZaPM=
=piCQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Slow Directory Access after upgrade to 3.5.6

[Mike]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:35 AM, sghaida  wrote:

> hello again,
>
> can you make the os level 15 or 20 in order to force SAMBA not to become
> preferred master by election. and check if you will still have the same
> issue
>
>
Would the following configuration be acceptable to test your suggestion:

domain master = yes
local master = yes
os level = 15

Thanks for your help.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Slow Directory Access after upgrade to 3.5.6

[sghaida]

hello again,

can you make the os level 15 or 20 in order to force SAMBA not to become
preferred master by election. and check if you will still have the same
issue

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Mike-14 [via Samba] <
ml-node+s2283325n3845173...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Dale Schroeder <
> [hidden email] >
> wrote:
>
> > If you wish for your Samba system to be the domain master browser, then
> use
> >
> >domain master = Yes
> >
> >preferred master = Yes
> >local master = Yes
> >os level = 99# (65 or higher)
> >
> > That might solve your master browser error messages.  See
> > http://lists.samba.org/**archive/samba-technical/2000-**June/008259.html
> 
> >
> > Another suggestion here:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/**samba@.../**msg61180.html
> >
>
> >
> >
> Dale,
> Thank you to you too for the thoughtful response.
> I've incorporated both your suggestions for now and want to see if the
> users
> report any difference.
>
> domain master = yes
> local master = yes
> ## preferred master = yes
> ## os level = 99
>
> I've restarted both the nmbd and smbd daemons but the /var/log/samba.nmbd
> log continues to report:
>
> [2011/09/26 15:31:19.673919,  0]
> nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:350(find_domain_master_name_query_fail)
>   find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
>   Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name MW<1b> for the workgroup
> MW.
>   Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
> [2011/09/26 15:46:20.163072,  0]
> nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:350(find_domain_master_name_query_fail)
>   find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
>   Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name MW<1b> for the workgroup
> MW.
>   Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
> [2011/09/26 16:01:22.148946,  0]
> nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:350(find_domain_master_name_query_fail)
>   find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
>   Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name MW<1b> for the workgroup
> MW.
>   Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
>
> However, it may be that I need to do a killall to remove stray .pid's
> I didn't want to do so while all the users were still logged in and
> working.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>
> --
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/Slow-Directory-Access-after-upgrade-to-3-5-6-tp3830496p3845173.html
>  To unsubscribe from Slow Directory Access after upgrade to 3.5.6, click
> here.
>
>


--
View this message in context: 
http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/Slow-Directory-Access-after-upgrade-to-3-5-6-tp3830496p3846498.html
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba